80 FR 43979 - Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 142 (July 24, 2015)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 142 (July 24, 2015)
| Page Range | 43979-43987 | |
| FR Document | 2015-17921 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 43979-43987] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-17921] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 18 CFR Parts 157, 260, and 284 [Docket No. RM96-1-038] Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is proposing to amend its regulations to incorporate by reference, with certain enumerated exceptions, the latest version (Version 3.0) of business practice standards adopted by the Wholesale Gas Quadrant of the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) applicable to natural gas pipelines. These revisions, in part, revise the codes used to identify receipt and delivery locations in the Index of Customers. In addition, for consistency with the revisions to the Index of Customers, the Commission is proposing certain conforming changes to the Commission's regulations on exhibits and on system flow diagrams. DATES: Comments are due August 24, 2015. ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by docket number, may be filed in the following ways:Electronic Filing through http://www.ferc.gov. Documents created electronically using word processing software should be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format and not in a scanned format. Mail/Hand Delivery: Those unable to file electronically may mail or hand-deliver comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Comment Procedures section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Wolf (technical issues), Office of Energy Policy and Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-6841, Email: [email protected]. Oscar F. Santillana (technical issues), Office of Energy Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-6392, Email: [email protected]. Gary D. Cohen (legal issues), Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-8321, Email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents Paragraph Nos. I. Background........................................ 2 II. Discussion....................................... 8 A. Modifications to Standards to Support the 12 Commission's Show Cause Order in Docket No. RP14- 442-000......................................... B. Location Codes................................ 15 C. Request in Order No. 587-V for NAESB to 18 Evaluate the Use of the Terms ``Operating Capacity'' and ``Design Capacity''.............. D. Standards Previously Not Incorporated by 20 Reference....................................... 1. Contracts Standards and eTariff Related 20 Standards................................... 2. Record Retention Standards................ 21 3. WGQ Interpretations....................... 22 E. Proposed Implementation Procedures............ 23 III. Notice of Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards.. 28 [[Page 43980]] IV. Incorporation By Reference....................... 29 V. Information Collection Statement.................. 32 VI. Environmental Analysis........................... 36 VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis and 37 Certification....................................... VIII. Comment Procedures............................. 40 IX. Document Availability............................ 44 Appendix............................................. a 1. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) proposes to amend its regulations at 18 CFR 284.12 to incorporate by reference, with certain enumerated exceptions, the latest version (Version 3.0) of business practice standards adopted by the Wholesale Gas Quadrant (WGQ) of the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) applicable to natural gas pipelines that NAESB reported to the Commission on November 14, 2014. The Version 3.0 package of standards includes standards governing coordination of the scheduling processes of interstate natural gas pipelines and public utilities that the Commission incorporated by reference in Docket No. RM14-2-000.\1\ The standards also revise the codes used to identify receipt and delivery locations in the Index of Customers. In addition, for consistency with the Index of Customers, the Commission proposes to amend its regulations at 18 CFR 157.14, 157.18, and 260.8 to have receipt and delivery point information in exhibits and system flow diagrams use the same location point names as provided for in the Version 3.0 Standards. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Coordination of the Scheduling Processes of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines and Public Utilities, Order No. 809, Final Rule, 80 FR 23197 (Apr. 24, 2015), FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,368. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Background 2. Since 1996, the Commission has adopted regulations to standardize the business practices and communication methodologies of interstate natural gas pipelines to create a more integrated and efficient pipeline grid. These regulations have been promulgated in the Order No. 587 series of orders,\2\ wherein the Commission has incorporated by reference standards for interstate natural gas pipeline business practices and electronic communications that were developed and adopted by NAESB's WGQ. Upon incorporation by reference, this version of these standards will become part of the Commission's regulations and compliance by interstate natural gas pipelines will become mandatory. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ This series of orders began with the Commission's issuance of Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, Order No. 587, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,038 (1996). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. On July 23, 2013, as corrected on July 25, 2013, NAESB filed a report informing the Commission that it had adopted and ratified Version 2.1 of its business practice standards applicable to natural gas pipelines. NAESB reports that the WGQ reviewed, at the request of the industry, the necessity of maintaining the current location common codes system to determine if the system provides a significant benefit to the industry and should be continued.\3\ NAESB (in its previous corporate incarnation as the Gas Industry Standards Board) adopted a system of registering common codes to identify interconnection points between pipelines using a single code for the shared point. The industry chose an independent third party to assign and maintain the common code database. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ NAESB Version 2.1 Report dated July 23, 2013 (NAESB Version 2.1 Report). As explained in the NAESB Version 2.1 Report, this request was received by NAESB in November 2010 and was included by the NAESB Board of Directors in the 2011 WGQ Annual Plan as part of Item No. 7 and as part of the 2012 WGQ Annual Plan Item No. 8. See NAESB Version 2.1 Report at 3. The proposed modifications made in response to this request were developed by the WGQ's Business Practices Subcommittee and jointly by the Information Requirements/ Technical Subcommittees. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. NAESB reports that, after extensive discussions, the WGQ reached the conclusion that the NAESB WGQ Standards should no longer support the location common codes system, as the NAESB membership concluded that the system provided little commercial benefit to the industry at large. Consistent with this determination, the Version 2.1 Standards added seven new standards, modified six standards, and deleted three standards to match up with a transition from common codes to proprietary codes.\4\ These will be the codes assigned by the transportation service providers for the identification of locations.\5\ The standards require pipelines to post sufficient information on their Web sites to permit shippers and the Commission to identify the interconnection points between pipelines that were previously identified through the common codes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ NAESB Version 2.1 Report at 2. \5\ Id. at 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. Additionally, as requested by the Commission in Order No. 587- V,\6\ NAESB modified the standards to include reporting requirements for ``Design Capacity'' for each location by transportation service providers.\7\ Other changes to the existing standards were made at the request of industry. These include changes to the NAESB WGQ Additional Standards, Nominations Related Standards, Flowing Gas Related Standards, Invoicing Related Standards, Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Standards, Capacity Release Related Standards, and Data Set Standards.\8\ NAESB further reports on the changes it made to the NAESB WGQ Interpretations and Contracts and Manuals that the Commission has declined to incorporate by reference in past Final Rules.\9\ NAESB also reports on all the minor corrections it has made to the standards since Version 2.0 of the Standards.\10\ Finally, NAESB reports on items that it considered changing but on which it took no action.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, Final Rule, Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 (2012) (Order No. 587-V). \7\ Id. at 2-3. \8\ Id. at 3. \9\ See, e.g., Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at n.11. \10\ NAESB Version 2.1 Report at 18. \11\ Id. at 17-18. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. On November 14, 2014, NAESB filed a report informing the Commission that it had adopted and ratified Version 3.0 of its business practice standards applicable to natural gas pipelines. NAESB reports that all of the modifications made in the Version 2.1 Standards are included in the Version 3.0 Standards and thus no action is needed on the Version 2.1 Standards.\12\ The Version 3.0 Standards added the modifications to support efforts to harmonize gas-electric scheduling coordination that NAESB had separately filed and that the Commission incorporated by reference in Order No. 809.\13\ In addition, the Version 3.0 Standards contain revisions to the [[Page 43981]] capacity release standards regarding posting requirements for offers to purchase released capacity that were the subject of the Commission's order to show cause in Docket No. RP14-442-000.\14\ Other revisions in the Version 3.0 Standards are: (1) Revisions to the standards to define ``Operating Capacity'' and ``Design Capacity'' in response to the Commission request in Order No. 587-V; \15\ (2) elimination of the WGQ Interpretations, which the Commission declined to incorporate by reference; (3) modifications to standards to reflect the interpretations; (4) modifications for maintenance purposes, which includes changes to eliminate the appearance of the electronic data interchange in the imbalance trading process; (5) modifications to reflect new data elements; and (6) edits for clarity and to increase user-friendliness. The Version 3.0 standards have also been revised to include 29 minor corrections.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ NAESB Version 3.0 Report dated Nov. 14, 2014 (NAESB Version 3.0 Report) at 2. \13\ See supra n.1. \14\ Posting of Offers to Purchase Capacity, 146 FERC ] 61,203, at P 6 (2014) (Show Cause Order); B-R Pipeline Co., 149 FERC ] 61,031 (2014) (order accepting compliance filings). \15\ Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at P 8. \16\ The NAESB Version 3.0 Report also provides information on other NAESB activities and tools unrelated to standards development. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. On July 7, 2015, NAESB filed a report informing the Commission that it has made errata corrections to the WGQ Version 3.0 Business Practice Standards.\17\ These corrections incorporate a 9:00 a.m. Central Clock Time (CCT) start to the gas operating day, consistent with the Commission's findings in Order No. 809 \18\ and also correct other minor errors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ NAESB adopted two minor corrections, MC15009 and MC15012, approved on April 30, 2015 and May 29, 2015, respectively. \18\ Order No. 809, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,368 at P 171. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Discussion 8. In this NOPR, the Commission proposes to incorporate by reference, in its regulations, Version 3.0 of the NAESB WGQ's consensus business practice standards,\19\ with certain exceptions.\20\ We propose that the implementation date for these standards coincide with the implementation of the Gas-Electric Coordination standards on April 1, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ A list of the revisions NAESB's WGQ Version 3.0 Standards made to prior standards is appended to this NOPR. \20\ In the discussion below we identify the NAESB WGQ Version 3.0 Standards that we propose not to incorporate by reference. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. Adoption of the Version 3.0 Standards will continue the process of updating and improving NAESB's business practice standards for the benefit of the entire wholesale natural gas market. 10. As the Commission found in Order No. 587, adoption of consensus standards is appropriate because the consensus process helps ensure the reasonableness of the standards by requiring that the standards draw support from a broad spectrum of industry participants representing all segments of the industry.\21\ Moreover, because the industry has to conduct business under these standards, the Commission's regulations should reflect those standards that have the widest possible support. In section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTT&AA), Congress affirmatively requires federal agencies to use technical standards developed by voluntary consensus standards organizations, like NAESB, as a means to carry out policy objectives or activities.\22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ The NAESB process first requires a super-majority vote of 17 out of 25 members of the WGQ's Executive Committee with support from at least two members from each of the five industry segments-- Distributors, End Users, Pipelines, Producers, and Services (including marketers and computer service providers). For final approval, 67 percent of the WGQ's general membership voting must ratify the standards. \22\ Pub. L. 104-113, section 12(d), 110 Stat. 775 (1996), 15 U.S.C. 272, note (1997). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. We discuss below some specific aspects of the filing. A. Modifications to Standards To Support the Commission's Show Cause Order in Docket No. RP14-442-000 12. On March 20, 2014, the Commission issued an Order to Show Cause in Docket No. RP14-442-000,\23\ which required all interstate pipelines to either revise their respective tariffs to provide for the posting of offers to purchase released capacity as required by section 284.8(d) of the Commission's regulations,\24\ or to demonstrate that their existing tariffs are in full compliance with that section. In the Show Cause Order, the Commission also requested that NAESB develop certain business practice and communications standards specifying: (1) The information required for requests to acquire capacity; (2) the methods by which such information is to be exchanged; and (3) the location of the information on a pipeline's Internet Web site.\25\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ Show Cause Order, 146 FERC ] 61,203 at P 6. \24\ 18 CFR 284.8(d). That section states that ``[t]he pipeline must provide notice of offers to release or to purchase capacity, the terms and conditions of such offers, and the name of any replacement shipper . . ., on an Internet Web site, for a reasonable period.'' \25\ Show Cause Order, 146 FERC ] 61,203 at P 6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13. In response, NAESB proposes to modify WGQ Standard 4.3.23 to add ``Request to Purchase Releasable Capacity'' as a subcategory of information contained in a transportation service provider's information postings Web site. NAESB also proposes to add new WGQ Standard 5.3.73, containing requirements regarding requests to purchase capacity that is releasable. 14. The Commission proposes to incorporate by reference revised WGQ Standard 4.3.23 and WGQ Standard 5.3.73. We note, however, that our proposal to incorporate WGQ Standard 5.3.73 by reference is not intended to eliminate any posting requirements additionally imposed by the Commission in Docket No. RP14-442-000. B. Location Codes 15. NAESB has proposed to revise its standards regarding the use of location codes. The industry has determined that having a third party maintain a common code database is not worth the expense and effort and has revised the prior standards to introduce the use of proprietary codes to identify the location of points of receipt and delivery. The revised standards include requirements for the pipelines to post on their Web sites information on each of the proprietary points that can be used to determine which points are interconnecting points between pipelines, one of the primary reasons for adoption of the common code database. These codes are also used by the Commission in its Index of Customers to identify the points on shippers' contracts and we propose to revise section 284.13(c) of the regulations to coordinate with this change. 16. We propose to incorporate by reference these revised standards, as they are based on an industry consensus, will reduce industry's costs to support the retention of common codes, and because the changes will maintain the ability of shippers and others to identify interconnection points between pipelines. Given the ability of the Commission and customers to continue to identify interconnection points referenced in the Index of Customers, the Commission finds that the revised code standards appear to satisfy the requirements for the Index of Customers and we will modify the regulations to permit the use of the proprietary codes. In addition, to avoid any confusion from the use of inconsistent location codes, we propose to accompany our incorporation by reference of these revised standards with a proposal to revise our regulations [[Page 43982]] at 18 CFR 157.14, 157.18, and 260.8 that require the use of location code information in certain filings and flow diagrams. 17. Pipelines will be required to continue to file the Index of Customers using the current tab-delimited file format according to the Form No. 549B--Index of Customers Instruction Manual. The major changes to the instructions are the change from the use of common codes to proprietary codes and the use of the pipelines' company registration number in place of three digit pipeline code. A revised instruction manual (with revisions marked) will be posted in this docket on eLibrary and will be available on the Commission's Web site.\26\ Because tab-delimited file formats can be difficult and can result in errors that impose burdens both on Commission and pipeline staff to correct, we also are adding the Index of Customers form to the list of forms that are being updated as part of the Commission's forms refresh project in Docket No. AD15-11-000 (Forms Project).\27\ Adding the Index of Customers to the Forms Project will move the Commission towards the use of a standard approach for all Commission forms that will result in more efficient filing and processing of forms. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ http://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/indus-act/pipelines/standards.asp. \27\ Electronic Filing Protocols for Commission Forms, 151 FERC ] 61,025 (2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Request in Order No. 587-V for NAESB to Evaluate the Use of the Terms ``Operating Capacity'' and ``Design Capacity'' 18. In Order No. 587-V, the Commission directed the industry, through NAESB, to consider whether the term ``Operating Capacity,'' found in NAESB WGQ Standard No. 0.3.19 and related standards,\28\ and ``Design Capacity,'' found in section 284.13(d) of the Commission's regulations, are functionally equivalent,\29\ and to include this information as part of the next version of the NAESB WGQ Standards.\30\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ NAESB defines Operating Capacity as ``the total capacity which could be scheduled at (or through) the identified point, segment or zone in the indicated direction of flow.'' \29\ In Order No. 587-V, the Commission explained that while pipelines that post both design and operating capacity, often report the same number for both types of capacity, they may sometimes report differences between operating and design capacity. See Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at P 30, n.41. \30\ Id. P 30. NAESB also states it proposes to correct typographical errors and to clarify that ``All Quantities Available Indicator'' in NAESB WGQ Dataset 0.4.2 applies to all quantities at a specific identified point, segment, or zone. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19. In response, NAESB states that a consensus could not be reached for a detailed definition of the term ``Design Capacity'' and that ``Design Capacity'' and ``Operating Capacity'' are not equivalent terms and therefore proposed to include both terms as separately reportable items.\31\ NAESB modified WGQ Dataset 0.4.2 to provide a definition of terms: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ NAESB also states it proposes to correct typographical errors and to clarify that ``All Quantities Available Indicator'' in NAESB WGQ Dataset 0.4.2 applies to all quantities at a specific identified point, segment, or zone. Design capacity is the design capacity of the point, segment, or zone as required by the applicable regulatory authority. Operating Capacity is the total capacity which could be scheduled at (or through) the identified point, segment or zone in the indicated direction of flow. Total scheduled quantity is the net quantity scheduled at the point, segment or zone level in the indicated direction of flow. Operationally available capacity is the quantity remaining that is available to be scheduled at (or through) the identified point, segment or zone, in the indicated direction of --------------------------------------------------------------------------- flow. The Commission finds reasonable NAESB's approach of separately reporting both ``Design Capacity'' and ``Operating Capacity'' as part of the reporting data set as this will provide shippers and the Commission with added information. Accordingly, the Commission proposes to incorporate by reference revised WGQ Standards 0.3.18, 0.3.20, and 0.3.21, and Dataset 0.4.2, as the revised standards and dataset meet the Commission's past concerns and no longer conflict with section 284.13(d) of the Commission's regulations. D. Standards Previously Not Incorporated by Reference 1. Contracts Standards and eTariff Related Standards 20. The Commission proposes to continue its past practice of not incorporating by reference into its regulations any optional contracts, because the Commission does not require the use of these contracts.\32\ In addition, consistent with our findings in past proceedings, the Commission is not proposing to incorporate by reference the WEQ/WGQ eTariff Related Standards, because the Commission has already adopted standards and protocols for electronic tariff filings based on the NAESB Standards.\33\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at n.11. \33\ See Electronic Tariff Filings, Order No. 714, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,276 (2008). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Record Retention Standards 21. In past rulemakings, the Commission declined to incorporate by reference WGQ Standards 4.3.4 and 10.3.2, because the Commission found they were inconsistent with the Commission's record retention requirement in 18 CFR 284.12(b)(3)(v).\34\ In Version 3.0, NAESB deleted WGQ Standards 4.3.4 and 10.3.2. NAESB asserts that deleting the standards avoids any potential conflict between the WGQ Standards and the Commission mandated requirements for regulated entities or the retention policies of non-regulated entities. Thus, the Version 3.0 Standards that the Commission is considering for incorporation by reference no longer conflict with Commission regulations regarding storage retention. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \34\ See, e.g., Standards for Business Practices for Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, Final Rule, Order No. 587-T, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,289, at P 5 & n.9 (2009); see also Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at P 8. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. WGQ Interpretations 22. In past rulemakings, the Commission also declined to incorporate by reference into the Commission's regulations NAESB's interpretations of NAESB WGQ business practice standards because, while interpretations may provide useful guidance, they are not determinative.\35\ In the Version 3.0 Standards, NAESB deleted the interpretations of standards. NAESB states that the WGQ decided that, where greater clarity was needed to make standards more easily understood, it modified and/or added new standards to provide additional clarity, rather than adopting interpretations.\36\ NAESB states that moving forward, the WGQ will evaluate new requests for clarifications or interpretations on a case-by-case basis and plans to work with the requestor to determine if the request would be more appropriately framed as a request for a minor correction or a request for a new and/or modified standard. NAESB asserts that this approach is similar to the one used by the Wholesale Electric Quadrant. Thus, there are no NAESB interpretations of its business practice standards for the Commission to decline to incorporate by reference. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at P 28. \36\ In its Version 3.0 Standards, the WGQ revised Standards 1.1.3, 1.2.2, 1.3.3, 1.3.15, 1.3.22, 2.3.9, 2.3.14, 2.3.15, 2.3.26, 3.3.14, 3.3.15, and 4.3.23; added Standard 0.2.5; and deleted Standard 3.3.2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- E. Proposed Implementation Procedures 23. The Commission anticipates acting on the proposed rule in order to [[Page 43983]] permit these standards to become effective April 1, 2016 at the same time as the Gas-Electric Harmonization standards, with compliance filings due February 1, 2016. Requiring implementation on the same date should reduce the compliance burden on the pipelines and avoid confusion. Requests for waivers that do not meet the requirements set forth in Order No. 587-V will not be granted. In particular, as we explained in Order No. 587-V, waivers are unnecessary and will not be granted when the standard applies only on condition the pipeline performs a business function and the pipeline currently does not perform that function.\37\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at P 38(2). For example, the Commission has denied waivers of NAESB's gas- electric operational communications standards requested by pipelines on the grounds that their systems do not connect to power plants. Trans-Union Interstate Pipeline L.P, 141 FERC ] 61,167, at P 18 (2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24. The Commission is proposing to continue the compliance filing requirements as revised in Order No. 587-V.\38\ As the Commission found in Order No. 587-V, adoption of the revised compliance filing requirements increases the transparency of the pipelines' incorporation by reference of the NAESB WGQ Standards so that shippers and the Commission will know which tariff provision(s) implements each standard as well as the status of each standard.\39\ Likewise, consistent with past practice, the Commission will post on its eLibrary Web site (under Docket No. RM96-1-038) a sample tariff format, to provide filers an illustrative example to aid them in preparing their compliance filings. Requests for waivers need to comply with the requirements of Order No. 587-V.\40\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \38\ Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at PP 36-37. \39\ Id. P 36. To accomplish this, the Commission gave instructions on how pipelines should designate sections in their tariff filings. \40\ Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at PP 38-41. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25. Consistent with our practice in Order No. 587-V, the pipelines should designate a single tariff section under which every NAESB standard incorporated by reference by the Commission is listed.\41\ The pipeline tariff filings should list all the incorporated standards with which the pipeline will comply. In addition, for any standard that the pipeline seeks approval not to comply with, the tariff filing must identify the standard in question and either identify the provision in its tariff that complies with the standard; \42\ or provide an explanation of any waiver, extension of time, or other variance with respect to compliance with the standard that would excuse compliance.\43\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \41\ This section should be a separate tariff record under the Commission's electronic tariff filing requirement and be filed electronically using the eTariff portal using the Type of Filing Code 580. \42\ For example, pipelines are required to include the full text of the NAESB nomination timeline standards (WGQ Standards 1.3.2(i-v) and 5.3.2) in their tariffs. Standards for Business Practices for Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, Final Rule, Order No. 587-U, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,307, at P 39 & n. 42 (2010). The pipeline would indicate which tariff provision complies with each of these standards. \43\ Shippers can use the Commission's electronic tariff system to locate the tariff record containing the NAESB standards, which will indicate the docket number in which any waiver or extension of time was granted. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26. If the pipeline is requesting a continuation of an existing waiver or extension of time, it must include a table in its transmittal letter that identifies the standard for which a waiver or extension of time was granted, and the docket number or order citation to the proceeding in which the waiver or extension was granted. It must also present an explanation for why such waiver or extension should remain in force with regard to the WGQ Version 3.0 Business Practice Standards. 27. This continues the Commission's practice of having pipelines including in their tariffs a common location that identifies the way the pipeline is incorporating all the NAESB WGQ Standards and the standards with which it is required to comply. As explained above, the Commission will post on its eLibrary Web site (under Docket No. RM96-1- 038) a sample tariff format, to provide filers an illustrative example to aid them in preparing their compliance filings.\44\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \44\ http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Notice of Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards 28. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-119 (section 11) (February 10, 1998) provides that federal agencies should publish a request for comment in a NOPR when the agency is seeking to issue or revise a regulation proposing to adopt a voluntary consensus standard or a government-unique standard. In this NOPR, the Commission is proposing to incorporate by reference voluntary consensus standards developed by the WGQ. IV. Incorporation by Reference 29. The Office of the Federal Register requires agencies incorporating material by reference in final rules to discuss, in the preamble of the final rule, the ways that the materials it incorporates by reference are reasonably available to interested parties and how interested parties can obtain the materials.\45\ The regulations also require agencies to summarize, in the preamble of the final rule, the material it incorporates by reference. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \45\ 1 CFR 51.5. See Incorporation by Reference, 79 FR 66267 (Nov. 7, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30. The NAESB standards we are proposing in this NOPR to incorporate by reference are summarized in paragraphs 3-6 above. Our regulations provide that copies of the NAESB standards incorporated by reference may be obtained from the North American Energy Standards Board, 801 Travis Street, Suite 1675, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 356-0060. NAESB's Web site is at http://www.naesb.org/. Copies may be inspected at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Phone: (202) 502-8371, http://www.ferc.gov.\46\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \46\ 18 CFR 284.12. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 31. NAESB is a private consensus standards developer that develops voluntary wholesale and retail standards related to the energy industry. The procedures used by NAESB make its standards reasonably available to those affected by the Commission regulations, which is comprised of entities that have the means to acquire the information they need to effectively participate in Commission proceedings. Participants can join NAESB, for an annual membership cost of only $7,000, which entitles them to full participation in NAESB and enables them to obtain these standards at no additional cost.\47\ Non-members may obtain the Individual Standards Manual or Booklets for each of the seven Manuals by email for $250 per manual, which in the case of these standards would total $1,750.\48\ Nonmembers also may obtain the complete set of Standards Manuals, Booklets, and Contracts on CD for $2,000. NAESB also provides a free electronic read-only version of the standards for a three business day period or, in the case of a regulatory comment period, through the end of the comment period.\49\ In addition, NAESB considers requests for waivers of the [[Page 43984]] charges on a case-by-case basis depending on need. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \47\ North American Energy Standards Board Membership Application, https://www.naesb.org/pdf4/naesbapp.pdf. \48\ NAESB Materials Order Form, https://www.naesb.org//pdf/ordrform.pdf. \49\ Procedures for non-members to evaluate work products before purchasing, https://www.naesb.org/misc/NAESB_Nonmember_Evaluation.pdf. See Incorporation by Reference, 79 FR at 66271, n. 51 & 53 (Nov. 7, 2014) (citing to NAESB's procedure of providing ``no-cost, no-print electronic access'', NAESB Comment, at 1, available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=OFR-2013-0001-0023). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- V. Information Collection Statement 32. The following collections of information contained in this proposed rule are being submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507(d). Upon approval of a collection(s) of information, OMB will assign an OMB control number and an expiration date. Respondents subject to the filing requirements of a rule will not be penalized for failing to respond to these collections of information unless the collections of information display a valid OMB control number. 33. The Commission solicits comments on the Commission's need for this information, whether the information will have practical utility, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondents' burden, including the use of automated information techniques. Public Reporting Burden: The Commission's burden estimates for the proposals in this NOPR are for one-time implementation of the information collection requirements of this NOPR (including tariff filing, documentation of the process and procedures, and IT work). The collections of information related to this NOPR fall under FERC-545 (Gas Pipeline Rates: Rate Change (Non-Formal)) \50\ and FERC-549C (Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines).\51\ The following estimates of reporting burden are related only to this NOPR and anticipate the costs to pipelines for compliance with the Commission's proposals in this NOPR.\52\ The burden estimates are primarily related to start-up to implement these standards and regulations and will not result in ongoing costs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \50\ FERC-545 covers rate change filings made by natural gas pipelines, including tariff changes. \51\ FERC-549C covers Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines. \52\ We note that although this NOPR proposes a minor revision to section 260.8, we are not including Form No. 567 (OMB No. 1902- 005) as part of this burden estimate because we estimate that the substitution of proprietary codes for common codes in the system flow diagrams submitted under section 260.8 will not increase the burden of filing that form. The same is true with regard to the identical revisions we are proposing to sections 157.14 and 157.18, Form No. 537 (OMB No. 1902-0060). Likewise, we estimate that our proposed revision to Form 549B (OMB No. 1902-0169), see http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/forms.asp, which changes the point record for Point identification Code Qualifier (Item ID yj) and Point Identification Code (Item ID yk) will not increase the burden of filing that form. RM96-1-038, Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total annual Number of Annual number of Total number of Average burden & burden hours & Cost per respondents \53\ responses per responses cost per total annual respondent \54\ respondent response cost ($) (1) (2) (1) * (2) = (3) (4) (3) * (4) = (5) (5) / (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FERC-545 \55\............................... 165 1 165 10 1,650 $138,056 FERC-549C................................... 165 1 165 22 3,630 303,722 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Totals.................................. ................ ................ ................ ................ 5,280 441,778 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Information Collection Costs: The Commission seeks comments on the costs to comply with these requirements. It has projected the average annualized cost for all respondents to be the following: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \53\ The number of respondents is the number of entities in which a change in burden from the current standards to the proposed exists, not the total number of entities from the current or proposed standards that are applicable. \54\ Wage data is based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics data for 2012 (``May 2012 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, [for] Sector 22--Utilities'' at http://bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm) and is compiled for the top 10 percent earned. For the estimate of the benefits component, see http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm. \55\ The mean hourly cost of tariff filings and implementation for interstate natural gas pipelines is $83.67. This represents the average composite wage (salary and benefits for 2,080 annual work- hours) of the following occupational categories: ``Legal'' ($128.02 per hour), ``Computer Analyst'' ($83.50 per hour), and ``Office and Administrative'' ($39.49 per hour). Wage data is available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm and is compiled for the top 10 percent earned. For the estimate of the benefits component, see http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FERC-545 FERC-549C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Annualized Capital/Startup Costs........ $138,056 $303,722 Annualized Costs (Operations & N/A N/A Maintenance)........................... ------------------------------- Total Annualized Costs.............. 138,056 303,722 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total Cost for all Respondents = $441,778. OMB regulations require OMB to approve certain information collection requirements imposed by agency rule. The Commission is submitting notification of this proposed rule to OMB. These information collections are mandatory requirements. Title: FERC-545, Gas Pipeline Rates: Rates Change (Non-Formal); FERC-549C, Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines. Action: Proposed collections. OMB Control Nos.: 1902-0154, 1902-0174. Respondents: Business or other for profit, (i.e., Natural Gas Pipelines, applicable to only a few small businesses.) Although the intraday reporting requirements will affect electric plant operators, the Commission is not imposing the reporting burden of adopting these standards on those entities. Frequency of Responses: One-time implementation (business procedures, capital/start-up). Necessity of Information: The proposals in this NOPR would, if implemented, upgrade the Commission's current business practices and communication standards by specifically: (1) Requiring the posting of information on requests to purchase [[Page 43985]] releasable capacity on a pipeline's Web site; (2) revising standards to support the elimination of NAESB WGQ interpretations; (3) revising standards to add new data elements; and (4) revising standards related to the technical implementation and data sets for the NAESB WGQ Standards. The implementation of these data requirements will provide additional transparency to informational posting Web sites and will improve communication standards, including gas-electric communications. The implementation of these standards and regulations will promote the additional efficiency and reliability of the gas industries' operations thereby helping the Commission to carry out its responsibilities under the Natural Gas Act of promoting the efficiency and reliability of the gas industries' operations. In addition, the Commission's Office of Enforcement will use the data for general industry oversight. Internal Review: The Commission has reviewed the requirements pertaining to business practices of natural gas pipelines and made a preliminary determination that the proposed revisions are necessary to establish more efficient coordination between the gas and electric industries. Requiring such information ensures both a common means of communication and common business practices to limit miscommunication for participants engaged in the sale of electric energy at wholesale and the transportation of natural gas. These requirements conform to the Commission's plan for efficient information collection, communication, and management within the natural gas pipeline industries. The Commission has assured itself, by means of its internal review, that there is specific, objective support for the burden estimates associated with the information requirements. 34. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting requirements by contacting the following: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: Ellen Brown, Office of the Executive Director, email: [email protected], phone: (202) 502-8663, fax: (202) 273-0873]. 35. Comments concerning the collection of information(s) and the associated burden estimate(s), should be sent to the contact listed above and to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503 [Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, telephone: (202) 395- 0710, fax: (202) 395-4718]. VI. Environmental Analysis 36. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may have a significant adverse effect on the human environment.\56\ The Commission has categorically excluded certain actions from these requirements as not having a significant effect on the human environment.\57\ The actions proposed here fall within categorical exclusions in the Commission's regulations for rules that are clarifying, corrective, or procedural, for information gathering, analysis, and dissemination, and for sales, exchange, and transportation of natural gas that requires no construction of facilities.\58\ Therefore, an environmental assessment is unnecessary and has not been prepared as part of this NOPR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \56\ Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs. Regulations Preambles 1986-1990 ] 30,783 (1987). \57\ 18 CFR 380.4. \58\ See 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii), 380.4(a)(5), 380.4(a)(27). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis and Certification 37. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) \59\ generally requires a description and analysis of proposed rules that will have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The RFA mandates consideration of regulatory alternatives that accomplish the stated objectives of a proposed rule and that minimize any significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Small Business Administration's (SBA) Office of Size Standards develops the numerical definition of a small business.\60\ The SBA has established a size standard for pipelines transporting natural gas, stating that a firm is small if its annual receipts are less than $25.5 million.\61\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \59\ 5 U.S.C. 601-612. \60\ 13 CFR 121.101. \61\ 13 CFR 121.201, subsection 486. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 38. The regulations proposed here impose requirements only on interstate pipelines, the majority of which are not small businesses. Most companies regulated by the Commission do not fall within the RFA's definition of a small entity. Approximately 165 entities are potential respondents subject to data collection FERC-545 reporting requirements and also are subject to data collection FERC 549-C reporting requirements. Nearly all of these entities are large entities. For the year 2012 (the most recent year for which information is available), only eleven companies not affiliated with larger companies had annual revenues of less than $25.5 million and are defined by the SBA as ``small entities.'' These companies constitute about seven percent of the total universe of potential respondents. The Commission estimates that the one-time implementation cost of the proposals in this NOPR is $441,778 (or $2,677 per entity, regardless of entity size).\62\ The Commission does not consider the estimated $2,677 impact per entity to be significant. Moreover, these requirements are designed to benefit all customers, including small businesses that must comply with them. Further, as noted above, adoption of consensus standards helps ensure the reasonableness of the standards by requiring that the standards draw support from a broad spectrum of industry participants representing all segments of the industry. Because of that representation and the fact that industry conducts business under these standards, the Commission's regulations should reflect those standards that have the widest possible support. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \62\ This number is derived by dividing the total cost figure by the number of respondents. $441,778/165 = $2,677. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 39. Accordingly, pursuant to Sec. 605(b) of the RFA,\63\ the regulations proposed herein should not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \63\ 5 U.S.C. 605(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VIII. Comment Procedures 40. The Commission invites interested persons to submit comments on the matters and issues proposed in this notice to be adopted, including any related matters or alternative proposals that commenters may wish to discuss. Comments are due August 24, 2015. Comments must refer to Docket No. RM96-1-038, and must include the commenter's name, the organization they represent, if applicable, and their address in their comments. 41. The Commission encourages comments to be filed electronically via the eFiling link on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov. The Commission accepts most standard word processing formats. Documents created electronically using word processing software should be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format and not in a scanned format. Commenters filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing. 42. Commenters that are not able to file comments electronically must send [[Page 43986]] an original of their comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. 43. All comments will be placed in the Commission's public files and may be viewed, printed, or downloaded remotely as described in the Document Availability section below. Commenters on this proposal are not required to serve copies of their comments on other commenters. IX. Document Availability 44. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the Internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission's Public Reference Room during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. 45. From the Commission's Home Page on the Internet, this information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket number field. 46. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's Web site during normal business hours from the Commission's Online Support at (202) 502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at [email protected], or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502- 8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. Email the Public Reference Room at [email protected]. List of Subjects in 18 CFR Parts 157, 260, and 284 Incorporation by reference, Natural gas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. By direction of the Commission. Issued: July 16, 2015. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary. In consideration of the foregoing, the Commission proposes to amend parts 157, 260, and 284, chapter I, title 18, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows. PART 157--APPLICATIONS FOR CERTIFICATES OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AND FOR ORDERS PERMITTING AND APPROVING ABANDONMENT UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE NATURAL GAS ACT 0 1. The authority citation for part 157 continues to read as follows: Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717-717Z. 0 2. Section 157.14 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: Sec. 157.14 Exhibits. (a) To be attached to each application. All exhibits specified must accompany each application when tendered for filing. Together with each exhibit applicant must provide a full and complete explanation of the data submitted, the manner in which it was obtained, and the reasons for the conclusions derived from the exhibits. If the Commission determines that a formal hearing upon the application is required or that testimony and hearing exhibits should be filed, the Secretary will promptly notify the applicant that submittal of all exhibits and testimony of all witnesses to be sponsored by the applicant in support of his case-in-chief is required. Submittal of these exhibits and testimony must be within 20 days from the date of the Secretary's notice, or any other time as the Secretary will specify. Exhibits, except exhibits F, F-1, G, G-I, G-II, and H(iv), must be submitted to the Commission on electronic media as prescribed in Sec. 385.2011 of this chapter. Receipt and delivery point information required in various exhibits must be labeled with a location point name in accordance with the name adopted in Sec. 284.12 of this chapter. * * * * * 0 3. Section 157.18 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows: Sec. 157.18 Applications to abandon facilities or service; exhibits. * * * * * (c) Exhibit V--Flow diagram showing daily design capacity and reflecting operation of applicant's system after abandonment. Receipt and delivery point information required in various exhibits must be labeled with a location point name in accordance with the name adopted in Sec. 284.12 of this chapter. A flow diagram showing daily design capacity and reflecting operating conditions of applicant's system after abandonment of facilities on that segment of the system affected by the abandonment, including the following: * * * * * PART 260--STATEMENTS AND REPORTS (SCHEDULES) 0 4. The authority citation for part 260 continues to read as follows: Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717-717w, 3301-3432; 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352. 0 5. Section 260.8 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: Sec. 260.8 System flow diagrams: Format No. FERC 567. (a) Each Major natural gas pipeline company, having a system delivery capacity in excess of 100,000 Mcf per day (measured at 14.73 p.s.i.a. and 60 [deg]F), shall file with the Commission by June 1 of each year five (5) copies of a diagram or diagrams reflecting operating conditions on its main transmission system during the previous twelve months ended December 31. For purposes of system peak deliveries, the heating season overlapping the year's end shall be used. Facilities shall be those installed and in operation on December 31 of the reporting year. All volumes shall be reported on a uniform stated pressure and temperature base. Receipt and delivery point information required in various exhibits must be labeled with a location point name in accordance with the name adopted in Sec. 284.12 of this chapter. * * * * * PART 284--CERTAIN SALES AND TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS UNDER THE NATURAL GAS POLICY ACT OF 1978 AND RELATED AUTHORITIES 0 6. The authority citation for part 284 continues to read as follows: Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717-717w, 3301-3432; 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352; 43 U.S.C. 1331-1356. 0 7. Section 284.12 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows: Sec. 284.12 Standards for pipeline business operations and communications. (a) * * * (1) An interstate pipeline that transports gas under subparts B or G of this part must comply with the business practices and electronic communications standards as promulgated by the North American Energy Standards Board, as incorporated herein by reference in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) thru (vii) of this section, and as revised by Minor Correction/Clarification MC15009 and Minor Correction/Clarification MC15012, as incorporated herein by reference in paragraphs (a)(1)(viii) and (ix) of this section. [[Page 43987]] (i) Additional Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014); (ii) Nominations Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014); (iii) Flowing Gas Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014); (iv) Invoicing Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014); (v) Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014); (vi) Capacity Release Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014); (vii) Internet Electronic Transport Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014); (viii) Minor Correction/Clarification, Request No. MC15009, approved April 30, 2015; and (ix) Minor Correction/Clarification, Request No. MC15012, approved May 29, 2015. * * * * * 0 8. Section 284.13 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(2)(vi) to read as follows: Sec. 284.13 Reporting requirements for interstate pipelines. * * * * * (c) * * * (2) * * * (vi) The receipt and delivery points and the zones or segments covered by the contract in which the capacity is held, including the location code for each point zone or segment along with a posting on the pipeline's Web site that identifies active and inactive points, the date the point becomes active or inactive, the location of the point, and an identification of the upstream or downstream entity, if any, at that point; * * * * * Note: The following appendix will not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations. Appendix List of Revisions in NAESB's WGQ Version 3.0 Business Practice Standards to Its Prior Business Practice Standards Version 3.0 makes the following changes to the Version 2.1 Standards: a. Revises Standards 0.3.28, 1.1.3, 1.3.1, 1.3.2 through 1.3.5, 1.3.7 through 1.3.9, 1.3.11, 1.3.13 through 1.3.15, 1.3.22, 1.3.27, 1.3.33, 1.3.41, 1.3.42, 1.3.51, 1.3.80, 2.3.5, 2.3.9, 2.3.14, 2.3.15, 2.3.21, 2.3.26, 2.3.40, 2.3.46, 2.3.47, 3.3.3, 3.3.7, 3.3.14, 3.3.15, 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 4.3.16, 4.3.23, 4.3.35, 4.3.45, 4.3.46, 4.3.54, 4.3.90, 5.3.2, 5.3.32, 5.3.44, 5.3.45, 5.3.48, 5.3.49, 5.3.53, 5.3.54, 5.3.56; Datasets 0.4.1, 0.4.2, 0.4.4, 1.4.1 through 1.4.7, 2.4.1 through 2.4.11, 2.4.17, 2.4.18, 3.4.1 through 3.4.4, 5.4.14 through 5.4.17, 5.4.20 through 5.4.27; Principles 1.1.15, 1.1.18, 2.1.5; and Definitions 1.2.2, 1.2.4, 2.2.5. b. Adds Standards 0.2.5, 4.3.105, 5.3.73. c. Deletes Standards 1.3.52, 2.3.49, 3.3.2, 3.3.20, 4.3.4, 4.3.39, 4.3.65, 5.3.27, 10.3.2; Datasets 2.4.12 through 2.4.16; and Principles 1.1.5, 1.1.7, 1.1.9, 1.1.17, 4.1.31. Version 2.1 made the following changes to the Version 2.0 Standards: a. Revises Standards 0.3.18, 0.3.20, 0.3.21, 1.3.27, 1.3.55, 1.3.73, 2.3.32, 4.3.23, 4.3.28, 4.3.35, 4.3.52, 4.3.67, 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.26, 5.3.38, 5.3.70, 5.3.71, 6.5.2, 7.3.16, 7.3.27; Datasets 0.4.1 through 0.4.3, 1.4.1 through 1.4.7, 2.4.1 through 2.4.7, 2.4.9 through 2.4.11, 2.4.13 through 2.4.18, 3.4.1 through 3.4.4, 5.4.14 through 5.4.17, 5.4.20 through 5.4.22, 5.4.24 through 5.4.26; and Definitions 10.2.8, 10.2.30. b. Adds Standards 0.3.23 through 0.3.29, 1.3.58, 1.3.73, 1.3.81, 2.3.66, 4.3.103, 4.3.104; and Dataset 0.4.4. c. Deletes Standards 0.3.19, 1.3.47, 1.3.49, 1.3.50, 1.3.54, 1.3.57, 1.3.59 through 1.3.61, 1.3.63, 2.3.33 through 2.3.35, 3.3.1, 4.3.39, 4.3.51, 4.3.56, 4.3.59, 4.3.73, 4.3.74, 4.3.76. [FR Doc. 2015-17921 Filed 7-23-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules 43979
(s) New One-Time Surface HFEC Inspections (u) Related Information revise the codes used to identify receipt
Do a surface HFEC inspection of the (1) For more information about this AD, and delivery locations in the Index of
tension tie center section, for cracking in the contact Bill Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer, Customers. In addition, for consistency
forward and aft tension tie channels between Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle with the revisions to the Index of
STA 1120 through 1220, in accordance with Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Customers, the Commission is
Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; proposing certain conforming changes
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2559, phone: 425–917–6432; fax: 425–917–6590;
email: bill.ashforth@faa.gov. to the Commission’s regulations on
Revision 2, dated May 13, 2014. Do the
inspection at the applicable time specified in (2) For service information identified in exhibits and on system flow diagrams.
Table 1 or Table 3 of paragraph 1.E, this AD, contact Boeing Commercial DATES: Comments are due August 24,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 2015.
Bulletin 747–53A2559, Revision 2, dated Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC
May 13, 2014, except where paragraph 1.E., D800–0019, Long Beach, CA 90846–0001; ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service telephone 206–544–5000, extension 2; fax docket number, may be filed in the
Bulletin 747–53A2559, Revision 2, dated 206–766–5683; Internet https:// following ways:
May 13, 2014, specifies a compliance time www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA, • Electronic Filing through http://
relative to ‘‘the Revision 2 date of this service
bulletin,’’ this AD requires compliance Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind www.ferc.gov. Documents created
within the specified compliance time after Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information electronically using word processing
the effective date of this AD. If any crack is on the availability of this material at the software should be filed in native
found, before further flight, repair the crack FAA, call 425–227–1221. applications or print-to-PDF format and
using a method approved in accordance with not in a scanned format.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 16,
the procedures specified in paragraph (t) of
2015. • Mail/Hand Delivery: Those unable
this AD.
Suzanne Masterson, to file electronically may mail or hand-
(t) Alternative Methods of Compliance
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
deliver comments to: Federal Energy
(AMOCs) Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft [FR Doc. 2015–18152 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am]
Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the Washington, DC 20426.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if Instructions: For detailed instructions
requested using the procedures found in 14 on submitting comments and additional
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
information on the rulemaking process,
send your request to your principal inspector DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
or local Flight Standards District Office, as see the Comment Procedures section of
appropriate. If sending information directly Federal Energy Regulatory this document.
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the Commission FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
attention of the person identified in Stanley Wolf (technical issues), Office of
paragraph (u)(1) of this AD. Information may 18 CFR Parts 157, 260, and 284 Energy Policy and Innovation, Federal
be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-
Requests@faa.gov. [Docket No. RM96–1–038] Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426,
notify your appropriate principal inspector, Standards for Business Practices of Telephone: (202) 502–6841, Email:
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines stanley.wolf@ferc.gov.
of the local flight standards district office/ Oscar F. Santillana (technical issues),
certificate holding district office. AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory
Office of Energy Market Regulation,
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable Commission.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
level of safety may be used for any repair ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
required by this AD if it is approved by the
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization SUMMARY: The Federal Energy 20426, Telephone: (202) 502–6392,
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has Regulatory Commission (Commission) is Email: oscar.santillana@ferc.gov.
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle proposing to amend its regulations to Gary D. Cohen (legal issues), Office of
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair incorporate by reference, with certain the General Counsel, Federal Energy
method to be approved, the repair must meet enumerated exceptions, the latest Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
the certification basis of the airplane, and the NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone:
version (Version 3.0) of business
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
practice standards adopted by the (202) 502–8321, Email: gary.cohen@
(4) AMOCs approved previously for AD
2012–15–13, Amendment 39–17142 (77 FR Wholesale Gas Quadrant of the North ferc.gov.
47267, August 8, 2012), are approved as American Energy Standards Board
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of (NAESB) applicable to natural gas
this AD. pipelines. These revisions, in part, Table of Contents
Paragraph Nos.
I. Background ................................................................................................................................................................................ 2
II. Discussion ................................................................................................................................................................................ 8
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Modifications to Standards to Support the Commission’s Show Cause Order in Docket No. RP14–442–000 .......... 12
B. Location Codes .................................................................................................................................................................. 15
C. Request in Order No. 587–V for NAESB to Evaluate the Use of the Terms ‘‘Operating Capacity’’ and ‘‘Design Ca-
pacity’’ ................................................................................................................................................................................ 18
D. Standards Previously Not Incorporated by Reference .................................................................................................... 20
1. Contracts Standards and eTariff Related Standards ................................................................................................ 20
2. Record Retention Standards ...................................................................................................................................... 21
3. WGQ Interpretations .................................................................................................................................................. 22
E. Proposed Implementation Procedures ............................................................................................................................. 23
III. Notice of Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards ................................................................................................................ 28
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM 24JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_44121/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules 43981
capacity release standards regarding benefit of the entire wholesale natural 13. In response, NAESB proposes to
posting requirements for offers to gas market. modify WGQ Standard 4.3.23 to add
purchase released capacity that were the 10. As the Commission found in ‘‘Request to Purchase Releasable
subject of the Commission’s order to Order No. 587, adoption of consensus Capacity’’ as a subcategory of
show cause in Docket No. RP14–442– standards is appropriate because the information contained in a
000.14 Other revisions in the Version 3.0 consensus process helps ensure the transportation service provider’s
Standards are: (1) Revisions to the reasonableness of the standards by information postings Web site. NAESB
standards to define ‘‘Operating requiring that the standards draw also proposes to add new WGQ
Capacity’’ and ‘‘Design Capacity’’ in support from a broad spectrum of Standard 5.3.73, containing
response to the Commission request in industry participants representing all requirements regarding requests to
Order No. 587–V; 15 (2) elimination of segments of the industry.21 Moreover, purchase capacity that is releasable.
the WGQ Interpretations, which the because the industry has to conduct 14. The Commission proposes to
Commission declined to incorporate by business under these standards, the incorporate by reference revised WGQ
reference; (3) modifications to standards Commission’s regulations should reflect Standard 4.3.23 and WGQ Standard
to reflect the interpretations; (4) those standards that have the widest 5.3.73. We note, however, that our
modifications for maintenance possible support. In section 12(d) of the proposal to incorporate WGQ Standard
purposes, which includes changes to National Technology Transfer and 5.3.73 by reference is not intended to
eliminate the appearance of the Advancement Act of 1995 (NTT&AA), eliminate any posting requirements
electronic data interchange in the Congress affirmatively requires federal additionally imposed by the
imbalance trading process; (5) agencies to use technical standards Commission in Docket No. RP14–442–
modifications to reflect new data developed by voluntary consensus 000.
elements; and (6) edits for clarity and to standards organizations, like NAESB, as B. Location Codes
increase user-friendliness. The Version a means to carry out policy objectives or
3.0 standards have also been revised to 15. NAESB has proposed to revise its
activities.22 standards regarding the use of location
include 29 minor corrections.16
11. We discuss below some specific codes. The industry has determined that
7. On July 7, 2015, NAESB filed a
aspects of the filing. having a third party maintain a common
report informing the Commission that it
has made errata corrections to the WGQ A. Modifications to Standards To code database is not worth the expense
Version 3.0 Business Practice Support the Commission’s Show Cause and effort and has revised the prior
Standards.17 These corrections Order in Docket No. RP14–442–000 standards to introduce the use of
incorporate a 9:00 a.m. Central Clock proprietary codes to identify the
Time (CCT) start to the gas operating 12. On March 20, 2014, the location of points of receipt and
day, consistent with the Commission’s Commission issued an Order to Show delivery. The revised standards include
findings in Order No. 809 18 and also Cause in Docket No. RP14–442–000,23 requirements for the pipelines to post
correct other minor errors. which required all interstate pipelines on their Web sites information on each
to either revise their respective tariffs to of the proprietary points that can be
II. Discussion provide for the posting of offers to used to determine which points are
8. In this NOPR, the Commission purchase released capacity as required interconnecting points between
proposes to incorporate by reference, in by section 284.8(d) of the Commission’s pipelines, one of the primary reasons for
its regulations, Version 3.0 of the regulations,24 or to demonstrate that adoption of the common code database.
NAESB WGQ’s consensus business their existing tariffs are in full These codes are also used by the
practice standards,19 with certain compliance with that section. In the Commission in its Index of Customers to
exceptions.20 We propose that the Show Cause Order, the Commission also identify the points on shippers’
implementation date for these standards requested that NAESB develop certain contracts and we propose to revise
coincide with the implementation of the business practice and communications section 284.13(c) of the regulations to
Gas-Electric Coordination standards on standards specifying: (1) The coordinate with this change.
April 1, 2016. information required for requests to 16. We propose to incorporate by
9. Adoption of the Version 3.0 acquire capacity; (2) the methods by reference these revised standards, as
Standards will continue the process of which such information is to be they are based on an industry
updating and improving NAESB’s exchanged; and (3) the location of the consensus, will reduce industry’s costs
business practice standards for the information on a pipeline’s Internet to support the retention of common
Web site.25 codes, and because the changes will
14 Posting of Offers to Purchase Capacity, 146 maintain the ability of shippers and
FERC ¶ 61,203, at P 6 (2014) (Show Cause Order); 21 The NAESB process first requires a super- others to identify interconnection points
B–R Pipeline Co., 149 FERC ¶ 61,031 (2014) (order majority vote of 17 out of 25 members of the WGQ’s between pipelines. Given the ability of
accepting compliance filings). Executive Committee with support from at least two
15 Order No. 587–V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,332
the Commission and customers to
members from each of the five industry segments—
at P 8. Distributors, End Users, Pipelines, Producers, and
continue to identify interconnection
16 The NAESB Version 3.0 Report also provides Services (including marketers and computer service points referenced in the Index of
information on other NAESB activities and tools providers). For final approval, 67 percent of the Customers, the Commission finds that
unrelated to standards development. WGQ’s general membership voting must ratify the the revised code standards appear to
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
17 NAESB adopted two minor corrections, standards.
satisfy the requirements for the Index of
MC15009 and MC15012, approved on April 30, 22 Pub. L. 104–113, section 12(d), 110 Stat. 775
2015 and May 29, 2015, respectively. (1996), 15 U.S.C. 272, note (1997). Customers and we will modify the
18 Order No. 809, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,368 at 23 Show Cause Order, 146 FERC ¶ 61,203 at P 6. regulations to permit the use of the
P 171. 24 18 CFR 284.8(d). That section states that ‘‘[t]he proprietary codes. In addition, to avoid
19 A list of the revisions NAESB’s WGQ Version pipeline must provide notice of offers to release or any confusion from the use of
3.0 Standards made to prior standards is appended to purchase capacity, the terms and conditions of inconsistent location codes, we propose
to this NOPR. such offers, and the name of any replacement
20 In the discussion below we identify the NAESB shipper . . ., on an Internet Web site, for a to accompany our incorporation by
WGQ Version 3.0 Standards that we propose not to reasonable period.’’ reference of these revised standards
incorporate by reference. 25 Show Cause Order, 146 FERC ¶ 61,203 at P 6. with a proposal to revise our regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM 24JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_44121/page/3.svg)
![43984 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules
charges on a case-by-case basis the collections of information display a (including tariff filing, documentation of
depending on need. valid OMB control number. the process and procedures, and IT
33. The Commission solicits work). The collections of information
V. Information Collection Statement comments on the Commission’s need for related to this NOPR fall under FERC–
this information, whether the 545 (Gas Pipeline Rates: Rate Change
32. The following collections of
information will have practical utility, (Non-Formal)) 50 and FERC–549C
information contained in this proposed
the accuracy of the provided burden (Standards for Business Practices of
rule are being submitted to the Office of estimates, ways to enhance the quality,
Management and Budget (OMB) for Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines).51 The
utility, and clarity of the information to
review under section 3507(d) of the following estimates of reporting burden
be collected, and any suggested methods
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 are related only to this NOPR and
for minimizing respondents’ burden,
U.S.C. 3507(d). Upon approval of a including the use of automated anticipate the costs to pipelines for
collection(s) of information, OMB will information techniques. compliance with the Commission’s
assign an OMB control number and an Public Reporting Burden: The proposals in this NOPR.52 The burden
expiration date. Respondents subject to Commission’s burden estimates for the estimates are primarily related to start-
the filing requirements of a rule will not proposals in this NOPR are for one-time up to implement these standards and
be penalized for failing to respond to implementation of the information regulations and will not result in
these collections of information unless collection requirements of this NOPR ongoing costs.
RM96–1–038, STANDARDS FOR BUSINESS PRACTICES OF INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS PIPELINES
Annual number Average burden Total annual Cost per
Number of Total number of
of responses per & cost per burden hours & respondent 54
respondents 53 responses
respondent response total annual cost ($)
(1) (2) (1) * (2) = (3) (4) (3) * (4) = (5) (5) ÷ (1)
FERC–545 55 .................... 165 1 165 10 1,650 $138,056
FERC–549C ..................... 165 1 165 22 3,630 303,722
Totals ........................ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ 5,280 441,778
Information Collection Costs: The costs to comply with these average annualized cost for all
Commission seeks comments on the requirements. It has projected the respondents to be the following:
FERC–545 FERC–549C
Annualized Capital/Startup Costs ............................................................................................................................ $138,056 $303,722
Annualized Costs (Operations & Maintenance) ...................................................................................................... N/A N/A
Total Annualized Costs .................................................................................................................................... 138,056 303,722
Total Cost for all Respondents = 549C, Standards for Business Practices adopting these standards on those
$441,778. of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines. entities.
OMB regulations require OMB to Action: Proposed collections. Frequency of Responses: One-time
approve certain information collection OMB Control Nos.: 1902–0154, 1902– implementation (business procedures,
requirements imposed by agency rule. 0174. capital/start-up).
The Commission is submitting Respondents: Business or other for Necessity of Information: The
notification of this proposed rule to profit, (i.e., Natural Gas Pipelines, proposals in this NOPR would, if
OMB. These information collections are applicable to only a few small implemented, upgrade the
mandatory requirements. businesses.) Although the intraday Commission’s current business practices
reporting requirements will affect and communication standards by
Title: FERC–545, Gas Pipeline Rates: electric plant operators, the Commission specifically: (1) Requiring the posting of
Rates Change (Non-Formal); FERC– is not imposing the reporting burden of information on requests to purchase
50 FERC–545 covers rate change filings made by 0169), see http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ estimate of the benefits component, see http://
natural gas pipelines, including tariff changes. forms.asp, which changes the point record for Point www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm.
51 FERC–549C covers Standards for Business identification Code Qualifier (Item ID yj) and Point 55 The mean hourly cost of tariff filings and
Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines. Identification Code (Item ID yk) will not increase implementation for interstate natural gas pipelines
the burden of filing that form.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
52 We note that although this NOPR proposes a
53 The number of respondents is the number of
is $83.67. This represents the average composite
minor revision to section 260.8, we are not wage (salary and benefits for 2,080 annual work-
including Form No. 567 (OMB No. 1902–005) as entities in which a change in burden from the
hours) of the following occupational categories:
part of this burden estimate because we estimate current standards to the proposed exists, not the
total number of entities from the current or ‘‘Legal’’ ($128.02 per hour), ‘‘Computer Analyst’’
that the substitution of proprietary codes for
common codes in the system flow diagrams proposed standards that are applicable. ($83.50 per hour), and ‘‘Office and Administrative’’
submitted under section 260.8 will not increase the 54 Wage data is based on the Bureau of Labor ($39.49 per hour). Wage data is available from the
burden of filing that form. The same is true with Statistics data for 2012 (‘‘May 2012 National Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://bls.gov/oes/
regard to the identical revisions we are proposing Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and current/naics2_22.htm and is compiled for the top
to sections 157.14 and 157.18, Form No. 537 (OMB Wage Estimates, [for] Sector 22—Utilities’’ at 10 percent earned. For the estimate of the benefits
No. 1902–0060). Likewise, we estimate that our http://bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm) and is component, see http://www.bls.gov/news.release/
proposed revision to Form 549B (OMB No. 1902– compiled for the top 10 percent earned. For the ecec.nr0.htm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM 24JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_44121/page/6.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules 43985
releasable capacity on a pipeline’s Web telephone: (202) 395–0710, fax: (202) are large entities. For the year 2012 (the
site; (2) revising standards to support 395–4718]. most recent year for which information
the elimination of NAESB WGQ is available), only eleven companies not
VI. Environmental Analysis
interpretations; (3) revising standards to affiliated with larger companies had
add new data elements; and (4) revising 36. The Commission is required to annual revenues of less than $25.5
standards related to the technical prepare an Environmental Assessment million and are defined by the SBA as
implementation and data sets for the or an Environmental Impact Statement ‘‘small entities.’’ These companies
NAESB WGQ Standards. for any action that may have a constitute about seven percent of the
The implementation of these data significant adverse effect on the human total universe of potential respondents.
requirements will provide additional environment.56 The Commission has The Commission estimates that the one-
transparency to informational posting categorically excluded certain actions time implementation cost of the
Web sites and will improve from these requirements as not having a proposals in this NOPR is $441,778 (or
communication standards, including significant effect on the human $2,677 per entity, regardless of entity
gas-electric communications. The environment.57 The actions proposed size).62 The Commission does not
implementation of these standards and here fall within categorical exclusions consider the estimated $2,677 impact
regulations will promote the additional in the Commission’s regulations for per entity to be significant. Moreover,
efficiency and reliability of the gas rules that are clarifying, corrective, or these requirements are designed to
industries’ operations thereby helping procedural, for information gathering, benefit all customers, including small
the Commission to carry out its analysis, and dissemination, and for businesses that must comply with them.
responsibilities under the Natural Gas sales, exchange, and transportation of Further, as noted above, adoption of
Act of promoting the efficiency and natural gas that requires no construction consensus standards helps ensure the
reliability of the gas industries’ of facilities.58 Therefore, an reasonableness of the standards by
operations. In addition, the environmental assessment is requiring that the standards draw
Commission’s Office of Enforcement unnecessary and has not been prepared support from a broad spectrum of
will use the data for general industry as part of this NOPR. industry participants representing all
oversight. VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis segments of the industry. Because of
Internal Review: The Commission has and Certification that representation and the fact that
reviewed the requirements pertaining to industry conducts business under these
37. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of standards, the Commission’s regulations
business practices of natural gas
1980 (RFA) 59 generally requires a should reflect those standards that have
pipelines and made a preliminary
description and analysis of proposed the widest possible support.
determination that the proposed
rules that will have significant 39. Accordingly, pursuant to § 605(b)
revisions are necessary to establish more
economic impact on a substantial of the RFA,63 the regulations proposed
efficient coordination between the gas
number of small entities. The RFA herein should not have a significant
and electric industries. Requiring such
mandates consideration of regulatory economic impact on a substantial
information ensures both a common
alternatives that accomplish the stated number of small entities.
means of communication and common
objectives of a proposed rule and that
business practices to limit VIII. Comment Procedures
minimize any significant economic
miscommunication for participants
impact on a substantial number of small 40. The Commission invites interested
engaged in the sale of electric energy at
entities. The Small Business persons to submit comments on the
wholesale and the transportation of
Administration’s (SBA) Office of Size matters and issues proposed in this
natural gas. These requirements
Standards develops the numerical notice to be adopted, including any
conform to the Commission’s plan for
definition of a small business.60 The related matters or alternative proposals
efficient information collection,
SBA has established a size standard for that commenters may wish to discuss.
communication, and management
pipelines transporting natural gas, Comments are due August 24, 2015.
within the natural gas pipeline
stating that a firm is small if its annual Comments must refer to Docket No.
industries. The Commission has assured
receipts are less than $25.5 million.61 RM96–1–038, and must include the
itself, by means of its internal review,
38. The regulations proposed here commenter’s name, the organization
that there is specific, objective support
impose requirements only on interstate they represent, if applicable, and their
for the burden estimates associated with
pipelines, the majority of which are not address in their comments.
the information requirements.
small businesses. Most companies 41. The Commission encourages
34. Interested persons may obtain regulated by the Commission do not fall
information on the reporting comments to be filed electronically via
within the RFA’s definition of a small the eFiling link on the Commission’s
requirements by contacting the entity. Approximately 165 entities are
following: Federal Energy Regulatory Web site at http://www.ferc.gov. The
potential respondents subject to data Commission accepts most standard
Commission, 888 First Street NE., collection FERC–545 reporting
Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: Ellen word processing formats. Documents
requirements and also are subject to created electronically using word
Brown, Office of the Executive Director, data collection FERC 549–C reporting
email: DataClearance@ferc.gov, phone: processing software should be filed in
requirements. Nearly all of these entities native applications or print-to-PDF
(202) 502–8663, fax: (202) 273–0873].
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
35. Comments concerning the format and not in a scanned format.
56 Regulations Implementing the National
collection of information(s) and the Commenters filing electronically do not
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Order No. 486,
associated burden estimate(s), should be 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs. need to make a paper filing.
sent to the contact listed above and to Regulations Preambles 1986–1990 ¶ 30,783 (1987). 42. Commenters that are not able to
the Office of Management and Budget,
57 18 CFR 380.4. file comments electronically must send
58 See 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii), 380.4(a)(5),
Office of Information and Regulatory 380.4(a)(27). 62 This number is derived by dividing the total
Affairs, Washington, DC 20503 59 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
cost figure by the number of respondents. $441,778/
[Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal 60 13 CFR 121.101. 165 = $2,677.
Energy Regulatory Commission, 61 13 CFR 121.201, subsection 486. 63 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM 24JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_44121/page/7.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules 43987
(i) Additional Standards (Version 3.0, c. Deletes Standards 1.3.52, 2.3.49, 3.3.2, • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
November 14, 2014); 3.3.20, 4.3.4, 4.3.39, 4.3.65, 5.3.27, 10.3.2; www.regulations.gov. Follow the
(ii) Nominations Related Standards Datasets 2.4.12 through 2.4.16; and Principles instructions for submitting comments.
(Version 3.0, November 14, 2014); 1.1.5, 1.1.7, 1.1.9, 1.1.17, 4.1.31.
(iii) Flowing Gas Related Standards
Version 2.1 made the following changes to Written Submissions
the Version 2.0 Standards:
(Version 3.0, November 14, 2014); a. Revises Standards 0.3.18, 0.3.20, 0.3.21, Submit written submissions in the
(iv) Invoicing Related Standards 1.3.27, 1.3.55, 1.3.73, 2.3.32, 4.3.23, 4.3.28, following ways:
(Version 3.0, November 14, 2014); 4.3.35, 4.3.52, 4.3.67, 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.3.26, • Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
(v) Quadrant Electronic Delivery 5.3.38, 5.3.70, 5.3.71, 6.5.2, 7.3.16, 7.3.27; paper submissions): Division of Dockets
Mechanism Related Standards (Version Datasets 0.4.1 through 0.4.3, 1.4.1 through Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
3.0, November 14, 2014); 1.4.7, 2.4.1 through 2.4.7, 2.4.9 through Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
(vi) Capacity Release Related 2.4.11, 2.4.13 through 2.4.18, 3.4.1 through 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 3.4.4, 5.4.14 through 5.4.17, 5.4.20 through Instructions: All submissions received
5.4.22, 5.4.24 through 5.4.26; and Definitions
2014); must include the Docket No. FDA–
10.2.8, 10.2.30.
(vii) Internet Electronic Transport b. Adds Standards 0.3.23 through 0.3.29, 2011–N–0146 for this rulemaking. All
Related Standards (Version 3.0, 1.3.58, 1.3.73, 1.3.81, 2.3.66, 4.3.103, 4.3.104; comments received may be posted
November 14, 2014); and Dataset 0.4.4. without change to http://
(viii) Minor Correction/Clarification, c. Deletes Standards 0.3.19, 1.3.47, 1.3.49, www.regulations.gov, including any
Request No. MC15009, approved April 1.3.50, 1.3.54, 1.3.57, 1.3.59 through 1.3.61, personal information provided. For
30, 2015; and 1.3.63, 2.3.33 through 2.3.35, 3.3.1, 4.3.39, additional information on submitting
(ix) Minor Correction/Clarification, 4.3.51, 4.3.56, 4.3.59, 4.3.73, 4.3.74, 4.3.76. comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
Request No. MC15012, approved May [FR Doc. 2015–17921 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am] of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
29, 2015. BILLING CODE 6717–01–P section of this document.
* * * * * Docket: For access to the docket to
■ 8. Section 284.13 is amended by read background documents or
revising paragraph (c)(2)(vi) to read as DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND comments received, go to http://
follows: HUMAN SERVICES www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number(s), found in brackets in
§ 284.13 Reporting requirements for Food and Drug Administration the heading of this document, into the
interstate pipelines.
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
* * * * * 21 CFR Part 1 and/or go to the Division of Dockets
(c) * * * Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0146]
(2) * * * 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
(vi) The receipt and delivery points RIN 0910–AG66
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
and the zones or segments covered by
User Fee Program To Provide for Charlotte A. Christin, Center for Food
the contract in which the capacity is
Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors/ Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and
held, including the location code for
Certification Bodies To Conduct Food Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
each point zone or segment along with
Safety Audits and To Issue Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 240–
a posting on the pipeline’s Web site that
Certifications 402–3708.
identifies active and inactive points, the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
date the point becomes active or AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,
inactive, the location of the point, and HHS. Table of Contents
an identification of the upstream or ACTION: Proposed rule.
downstream entity, if any, at that point; I. Background
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug A. Introduction
* * * * *
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or B. Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors
Note: The following appendix will not Proposed Rule
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations. we) is issuing this proposed rule to C. Regulatory Use of Certifications Under
amend the proposed rule, FSMA
Appendix ‘‘Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors/ D. Reimbursement (User Fee) Program
Certification Bodies to Conduct Food Under Section 808(c)(8) of the FD&C Act
List of Revisions in NAESB’s WGQ Version Safety Audits and to Issue II. Legal Authority
3.0 Business Practice Standards to Its Prior Certifications’’ (Accreditation of Third- III. Description of the Proposed Rule
Business Practice Standards A. Who would be subject to a user fee?
Party Auditors proposed rule) and to
Version 3.0 makes the following changes to propose to establish a reimbursement B. What user fees would be established?
the Version 2.1 Standards: (user fee) program to assess fees and C. How will FDA notify the public about
a. Revises Standards 0.3.28, 1.1.3, 1.3.1, the fee schedule?
1.3.2 through 1.3.5, 1.3.7 through 1.3.9,
require reimbursement for the work D. When must the user fee be submitted?
1.3.11, 1.3.13 through 1.3.15, 1.3.22, 1.3.27, performed to establish and administer E. Are user fees refundable?
1.3.33, 1.3.41, 1.3.42, 1.3.51, 1.3.80, 2.3.5, the system for the Accreditation of F. What are the consequences of not paying
2.3.9, 2.3.14, 2.3.15, 2.3.21, 2.3.26, 2.3.40, Third-Party Auditors under the FDA a user fee on time?
2.3.46, 2.3.47, 3.3.3, 3.3.7, 3.3.14, 3.3.15, Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). G. Possible Exemptions
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4.3.2, 4.3.3, 4.3.16, 4.3.23, 4.3.35, 4.3.45, DATES: Submit either electronic or IV. Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis
4.3.46, 4.3.54, 4.3.90, 5.3.2, 5.3.32, 5.3.44, written comments on the proposed rule A. Introduction
5.3.45, 5.3.48, 5.3.49, 5.3.53, 5.3.54, 5.3.56; by October 7, 2015. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Datasets 0.4.1, 0.4.2, 0.4.4, 1.4.1 through C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
1.4.7, 2.4.1 through 2.4.11, 2.4.17, 2.4.18, ADDRESSES: You may submit comments D. Need for This Regulation
3.4.1 through 3.4.4, 5.4.14 through 5.4.17, by any of the following methods. V. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
5.4.20 through 5.4.27; Principles 1.1.15, Electronic Submissions VI. Analysis of Environmental Impact
1.1.18, 2.1.5; and Definitions 1.2.2, 1.2.4, VII. Federalism
2.2.5. Submit electronic comments in the VIII. Comments
b. Adds Standards 0.2.5, 4.3.105, 5.3.73. following way: IX. References
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM 24JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_44121/page/9.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:24:36
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:24:36
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | Comments are due August 24, 2015. | |
| Contact | Stanley Wolf (technical issues), Office of Energy Policy and Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-6841, Email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 43979 | |
| CFR Citation | 18
CFR
157 18 CFR 260 18 CFR 284 | |
| CFR Associated | Incorporation by Reference; Natural Gas and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR