80 FR 46540 - Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 150 (August 5, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 150 (August 5, 2015)
| Page Range | 46540-46541 | |
| FR Document | 2015-19246 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 46540-46541] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-19246] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-839] Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain polyester staple fiber (PSF) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the period of review (POR) May 1, 2014, through April 30, 2015, based on the timely withdrawal of the request for review. DATES: Effective date: August 5, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lana Nigro, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1779. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 1, 2015, the Department published the notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the order on PSF from Korea for the period of review May 1, 2014, through April 30, 2015.\1\ On May 29, 2015, DAK Americas LLC and Auriga Polymers, Inc., the successor to Invista, S.a.r.L (collectively, the petitioners) requested that the Department conduct an administrative review of Huvis Corporation (Huvis) and Toray Chemical Korea, Inc (Toray).\2\ On June 1, 2015, Huvis requested an administrative review of its POR sales.\3\ On June 18, 2015, the petitioners withdrew their request for an administrative review of Huvis.\4\ Huvis withdrew its request for an administrative review on June 19, 2015.\5\ Pursuant to the remaining request, for Toray, and in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department published a notice initiating [[Page 46541]] an administrative review solely of Toray.\6\ The petitioners withdrew their request for an administrative review of Toray on July 13, 2015.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 80 FR 24898, 24899 (May 1, 2015). \2\ See Letter from the petitioners to the Department, dated May 29, 2015, at 2. \3\ See Letter from Huvis to the Department, dated June 1, 2015, at 1-2. \4\ See Letter from the petitioners, dated June 18, 2015, at 2. \5\ See Letter from Huvis, dated June 19, 2015. \6\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 37588, 36464 (July 1, 2015). \7\ See Letter from the petitioners, dated July 13, 2015, at 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rescission of Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party or parties that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the publication date of the notice of initiation of the requested review. As noted above, the petitioners withdrew their request for review of Toray within 90 days of the publication date of the notice of initiation. No other parties requested an administrative review of the order. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this review in its entirety. Assessment The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of PSF from Korea. Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice of rescission of administrative review. Notifications This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under an APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: July 30, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2015-19246 Filed 8-4-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![46540 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 150 / Wednesday, August 5, 2015 / Notices
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 countervailable subsidies at the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
The Department did not receive following net countervailable subsidy
substantive responses from any rates: International Trade Administration
respondent interested party. As a result, [A–580–839]
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Net subsidy
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Exporter/manufacturer rate Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From
the Department conducted an expedited (percent) 6
the Republic of Korea: Rescission of
(120-day) sunset review of the CVD Antidumping Duty Administrative
Advance Polybag Co., Ltd .... 52.56
order on PRCBs from Vietnam. Review; 2014–2015
Fotai Vietnam Enterprise
Scope of the Order Corp. and Fotai Enterprise AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Corporation ....................... 5.28 International Trade Administration,
This order covers PRCBs. Imports of
All Others .............................. 5.28 Department of Commerce.
merchandise included within the scope
of this order are currently classifiable SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
under statistical category 3923.21.0085 Administrative Protective Order (the Department) is rescinding the
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of This notice also serves as the only administrative review of the
the United States. The Issues and antidumping duty order on certain
reminder to parties subject to
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby polyester staple fiber (PSF) from the
administrative protective order (APO) of
adopted by this notice, provides a full Republic of Korea (Korea) for the period
description of the scope of the order.5 their responsibility concerning the
of review (POR) May 1, 2014, through
The Issues and Decision return or destruction of proprietary April 30, 2015, based on the timely
Memorandum is a public document and information disclosed under APO in withdrawal of the request for review.
is on file electronically via Enforcement accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
DATES: Effective date: August 5, 2015.
and Compliance’s Antidumping and Timely notification of the return or
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Countervailing Duty Centralized destruction of APO materials or
Lana Nigro, AD/CVD Operations, Office
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). conversion to judicial protective orders
I, Enforcement and Compliance,
ACCESS is available to registered users is hereby requested. Failure to comply International Trade Administration,
at http://access.trade.gov and in the with the regulations and terms of an U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the APO is a violation which is subject to Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
main Department of Commerce sanction. Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202)
building. In addition, a complete We are issuing and publishing the 482–1779.
version of the Issues and Decision results and notice in accordance with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Memorandum can be accessed at
sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of
http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The Background
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
signed Issues and Decision On May 1, 2015, the Department
Memorandum and the electronic Dated: July 24, 2015.
published the notice of opportunity to
version of the Issues and Decision Paul Piquado, request an administrative review of the
Memorandum are identical in content. Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and order on PSF from Korea for the period
Analysis of Comments Received Compliance. of review May 1, 2014, through April
30, 2015.1 On May 29, 2015, DAK
In the Issues and Decision Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
Americas LLC and Auriga Polymers,
Memorandum, we have addressed all the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Inc., the successor to Invista, S.a.r.L
issues that parties raised in this review.
1. Summary (collectively, the petitioners) requested
The issues include the likelihood of
2. Background that the Department conduct an
continuation or recurrence of 3. Scope of the Order administrative review of Huvis
countervailable subsidies and the net 4. History of the Order Corporation (Huvis) and Toray
countervailable subsidies likely to 5. Discussion of the Issues Chemical Korea, Inc (Toray).2 On June
prevail if the Department revoked the a. Likelihood of Continuation or 1, 2015, Huvis requested an
order. Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy administrative review of its POR sales.3
Final Results of Sunset Review b. Net Countervailable Subsidy Likely To On June 18, 2015, the petitioners
Prevail withdrew their request for an
Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3)
6. Nature of the Subsidies administrative review of Huvis.4 Huvis
of the Act, we determine that revocation
7. Final Results of Sunset Review withdrew its request for an
of the CVD Order would be likely to
8. Recommendation administrative review on June 19,
lead to continuation or recurrence of
[FR Doc. 2015–19248 Filed 8–4–15; 8:45 am] 2015.5 Pursuant to the remaining
4 See Letter from the Committee to the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P request, for Toray, and in accordance
Department, entitled ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), the
Of Countervailing Duty Order On Polyethylene Department published a notice initiating
Retail Carrier Bags From The Socialist Republic Of
Vietnam: Domestic Industry’s Substantive 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Response,’’ dated May 1, 2015.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
5 See ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 80 FR 24898,
Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review
24899 (May 1, 2015).
of the Countervailing Duty Order on Polyethylene 2 See Letter from the petitioners to the
Retail Carrier Bags from the Socialist Republic Of
Vietnam,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Department, dated May 29, 2015, at 2.
3 See Letter from Huvis to the Department, dated
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for June 1, 2015, at 1–2.
6 Chin Sheng Company, Ltd. was excluded from 4 See Letter from the petitioners, dated June 18,
Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently
with this notice (Issues and Decision the order as the company received a de minimis rate 2015, at 2.
Memorandum). in the original investigation. 5 See Letter from Huvis, dated June 19, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:54 Aug 04, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_46690/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 150 / Wednesday, August 5, 2015 / Notices 46541
an administrative review solely of is hereby requested. Failure to comply 2015, in accordance with section 751(a)
Toray.6 The petitioners withdrew their with the regulations and terms of an of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
request for an administrative review of APO is a sanctionable violation. (Act) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we
Toray on July 13, 2015.7 This notice is issued and published in initiated an administrative review of the
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and order on SSB with respect to Gerdau.4
Rescission of Review
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as On July 13, 2015, the petitioners timely
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). withdrew their request for an
Department will rescind an administrative review of Gerdau.5
Dated: July 30, 2015.
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party or parties that Christian Marsh, Rescission of Review
requested a review withdraws the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
request within 90 days of the and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Department will rescind an
publication date of the notice of [FR Doc. 2015–19246 Filed 8–4–15; 8:45 am]
administrative review if a party that
initiation of the requested review. As BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P requested a review withdraws the
noted above, the petitioners withdrew request within 90 days of the date of
their request for review of Toray within publication of notice of initiation of the
90 days of the publication date of the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE requested review. The petitioners
notice of initiation. No other parties withdrew their request for review
International Trade Administration
requested an administrative review of within the 90-day time limit. Because
the order. Therefore, in accordance with [A–469–805] no other party requested a review of
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding Gerdau, we are rescinding this
this review in its entirety. Stainless Steel Bar from Spain: administrative review of the order on
Rescission of Antidumping Duty SSB from Spain.
Assessment Administrative Review; 2014–2015
The Department will instruct U.S. Assessment
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, The Department will instruct U.S.
assess antidumping duties on all Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
appropriate entries of PSF from Korea. Department of Commerce.
assess antidumping duties on all
Antidumping duties shall be assessed at SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
appropriate entries of SSB from Spain
rates equal to the cash deposit of (the Department) is rescinding its
during the POR at rates equal to the cash
estimated antidumping duties required administrative review of the
deposit rate of estimated antidumping
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from antidumping duty order on stainless
duties required at the time of entry, or
warehouse, for consumption in steel bar (SSB) from Spain for the period
withdrawal from warehouse, for
accordance with 19 CFR of review (POR) March 1, 2014, through
consumption, in accordance with 19
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department February 28, 2015.
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment DATES: Effective date: August 5, 2015.
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: instructions to CBP 15 days after
date of publication of this notice of Andre Gziryan or Minoo Hatten AD/ publication of this notice in the Federal
rescission of administrative review. CVD Operations Office I, Enforcement Register.
Notifications and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution This notice serves as a final reminder
reminder to importers of their Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; to importers of their responsibility
responsibility under 19 CFR telephone: (202) 482–2201 and (202) under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 482–1690, respectively. certificate regarding the reimbursement
regarding the reimbursement of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: of antidumping duties prior to
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
liquidation of the relevant entries
of the relevant entries during this Background during this review period. Failure to
review period. Failure to comply with On March 2, 2015, the Department comply with this requirement could
this requirement could result in the published a notice of opportunity to result in the Department’s presumption
presumption that reimbursement of request an administrative review of the that reimbursement of antidumping
antidumping duties occurred and the antidumping duty order on SSB from duties occurred and the subsequent
subsequent assessment of double Spain for the POR.1 On March 31, 2015, assessment of doubled antidumping
antidumping duties. the petitioners 2 requested an
This notice also serves as a final duties.
administrative review of the order with
reminder to parties subject to Notification Regarding Administrative
respect to Gerdau Aceros Especiales
administrative protective order (APO) of Protective Order
Europa, S.L. (Gerdau).3 On April 30,
their responsibility concerning the This notice also serves as a reminder
return or destruction of proprietary 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, to parties subject to administrative
information disclosed under an APO in Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity protective order (APO) of their
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). To Request Administrative Review, 80 FR 11161
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(March 2, 2015).
responsibility concerning the
Timely written notification of the return disposition of proprietary information
2 Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible
or destruction of APO materials, or
Industries EEC, Electralloy, a Division of G.O.
conversion to judicial protective order, Carlson, Inc., North American Stainless, Universal 4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
6 See Initiation of Antidumping and Slater Stainless, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners) 24233 (April 30, 2015).
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 3 See Letter from the petitioners to the 5 See Letter from the petitioners to the
37588, 36464 (July 1, 2015). Department, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar from Spain; Department, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar from Spain:
7 See Letter from the petitioners, dated July 13, Petitioners’ Request for 2014/2015 Administrative Petitioners’ Withdrawal of Request for 2014/2015
2015, at 2. Review’’ (March 31, 2015). Administrative Review’’ (July 13, 2015).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:54 Aug 04, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_46690/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-23 10:53:26
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 10:53:26
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective date: August 5, 2015. | |
| Contact | Lana Nigro, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1779. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 46540 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR