80_FR_46973 80 FR 46822 - Organization and Functions of the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

80 FR 46822 - Organization and Functions of the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 151 (August 6, 2015)

Page Range46822-46824
FR Document2015-18318

This rule amends the quorum and voting regulations of the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB). The amendments add a requirement for the Chairperson to place notation votes that have been calendared for discussion at a Board Meeting to the agenda of a public meeting within 90 days of the calendared notation vote. The rule also adds a requirement for the Chairperson to conduct a minimum of four public meetings per year in Washington, DC.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 151 (Thursday, August 6, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46822-46824]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18318]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD

40 CFR Part 1600


Organization and Functions of the Chemical Safety and Hazard 
Investigation Board

AGENCY: Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends the quorum and voting regulations of the 
Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB). The amendments 
add a requirement for the Chairperson to place notation votes that have 
been calendared for discussion at a Board Meeting to the agenda of a 
public meeting within 90 days of the calendared notation vote. The rule 
also adds a requirement for the Chairperson to conduct a minimum of 
four public meetings per year in Washington, DC.

DATES: Effective August 6, 2015.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule will promote increased 
transparency and accountability for Board activities. It aligns with 
the Open Government principles of transparency, participation, and 
collaboration, as outlined in the Memorandum on Transparency and Open 
Government (74 FFR 4685, Jan. 26, 2009).
    The Board conducts most votes through a process of notation voting. 
In notation voting, Board Members may vote to approve, disapprove, or 
calendar a notation item for discussion at a public meeting. In recent 
years, notation items have been calendared but then not placed on the 
agenda for discussion at a public meeting of the Board. The addition of 
language to 40 CFR 1600.5(b) will ensure that calendaring is used in 
the way it was intended. It will require the consideration of 
calendared notation votes at a public meeting within 90 days of the 
calendaring action. Prior to the adoption of this amendment to the 
rule, calendaring

[[Page 46823]]

could amount to a veto by a single Member even when other Members 
wished to vote on the item. This added language will prevent that 
action and preserve only the original intent of calendaring. 40 CFR 
1600.5(b) of this rule was amended to state that a ``notation vote to 
schedule a public meeting may not be calendared.'' This change is 
intended to require a straight vote when one or more members may be 
reluctant to schedule a public meeting. The result is intended to 
provide an opportunity for important substantive business of the Board 
to be discussed publicly.
    New paragraph (c) adds provisions to ensure that the Board meets at 
least quarterly to review important CSB mission work and reaffirms the 
authority of all Board Members to add items for discussion to the 
agendas of such CSB public meetings. This provision reinforces the 
policy of the Board (in Board Order 1, Section 9.b.2) that permits 
members to request public meeting agenda additions or changes. The 
amended rule also requires that the Board's quarterly meetings 
consider, at a minimum, calendared notation votes, important mission-
related activities, and quarterly agency action plan progress. This 
portion of the rule is also intended to increase the transparency of 
Board actions, to promote the Board's accountability to the public, and 
to ensure regular, relevant feedback is received from the public 
related to the agency's mission work.
    Although not required for this action, the Board published the 
proposed amendments in the Federal Register and provided thirty days 
for public comment.
    The CSB received two written comments during the written comment 
period and several oral public comments at a meeting on June 18, 2015. 
The written comments have been posted to the CSB Web site at http://www.csb.gov/about-the-csb/public-comments/, and the oral comments 
concerning the rule are in the transcript of the discussion which took 
place on June 18, 2015.
    One written comment and each of the oral comments were favorable. 
The written comment from the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, 
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers 
International Union (USW), supported the rule because it will increase 
the transparency of the Board's actions and facilitate stakeholder 
involvement and CSB accountability. The USW fully supports the decision 
to hold regular quarterly business meetings, but noted that a method 
for participation by phone for those not in the Washington area is 
important. The comment also supported the rule's new requirements that 
calendared notation items be discussed in public within 90 days and 
that all Board Members may add items to public meeting agendas.
    The USW also noted that Board Members should not cancel any 
investigation without sufficient notification to stakeholders. Earlier 
this year, the CSB voted to terminate three investigations at a meeting 
on January 28, 2015, even though the Federal Register notice (80 FR 
2392 (Jan. 16, 2015)) did not provide specific notice that the Board 
might take such an action. The Board received criticism for providing 
inadequate notice. New section (ii) of this rule provides in pertinent 
part that each quarterly meeting shall include as an agenda item a 
``review by the Board of the schedule for completion of all open 
investigations, studies, and other important work of the Board.'' If 
the Board were considering the cancellation of a particular 
investigation, such a discussion should occur at a quarterly meeting 
under this general agenda item. Without specifically stating such a 
possibility, interested members of the public might not be aware that 
the Board could vote to cancel a specific investigation at a quarterly 
public meeting.
    An oral public comment from the American Chemistry Council was 
supportive of the amended rule.
    The CSB also received a negative comment from Public Employees for 
Environmental Responsibility (PEER). PEER commented that the thirty day 
comment period was insufficient. However, as noted above, this rule 
could have been published as a final rule without any public comment 
period, and the Board also scheduled a public meeting to discuss the 
proposed changes and to provide an additional opportunity for public 
input.
    PEER also noted that the rule could force the Board to hold a 
public meeting every single workday to accommodate this requirement to 
consider calendared notation items within ninety days. The Board does 
not share this concern. Because the Board will hold quarterly and other 
public meetings, the Board would rarely need to convene a special 
meeting solely to consider a calendared notation item.
    PEER expressed concern that the Washington, DC, location for 
business meetings was not convenient to all stakeholders. With respect 
to this concern, the CSB has provided and plans to continue to provide 
an opportunity for teleconference or webcast participation in the four 
meetings in Washington, DC. The CSB will also continue to conduct 
public meetings, as appropriate, throughout the United States.
    PEER recommended undertaking a cost benefit analysis of the rule 
before finalizing it due to a concern that the proposed rule could 
negatively impact public meetings held in communities in which an 
accident has occurred. PEER noted that the CSB appears to lack the 
personnel and resources to hold both Washington, DC and community-based 
meetings effectively. The Board shares this important concern. However, 
the Board has determined that this concern is a basis for caution, not 
a reason to delay adoption of the rule.
    The Board contemplates that the cost of regular business meetings 
in Washington, DC, will be minimal as such meetings will be conducted 
at CSB headquarters, limited in scope, and should not involve excessive 
staff time to prepare and to conduct. The Board will evaluate per 
meeting costs over the next year to ensure that these costs are 
reasonable in relation to the anticipated benefits, and consider the 
need to seek additional resources to ensure that the new rule does not 
negatively impact community based public meetings.
    Having considered these comments, the Board has determined that the 
rule should be finalized without additional changes at this time. The 
Board plans to review the rule a year from its adoption to ensure the 
revisions have succeeded in accomplishing the primary objectives of 
improving transparency and accountability to stakeholders.

    Statutory Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301, 552(a)(1); 42 U.S.C. 
7412(r)(6)(N).

Regulatory Impact

    Administrative Procedure Act: 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), provides that 
when regulations involve matters of agency organization, procedure, or 
practice, the agency may publish regulations in final form without 
notice and comment. Because this rule is intended to promote public 
participation and transparency for Board activities, however, the Board 
provided thirty days for public comment and an opportunity for public 
comments on June 18, 2015, when Board Members met in Washington, DC (80 
FR 32339 (June 8, 2015)).
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act: This regulation 
is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. Because this regulation involves 
internal agency procedures and quarterly business meetings, this 
regulation: a. Does not have an annual

[[Page 46824]]

effect on the economy of $100 million or more. b. Will not cause a 
major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, 
Federal, State, local government agencies or geographic regions. c. 
Does not have a significant adverse effect on competition, employment, 
investment, productivity, innovation or the ability of U.S.-based 
enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act: The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires that a rule that has a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, small 
businesses, or small organizations must include an initial regulatory 
flexibility analysis describing the regulation's impact on such small 
entities. This analysis need not be undertaken if the agency has 
certified that the regulation will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). The 
CSB has considered the impact of this rule under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, and certifies that a final rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    Paperwork Reduction Act: The CSB reviewed this rule to determine 
whether it involves issues that would subject it to the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA). The CSB has determined that that the rule does not 
require a ``collection of information'' under the PRA.
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995: The rule does not require the 
preparation of an assessment statement in accordance with the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531. This rule does not include 
a federal mandate that may result in the annual expenditure by state, 
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private 
sector, of more than the annual threshold established by the Act ($128 
million in 2006, adjusted annually for inflation).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 1600

    Administrative practice and procedure.

    Dated: July 22, 2015.
Rick Engler,
Board Member.

    Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the 
Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board amends 40 CFR part 1600 
as follows:

PART 1600--ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 
HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD

0
1. The authority citation continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301, 552(a)(1); 42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(6)(N).


0
2. Amend Sec.  1600.5 by revising paragraph (b) and adding a new 
paragraph (c) to read as follows:


Sec.  1600.5  Quorum and voting requirements.

* * * * *
    (b) Voting. The Board votes on items of business in meetings 
conducted pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act. 
Alternatively, whenever a Member of the Board is of the opinion that 
joint deliberation among the members of the Board upon any matter at a 
meeting is unnecessary in light of the nature of the matter, 
impracticable, or would impede the orderly disposition of agency 
business, such matter may be disposed of by employing notation voting 
procedures. A written notation of the vote of each participating Board 
member shall be recorded by the General Counsel who shall retain it in 
the records of the Board. If a Board member votes to calendar a 
notation item, the Board must consider the calendared notation item at 
a public meeting of the Board within 90 days of the date on which the 
item is calendared. A notation vote to schedule a public meeting may 
not be calendared. The Chairperson shall add any calendared notation 
item to the agenda for the next CSB public meeting if one is to occur 
within 90 days or to schedule a special meeting to consider any 
calendared notation item no later than 90 days from the calendar 
action.
    (c) Public Meetings and Agendas. The Chairperson, or in the absence 
of a chairperson, a member designated by the Board, shall schedule a 
minimum of four public meetings per year in Washington, DC, to take 
place during the months of October, January, April, and July.
    (1) Agenda. The Chairperson, or in the absence of a chairperson, a 
member designated by the Board, shall be responsible for preparation of 
a final meeting agenda. The final agenda may not differ in substance 
from the items published in the Sunshine Act notice for that meeting. 
Any member may submit agenda items related to CSB business for 
consideration at any public meeting, and the Chairperson shall include 
such items on the agenda. At a minimum, each quarterly meeting shall 
include the following agenda items:
    (i) Consideration and vote on any notation items calendared since 
the date of the last public meeting;
    (ii) A review by the Board of the schedule for completion of all 
open investigations, studies, and other important work of the Board; 
and
    (iii) A review and discussion by the Board of the progress in 
meeting the CSB's Annual Action Plan.
    (2) Publication of agenda information. The Chairperson shall be 
responsible for posting information related to any agenda item that is 
appropriate for public release on the CSB Web site no less than two 
days prior to a public meeting.

[FR Doc. 2015-18318 Filed 8-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P



                                                46822             Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                                The Codex Alimentarius is a joint                       in the preemption provisions of FFDCA                 § 180.411 Fluazifop-P-butyl; tolerances for
                                                United Nations Food and Agriculture                     section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency                residues.
                                                Organization/World Health                               has determined that this action will not                  (a) * * *
                                                Organization food standards program,                    have a substantial direct effect on States
                                                and it is recognized as an international                or tribal governments, on the                                                                        Parts
                                                food safety standards-setting                           relationship between the national                                   Commodity                         per
                                                                                                                                                                                                             million
                                                organization in trade agreements to                     government and the States or tribal
                                                which the United States is a party. EPA                 governments, or on the distribution of
                                                may establish a tolerance that is                       power and responsibilities among the                    *         *          *               *          *
                                                different from a Codex MRL; however,                    various levels of government or between               Sweet potato, roots ........................    1.5
                                                FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that                   the Federal Government and Indian
                                                EPA explain the reasons for departing                   tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined               *        *     *       *       *
                                                from the Codex level.                                   that Executive Order 13132, entitled                  [FR Doc. 2015–18825 Filed 8–5–15; 8:45 am]
                                                   The Codex has not established a MRL                  ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,               BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                for fluazifop-P-butyl.                                  1999) and Executive Order 13175,
                                                V. Conclusion                                           entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
                                                                                                        with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR               CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD
                                                  Therefore, the tolerance is amended                   67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply                 INVESTIGATION BOARD
                                                for residues of fluazifop-P-butyl in or on              to this action. In addition, this action
                                                sweet potato, roots from 0.05 ppm to 1.5                does not impose any enforceable duty or               40 CFR Part 1600
                                                ppm.                                                    contain any unfunded mandate as
                                                VI. Statutory and Executive Order                       described under Title II of the Unfunded              Organization and Functions of the
                                                Reviews                                                 Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.                  Chemical Safety and Hazard
                                                                                                        1501 et seq.).                                        Investigation Board
                                                   This action amends a tolerance under
                                                FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a                      This action does not involve any                   AGENCY:  Chemical Safety and Hazard
                                                petition submitted to the Agency. The                   technical standards that would require                Investigation Board.
                                                Office of Management and Budget                         Agency consideration of voluntary                     ACTION: Final rule.
                                                (OMB) has exempted these types of                       consensus standards pursuant to section
                                                actions from review under Executive                     12(d) of the National Technology                      SUMMARY:   This rule amends the quorum
                                                Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory                      Transfer and Advancement Act                          and voting regulations of the Chemical
                                                Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,                     (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).                         Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
                                                October 4, 1993). Because this action                                                                         (CSB). The amendments add a
                                                                                                        VII. Congressional Review Act                         requirement for the Chairperson to place
                                                has been exempted from review under
                                                Executive Order 12866, this action is                                                                         notation votes that have been
                                                                                                          Pursuant to the Congressional Review                calendared for discussion at a Board
                                                not subject to Executive Order 13211,                   Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
                                                entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning                                                                                 Meeting to the agenda of a public
                                                                                                        submit a report containing this rule and              meeting within 90 days of the
                                                Regulations That Significantly Affect                   other required information to the U.S.
                                                Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66                                                                     calendared notation vote. The rule also
                                                                                                        Senate, the U.S. House of                             adds a requirement for the Chairperson
                                                FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive                    Representatives, and the Comptroller
                                                Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of                                                                         to conduct a minimum of four public
                                                                                                        General of the United States prior to                 meetings per year in Washington, DC.
                                                Children from Environmental Health                      publication of the rule in the Federal
                                                Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,                                                                        DATES: Effective August 6, 2015.
                                                                                                        Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
                                                April 23, 1997). This action does not                                                                         SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
                                                                                                        rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
                                                contain any information collections                                                                           rule will promote increased
                                                subject to OMB approval under the                       List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180                   transparency and accountability for
                                                Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44                                                                             Board activities. It aligns with the Open
                                                                                                          Environmental protection,                           Government principles of transparency,
                                                U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
                                                                                                        Administrative practice and procedure,                participation, and collaboration, as
                                                any special considerations under
                                                                                                        Agricultural commodities, Pesticides                  outlined in the Memorandum on
                                                Executive Order 12898, entitled
                                                                                                        and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping                Transparency and Open Government
                                                ‘‘Federal Actions to Address
                                                                                                        requirements.                                         (74 FFR 4685, Jan. 26, 2009).
                                                Environmental Justice in Minority
                                                Populations and Low-Income                                Dated: July 23, 2015.                                  The Board conducts most votes
                                                Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,                 Susan Lewis,                                          through a process of notation voting. In
                                                1994).                                                                                                        notation voting, Board Members may
                                                                                                        Director, Registration Division, Office of
                                                   Since tolerances and exemptions that                 Pesticide Programs.                                   vote to approve, disapprove, or calendar
                                                are established on the basis of a petition                                                                    a notation item for discussion at a
                                                under FFDCA section 408(d), such as                       Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is                      public meeting. In recent years, notation
                                                the tolerance in this final rule, do not                amended as follows:                                   items have been calendared but then not
                                                require the issuance of a proposed rule,                                                                      placed on the agenda for discussion at
                                                                                                        PART 180—[AMENDED]                                    a public meeting of the Board. The
                                                the requirements of the Regulatory
                                                Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et                                                                        addition of language to 40 CFR
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                seq.), do not apply.                                    ■ 1. The authority citation for part 180              1600.5(b) will ensure that calendaring is
                                                   This action directly regulates growers,              continues to read as follows:                         used in the way it was intended. It will
                                                food processors, food handlers, and food                    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.        require the consideration of calendared
                                                retailers, not States or tribes, nor does                                                                     notation votes at a public meeting
                                                this action alter the relationships or                  ■  2. In § 180.411, revise the commodity              within 90 days of the calendaring
                                                distribution of power and                               ‘‘Sweet potato, roots’’ in the table in               action. Prior to the adoption of this
                                                responsibilities established by Congress                paragraph (a) to read as follows:                     amendment to the rule, calendaring


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:05 Aug 05, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00034   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM   06AUR1


                                                                  Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations                                             46823

                                                could amount to a veto by a single                      for those not in the Washington area is               webcast participation in the four
                                                Member even when other Members                          important. The comment also supported                 meetings in Washington, DC. The CSB
                                                wished to vote on the item. This added                  the rule’s new requirements that                      will also continue to conduct public
                                                language will prevent that action and                   calendared notation items be discussed                meetings, as appropriate, throughout the
                                                preserve only the original intent of                    in public within 90 days and that all                 United States.
                                                calendaring. 40 CFR 1600.5(b) of this                   Board Members may add items to public                    PEER recommended undertaking a
                                                rule was amended to state that a                        meeting agendas.                                      cost benefit analysis of the rule before
                                                ‘‘notation vote to schedule a public                       The USW also noted that Board                      finalizing it due to a concern that the
                                                meeting may not be calendared.’’ This                   Members should not cancel any                         proposed rule could negatively impact
                                                change is intended to require a straight                investigation without sufficient                      public meetings held in communities in
                                                vote when one or more members may be                    notification to stakeholders. Earlier this            which an accident has occurred. PEER
                                                reluctant to schedule a public meeting.                 year, the CSB voted to terminate three                noted that the CSB appears to lack the
                                                The result is intended to provide an                    investigations at a meeting on January                personnel and resources to hold both
                                                opportunity for important substantive                   28, 2015, even though the Federal                     Washington, DC and community-based
                                                business of the Board to be discussed                   Register notice (80 FR 2392 (Jan. 16,                 meetings effectively. The Board shares
                                                publicly.                                               2015)) did not provide specific notice                this important concern. However, the
                                                   New paragraph (c) adds provisions to                 that the Board might take such an                     Board has determined that this concern
                                                ensure that the Board meets at least                    action. The Board received criticism for              is a basis for caution, not a reason to
                                                quarterly to review important CSB                       providing inadequate notice. New                      delay adoption of the rule.
                                                mission work and reaffirms the                          section (ii) of this rule provides in                    The Board contemplates that the cost
                                                authority of all Board Members to add                   pertinent part that each quarterly                    of regular business meetings in
                                                items for discussion to the agendas of                  meeting shall include as an agenda item               Washington, DC, will be minimal as
                                                such CSB public meetings. This                          a ‘‘review by the Board of the schedule               such meetings will be conducted at CSB
                                                provision reinforces the policy of the                  for completion of all open                            headquarters, limited in scope, and
                                                Board (in Board Order 1, Section 9.b.2)                 investigations, studies, and other                    should not involve excessive staff time
                                                that permits members to request public                  important work of the Board.’’ If the                 to prepare and to conduct. The Board
                                                meeting agenda additions or changes.                    Board were considering the cancellation               will evaluate per meeting costs over the
                                                The amended rule also requires that the                 of a particular investigation, such a                 next year to ensure that these costs are
                                                Board’s quarterly meetings consider, at                 discussion should occur at a quarterly                reasonable in relation to the anticipated
                                                a minimum, calendared notation votes,                   meeting under this general agenda item.               benefits, and consider the need to seek
                                                important mission-related activities, and               Without specifically stating such a                   additional resources to ensure that the
                                                quarterly agency action plan progress.                  possibility, interested members of the                new rule does not negatively impact
                                                This portion of the rule is also intended               public might not be aware that the                    community based public meetings.
                                                to increase the transparency of Board                   Board could vote to cancel a specific                    Having considered these comments,
                                                actions, to promote the Board’s                         investigation at a quarterly public                   the Board has determined that the rule
                                                accountability to the public, and to                    meeting.                                              should be finalized without additional
                                                ensure regular, relevant feedback is                       An oral public comment from the                    changes at this time. The Board plans to
                                                received from the public related to the                 American Chemistry Council was                        review the rule a year from its adoption
                                                agency’s mission work.                                  supportive of the amended rule.                       to ensure the revisions have succeeded
                                                   Although not required for this action,                  The CSB also received a negative                   in accomplishing the primary objectives
                                                the Board published the proposed                        comment from Public Employees for                     of improving transparency and
                                                amendments in the Federal Register                      Environmental Responsibility (PEER).                  accountability to stakeholders.
                                                and provided thirty days for public                     PEER commented that the thirty day                      Statutory Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301,
                                                comment.                                                comment period was insufficient.                      552(a)(1); 42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(6)(N).
                                                   The CSB received two written                         However, as noted above, this rule
                                                comments during the written comment                     could have been published as a final                  Regulatory Impact
                                                period and several oral public                          rule without any public comment                         Administrative Procedure Act: 5
                                                comments at a meeting on June 18,                       period, and the Board also scheduled a                U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), provides that when
                                                2015. The written comments have been                    public meeting to discuss the proposed                regulations involve matters of agency
                                                posted to the CSB Web site at http://                   changes and to provide an additional                  organization, procedure, or practice, the
                                                www.csb.gov/about-the-csb/public-                       opportunity for public input.                         agency may publish regulations in final
                                                comments/, and the oral comments                           PEER also noted that the rule could                form without notice and comment.
                                                concerning the rule are in the transcript               force the Board to hold a public meeting              Because this rule is intended to promote
                                                of the discussion which took place on                   every single workday to accommodate                   public participation and transparency
                                                June 18, 2015.                                          this requirement to consider calendared               for Board activities, however, the Board
                                                   One written comment and each of the                  notation items within ninety days. The                provided thirty days for public
                                                oral comments were favorable. The                       Board does not share this concern.                    comment and an opportunity for public
                                                written comment from the United Steel,                  Because the Board will hold quarterly                 comments on June 18, 2015, when
                                                Paper and Forestry, Rubber,                             and other public meetings, the Board                  Board Members met in Washington, DC
                                                Manufacturing, Energy, Allied                           would rarely need to convene a special                (80 FR 32339 (June 8, 2015)).
                                                Industrial and Service Workers                          meeting solely to consider a calendared                 Small Business Regulatory
                                                International Union (USW), supported                    notation item.                                        Enforcement Fairness Act: This
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                the rule because it will increase the                      PEER expressed concern that the                    regulation is not a major rule under 5
                                                transparency of the Board’s actions and                 Washington, DC, location for business                 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
                                                facilitate stakeholder involvement and                  meetings was not convenient to all                    Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
                                                CSB accountability. The USW fully                       stakeholders. With respect to this                    Because this regulation involves
                                                supports the decision to hold regular                   concern, the CSB has provided and                     internal agency procedures and
                                                quarterly business meetings, but noted                  plans to continue to provide an                       quarterly business meetings, this
                                                that a method for participation by phone                opportunity for teleconference or                     regulation: a. Does not have an annual


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:05 Aug 05, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00035   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM   06AUR1


                                                46824             Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                                effect on the economy of $100 million                   PART 1600—ORGANIZATION AND                              (i) Consideration and vote on any
                                                or more. b. Will not cause a major                      FUNCTIONS OF THE CHEMICAL                             notation items calendared since the date
                                                increase in costs or prices for                         SAFETY AND HAZARD                                     of the last public meeting;
                                                consumers, individual industries,                       INVESTIGATION BOARD                                     (ii) A review by the Board of the
                                                Federal, State, local government                                                                              schedule for completion of all open
                                                agencies or geographic regions. c. Does                 ■ 1. The authority citation continues to              investigations, studies, and other
                                                not have a significant adverse effect on                read as follows:                                      important work of the Board; and
                                                                                                          Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552(a)(1); 42                (iii) A review and discussion by the
                                                competition, employment, investment,
                                                                                                        U.S.C. 7412(r)(6)(N).                                 Board of the progress in meeting the
                                                productivity, innovation or the ability of                                                                    CSB’s Annual Action Plan.
                                                U.S.-based enterprises to compete with                  ■ 2. Amend § 1600.5 by revising                         (2) Publication of agenda information.
                                                foreign-based enterprises.                              paragraph (b) and adding a new                        The Chairperson shall be responsible for
                                                   Regulatory Flexibility Act: The                      paragraph (c) to read as follows:                     posting information related to any
                                                Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601                                                                      agenda item that is appropriate for
                                                                                                        § 1600.5    Quorum and voting requirements.
                                                et seq.) requires that a rule that has a                                                                      public release on the CSB Web site no
                                                                                                        *      *    *     *     *                             less than two days prior to a public
                                                significant economic impact on a
                                                                                                           (b) Voting. The Board votes on items               meeting.
                                                substantial number of small entities,                   of business in meetings conducted
                                                small businesses, or small organizations                pursuant to the Government in the
                                                                                                                                                              [FR Doc. 2015–18318 Filed 8–5–15; 8:45 am]
                                                must include an initial regulatory                      Sunshine Act. Alternatively, whenever a               BILLING CODE P
                                                flexibility analysis describing the                     Member of the Board is of the opinion
                                                regulation’s impact on such small                       that joint deliberation among the
                                                entities. This analysis need not be                     members of the Board upon any matter                  FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
                                                undertaken if the agency has certified                  at a meeting is unnecessary in light of               COMMISSION
                                                that the regulation will not have a                     the nature of the matter, impracticable,              47 CFR Part 73
                                                significant economic impact on a                        or would impede the orderly disposition
                                                substantial number of small entities. 5                 of agency business, such matter may be                [GN Docket No. 12–268; FCC 15–69]
                                                U.S.C. 605(b). The CSB has considered                   disposed of by employing notation
                                                the impact of this rule under the                       voting procedures. A written notation of              Expanding the Economic and
                                                Regulatory Flexibility Act, and certifies               the vote of each participating Board                  Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum
                                                                                                        member shall be recorded by the                       through Incentive Auctions
                                                that a final rule will not have a
                                                significant economic impact on a                        General Counsel who shall retain it in                AGENCY:  Federal Communications
                                                substantial number of small entities.                   the records of the Board. If a Board                  Commission.
                                                                                                        member votes to calendar a notation                   ACTION: Final rule; petition for
                                                   Paperwork Reduction Act: The CSB
                                                                                                        item, the Board must consider the                     reconsideration.
                                                reviewed this rule to determine whether
                                                                                                        calendared notation item at a public
                                                it involves issues that would subject it                meeting of the Board within 90 days of                SUMMARY:    In this Second Order on
                                                to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).                   the date on which the item is                         Reconsideration, the Commission
                                                The CSB has determined that that the                    calendared. A notation vote to schedule               addresses petitions for reconsideration
                                                rule does not require a ‘‘collection of                 a public meeting may not be calendared.               of our Order adopting rules to
                                                information’’ under the PRA.                            The Chairperson shall add any                         implement the broadcast television
                                                   Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of                      calendared notation item to the agenda                spectrum incentive auction. Based on
                                                1995: The rule does not require the                     for the next CSB public meeting if one                the rules we adopted in the Incentive
                                                preparation of an assessment statement                  is to occur within 90 days or to schedule             Auction R&O, we are now developing
                                                in accordance with the Unfunded                         a special meeting to consider any                     the detailed procedures necessary to
                                                Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.                   calendared notation item no later than                govern the auction process. As we have
                                                                                                        90 days from the calendar action.                     stated before, our intention is to begin
                                                1531. This rule does not include a
                                                                                                           (c) Public Meetings and Agendas. The               accepting applications to participate in
                                                federal mandate that may result in the
                                                                                                        Chairperson, or in the absence of a                   the incentive auction in the fall of 2015,
                                                annual expenditure by state, local, and                                                                       and to start the bidding process in early
                                                tribal governments, in the aggregate, or                chairperson, a member designated by
                                                                                                        the Board, shall schedule a minimum of                2016. We issue this Order now in order
                                                by the private sector, of more than the                                                                       to provide certainty for prospective
                                                                                                        four public meetings per year in
                                                annual threshold established by the Act                                                                       bidders and other interested parties in
                                                                                                        Washington, DC, to take place during
                                                ($128 million in 2006, adjusted                         the months of October, January, April,                advance of the incentive auction. We
                                                annually for inflation).                                and July.                                             largely affirm our decisions in the
                                                List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 1600                       (1) Agenda. The Chairperson, or in                 Incentive Auction R&O, although we
                                                                                                        the absence of a chairperson, a member                make certain clarifications and
                                                  Administrative practice and                           designated by the Board, shall be                     modifications in response to issues
                                                procedure.                                              responsible for preparation of a final                raised by the petitioners.
                                                  Dated: July 22, 2015.                                 meeting agenda. The final agenda may                  DATES: Effective September 8, 2015,
                                                                                                        not differ in substance from the items                except for the amendment to
                                                Rick Engler,
                                                                                                        published in the Sunshine Act notice                  § 73.3700(c)(6) which contains new or
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                Board Member.                                           for that meeting. Any member may                      modified information collection
                                                  Accordingly, for the reasons set forth                submit agenda items related to CSB                    requirements that have not been
                                                                                                        business for consideration at any public              approved by Office of Management and
                                                in the preamble, the Chemical Safety
                                                                                                        meeting, and the Chairperson shall                    Budget (OMB). The Federal
                                                and Hazard Investigation Board amends
                                                                                                        include such items on the agenda. At a                Communications Commission will
                                                40 CFR part 1600 as follows:                            minimum, each quarterly meeting shall                 publish a document in the Federal
                                                                                                        include the following agenda items:                   Register announcing the effective date.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:05 Aug 05, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00036   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM   06AUR1



Document Created: 2018-02-23 10:55:46
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 10:55:46
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesEffective August 6, 2015.
FR Citation80 FR 46822 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR