80_FR_49333 80 FR 49175 - Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security DHS/CBP-001, Import Information System, System of Records, System of Records

80 FR 49175 - Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security DHS/CBP-001, Import Information System, System of Records, System of Records

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 158 (August 17, 2015)

Page Range49175-49177
FR Document2015-19726

The Department of Homeland Security is giving concurrent notice for the newly established ``Department of Homeland Security/CBP- 001, Import Information System, System of Records'' and this proposed rulemaking. In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the Department of Homeland Security concurrently proposes to consolidate, update, and rename two current Department of Homeland Security systems of records titled, ``Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS/CBP-001 Automated Commercial Environment/International Trade Data System System of Records'' and ``Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS/CBP-015 Automated Commercial System System of Records'' as one new system of records. The consolidated system of records notice will be titled, ``Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS/CBP-001 Import Information System System of Records.'' This system of records will continue to collect and maintain records on all commercial goods imported into the United States, as well as information pertaining to the carrier, broker, importer, and other persons associated with the manifest, import, or commercial entry transactions for the goods. In this proposed rulemaking, the Department proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 158 (Monday, August 17, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 158 (Monday, August 17, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49175-49177]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19726]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Office of the Secretary

6 CFR Part 5

[Docket No. DHS-2015-0046]


Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of 
Homeland Security DHS/CBP-001, Import Information System, System of 
Records, System of Records

AGENCY: Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is giving concurrent 
notice for the newly established ``Department of Homeland Security/CBP-
001, Import Information System, System of Records'' and this proposed 
rulemaking. In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the Department 
of Homeland Security concurrently proposes to consolidate, update, and 
rename two current Department of Homeland Security systems of records 
titled, ``Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, DHS/CBP-001 Automated Commercial Environment/International 
Trade Data System System of Records'' and ``Department of Homeland 
Security/U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS/CBP-015 Automated 
Commercial System System of Records'' as one new system of records. The 
consolidated system of records notice will be titled, ``Department of 
Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS/CBP-001 
Import Information System System of Records.'' This system of records 
will continue to collect and maintain records on all commercial goods 
imported into the United States, as well as information pertaining to 
the carrier, broker, importer, and other persons associated with the 
manifest, import, or commercial entry transactions for the goods. In 
this proposed rulemaking, the Department proposes to exempt portions of 
the system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act 
because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement 
requirements.

DATES:  Comments must be received on or before September 16, 2015.

ADDRESSES:  You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS-
2015-0046, by one of the following methods:
     Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-343-4010.
     Mail: Karen L. Neuman, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy 
Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal 
information provided.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions, please contact: 
John Connors (202) 344-1610, CBP Privacy Officer, Office of the 
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Washington, DC 20229. 
For privacy questions, please contact: Karen L. Neuman, (202) 343-1717, 
Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, 
Washington, DC 20528-0655.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) proposes to consolidate, update, and rename as one 
system of records notice (SORN) the information currently contained in 
two DHS SORNs titled, ``DHS/CBP-001 Automated Commercial Environment/
International Trade Data System (ACE/ITDS) System of Records'' (71 FR 
3109, January 19, 2006) and ``DHS/CBP-015 Automated Commercial System 
(ACS) System of Records'' (73 FR 77759, December 19, 2008) . This new 
SORN, entitled ``DHS/CBP-001 Import Information System (IIS),'' will 
inform the public about changes to the

[[Page 49176]]

categories of individuals, categories of records, and routine uses 
contained in the consolidation of the former ACS and ACE/ITDS SORNs.
    ACS, a decades old trade information database and information 
technology (IT) system, was deployed to track, control, and process all 
commercial goods imported into the United States. ACE, part of a multi-
year modernization effort since 2001 to replace ACS, continues to be 
designed to manage CBP's import trade data and related transaction 
information. ACE/ITDS serves three sets of core stakeholders: The 
internal DHS/CBP users, Participating Government Agencies (PGA), and 
the trade community. ACE is the IT backbone for the ITDS, an 
interagency initiative formalized under the SAFE Port Act of 2006 to 
create a single window for the trade community and PGAs involved in 
importing and exporting. DHS/CBP has provided notice to the public and 
trade community that in the future, ACS, the IT system, will be fully 
phased out and replaced by ACE. As such, and to simplify the trade 
community's and the public's understanding of how trade information 
will be handled after ACE implementation, DHS/CBP is publishing this 
Import Information System (IIS) SORN to identify a single repository 
for import trade information. DHS/CBP is also publishing a combined 
ACE-ITDS/ACS Privacy Impact Assessment on its Web site (http://www.dhs.gov/privacy) to inform the public of the operation and inter-
connectedness of the IT systems, ACS and ACE, and to assess the privacy 
impact of these systems using the fair information practice principles. 
This IIS system of records allows DHS/CBP to collect and maintain 
records on all commercial goods imported into the United States, along 
with related information about persons associated with those 
transactions, and manifest information.
    As part of this consolidation and issuance of IIS, the category of 
individuals and category of records sections in the former ACS and ACE-
ITDS have been merged to account for the data in both IT systems, as 
well as paper records related to the information in these systems. The 
category of individuals section is amended to remove reference to DHS/
CBP employees and employees of other federal agencies for purposes of 
maintaining their user access accounts to the ACE-ITDS Portal, because 
these individuals are now covered under a DHS-wide SORN, ``DHS/ALL-004 
General Information Technology Access Account Records System (GITAARS) 
(77 FR 70792, November 27, 2012). The category of records for IIS will 
also include notations and results of examinations and document review 
for cleared merchandise to clarify and better identify DHS and PGA-
generated information related to the processing of the import entry 
transaction. Additionally, the category of records is being expanded to 
address the expansion of information DHS/CBP proposes to collect on its 
revised Importer ID Input Record (CBP Form 5106). DHS/CBP is adding 
required elements for the name (First, Middle, Last) and business 
contact information (job title and phone) of Senior Company Officers of 
the Importer; DHS/CBP is also adding optional data fields on the form 
for the Senior Officers to provide Social Security number (SSN) or 
Passport Number and Country of Issuance. These latter, optional data 
elements are to facilitate Importer screening and verification.
    The authorities sections from the previous SORNs have been 
combined, reconciled to address duplication, and updated to account for 
expanded information collected about business associations as part of 
the ACE-ITDS Portal user account. The purpose section for IIS reflects 
an update to the combined purposes for ACS and ACE-ITDS and addresses 
DHS/CBP's broad use of its import trade transaction IT systems (ACS and 
ACE) to collect and manage records to track, control, and process all 
commercial goods imported into the United States.
    Consistent with DHS's information-sharing mission, information 
stored in the DHS/CBP-001 Import Information System (IIS) may be shared 
with other DHS Components that have a need to know the information to 
carry out their national security, law enforcement, immigration, or 
other homeland security functions. In addition, information may be 
shared with appropriate federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, 
foreign, or international government agencies consistent with the 
routine uses set forth in this SORN and as otherwise authorized under 
the Privacy Act.
    Information in IIS may be shared for the same routine uses as were 
previously published in ACS and ACE-ITDS, and are now updated in this 
document:
     ACS's former Routine Use K is now reclassified as Routine 
Use G.
    [cir] Routine Use G permits sharing of data under the following 
circumstances: ``To appropriate federal, state, local, tribal, or 
foreign governmental agencies or multilateral governmental 
organizations responsible for investigating or prosecuting the 
violations of, or for enforcing or implementing, a statute, rule, 
regulation, order, license, or treaty where DHS determines that the 
information would assist in the enforcement of civil or criminal 
laws.''
     ACE-ITDS's former Routine Use 3 is now reclassified as 
Routine Use K.
    [cir] Routine Use K permits sharing of data under the following 
circumstances: ``To a federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, 
foreign, or international agency, maintaining civil, criminal or other 
relevant enforcement information, or other pertinent information, which 
has requested information relevant to or necessary to the requesting 
agency's or the bureau's hiring or retention of an individual, or 
issuance of a security clearance, license, contract, grant, or other 
benefit.''
    Additionally, DHS/CBP is adding another routine use to IIS, Routine 
Use R, to provide explicit coverage for the mandated release of 
Manifest Information as set forth in section 1431 of title 19, United 
States Code and implemented through title 19, Code of Federal 
Regulations, part 103:
     Routine Use R permits sharing of data under the following 
circumstances: ``To paid subscribers, in accordance with applicable 
regulations, for the purpose of providing access to manifest 
information as set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1431.''
    DHS/CBP will not assert any exemptions with regard to information 
provided by or on behalf of an individual. However, this data may be 
shared with law enforcement and/or intelligence agencies pursuant to 
the routine uses identified in the IIS SORN and as otherwise authorized 
under the Privacy Act. The Privacy Act requires that DHS maintain an 
accounting of such disclosures. Disclosing the fact that a law 
enforcement and/or intelligence agency has sought particular records 
may interfere with or disclose techniques and procedures related to 
ongoing law enforcement investigations. As such, DHS is issuing a 
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to exempt this system of records from 
certain provisions of the Privacy Act elsewhere in the Federal 
Register. This updated system will be included in DHS's inventory of 
record systems.

II. Privacy Act

    The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a 
statutory framework governing the means by which Federal Government 
agencies collect, maintain, use, and disseminate personally 
identifiable information. The Privacy Act applies to information that 
is maintained in a ``system of records.'' A ``system of

[[Page 49177]]

records'' is a group of any records under the control of an agency from 
which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some 
identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to 
the individual. In the Privacy Act, an individual is defined to 
encompass U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. As a matter of 
policy, DHS extends administrative Privacy Act protections to all 
individuals where systems of records maintain information on U.S. 
citizens, lawful permanent residents, and non-immigrant aliens.
    The Privacy Act allows government agencies to exempt certain 
records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims 
an exemption, however, it must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to 
make clear to the public the reasons why a particular exemption is 
claimed.
    DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy 
Act for DHS/CBP-001 Import Information System System of Records.
    No exemption shall be asserted with respect to information 
maintained in the system as it relates to data submitted by or on 
behalf of a person who travels to visit the United States, nor shall an 
exemption be asserted with respect to the resulting determination 
(authorized to travel, not authorized to travel, pending).
    Some information in DHS/CBP-001 Import Information System System of 
Records relates to official DHS national security, law enforcement or 
intelligence activities. This system may contain records or information 
pertaining to the accounting of disclosures made from IIS to other law 
enforcement or intelligence agencies (Federal, State, local, foreign, 
international, or tribal) in accordance with the published routine 
uses. For the accounting of these disclosures only, in accordance with 
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k)(2), DHS will claim the original exemptions 
for these records or information from subsection (c)(3), (e)(8), and 
(g) of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, as necessary and 
appropriate to protect such information. Moreover, DHS will add this 
exemption to Appendix C to 6 CFR part 5, DHS Systems of Records Exempt 
from the Privacy Act. Such exempt records or information may be law 
enforcement or national security investigation records, law enforcement 
activity and encounter records, or terrorist screening records.
    DHS needs these exemptions in order to protect information relating 
to law enforcement investigations from disclosure to subjects of 
investigations and others who could interfere with investigatory and 
law enforcement activities. Specifically, the exemptions are required 
to: Preclude subjects of investigations from frustrating the 
investigative process; avoid disclosure of investigative techniques; 
protect the identities and physical safety of confidential informants 
and of law enforcement personnel; ensure DHS's and other federal 
agencies' ability to obtain information from third parties and other 
sources; protect the privacy of third parties; and safeguard sensitive 
information.
    Nonetheless, DHS will examine each request on a case-by-case basis, 
and, after conferring with the appropriate component or agency, may 
waive applicable exemptions in appropriate circumstances and where it 
would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect the law 
enforcement or national security investigation.
    Again, DHS will not assert any exemption with respect to 
information maintained in the system that is collected from a person 
and submitted by that person's air or vessel carrier, if that person, 
or his or her agent, seeks access or amendment of such information.

List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5

    Freedom of information, Privacy.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend 
Chapter I of Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:

PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION

0
1. The authority citation for Part 5 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et 
seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.

0
2. At the end of Appendix C to Part 5, add paragraph ``74'' to read as 
follows:

Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy 
Act.

* * * * *
    74. DHS/CBP-001, Import Information System (IIS). A portion of 
the following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), 
(e)(8), and (g)(1) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), and from 5 
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). Further, no 
exemption shall be asserted with respect to information maintained 
in the system as it relates to data submitted by or on behalf of a 
person who travels to visit the United States and crosses the 
border, nor shall an exemption be asserted with respect to the 
resulting determination (approval or denial). After conferring with 
the appropriate component or agency, DHS may waive applicable 
exemptions in appropriate circumstances and where it would not 
appear to interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement 
purposes of the systems from which the information is recompiled or 
in which it is contained. Exemptions from the above particular 
subsections are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be determined 
at the time a request is made, when information in this system of 
records is may impede a law enforcement, intelligence activities and 
national security investigation:
    (a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for Disclosure) because 
making available to a record subject the accounting of disclosures 
from records concerning him or her would specifically reveal any 
investigative interest in the individual. Revealing this information 
could reasonably be expected to compromise ongoing efforts to 
investigate a violation of U.S. law, including investigations of a 
known or suspected terrorist, by notifying the record subject that 
he or she is under investigation. This information could also permit 
the record subject to take measures to impede the investigation, 
e.g., destroy evidence, intimidate potential witnesses, or flee the 
area to avoid or impede the investigation.
    (b) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because to 
require individual notice of disclosure of information due to 
compulsory legal process would pose an impossible administrative 
burden on DHS and other agencies and could alert the subjects of 
counterterrorism or law enforcement investigations to the fact of 
those investigations when not previously known.
    (c) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that 
the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy 
Act.

    Dated: July 31, 2015.
Karen L. Neuman,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 2015-19726 Filed 8-14-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-14-P



                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 158 / Monday, August 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules                                          49175

                                                    no later than 30 days after either the                  § 1605.31 Contributions missed as a result            as well as information pertaining to the
                                                    date the TSP provides the participant                   of military service.                                  carrier, broker, importer, and other
                                                    with a notice reflecting the error or the               *     *     *     *    *                              persons associated with the manifest,
                                                    date the TSP makes available on its Web                   (d) Breakage. The employee is                       import, or commercial entry
                                                    site a participant statement reflecting                 entitled to breakage on agency                        transactions for the goods. In this
                                                    the error, whichever is earlier. The                    contributions made under paragraph (c)                proposed rulemaking, the Department
                                                    employing agency must promptly notify                   of this section. The employee will elect              proposes to exempt portions of the
                                                    the TSP that the participant is entitled                to have the calculation based on either               system of records from one or more
                                                    to breakage.                                            the contribution allocation(s) on file for            provisions of the Privacy Act because of
                                                       (3) If a participant or beneficiary fails            the participant during the period of                  criminal, civil, and administrative
                                                    to file a claim for breakage for errors                 military service or the default                       enforcement requirements.
                                                    involving incorrect dates of birth in a                 investment fund in effect for the                     DATES: Comments must be received on
                                                    timely manner, the employing agency                     participant; the participant must make                or before September 16, 2015.
                                                    may nevertheless, in its sound                          this election at the same time his or her             ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
                                                    discretion, pay breakage on any such                    makeup schedule is established                        identified by docket number DHS–
                                                    error that is brought to its attention.                 pursuant to § 1605.11(c).                             2015–0046, by one of the following
                                                    *      *      *     *    *                              [FR Doc. 2015–20273 Filed 8–14–15; 8:45 am]           methods:
                                                    ■ 6. Amend § 1605.22, by revising                       BILLING CODE 6760–01–P                                   • Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
                                                    paragraphs (b)(2), (c)(2), and (c)(3) to                                                                      http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
                                                    read as follows:                                                                                              instructions for submitting comments.
                                                                                                            DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND                                   • Fax: 202–343–4010.
                                                    § 1605.22 Claims for correction of Board                                                                         • Mail: Karen L. Neuman, Chief
                                                    or TSP record keeper errors; time                       SECURITY
                                                                                                                                                                  Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
                                                    limitations.
                                                                                                            Office of the Secretary                               Department of Homeland Security,
                                                    *      *      *     *    *                                                                                    Washington, DC 20528.
                                                       (b) * * *                                                                                                     Instructions: All submissions received
                                                                                                            6 CFR Part 5
                                                       (1) * * *                                                                                                  must include the agency name and
                                                       (2) For errors involving an investment               [Docket No. DHS–2015–0046]                            docket number for this notice. All
                                                    in the wrong fund caused by Board or                                                                          comments received will be posted
                                                    TSP record keeper error, the Board or                   Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of                without change to http://
                                                    the TSP record keeper must promptly                     Exemptions; Department of Homeland                    www.regulations.gov, including any
                                                    pay breakage if it is discovered within                 Security DHS/CBP–001, Import                          personal information provided.
                                                    30 days of the issuance of the most                     Information System, System of                            Docket: For access to the docket to
                                                    recent TSP participant (or loan)                        Records, System of Records                            read background documents or
                                                    statement, transaction confirmation, or                 AGENCY: Privacy Office, Department of                 comments received, go to http://
                                                    other notice that reflected the error,                  Homeland Security.                                    www.regulations.gov.
                                                    whichever is earlier. If it is discovered                                                                     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
                                                                                                            ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
                                                    after that time, the Board or TSP record                                                                      general questions, please contact: John
                                                    keeper may use its sound discretion in                  SUMMARY:   The Department of Homeland                 Connors (202) 344–1610, CBP Privacy
                                                    deciding whether to pay breakage, but,                  Security is giving concurrent notice for              Officer, Office of the Commissioner,
                                                    in any event, must act promptly in                      the newly established ‘‘Department of                 U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
                                                    doing so.                                               Homeland Security/CBP–001, Import                     Washington, DC 20229. For privacy
                                                       (c) * * *                                            Information System, System of Records’’               questions, please contact: Karen L.
                                                       (1) * * *                                            and this proposed rulemaking. In                      Neuman, (202) 343–1717, Chief Privacy
                                                       (2) For errors involving an investment               accordance with the Privacy Act of                    Officer, Privacy Office, Department of
                                                    in the wrong fund of which a                            1974, the Department of Homeland                      Homeland Security, Washington, DC
                                                    participant or beneficiary has                          Security concurrently proposes to                     20528–0655.
                                                    knowledge, he or she may file a claim                   consolidate, update, and rename two                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                    for breakage with the Board or TSP                      current Department of Homeland
                                                    record keeper no later than 30 days after               Security systems of records titled,                   I. Background
                                                    the TSP provides the participant with a                 ‘‘Department of Homeland Security/U.S.                   In accordance with the Privacy Act of
                                                    transaction confirmation or other notice                Customs and Border Protection, DHS/                   1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Department of
                                                    reflecting the error, or makes available                CBP–001 Automated Commercial                          Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs
                                                    on its Web site a participant statement                 Environment/International Trade Data                  and Border Protection (CBP) proposes to
                                                    reflecting the error, whichever is earlier.             System System of Records’’ and                        consolidate, update, and rename as one
                                                    The Board or TSP record keeper must                     ‘‘Department of Homeland Security/U.S.                system of records notice (SORN) the
                                                    promptly pay breakage for such errors.                  Customs and Border Protection, DHS/                   information currently contained in two
                                                       (3) If a participant or beneficiary fails            CBP–015 Automated Commercial                          DHS SORNs titled, ‘‘DHS/CBP–001
                                                    to file a claim for breakage concerning                 System System of Records’’ as one new                 Automated Commercial Environment/
                                                    an error involving an investment in the                 system of records. The consolidated                   International Trade Data System (ACE/
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                    wrong fund in a timely manner, the                      system of records notice will be titled,              ITDS) System of Records’’ (71 FR 3109,
                                                    Board or TSP record keeper may                          ‘‘Department of Homeland Security/U.S.                January 19, 2006) and ‘‘DHS/CBP–015
                                                    nevertheless, in its sound discretion,                  Customs and Border Protection, DHS/                   Automated Commercial System (ACS)
                                                    pay breakage for any such error that is                 CBP–001 Import Information System                     System of Records’’ (73 FR 77759,
                                                    brought to its attention.                               System of Records.’’ This system of                   December 19, 2008) . This new SORN,
                                                    *      *      *     *    *                              records will continue to collect and                  entitled ‘‘DHS/CBP–001 Import
                                                    ■ 7. Amend § 1605.31 by revising                        maintain records on all commercial                    Information System (IIS),’’ will inform
                                                    paragraph (d) to read as follows:                       goods imported into the United States,                the public about changes to the


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:52 Aug 14, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00003   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM   17AUP1


                                                    49176                  Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 158 / Monday, August 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules

                                                    categories of individuals, categories of                category of records for IIS will also                 implementing, a statute, rule,
                                                    records, and routine uses contained in                  include notations and results of                      regulation, order, license, or treaty
                                                    the consolidation of the former ACS and                 examinations and document review for                  where DHS determines that the
                                                    ACE/ITDS SORNs.                                         cleared merchandise to clarify and                    information would assist in the
                                                       ACS, a decades old trade information                 better identify DHS and PGA-generated                 enforcement of civil or criminal laws.’’
                                                    database and information technology                     information related to the processing of                 • ACE–ITDS’s former Routine Use 3
                                                    (IT) system, was deployed to track,                     the import entry transaction.                         is now reclassified as Routine Use K.
                                                    control, and process all commercial                     Additionally, the category of records is                 Æ Routine Use K permits sharing of
                                                    goods imported into the United States.                  being expanded to address the                         data under the following circumstances:
                                                    ACE, part of a multi-year modernization                 expansion of information DHS/CBP                      ‘‘To a federal, state, local, tribal,
                                                    effort since 2001 to replace ACS,                       proposes to collect on its revised                    territorial, foreign, or international
                                                    continues to be designed to manage                      Importer ID Input Record (CBP Form                    agency, maintaining civil, criminal or
                                                    CBP’s import trade data and related                     5106). DHS/CBP is adding required                     other relevant enforcement information,
                                                    transaction information. ACE/ITDS                       elements for the name (First, Middle,                 or other pertinent information, which
                                                    serves three sets of core stakeholders:                 Last) and business contact information                has requested information relevant to or
                                                    The internal DHS/CBP users,                             (job title and phone) of Senior Company               necessary to the requesting agency’s or
                                                    Participating Government Agencies                       Officers of the Importer; DHS/CBP is                  the bureau’s hiring or retention of an
                                                    (PGA), and the trade community. ACE is                  also adding optional data fields on the               individual, or issuance of a security
                                                    the IT backbone for the ITDS, an                        form for the Senior Officers to provide               clearance, license, contract, grant, or
                                                    interagency initiative formalized under                 Social Security number (SSN) or                       other benefit.’’
                                                    the SAFE Port Act of 2006 to create a                   Passport Number and Country of                           Additionally, DHS/CBP is adding
                                                    single window for the trade community                   Issuance. These latter, optional data                 another routine use to IIS, Routine Use
                                                    and PGAs involved in importing and                      elements are to facilitate Importer                   R, to provide explicit coverage for the
                                                    exporting. DHS/CBP has provided                         screening and verification.                           mandated release of Manifest
                                                    notice to the public and trade                             The authorities sections from the                  Information as set forth in section 1431
                                                    community that in the future, ACS, the                  previous SORNs have been combined,                    of title 19, United States Code and
                                                    IT system, will be fully phased out and                 reconciled to address duplication, and                implemented through title 19, Code of
                                                    replaced by ACE. As such, and to                        updated to account for expanded                       Federal Regulations, part 103:
                                                    simplify the trade community’s and the                  information collected about business                     • Routine Use R permits sharing of
                                                    public’s understanding of how trade                     associations as part of the ACE–ITDS                  data under the following circumstances:
                                                    information will be handled after ACE                   Portal user account. The purpose                      ‘‘To paid subscribers, in accordance
                                                    implementation, DHS/CBP is publishing                   section for IIS reflects an update to the             with applicable regulations, for the
                                                    this Import Information System (IIS)                    combined purposes for ACS and ACE–                    purpose of providing access to manifest
                                                    SORN to identify a single repository for                ITDS and addresses DHS/CBP’s broad                    information as set forth in 19 U.S.C.
                                                    import trade information. DHS/CBP is                    use of its import trade transaction IT                1431.’’
                                                    also publishing a combined ACE–ITDS/                    systems (ACS and ACE) to collect and                     DHS/CBP will not assert any
                                                    ACS Privacy Impact Assessment on its                    manage records to track, control, and                 exemptions with regard to information
                                                    Web site (http://www.dhs.gov/privacy)                   process all commercial goods imported                 provided by or on behalf of an
                                                    to inform the public of the operation                   into the United States.                               individual. However, this data may be
                                                    and inter-connectedness of the IT                          Consistent with DHS’s information-                 shared with law enforcement and/or
                                                    systems, ACS and ACE, and to assess                     sharing mission, information stored in                intelligence agencies pursuant to the
                                                    the privacy impact of these systems                     the DHS/CBP–001 Import Information                    routine uses identified in the IIS SORN
                                                    using the fair information practice                     System (IIS) may be shared with other                 and as otherwise authorized under the
                                                    principles. This IIS system of records                  DHS Components that have a need to                    Privacy Act. The Privacy Act requires
                                                    allows DHS/CBP to collect and maintain                  know the information to carry out their               that DHS maintain an accounting of
                                                    records on all commercial goods                         national security, law enforcement,                   such disclosures. Disclosing the fact that
                                                    imported into the United States, along                  immigration, or other homeland security               a law enforcement and/or intelligence
                                                    with related information about persons                  functions. In addition, information may               agency has sought particular records
                                                    associated with those transactions, and                 be shared with appropriate federal,                   may interfere with or disclose
                                                    manifest information.                                   state, local, tribal, territorial, foreign, or        techniques and procedures related to
                                                       As part of this consolidation and                    international government agencies                     ongoing law enforcement investigations.
                                                    issuance of IIS, the category of                        consistent with the routine uses set                  As such, DHS is issuing a Notice of
                                                    individuals and category of records                     forth in this SORN and as otherwise                   Proposed Rulemaking to exempt this
                                                    sections in the former ACS and ACE–                     authorized under the Privacy Act.                     system of records from certain
                                                    ITDS have been merged to account for                       Information in IIS may be shared for               provisions of the Privacy Act elsewhere
                                                    the data in both IT systems, as well as                 the same routine uses as were                         in the Federal Register. This updated
                                                    paper records related to the information                previously published in ACS and ACE–                  system will be included in DHS’s
                                                    in these systems. The category of                       ITDS, and are now updated in this                     inventory of record systems.
                                                    individuals section is amended to                       document:
                                                    remove reference to DHS/CBP                                • ACS’s former Routine Use K is now                II. Privacy Act
                                                    employees and employees of other                        reclassified as Routine Use G.                           The Privacy Act embodies fair
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                    federal agencies for purposes of                           Æ Routine Use G permits sharing of                 information practice principles in a
                                                    maintaining their user access accounts                  data under the following circumstances:               statutory framework governing the
                                                    to the ACE–ITDS Portal, because these                   ‘‘To appropriate federal, state, local,               means by which Federal Government
                                                    individuals are now covered under a                     tribal, or foreign governmental agencies              agencies collect, maintain, use, and
                                                    DHS-wide SORN, ‘‘DHS/ALL–004                            or multilateral governmental                          disseminate personally identifiable
                                                    General Information Technology Access                   organizations responsible for                         information. The Privacy Act applies to
                                                    Account Records System (GITAARS) (77                    investigating or prosecuting the                      information that is maintained in a
                                                    FR 70792, November 27, 2012). The                       violations of, or for enforcing or                    ‘‘system of records.’’ A ‘‘system of


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:52 Aug 14, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00004   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM   17AUP1


                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 158 / Monday, August 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules                                                 49177

                                                    records’’ is a group of any records under               investigatory and law enforcement                     circumstances and where it would not appear
                                                    the control of an agency from which                     activities. Specifically, the exemptions              to interfere with or adversely affect the law
                                                    information is retrieved by the name of                 are required to: Preclude subjects of                 enforcement purposes of the systems from
                                                    the individual or by some identifying                   investigations from frustrating the                   which the information is recompiled or in
                                                                                                                                                                  which it is contained. Exemptions from the
                                                    number, symbol, or other identifying                    investigative process; avoid disclosure               above particular subsections are justified, on
                                                    particular assigned to the individual. In               of investigative techniques; protect the              a case-by-case basis to be determined at the
                                                    the Privacy Act, an individual is defined               identities and physical safety of                     time a request is made, when information in
                                                    to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful                   confidential informants and of law                    this system of records is may impede a law
                                                    permanent residents. As a matter of                     enforcement personnel; ensure DHS’s                   enforcement, intelligence activities and
                                                    policy, DHS extends administrative                      and other federal agencies’ ability to                national security investigation:
                                                    Privacy Act protections to all                          obtain information from third parties                    (a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for
                                                    individuals where systems of records                    and other sources; protect the privacy of             Disclosure) because making available to a
                                                    maintain information on U.S. citizens,                  third parties; and safeguard sensitive                record subject the accounting of disclosures
                                                    lawful permanent residents, and non-                                                                          from records concerning him or her would
                                                                                                            information.                                          specifically reveal any investigative interest
                                                    immigrant aliens.                                          Nonetheless, DHS will examine each                 in the individual. Revealing this information
                                                       The Privacy Act allows government                    request on a case-by-case basis, and,                 could reasonably be expected to compromise
                                                    agencies to exempt certain records from                 after conferring with the appropriate                 ongoing efforts to investigate a violation of
                                                    the access and amendment provisions. If                 component or agency, may waive                        U.S. law, including investigations of a known
                                                    an agency claims an exemption,                          applicable exemptions in appropriate                  or suspected terrorist, by notifying the record
                                                    however, it must issue a Notice of                      circumstances and where it would not                  subject that he or she is under investigation.
                                                    Proposed Rulemaking to make clear to                    appear to interfere with or adversely                 This information could also permit the
                                                    the public the reasons why a particular                 affect the law enforcement or national                record subject to take measures to impede the
                                                    exemption is claimed.                                                                                         investigation, e.g., destroy evidence,
                                                                                                            security investigation.
                                                       DHS is claiming exemptions from                                                                            intimidate potential witnesses, or flee the
                                                                                                               Again, DHS will not assert any                     area to avoid or impede the investigation.
                                                    certain requirements of the Privacy Act                 exemption with respect to information                    (b) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
                                                    for DHS/CBP–001 Import Information                      maintained in the system that is                      Individuals) because to require individual
                                                    System System of Records.                               collected from a person and submitted                 notice of disclosure of information due to
                                                       No exemption shall be asserted with                  by that person’s air or vessel carrier, if            compulsory legal process would pose an
                                                    respect to information maintained in the                that person, or his or her agent, seeks               impossible administrative burden on DHS
                                                    system as it relates to data submitted by               access or amendment of such                           and other agencies and could alert the
                                                    or on behalf of a person who travels to                 information.                                          subjects of counterterrorism or law
                                                    visit the United States, nor shall an                                                                         enforcement investigations to the fact of
                                                    exemption be asserted with respect to                   List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5                      those investigations when not previously
                                                    the resulting determination (authorized                                                                       known.
                                                                                                              Freedom of information, Privacy.
                                                    to travel, not authorized to travel,                                                                             (c) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies)
                                                                                                              For the reasons stated in the                       to the extent that the system is exempt from
                                                    pending).
                                                                                                            preamble, DHS proposes to amend                       other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
                                                       Some information in DHS/CBP–001
                                                                                                            Chapter I of Title 6, Code of Federal                    Dated: July 31, 2015.
                                                    Import Information System System of
                                                    Records relates to official DHS national                Regulations, as follows:                              Karen L. Neuman,
                                                    security, law enforcement or                            PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS                          Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
                                                    intelligence activities. This system may                                                                      Homeland Security.
                                                                                                            AND INFORMATION
                                                    contain records or information                                                                                [FR Doc. 2015–19726 Filed 8–14–15; 8:45 am]
                                                    pertaining to the accounting of                         ■ 1. The authority citation for Part 5                BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
                                                    disclosures made from IIS to other law                  continues to read as follows:
                                                    enforcement or intelligence agencies
                                                                                                              Authority: Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat.
                                                    (Federal, State, local, foreign,                        2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301.             NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISION
                                                    international, or tribal) in accordance                 Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
                                                    with the published routine uses. For the                                                                      10 CFR Chapter I
                                                    accounting of these disclosures only, in                ■ 2. At the end of Appendix C to Part
                                                    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and                 5, add paragraph ‘‘74’’ to read as                    [NRC–2015–0176]
                                                    (k)(2), DHS will claim the original                     follows:
                                                                                                                                                                  Abnormal Occurrence Reports
                                                    exemptions for these records or                         Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
                                                    information from subsection (c)(3),                     Records Exempt From the Privacy Act.                  AGENCY:  Nuclear Regulatory
                                                    (e)(8), and (g) of the Privacy Act of 1974,                                                                   Commission.
                                                                                                            *      *      *      *       *
                                                    as amended, as necessary and                              74. DHS/CBP–001, Import Information                 ACTION: Proposed revision to policy
                                                    appropriate to protect such information.                System (IIS). A portion of the following              statement; request for comments.
                                                    Moreover, DHS will add this exemption                   system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C.
                                                    to Appendix C to 6 CFR part 5, DHS                      552a(c)(3), (e)(8), and (g)(1) pursuant to 5          SUMMARY:   The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
                                                    Systems of Records Exempt from the                      U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), and from 5 U.S.C.                  Commission (NRC) is proposing
                                                    Privacy Act. Such exempt records or                     552a(c)(3) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).           revisions to its policy statement on
                                                    information may be law enforcement or                   Further, no exemption shall be asserted with          reporting abnormal occurrences (AO) to
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                    national security investigation records,                respect to information maintained in the              Congress. The proposed revisions would
                                                    law enforcement activity and encounter                  system as it relates to data submitted by or          clarify and restructure the criteria used
                                                                                                            on behalf of a person who travels to visit the        by the NRC and Agreement States for
                                                    records, or terrorist screening records.                United States and crosses the border, nor
                                                       DHS needs these exemptions in order                  shall an exemption be asserted with respect
                                                                                                                                                                  determining whether to consider an
                                                    to protect information relating to law                  to the resulting determination (approval or           incident or event as an AO. The
                                                    enforcement investigations from                         denial). After conferring with the appropriate        proposed revisions to the policy
                                                    disclosure to subjects of investigations                component or agency, DHS may waive                    statement would ensure consistency
                                                    and others who could interfere with                     applicable exemptions in appropriate                  with current NRC guidance and


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:52 Aug 14, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00005   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM   17AUP1



Document Created: 2015-12-15 11:07:22
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 11:07:22
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionNotice of proposed rulemaking.
DatesComments must be received on or before September 16, 2015.
ContactFor general questions, please contact: John Connors (202) 344-1610, CBP Privacy Officer, Office of the Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Washington, DC 20229. For privacy questions, please contact: Karen L. Neuman, (202) 343-1717, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528-0655.
FR Citation80 FR 49175 
CFR AssociatedFreedom of Information and Privacy

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR