80 FR 47448 - Petition for Reconsideration of Action in a Rulemaking Proceeding

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 152 (August 7, 2015)

Page Range		47448-47449
FR Document		2015-19374

A Petition for Reconsideration (Petition) has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding by Harold Mordkofsky, on behalf of Halstad Telephone Company.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 152 (Friday, August 7, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 152 (Friday, August 7, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47448-47449]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19374]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 54

[WC Docket Nos. 10-90 and 14-259; Report 3025]


Petition for Reconsideration of Action in a Rulemaking Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A Petition for Reconsideration (Petition) has been filed in 
the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding by Harold Mordkofsky, on behalf 
of Halstad Telephone Company.

DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must be filed on or before August 
24, 2015. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before September 
1, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexander Minard, Telecommunications 
Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-7400, 
email: [email protected], TTY (202) 418-0484.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of Commission's document,

[[Page 47449]]

Report No. 3025, released July 20, 2015. The full text of Report No. 
3025 is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th 
Street SW., Washington, DC or may be accessed online via the 
Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System at http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission will not send a copy of this document pursuant to 
the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because this 
document does not have an impact on any rules of particular 
applicability.
    Subjects: Connect America Fund; Rural Broadband Experiments, 
released by the Commission on June 15, 2015, in WC Docket Nos. 10-90 
and 14-259, and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also Sec.  
1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules.
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-19374 Filed 8-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P

47448 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 152 / Friday, August 7, 2015 / Proposed Rules

that no small or large entities presently Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Dated: July 30, 2015.
engage in such activities. Since this August 10, 1999). Wendy C. Hamnett,
SNUR will require a person who intends Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
to engage in such activity in the future Toxics.
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
to first notify EPA by submitting a Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR
Governments
SNUN, no economic impact will occur chapter I be amended as follows:
unless someone files a SNUN to pursue This proposed rule does not have
a significant new use in the future or Tribal implications because it is not PART 721—[AMENDED]
forgoes profits by avoiding or delaying expected to have any effect (i.e., there
the significant new use. Although some will be no increase or decrease in ■ 1. The authority citation for part 721
small entities may decide to conduct authority or jurisdiction) on Tribal continues to read as follows:
such activities in the future, EPA cannot governments, on the relationship Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
presently determine how many, if any, between the Federal government and 2625(c).
there may be. However, EPA’s the Indian tribes, or on the distribution ■ 2. Add § 721.10851 to subpart E to
experience to date is that, in response to of power and responsibilities between read as follows:
the promulgation of SNURs covering the Federal government and Indian
over 1,000 chemical substances, the tribes. Thus, Executive Order 13175 (65 § 721.10851 Trichloroethylene.
Agency receives only a handful of FR 67249, November 9, 2000) does not (a) Chemical substance and
notices per year. During the six year apply to this action. significant new uses subject to reporting.
period from 2005–2010, only three (1) The chemical substance
submitters self-identified as small in G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of trichloroethylene (CAS 79–01–6) is
their SNUN submission (Ref. 2). EPA Children from Environmental Health subject to reporting under this section
believes the cost of submitting a SNUN Risks and Safety Risks for the significant new use described in
is relatively small compared to the cost This action is not subject to Executive paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
of developing and marketing a chemical (2) Manufacture or processing for use
Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
new to a firm or marketing a new use in a consumer product except for use in
1997), because this action is not
of the chemical and that the cleaners and solvent degreasers, film
intended to address environmental
requirement to submit a SNUN cleaners, hoof polishes, lubricants,
health or safety risks for children.
generally does not have a significant mirror edge sealants, and pepper spray.
economic impact. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions (b) [Reserved]
Therefore, EPA believes that the Concerning Regulations That [FR Doc. 2015–19348 Filed 8–6–15; 8:45 am]
potential economic impact of complying Significantly Affect Energy Supply, BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
with this proposed SNUR is not Distribution, or Use
expected to be significant or adversely
This proposed rule is not subject to
impact a substantial number of small FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355,
entities. In a SNUR that published as a COMMISSION
May 22, 2001), because this action is not
final rule on August 8, 1997 (62 FR
expected to affect energy supply,
42690) (FRL–5735–4), the Agency 47 CFR Part 54
distribution, or use.
presented its general determination that [WC Docket Nos. 10–90 and 14–259; Report
proposed and final SNURs are not I. National Technology Transfer and 3025]
expected to have a significant economic Advancement Act (NTTAA)
impact on a substantial number of small Petition for Reconsideration of Action
entities, which was provided to the Since this action does not involve any in a Rulemaking Proceeding
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small technical standards, section 12(d) of
Business Administration. NTTAA, 15 U.S.C. 272 note, does not AGENCY: Federal Communications
apply to this action. Commission.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act ACTION: Petition for reconsideration.
(UMRA) J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental SUMMARY: A Petition for Reconsideration
Based on EPA’s experience with Justice in Minority Populations and (Petition) has been filed in the
proposing and finalizing SNURs, State, Low-Income Populations Commission’s Rulemaking proceeding
local, and Tribal governments have not by Harold Mordkofsky, on behalf of
been impacted by these rulemakings, This proposed rule does not invoke
special consideration of environmental Halstad Telephone Company.
and EPA does not have any reason to
justice related issues as delineated by DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must
believe that any State, local, or Tribal
government would be impacted by this Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, be filed on or before August 24, 2015.
rulemaking. As such, the requirements February 16, 1994), because EPA has Replies to an opposition must be filed
of sections 202, 203, 204, or 205 of determined that this action will not on or before September 1, 2015.
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, do not have disproportionately high and ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
apply to this action. adverse human health or environmental Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
effects on minority or low-income Washington, DC 20554.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

populations. This action does not affect FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This action will not have a substantial the level of protection provided to Alexander Minard, Telecommunications
direct effect on States, on the human health or the environment. Access Policy Division, Wireline
relationship between the national List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721 Competition Bureau, (202) 418–7400,
government and the States, or on the email: Alexander.Minard@fcc.gov, TTY
distribution of power and Environmental protection, Chemicals, (202) 418–0484.
responsibilities among the various Hazardous substances, Reporting and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
levels of government, as specified in recordkeeping requirements. summary of Commission’s document,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:22 Aug 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07AUP1.SGM 07AUP1

$Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 152 / Friday, August 7, 2015 / Proposed Rules 47449 Report No. 3025, released July 20, 2015. pursuant to the Congressional Review See also § 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s The full text of Report No. 3025 is Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because this rules. available for viewing and copying in document does not have an impact on Number of Petitions Filed: 1. Room CY–B402, 445 12th Street SW., any rules of particular applicability. Federal Communications Commission. Washington, DC or may be accessed Subjects: Connect America Fund; online via the Commission’s Electronic Rural Broadband Experiments, released Marlene H. Dortch, Comment Filing System at http:// by the Commission on June 15, 2015, in Secretary. apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission will WC Docket Nos. 10–90 and 14–259, and [FR Doc. 2015–19374 Filed 8–6–15; 8:45 am] not send a copy of this document published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). BILLING CODE 6712–01–P rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:22 Aug 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\07AUP1.SGM 07AUP1$

Document Created: 2015-12-15 10:56:44
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 10:56:44

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Petition for reconsideration.
Dates		Oppositions to the Petition must be filed on or before August 24, 2015. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before September 1, 2015.
Contact		Alexander Minard, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-7400, email: [email protected], TTY (202) 418-0484.
FR Citation		80 FR 47448