80 FR 45256 - Self-Regulatory Organizations: Miami International Securities Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 612 Regarding the Reset on Quote Functionality Included in the MIAX Aggregate Risk Manager
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 145 (July 29, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 145 (July 29, 2015)
| Page Range | 45256-45259 | |
| FR Document | 2015-18537 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 45256-45259] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-18537] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-75509; File No. SR-MIAX-2015-47] Self-Regulatory Organizations: Miami International Securities Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 612 Regarding the Reset on Quote Functionality Included in the MIAX Aggregate Risk Manager July 23, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on July 13, 2015, Miami International Securities Exchange LLC (``MIAX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend Exchange Rule 612 concerning the Reset on Quote functionality included in the MIAX Aggregate Risk Manager. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://www.miaxoptions.com/filter/wotitle/rule_filing, at MIAX's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. [[Page 45257]] A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 612, Aggregate Risk Manager (``ARM'') to make optional and more specifically define the current ARM ``Reset on Quote'' functionality, as described below. The MIAX System \3\ maintains a counting program (``counting program'') for Market Makers \4\ in their assigned option classes. Using the counting program, ARM protects Market Makers by limiting the number of contracts they execute in an option class on the Exchange within a specified time period that has been established by the Market Maker (a ``specified time period''). MIAX Market Makers establish a percentage of their quotations (the ``Allowable Engagement Percentage'') and the specified time period for each option class in which they are appointed.\5\ When an execution against a Market Maker's Standard quote \6\ or Day eQuote (as defined below) occurs, the System looks back over the specified time period to determine whether the execution is of sufficient size to trigger the Aggregate Risk Manager. The System activates the Aggregate Risk Manager when it has determined that a Market Maker has traded a number of contracts equal to or above their Allowable Engagement Percentage during the specified time period. The Aggregate Risk Manager then automatically cancels and removes the Market Maker's Standard quotes from the Exchange's disseminated quotation in all series of that particular option class until the Market Maker sends a notification to the System of the intent to reengage quoting and submits a new revised quotation in the affected class. Any eQuotes \7\ other than Day eQuotes \8\ present in the market are not cancelled by the Aggregate Risk Manager. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The term ``System'' means the automated trading system used by the Exchange for the trading of securities. See Exchange Rule 100. \4\ The term ``Market Maker'' refers to a ``Lead Market Maker,'' ``Primary Lead Market Maker'' and ``Registered Market Maker'' collectively. A Lead Market Maker is a Member registered with the Exchange for the purpose of making markets in securities traded on the Exchange and that is vested with the rights and responsibilities specified in Chapter VI of these Rules with respect to Lead Market Makers. A Primary Lead Market Maker is a Lead Market Maker appointed by the Exchange to act as the Primary Lead Market Maker for the purpose of making markets in securities traded on the Exchange. A Registered Market Maker is a Member registered with the Exchange for the purpose of making markets in securities traded on the Exchange, who is not a Lead Market Maker. See Exchange Rule 100. \5\ The Exchange's Board or designated committee appoints one Primary Lead Market Maker and other Market Makers to each options class traded on the Exchange. For a complete description of the Exchange's appointment process, see Exchange Rule 602. \6\ A Standard quote is a quote submitted by a Market Maker that cancels and replaces the Market Maker's previous Standard quote, if any. See Exchange Rule 517(a)(1). \7\ An eQuote is a quote with a specific time in force that does not automatically cancel and replace a previous Standard quote or eQuote. An eQuote can be cancelled by the Market Maker at any time, or can be replaced by another eQuote that contains specific instructions to cancel an existing eQuote. See Exchange Rule 517(a)(2). \8\ A Day eQuote is a quote submitted by a Market Maker that does not automatically cancel or replace the Market Maker's previous Standard quote or eQuote. Day eQuotes will expire at the close of trading each trading day. See Exchange Rule 517(a)(2)(i). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Currently, Exchange Rule 612(b)(1) states that, when a Market Maker revises his/her quotation on the buy side or sell side of an individual option, that side of the individual option will not be included in the Allowable Engagement Percentage and Net Offset calculations until it trades again. Proposed Rule 612(b)(1)(i) would clarify the existing rule to more precisely define this functionality. Proposed sub-paragraph (b)(1)(i) would clarify that when a Market Maker revises his/her quotation on the buy side or sell side of an individual option, contracts executed on that side will not be included in the Allowable Engagement Percentage and Net Offset calculations. For ease of reference, the Exchange proposes to establish the name ``Reset on Quote'' to describe this functionality in the new sub-paragraph. The Exchange believes that this change more precisely and accurately describes the Reset on Quote functionality and should better serve to inform Members and investors of what happens to the counting program when a Standard quote replaces another Standard quote.\9\ The proposed rule will specifically state that, in such a situation, the counting program is reset to zero (i.e., the counting system will be reset and begin anew) on that side upon receipt of the revised quotation for the affected individual option until it trades again. The Exchange believes this proposed amendment more precisely describes the current functionality. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ eQuotes, including Day eQuotes, do not cancel or replace existing eQuotes. See supra notes 7 and 8. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additionally, the proposed rule would give Market Makers the ability to opt out of the Reset on Quote functionality, and to opt back in at any time following the Market Maker's determination to opt out. Under the proposed rule, a Market Maker may determine to disengage or re-engage the Reset on Quote functionality for an option class.\10\ A Market Maker may disengage Reset on Quote by notifying the Exchange of its determination to disengage in a manner required by the Exchange and communicated to Members by Regulatory Circular. If a Market Maker determines to disengage the Reset on Quote functionality, the counting program will continue to count the number of contracts executed during the specified time period despite the submission by the Market Maker of a new Standard quote on that side of the market. If the Reset on Quote functionality is disengaged, the System will not reset the counting program to zero upon receipt of a revised quotation and instead will continue to add the number of contracts executed against the new quote to the number of contracts executed against any previous quotes on that side of the individual option during the specified time period. Absent notification to the Exchange to disengage Reset on Quote, the ARM counting system will, by default, continue to function as it does currently. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ The terms ``class of options'' or ``option class'' mean all option contracts covering the same underlying security. See Exchange Rule 100. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Once a Market Maker has determined to disengage Reset on Quote, it will not be re-engaged until the Market Maker determines to do so by notifying the Exchange of such a determination in a manner required by the Exchange and communicated to Members by Regulatory Circular. This non-automated notification requires the Exchange to re-engage the Reset on Quote functionality, as opposed to the method of re-engaging the standard ARM protections, where the Market Maker re-engages the ARM by sending a notification to the System of the intent to re-engage quoting and submits a new revised quotation in the affected class. The purpose of the non-automated method of re-engaging Reset on Quote is to give Market Makers the ability to reconsider and re-engage Reset on Quote during times of peak or unusual market activity, rather than an automated re-engagement. The Exchange believes that this non-automated contact will strengthen the efficiency of Reset on Quote by providing Market Makers with the ability to thoroughly assess current market conditions in setting risk management levels and controls. The System will consider disengagement of Reset on Quote to be a persistent state; disengagement of the Reset on Quote functionality will remain in place indefinitely (i.e., for an [[Page 45258]] entire trading session and across multiple trading sessions) until the Market Maker notifies the Exchange to re-engage it. A Market Maker may determine to disengage and re-engage Reset on Quote multiple times intra-day. The purpose of the proposed rule change is to enable individual Market Makers to tailor their risk management by disengaging or re- engaging the ARM Reset on Quote functionality for an individual option class or for multiple classes as market conditions warrant, based on their own risk tolerance and quoting behavior. The proposed rule change would provide Market Makers with flexibility to choose to have ARM count contracts executed during the specified time period that result from all executions on that side of the market, regardless of the number, price and/or size of the quotes against which executions occur during the counting period. This flexibility means that Market Makers may still elect to have the Reset on Quote functionality engaged, and thus only count contracts executed against their most recently submitted quote for purposes of calculating the Allowable Engagement Percentage. This will provide greater customization of risk controls based on each individual Market Maker's risk thresholds. The Exchange will announce the implementation date of the proposed rule change by Regulatory Circular to be published no later than 60 days following the operative date of the proposed rule. The implementation date will be no later than 60 days following the issuance of the Regulatory Circular. 2. Statutory Basis MIAX believes that its proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \11\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \12\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in, securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that Members will benefit from the proposed rule change. Market Makers, who are obligated to submit continuous two- sided quotations in a certain number of series in their appointed option classes for a certain percentage of each trading session,\13\ are vulnerable to the risk from unusual market conditions, volatility in specific option classes, and other market events that may cause them to receive multiple, extremely rapid automatic executions before they can adjust their quotations and overall risk exposure in the market. The Reset on Quote functionality is a valuable tool in assisting Market Makers in risk management; the ability of a Market Maker to determine if and when it is engaged or disengaged enables them to further tailor their risk management based on their expectation of market behavior and volatility or on actual real-time market conditions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ For a complete description of MIAX Market Maker quoting obligations, see Exchange Rule 604. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Without adequate risk management tools in place on the Exchange, the incentive for Exchange Market Makers to quote aggressively respecting both price and size could be diminished, and could result in a concomitant reduction in the depth and liquidity they provide to the market. Such a result may undermine the quality of the markets that would otherwise be available to customers and other market participants. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to help Market Makers better manage their risk exposure by giving them the ability to opt out of the Reset on Quote functionality. This should encourage Market Makers to provide additional depth and liquidity to the Exchange's markets, thereby removing impediments to and perfecting the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protecting investors and the public interest. In addition, the proposed rule change promotes just and equitable principles of trade by providing Exchange Market Makers with the ability to refine and tailor their participation in risk management mechanisms on the Exchange to give them confidence that protections are in place to reduce the risks associated with their Market Making obligations. Finally, the proposed rule change is designed to protect investors and the public interest by helping Market Makers prevent executions resulting from activity that exceeds their risk tolerance level under these rules as established by the Exchange. The amendments to the existing Reset on Quote functionality in the proposed rule are intended to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market by adding precision and ease of reference to the Exchange's rules, thus promoting transparency and clarity for Market Makers seeking to determine their risk management settings. The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change will not relieve Exchange Market Makers of their continuous quoting obligations under Exchange Rule 604 and under Reg NMS Rule 602.\14\ All of a Market Maker's quotes in each option class will be considered firm until such time as the Allowable Engagement Percentage threshold has been equaled or crossed and the Market Maker's quotes are removed by the Aggregate Risk Manager in all series of that option class.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ 17 CFR 242.602. \15\ See Exchange Rule 612(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With regard to the impact of this proposal on system capacity, the Exchange notes that it has analyzed its capacity and represents that it and the Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') have the necessary systems capacity to handle any potential additional traffic associated with the proposed rule change. The Exchange believes that its members will not have a capacity issue as a result of this proposal. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. On the contrary, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will foster competition by providing Exchange Market Makers with the ability to enhance and specifically customize their use of the Exchange's risk management tools to use in submitting quotations with the best possible price and size in order to compete for executions and order flow. The Exchange further believes the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on intra-market competition because its use is voluntary and is available to all Exchange Market Makers and Market Maker organizations. As to inter-market competition, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change should promote competition because it is designed to protect Exchange Market Makers from unusual market conditions or events that may cause them to receive multiple, automatic executions before they can adjust their quotation exposure in the market. For all the reasons stated, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any [[Page 45259]] burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, and believes the proposed change will in fact enhance competition.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ The Commission notes that, in the Form 19b-4, the Exchange states that the proposed rule change ``is based in part on the rules of another options exchange,'' Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. Rule 8.18, ``which gives Market Makers the ability to specify a maximum cumulative percentage, defined as the sum of the percentages of the original quoted size of each side of each series within a class that traded, that a Market Maker is willing to trade during a rolling time period after which their quotations in the affected class are removed .'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \17\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \18\ thereunder. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR-MIAX-2015-47 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2015-47. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2015-47, and should be submitted on or before August 19, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-18537 Filed 7-28-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![45256 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Notices
Additionally, the commenter believes reported out of sequence and not last SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
that the SIPs should be responsible for sale eligible. The commenter also COMMISSION
market-wide determinations of whether believes that there is a need to reform
a trade is reported out of sequence and SIP governance. The Participants [Release No. 34–75509; File No. SR–MIAX–
not last sale eligible.20 The commenter responded to the commenter’s concerns, 2015–47]
suggested that the SIPs should make as discussed above, indicating why they
market-wide determinations if believe that the proposal adequately Self-Regulatory Organizations: Miami
transactions are out of sequence by addresses the issue it was meant to International Securities Exchange LLC;
comparing the incoming transaction’s address—providing additional Notice of Filing and Immediate
execution time against the execution information so that interested persons Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
time of the most recent transaction that will be able to measure the latency Change To Amend Exchange Rule 612
was last sale eligible and published. The between the consolidated data feeds and Regarding the Reset on Quote
Participants stated that the Participants Functionality Included in the MIAX
industry proprietary data feeds. The
have historically determined last sale Aggregate Risk Manager
Participants stated that including
eligibility and out of sequence reporting
pursuant to their own rules 21 and additional timestamps would delay
July 23, 2015.
believe that such determinations should implementation of the proposal, add
costs, and could be confusing. The Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
continue to be made by the Participants
Participants also indicated that they Securities Exchange Act of 1934
consistent with their respective rules.22
continue to believe they should decide, (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2
In addition, the Participants noted that
this suggestion is outside the scope of consistent with their rules, whether notice is hereby given that on July 13,
the Amendment.23 trades are reported out of sequence and 2015, Miami International Securities
not last sale eligible. The Commission Exchange LLC (‘‘MIAX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
IV. Discussion and Commission agrees with the Participants’ response to filed with the Securities and Exchange
Findings the issues raised by the comment letter. Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
After careful review and proposed rule change as described in
The proposal is consistent with Items I, II, and III below, which Items
consideration of the proposed Section 11A(a)(1)(C)(iii) of the Act,27
Amendment, the comment letter, and have been prepared by the Exchange.
which sets forth Congress’ finding that The Commission is publishing this
the Response Letter, the Commission
it is in the public interest and notice to solicit comments on the
finds that the proposed Amendment to
appropriate for the protection of proposed rule change from interested
the Plan is consistent with the
investors and the maintenance of fair persons.
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder,24 and, in and orderly markets to assure the
availability to brokers, dealers, and I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
particular, Section 11A(a)(1) of the
investors of information with respect to Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Act 25 and Rule 608 thereunder 26 in that
quotations and transactions in the Proposed Rule Change
they are necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of securities. These goals are furthered by
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
investors and the maintenance of fair the proposed changes requiring that
amend Exchange Rule 612 concerning
and orderly markets, to remove Participants add timestamps to their the Reset on Quote functionality
impediments to, and perfect the trade and quotation reports as this will included in the MIAX Aggregate Risk
mechanisms of, a national market add transparency regarding the latencies Manager.
system. While supporting the timestamp between the Nasdaq/UTP Plan’s
Amendments, the commenter raised consolidated data feeds and industry The text of the proposed rule change
three issues regarding the proposal—the proprietary feeds. Users of the is available on the Exchange’s Web site
need to define the term ‘‘matching consolidated feeds will be better able to at http://www.miaxoptions.com/filter/
engine publication timestamp’’ more monitor the latency of those feeds and wotitle/rule_filing, at MIAX’s principal
clearly, the need for additional office, and at the Commission’s Public
to assess whether such feeds meet their
timestamps, and a preference that the Reference Room.
trading and other requirements.
SIPs determine whether a trade is II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
V. Conclusion
20 See
Statement of the Purpose of, and
SIFMA Letter at 3.
21 See It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Response Letter at 4.
22 The commenter also called for change in the Section 11A of the Act,28 the rules Change
governance structure of NMS plans which it states thereunder, that the proposed
is ineffective and opaque, suggesting that governing In its filing with the Commission, the
Amendment to Nasdaq/UTP Plan (File
bodies of NMS plans should include representatives Exchange included statements
from broker-dealers, asset managers, and the public, No. S7–24–89) is approved.
concerning the purpose of and basis for
with each of these groups having voting power on For the Commission, by the Division of
the plans’ operating committees. See SIFMA Letter
the proposed rule change and discussed
at 4. The Participants noted that the Plans held Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated any comments it received on the
numerous meetings to fashion the timestamp tools authority.29 proposed rule change. The text of these
including meetings among the Participants and Plan Robert W. Errett, statements may be examined at the
subcommittees, Commission staff, and also
involved consultation with industry representatives Deputy Secretary. places specified in Item IV below. The
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
from the Plan’s Advisory Committees. See Response [FR Doc. 2015–18393 Filed 7–28–15; 8:45 am] Exchange has prepared summaries, set
Letter at 2. forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
23 See Response Letter at 4. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
24 The Commission has considered the proposed
the most significant aspects of such
Amendment’s impact on efficiency, competition,
statements.
27 15 U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1)(C)(iii).
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
25 15 U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1). 28 15 U.S.C. 78k–1. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
26 17 CFR 240.608. 29 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(27). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:33 Jul 28, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM 29JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_45401/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 145 / Wednesday, July 29, 2015 / Notices 45259
burden on competition not necessary or Electronic Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
appropriate in furtherance of the COMMISSION
purposes of the Act, and believes the • Use the Commission’s Internet
proposed change will in fact enhance comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
[Release No. 34–75516; File No. SR–C2–
competition.16 rules/sro.shtml); or
2015–021]
• Send an email to rule-comments@
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
Statement on Comments on the
MIAX–2015–47 on the subject line. Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others Notice of Filing and Immediate
Paper Comments
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Written comments were neither • Send paper comments in triplicate Change Relating to Price Check
solicited nor received. to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Parameters
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
III. Date of Effectiveness of the July 23, 2015.
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Commission Action All submissions should refer to File Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Number SR–MIAX–2015–47. This file ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
Because the foregoing proposed rule number should be included on the
change does not: (i) Significantly affect notice is hereby given that on July 17,
subject line if email is used. To help the 2015, C2 Options Exchange,
the protection of investors or the public
Commission process and review your Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’)
interest; (ii) impose any significant
comments more efficiently, please use filed with the Securities and Exchange
burden on competition; and (iii) become
only one method. The Commission will Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
operative for 30 days after the date of
the filing, or such shorter time as the post all comments on the Commission’s proposed rule change as described in
Commission may designate, it has Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ Items I and II below, which Items have
become effective pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the been prepared by the Exchange. The
of the Act 17 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 18 submission, all subsequent Commission is publishing this notice to
thereunder. amendments, all written statements solicit comments on the proposed rule
with respect to the proposed rule change from interested persons.
At any time within 60 days of the change that are filed with the
filing of the proposed rule change, the I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Commission, and all written
Commission summarily may Statement of the Terms of Substance of
communications relating to the
temporarily suspend such rule change if
proposed rule change between the the Proposed Rule Change
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the The Exchange proposes to amend
public interest, for the protection of Rules 6.13 and 6.17 relating to price
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be check parameters on the Exchange. The
the purposes of the Act. If the text of the proposed rule change is
Commission takes such action, the available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public provided in Exhibit 5 and is also
Commission shall institute proceedings available on the Exchange’s Web site
to determine whether the proposed rule Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
should be approved or disapproved. CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
business days between the hours of
IV. Solicitation of Comments 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
filing also will be available for and at the Commission’s Public
Interested persons are invited to Reference Room.
submit written data, views, and inspection and copying at the principal
arguments concerning the foregoing, offices of the Exchange. All comments II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
including whether the proposed rule received will be posted without change; Statement of the Purpose of, and
change is consistent with the Act. the Commission does not edit personal Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Comments may be submitted by any of identifying information from Change
the following methods: submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make In its filing with the Commission, the
16 The available publicly. All submissions Exchange included statements
Commission notes that, in the Form 19b-
4, the Exchange states that the proposed rule change should refer to File Number SR–MIAX– concerning the purpose of and basis for
‘‘is based in part on the rules of another options 2015–47, and should be submitted on or the proposed rule change and discussed
exchange,’’ Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. any comments it received on the
Rule 8.18, ‘‘which gives Market Makers the ability before August 19, 2015.
to specify a maximum cumulative percentage, proposed rule change. The text of these
For the Commission, by the Division of
defined as the sum of the percentages of the original statements may be examined at the
quoted size of each side of each series within a class
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
places specified in Item IV below. The
that traded, that a Market Maker is willing to trade
during a rolling time period after which their
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
Robert W. Errett,
quotations in the affected class are removed .’’ forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
17 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). Deputy Secretary. the most significant aspects of such
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b- [FR Doc. 2015–18537 Filed 7–28–15; 8:45 am] statements.
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement. 19 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:33 Jul 28, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM 29JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_45401/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 13:06:15
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 13:06:15
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 45256 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR