80 FR 47467 - Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 152 (August 7, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 152 (August 7, 2015)
| Page Range | 47467-47469 | |
| FR Document | 2015-19481 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 152 (Friday, August 7, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 47467-47469] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-19481] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-475-818] Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain pasta (pasta) from Italy,\1\ covering the period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. The initiation of the instant review \2\ covered six companies, and we have partially rescinded the review with respect to two companies, as discussed below.\3\ Thus, this review covers four companies: The mandatory respondents, La Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana) and [[Page 47468]] Rummo S.p.A. Molino e Pastificio (the Rummo Group),\4\ and Pastificio Andalini S.p.A. (Andalini) and Delverde Industrie Alimentari S.p.A. (Delverde), which were not selected for individual examination. We preliminarily determine that La Molisana and the Rummo Group made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Italy, 61 FR 38547 (July 24, 1996). \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 51548 (August 29, 2014) (Initiation Notice). \3\ See Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 80 FR 4541 (January 28, 2015) (Partial Rescission). \4\ The Rummo Group consists of Rummo S.p.A., Lenta Lavorazione, Pasta Castiglioni, and Rummo S.p.A. Molino e Pastificio. In this review, we found that the facts have not changed with respect to Rummo and its affiliates and therefore, we followed the same methodology as we did in the most recent completed review (AR 17) by collapsing the affiliated companies as the Rummo Group. See Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Final Results of 17th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 8604 (February 18, 2015) (AR 17 Final Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective date: August 7, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang or George McMahon, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1168 or (202) 482-1167, respectively. Scope of the Order Imports covered by the order are shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta. The merchandise subject to review is currently classifiable under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Pasta from Italy; 2013-2014'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission of the 2013-2014 Administrative Review On October 10, 2014, and November 25, 2014, respectively, Dalla Costa Alimentare srl (Dalla Costa) and Pasta Lensi S.r.l. (Pasta Lensi) timely withdrew their requests for an administrative review.\6\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),\7\ and consistent with our practice,\8\ we rescinded this review, in part, with respect to Dalla Costa and Pasta Lensi.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Letter from Dalla Costa to the Department, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Pasta from Italy: Withdrawal of Review Request for Administrative Review of Dalla Costa Alimentare SRL,'' dated October 10, 2014; Letter from Pasta Lensi to the Department, ``Pasta from Italy: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated November 25, 2014. \7\ Under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an administrative review ``if a party that requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review.'' The instant review was initiated on August 29, 2014. Therefore, the deadline to withdraw review requests was November 27, 2014. Thus, the Dalla Costa and Pasta Lensi withdrawal requests are timely. \8\ See, e.g., Brass Sheet and Strip from Germany: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 49170 (August 20, 2008); see also Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 21781 (May 11, 2009). \9\ See Partial Rescission. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price or export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum dated concurrently with this notice and hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the following weighted-average dumping margins\10\ for the period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ The rate applied to the non-selected companies is a weighted-average percentage margin calculated based on the publicly- ranged U.S. volumes of the two reviewed companies with an affirmative dumping margin, for the period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. See Memorandum to the File, titled, ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Margin for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination,'' from Joy Zhang and George McMahon, Case Analysts, through Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, dated concurrently with this notice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer and/or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ La Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana)..................... 12.90 Rummo S.p.A., Lenta Lavorazione, Pasta Castiglioni, 1.18 and Rummo S.p.A. Molino e Pastificio (collectively, the Rummo Group).................................... Pastificio Andalini S.p.A. (Andalini)................ 8.91 Delverde Industrie Alimentari S.p.A. (Delverde)...... 8.91 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rate Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. If the weighted-average dumping margin for La Molisana or the Rummo Group is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in [[Page 47469]] the final results of this review is not zero or de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review where applicable. In accordance with the Department's ``automatic assessment'' practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which they did not know that their merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company- specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all- others rate established in the antidumping investigation as modified by the section 129 determination.\11\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in US-- Zeroing (EC): Notice of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose to parties to this proceeding the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results.\12\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\13\ Parties who submit comments are requested to submit: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system within 30 days of publication of this notice.\14\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined.\15\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \15\ See 19 CFR 351.310. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, the Department will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their case briefs, within 120 days after issuance of these preliminary results. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and increase the subsequent assessment of the antidumping duties by the amount of antidumping duties reimbursed. These preliminary results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: July 31, 2015. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Discussion of Methodology Date of Sale Comparisons to Normal Value Product Comparisons Determination of Comparison Method Results of the Differential Pricing (DP) Analysis Export Price Constructed Export Price Normal Value A. Home Market Viability B. Level of Trade C. Cost of Production D. Calculation of Cost of Production E. Test of Home Market Prices F. Results of the COP Test Margins for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination Currency Conversion 5. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-19481 Filed 8-6-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 152 / Friday, August 7, 2015 / Notices 47467
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE any respondent interested party. As a to lead to continuation or recurrence of
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) dumping at weighted average margins
International Trade Administration of the Act and 19 CFR up to 58.00 percent.
[A–570–002] 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
Notification Regarding Administrative
conducted an expedited sunset review
of the Order. Protective Orders
Chloropicrin From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of the This notice also serves as the only
Scope of the Order
Expedited Sunset Review of the reminder to parties subject to
Antidumping Duty Order The merchandise subject to the administrative protective order
antidumping duty order is chloropicrin, (‘‘APO’’’) of their responsibility
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, also known as trichloronitromethane. A concerning the return or destruction of
International Trade Administration, major use of the product is as a pre- proprietary information disclosed under
Department of Commerce. plant soil fumigant (pesticide). Such APO in accordance with 19 CFR
SUMMARY: On April 1, 2015, the merchandise is currently classifiable 351.305. Timely notification of the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the under Harmonized Tariff Schedule return or destruction of APO materials
Department’’) initiated a sunset review (‘‘HTS’’) item number 2904.90.50.05.3 or conversion to judicial protective
of the antidumping duty order on The HTS item number is provided for order is hereby requested. Failure to
chloropicrin from the People’s Republic convenience and customs purposes. The comply with the regulations and terms
of China (‘‘PRC’’) 1 pursuant to section written description remains dispositive. of an APO is a violation which is subject
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Analysis of Comments Received to sanction.
amended (‘‘the Act’’). Based on the We are issuing and publishing these
notice of intent to participate and All issues raised in this sunset review results and notice in accordance with
adequate response filed by the domestic are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
interested parties, and the lack of Decision Memorandum for the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
response from any respondent Expedited Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Dated: July 29, 2015.
interested party, the Department
Chloropicrin from the People’s Republic Paul Piquado,
conducted an expedited sunset review
of the Order pursuant. As a result of this of China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Compliance.
sunset review, the Department finds that
revocation of the Order would likely and Countervailing Duty Operations, to [FR Doc. 2015–19480 Filed 8–6–15; 8:45 am]
lead to continuation or recurrence of Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for BILLING CODE P
dumping, at the levels indicated in the Enforcement and Compliance, dated
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’’ concurrently with, and hereby adopted
section of this notice. by, this notice (‘‘Decision DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Memorandum’’). The issues discussed
DATES: Effective date: August 7, 2015. International Trade Administration
in the Decision Memorandum include
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the likelihood of continuation or
Howard Smith, AD/CVD Operations, [A–475–818]
recurrence of dumping and the
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, magnitude of the margins likely to Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary
International Trade Administration, prevail if the Order were to be revoked. Results of Antidumping Duty
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Parties may find a complete discussion Administrative Review; 2013–2014
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., of all issues raised in the review and the
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) corresponding recommendations in this AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
482–5193. public memorandum which is on file International Trade Administration,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: electronically via Enforcement and Department of Commerce.
Compliance’s Antidumping and SUMMARY: In response to requests from
Background interested parties, the Department of
Countervailing Duty Centralized
On April 1, 2015, the Department Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’). Commerce (the Department) is
initiated a sunset review of the order on ACCESS is available to registered users conducting an administrative review of
chloropicrin from the PRC pursuant to at http://access.trade.gov and is the antidumping duty order on certain
section 751(c) of the Act.2 On April 15, available to all parties in the Central pasta (pasta) from Italy,1 covering the
2015, the Department received a timely Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main period July 1, 2013, through June 30,
notice of intent to participate in the Department of Commerce building. In 2014. The initiation of the instant
sunset review from Ashta Chemicals, addition, a complete version of the review 2 covered six companies, and we
Inc. (‘‘Ashta’’), Niklor Chemical Decision Memorandum is available have partially rescinded the review with
Company, Inc. (‘‘Niklor’’), and Trinity directly on the Web at http:// respect to two companies, as discussed
Manufacturing, Inc. (‘‘Trinity’’), enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. below.3 Thus, this review covers four
domestic interested parties, pursuant to The signed Decision Memorandum and companies: The mandatory respondents,
19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). On May 1, the electronic versions of the Decision La Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana) and
2015, Ashta, Niklor, and Trinity filed a Memorandum are identical in content.
timely substantive response with the 1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and
Department pursuant to 19 CFR Final Results of Sunset Review Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Pursuant to Section 752(c)(3) of the Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Italy, 61 FR
351.218(d)(3)(i) . The Department did
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
38547 (July 24, 1996).
not receive a substantive response from Act, the Department determines that 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
revocation of the Order would be likely Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
1 See Antidumping Duty Order; Chloropicrin from 51548 (August 29, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
the People’s Republic of China, 49 FR 10691 (March 3 In 2004, a new HTS category was developed and 3 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of Partial
22, 1984) (‘‘Order’’). identified specifically for imports of chloropicrin, Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
2 See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80 i.e., 2904.90.50.05. Previously, the HTS category Review, 80 FR 4541 (January 28, 2015) (Partial
FR 17388 (April 1, 2015). that included chloropicrin was 2904.90.50. Rescission).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:24 Aug 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 07AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_47619/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 152 / Friday, August 7, 2015 / Notices 47469
the final results of this review is not determination.11 These cash deposit responsibility under 19 CFR
zero or de minimis. Where either the requirements, when imposed, shall 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
respondent’s weighted-average dumping remain in effect until further notice. regarding the reimbursement of
margin is zero or de minimis, or an antidumping duties prior to liquidation
Disclosure and Public Comment
importer-specific assessment rate is zero of the relevant entries during this
or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to The Department will disclose to review period. Failure to comply with
liquidate the appropriate entries parties to this proceeding the this requirement could result in the
without regard to antidumping duties. calculations performed in reaching the Secretary’s presumption that
The final results of this review shall be preliminary results within five days of reimbursement of antidumping duties
the basis for the assessment of the date of publication of these occurred and increase the subsequent
antidumping duties on entries of preliminary results.12 Pursuant to 19 assessment of the antidumping duties
merchandise covered by the final results CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may by the amount of antidumping duties
of this review where applicable. submit cases briefs not later than 30 reimbursed.
days after the date of publication of this These preliminary results of review
In accordance with the Department’s notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for are issued and published in accordance
raised in the case briefs, may be filed with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
entries of subject merchandise during not later than five days after the date for
the POR produced by each respondent the Act.
filing case briefs.13 Parties who submit
for which they did not know that their comments are requested to submit: (1) A Dated: July 31, 2015.
merchandise was destined for the statement of the issue; (2) a brief Ronald K. Lorentzen,
United States, we will instruct CBP to summary of the argument; and (3) a Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all- table of authorities. All briefs must be and Compliance.
others rate if there is no rate for the filed electronically using ACCESS. An Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
intermediate company(ies) involved in electronically filed document must be the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
the transaction. For a full discussion of received successfully in its entirety by
this clarification, see Antidumping and the Department’s electronic records 1. Summary
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: system, ACCESS. 2. Background
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 Interested parties who wish to request 3. Scope of the Order
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). a hearing must submit a written request 4. Discussion of Methodology
to the Assistant Secretary for Date of Sale
We intend to issue instructions to
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Comparisons to Normal Value
CBP 15 days after publication of the
Department of Commerce, using Product Comparisons
final results of this review.
Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS Determination of Comparison Method
Cash Deposit Requirements system within 30 days of publication of Results of the Differential Pricing (DP)
this notice.14 Requests should contain Analysis
The following cash deposit the party’s name, address, and Export Price
requirements will be effective upon telephone number, the number of Constructed Export Price
publication of the notice of final results participants, and a list of the issues to Normal Value
of administrative review for all be discussed. If a request for a hearing A. Home Market Viability
shipments of subject merchandise is made, we will inform parties of the B. Level of Trade
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, scheduled date for the hearing which C. Cost of Production
for consumption on or after the will be held at the U.S. Department of D. Calculation of Cost of Production
publication of the final results of this Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution E. Test of Home Market Prices
administrative review, as provided by Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at F. Results of the COP Test
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash a time and location to be determined.15 Margins for Companies Not Selected
deposit rate for respondents noted above Parties should confirm by telephone the for Individual Examination
will be the rate established in the final date, time, and location of the hearing. Currency Conversion
results of this administrative review; (2) Unless the deadline is extended 5. Recommendation
for merchandise exported by pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of [FR Doc. 2015–19481 Filed 8–6–15; 8:45 am]
manufacturers or exporters not covered the Act, the Department will issue the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
in this administrative review but final results of this administrative
covered in a prior segment of the review, including the results of our
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will analysis of the issues raised by the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
continue to be the company-specific rate parties in their case briefs, within 120
published for the most recently days after issuance of these preliminary International Trade Administration
completed segment of this proceeding; results.
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered [A–570–827]
in this review, a prior review, or the Notification to Importers
Cased Pencils From the People’s
original investigation, but the This notice serves as a preliminary
Republic of China: Initiation of
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate reminder to importers of their
Antidumping Duty New Shipper
will be the rate established for the most Review
11 See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO
recently completed segment of this
Panel in US—Zeroing (EC): Notice of
proceeding for the manufacturer of the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial International Trade Administration,
deposit rate for all other manufacturers Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, Department of Commerce.
or exporters will continue to be 15.45 72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007).
12 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). SUMMARY: On May 29, 2015, the
percent, the all-others rate established 13 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). Department of Commerce (the
in the antidumping investigation as 14 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Department) received a timely request
modified by the section 129 15 See 19 CFR 351.310. for a new shipper review (NSR) from
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:24 Aug 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 07AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_47619/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 10:57:04
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 10:57:04
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Joy Zhang or George McMahon, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1168 or (202) 482-1167, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 47467 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR