80 FR 46955 - Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India and the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 151 (August 6, 2015)

Page Range		46955-46956
FR Document		2015-19358

As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP-23) from India and the People's Republic of China (the PRC) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of this notice.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 151 (Thursday, August 6, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46955-46956]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-838; A-570-892]


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India and the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of 
Antidumping Duty Orders

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of 
Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty 
orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP-23) from India and the 
People's Republic of China (the PRC) would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the 
``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of this notice.

DATES: Effective date: August 6, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaitlin Wojnar, Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at (202) 482-
3857.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On December 29, 2004, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the AD orders on CVP-23 from India and the PRC.\1\ On April 
1, 2015, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), the Department published notice of the initiation of 
the second sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on CVP-23 from 
India and the PRC.\2\ On April 13, 2015, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(1)(i), the following domestic CVP-23 producers timely 
notified the Department of their intent to participate in these 
reviews: Nation Ford Chemical Company and Sun Chemical Corporation 
(collectively, Petitioners).\3\ Petitioners claimed interested party 
status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of a 
domestic like product in the United States. On May 1, 2015, we received 
a complete substantive response for each review from Petitioners within 
the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\4\ We 
received no substantive responses from any respondent interested 
parties. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted expedited 
sunset reviews of these orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 
23 From India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004); and Antidumping Duty 
Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the People's Republic of 
China, 69 FR 77987 (December 29, 2004).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 17388 
(April 1, 2015).
    \3\ See Letters from Petitioners, ``Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 
from India/Notice of Intent to Participate in Second Sunset Review 
of Antidumping Duty Order'' and ``Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from 
the People's Republic of China/Notice of Intent to Participate in 
Second Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order,'' April 13, 2015.
    \4\ See Letters from Petitioners, ``Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 
from India/Petitioners' Substantive Response'' and ``Carbazole 
Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China/Petitioners' 
Substantive Response,'' May 1, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Orders

    The merchandise subject to this AD Order is CVP-23. Imports of 
merchandise included within the scope of this order are currently 
classifiable under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States. The Issues and Decision Memorandum, 
which is hereby adopted by this notice, provides a full description of 
the scope of the order.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Department Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum 
for the Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the 
Antidumping Duty Orders on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India 
and the People's Republic of China'' (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum), dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 
notice.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 46956]]

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in these reviews, including the likelihood of 
continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation and 
the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the orders are 
revoked, are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and 
is available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is accessible to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Department's Central Records 
Unit, Room B8024 of the Department's main building. In addition, a 
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be viewed at 
http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.

Final Results of Sunset Reviews

    Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1)-(3) of the Act, we 
determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on CVP-23 from 
India and the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of 
dumping up to the following weighted-average margin percentages:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                           Country                              dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
India.......................................................       44.80
PRC.........................................................      241.32
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 771(i)(1) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.218.

    Dated: July 30, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-19358 Filed 8-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Notices 46955

electronically via Enforcement and Administrative Protective Order Department) published the AD orders
Compliance’s Antidumping and This notice also serves as the only on CVP–23 from India and the PRC.1 On
Countervailing Duty Centralized reminder to parties subject to April 1, 2015, pursuant to section 751(c)
Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’). administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
Access to ACCESS is available to of their responsibility concerning the (the Act), the Department published
registered users at http:// return or destruction of proprietary notice of the initiation of the second
access.trade.gov and is available to all information disclosed under APO in sunset reviews of the antidumping duty
parties in the Central Records Unit, accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. orders on CVP–23 from India and the
Room B8024 of the main Department of Timely notification of the return of PRC.2 On April 13, 2015, in accordance
Commerce building. In addition, a with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), the
destruction of APO materials or
complete version of the Decision following domestic CVP–23 producers
conversion to judicial protective order is
Memorandum is available directly on timely notified the Department of their
hereby requested. Failure to comply
the Internet at http:// intent to participate in these reviews:
with the regulations and terms of an
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Nation Ford Chemical Company and
APO is a violation which is subject to
The signed Decision Memorandum and Sun Chemical Corporation (collectively,
sanction.
the electronic versions of the Decision Petitioners).3 Petitioners claimed
This sunset review and notice are in
Memorandum are identical in content. interested party status under section
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c),
771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of
Scope of the Order and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
a domestic like product in the United
For purposes of the order, the term 351.218.
States. On May 1, 2015, we received a
‘‘certain crepe paper’’ includes crepe Dated: July 24, 2015. complete substantive response for each
paper products that have a basis weight Paul Piquado, review from Petitioners within the 30-
not exceeding 29 grams per square Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and day deadline specified in 19 CFR
meter prior to being creped and, if Compliance. 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received no
appropriate, flame-proofed. Crepe paper [FR Doc. 2015–19355 Filed 8–5–15; 8:45 am] substantive responses from any
has a finely wrinkled surface texture BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P respondent interested parties. As a
and typically but not exclusively is result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
treated to be flame-retardant. Crepe of the Act and 19 CFR
paper is typically but not exclusively DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
produced as streamers in roll form and conducted expedited sunset reviews of
packaged in plastic bags. Crepe paper International Trade Administration these orders.
may or may not be bleached, dye
[A–533–838; A–570–892] Scope of the Orders
colored, surface-colored, surface
decorated or printed, glazed, sequined, Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From The merchandise subject to this AD
embossed, die-cut, and/or flame India and the People’s Republic of Order is CVP–23. Imports of
retardant. Subject crepe paper may be China: Final Results of Expedited merchandise included within the scope
rolled, flat or folded, and may be Second Sunset Reviews of of this order are currently classifiable
packaged by banding or wrapping with Antidumping Duty Orders under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the
paper, by placing in plastic bags, and/ Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
or by placing in boxes for distribution AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, United States. The Issues and Decision
and use by the ultimate consumer. International Trade Administration, Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
Packages of crepe paper subject to the Department of Commerce. by this notice, provides a full
order may consist solely of crepe paper SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset description of the scope of the order.5
of one color and/or style, or may contain reviews, the Department of Commerce
multiple colors and/or styles. The (the Department) finds that revocation 1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of

merchandise subject to the order does of the antidumping duty orders on Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
not have specific classification numbers Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP–23) India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004); and
assigned to them under the Harmonized from India and the People’s Republic of Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment
Tariff Schedule of the United States China (the PRC) would be likely to lead 23 From the People’s Republic of China, 69 FR
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Subject merchandise may to continuation or recurrence of 77987 (December 29, 2004).
be under one or more of several dumping at the levels indicated in the
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80

different HTSUS subheadings, FR 17388 (April 1, 2015).
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’ 3 See Letters from Petitioners, ‘‘Carbazole Violet
including: 4802.30; 4802.54; 4802.61; section of this notice. Pigment 23 from India/Notice of Intent to
4802.62; 4802.69; 4804.39; 4806.40; DATES: Effective date: August 6, 2015. Participate in Second Sunset Review of
4808.30; 4808.90; 4811.90; 4818.90; Antidumping Duty Order’’ and ‘‘Carbazole Violet
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China/
4823.90; 9505.90.40. The tariff
Kaitlin Wojnar, Antidumping and Notice of Intent to Participate in Second Sunset
classifications are provided for
Countervailing Duty Operations, Office Review of Antidumping Duty Order,’’ April 13,
convenience and customs purposes; 2015.
VII, Enforcement and Compliance,
however, the written description of the 4 See Letters from Petitioners, ‘‘Carbazole Violet
International Trade Administration,
scope of the order is dispositive. Pigment 23 from India/Petitioners’ Substantive
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Response’’ and ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from
Final Results of Review Street and Constitution Avenue NW., the People’s Republic of China/Petitioners’
Washington, DC 20230, at (202) 482– Substantive Response,’’ May 1, 2015.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act, 5 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and
we determine that revocation of the 3857.
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the
antidumping duty order on crepe paper SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the
from the PRC would be likely to lead to Antidumping Duty Orders on Carbazole Violet
continuation or recurrence of dumping Background Pigment 23 from India and the People’s Republic
of China’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum),
at weighted-average margins up to On December 29, 2004, the dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
266.83 percent. Department of Commerce (the this notice.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Aug 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1

46956 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Notices

Analysis of Comments Received Dated: July 30, 2015. companies subject to the instant review
Paul Piquado, are: Ester, Garware, Polyplex, SRF,
All issues raised in these reviews, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Jindal, Vacmet, and Vacmet India
including the likelihood of continuation Compliance. Limited, of which the Department has
or recurrence of dumping in the event [FR Doc. 2015–19358 Filed 8–5–15; 8:45 am] selected Jindal and SRF as the
of revocation and the magnitude of the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P mandatory respondents.2
margins likely to prevail if the orders
are revoked, are addressed in the Scope of the Order
accompanying Issues and Decision DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE For purposes of the order, the
Memorandum. The Issues and Decision products covered are all gauges of raw,
Memorandum is a public document and International Trade Administration pretreated, or primed polyethylene
is available electronically via terephthalate film, sheet and strip,
[C–533–825]
Enforcement and Compliance’s whether extruded or coextruded.
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Excluded are metallized films and other
Centralized Electronic Service System Sheet, and Strip From India: finished films that have had at least one
(ACCESS). ACCESS is accessible to Preliminary Results and Partial of their surfaces modified by the
registered users at http:// Recission of Countervailing Duty application of a performance-enhancing
access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Administrative Review; 2013 resinous or inorganic layer of more than
Department’s Central Records Unit, 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, film are classifiable in the Harmonized
Room B8024 of the Department’s main International Trade Administration, Tariff Schedule of the United States
building. In addition, a complete Department of Commerce. (HTSUS) under item number
version of the Issues and Decision
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are
Memorandum can be viewed at http:// (the Department) is conducting an provided for convenience and customs
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed administrative review under the purposes. The written description of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum and countervailing duty (CVD) order on scope of the order is dispositive.
the electronic version of the Issues and polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
Decision Memorandum are identical in Methodology
and strip (PET film) from India for the
content. period of review (POR) January 1, 2013, The Department conducted this
through December 31, 2013. We review in accordance with section
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
preliminarily determine that Jindal Poly 751(a)(l)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and Films Limited of India (Jindal) and SRF amended (the Act). For each of the
752(c)(1)–(3) of the Act, we determine Limited (SRF) received countervailable subsidy programs found
that revocation of the antidumping duty subsidies during the POR. See the countervailable, we preliminarily
orders on CVP–23 from India and the ‘‘Preliminary Results of Review’’ determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a
PRC would likely lead to continuation section, below. Interested parties are government-provided financial
or recurrence of dumping up to the invited to comment on these contribution that gives rise to a benefit
following weighted-average margin preliminary results. to the recipient, and that the subsidy is
percentages: DATES: Effective date: August 6, 2015.
specific.3 For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi
Weighted- Blum, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, conclusions, see the Memorandum from
average Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Country dumping
Enforcement and Compliance, Secretary for Antidumping and
margin International Trade Administration, Countervailing Duty Operations to
(percent) U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Secretary for Enforcement and
India ............................................ 44.80 Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
Compliance, titled ‘‘Decision
PRC ............................................ 241.32 482–0197.
Memorandum for the Preliminary
Partial Rescission of Administrative Results and Partial Rescission of the
Notification to Interested Parties Countervailing Duty (CVD)
Review
This notice serves as the only Administrative Review of Polyethylene
The Department initiated a review of
reminder to parties subject to an Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
eight companies in this proceeding.1 In
administrative protective order (APO) of (PET film) from India; 2013’’
response to timely filed withdrawal
their responsibility concerning the (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
requests, we are rescinding this
dated concurrently with, and hereby
return or destruction of proprietary administrative review with respect to
adopted by, this notice.
information disclosed under APO in MTZ and Uflex pursuant to 19 CFR The Preliminary Decision
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 351.213(d)(1). Accordingly, the Memorandum is a public document and
Timely notification of the return or is on file electronically via Enforcement
destruction of APO materials or 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
conversion to judicial protective order is Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
51548 (August 29, 2014) (Initiation Notice). The Countervailing Duty Centralized
hereby requested. Failure to comply seven companies were Ester Industries Limited Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
with the regulations and terms of an (Ester), Garware Polyester Ltd. (Garware), Jindal ACCESS is available to registered users
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

APO is a violation which is subject to Poly Films Limited of India (Jindal), MTZ
Polyesters Ltd. (MTZ), Polyplex Corporation Ltd.
at http://access.trade.gov and in the
sanction. (Polyplex), SRF Limited (SRF), and Vacmet. See
2 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
We are issuing and publishing these also, Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing
results and notice in accordance with Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 76956 3 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
(December 23, 2014). The one additional company regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 771(i)(1) of was Uflex Ltd (Uflex), which was inadvertently of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. omitted from the prior initiation notice. the Act regarding specificity.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Aug 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1

Document Created: 2018-02-23 10:55:27
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 10:55:27

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Dates		Effective date: August 6, 2015.
Contact		Kaitlin Wojnar, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at (202) 482- 3857.
FR Citation		80 FR 46955

80 FR 46955 - Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India and the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEInternational Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 151 (August 6, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration