80 FR 45952 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 148 (August 3, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 148 (August 3, 2015)
| Page Range | 45952-45954 | |
| FR Document | 2015-18976 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 45952-45954] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-18976] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department finds that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless [[Page 45953]] there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90- day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after August 2015, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. Opportunity to Request a Review: Not later than the last day of August 2015,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in August for the following periods: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period of review ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping duty proceedings Germany: Seamless Line and Pressure Pipe, A-428-820....... 8/1/14-7/31/15 Sodium Nitrite, A-428-841........................ 8/1/14-7/31/15 Italy: Granular Polytetrafluorethylene Resin, A-475- 8/1/14-7/31/15 703................................................. Japan: Brass Sheet & Strip, A-588-704................... 8/1/14-7/31/15 Tin Mill Products, A-588-854..................... 8/1/14-7/31/15 Malaysia: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, A-557-813 8/1/14-7/31/15 Mexico: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube, A-201- 8/1/14-7/31/15 836................................................. Republic of Korea: Large Power Transformers, A-580-867.............. 8/1/14-7/31/15 Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube, A-580-859 8/1/14-7/31/15 Romania: Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and 8/1/14-7/31/15 Pressure Pipe, (Under 4 \1/2\ Inches), A-485-805.... Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Frozen Fish Fillets, A- 8/1/14-7/31/15 552-801............................................. Thailand: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, A-549-821 8/1/14-7/31/15 The People's Republic of China: Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and 8/1/14-7/31/15 Parts Thereof, A-570-888........................ Laminated Woven Sacks, A-570-916................. 8/1/14-7/31/15 Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube, A-570-914 8/1/14-7/31/15 Petroleum Wax Candles, A-570-504................. 8/1/14-7/31/15 Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, A-570-886...... 8/1/14-7/31/15 Sodium Nitrite, A-570-925........................ 8/1/14-7/31/15 Steel Nails, A-570-909........................... 8/1/14-7/31/15 Sulfanilic Acid, A-570-815....................... 8/1/14-7/31/15 Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol, A-570-887............ 8/1/14-7/31/15 Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Parts Thereof, A-570- 8/1/14-7/31/15 939............................................. Woven Electric Blankets, A-570-951............... 8/1/14-7/31/15 Ukraine: Silicomanganese, A-823-805.................. 8/1/14-7/31/15 Countervailing Duty Proceedings Republic of Korea: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in 1/1/14-12/31/14 Coils, C-580-835.................................... The People's Republic of China: Laminated Woven Sacks, C-570-917................. 1/1/14-12/31/14 Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube, C-570-915 1/1/14-12/31/14 Sodium Nitrite, C-570-926........................ 1/1/14-12/31/14 Suspension Agreements None. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page 45954]] In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, as explained in Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), the Department clarified its practice with regard to the conditional review of the non-market economy (NME) entity in administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. The Department will no longer consider the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\3\ In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'') on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS Web site at http://access.trade.gov.\4\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received by the last day of August 2015. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of August 2015, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: July 27, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2015-18976 Filed 7-31-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![45952 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 148 / Monday, August 3, 2015 / Notices
information. Therefore, we calculated a the base sheet, made of pulp and filler Background
simple average of Port Hawkesbury’s (typically, but not limited to, clay, talc, or
other mineral additive), is processed through Each year during the anniversary
and Resolute’s rates.6 month of the publication of an
a set of supercalenders, a supercalender, or
Verification a soft nip calender operation.1 antidumping or countervailing duty
The scope of this investigation covers all order, finding, or suspended
As provided in section 782(i)(1) of the SC paper regardless of basis weight,
Act, we intend to verify the information investigation, an interested party, as
brightness, opacity, smoothness, or grade, defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff
submitted by the respondents prior to and whether in rolls or in sheets. Further, the
making our final determination. scope covers all SC paper that meets the
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
scope definition regardless of the type of may request, in accordance with 19 CFR
Disclosure and Public Comment pulp fiber or filler material used to produce 351.213, that the Department of
The Department intends to disclose to the paper. Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
interested parties the calculations Specifically excluded from the scope are an administrative review of that
performed in connection with this imports of paper printed with final content antidumping or countervailing duty
of printed text or graphics. order, finding, or suspended
preliminary determination within five Subject merchandise primarily enters
days of its public announcement.7 investigation.
under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
Interested parties may submit case and United States (HTSUS) subheading All deadlines for the submission of
rebuttal briefs,8 and request a hearing.9 4802.61.3035, but may also enter under comments or actions by the Department
For a schedule of the deadlines for filing subheadings 4802.61.3010, 4802.62.3000, discussed below refer to the number of
case briefs, rebuttal briefs, and hearing 4802.62.6020, and 4802.69.3000. Although calendar days from the applicable
requests, see the Preliminary Decision the HTSUS subheadings are provided for starting date.
convenience and customs purposes, the
Memorandum. written description of the scope of the Respondent Selection
U.S. International Trade Commission investigation is dispositive. In the event the Department limits the
(ITC) Notification Appendix 2 number of respondents for individual
In accordance with section 703(f) of examination for administrative reviews
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
the Act, we will notify the ITC of our Decision Memorandum
initiated pursuant to requests made for
determination. In addition, we are the orders identified below, the
I. Summary
making available to the ITC all non- Department intends to select
II. Background
privileged and non-proprietary III. Scope Comments respondents based on U.S. Customs and
information relating to this IV. Scope of the Investigation Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
investigation. We will allow the ITC V. Injury Test imports during the period of review. We
access to all privileged and business VI. Subsidies Valuation intend to release the CBP data under
proprietary information in our files, VII. Analysis of Programs Administrative Protective Order
VIII. Calculation of the All Others Rate (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO
provided the ITC confirms that it will
IX. ITC Notification within five days of publication of the
not disclose such information, either X. Disclosure and Public Comment
publicly or under an administrative XI. Verification initiation notice and to make our
protective order, without the written XII. Conclusion decision regarding respondent selection
consent of the Assistant Secretary for within 21 days of publication of the
[FR Doc. 2015–18980 Filed 7–31–15; 8:45 am]
Enforcement and Compliance. initiation Federal Register notice.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
In accordance with section 705(b)(2) Therefore, we encourage all parties
of the Act, if our final determination is interested in commenting on respondent
affirmative, the ITC will make its final DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE selection to submit their APO
determination within 45 days after the applications on the date of publication
Department makes its final International Trade Administration of the initiation notice, or as soon
determination. thereafter as possible. The Department
This determination is issued and Antidumping or Countervailing Duty invites comments regarding the CBP
published pursuant to sections 703(f) Order, Finding, or Suspended data and respondent selection within
and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR Investigation; Opportunity To Request five days of placement of the CBP data
351.205(c). Administrative Review on the record of the review.
Dated: July 27, 2015. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, In the event the Department decides
Paul Piquado, International Trade Administration, it is necessary to limit individual
Department of Commerce. examination of respondents and
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance. conduct respondent selection under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
Appendix 1 Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
In general, the Department finds that
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit,
Scope of the Investigation determinations concerning whether
Enforcement and Compliance,
particular companies should be
The merchandise covered by this International Trade Administration,
investigation is supercalendered paper (SC ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
paper). SC paper is uncoated paper that has entity for purposes of calculating
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
undergone a calendering process in which antidumping duty rates) require a
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
substantial amount of detailed
482–4735.
6 We have calculated the simple average of the information and analysis, which often
two responding firm’s rates for the all-others rate 1 Supercalendering and soft nip calendering require follow-up questions and
using the following calculation: (20.33 (Port analysis. Accordingly, the Department
processing, in conjunction with the mineral filler
Hawkesbury’s calculated rate) + 2.04 (Resolute’s
calculated rate))/2 = 11.19 (the all others rate).
contained in the base paper, are performed to will not conduct collapsing analyses at
enhance the surface characteristics of the paper by the respondent selection phase of this
7 See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
imparting a smooth and glossy printing surface.
8 See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d).
Supercalendering and soft nip calendering also review and will not collapse companies
9 See 19 CFR 351.510. increase the density of the base paper. at the respondent selection phase unless
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:35 Jul 31, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_46100/page/1.svg)
![45954 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 148 / Monday, August 3, 2015 / Notices
In accordance with 19 CFR in Department Practice for Respondent Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
351.213(b), an interested party as Selection in Antidumping Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may Proceedings and Conditional Review of Investigation’’ for requests received by
request in writing that the Secretary the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME the last day of August 2015. If the
conduct an administrative review. For Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR Department does not receive, by the last
both antidumping and countervailing 65963 (November 4, 2013), the day of August 2015, a request for review
duty reviews, the interested party must Department clarified its practice with of entries covered by an order, finding,
specify the individual producers or regard to the conditional review of the or suspended investigation listed in this
exporters covered by an antidumping non-market economy (NME) entity in notice and for the period identified
finding or an antidumping or administrative reviews of antidumping above, the Department will instruct CBP
countervailing duty order or suspension duty orders. The Department will no to assess antidumping or countervailing
agreement for which it is requesting a longer consider the NME entity as an duties on those entries at a rate equal to
review. In addition, a domestic exporter conditionally subject to the cash deposit of (or bond for)
interested party or an interested party administrative reviews. Accordingly, estimated antidumping or
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act the NME entity will not be under review countervailing duties required on those
must state why it desires the Secretary unless the Department specifically entries at the time of entry, or
to review those particular producers or receives a request for, or self-initiates, a withdrawal from warehouse, for
exporters. If the interested party intends review of the NME entity.3 In consumption and to continue to collect
for the Secretary to review sales of administrative reviews of antidumping the cash deposit previously ordered.
merchandise by an exporter (or a duty orders on merchandise from NME For the first administrative review of
producer if that producer also exports countries where a review of the NME any order, there will be no assessment
merchandise from other suppliers) entity has not been initiated, but where of antidumping or countervailing duties
which was produced in more than one an individual exporter for which a on entries of subject merchandise
country of origin and each country of review was initiated does not qualify for entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
origin is subject to a separate order, then a separate rate, the Department will for consumption during the relevant
the interested party must state issue a final decision indicating that the provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of
specifically, on an order-by-order basis, company in question is part of the NME the order, if such a gap period is
which exporter(s) the request is entity. However, in that situation, applicable to the period of review.
intended to cover. because no review of the NME entity This notice is not required by statute
Note that, for any party the was conducted, the NME entity’s entries but is published as a service to the
Department was unable to locate in were not subject to the review and the international trading community.
prior segments, the Department will not rate for the NME entity is not subject to
accept a request for an administrative Dated: July 27, 2015.
change as a result of that review
review of that party absent new Christian Marsh,
(although the rate for the individual
information as to the party’s location. exporter may change as a function of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
Moreover, if the interested party who and Countervailing Duty Operations.
finding that the exporter is part of the
files a request for review is unable to NME entity). [FR Doc. 2015–18976 Filed 7–31–15; 8:45 am]
locate the producer or exporter for Following initiation of an BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
which it requested the review, the antidumping administrative review
interested party must provide an when there is no review requested of the
explanation of the attempts it made to NME entity, the Department will DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
locate the producer or exporter at the instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all
same time it files its request for review, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
exporters not named in the initiation Administration
in order for the Secretary to determine notice, including those that were
if the interested party’s attempts were suspended at the NME entity rate.
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR All requests must be filed RIN 0648–XE083
351.303(f)(3)(ii). electronically in Enforcement and
As explained in Antidumping and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Council (MAFMC); Fisheries of the
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 Northeastern United States; Public
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’)
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Meeting
on Enforcement and Compliance’s
Market Economy Antidumping ACCESS Web site at http:// AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Proceedings: Assessment of access.trade.gov.4 Further, in Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
(October 24, 2011) the Department a copy of each request must be served Commerce.
clarified its practice with respect to the on the petitioner and each exporter or
collection of final antidumping duties ACTION: Notice; public meeting.
producer specified in the request.
on imports of merchandise where The Department will publish in the SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery
intermediate firms are involved. The Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation Management Council’s (Council) Spiny
public should be aware of this of Administrative Review of Dogfish Advisory Panel (AP) will meet
clarification in determining whether to to review recent fishery performance
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
request an administrative review of 3 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties
and develop a Fishery Performance
merchandise subject to antidumping should specify that they are requesting a review of
Report and/or other recommendations
findings and orders.2 entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to
the extent possible, include the names of such in preparation for the Council’s setting
Further, as explained in Antidumping exporters in their request. of specifications at the October 2015
Proceedings: Announcement of Change 4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Council meeting.
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
2 See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR DATES: The meeting will be Tuesday,
site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. 39263 (July 6, 2011). August 18, 2015 at 1:30 p.m.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:35 Jul 31, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_46100/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-23 10:51:41
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 10:51:41
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 45952 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR