80_FR_44142 80 FR 44000 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Electronic Reporting Consistent With the Cross Media Electronic Reporting Rule

80 FR 44000 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Electronic Reporting Consistent With the Cross Media Electronic Reporting Rule

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 142 (July 24, 2015)

Page Range44000-44001
FR Document2015-18097

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of New Mexico. The revision pertains primarily to electronic reporting and would require electronic reporting of documents submitted for compliance with Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements. The revision also includes other changes which are non- substantive and primarily address updates to New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) document viewing locations.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 142 (Friday, July 24, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44000-44001]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18097]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0172; FRL-9931-08-Region 6]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
New Mexico; Electronic Reporting Consistent With the Cross Media 
Electronic Reporting Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the 
State of New Mexico. The revision pertains primarily

[[Page 44001]]

to electronic reporting and would require electronic reporting of 
documents submitted for compliance with Clean Air Act (CAA) 
requirements. The revision also includes other changes which are non-
substantive and primarily address updates to New Mexico Environment 
Department (NMED) document viewing locations.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before August 24, 
2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air 
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be 
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following 
the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final 
rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sherry Fuerst, 214-665-6454, 
fuerst.sherry@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct rule 
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this 
action no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives relevant 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do 
so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: July 10, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015-18097 Filed 7-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                      44000                      Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules

                                                      compliance, please submit a comment                      Reform, to minimize litigation,                       information that may lead to the
                                                      (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you                       eliminate ambiguity, and reduce                       discovery of a significant environmental
                                                      think it qualifies and how and to what                   burden.                                               impact from this proposed rule.
                                                      degree this rule would economically
                                                                                                               10. Protection of Children From                       List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147
                                                      affect it.
                                                                                                               Environmental Health Risks                              Continental shelf, Marine safety,
                                                         The Coast Guard will not retaliate
                                                      against small entities that question or                     We have analyzed this proposed rule                Navigation (water).
                                                      complain about this proposed rule or                     under Executive Order 13045,                            For the reasons discussed in the
                                                      any policy or action of the Coast Guard.                 Protection of Children from                           preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
                                                                                                               Environmental Health Risks and Safety                 amend 33 CFR part 147 as follows:
                                                      4. Collection of Information                             Risks. This rule is not an economically
                                                        This proposed rule would call for no                   significant rule and would not create an              PART 147—SAFETY ZONES
                                                      new collection of information under the                  environmental risk to health or risk to
                                                      Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44                      safety that might disproportionately                  ■ 1. The authority citation for part 147
                                                      U.S.C. 3501–3520.).                                      affect children.                                      continues to read as follows:
                                                      5. Federalism                                            11. Indian Tribal Governments                           Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333;
                                                                                                                                                                     and Department of Homeland Security
                                                         A rule has implications for federalism                   This proposed rule does not have                   Delegation No. 0170.1.
                                                      under Executive Order 13132,                             tribal implications under Executive
                                                                                                                                                                     ■   2. Add § 147.865 to read as follows:
                                                      Federalism, if it has a substantial direct               Order 13175, Consultation and
                                                      effect on the States, on the relationship                Coordination with Indian Tribal                       § 147.865    Titan SPAR Facility Safety Zone.
                                                      between the national government and                      Governments, because it would not have                  (a) Description. The Titan SPAR
                                                      the States, or on the distribution of                    a substantial direct effect on one or                 system is in the deepwater area of the
                                                      power and responsibilities among the                     more Indian tribes, on the relationship               Gulf of Mexico at Mississippi Canyon
                                                      various levels of government. We have                    between the Federal Government and                    941. The facility is located at 28°02′02″
                                                      analyzed this proposed rule under that                   Indian tribes, or on the distribution of              N. 89°06′04″ W. and the area within 500
                                                      Order and have determined that it does                   power and responsibilities between the                meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on
                                                      not have implications for federalism.                    Federal Government and Indian tribes.                 the facility structure’s outer edge is a
                                                      6. Protest Activities                                    12. Energy Effects                                    safety zone.
                                                                                                                                                                       (b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or
                                                        The Coast Guard respects the First                       We have analyzed this proposed rule
                                                                                                                                                                     remain in this safety zone except the
                                                      Amendment rights of protesters.                          under Executive Order 13211, Actions
                                                                                                                                                                     following:
                                                      Protesters are asked to contact the                      Concerning Regulations That
                                                                                                                                                                       (1) An attending vessel;
                                                      person listed in the FOR FURTHER                         Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
                                                                                                                                                                       (2) A vessel under 100 feet in length
                                                      INFORMATION CONTACT section to                           Distribution, or Use.
                                                                                                                                                                     overall not engaged in towing; or
                                                      coordinate protest activities so that your               13. Technical Standards                                 (3) A vessel authorized by the
                                                      message can be received without                                                                                Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
                                                      jeopardizing the safety or security of                     This proposed rule does not use
                                                                                                               technical standards. Therefore, we did                District.
                                                      people, places or vessels.
                                                                                                               not consider the use of voluntary                       Dated: June 7, 2015.
                                                      7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                          consensus standards.                                  David R. Callahan,
                                                         The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                      14. Environment                                       Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
                                                      of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires                                                                          Eighth Coast Guard District.
                                                      Federal agencies to assess the effects of                  We have analyzed this proposed rule                 [FR Doc. 2015–18202 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am]
                                                      their discretionary regulatory actions. In               under Department of Homeland                          BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
                                                      particular, the Act addresses actions                    Security Management Directive 023–01
                                                      that may result in the expenditure by a                  and Commandant Instruction
                                                      State, local, or tribal government, in the               M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
                                                                                                                                                                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                                      aggregate, or by the private sector of                   Guard in complying with the National
                                                                                                                                                                     AGENCY
                                                      $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or                 Environmental Policy Act of 1969
                                                      more in any one year. Though this                        (NEPA) 42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have                40 CFR Part 52
                                                      proposed rule would not result in such                   made a preliminary determination that
                                                                                                               this action is one of a category of actions           [EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0172; FRL–9931–08–
                                                      an expenditure, we do discuss the                                                                              Region 6]
                                                      effects of this rule elsewhere in this                   which do not individually or
                                                      preamble.                                                cumulatively have a significant effect on
                                                                                                                                                                     Approval and Promulgation of Air
                                                                                                               the human environment. This proposed
                                                      8. Taking of Private Property                                                                                  Quality Implementation Plans; New
                                                                                                               rule involves the establishment of a
                                                                                                                                                                     Mexico; Electronic Reporting
                                                        This proposed rule would not cause a                   safety zone around an OCS facility to
                                                                                                                                                                     Consistent With the Cross Media
                                                      taking of private property or otherwise                  protect life, property and the marine
                                                                                                                                                                     Electronic Reporting Rule
                                                      have taking implications under                           environment. This proposed rule is
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                      Executive Order 12630, Governmental                      categorical excluded from further                     AGENCY:  Environmental Protection
                                                      Actions and Interference with                            review, under figure 2–1, paragraph                   Agency (EPA).
                                                      Constitutionally Protected Property                      (34)(g), of the Commandant Instruction.               ACTION: Proposed rule.
                                                      Rights.                                                  A preliminary environmental analysis
                                                                                                               checklist supporting this determination               SUMMARY:  The Environmental Protection
                                                      9. Civil Justice Reform                                  and the Categorical Exclusion                         Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
                                                        This proposed rule meets applicable                    Determination are available in the                    State Implementation Plan (SIP)
                                                      standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of                docket where indicated under                          revision submitted by the State of New
                                                      Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice                     ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or                    Mexico. The revision pertains primarily


                                                 VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:51 Jul 23, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00032   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM   24JYP1


                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules                                              44001

                                                      to electronic reporting and would                        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                              provided, unless the comment includes
                                                      require electronic reporting of                          AGENCY                                                Confidential Business Information (CBI)
                                                      documents submitted for compliance                                                                             or other information the disclosure of
                                                      with Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.                   40 CFR Part 52                                        which is restricted by statute.
                                                      The revision also includes other                         [EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0257; FRL–9931–04–                  Information that you consider CBI or
                                                      changes which are non-substantive and                    Region 9]                                             otherwise protected should be clearly
                                                      primarily address updates to New                                                                               identified as such and should not be
                                                      Mexico Environment Department                            Approval of Air Plans; California;                    submitted through www.regulations.gov
                                                      (NMED) document viewing locations.                       Multiple Districts; Prevention of                     or email. www.regulations.gov is an
                                                                                                               Significant Deterioration                             ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and the
                                                      DATES: Written comments should be                                                                              EPA will not know your identity or
                                                      received on or before August 24, 2015.                   AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                     contact information unless you provide
                                                                                                               Agency (EPA).                                         it in the body of your comment. If you
                                                      ADDRESSES:   Comments may be mailed to
                                                                                                               ACTION: Proposed rule.                                send email directly to the EPA, your
                                                      Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning
                                                                                                                                                                     email address will be automatically
                                                      Section (6PD–L), Environmental                           SUMMARY:   The EPA is proposing                       captured and included as part of the
                                                      Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,                     approval of five permitting rules                     public comment. If the EPA cannot read
                                                      Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.                    submitted for inclusion in the California             your comment due to technical
                                                      Comments may also be submitted                           State Implementation Plan (SIP). The                  difficulties and cannot contact you for
                                                      electronically or through hand delivery/                 State of California (State) is required               clarification, the EPA may not be able to
                                                      courier by following the detailed                        under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)                  consider your comment.
                                                      instructions in the ADDRESSES section of                 to adopt and implement a SIP-approved
                                                      the direct final rule located in the rules               Prevention of Significant Deterioration                  Docket: The index to the docket for
                                                                                                               (PSD) permit program. This SIP revision               this proposed action is available
                                                      section of this Federal Register.
                                                                                                               proposes to incorporate PSD rules for                 electronically at www.regulations.gov,
                                                      FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                         five local California air districts into the          docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2015–
                                                      Sherry Fuerst, 214–665–6454,                             SIP to establish a PSD permit program                 0257, and in hard copy at EPA Region
                                                      fuerst.sherry@epa.gov.                                   for pre-construction review of certain                IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
                                                                                                               new and modified major stationary                     California. While all documents in the
                                                      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:        In the                                                                       docket are listed in the index, some
                                                      final rules section of this Federal                      sources in attainment and unclassifiable
                                                                                                               areas. The local air districts with PSD               information may be publicly available
                                                      Register, EPA is approving the State’s                                                                         only at the hard copy location (e.g.,
                                                      SIP submittal as a direct rule without                   rules that are the subject of this proposal
                                                                                                               are the Feather River Air Quality                     copyrighted material), and some may
                                                      prior proposal because the Agency                                                                              not be publicly available in either
                                                                                                               Management District (Feather River or
                                                      views this as noncontroversial submittal                                                                       location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
                                                                                                               FRAQMD), Great Basin Unified Air
                                                      and anticipates no adverse comments. A                   Pollution Control District (Great Basin               copy materials, please schedule an
                                                      detailed rationale for the approval is set               or GBUAPCD), Butte County Air Quality                 appointment during normal business
                                                      forth in the direct final rule. If no                    Management District (Butte or                         hours with the contact listed in the FOR
                                                      relevant adverse comments are received                   BCAQMD), Santa Barbara County Air                     FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
                                                      in response to this action no further                    Pollution Control District (Santa Barbara             below. Due to building security
                                                      activity is contemplated. If EPA receives                or SBAPCD), and San Luis Obispo                       procedures, appointments must be
                                                      relevant adverse comments, the direct                    County Air Pollution Control District                 scheduled at least 48 hours in advance.
                                                      final rule will be withdrawn and all                     (San Luis Obispo or SLOAPCD)—                         FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Lisa
                                                      public comments received will be                         collectively, the Districts. We are                   Beckham, Permits Office (AIR–3), U.S.
                                                      addressed in a subsequent final rule                     soliciting public comment on this                     Environmental Protection Agency,
                                                      based on this proposed rule. EPA will                    proposal and plan to follow with a final              Region IX, (415) 972–3811,
                                                      not institute a second comment period.                   action after consideration of comments                beckham.lisa@epa.gov.
                                                      Any parties interested in commenting                     received.
                                                      on this action should do so at this time.                                                                      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                               DATES: Any comments must be
                                                                                                               submitted no later than August 24,                    Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
                                                         For additional information, see the                                                                         and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
                                                      direct final rule which is located in the                2015.
                                                      rules section of this Federal Register.                  ADDRESSES:   Submit comments,                         Table of Contents
                                                                                                               identified by docket number EPA–R09–                  I. The State’s Submittal
                                                      List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
                                                                                                               OAR–2015–0257, by one of the                             A. What rules did the State submit?
                                                        Environmental protection, Air                          following methods:                                       B. Are there other versions of these rules?
                                                      pollution control, Incorporation by                        1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:                         C. What is the purpose of the submitted
                                                                                                               www.regulations.gov. Follow the online                      rules?
                                                      reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
                                                                                                               instructions.                                         II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
                                                      requirements.                                                                                                     A. How is the EPA evaluating these rules?
                                                                                                                 2. Email: R9airpermits@epa.gov.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                        Dated: July 10, 2015.                                    3. Mail or deliver: Lisa Beckham (Air–                 B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
                                                      Ron Curry,                                                                                                           criteria?
                                                                                                               3), U.S. Environmental Protection
                                                                                                                                                                        C. Significant impact levels and significant
                                                      Regional Administrator, Region 6.                        Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,                      monitoring concentrations for PM2.5.
                                                      [FR Doc. 2015–18097 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am]              San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.                            D. Greenhouse Gases
                                                      BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                                                                                 Instructions: All comments will be                     E. Transfer of existing permits issued by
                                                                                                               included in the public docket without                       the EPA
                                                                                                               change and may be made available                         F. Public comment and proposed action
                                                                                                               online at www.regulations.gov,                        III. Incorporation by Reference
                                                                                                               including any personal information                    IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews



                                                 VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:51 Jul 23, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00033   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM   24JYP1



Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:24:39
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:24:39
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule.
DatesWritten comments should be received on or before August 24, 2015.
ContactSherry Fuerst, 214-665-6454, [email protected]
FR Citation80 FR 44000 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR