80 FR 44884 - Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; North Atlantic Swordfish Fishery
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 144 (July 28, 2015)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 144 (July 28, 2015)
| Page Range | 44884-44887 | |
| FR Document | 2015-18431 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 44884-44887] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-18431] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 635 [Docket No. 120627194-3657-02] RIN 0648-XE005 Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; North Atlantic Swordfish Fishery AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Temporary rule; Swordfish General Commercial permit retention limit adjustment for Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and U.S. Caribbean regions. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: NMFS is adjusting the Swordfish (SWO) General Commercial permit retention limits for the Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and U.S. Caribbean regions for the remainder of 2015, unless otherwise noticed. The SWO General Commercial permit retention limit in each of these three regions is increased to six SWO per vessel per trip. The SWO General Commercial permit retention limit in the Florida SWO Management Area will remain unchanged at zero SWO per vessel per trip. This adjustment applies to SWO General Commercial permitted vessels and HMS Charter/Headboat permitted vessels when on a non-for-hire trip. This action is based upon consideration of the applicable inseason regional retention limit adjustment criteria. DATES: The adjusted SWO General Commercial permit retention limits in the Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and U.S. Caribbean regions are effective July 30, 2015 through December 31, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Pearson or Randy Blankinship, 727-824-5399. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations implemented under the authority of the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA; 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.) and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson- Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) governing the harvest of North Atlantic SWO by persons and vessels subject to U.S. jurisdiction are found at 50 CFR part 635. Section 635.27 subdivides the U.S. North Atlantic SWO quota recommended by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) [[Page 44885]] into two equal semi-annual directed fishery quotas, an annual incidental catch quota for fishermen targeting other species or taking SWO recreationally, and a reserve category, per the allocations established in the 2006 Consolidated Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan (2006 Consolidated HMS FMP) (71 FR 58058, October 2, 2006), as amended, and in accordance with implementing regulations. NMFS is required under ATCA and the Magnuson-Stevens Act to provide U.S. fishing vessels with a reasonable opportunity to harvest the ICCAT-recommended quota. The 2015 adjusted North Atlantic SWO quota is 3,359.4 mt dw (see FR 80 25609, May 5, 2015). From the adjusted quota, 50 mt dw was allocated to the reserve category for inseason adjustments and research, and 300 mt dw was allocated to the incidental category, which includes recreational landings and landings by incidental SWO permit holders, per Sec. 635.27(c)(1)(i). This resulted in an allocation of 3,009.4 mt dw for the directed fishery, which is split equally (1,504.7 mt dw) between two seasons in 2015 (January through June, and July through December). Adjustment of SWO General Commercial Permit Vessel Retention Limits The 2015 North Atlantic SWO fishing year, which is managed on a calendar-year basis and divided into two equal semi-annual quotas, began January 1, 2015. Landings attributable to the SWO General Commercial permit are counted against the applicable semi-annual directed fishery quota. Regional default retention limits for this permit have been established and are automatically effective from January 1 through December 31 each year, unless changed based on the inseason regional retention limit adjustment criteria at Sec. 635.24(b)(4)(iv). The default retention limits established for the SWO General Commercial permit are: (1) Northwest Atlantic region--three SWO per vessel per trip; (2) Gulf of Mexico region--three SWO per vessel per trip; (3) U.S. Caribbean region--2 SWO per vessel per trip; and, (4) Florida SWO Management Area--zero SWO per vessel per trip. The default retention limits apply to SWO General Commercial permitted vessels and to HMS Charter/Headboat permitted vessels when fishing on non-for-hire trips. As a condition of these permits, vessels may not possess, retain, or land any more SWO than is specified for the region in which the vessel is located. The retention limits were not adjusted in 2014. NMFS has received requests to increase the retention limits in the Northwest Atlantic region and in the Florida SWO Management Area. Under Sec. 635.24(b)(4)(iii), NMFS may increase or decrease the SWO General Commercial permit vessel retention limit in any region within a range from zero to a maximum of six SWO per vessel per trip. Any adjustments to retention limits must be based upon consideration of the relevant criteria provided in Sec. 635.24(b)(4)(iv), which include: The usefulness of information obtained from biological sampling and monitoring of the North Atlantic SWO stock; the estimated ability of vessels participating in the fishery to land the amount of SWO quota available before the end of the fishing year; the estimated amounts by which quotas for other categories of the fishery might be exceeded; effects of the adjustment on accomplishing the objectives of the fishery management plan and its amendments; variations in seasonal distribution, abundance, or migration patterns of SWO; effects of catch rates in one region precluding vessels in another region from having a reasonable opportunity to harvest a portion of the overall SWO quota; and, review of dealer reports, landing trends, and the availability of SWO on the fishing grounds. NMFS has considered these criteria, as discussed below, and their applicability to the SWO General Commercial permit retention limit in all regions for the remainder of 2015. Last year, with application of the default SWO General Commercial permit retention limits, total annual directed SWO fishery landings were approximately 1,303 mt dw (39 percent of the 3,303-mt dw total annual adjusted directed fishery quota). This year, through June 30, 2015, directed SWO landings are 481.6 mt dw (36.5 percent of the 1,505 mt dw Jan. to June semi-annual adjusted directed subquota; or 16 percent of the 3,010 mt dw total annual adjusted directed quota). Given that SWO directed landings fell well below the available 2014 quota, and that 2015 landings continue to be below the available 2015 directed SWO quota, and considering the regulatory criteria, NMFS has determined that the SWO General Commercial permit vessel retention limit in the Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and U.S. Caribbean regions applicable to persons issued a SWO General Commercial permit or HMS Charter/Headboat permit (when on a non-for-hire trip) should be increased from the default levels discussed above. A principal consideration is the objective of providing opportunities to harvest the full North Atlantic directed SWO quota without exceeding it based upon the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP goal: ``Consistent with other objectives of this FMP, to manage Atlantic HMS fisheries for continuing optimum yield so as to provide the greatest overall benefit to the Nation, particularly with respect to food production, providing recreational opportunities, preserving traditional fisheries, and taking into account the protection of marine ecosystems.'' At the same time, it is also important for NMFS to continue to provide protection to important SWO juvenile areas and migratory corridors. After considering all of the relevant criteria, NMFS has determined that this year, increases from the default limits are warranted. With respect to the regulatory criteria, NMFS has examined dealer reports and landing trends, and determined that the information obtained from biological sampling and monitoring of the North Atlantic SWO stock is useful. Recently implemented electronic dealer reporting provides accurate and timely monitoring of landings. This information indicates that sufficient directed SWO quota is available that would warrant an increase in the SWO General Commercial permit retention limit. Regarding the regulatory criterion that NMFS consider ``the estimated ability of vessels participating in the fishery to land the amount of SWO quota available before the end of the fishing year,'' the directed SWO quota has not been harvested for several years and, based upon current landing trends, is not likely to be harvested or exceeded in 2015. Based upon recent landings rates from dealer reports, an increase in the vessel retention limit for SWO General Commercial permit holders is not likely to cause quotas for other categories of the fishery to be exceeded. Similarly, regarding the criterion that NMFS consider the estimated amounts by which quotas for other categories of the fishery might be exceeded, NMFS expects there to be sufficient SWO quota for the remainder of the year, and thus increased catch rates in one region are not expected to preclude vessels in another region from having a reasonable opportunity to harvest a portion of the overall SWO quota. Landings by vessels issued this permit (and Charter/Headboat permitted vessels on a non-for-hire trip) are counted against the adjusted directed SWO quota. As indicated above, this quota has not been exceeded for several years and, based upon current landing trends, is not likely to be exceeded in [[Page 44886]] 2015. Similarly, NMFS expects that there will be sufficient SWO quota for the remainder of the year, thus increased catch rates in one region are not expected to preclude vessels in another region from having a reasonable opportunity to harvest a portion of the overall SWO quota. With regard to SWO abundance, the 2014 report by ICCAT's Standing Committee on Research and Statistics indicated that the North Atlantic SWO stock is not overfished (B2011 /Bmsy = 1.14), and overfishing is not occurring (F2011 /Fmsy = 0.82). Increasing the retention limit for this U.S. handgear fishery is not expected to affect the SWO stock status determination because any additional landings would be in compliance with the ICCAT recommended U.S. North Atlantic SWO quota allocation. Mature SWO are anticipated to migrate to the fishing grounds off the northeast U.S. coast during the summer and fall months. Based upon landings over the last several years, it is highly unlikely that the June through December directed SWO subquota will be filled with the current default retention limits of three SWO per vessel per trip (Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico), and two SWO per vessel per trip (U.S. Caribbean). For the entire 2014 fishing year, 39 percent of the total adjusted directed SWO quota was filled. Increasing the SWO General Commercial permit retention limit to six fish per vessel per trip will increase the likelihood that directed SWO landings will approach, but not exceed, the annual SWO quota, as well as increase the opportunity for catching SWO during the June through December directed subquota period. Increasing opportunity within this subquota period is also important because of the migratory nature and seasonal distribution of SWO, one of the regulatory criteria to be considered when changing the retention limit inseason (variations in seasonal distribution, abundance, or migration patterns of SWO). In a particular geographic region, or waters accessible from a particular port, the amount of fishing opportunity for SWO may be constrained by the short amount of time the SWO are present as they migrate. Dealer reports for Swordfish General Commercial permitted vessels indicate swordfish are available from June through December in both the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico regions and are likely to be available in the U.S. Caribbean region during December and January. Based upon these considerations, NMFS has determined that a six- fish per vessel per trip SWO General Commercial permit retention limit is warranted in the Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and U.S. Caribbean regions through December 31, 2015, for SWO General Commercial permitted vessels and HMS Charter/Headboat permitted vessels when on a non-for-hire trip. It would provide a reasonable opportunity to harvest the U.S. quota of SWO without exceeding it, while maintaining an equitable distribution of fishing opportunities; help achieve optimum yield in the SWO fishery; allow for the collection of data for stock monitoring purposes; and be consistent with the objectives of the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP, as amended. Therefore, NMFS increases the SWO General Commercial permit retention limit from the default limit to six SWO per vessel per trip in these three regions, effective from July 30, 2015 through December 31, 2015. The regional SWO retention limits will automatically revert back to the default levels on January 1, 2016. As indicated above, NMFS has also received requests since publication of the final rule implementing Amendment 8 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (which established the SWO General Commercial permit) to increase the retention limit of SWO in the Florida SWO Management Area from the default of zero. NMFS has determined that the retention limit will remain at zero SWO per vessel per trip in the Florida SWO Management Area in 2015. As described in Amendment 8 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP, the area off the southeastern coast of Florida, particularly the Florida Straits, contains oceanographic features that make the area biologically unique. It provides important juvenile SWO habitat, and is essentially a narrow migratory corridor containing high concentrations of SWO located in close proximity to high concentrations of people who may fish for them. Public comment on Amendment 8, including from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, indicated concern about the resultant high potential for the improper rapid growth of a commercial fishery, increased catches of undersized SWO, the potential for larger numbers of fishermen in the area, and the potential for crowding of fishermen, which could lead to gear and user conflicts. These concerns remain valid. NMFS will continue to collect information to evaluate the appropriateness of the retention limit in the Florida SWO Management Area and other regional retention limits. These adjustments are consistent with the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP as amended, ATCA, and the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and are not expected to negatively impact stock health. Monitoring and Reporting NMFS will continue to monitor the SWO fishery closely through mandatory landings and catch reports. Dealers are required to submit landing reports and negative reports (if no SWO were purchased) on a weekly basis. Depending on the level of fishing effort and catch rates of SWO, NMFS may determine that additional retention limit adjustments or closures are necessary to ensure that available quota is not exceeded or to enhance fishing opportunities. Subsequent actions, if any, will be published in the Federal Register. In addition, fishermen may access http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/species/swordfish/landings/index.html for updates on quota monitoring. Classification The Assistant Administrator for NMFS (AA) finds that it is impracticable and contrary to the public interest to provide prior notice of, and an opportunity for public comment on, this action for the following reasons: The regulations implementing the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP, as amended, provide for inseason retention limit adjustments to respond to changes in SWO landings, the availability of SWO on the fishing grounds, the migratory nature of this species, and regional variations in the fishery. Based on available SWO quota, stock abundance, fishery performance in recent years, and the availability of SWO on the fishing grounds, among other considerations, adjustment to the SWO General Commercial permit retention limits from the default levels is warranted. Analysis of available data shows that adjustment to the SWO daily retention limit from the default level would result in minimal risks of exceeding the ICCAT-allocated quota. NMFS provides notification of retention limit adjustments by publishing the notice in the Federal Register, emailing individuals who have subscribed to the Atlantic HMS News electronic newsletter, and updating the information posted on the ``Atlantic HMS Breaking News'' Web site at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/news/breaking_news.html. Delays in temporarily increasing these retention limits would adversely affect those SWO General Commercial permit holders and HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders that would otherwise have an opportunity to harvest more than the default retention limits of three [[Page 44887]] SWO per vessel per trip in the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico regions, and two SWO per vessel per trip in the U.S. Caribbean region. Further, any delay could exacerbate the problem of low SWO landings and subsequent quota rollovers. Limited opportunities to harvest the directed SWO quota may have negative social and economic impacts for U.S. fishermen. Adjustment of the retention limits needs to be effective as soon as possible to allow the impacted sectors to benefit from the adjustment during the relevant time period, which would have largely passed by for some fishermen if the action is delayed for notice, and to not preclude fishing opportunities for fishermen who have access to the fishery only during this time period. Therefore, the AA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to waive prior notice and the opportunity for public comment. For all of the above reasons, there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness. This action is being taken under Sec. 635.24(b)(4) and is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. and 1801 et seq. Dated: July 23, 2015. Alan D. Risenhoover, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2015-18431 Filed 7-27-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
![44884 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 144 / Tuesday, July 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The vessel has a valid permit the western and central Pacific as a DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
issued under 50 CFR 660.707 or result of reaching the applicable bigeye
665.801. tuna catch limit. The limit is codified in National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Bigeye tuna caught by longline gear Federal regulations and is based on Administration
during the closure may also be retained agreed limits established by the Western
on board, transshipped, and/or landed if and Central Pacific Fisheries 50 CFR Part 635
they are caught by a vessel that is Commission. NMFS forecasts that the [Docket No. 120627194–3657–02]
included in a specified fishing fishery will reach the 2015 limit by
agreement under 50 CFR 665.819(d), in August 5, 2015. Although this is much RIN 0648–XE005
accordance with 50 CFR 300.224(f)(iv). earlier than in previous years, longline
During the closure, a U.S. vessel is Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
also prohibited from transshipping fishermen have been subject to longline North Atlantic Swordfish Fishery
bigeye tuna caught in the Convention bigeye tuna limits in the western and
central Pacific since 2009. They have AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Area by longline gear to any vessel other Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
than a U.S. fishing vessel with a valid received ongoing, updated information
about the 2015 catch and progress of the Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
permit issued under 50 CFR 660.707 or Commerce.
665.801. fishery in reaching the Convention Area
The catch limit and this closure do limit via the NMFS Web site, social ACTION: Temporary rule; Swordfish
not apply to bigeye tuna caught by media, and other means. This General Commercial permit retention
longline gear outside the Convention constitutes adequate advance notice of limit adjustment for Northwest Atlantic,
Area, such as in the eastern Pacific this fishery closure. Additionally, the Gulf of Mexico, and U.S. Caribbean
Ocean. To ensure compliance with the publication timing of this rule provides regions.
restrictions related to bigeye tuna caught longline fishermen with seven days’ SUMMARY: NMFS is adjusting the
by longline gear in the Convention Area, advance notice of the closure date, and Swordfish (SWO) General Commercial
however, the following requirements allows two weeks to return to port and permit retention limits for the
apply during the closure period: land their catch of bigeye tuna. Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and
(1) Longline fishing both inside and
For the reasons stated above, there is U.S. Caribbean regions for the
outside the Convention Area is not
also good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) remainder of 2015, unless otherwise
allowed during the same fishing trip. An
to waive the 30-day delay in noticed. The SWO General Commercial
exception would be a fishing trip that is
effectiveness for this temporary rule. permit retention limit in each of these
in progress on August 5, 2015. In that
NMFS must close the fishery as soon as three regions is increased to six SWO
case, the catch of bigeye tuna must be
possible to ensure that fishery does not per vessel per trip. The SWO General
landed by August 19, 2015; and
(2) If a longline vessel fishes outside exceed the catch limit. According to Commercial permit retention limit in
the Convention Area and the vessel then NMFS stock-status-determination the Florida SWO Management Area will
enters the Convention Area during the criteria, bigeye tuna in the Pacific Ocean remain unchanged at zero SWO per
same fishing trip, the fishing gear must are currently experiencing overfishing. vessel per trip. This adjustment applies
be stowed and not readily available for to SWO General Commercial permitted
NMFS implemented the catch limit to
fishing in the Convention Area. vessels and HMS Charter/Headboat
reduce the effects of fishing on bigeye
Specifically, hooks, branch lines, and permitted vessels when on a non-for-
tuna and restore the stock to levels hire trip. This action is based upon
floats must be stowed and the mainline capable of producing maximum
hauler must be covered. consideration of the applicable inseason
sustainable yield on a continuing basis. regional retention limit adjustment
The above two additional prohibitions Failure to close the fishery immediately
do not apply to the following vessels: criteria.
would result in additional fishing
(1) Vessels on declared shallow- DATES: The adjusted SWO General
pressure on this stock, in violation of
setting trips pursuant to 50 CFR Commercial permit retention limits in
665.803(a); and Federal law and international
the Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico,
(2) Vessels operating in the longline obligations.
and U.S. Caribbean regions are effective
fisheries of the territories. This includes This action is required by 50 CFR July 30, 2015 through December 31,
vessels included in a specified fishing 300.224 and is exempt from review 2015.
agreement under 50 CFR 665.819(d), in under Executive Order 12866.
accordance with 50 CFR 300.224(f)(iv). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 6901 et seq. Pearson or Randy Blankinship, 727–
This group also includes vessels with
valid American Samoa longline permits Dated: July 23, 2015. 824–5399.
and vessels landing bigeye tuna in one Alan D. Risenhoover, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of the territories, as long as the bigeye Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Regulations implemented under the
tuna were not caught in the EEZ around National Marine Fisheries Service. authority of the Atlantic Tunas
Hawaii, the fishing was compliant with [FR Doc. 2015–18433 Filed 7–27–15; 8:45 am]
Convention Act (ATCA; 16 U.S.C. 971 et
all applicable laws, and the vessel has seq.) and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
a valid permit issued under 50 CFR Conservation and Management Act
660.707 or 665.801. (Magnuson-Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C. 1801
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
et seq.) governing the harvest of North
Classification Atlantic SWO by persons and vessels
There is good cause under 5 U.S.C. subject to U.S. jurisdiction are found at
553(b)(B) to waive prior notice and the 50 CFR part 635. Section 635.27
opportunity for public comment on this subdivides the U.S. North Atlantic SWO
action, because it would be contrary to quota recommended by the
the public interest. This rule closes the International Commission for the
U.S. longline fishery for bigeye tuna in Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:34 Jul 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM 28JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_45028/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 144 / Tuesday, July 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 44887
SWO per vessel per trip in the the U.S. EEZ south of Point Conception, Modified Daily Bag Limit Regulations
Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Santa Barbara County, under the This final rule reduces the existing
regions, and two SWO per vessel per Magnuson-Stevens Fishery bag limit of 10 PBF per day to 2 PBF per
trip in the U.S. Caribbean region. Conservation and Management Act day and the maximum multiday
Further, any delay could exacerbate the (MSA). This action is intended to possession limit (i.e., for trips of 3 days
problem of low SWO landings and conserve PBF, and is based on a or more) from 30 PBF to 6 PBF. For
subsequent quota rollovers. Limited recommendation of the Pacific Fishery
fishing trips of less than 3 days, the
opportunities to harvest the directed Management Council (Council).
daily bag limit is multiplied by the
SWO quota may have negative social DATES: The final rule is effective July 30, number of days fishing to determine the
and economic impacts for U.S. 2015. multiday possession limit (e.g., the
fishermen. Adjustment of the retention ADDRESSES: Copies of the Regulatory possession limit for a 1-day trip would
limits needs to be effective as soon as Impact Review (RIR), Environmental be two fish and for a 2-day trip, four
possible to allow the impacted sectors to Assessment, and other supporting fish). The bag limits of this section
benefit from the adjustment during the documents are available via the Federal apply on the basis of each 24-hour
relevant time period, which would have eRulemaking Portal: http:// period at sea, regardless of the number
largely passed by for some fishermen if www.regulations.gov, identified by of trips per day. The final rule does not
the action is delayed for notice, and to ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2015–0029’’, or contact authorize any person to take and retain
not preclude fishing opportunities for the Regional Administrator, William W. more than one daily bag limit of fish
fishermen who have access to the Stelle, Jr., NMFS West Coast Region, during 1 calendar day. The daily bag
fishery only during this time period. 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg 1, and multiday possession limits apply to
Therefore, the AA finds good cause Seattle, WA 98115–0070, or the U.S. EEZ off the coast of California
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to waive prior RegionalAdministrator.WCRHMS@ and might be more or less conservative
notice and the opportunity for public noaa.gov. than Mexico’s limits. The U.S.
comment. For all of the above reasons, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: recreational limits would not apply to
there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. Craig Heberer, NMFS, 760–431–9440, U.S. anglers while in Mexico’s waters,
553(d) to waive the 30-day delay in ext. 303, or Craig.Heberer@noaa.gov. but to facilitate enforcement and
effectiveness. monitoring, the limits will apply to U.S.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This action is being taken under
vessels in the U.S. EEZ or landing to
§ 635.24(b)(4) and is exempt from Background U.S. ports, regardless of where the fish
review under Executive Order 12866. On April 21, 2015, NMFS published were harvested.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. and 1801 a proposed rule in the Federal Register
et seq. (80 FR 22156) that would modify and New At-Sea Filleting Requirements
Dated: July 23, 2015. add regulations at 50 CFR 660.721, to The regulations establish new
Alan D. Risenhoover, reduce the daily bag limits for sport- requirements for filleting tuna at-sea
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, caught PBF harvested in the EEZ off the (i.e., each fish must be cut into six
National Marine Fisheries Service. coast of California and to promulgate pieces placed in an individual bag so
[FR Doc. 2015–18431 Filed 7–27–15; 8:45 am] new at-sea fillet regulations applicable that certain diagnostic characteristics
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
south of Point Conception, Santa are left intact), which will assist law
Barbara County. The public comment enforcement personnel in accurately
period on the proposed rule was open identifying the different tuna species.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE until May 6, 2015, and NMFS received These requirements apply to tuna
976 comments, which are summarized species caught south of the line running
National Oceanic and Atmospheric and discussed below. This final rule is due west true from Point Conception,
Administration intended to reduce fishing mortality and Santa Barbara County (34°27′ N. lat.). As
aid in rebuilding the PBF stock, which defined in 50 CFR 660.702, tuna refers
50 CFR Part 660 is overfished and subject to overfishing to the following species: Yellowfin,
[Docket No. 150305219–5619–02]
(78 FR 41033, July 9, 2013), and to Thunnus albacares; bluefin, T.
satisfy the United States’ obligation to orientalis; bigeye, T. obesus; albacore, T.
RIN 0648–BE78 reduce catches of PBF by sportfishing alalunga; and skipjack tuna,
vessels in accordance with conservation Katsuwonus pelamis.
Fisheries Off West Coast States; measures adopted by the Inter-American
Highly Migratory Species Fisheries; Public Comments and Responses
Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC).
Recreational Fishing Restrictions for This rule is implemented under the NMFS received 976 written public
Pacific Bluefin Tuna authority of the MSA as a conservation comments pertaining to the proposed
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries measure recommended by the Council action.
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and during the 2015–2016 biennial NMFS categorized comments by
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), management cycle, as established in the whether they supported a reduced bag
Commerce. Fishery Management Plan for U.S. West limit and/or establishment of new fillet
ACTION: Final rule. Coast Fisheries for Highly Migratory requirements. Summaries of the
Species (HMS FMP) framework comments received and NMFS’
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY: The National Marine provisions for changes to routine responses appear below. Some
Fisheries Service (NMFS) is issuing management measures. comments were beyond the scope of this
regulations to modify the existing The proposed rule contains additional rulemaking and are not addressed here.
Pacific bluefin tuna (PBF) Thunnus background information, including the Nonetheless, those comments are
orientalis recreational daily bag limit in basis for the new regulations. valuable; and NMFS will consider them
the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off Additional information on changes for future management planning.
California, and to establish filleting-at- since the proposed rule is included Comment 1: Reducing the daily bag
sea requirements for any tuna species in below. limit from 10 PBF per day to 2 PBF per
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:34 Jul 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM 28JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_45028/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:28:22
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:28:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Temporary rule; Swordfish General Commercial permit retention limit adjustment for Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and U.S. Caribbean regions. | |
| Dates | The adjusted SWO General Commercial permit retention limits in the Northwest Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and U.S. Caribbean regions are effective July 30, 2015 through December 31, 2015. | |
| Contact | Rick Pearson or Randy Blankinship, 727-824-5399. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 44884 | |
| RIN Number | 0648-XE00 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR