80 FR 48252 - Safety Zone; TriMet Tilikum Crossing Bridge Fireworks Display, Willamette River, Portland, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 155 (August 12, 2015)

Page Range		48252-48254
FR Document		2015-19815

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the Willamette River in the vicinity of the TriMet Tilikum Crossing Bridge in Portland, OR. This safety zone is necessary to help ensure the safety of the maritime public during a fireworks display and will do so by prohibiting unauthorized persons and vessels from entering the safety zones unless authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port or his designated representatives.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 155 (Wednesday, August 12, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 155 (Wednesday, August 12, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48252-48254]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19815]



[[Page 48252]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0510]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; TriMet Tilikum Crossing Bridge Fireworks Display, 
Willamette River, Portland, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
Willamette River in the vicinity of the TriMet Tilikum Crossing Bridge 
in Portland, OR. This safety zone is necessary to help ensure the 
safety of the maritime public during a fireworks display and will do so 
by prohibiting unauthorized persons and vessels from entering the 
safety zones unless authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of 
the Port or his designated representatives.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 p.m. until 9:30 p.m. on August 
22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket 
[USCG-2015-0510]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the 
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also 
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground 
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Ken Lawrenson, Waterways Management Division, Marine 
Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-9319, email 
[email protected]. If you have questions on viewing or submitting 
material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket 
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule. Waiting for a 30 day notice period to run 
would be impracticable. The Coast Guard did not receive the necessary 
information in time for this regulation to undertake both an NPRM prior 
to the scheduled event.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register due to the late notification of 
this event and because the event will have occurred before comments 
could have been taken. Additionally, waiting for a 30 day notice period 
to run would be impracticable as delayed promulgation may result in 
injury or damage to persons and vessels from the hazards associated 
with fireworks displays.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for this rule is: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1; which collectively authorize the Coast Guard to 
establish regulatory safety zones for safety and environmental 
purposes.
    Fireworks displays create hazardous conditions for the maritime 
public because of the large number of vessels that congregate near the 
displays, as well as the noise, falling debris, and explosions that 
occur during the event. This safety zone is necessary in order to 
reduce vessel traffic congestion in the proximity of fireworks 
discharge sites and to prevent vessel traffic within the fallout zone 
of the fireworks.

C. Discussion of the Temporary Final Rule

    This rule establishes one safety zone in the Sector Columbia River 
Captain of the Port Zone.
    The safety zone will encompass all waters, bank to bank of the 
Willamette River, in Portland, Oregon enclosed by the Marquam and Ross 
Island Bridges. This event will be held on Saturday August 22, 2015 
from 8:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The Coast Guard has made 
this determination based on the fact that the safety zone created by 
this rule will not significantly affect the maritime public because 
vessels may still coordinate their transit with the Coast Guard in the 
vicinity of the safety zone.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be 
small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to 
operate in the area covered by the safety zone. The rule will not have 
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
because the safety zones will only be in effect for a limited period of 
time. Additionally, vessels can still transit through the zone with the 
permission of the Captain of the Port. Before the effective period, we 
will publish advisories in the Local Notice to Mariners available to 
users of the river. Maritime traffic will be able to schedule their 
transits around the safety zone.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity

[[Page 48253]]

and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, 
please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 
qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically 
affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined 
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do not discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined 
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule involves the creation of one safety zone during 
fireworks displays to protect maritime public. This rule is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis 
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion 
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is 
amending 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-510 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T13-510  Safety Zone; TriMet Tilikum Crossing Bridge. 
Fireworks Display, Willamette River, Portland, OR.

    (a) Safety Zones. The following area is a designated safety zone:
    (1) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters, bank to 
bank of the Willamette River, in Portland, Oregon enclosed by the 
Marquam and Ross Island Bridges.
    (2) Enforcement Period. This event will be held on Saturday August 
22, 2015 from 8:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33 
CFR part 165, subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety 
zone created in this section or bring, cause to be brought, or allow to 
remain in the safety zone created in this section any vehicle, vessel, 
or object unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his 
designated

[[Page 48254]]

representative. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by other 
Federal, State, or local agencies with the enforcement of the safety 
zone.
    (c) Authorization. All vessel operators who desire to enter the 
safety zone must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port or 
Designated Representative by contacting either the on-scene patrol 
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the Coast Guard Sector Columbia River 
Command Center via telephone at (503) 861-6211.
    (d) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative 
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has 
been authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port to 
assist in enforcing the security zones described in paragraph (a) of 
this section.

    Dated: June 23, 2015.
D.J. Travers,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2015-19815 Filed 8-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 155 / Wednesday, August 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 48253

and that this rule would have a 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Management Directive 023–01 and
significant economic impact on it, The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
please submit a comment (see of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires which guide the Coast Guard in
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it Federal agencies to assess the effects of complying with the National
qualifies and how and to what degree their discretionary regulatory actions. In Environmental Policy Act of 1969
this rule would economically affect it. particular, the Act addresses actions (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
that may result in the expenditure by a have determined that this action is one
3. Assistance for Small Entities
State, local, or tribal government, in the of a category of actions that do not
Under section 213(a) of the Small aggregate, or by the private sector of individually or cumulatively have a
Business Regulatory Enforcement $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or significant effect on the human
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), more in any one year. Though this rule environment. This rule involves the
we want to assist small entities in will not result in such expenditure, we creation of one safety zone during
understanding this rule. If the rule do not discuss the effects of this rule fireworks displays to protect maritime
would affect your small business, elsewhere in this preamble. public. This rule is categorically
organization, or governmental excluded from further review under
jurisdiction and you have questions 8. Taking of Private Property paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
concerning its provisions or options for This rule will not cause a taking of Commandant Instruction. An
compliance, please contact the person private property or otherwise have environmental analysis checklist
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION taking implications under Executive supporting this determination and a
CONTACT, above. Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Categorical Exclusion Determination are
Small businesses may send comments Interference with Constitutionally available in the docket where indicated
on the actions of Federal employees Protected Property Rights. under ADDRESSES. We seek any
who enforce, or otherwise determine comments or information that may lead
9. Civil Justice Reform to the discovery of a significant
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture This rule meets applicable standards environmental impact from this rule.
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
and the Regional Small Business Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The minimize litigation, eliminate Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
Ombudsman evaluates these actions ambiguity, and reduce burden. (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
annually and rates each agency’s requirements, Security measures,
10. Protection of Children Waterways.
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by We have analyzed this rule under For the reasons discussed in the
employees of the Coast Guard, call Executive Order 13045, Protection of preamble, the Coast Guard is amending
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). Children from Environmental Health 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
The Coast Guard will not retaliate Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
against small entities that question or an economically significant rule and PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
complain about this rule or any policy does not create an environmental risk to AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
or action of the Coast Guard. health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
4. Collection of Information continues to read as follows:
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule will not call for a new Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
This rule does not have tribal 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
collection of information under the Department of Homeland Security Delegation
implications under Executive Order
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 No. 0170.1.
13175, Consultation and Coordination
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
with Indian Tribal Governments, ■ 2. Add § 165.T13–510 to read as
5. Federalism because it does not have a substantial follows:
direct effect on one or more Indian
A rule has implications for federalism § 165.T13–510 Safety Zone; TriMet Tilikum
tribes, on the relationship between the
under Executive Order 13132, Crossing Bridge. Fireworks Display,
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Willamette River, Portland, OR.
or on the distribution of power and
effect on the States, on the relationship (a) Safety Zones. The following area is
responsibilities between the Federal
between the national government and a designated safety zone:
Government and Indian tribes.
the States, or on the distribution of (1) Location. The safety zone will
power and responsibilities among the 12. Energy Effects encompass all waters, bank to bank of
various levels of government. We have This action is not a ‘‘significant the Willamette River, in Portland,
analyzed this rule under that Order and energy action’’ under Executive Order Oregon enclosed by the Marquam and
determined that this rule does not have 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations Ross Island Bridges.
implications for federalism. That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, (2) Enforcement Period. This event
6. Protest Activities Distribution, or Use. will be held on Saturday August 22,
2015 from 8:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.
The Coast Guard respects the First 13. Technical Standards (b) Regulations. In accordance with
Amendment rights of protesters. This rule does not use technical the general regulations in 33 CFR part
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Protesters are asked to contact the standards. Therefore, we did not 165, subpart C, no person may enter or
person listed in the FOR FURTHER consider the use of voluntary consensus remain in the safety zone created in this
INFORMATION CONTACT section to standards. section or bring, cause to be brought, or
coordinate protest activities so that your allow to remain in the safety zone
message can be received without 14. Environment created in this section any vehicle,
jeopardizing the safety or security of We have analyzed this rule under vessel, or object unless authorized by
people, places or vessels. Department of Homeland Security the Captain of the Port or his designated

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:35 Aug 11, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12AUR1.SGM 12AUR1

48254 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 155 / Wednesday, August 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

representative. The Captain of the Port Washington, DC 20420, (202) 632–8786. term look-back often relates to the
may be assisted by other Federal, State, (This is not a toll-free number.) period preceding the date that a person
or local agencies with the enforcement SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: applies for Medicaid. VA does not
of the safety zone. believe this regulatory change has any
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators The January 29, 2015 Proposed Rule impact on veterans moving to an
who desire to enter the safety zone must On January 29, 2015, VA published a assisted living facility, staying with a
obtain permission from the Captain of proposed rule in the Federal Register at caregiver, or relying on Medicaid, as the
the Port or Designated Representative by 80 FR 4812, to revise VA’s regulations commenter stated. Instead, this change
contacting either the on-scene patrol governing adjustable rate mortgages set helps ensure VA alignment with other
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the forth at 38 CFR 36.4312(d). VA Federal laws and current lender
Coast Guard Sector Columbia River proposed two amendments in this practices with regard to adjustable rate
Command Center via telephone at (503) rulemaking to ensure VA regulations mortgages. See 80 FR 4814. It provides
861–6211. remain aligned with TILA and the veteran borrowers who have adjustable
(d) Definitions. As used in this implementing regulations set forth by rate mortgages more advanced notice
section, designated representative the CFPB. First, VA proposed amending and detailed disclosures regarding a
means any Coast Guard commissioned, 38 CFR 36.4312(d)(6) so that the change in their interest rates, thereby
warrant, or petty officer who has been requirements for the disclosures and affording them a better opportunity to
authorized by the Sector Columbia River notifications that must be provided to respond to such changes and stay in
Captain of the Port to assist in enforcing borrowers prior to an interest-rate their homes. Therefore, VA is adopting
the security zones described in adjustment are cross-referenced to those the proposed rule without change.
paragraph (a) of this section. set forth in the TILA implementing
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
regulations at 12 CFR 1026.20(c) and
Dated: June 23, 2015. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(d). Second, VA proposed amending 38
D.J. Travers, CFR 36.4312(d)(2) to require that direct agencies to assess the costs and
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the lenders adjust interest rates based on the benefits of available regulatory
Port, Sector Columbia River. most recent interest rate index figure alternatives and, when regulation is
[FR Doc. 2015–19815 Filed 8–11–15; 8:45 am] available 45 days prior to the interest necessary, to select regulatory
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P rate adjustment, instead of the interest approaches that maximize net benefits
rate index available 30 days prior to the (including potential economic,
interest rate adjustment, as is currently environmental, public health and safety
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS required in VA’s regulations. effects, and other advantages;
AFFAIRS The public comment period for the distributive impacts; and equity).
proposed rule closed on March 30, Executive Order 13563 (Improving
38 CFR Part 36 2015. VA received two comments. The Regulation and Regulatory Review)
comments received on the proposed emphasizes the importance of
RIN 2900–AP25 rule are discussed below. VA adopts quantifying both costs and benefits,
without change the proposed rule that reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
Loan Guaranty: Adjustable Rate revises VA’s adjustable rate mortgage promoting flexibility. Executive Order
Mortgage Notification Requirements regulations at 38 CFR 36.4312(d) to 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
and Look-Back Period ensure consistency with other Federal Review) defines a ‘‘significant
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. agency regulations. regulatory action’’ requiring review by
VA received one public comment on the Office of Management and Budget
ACTION: Final rule.
the proposed rule from a lender who (OMB), unless OMB waives such
SUMMARY: This document adopts as participates in the VA Home Loan review, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is
final, without change, a proposed rule of program. The commenter expressed likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) support for the rule as written and Have an annual effect on the economy
to amend its regulations that govern stated that VA’s alignment with CFPB’s of $100 million or more or adversely
adjustable rate mortgages made in rules will reduce the regulatory burden affect in a material way the economy, a
conjunction with the Home Loan [on lenders] and ensure protection for sector of the economy, productivity,
Guaranty program. These revisions align Veterans and Servicemembers. competition, jobs, the environment,
VA’s disclosure and interest rate VA received one public comment on public health or safety, or State, local,
adjustment requirements with the the proposed rule from an individual. or tribal governments or communities;
implementing regulations of the Truth The commenter stated that a three-year (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
in Lending Act (TILA), as recently look-back period would be detrimental otherwise interfere with an action taken
revised by the Consumer Financial to veterans and their spouses. The or planned by another agency; (3)
Protection Bureau (CFPB). This commenter explained that veterans and Materially alter the budgetary impact of
rulemaking will ensure VA remains their spouses currently have a good entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
consistent with other applicable chance of moving to an assisted living programs or the rights and obligations of
consumer finance and housing facility of their choice or staying at recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
regulations governing adjustable rate home with a caregiver, but that with a legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mortgages. three-year look-back period, the mandates, the President’s priorities, or
majority of these individuals will no the principles set forth in this Executive
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is longer have that choice. The commenter Order.’’
effective September 11, 2015. explained that this would result in these The economic, interagency,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John veterans relying on Medicaid and going budgetary, legal, and policy
Bell III, Assistant Director for Loan to a facility not of their choosing, which implications of this regulatory action
Policy (262), Veterans Benefits would be more expensive. have been examined, and it has been
Administration, Department of Veterans VA believes the commenter mistook determined not to be a significant
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW., the purpose of VA’s proposal, as the regulatory action under Executive Order

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:35 Aug 11, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12AUR1.SGM 12AUR1

Document Created: 2016-09-27 22:27:21
Document Modified: 2016-09-27 22:27:21

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 8:30 p.m. until 9:30 p.m. on August 22, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Ken Lawrenson, Waterways Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-9319, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 48252
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 48252 - Safety Zone; TriMet Tilikum Crossing Bridge Fireworks Display, Willamette River, Portland, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 155 (August 12, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard