80 FR 48784 - Safety Zone; Ironman 70.3 Miami; Miami, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 157 (August 14, 2015)

Page Range		48784-48787
FR Document		2015-20111

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the waters of Biscayne Bay, east of Bayfront Park, in Miami, Florida during the 2015 Ironman 70.3 Miami, a triathlon. The Ironman 70.3 Miami is scheduled to take place on October 25, 2015. Approximately 2,500 participants are anticipated to participate in the swim portion of the event. No spectators are expected to be present during the event. The safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of the participants, participant vessels, and the general public during the event. Persons and vessels, except those participating in the event, are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Miami or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 157 (Friday, August 14, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 157 (Friday, August 14, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48784-48787]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0483]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Ironman 70.3 Miami; Miami, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the 
waters of Biscayne Bay, east of Bayfront Park, in Miami, Florida during 
the 2015 Ironman 70.3 Miami, a triathlon. The Ironman 70.3 Miami is 
scheduled to take place on October 25, 2015. Approximately 2,500 
participants are anticipated to participate in the swim portion of the 
event. No spectators are expected to be present during the event. The 
safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of the participants, 
participant vessels, and the general public during the event.

[[Page 48785]]

Persons and vessels, except those participating in the event, are 
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or 
remaining within the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of 
the Port Miami or a designated representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before September 28, 2015.
    Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on 
or before September 14, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using 
any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. 
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries 
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion 
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions 
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of 
these three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Petty Officer John K. Jennings, Sector Miami Prevention 
Department, Coast Guard; telephone (305) 535-4317, email 
John.K.Jennings@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or 
submitting material to the docket, call Rich Walter, Program Manager, 
Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at 
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but 
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it 
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully 
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, 
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when 
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you 
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a 
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact 
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number USCG-2015-XXXX in the ``SEARCH'' box and click 
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with 
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them 
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would 
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and 
material received during the comment period and may change the rule 
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number (USCG-2015-XXXX) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click 
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with 
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in 
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation 
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any 
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or 
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice 
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a 
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES. 
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If 
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a 
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    Previously, a rule regarding this maritime event was published in 
the Code of Federal Regulations at 33 CFR 165. No final rule has been 
published in regards to this event.

C. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to 
establish regulated navigation areas and other limited access areas: 33 
U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195 33 
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; 
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. The purpose of 
the rule is to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters of 
the United States during the Ironman 70.3 Miami.

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    On October 25, 2015, Miami Tri Events is sponsoring the Ironman 
70.3, a triathlon. The swim portion of the event will be held on the 
waters of Biscayne Bay, Miami, Florida. Approximately 2,500 
participants are anticipated to participate in the event. No spectator 
vessels are expected during the event.
    The proposed rule will establish a safety zone that will encompass 
certain waters of Biscayne Bay located east of Bay Front Park, Miami, 
Florida. The safety zone will be enforced from 6 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. 
on October 25, 2015. The safety zone will establish an area around the 
event where non-participant persons and vessels are prohibited from 
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within. Non-
participant persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, 
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone by 
contacting the Captain of the Port Miami by telephone at 305-535-4472, 
or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If 
authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within 
the event area is granted by the Captain of the Port

[[Page 48786]]

Miami or a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving 
such authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of 
the Port Miami or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will 
provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners, 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The economic impact of 
this proposed rule is not significant for the following reasons: (1) 
The safety zone will be enforced for only four and one half hours; (2) 
although non-participant persons and vessels will not be able to enter, 
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the event area without 
authorization from the Captain of the Port Miami or a designated 
representative, they may operate in the surrounding area during the 
enforcement period; (3) non-participant persons and vessels may still 
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the event area 
during the enforcement period if authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Miami or a designated representative; and (4) the Coast Guard will 
provide advance notification of the safety zone to the local maritime 
community by Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The 
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be 
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to enter, 
transit through, anchor in, or remain within that portion of Biscayne 
Bay encompassed within the safety zone from 3 p.m. until 6 p.m. on 
April 18, 2015. For the reasons discussed in the Regulatory Planning 
and Review section above, this rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any 
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045, 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not 
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under 
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we 
did

[[Page 48787]]

not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a 
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule 
involves the creation of a safety zone. This rule is categorically 
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the 
Commandant Instruction. Preliminary environmental analysis checklists 
supporting this determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
proposed rule.

 List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  165.T07-0024 to the undesignated center 
heading Seventh Coast Guard District to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T07-0679  Safety Zone; Ironman 70.3 Miami, Biscayne Bay; 
Miami, FL.

    (a) Regulated area. The following regulated area is a safety zone. 
All waters of Biscayne Bay located east of Bayfront Park and 
encompassed within the following points: Starting at Point 1 in 
position 25[deg]46'44'' N., 080[deg]10'59'' W.; thence southeast to 
Point 2 in position 25[deg]46'24'' N., 080[deg]10'44'' W.; thence 
southwest to Point 3 in position 25[deg]46'18'' N., 080[deg]11'05'' W.; 
thence north to Point 4 in position 25[deg]46'33'' N., 080[deg]11'05'' 
W.; thence northeast back to origin. All coordinates are North American 
Datum 1983.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast 
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty 
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and 
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the 
Captain of the Port Miami in the enforcement of the regulated area.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Non-participant persons and vessels are 
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or 
remaining within the regulated area unless authorized by Captain of the 
Port Miami or a designated representative.
    (2) Non-participant persons and vessels may request authorization 
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated 
area by contacting the Captain of the Port Miami by telephone at 305-
535-4472, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. 
If authorization is granted by the Captain of the Port Miami or a 
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such 
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the 
Port Miami or a designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the safety zone by Local 
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners and on-scene 
designated representatives.
    (d) Effective date. This rule will be enforced from 6 a.m. until 
10:30 a.m. on October 25, 2015.

    Dated: July 30, 2015.
A.J. Gould,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Miami.
[FR Doc. 2015-20111 Filed 8-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

48784 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules

8. Taking of Private Property similar in all aspects to this year’s (c) Regulations. (1) All non-
This proposed rule would not cause a regulation; therefore, the same participant persons and vessels are
taking of private property or otherwise Categorical Exclusion Determination is prohibited from entering, transiting
have taking implications under being referenced for this year’s through, anchoring in or remaining
Executive Order 12630, Governmental regulation. The Categorical Exclusion within the regulated area unless
Actions and Interference with Determination is available in the docket authorized by the Captain of the Port
Constitutionally Protected Property folder for USCG–2013–0688 at Miami or a designated representative.
Rights. www.regulations.gov. This proposed (2) Non-participant persons and
rule involves establishing a safety zone vessels desiring to enter, transit through,
9. Civil Justice Reform that will be enforced from 6:30 a.m. anchor in, or remain within a regulated
This proposed rule meets applicable until 11 a.m. on September 20, 2015. area may contact the Captain of the Port
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of This rule is categorically excluded from Miami by telephone at 305–535–4472,
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice further review under paragraph 34(g) of or a designated representative via VHF
Reform, to minimize litigation, Figure 2–1 of the Commandant radio on channel 16. If authorization to
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce Instruction. We seek any comments or enter, transit through, anchor in, or
burden. information that may lead to the remain within a regulated area is
discovery of a significant environmental granted by the Captain of the Port
10. Protection of Children From impact from this proposed rule. Miami or a designated representative,
Environmental Health Risks all persons and vessels receiving such
We have analyzed this proposed rule F. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
authorization must comply with the
under Executive Order 13045, Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation instructions of the Captain of the Port
Protection of Children from (water), Reporting and recordkeeping Miami or a designated representative.
Environmental Health Risks and Safety requirements, Security measures, and (3) The Coast Guard will provide
Risks. This proposed rule is not an Waterways. notice of the regulated area by Local
economically significant rule and would Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
For the reasons discussed in the
not create an environmental risk to Mariners and on-scene designated
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
health or risk to safety that might representatives.
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
disproportionately affect children. (d) Effective date. This rule is
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION effective on September 20, 2015. This
11. Indian Tribal Governments rule will be enforced from 6:30 a.m.
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
This proposed rule does not have until 11 a.m. on September 20, 2015.
tribal implications under Executive ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 Dated: July 30, 2015.
Order 13175, Consultation and continues to read as follows: A.J. Gould,
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Governments, because it would not have
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Port Miami.
a substantial direct effect on one or Department of Homeland Security Delegation [FR Doc. 2015–20114 Filed 8–13–15; 8:45 am]
more Indian tribes, on the relationship No. 0170.1.
between the Federal Government and BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of ■ 2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0561 to
power and responsibilities between the the undesignated center heading
Federal Government and Indian tribes. Seventh Coast Guard District to read as DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
follows: SECURITY
12. Energy Effects
§ 165.T07–0561 Safety Zone; Mack Cycle Coast Guard
This proposed rule is not a Escape to Miami Triathlon, Biscayne Bay;
‘‘significant energy action’’ under Miami, FL. 33 CFR Part 165
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That (a) Regulated area. The following [Docket Number USCG–2015–0483]
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, regulated area is a safety zone. All
waters of Biscayne Bay, east of Margaret RIN 1625–AA00
Distribution, or Use.
Pace Park, Miami, FL encompassed
13. Technical Standards within the following points: starting at Safety Zone; Ironman 70.3 Miami;
point 1 in position 25°47′40″ N., Miami, FL
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did 80°11′07″ W.; thence north to point 2 in AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
not consider the use of voluntary position 25°48′12″ N., 80°11′07″ W.; ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
consensus standards. thence east to point 3 in position
25°48′12″ N., 80°10′30″ W.; thence south SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
14. Environment to point 4 in position 25°47′40″ N., establish a safety zone on the waters of
We have analyzed this proposed rule 80°10′30″ W.; thence west back to Biscayne Bay, east of Bayfront Park, in
under Department of Homeland origin. All coordinates are North Miami, Florida during the 2015 Ironman
Security Management Directive 023–01 American Datum 1983. 70.3 Miami, a triathlon. The Ironman
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

and Commandant Instruction (b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 70.3 Miami is scheduled to take place
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast representative’’ means Coast Guard on October 25, 2015. Approximately
Guard in complying with the National Patrol Commanders, including Coast 2,500 participants are anticipated to
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Guard coxswains, petty officers, and participate in the swim portion of the
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f). The other officers operating Coast Guard event. No spectators are expected to be
Coast Guard previously completed a vessels, and Federal, state, and local present during the event. The safety
Categorical Exclusion Determination for officers designated by or assisting the zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
this temporary safety zone in 2013. The Captain of the Port Miami in the the participants, participant vessels, and
regulation for the 2013 occurrences is enforcement of the regulated area. the general public during the event.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM 14AUP1

48786 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules

Miami or a designated representative, vessels intending to enter, transit 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
all persons and vessels receiving such through, anchor in, or remain within The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
authorization must comply with the that portion of Biscayne Bay of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
instructions of the Captain of the Port encompassed within the safety zone Federal agencies to assess the effects of
Miami or a designated representative. from 3 p.m. until 6 p.m. on April 18, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
The Coast Guard will provide notice of 2015. For the reasons discussed in the particular, the Act addresses actions
the safety zone by Local Notice to Regulatory Planning and Review section that may result in the expenditure by a
Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, above, this rule will not have a State, local, or tribal government, in the
and on-scene designated significant economic impact on a aggregate, or by the private sector of
representatives. substantial number of small entities. $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
E. Regulatory Analyses If you think that your business, more in any one year. Though this
organization, or governmental proposed rule would not result in such
We developed this proposed rule after jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
considering numerous statutes and an expenditure, we do discuss the
and that this rule would have a effects of this rule elsewhere in this
executive orders related to rulemaking. significant economic impact on it,
Below we summarize our analyses preamble.
please submit a comment (see
based on a number of these statutes or ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 8. Taking of Private Property
executive orders. qualifies and how and to what degree This proposed rule would not cause a
1. Regulatory Planning and Review this rule would economically affect it. taking of private property or otherwise
This proposed rule is not a significant have taking implications under
3. Assistance for Small Entities
regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Under section 213(a) of the Small Actions and Interference with
Planning and Review, as supplemented Business Regulatory Enforcement Constitutionally Protected Property
by Executive Order 13563, Improving Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), Rights.
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and we want to assist small entities in
9. Civil Justice Reform
does not require an assessment of understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business, This proposed rule meets applicable
potential costs and benefits under
organization, or governmental standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
jurisdiction and you have questions Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
or under section 1 of Executive Order
concerning its provisions or options for Reform, to minimize litigation,
13563. The Office of Management and
compliance, please contact the person eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
Budget has not reviewed it under those
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION burden.
Orders. The economic impact of this
proposed rule is not significant for the CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will 10. Protection of Children From
following reasons: (1) The safety zone not retaliate against small entities that Environmental Health Risks
will be enforced for only four and one question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of We have analyzed this proposed rule
half hours; (2) although non-participant under Executive Order 13045,
persons and vessels will not be able to the Coast Guard.
Protection of Children from
enter, transit through, anchor in, or 4. Collection of Information Environmental Health Risks and Safety
remain within the event area without Risks. This rule is not an economically
authorization from the Captain of the This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the significant rule and would not create an
Port Miami or a designated environmental risk to health or risk to
representative, they may operate in the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520). safety that might disproportionately
surrounding area during the affect children.
enforcement period; (3) non-participant 5. Federalism
persons and vessels may still enter, 11. Indian Tribal Governments
transit through, anchor in, or remain A rule has implications for federalism This proposed rule does not have
within the event area during the under Executive Order 13132, tribal implications under Executive
enforcement period if authorized by the Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Order 13175, Consultation and
Captain of the Port Miami or a effect on the States, on the relationship Coordination with Indian Tribal
designated representative; and (4) the between the national government and Governments, because it would not have
Coast Guard will provide advance the States, or on the distribution of a substantial direct effect on one or
notification of the safety zone to the power and responsibilities among the more Indian tribes, on the relationship
local maritime community by Local various levels of government. We have between the Federal Government and
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice analyzed this proposed rule under that Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
to Mariners. Order and determined that this rule power and responsibilities between the
does not have implications for Federal Government and Indian tribes.
2. Impact on Small Entities federalism.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 12. Energy Effects
6. Protest Activities
U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered This proposed rule is not a
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

the impact of this proposed rule on The Coast Guard respects the First ‘‘significant energy action’’ under
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies Amendment rights of protesters. Executive Order 13211, Actions
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed Protesters are asked to contact the Concerning Regulations That
rule will not have a significant person listed in the FOR FURTHER Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
economic impact on a substantial INFORMATION CONTACT section to Distribution, or Use.
number of small entities. coordinate protest activities so that your
This rule may affect the following message can be received without 13. Technical Standards
entities, some of which may be small jeopardizing the safety or security of This proposed rule does not use
entities: The owners or operators of people, places or vessels. technical standards. Therefore, we did

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM 14AUP1

Document Created: 2018-02-23 10:58:45
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 10:58:45

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before September 28, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Petty Officer John K. Jennings, Sector Miami Prevention Department, Coast Guard; telephone (305) 535-4317, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Rich Walter, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 48784
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 48784 - Safety Zone; Ironman 70.3 Miami; Miami, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 157 (August 14, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard