80 FR 47980 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 153 (August 10, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 153 (August 10, 2015)
| Page Range | 47980-47982 | |
| FR Document | 2015-19540 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 153 (Monday, August 10, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 47980-47982] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-19540] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-75603; File No. SR-MIAX-2015-49] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule August 4, 2015. Pursuant to the provisions of section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on July 30, 2015, Miami International Securities Exchange LLC (``MIAX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend the MIAX Options Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://www.miaxoptions.com/filter/wotitle/rule_filing, at MIAX's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. [[Page 47981]] A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to adopt transaction fees for Qualified Contingent Cross (``QCC'') transactions. A QCC Order is comprised of an order to buy or sell at least 1,000 contracts (or 10,000 mini-option contracts) that is identified as being part of a qualified contingent trade, coupled with a contra side order to buy or sell an equal number of contracts. The Exchange is proposing to establish fees for QCC Orders to coincide with the acceptance of QCC Orders on the Exchange beginning August 1, 2015. The proposed fees are based on the substantially similar fees of another competing options exchange.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75321 (June 29, 2015), 80 FR 38489 (July 6, 2015) (SR-CBOE-2015-059). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes to establish a transaction fee for all non- Priority Customer \4\ QCC Orders of $0.15 per contract side (Priority Customer orders will not be assessed a charge). In addition, the Exchange proposes to adopt a $0.10 per contract credit for the initiating order side, regardless of origin code. The Exchange proposes to explicitly provide in the Fee Schedule that the credit will be paid to the Member that enters the order into the System, but will only be paid on the initiating side of the QCC transaction. However, no rebates will be paid for QCC transactions in which both the initiator and contra-side orders are Priority Customers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ The term ``Priority Customer'' means a person or entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) does not place more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial accounts(s). See Exchange Rule 100. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additionally, the Exchange proposes to state explicitly in the Fee Schedule that a QCC transaction is comprised of an `initiating order' to buy (sell) at least 1,000 contracts or 10,000 mini-option contracts, coupled with a contra-side order to sell (buy) an equal number of contracts.\5\ The Exchange notes that with regard to order entry, the first order submitted into the system is marked as the initiating side and the second order is marked as the contra side --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Exchange Rule 516(j). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The purpose of these changes is to incentivize the sending of QCC Orders to the Exchange. The Exchange notes that other competing exchanges similarly provide rebates on QCC initiating orders.\6\ The Exchange also notes that QCC orders comprised of mini-contracts will be assessed QCC fees and afforded rebates equal to 10% of the fees and rebates applicable to QCC Orders comprised of standard option contracts. The Exchange is also proposing to amend Section 1(b) of the Fee Schedule to reflect that MIAX will not assess a Marketing Fee \7\ for contracts executed as a QCC, and will not assess the additional Posted Liquidity Marketing Fee \8\ to Market Makers for contracts executed as QCC Orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Chicago Board Options Exchange, Fees Schedule; International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'') Schedule of Fees. \7\ MIAX assesses a Marketing Fee to all Market Makers for contracts, including mini options, they execute in their assigned classes when the contra-party to the execution is a Priority Customer. See Fee Schedule section 1(b). \8\ MIAX assesses an additional $0.12 per contract Posted Liquidity Marketing Fee to all Market Makers for any standard options overlying EEM, GLD, IWM, QQQ, and SPY that Market Makers execute in their assigned class when the contra-party to the execution is a Priority Customer and the Priority Customer order was posted on the MIAX Book at the time of the execution. Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Exchange proposes to provide that QCC Orders are excluded from: (i) The volume threshold calculations for the Market Maker Sliding Scale; (ii) and the rebates and volume calculations as part of the Priority Customer Rebate Program. The Exchange believes that excluding QCC Orders from these fees and rebates is appropriate, because QCC Orders from Market Makers and Priority Customers will be subject to the specific transaction fees as described above that are tailored specifically for encouraging market participants to transact QCC Orders on the Exchange. The Exchange does not believe that it is necessary at this time to extend the favorable volume fee rates nor the rebate program to QCC Orders. The Exchange proposes to implement the proposed changes beginning August 1, 2015. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its fee schedule is consistent with section 6(b) of the Act \9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(4) of the Act \10\ in particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges among Exchange members. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes the proposed transaction fee for QCC Orders is reasonable because the proposed amount is in line with the amount assessed at other Exchanges for similar transactions.\11\ Additionally, the proposed fee would be charged to all non-Priority Customers alike. Assessing QCC rates to all market participants except Priority Customers is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because Priority Customer order flow enhances liquidity on the Exchange for the benefit of all market participants. Specifically, Priority Customer liquidity benefits all market participants by providing more trading opportunities, which attracts Market-Makers. An increase in the activity of these market participants in turn facilitates tighter spreads, which may cause an additional corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants. By exempting Priority Customer orders, the QCC transaction fees will not discourage the sending of Priority Customer orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. Fees Schedule; International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'') Schedule of Fees. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes the proposed rebate for the initiating order side of a QCC transaction is reasonable because other competing exchanges also provide a rebate on the initiating order side. Additionally, the proposed credit amount is within the range of the rebate amounts at the other competing exchanges.\12\ The Exchange believes the proposed credit is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it applies to all Members that enter the initiating order (except for when both the initiator and contra-side orders are Priority Customers) and because it is intended to incentivize the sending of more QCC Orders to the Exchange. The Exchange believes it is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to not provide a rebate for the initiating order for QCC transactions for which both the initiator and the contra-side orders are Priority Customers since Priority Customers are already incentivized by a reduced fee for submitting QCC Orders. The Exchange believes that the proposed exclusion of QCC Orders from the Market Maker Sliding Scale and the Priority Customer Rebate Program is reasonable because it enables QCC Orders from all market participants to be subject to only the specific transaction fees as described above that are tailored specifically for encouraging market participants to transact QCC Orders on the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the exclusion is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it ensures all market participants, other than Priority Customers, to be subject to the same transaction fee for QCC Orders. While Priority Customers will benefit [[Page 47982]] from a lower transaction fee rate for QCC Orders, excluding QCC Orders from the Priority Customer Rebate Program enables a more equitable and not unfairly discriminatory outcome. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange further believes that not assessing a Marketing Fee for contracts executed as a QCC, and not assessing the additional Posted Liquidity Marketing Fee to Market Makers for contracts executed as a QCC Order is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because such order types are originated from the same Member organization, thus obviating the purpose of the Marketing Fees. Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed change to the Fee Schedule specifying that QCC orders comprised of mini-contracts will be assessed QCC fees and afforded rebates equal to 10% of the fees and rebates applicable to QCC Orders comprised of standard option contracts is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it clearly and transparently describes the fees applicable to QCC Orders involving mini-contracts for all MIAX participants. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, because the proposed rule change applies to all Members. The Exchange believes this proposal will not cause an unnecessary burden on intermarket competition because the proposed changes will actually enhance the competiveness of the Exchange relative to other exchanges which offer comparable fees and rebates for QCC transactions. To the extent that the proposed changes make the Exchange a more attractive marketplace for market participants at other exchanges, such market participants are welcome to become market participants on the Exchange. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\13\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-MIAX-2015-49 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2015-49. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2015-49, and should be submitted on or before August 31, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-19540 Filed 8-7-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![47980 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 2015 / Notices
The Commission therefore believes proposed rule change, in addition to any For the Commission, by the Division of
that questions are raised as to whether other comments they may wish to Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
the proposed rule change is consistent submit about the proposed rule change. authority.26
with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) In particular, the Commission seeks Robert W. Errett,
of the Act, including whether it would comment on the statements of the Deputy Secretary.
be designed to promote just and Exchange contained in the Notice,25 and [FR Doc. 2015–19536 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am]
equitable principles of trade, and any other issues raised by the proposed BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
protect investors and the public interest. rule change.
IV. Procedure: Request for Written Comments may be submitted by any
of the following methods: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Comments
COMMISSION
The Commission requests that Electronic Comments
interested persons provide written [Release No. 34–75603; File No. SR–MIAX–
submissions of their views, data, and • Use the Commission’s Internet 2015–49]
arguments with respect to the concerns comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
identified above, as well as any others International Securities Exchange LLC;
they may have with the proposal. In • Send an email to rule-comments@
Notice of Filing and Immediate
particular, the Commission invites the sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
written views of interested persons NYSE–2015–02 on the subject line.
Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
concerning whether the proposed rule Paper Comments
change is inconsistent with Section August 4, 2015.
6(b)(5) 23 or any other provision of the • Send paper comments in triplicate Pursuant to the provisions of section
Act, or the rules and regulation to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
thereunder. Although there do not and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b-4
appear to be any issues relevant to NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
approval or disapproval which would on July 30, 2015, Miami International
All submissions should refer to File
be facilitated by an oral presentation of Securities Exchange LLC (‘‘MIAX’’ or
Number SR–NYSE–2015–02. This file
views, data, and arguments, the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
Commission will consider, pursuant to number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the and Exchange Commission
Rule 19b-4, any request for an (‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
opportunity to make an oral Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use as described in Items I, II, and III below,
presentation.24 which Items have been prepared by the
Interested persons are invited to only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s Exchange. The Commission is
submit written data, views, and publishing this notice to solicit
arguments regarding whether the Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the comments on the proposed rule change
proposed rule change should be from interested persons.
disapproved by August 31, 2015. Any submission, all subsequent
person who wishes to file a rebuttal to amendments, all written statements I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
any other person’s submission must file with respect to the proposed rule Statement of the Terms of Substance of
that rebuttal by September 14, 2015. The change that are filed with the the Proposed Rule Change
Commission asks that commenters Commission, and all written
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
address the sufficiency and merit of the communications relating to the
amend the MIAX Options Fee Schedule.
Exchange’s statements in support of the proposed rule change between the
The text of the proposed rule change
Commission and any person, other than
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
nonetheless, an ‘equity-compensation plan’’’ for those that may be withheld from the
at http://www.miaxoptions.com/filter/
purposes of the rule. Section 303A.08 also lists public in accordance with the
certain plans that would not be considered equity wotitle/rule_filing, at MIAX’s principal
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
compensation plans under its definition, for office, and at the Commission’s Public
available for Web site viewing and
example, plans that are made available to Reference Room.
shareholders generally, such as a typical dividend printing in the Commission’s Public
reinvestment plan, and plans that merely allow Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
employees, directors or other service providers to Washington, DC 20549, on official Statement of the Purpose of, and
elect to buy shares on the open market or from the
listed company for their current fair market value. business days between the hours of Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
The Commission notes that, in approving the equity 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such Change
compensation rules, it stated that the rules should filing also will be available for In its filing with the Commission, the
have the effect of safeguarding the interests of inspection and copying at the principal
shareholders, while placing certain restrictions on Exchange included statements
listed companies, and provide shareholders with office of the Exchange. All comments concerning the purpose of and basis for
greater protection from the potential dilutive effect received will be posted without change; the proposed rule change and discussed
of equity compensation plans. See Securities the Commission does not edit personal
Exchange Act Release No. 48108 (June 30, 2003), 68 any comments it received on the
FR 39995 (July 3, 2003) (SR–NYSE–2002–46 and
identifying information from proposed rule change. The text of these
SR–NASD–2002–140). submissions. You should submit only statements may be examined at the
23 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). information that you wish to make places specified in Item IV below. The
24 Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the available publicly. All submissions Exchange has prepared summaries, set
Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Pub. L. 94–29
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE– forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
(June 4, 1975), grants the Commission flexibility to
determine what type of proceeding—either oral or 2015–02 and should be submitted on or the most significant aspects of such
notice and opportunity for written comments—is before August 31, 2015. Rebuttal statements.
appropriate for consideration of a particular comments should be submitted by
proposal by a self-regulatory organization. See September 14, 2015. 26 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Senate Comm.
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No.
75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 30 (1975). 25 See Notice, supra note 3. 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:16 Aug 07, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_48133/page/1.svg)
![47982 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 2015 / Notices
from a lower transaction fee rate for proposed rule change, the Commission information that you wish to make
QCC Orders, excluding QCC Orders summarily may temporarily suspend available publicly. All submissions
from the Priority Customer Rebate such rule change if it appears to the should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–
Program enables a more equitable and Commission that such action is 2015–49, and should be submitted on or
not unfairly discriminatory outcome. necessary or appropriate in the public before August 31, 2015.
The Exchange further believes that interest, for the protection of investors, For the Commission, by the Division of
not assessing a Marketing Fee for or otherwise in furtherance of the Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
contracts executed as a QCC, and not purposes of the Act. If the Commission authority.14
assessing the additional Posted takes such action, the Commission shall Robert W. Errett,
Liquidity Marketing Fee to Market institute proceedings to determine Deputy Secretary.
Makers for contracts executed as a QCC whether the proposed rule should be
[FR Doc. 2015–19540 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am]
Order is equitable and not unfairly approved or disapproved.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
discriminatory because such order types
IV. Solicitation of Comments
are originated from the same Member
organization, thus obviating the purpose Interested persons are invited to
of the Marketing Fees. Finally, the submit written data, views, and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Exchange believes that the proposed arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule Privacy Act of 1974: System of
change to the Fee Schedule specifying
change is consistent with the Act. Records
that QCC orders comprised of mini-
contracts will be assessed QCC fees and Comments may be submitted by any of AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
afforded rebates equal to 10% of the fees the following methods: ACTION: Notice of Revision of Privacy
and rebates applicable to QCC Orders Electronic Comments Act System of Records.
comprised of standard option contracts
is equitable and not unfairly • Use the Commission’s Internet SUMMARY: SBA is amending its Privacy
discriminatory because it clearly and comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Act system of records notice titled,
transparently describes the fees rules/sro.shtml); or Business and Community Initiatives
• Send an email to rule-comments@ Resource Files, SBA–5 to clarify the
applicable to QCC Orders involving
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– categories of individuals and categories
mini-contracts for all MIAX
MIAX–2015–49 on the subject line. of records that are covered by that
participants.
Paper Comments systems of records and also to change
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s the title of the system of records.
Statement on Burden on Competition • Send paper comments in triplicate
Publication of this notice complies with
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
The Exchange does not believe that and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street the Privacy Act and the Office of
the proposed rule change will impose NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Management and Budget (OMB)
any burden on competition not Circular A–130 requirement for agencies
necessary or appropriate in furtherance All submissions should refer to File to publish a notice in the Federal
of the purposes of the Act, because the Number SR–MIAX–2015–49. This file Register whenever the agency alters a
proposed rule change applies to all number should be included on the system of records.
Members. The Exchange believes this subject line if email is used. To help the
DATES: Comment Date: Submit
proposal will not cause an unnecessary Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use comments by September 9, 2015.
burden on intermarket competition Effective Date: The changes to this
because the proposed changes will only one method. The Commission will
system of records will become effective
actually enhance the competiveness of post all comments on the Commission’s
September 24, 2015 unless comments
the Exchange relative to other exchanges Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
are received that result in further
which offer comparable fees and rebates rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
revision.
for QCC transactions. To the extent that submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
the proposed changes make the to Linda Di Giandomenico, Acting Chief
Exchange a more attractive marketplace with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts
for market participants at other Office, U. S. Small Business
exchanges, such market participants are Commission, and all written
communications relating to the Administration, 409 3rd Street SW.,
welcome to become market participants Washington, DC 20416.
on the Exchange. proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s those that may be withheld from the Linda Di Giandomenico, Acting Chief
Statement on Comments on the public in accordance with the Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts
Proposed Rule Change Received From provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Office, (202) 401–8203.
Members, Participants, or Others available for Web site viewing and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A system
Written comments were neither printing in the Commission’s Public of records (SOR) is a group of any
solicited nor received. Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., records under the control of a federal
Washington, DC 20549 on official agency from which information is
III. Date of Effectiveness of the business days between the hours of retrieved by the name of an individual
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such or by a number, symbol or other
Commission Action
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
filing also will be available for identifier assigned to the individual.
The foregoing rule change has become inspection and copying at the principal The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, requires
effective pursuant to section office of the Exchange. All comments each federal agency to publish in the
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.13 At any time received will be posted without change; Federal Register a system of records
within 60 days of the filing of the the Commission does not edit personal notice (SORN) identifying and
identifying information from
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). submissions. You should submit only 14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:16 Aug 07, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_48133/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 12:11:49
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 12:11:49
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 47980 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR