80 FR 49911 - Safety Zones; Eighth Coast Guard District Annual and Recurring Safety Zones Update

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 159 (August 18, 2015)

Page Range		49911-49913
FR Document		2015-20250

The Coast Guard is amending and updating its current list of recurring safety zone regulations that take place in the Eighth Coast Guard District area of responsibility (AOR). This final rule informs the public of regularly scheduled events that require additional safety measures through establishing a safety zone. Through this final rule, the list of recurring safety zones is updated with revisions, additional events, and removal of events that no longer take place in the Eighth Coast Guard District AOR. When these safety zones are enforced, vessel traffic is restricted from specified areas. Additionally, this one rulemaking project reduces administrative costs involved in producing a separate rule for each individual recurring safety zone and serves to provide notice of the known recurring safety zones throughout the year.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 159 (Tuesday, August 18, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 159 (Tuesday, August 18, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49911-49913]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20250]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2013-1060; 1625-AA00]


Safety Zones; Eighth Coast Guard District Annual and Recurring 
Safety Zones Update

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending and updating its current list of 
recurring safety zone regulations that take place in the Eighth Coast 
Guard District area of responsibility (AOR). This final rule informs 
the public of regularly scheduled events that require additional safety 
measures through establishing a safety zone. Through this final rule, 
the list of recurring safety zones is updated with revisions, 
additional events, and removal of events that no longer take place in 
the Eighth Coast Guard District AOR. When these safety zones are 
enforced, vessel traffic is restricted from specified areas. 
Additionally, this one rulemaking project reduces administrative costs 
involved in producing a separate rule for each individual recurring 
safety zone and serves to provide notice of the known recurring safety 
zones throughout the year.

DATES: This rule is effective August 18, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of Docket 
Number [USCG-2013-1060]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' 
Click on ``Open Docket Folder'' on the line associated with this 
rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room 
W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West 
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Shelley R. Miller, Eighth Coast Guard District Waterways 
Management Division, (504) 671-2139 or email, 
Shelley.R.Miller@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket, 
call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-
366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms

BNM Broadcast Notice to Mariners
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LNM Local Notice to Mariners
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard preceded this final rule with an interim final rule 
with request for comments. The interim rule was published in the 
Federal Register on April 22, 2014, [79 FR 22398]. The interim rule 
established separate tables for each of the Sectors operating within 
the Coast Guard's Eighth District and updated the list of recurring 
safety zones under 33 CFR 165. Although no adverse comments were 
received, some comments to further update the recurring list were 
received. Because the interim rule and now this final rule establish 
separate tables for each Sector within the Eighth District, further 
updates will now be made by each Sector individually, impacting only 
their table of recurring safety zones.
    The list of annual and recurring safety zones occurring in the 
Eighth Coast Guard District AOR is published under 33 CFR 165.801. That 
list was originally created May 16, 2012 through a previous rulemaking, 
[77 FR 2876] and received no adverse comments.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; and Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast 
Guard to define regulatory safety zones. The Coast Guard is amending 
and updating the safety zone regulations under 33 CFR part 165 to 
include the most up to date list of recurring safety zones for events 
held on or around navigable waters within the Eighth Coast Guard 
District. These events include air shows, fireworks displays, and other 
marine related events requiring a limited access area restricting 
vessel traffic for safety purposes. The list under 33 CFR 165.801 
requires amending to provide new information on existing safety zones, 
and updating to include new safety zones expected to recur annually or 
biannually and to remove safety

[[Page 49912]]

zones that are no longer required. Issuing individual regulations for 
each new safety zone, amendment, or removal of an existing safety zone 
creates unnecessary administrative costs and burdens. This single 
rulemaking considerably reduces administrative overhead and provides 
the public with notice through publication in the Federal Register of 
the upcoming recurring safety zone regulations.

C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule

    No adverse comments were received. Some comments regarding further 
updates to the recurring list were received. Because the interim rule 
and now this final rule establish separate tables for each Sector 
within the Eighth District, further updates will now be made by each 
sector individually, impacting only their table of recurring safety 
zones.
    No changes to the rule have been made from the interim rule and 
request for comments.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    This rule establishes safety zones limiting access to certain areas 
under 33 CFR 165 within the Eighth Coast Guard District. The effect of 
this rulemaking will not be significant because these safety zones are 
limited in scope and duration.
    Additionally, the public is given advance notification through 
local forms of notice, the Federal Register, and/or Notices of 
Enforcement and thus will be able to plan operations around the safety 
zones in advance. Deviation from the safety zones established through 
this rulemaking may be requested from the appropriate COTP and requests 
will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    This rule may affect the following entities, some of which might be 
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit 
the safety zone areas during periods of enforcement. The safety zones 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities because they are limited in scope and will be in effect 
for short periods of time. Before the enforcement period, the Coast 
Guard COTP will issue maritime advisories widely available to waterway 
users. Deviation from the safety zones established through this 
rulemaking may be requested from the appropriate COTP and requests will 
be considered on a case-by-case basis.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined 
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

[[Page 49913]]

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined 
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule is categorically excluded from further review 
under section 2.B.2 figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g) of the Commandant 
Instruction because it involves the establishment of safety zones. An 
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion 
determination are available in the docket where indicated under the 
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    Accordingly, the interim rule amending 33 CFR part 165 that 
published at 79 FR 22398 on April 22, 2014, is adopted as a final rule 
without change.

    Dated: July 27, 2015.
D.R. Callahan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015-20250 Filed 8-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

49912 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 159 / Tuesday, August 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

zones that are no longer required. 2. Impact on Small Entities 4. Collection of Information
Issuing individual regulations for each This rule will not call for a new
new safety zone, amendment, or The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, collection of information under the
removal of an existing safety zone Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
creates unnecessary administrative costs requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small U.S.C. 3501–3520).
and burdens. This single rulemaking
considerably reduces administrative entities during rulemaking. The term 5. Federalism
overhead and provides the public with ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small A rule has implications for federalism
notice through publication in the businesses, not-for-profit organizations under Executive Order 13132,
Federal Register of the upcoming that are independently owned and Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
recurring safety zone regulations. operated and are not dominant in their effect on the States, on the relationship
fields, and governmental jurisdictions between the national government and
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes with populations of less than 50,000.
and the Final Rule the States, or on the distribution of
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. power and responsibilities among the
No adverse comments were received. 605(b) that this rule will not have a various levels of government. We have
Some comments regarding further significant economic impact on a analyzed this rule under that Order and
updates to the recurring list were substantial number of small entities. determined that this rule does not have
received. Because the interim rule and This rule may affect the following implications for federalism.
now this final rule establish separate entities, some of which might be small 6. Protest Activities
tables for each Sector within the Eighth entities: The owners or operators of
District, further updates will now be vessels intending to transit the safety The Coast Guard respects the First
made by each sector individually, zone areas during periods of Amendment rights of protesters.
impacting only their table of recurring enforcement. The safety zones will not Protesters are asked to contact the
safety zones. have a significant economic impact on person listed in the FOR FURTHER
a substantial number of small entities INFORMATION CONTACT section to
No changes to the rule have been
because they are limited in scope and coordinate protest activities so that your
made from the interim rule and request
will be in effect for short periods of message can be received without
for comments.
time. Before the enforcement period, the jeopardizing the safety or security of
D. Regulatory Analyses Coast Guard COTP will issue maritime people, places or vessels.
We developed this rule after advisories widely available to waterway 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
considering numerous statutes and users. Deviation from the safety zones
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
executive orders related to rulemaking. established through this rulemaking of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Below we summarize our analyses may be requested from the appropriate Federal agencies to assess the effects of
based on a number of these statutes or COTP and requests will be considered their discretionary regulatory actions. In
executive orders. on a case-by-case basis. particular, the Act addresses actions
1. Regulatory Planning and Review 3. Assistance for Small Entities that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
This rule is not a significant Under section 213(a) of the Small aggregate, or by the private sector of
regulatory action under section 3(f) of Business Regulatory Enforcement $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), more in any one year. Though this rule
Planning and Review, as supplemented we want to assist small entities in will not result in such an expenditure,
by Executive Order 13563, Improving understanding this rule. If the rule we do discuss the effects of this rule
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and would affect your small business, elsewhere in this preamble.
does not require an assessment of organization, or governmental
8. Taking of Private Property
potential costs and benefits under jurisdiction and you have questions
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 concerning its provisions or options for This rule will not cause a taking of
or under section 1 of Executive Order compliance, please contact the person private property or otherwise have
13563. The Office of Management and listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION taking implications under Executive
Budget has not reviewed it under those CONTACT, above. Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Orders. Interference with Constitutionally
Small businesses may send comments
This rule establishes safety zones Protected Property Rights.
on the actions of Federal employees
limiting access to certain areas under 33 who enforce, or otherwise determine 9. Civil Justice Reform
CFR 165 within the Eighth Coast Guard compliance with, Federal regulations to This rule meets applicable standards
District. The effect of this rulemaking the Small Business and Agriculture in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
will not be significant because these Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
safety zones are limited in scope and and the Regional Small Business minimize litigation, eliminate
duration. Regulatory Fairness Boards. The ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Additionally, the public is given Ombudsman evaluates these actions
advance notification through local forms annually and rates each agency’s 10. Protection of Children
of notice, the Federal Register, and/or responsiveness to small business. If you We have analyzed this rule under
Notices of Enforcement and thus will be wish to comment on actions by Executive Order 13045, Protection of
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES

able to plan operations around the employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– Children from Environmental Health
safety zones in advance. Deviation from 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
the safety zones established through this Coast Guard will not retaliate against an economically significant rule and
rulemaking may be requested from the small entities that question or complain does not create an environmental risk to
appropriate COTP and requests will be about this rule or any policy or action health or risk to safety that may
considered on a case-by-case basis. of the Coast Guard. disproportionately affect children.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:22 Aug 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM 18AUR1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 159 / Tuesday, August 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 49913

11. Indian Tribal Governments ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Protection Agency, Air Planning and
AGENCY Development Branch, 11201 Renner
This rule does not have tribal Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
implications under Executive Order 40 CFR Part 52 913–551–7147, or by email at
13175, Consultation and Coordination bhesania.amy@epa.gov.
with Indian Tribal Governments, [EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0602; FRL–9932–39–
Region 7] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
because it does not have a substantial Throughout this document ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’,
direct effect on one or more Indian Approval and Promulgation of or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
tribes, on the relationship between the Implementation Plans; State of provides additional information by
Federal Government and Indian tribes, Missouri, Controlling Emissions addressing the following:
or on the distribution of power and During Episodes of High Air Pollution
responsibilities between the Federal I. What is being addressed in this document?
Potential II. Have the requirements for approval of a
Government and Indian tribes. SIP revision been met?
AGENCY: Environmental Protection III. EPA’s Response to Comments
12. Energy Effects
Agency (EPA). IV. What action is EPA taking?
This action is not a ‘‘significant ACTION: Final rule.
I. What is being addressed in this
energy action’’ under Executive Order
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection document?
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Agency (EPA) is taking final action to EPA is taking final action to approve
Distribution, or Use. approve a revision to the State a revision to the Missouri SIP received
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by by EPA on December 17, 2013,
13. Technical Standards the State of Missouri and received by pertaining to Missouri regulation 10
This rule does not use technical EPA on December 17, 2013, pertaining CSR 10–6.130, ‘‘Controlling Emissions
standards. Therefore, we did not to Missouri’s regulation ‘‘Controlling During Episodes of High Air Pollution
consider the use of voluntary consensus Emissions During Episodes of High Air Potential.’’ This regulation specifies
standards. Pollution Potential.’’ This regulation conditions that establish air pollution
specifies conditions that establish air alerts and emergency alert levels, and
14. Environment pollution alerts and emergency alert associated procedures and emission
levels, and associated procedures and reduction objectives statewide. This
We have analyzed this rule under
emission reduction objectives statewide. action revises the SIP by amending an
Department of Homeland Security
This action revises the SIP by amending existing table in the regulation,
Management Directive 023–01 and
an existing table in the regulation, clarifying requirements of the regulation
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
clarifying requirements of the regulation related to emission reduction plans and
which guide the Coast Guard in other provisions, and makes
complying with the National related to emission reduction plans and
other provisions, and makes administrative and format changes all
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 consistent with Federal regulations.
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and administrative and format changes, all
consistent with Federal regulations. EPA proposed approval of this rule on
have determined that this action is one November 4, 2014 at 79 FR 65362.
of a category of actions that do not DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 17, 2015. Specifically, in subsection (1)(A), the
individually or cumulatively have a regulation is being revised to clarify the
significant effect on the human ADDRESSES: EPA has established a applicability of the regulation to all
environment. This rule is categorically docket for this action under Docket ID sources and premises throughout the
excluded from further review under No. EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0602. All entire state with emissions of sulfur
section 2.B.2 figure 2–1, paragraph 34(g) documents in the docket are listed on dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO),
of the Commandant Instruction because the www.regulations.gov Web site. ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) or
it involves the establishment of safety Although listed in the index, some Particulate Matter—10 Micron (PM10)
zones. An environmental analysis information is not publicly available, and 2.5 Micron (PM2.5) that contribute to
checklist and a categorical exclusion i.e., CBI or other information whose the air quality levels in the state. This
determination are available in the disclosure is restricted by statute. clarification is consistent with federal
docket where indicated under the Certain other material, such as regulations regarding prevention of air
ADDRESSES. copyrighted material, is not placed on pollution emergency episodes found in
the Internet and will be publicly 40 CFR part 51, subpart H.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
available only in hard copy form. In addition, specific terms in this
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Publicly available docket materials are regulation that were previously defined
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping available either electronically through in section (2) have now been removed
requirements, Security measures, www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at and placed in Missouri regulation 10
Waterways. the Environmental Protection Agency, CSR 10–6.020, ‘‘Definitions and
Air Planning and Development Branch, Common Reference Tables.’’
Accordingly, the interim rule 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa,
amending 33 CFR part 165 that In section (3) of the regulation, table
Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s A is being amended to remove the
published at 79 FR 22398 on April 22, official hours of business are Monday
2014, is adopted as a final rule without specific breakpoint values for each
through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., relevant pollutant but retains the Air
change. excluding Federal holidays. The Quality Index (AQI) range values and
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES

Dated: July 27, 2015. interested persons wanting to examine categories for each pollutant. Because
D.R. Callahan, these documents should make an the AQI breakpoint values are updated
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, appointment with the office at least 24 each time a National Ambient Air
Eighth Coast Guard District. hours in advance. Quality Standard (NAAQS) is revised,
[FR Doc. 2015–20250 Filed 8–17–15; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: removing these values from the table
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P Amy Bhesania, Environmental eliminates unnecessary updates to this

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:22 Aug 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM 18AUR1

Document Created: 2015-12-15 12:04:31
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 12:04:31

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective August 18, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Shelley R. Miller, Eighth Coast Guard District Waterways Management Division, (504) 671-2139 or email, [email protected] If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202- 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 49911
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 49911 - Safety Zones; Eighth Coast Guard District Annual and Recurring Safety Zones Update

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 159 (August 18, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard