80 FR 49184 - Periodic Reporting
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 158 (August 17, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 158 (August 17, 2015)
| Page Range | 49184-49186 | |
| FR Document | 2015-20232 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 158 (Monday, August 17, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 49184-49186] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-20232] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 39 CFR Part 3050 [Docket No. RM2015-16; Order No. 2654] Periodic Reporting AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing requesting that the Commission initiate an informal rulemaking proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles relating to periodic reports (Proposal Seven). This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps. DATES: Comments are due: September 25, 2015. Reply Comments are due: October 16, 2015. ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing Online system at http://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Summary of Proposal III. Initial Commission Action IV. Ordering Paragraphs I. Introduction On August 5, 2015, the Postal Service filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR 3050.11 requesting that the Commission initiate an informal rulemaking proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles relating to the Postal Service's periodic reports.\1\ Proposal Seven is attached to the Petition and proposes an analytical method change relating to the avoided costs for Flats Sequencing System (FSS) workshare discounts. Petition at 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Petition of the United States Postal Service for the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Seven), August 5, 2015 (Petition). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This Petition was filed in response to Order No. 2472, which directed the Postal Service ``to file a proposed methodology for determining the costs avoided for the Presorted FSS workshare discounts, as described in the body of [Order No. 2472], within 90 days of the date of [Order No. 2472].'' \2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Docket No. R2015-4, Order on Revised Price Adjustments for Standard Mail, Periodicals, and Package Services Products and Related Mail Classification Changes, May 7, 2015, at 62 (Order No. 2472). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Summary of Proposal Under Proposal Seven, the Postal Service seeks to address the avoided costs relating to FSS mail. Petition, Proposal Seven at 1. The Postal Service bifurcates Proposal Seven into the Mail Processing and the Delivery elements of the avoided costs for FSS workshare discounts. Id. A. Section One: Proposed Method for Calculating Mail Processing Cost Avoidances The Postal Service seeks to modify the modeling methodology used in the USPS-FY14-11 (Docket No. ACR2014) Standard Mail Flats Mail Processing Cost Model to estimate the mail processing cost avoidances of FSS presorted Standard Flats. Petition, Proposal Seven, Section One at 1. The Postal Service expands the Standard Mail Flats Mail Processing Cost Model to identify the unique characteristics and flows of FSS-prepared Standard Flats. Id. As part of Library Reference USPS- RM2015-16/1 filed with the Petition, the Postal Service provides three models supporting this section of Proposal Seven. Id. The Postal Service also proposes changes to the USPS-FY14-11 (Docket No. ACR2014) Periodicals Flats Mail Processing Cost Model. Id. at 4.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The proposed changes to the Periodicals Flats Mail Processing Cost Model were filed in Docket No. RM2015-18. See Docket No. RM2015-18, Petition of the United States Postal Service for the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Nine), August 5, 2015, Attachment at 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- There are nine modifications proposed by the Postal Service in Section One of Proposal Seven, all of which apply to the Standard Mail Flats Cost Model. Petition, Proposal Seven, Section One at 4. Two of the proposed modifications also apply to the Periodicals Model. Id. 1. Revision of the Methodology Used To Estimate the Proportion of Flats Processed in Mechanized Incoming Secondary Operations (Modification One) The Postal Service presents a process to estimate the proportion of flat-shaped mail processed in mechanized incoming secondary operations. Id. at 4-8. Although over 98 percent of flats destinate in the service territories of plants that have mechanized equipment, certain facilities choose to perform the incoming secondary sortation manually for a variety of reasons, including low volume, service commitments, and [[Page 49185]] operating window/capacity restraints. Id. at 4-5. The Postal Service asserts that its proposed methodology accounts for the two different technologies performing mechanized incoming secondary sortation--the Automated Flats Sorting Machine 100 (AFSM 100) and the FSS. Id. at 5. The Postal Service also represents that its methodology excludes letter shaped mail worked in flat operations, pieces entered in Carrier Route bundles that have broken and therefore require incoming secondary sortation, rejects from FSS operations, and pieces destinating in FSS zones that are not sorted on the FSS. See id. at 5-8. This modification applies to both the Standard Mail and Periodicals Flats Mail Processing Cost Models. 2. Changes to Bundle Processing Flows To Account for Increased Mechanized Incoming Secondary Piece Processing The Postal Service proposes to adjust the bundle flow formulae for consistency with the mechanized incoming secondary piece distribution calculated under Modification One. See id. at 8-9. The Postal Service states that bundles for mechanized incoming secondary sortation will not incur an incoming secondary bundle sort. See id. The Postal Service explains that bundles for zones worked manually will incur an additional bundle sort at the delivery unit. Id. at 9. This modification applies to the Standard Mail Flats Mail Processing Cost Model. 3. Introduction of FSS Bundle Flows The Postal Service assumes that no FSS bundles will incur a sortation at the delivery unit. Id. Aside from this assumption, the Postal Service calculates the bundle flows for FSS bundles using the same methodology used for other bundle types. Id. This modification applies to the Standard Mail Flats Mail Processing Cost Model. 4. FSS Presort Piece Model and Costs The Postal Service states that FSS presorted pieces flow directly into piece sortation on the FSS, bypassing outgoing primary, outgoing secondary, managed mail, and incoming primary operations. Id. The Postal Service represents that it models such FSS presorted pieces using the same basic methodology previously used to model piece flows. Id. This modification applies to the Standard Mail Flats Mail Processing Cost Model. 5. Updating 5-Digit Piece Model and Costs The Postal Service represents that 5-Digit pieces do not flow into FSS operations and proposes to update the 5-Digit piece model to reflect this flow. Id. at 10. The Postal Service represents that the relative incidence of manual incoming secondary sortation is higher for 5-Digit pieces by a factor of one over one minus the FSS coverage factor. Id. This modification applies to the Standard Mail Flats Mail Processing Cost Model. 6. Updating Mixed ADC, ADC, 3-Digit for Incoming Secondary Coverage The Postal Service proposes to update the area distribution center (ADC), mixed ADC, and 3-Digit models to incorporate the recalculation of the mechanized incoming secondary sortation. Id. This modification applies to the Standard Mail Flats Mail Processing Cost Model. 7. Explicit Modeling of Mail Preparation The Postal Service states that the current model includes the hours associated with mail preparation for the FSS in the calculation of the FSS productivities. See id. at 11. However, because such AFSM 100 preparation costs are included in the calculation of the AFSM 100 productivities, the Postal Service observes that a portion of the AFSM 100 preparation costs are allocated incorrectly to FSS prepared pieces through the Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA) adjustment factor. See id. The Postal Service proposes to model AFSM 100 preparation costs using the methodology used in the Periodicals Flats Mail Processing Model. See id. This modification applies to the Standard Mail Flats Mail Processing Cost Model. 8. CRA Adjustment Factor Adjusted for the FSS The Postal Service uses the CRA adjustment factor to calibrate the model to CRA costs and to distribute non-modeled costs to the appropriate rate category. Id. The Postal Service states that applying the CRA adjustment factor as is done in the current methodology would distort measured cost avoidances by overdistributing non-modeled costs to FSS pieces. Id. at 12. The Postal Service represents that it will calculate the CRA adjustment factor to ensure the non-modeled costs distributed to FSS pieces are equal to those distributed to Five-Digit pieces. Id. This modification applies to the Standard Mail Flats Mail Processing Cost Model. 9. FSS Realization Factor The Postal Service represents that it introduced a FSS Realization Factor to measure the proportion of FSS eligible mail that is processed on the FSS. Id. at 12-13. According to the Postal Service, this FSS Realization Factor captures the fact that mail that destinates in a FSS zone and arrives after the end of first-pass processing may be processed on the AFSM 100 rather than the FSS to avoid delay. Id. This modification applies to both the Standard Mail and Periodicals Flats Mail Processing Cost Models. B. Section Two: Proposed Method for Calculating Delivery Costs The Postal Service proposes a method to disaggregate delivery costs for Periodicals Flats, Bound Printed Matter Flats, Standard Flats and Carrier Route Flats (not including High Density or Saturation) between those destinating in FSS zones and those destinating in non-FSS zones. Petition, Proposal Seven: Section Two at 1. This method uses operational assumptions and models rather than data directly collected from cost systems, and calculates separate delivery costs for the relevant products based on whether pieces are destinating in FSS or non-FSS zones. Id. at 3. The proposed computing method begins with a product's component group costs in three segments: Cost Segment 6, City Carrier In-Office Activities; Cost Segment 7, City Carrier Street Activities; and Cost Segment 10, Rural Carriers Office and Street Activities. Id. at 3-9. Within each cost segment, the purpose is to disaggregate costs into FSS zone costs and non-FSS zone costs. Id. III. Initial Commission Action The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2015-16 for consideration of matters raised by the Petition. Additional information concerning the Petition may be accessed via the Commission's Web site at http://www.prc.gov. Interested persons may submit comments on the Petition and Proposal Seven no later than September 25, 2015. Reply comments are due no later than October 16, 2015. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Katalin K. Clendenin is designated as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding. IV. Ordering Paragraphs It is ordered: 1. The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2015-16 for consideration of the matters raised by the Petition of the United States Postal Service for the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Seven), filed August 5, 2015. [[Page 49186]] 2. Comments are due no later than September 25, 2015. Reply comments are due no later than October 16, 2015. 3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Katalin K. Clendenin to serve as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in this docket. 4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this Order in the Federal Register. By the Commission. Ruth Ann Abrams, Acting Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-20232 Filed 8-14-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
![49184 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 158 / Monday, August 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
activated by NOTAM at least 24 hours in POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION II. Summary of Proposal
advance, not to exceed 20 days per year.
Controlling agency. FAA, Houston ARTCC. Under Proposal Seven, the Postal
39 CFR Part 3050 Service seeks to address the avoided
Using agency. U.S. Navy, Commander,
Naval Special Warfare Command, Naval [Docket No. RM2015–16; Order No. 2654] costs relating to FSS mail. Petition,
Special Warfare N31 Branch, Stennis Space Proposal Seven at 1. The Postal Service
Center, Bay St. Louis, MS. Periodic Reporting bifurcates Proposal Seven into the Mail
R–4403E Stennis Space Center, MS [New] AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. Processing and the Delivery elements of
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. the avoided costs for FSS workshare
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 30°29′37″ N., discounts. Id.
long. 89°35′16″ W.;
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
to lat. 30°29′37″ N., long. 89°32′33″ W.; A. Section One: Proposed Method for
thence clockwise along a 0.85-M arc recent Postal Service filing requesting
Calculating Mail Processing Cost
centered that the Commission initiate an informal
Avoidances
at lat. 30°28′46″ N., long. 89°32′33″ W.; rulemaking proceeding to consider
to lat. 30°28′46″ N., long. 89°31′34″ W.; changes to analytical principles relating The Postal Service seeks to modify the
to lat. 30°26′25″ N., long. 89°31′34″ W.; to periodic reports (Proposal Seven). modeling methodology used in the
to lat. 30°24′02″ N., long. 89°31′34″ W.; This notice informs the public of the USPS–FY14–11 (Docket No. ACR2014)
thence counterclockwise along a 4.2-NM filing, invites public comment, and Standard Mail Flats Mail Processing
arc centered takes other administrative steps. Cost Model to estimate the mail
at lat. 30°22′04″ N., long. 89°27′17″ W.; processing cost avoidances of FSS
DATES: Comments are due: September
to lat. 30°22′35″ N., long. 89°32′06″ W.; presorted Standard Flats. Petition,
to lat. 30°22′35″ N., long. 89°35′27″ W.; 25, 2015. Reply Comments are due:
October 16, 2015. Proposal Seven, Section One at 1. The
to lat. 30°27′58″ N., long. 89°35′27″ W,;
ADDRESSES: Submit comments Postal Service expands the Standard
to lat. 30°28′47″ N., long. 89°35′27″ W.;
to the point of beginning. electronically via the Commission’s Mail Flats Mail Processing Cost Model
Designated altitudes. Surface to 10,000 feet Filing Online system at http:// to identify the unique characteristics
MSL. www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit and flows of FSS-prepared Standard
Time of designation. Intermittent, 2000 to comments electronically should contact Flats. Id. As part of Library Reference
0500 local time, as activated by NOTAM at the person identified in the FOR FURTHER USPS–RM2015–16/1 filed with the
least 24 hours in advance; and 1800 to 2000 Petition, the Postal Service provides
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
local time, November 1 to March 1, as three models supporting this section of
activated by NOTAM at least 24 hours in telephone for advice on filing
alternatives. Proposal Seven. Id. The Postal Service
advance, not to exceed 20 days per year. also proposes changes to the USPS–
Controlling agency. FAA, Houston ARTCC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Using agency. U.S. Navy, Commander,
FY14–11 (Docket No. ACR2014)
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at Periodicals Flats Mail Processing Cost
Naval Special Warfare Command, Naval 202–789–6820.
Special Warfare N31 Branch, Stennis Space Model. Id. at 4.3
Center, Bay St. Louis, MS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There are nine modifications
Table of Contents proposed by the Postal Service in
R–4403F Stennis Space Center, MS [New]
Section One of Proposal Seven, all of
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 30°29′37″ N., I. Introduction which apply to the Standard Mail Flats
long. 89°35′16″ W.; II. Summary of Proposal Cost Model. Petition, Proposal Seven,
thence clockwise along a 2.5-NM arc III. Initial Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs Section One at 4. Two of the proposed
centered
at lat. 30°28′46″ N., long. 89°32′33″ W.; modifications also apply to the
to lat. 30°26′25″ N., long. 89°31′34″ W.;
I. Introduction Periodicals Model. Id.
to lat. 30°28′46″ N., long. 89°31′34″ W.; On August 5, 2015, the Postal Service 1. Revision of the Methodology Used To
thence counterclockwise along a 0.85-NM filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR Estimate the Proportion of Flats
arc centered 3050.11 requesting that the Commission
at lat. 30°28′46″ N., long. 89°32′33″ W.; Processed in Mechanized Incoming
initiate an informal rulemaking Secondary Operations (Modification
to lat. 30°29′37″ N., long. 89°32′33″ W.; proceeding to consider changes to
to the point of beginning. One)
Designated altitudes. 4,000 feet MSL to
analytical principles relating to the
Postal Service’s periodic reports.1 The Postal Service presents a process
10,000 feet MSL. to estimate the proportion of flat-shaped
Time of designation. Intermittent, 2000 to Proposal Seven is attached to the
0500 local time, as activated by NOTAM at Petition and proposes an analytical mail processed in mechanized incoming
least 24 hours in advance; and 1800 to 2000 method change relating to the avoided secondary operations. Id. at 4–8.
local time, November 1 to March 1, as costs for Flats Sequencing System (FSS) Although over 98 percent of flats
activated by NOTAM at least 24 hours in workshare discounts. Petition at 1. destinate in the service territories of
advance, not to exceed 20 days per year. This Petition was filed in response to plants that have mechanized equipment,
Controlling agency. FAA, Houston ARTCC. Order No. 2472, which directed the certain facilities choose to perform the
Using agency. U.S. Navy, Commander, incoming secondary sortation manually
Postal Service ‘‘to file a proposed
Naval Special Warfare Command, Naval for a variety of reasons, including low
Special Warfare N31 Branch, Stennis Space methodology for determining the costs
avoided for the Presorted FSS volume, service commitments, and
Center, Bay St. Louis, MS.
workshare discounts, as described in the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
* * * * * Package Services Products and Related Mail
body of [Order No. 2472], within 90
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 10 Classification Changes, May 7, 2015, at 62 (Order
days of the date of [Order No. 2472].’’ 2 No. 2472).
2015. 3 The proposed changes to the Periodicals Flats
Gary A. Norek, 1 Petition of the United States Postal Service for
Mail Processing Cost Model were filed in Docket
Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed No. RM2015–18. See Docket No. RM2015–18,
Group. Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Seven), Petition of the United States Postal Service for the
August 5, 2015 (Petition). Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed
[FR Doc. 2015–20277 Filed 8–14–15; 8:45 am] 2 Docket No. R2015–4, Order on Revised Price Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Nine),
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Adjustments for Standard Mail, Periodicals, and August 5, 2015, Attachment at 2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:52 Aug 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM 17AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_49342/page/1.svg)
![49186 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 158 / Monday, August 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
2. Comments are due no later than Postal Service’s periodic reports.1 100, rather than via manual processing.
September 25, 2015. Reply comments Proposal Nine is attached to the Petition Id.
are due no later than October 16, 2015. and proposes an analytical method According to the Postal Service,
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the change relating to bottom-up costs for because the processing of Carrier Route
Commission appoints Katalin K. new Periodicals Mail Carrier Route pallets and other 5-Digit pallets does not
Clendenin to serve as an officer of the bundle and container entry options. differ, it proposes no changes to the
Commission (Public Representative) to Petition at 1. This Petition was filed in methodology used to produce estimates
represent the interests of the general response to Order No. 2472, which of avoided costs. Id. The Postal Service
public in this docket. directed the Postal Service to ‘‘. . . file represents that the changes it proposes
4. The Secretary shall arrange for a proposed methodology for to the USPS–FY14–11 Periodicals
publication of this Order in the Federal determining the bottom-up costs for the Model in Docket No. ACR2014
Register. new Periodicals Mail Carrier Route explicitly identify the costs avoided. Id.
By the Commission. bundle and container entry options, as Further, the Postal Service states that it
Ruth Ann Abrams, described in the body of [Order No. has incorporated Modifications 1 and 9,
2472], within 90 days of the date of described in Section One of Proposal
Acting Secretary.
[Order No. 2472].’’ 2 Seven,3 into the Periodicals Model filed
[FR Doc. 2015–20232 Filed 8–14–15; 8:45 am]
with the Petition as an Excel
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P II. Summary of Proposal spreadsheet. Id.
Under Proposal Nine, the Postal
III. Initial Commission Action
Service asserts that no changes to the
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION methodology used to produce avoided The Commission establishes Docket
cost estimates for Periodicals Mail No. RM2015–18 for consideration of
39 CFR Part 3050
Carrier Route bundle and container matters raised by the Petition.
[Docket No. RM2015–18; Order No. 2655] entry options is necessary and instead Additional information concerning the
proposes changes to the model Petition may be accessed via the
Periodic Reporting presentation that explicitly identify the Commission’s Web site at http://
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. bottom-up costs of processing Carrier www.prc.gov. Interested persons may
Route pallets. Petition, Proposal Nine at submit comments on the Petition and
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
1, 2. Proposal Nine no later than September
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a When a mailing has sufficient density 8, 2015. Reply comments are due no
recent Postal Service filing requesting to prepare 5-Digit or 5-Digit Scheme later than September 22, 2015. Pursuant
that the Commission initiate an informal pallets, the mailer presorts nearly all of to 39 U.S.C. 505, Lawrence Fenster is
rulemaking proceeding to consider the mail on the pallet into Carrier Route designated as officer of the Commission
changes to analytical principles relating bundles. Id. at 1. The Postal Service (Public Representative) to represent the
to periodic reports (Proposal Nine). This represents that in Fiscal Year 2014, only interests of the general public in this
notice informs the public of the filing, one-half of one percent of the proceeding.
invites public comment, and takes other periodicals on such pallets were IV. Ordering Paragraphs
administrative steps. prepared in 5-Digit bundles. Id. The
Postal Service states that the 5-Digit It is ordered:
DATES: Comments are due: September 8,
mail on these pallets generally consists 1. The Commission establishes Docket
2015. Reply Comments are due: No. RM2015–18 for consideration of the
September 22, 2015. of residual pieces for the few routes that
lack sufficient density to qualify for matters raised by the Petition of the
ADDRESSES: Submit comments United States Postal Service for the
electronically via the Commission’s Carrier Route rates. Id.
The Postal Service represents that for Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider
Filing Online system at http:// Proposed Changes in Analytical
this reason it processes Carrier Route
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit Principles (Proposal Nine), filed August
pallets (5-Digit or 5-Digit Scheme pallets
comments electronically should contact 5, 2015.
containing only Carrier Route bundles)
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER 2. Comments are due no later than
identically to other 5-Digit pallets. Id. at
INFORMATION CONTACT section by September 8, 2015. Reply comments are
1–2. The Postal Service explains that all
telephone for advice on filing due no later than September 22, 2015.
pallets are cross-docked to the delivery
alternatives. 3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
unit for distribution of bundles to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commission appoints Lawrence Fenster
carriers. Id. at 2. The Postal Service
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at to serve as officer of the Commission
states that the Carrier Route pallet rate
202–789–6820. (Public Representative) to represent the
encourages mailers to prepare Carrier
interests of the general public in this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Route pallets and to move any residual
docket.
5-Digit bundles to containers that would 4. The Secretary shall arrange for
Table of Contents
be distributed in the plant. Id. The publication of this order in the Federal
I. Introduction Postal Service represents this enables it
II. Summary of Proposal Register.
to process the residual 5-Digit bundles
III. Initial Commission Action on the Automated Flats Sorting Machine By the Commission.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Ordering Paragraphs Ruth Ann Abrams,
I. Introduction 1 Petition of the United States Postal Service for Acting Secretary.
the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed [FR Doc. 2015–20233 Filed 8–14–15; 8:45 am]
On August 5, 2015, the Postal Service Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Nine),
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR August 5, 2015 (Petition).
2 Docket No. R2015–4, Order on Revised Price
3050.11 requesting that the Commission
Adjustments for Standard Mail, Periodicals, and 3 Petition of the United States Postal Service for
initiate an informal rulemaking Package Services Products and Related Mail the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed
proceeding to consider changes to Classification Changes, May 7, 2015, at 63 (Order Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Seven),
analytical principles relating to the No. 2472). August 5, 2015 (Proposal Seven).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:52 Aug 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM 17AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_49342/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 11:06:54
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 11:06:54
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | Comments are due: September 25, 2015. Reply Comments are due: October 16, 2015. | |
| Contact | David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 49184 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR