80_FR_50169 80 FR 50010 - Pilot Program for Medical Device Reporting on Malfunctions

80 FR 50010 - Pilot Program for Medical Device Reporting on Malfunctions

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 159 (August 18, 2015)

Page Range50010-50013
FR Document2015-20309

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is soliciting nominations for participation in a pilot program for the submission of medical device reports for malfunctions of class I devices and certain class II devices in summary format on a quarterly basis. Under the Medical Device Reporting on Malfunctions pilot program, FDA intends to work with manufacturers to identify candidates for the pilot program and intends to continue to accept nominations until candidates for the pilot program have been selected.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 159 (Tuesday, August 18, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 159 (Tuesday, August 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50010-50013]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-2918]


Pilot Program for Medical Device Reporting on Malfunctions

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is soliciting 
nominations for participation in a pilot program for the submission of 
medical device reports for malfunctions of class I devices and certain 
class II devices in summary format on a quarterly basis. Under the 
Medical Device Reporting on Malfunctions pilot program, FDA intends to 
work with manufacturers to identify candidates for the pilot program 
and intends to continue to accept nominations until candidates for the 
pilot program have been selected.

DATES: FDA will begin accepting nominations for participation in the 
voluntary pilot program on September 1, 2015, and intends to continue 
to accept nominations until candidates for the pilot program have been 
selected. See section II for instructions on how to participate in the 
voluntary pilot program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William C. Maloney, Center for Devices 
and Radiological Health, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3236, 
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA) 
(Pub. L. 110-85), amended section 519(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360i(a)), relating to the 
reporting of device malfunctions to FDA under part 803 (21 CFR part 
803). Specifically, FDAAA amended the FD&C Act to require that medical 
device reports of malfunctions for class I devices and those class II 
devices that are not permanently implantable, life supporting, or life 
sustaining--with the exception of any type of class I or II device 
which FDA has, by notice, published in the Federal Register or by 
letter to the person who is the manufacturer or importer of the device, 
indicated should be subject to part 803 in order to protect the public 
health--be submitted in accordance with the criteria established by FDA 
(section 519(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act).\1\ The criteria must 
require the reports to be in summary form and made on a quarterly basis 
(section 519(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In light of section 1003(d) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 
393(d)) and the Secretary of Health and Human Services' (the 
Secretary's) delegation to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 
statutory references to ``the Secretary'' have been changed to 
``FDA'' or the ``Agency'' in this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FDA is considering the development of malfunction reporting 
criteria for devices subject to section 519(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the FD&C 
Act. In the interim, FDA clarified that all manufacturers of class I 
devices and those class II devices that are not permanently 
implantable, life supporting, or life sustaining, must continue to 
report in full compliance with part 803 (76 FR 12743 at 12744, March 8, 
2011).
    The malfunction reporting requirements for class III devices and 
those class II devices that are permanently implantable, life 
supporting, or life sustaining were not altered by FDAAA. Under the 
amended section 519(a) of the FD&C Act, device manufacturers are to 
continue to submit malfunction reports in accordance with part 803 for 
all class III devices and for those class II devices that are 
permanently implantable, life supporting, or life sustaining, unless 
FDA grants an exemption or variance from, or an alternative to, a 
requirement under such regulations under Sec.  803.19 (section 
519(a)(1)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act).
    In addition, under section 519(a) of the FD&C Act, as amended by 
FDAAA, there is no change to the obligation for an importer to submit 
malfunction reports to the manufacturer in accordance with part 803 for 
devices that it imports into the United States (section 
519(a)(1)(B)(iii) of the FD&C Act).
    FDA intends to use the information learned and experiences gained 
from the pilot program to develop the malfunction reporting criteria 
for devices subject to section 519(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act.

II. Pilot Program for Medical Device Reporting (MDR) on Malfunctions

    FDA has developed this pilot program for manufacturers interested 
in submitting malfunction reports for certain devices in a summary 
format on a quarterly basis. This notice provides:

[[Page 50011]]

(1) The guiding principles underlying the pilot program, (2) the 
conditions for participation in the pilot program, (3) a description of 
the pilot program, (4) the eligibility criteria for the pilot program, 
(5) the procedures that FDA intends to follow in the pilot program, (6) 
the manufacturer notification process, (7) FDA's review process for the 
summary reports, (8) the duration of the pilot program, and (9) FDA's 
evaluation process for the pilot program.

A. Guiding Principles

    The following basic principles underlie the Medical Device 
Reporting on Malfunctions pilot program described in this notice. FDA 
intends for these principles to create a common understanding between 
the manufacturer and FDA about the goals and parameters of this pilot 
program.
    1. FDA is exploring a possible approach to summary reporting of 
device malfunctions on a quarterly basis under the pilot program (as 
illustrated in the case examples in this notice in section II.C. 
Description of the Program) that would allow FDA to collect sufficient 
detail to effectively monitor the devices subject to section 
519(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act and protect the public health.
    2. The data received in this pilot should contain details 
sufficient to understand the device-related malfunctions. A narrative 
text should be provided to include a summary of the malfunction events, 
the results of the manufacturer's investigation of the reported 
malfunctions, including the type of any remedial action taken or an 
explanation of why remedial action was not taken, and any additional 
information that would be helpful to understand how the manufacturer 
addressed the malfunctions summarized in the report.
    3. As the summary information collected under this pilot represents 
a subset of the detailed information collected under Sec.  803.52, FDA 
intends to use the existing electronic Medical Device Reporting (eMDR) 
infrastructure for the summary reports.
    4. All summary MDR reports \2\ will appear in the Manufacturer and 
User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, which is publically 
available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Any information in the report that is protected from public 
disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) will be 
redacted prior to the release of the report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Conditions

    1. Under Sec.  803.19, manufacturers who are accepted into the 
program will be granted an exemption or variance from, or alternative 
to, the reporting requirements under Sec. Sec.  803.50(a) and 803.52 
for those malfunction events associated with the devices selected for 
the pilot. Other reportable events involving the devices selected for 
the pilot must be reported to FDA within the mandatory 30-calendar day 
timeframe on Form FDA 3500A, as required by Sec. Sec.  803.50(a) and 
803.52, or within the 5-work day timeframe as required by Sec.  803.53. 
Additional information and instructions will be provided to 
manufacturers accepted into the pilot.
    2. A candidate is not precluded from withdrawing from the pilot 
program at any time and returning to the individual reporting 
requirements of Sec. Sec.  803.50(a) and 803.52.
    3. Due to FDA resource issues, FDA intends to limit the pilot 
program to no more than nine (9) candidates.
    4. At its discretion, FDA may withdraw a manufacturer from the 
pilot program, for reasons including, but not limited to, any 
violations of the FD&C Act, failure to follow the instructions of the 
pilot program, or if FDA obtains information after the manufacturer is 
accepted to the pilot program that the manufacturer is not an 
appropriate candidate for the program as described in this notice in 
section II.D. Appropriate Candidates. Withdrawal from the pilot program 
will result in a return to the individual reporting requirements of 
Sec. Sec.  803.50(a) and 803.52.
    5. At its discretion, FDA may modify specific details regarding the 
pilot if needed. Any such changes will be communicated directly to the 
candidates of the pilot program.

C. Description of the Program

    Candidates of the pilot program will submit Form FDA 3500A reports 
in electronic reporting format on a quarterly basis. For purposes of 
the pilot, ``quarterly basis'' is defined as a three (3) month period. 
Each submission should represent a summary of malfunction events 
received for a unique device problem code or set of codes within the 
quarterly timeframe, and for a particular device model number and/or 
catalog number. Device malfunctions that are summarized in one report 
should not be duplicated in any other submissions within the same 
quarterly timeframe.
    Summary reports should include the following information collected 
on Form FDA 3500A in electronic format:
    SECTION B.5: Describe Event or Problem--The device event narrative 
should include a description of the nature of the events (being as 
specific as possible); and if available, a range of patient age and 
weight, and a breakdown of patient gender. The first sentence of the 
device event narrative should include the following sentence:
    ``This report summarizes  XXX  malfunction events'' 
where XXX is replaced by the number of malfunction events being 
summarized.
    SECTION D.2 and D.2.b: Common Device Name and Procode--Enter the 
common name of the device and the product code.
    SECTION D.3: Manufacturer Name, City and State--Enter the 
manufacturer name, city and state where the manufacturer is located.
    SECTION D.4: Device Identification--Enter the model or catalog 
number for the device being summarized in the MDR report.
    SECTION G.1: Contact Office (and Manufacturing Site for Devices)--
Enter the name and address of the manufacturer reporting site [contact 
office], including contact name for the report submitted. Enter the 
name and address of the manufacturing site for the device, if different 
from the contact office.
    SECTION G.2: Phone Number--Enter the phone number for the contact 
office.
    SECTION H.1: Type of Reportable Event--Check ``Malfunction'' in 
this box.
    SECTION H.6: Event Problem and Evaluation Codes--Enter the device 
problem code(s), including any codes received from a user facility or 
importer report provided in Section F.10 of Form FDA 3500A. Enter 
``9999'' as the first device problem code to identify the report as a 
summary malfunction report. Enter the evaluation code(s) for the 
categories of method, results, and conclusions. Enter a conclusion 
code(s) even if the device was not evaluated.
    SECTION H.10: Additional Manufacturer Narrative--Provide a summary 
of the results of your investigation of the reported malfunctions, 
including the type of any remedial action taken or an explanation of 
why remedial action was not taken, and any additional information that 
would be helpful to understand how you addressed the malfunction events 
summarized in the report. Also enter a breakdown of the malfunction 
events summarized in the report, including the number of devices that 
were returned to you; the number of devices that were labeled for 
single use (if any); and the number of devices that were reprocessed 
and re-used (if any).

    Note: All reportable adverse events which result in a serious 
injury or death; and/or necessitate remedial action to prevent an 
unreasonable risk of substantial harm to the public health, are 
excluded from this pilot program. In addition, for reference here is 
the

[[Page 50012]]

link to the on-line version of the Form FDA 3500A: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Forms/UCM048334.pdf.

    Case Examples: The following examples are meant to illustrate the 
format for how malfunction reports submitted under this pilot will be 
captured. All of these examples are for class I devices and those class 
II devices that are not permanently implantable, life supporting, or 
life sustaining. These examples do not address interpretation of these 
reportable events.
    Case Scenario #1: Multiple malfunction reports for the same device 
problem. A manufacturer receives 50 similar reports within the 
quarterly timeframe indicating that model XYZ pump experienced an air 
detected set alarm, which interrupted delivery. The alarms may have 
been a false alarm. These events were received from various sources. Of 
the 50 adverse events, 46 did not involve patients, and 4 involved 
patients with no reported injuries or deaths. None of these events 
necessitate remedial action to prevent an unreasonable risk of 
substantial harm to the public health. The XYZ pumps were recently 
retrofitted with a new user interface software model V.2.04.12.
    Report for Case #1: A single summary MDR report is to be submitted 
to FDA through eMDR:
     B.5: This report summarizes  50  malfunction 
events. A review of the events indicated that model XYZ pump 
experienced an air detected set alarm, which interrupted delivery. The 
alarms may have been a false alarm. These reports were received from 
various sources. Of the 50 events, 46 did not involve patients, and 4 
involved patients with no patient consequences. The four patients 
ranged from 25-32 years of age and 130-250 lbs. Of the reported 
patients, one was male and three were female. The XYZ pumps were 
recently retrofitted with a new user interface software model 
V.2.04.12.
     D.2: Infusion Pump
     D.2.b: FRN
     D.3: ABC Company, 123 Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, USA
     D.4: Model XYZ
     G.1: Mr. X, ABC company, 123 Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, 
USA
     G.2: 301-555-0001
     H.1: Malfunction
     H.6: Device Codes: 9999 (Summary Malfunction); 1008 (Air 
Leak)
     H.6: Manufacturer Method Codes: 10 (Actual Device 
Evaluated); 38 (Visual Inspection)
     H.6: Manufacturer Results Code: 549 (Air pump assembly)
     H.6: Manufacturer Evaluation Conclusion Codes: 52 (Device 
was out of calibration)
     H.10: For 40 of the 50 reported events, the devices were 
returned to ABC, and their operating condition was confirmed by 
service. The cause of the malfunction was determined to be a faulty 
pump head module. To correct the condition, the pump head modules were 
replaced.
    Case Scenario #2: Multiple malfunction reports that have two device 
problems: A manufacturer receives 100 malfunction reports within the 
quarterly timeframe that include two types of device malfunctions that 
are related to a specific model (XYZ, Version 2) of a powered AC bed: 
(1) 75 events involve a broken weld near where the motor attaches; and 
(2) 55 events involve a screw that attaches the bed rail to the 
mounting bracket on the bed, which snapped. Some of the events involve 
both types of device malfunctions. None of the events involve patients. 
None of the events necessitate remedial action to prevent an 
unreasonable risk of substantial harm to the public health.
    Reports for Case #2: Under this pilot, a unique device problem code 
or set of codes for a particular device model number and/or catalog 
number that are summarized in one report should not be duplicated in 
any other submissions within the same quarterly timeframe. As a result, 
there are three categories of reports for this scenario--(1) 45 events 
that involve broken welds only; (2) 25 events that involve broken 
screws only; and (3) 30 events that involve both broken welds and 
broken screws. Therefore, three summary reports will need to be 
submitted to FDA through eMDR.
    Report #1:
     B.5: This report summarizes  45  malfunction 
events. A review of the events indicated that model XYZ experienced 
broken welds near where the motor attaches to the powered AC beds. No 
patients were involved.
     D.2: AC Powered Beds
     D.2.b: FNL
     D.3: ABC company, 123 Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, USA
     D.4: Model XYZ
     G.1: Mr. X, ABC Company, 123 Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, 
USA
     G.2: 301-555-0001
     H.1: Malfunction
     H.6: Device Codes: 9999 (Summary Malfunction); 1069 
(Break); 3195 (Weld)
     H.6: Manufacturer Method Codes: 10 (Actual Device 
Evaluated); 38 (Visual Inspection)
     H.6: Manufacturer Results Code: 170 (Manufacturing process 
problem)
     H.6: Manufacturer Evaluation Conclusion Codes: 12 (Design 
deficiency)
     H.10: To correct the condition, the beds were taken out of 
service.
    Report #2:
     B.5: This report summarizes  25  malfunction 
events. A review of the events indicated that a screw that attaches the 
bed rail to the mounting bracket on the bed is snapping on model XYZ. 
No patients were involved.
     D.2: AC Powered Beds
     D.2.b: FNL
     D.3: ABC company, 123 Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, USA
     D.4: Model XYZ
     G.1: Mr. X, ABC Company, 123 Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, 
USA
     G.2: 301-555-0001
     H.1: Malfunction
     H.6: Device Codes: 9999 (Summary Malfunction); 1069 
(Break); 568 (Screw)
     H.6: Manufacturer Method Codes: 10 (Actual Device 
Evaluated); 38 (Visual Inspection)
     H.6: Manufacturer Results Code: 170 (Manufacturing process 
problem)
     H.6: Manufacturer Evaluation Conclusion Codes: 12 (Design 
deficiency)
     H.10: To correct the condition, the beds were taken out of 
service temporarily. A technician was dispatched to replace the screw. 
Load testing was applied to verify bed rail performance.
    Report #3:
     B.5: This report summarizes  30  malfunction 
events. A review of the events indicated that a screw that attaches the 
bed rail to the mounting bracket on the AC powered bed failed causing 
the bed rail to detach and collide with the beam near where the motor 
attaches. The force of impact caused a broken weld to form near the 
motor attachment on the AC powered bed. No patients were involved.
     D.2: AC Powered Beds
     D.2.b: FNL
     D.3: ABC Company, 123 Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, USA
     D.4: Model XYZ
     G.1: Mr. X., ABC Company, 123 Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, 
USA
     G.2: 301-555-0001
     H.1: Malfunction
     H.6: Device Codes: 9999 (Summary Malfunction); 1069 
(Break); 3195 (Screw); 568 (Weld)
     H.6: Manufacturer Method Codes: 10 (Actual Device 
Evaluated); 38 (Visual Inspection)
     H.6: Manufacturer Results Code: 170 (Manufacturing process 
problem)

[[Page 50013]]

     H.6: Manufacturer Evaluation Conclusion Codes: 12 (Design 
deficiency)
     H.10: To correct the condition, the beds were taken out of 
service. Technicians have examined the beds and have opened up a 
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) to address the design issue.

D. Appropriate Candidates

    Appropriate candidates for the pilot program are manufacturers who:
    1. Are currently submitting reports to FDA using the paper Form FDA 
3500A or the electronic MDR (eMDR) format.
    2. Manufacture class I devices and/or those class II devices that 
are not permanently implantable, life supporting, or life sustaining.
    3. Currently use or are willing to use eMDR to submit summary 
malfunction reports to the FDA during the pilot period.
    4. Are in compliance with the Medical Device Reporting regulation 
in 21 CFR part 803.

E. Procedures

1. Nomination
    A manufacturer of class I devices and those class II devices that 
are not permanently implantable, life supporting, or life sustaining 
may nominate themselves for participation in the pilot program by 
submitting a nomination to [email protected]. FDA intends to 
acknowledge receipt of nominations via return email. The following 
information will assist FDA in processing and responding to 
nominations:
     Name of manufacturer
     Registration number
     Contact name, address, phone number, and email address
     Model or catalog number for the device(s) that you are 
requesting to include in the pilot, and
     Product classification code for the device(s) that you are 
requesting to include in the pilot. You may access the Product 
Classification Code database at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPCD/classification.cfm.
2. FDA Consideration
    Acceptance of nominations will start 2 weeks following the 
publication date of this Federal Register notice. Because only a 
limited number of candidates are needed, FDA will use its discretion in 
choosing candidates based on the eligibility criteria in this Federal 
Register notice in section II.D. Appropriate Candidates, the needs of 
the pilot to include a diversity of manufacturers with regard to device 
type (including in vitro diagnostic devices), and expected number of 
malfunction events. FDA may contact the manufacturer to request 
supplemental information if this information is needed in order to 
complete our review of the request. The manufacturer must provide the 
supplemental information within 15 days of FDA's request; otherwise, 
the Agency will consider the nomination withdrawn.

F. Manufacturer Notification

    FDA intends to notify manufacturers who are selected for this pilot 
program within 45 days from receiving their nomination or any 
supplemental information requested by FDA. Once FDA has selected the 
candidates for this pilot, FDA will notify subsequent applicants by 
email that the nomination period has closed.

G. FDA Review

    All reports received under the pilot program will be reviewed and 
processed in the same manner as individual medical device reports that 
are submitted under part 803. A version of the report releasable under 
FOIA will be accessible through the public MAUDE database.

H. Duration of the Pilot

    FDA intends for the pilot program to run for 2 calendar quarters 
for each candidate and will continue until the 2 calendar quarters have 
been completed for all candidates. At its discretion, FDA may terminate 
the pilot program before the close of this period, or FDA may extend 
the pilot program beyond the 2 calendar quarters. The decision to 
terminate or extend the pilot will be announced in the Federal 
Register.

I. Evaluation

    FDA intends to evaluate all information and feedback received from 
the candidates and to use the information and experiences gained from 
the pilot program to develop criteria for summary reporting on a 
quarterly basis for devices subject to section 519(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the 
FD&C Act.

III. Paper Reduction Act of 1995

    This notice refers to previously approved collections of 
information that are subject to review by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520). The collections of information in 21 CFR part 803 have been 
approved under OMB control number 0910-0437; the collections of 
information in Form FDA 3500A have been approved under OMB control 
number 0910-0291.

    Dated: August 12, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-20309 Filed 8-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P



                                                    50010                        Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 159 / Tuesday, August 18, 2015 / Notices

                                                    reflects recent developments in                           Dated: August 12, 2015.                             published in the Federal Register or by
                                                    scientific information that pertain to                  Leslie Kux,                                           letter to the person who is the
                                                    drugs being developed for the treatment                 Associate Commissioner for Policy.                    manufacturer or importer of the device,
                                                    of uncomplicated gonorrhea.                             [FR Doc. 2015–20306 Filed 8–17–15; 8:45 am]           indicated should be subject to part 803
                                                                                                                                                                  in order to protect the public health—
                                                       Issuance of this guidance fulfills a                 BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
                                                                                                                                                                  be submitted in accordance with the
                                                    portion of the requirements of Title VIII,
                                                                                                                                                                  criteria established by FDA (section
                                                    section 804, of the Food and Drug                                                                             519(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act).1 The
                                                    Administration Safety and Innovation                    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                                                                            HUMAN SERVICES                                        criteria must require the reports to be in
                                                    Act (Pub. L. 112–144), which requires                                                                         summary form and made on a quarterly
                                                    FDA to review and, as appropriate,                      Food and Drug Administration                          basis (section 519(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the
                                                    revise not fewer than three guidance                                                                          FD&C Act).
                                                    documents per year for the conduct of                   [Docket No. FDA–2015–N–2918]
                                                                                                                                                                     FDA is considering the development
                                                    clinical trials with respect to                         Pilot Program for Medical Device                      of malfunction reporting criteria for
                                                    antibacterial and antifungal drugs.                     Reporting on Malfunctions                             devices subject to section 519(a)(1)(B)(ii)
                                                       This guidance is being issued                                                                              of the FD&C Act. In the interim, FDA
                                                    consistent with FDA’s good guidance                     AGENCY:    Food and Drug Administration,              clarified that all manufacturers of class
                                                                                                            HHS.                                                  I devices and those class II devices that
                                                    practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
                                                                                                            ACTION:   Notice.                                     are not permanently implantable, life
                                                    The guidance represents the current
                                                                                                                                                                  supporting, or life sustaining, must
                                                    thinking of FDA on developing drugs for                 SUMMARY:   The Food and Drug                          continue to report in full compliance
                                                    the treatment of uncomplicated                          Administration (FDA) is soliciting                    with part 803 (76 FR 12743 at 12744,
                                                    gonorrhea. It does not establish any                    nominations for participation in a pilot              March 8, 2011).
                                                    rights for any person and is not binding                program for the submission of medical                    The malfunction reporting
                                                    on FDA or the public. You can use an                    device reports for malfunctions of class              requirements for class III devices and
                                                    alternative approach if it satisfies the                I devices and certain class II devices in             those class II devices that are
                                                    requirements of the applicable statutes                 summary format on a quarterly basis.                  permanently implantable, life
                                                    and regulations.                                        Under the Medical Device Reporting on                 supporting, or life sustaining were not
                                                                                                            Malfunctions pilot program, FDA                       altered by FDAAA. Under the amended
                                                    II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
                                                                                                            intends to work with manufacturers to                 section 519(a) of the FD&C Act, device
                                                    1995                                                    identify candidates for the pilot program             manufacturers are to continue to submit
                                                      This guidance refers to previously                    and intends to continue to accept                     malfunction reports in accordance with
                                                    approved collections of information that                nominations until candidates for the                  part 803 for all class III devices and for
                                                    are subject to review by the Office of                  pilot program have been selected.                     those class II devices that are
                                                    Management and Budget (OMB) under                       DATES: FDA will begin accepting                       permanently implantable, life
                                                                                                            nominations for participation in the                  supporting, or life sustaining, unless
                                                    the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
                                                                                                            voluntary pilot program on September                  FDA grants an exemption or variance
                                                    (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collections
                                                                                                            1, 2015, and intends to continue to                   from, or an alternative to, a requirement
                                                    of information in 21 CFR parts 312 and
                                                                                                            accept nominations until candidates for               under such regulations under § 803.19
                                                    314 have been approved under OMB                                                                              (section 519(a)(1)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act).
                                                    control numbers 0910–0014 and 0910–                     the pilot program have been selected.
                                                                                                            See section II for instructions on how to                In addition, under section 519(a) of
                                                    0001, respectively.                                                                                           the FD&C Act, as amended by FDAAA,
                                                                                                            participate in the voluntary pilot
                                                    III. Comments                                           program.                                              there is no change to the obligation for
                                                                                                                                                                  an importer to submit malfunction
                                                                                                            FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                       Interested persons may submit either                                                                       reports to the manufacturer in
                                                                                                            William C. Maloney, Center for Devices                accordance with part 803 for devices
                                                    electronic comments regarding this
                                                                                                            and Radiological Health, 10903 New                    that it imports into the United States
                                                    document to http://www.regulations.gov
                                                                                                            Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3236,                   (section 519(a)(1)(B)(iii) of the FD&C
                                                    or written comments to the Division of
                                                                                                            Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,                         Act).
                                                    Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It                  227pilot@fda.hhs.gov.
                                                    is only necessary to send one set of                                                                             FDA intends to use the information
                                                                                                            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            learned and experiences gained from the
                                                    comments. Identify comments with the
                                                    docket number found in brackets in the                  I. Background                                         pilot program to develop the
                                                    heading of this document. Received                                                                            malfunction reporting criteria for
                                                                                                              The Food and Drug Administration                    devices subject to section 519(a)(1)(B)(ii)
                                                    comments may be seen in the Division                    Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA)                        of the FD&C Act.
                                                    of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.                    (Pub. L. 110–85), amended section
                                                    and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday and                   519(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and                 II. Pilot Program for Medical Device
                                                    will be posted to the docket at http://                 Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.                Reporting (MDR) on Malfunctions
                                                    www.regulations.gov.                                    360i(a)), relating to the reporting of                   FDA has developed this pilot program
                                                                                                            device malfunctions to FDA under part                 for manufacturers interested in
                                                    IV. Electronic Access
                                                                                                            803 (21 CFR part 803). Specifically,                  submitting malfunction reports for
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                      Persons with access to the Internet                   FDAAA amended the FD&C Act to                         certain devices in a summary format on
                                                    may obtain the document at either                       require that medical device reports of                a quarterly basis. This notice provides:
                                                    http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/                               malfunctions for class I devices and
                                                    GuidanceCompliance/                                     those class II devices that are not                      1 In light of section 1003(d) of the FD&C Act (21

                                                                                                            permanently implantable, life                         U.S.C. 393(d)) and the Secretary of Health and
                                                    RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/                                                                              Human Services’ (the Secretary’s) delegation to the
                                                    default.htm or http://                                  supporting, or life sustaining—with the               Commissioner of Food and Drugs, statutory
                                                    www.regulations.gov.                                    exception of any type of class I or II                references to ‘‘the Secretary’’ have been changed to
                                                                                                            device which FDA has, by notice,                      ‘‘FDA’’ or the ‘‘Agency’’ in this document.



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:02 Aug 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00026   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM   18AUN1


                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 159 / Tuesday, August 18, 2015 / Notices                                               50011

                                                    (1) The guiding principles underlying                   requirements under §§ 803.50(a) and                   breakdown of patient gender. The first
                                                    the pilot program, (2) the conditions for               803.52 for those malfunction events                   sentence of the device event narrative
                                                    participation in the pilot program, (3) a               associated with the devices selected for              should include the following sentence:
                                                    description of the pilot program, (4) the               the pilot. Other reportable events                      ‘‘This report summarizes <NOE> XXX
                                                    eligibility criteria for the pilot program,             involving the devices selected for the                </NOE> malfunction events’’ where
                                                    (5) the procedures that FDA intends to                  pilot must be reported to FDA within                  XXX is replaced by the number of
                                                    follow in the pilot program, (6) the                    the mandatory 30-calendar day                         malfunction events being summarized.
                                                    manufacturer notification process, (7)                  timeframe on Form FDA 3500A, as                         SECTION D.2 and D.2.b: Common
                                                    FDA’s review process for the summary                    required by §§ 803.50(a) and 803.52, or               Device Name and Procode—Enter the
                                                    reports, (8) the duration of the pilot                  within the 5-work day timeframe as                    common name of the device and the
                                                    program, and (9) FDA’s evaluation                       required by § 803.53. Additional                      product code.
                                                    process for the pilot program.                          information and instructions will be                    SECTION D.3: Manufacturer Name,
                                                                                                            provided to manufacturers accepted into               City and State—Enter the manufacturer
                                                    A. Guiding Principles                                                                                         name, city and state where the
                                                                                                            the pilot.
                                                      The following basic principles                          2. A candidate is not precluded from                manufacturer is located.
                                                    underlie the Medical Device Reporting                   withdrawing from the pilot program at                   SECTION D.4: Device Identification—
                                                    on Malfunctions pilot program                           any time and returning to the individual              Enter the model or catalog number for
                                                    described in this notice. FDA intends                   reporting requirements of §§ 803.50(a)                the device being summarized in the
                                                    for these principles to create a common                 and 803.52.                                           MDR report.
                                                    understanding between the                                 3. Due to FDA resource issues, FDA                    SECTION G.1: Contact Office (and
                                                    manufacturer and FDA about the goals                    intends to limit the pilot program to no              Manufacturing Site for Devices)—Enter
                                                    and parameters of this pilot program.                   more than nine (9) candidates.                        the name and address of the
                                                      1. FDA is exploring a possible                          4. At its discretion, FDA may                       manufacturer reporting site [contact
                                                    approach to summary reporting of                        withdraw a manufacturer from the pilot                office], including contact name for the
                                                    device malfunctions on a quarterly basis                program, for reasons including, but not               report submitted. Enter the name and
                                                    under the pilot program (as illustrated                 limited to, any violations of the FD&C                address of the manufacturing site for the
                                                    in the case examples in this notice in                  Act, failure to follow the instructions of            device, if different from the contact
                                                    section II.C. Description of the Program)               the pilot program, or if FDA obtains                  office.
                                                    that would allow FDA to collect                         information after the manufacturer is                   SECTION G.2: Phone Number—Enter
                                                    sufficient detail to effectively monitor                accepted to the pilot program that the                the phone number for the contact office.
                                                    the devices subject to section                          manufacturer is not an appropriate                      SECTION H.1: Type of Reportable
                                                    519(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act and                    candidate for the program as described                Event—Check ‘‘Malfunction’’ in this
                                                    protect the public health.                              in this notice in section II.D.                       box.
                                                      2. The data received in this pilot                    Appropriate Candidates. Withdrawal                      SECTION H.6: Event Problem and
                                                    should contain details sufficient to                    from the pilot program will result in a               Evaluation Codes—Enter the device
                                                    understand the device-related                           return to the individual reporting                    problem code(s), including any codes
                                                    malfunctions. A narrative text should be                requirements of §§ 803.50(a) and 803.52.              received from a user facility or importer
                                                    provided to include a summary of the                      5. At its discretion, FDA may modify                report provided in Section F.10 of Form
                                                    malfunction events, the results of the                  specific details regarding the pilot if               FDA 3500A. Enter ‘‘9999’’ as the first
                                                    manufacturer’s investigation of the                     needed. Any such changes will be                      device problem code to identify the
                                                    reported malfunctions, including the                    communicated directly to the                          report as a summary malfunction report.
                                                    type of any remedial action taken or an                 candidates of the pilot program.                      Enter the evaluation code(s) for the
                                                    explanation of why remedial action was                                                                        categories of method, results, and
                                                    not taken, and any additional                           C. Description of the Program                         conclusions. Enter a conclusion code(s)
                                                    information that would be helpful to                      Candidates of the pilot program will                even if the device was not evaluated.
                                                    understand how the manufacturer                         submit Form FDA 3500A reports in                        SECTION H.10: Additional
                                                    addressed the malfunctions summarized                   electronic reporting format on a                      Manufacturer Narrative—Provide a
                                                    in the report.                                          quarterly basis. For purposes of the                  summary of the results of your
                                                      3. As the summary information                         pilot, ‘‘quarterly basis’’ is defined as a            investigation of the reported
                                                    collected under this pilot represents a                 three (3) month period. Each submission               malfunctions, including the type of any
                                                    subset of the detailed information                      should represent a summary of                         remedial action taken or an explanation
                                                    collected under § 803.52, FDA intends                   malfunction events received for a                     of why remedial action was not taken,
                                                    to use the existing electronic Medical                  unique device problem code or set of                  and any additional information that
                                                    Device Reporting (eMDR) infrastructure                  codes within the quarterly timeframe,                 would be helpful to understand how
                                                    for the summary reports.                                and for a particular device model                     you addressed the malfunction events
                                                      4. All summary MDR reports 2 will                     number and/or catalog number. Device                  summarized in the report. Also enter a
                                                    appear in the Manufacturer and User                     malfunctions that are summarized in                   breakdown of the malfunction events
                                                    Facility Device Experience (MAUDE)                      one report should not be duplicated in                summarized in the report, including the
                                                    database, which is publically available.                any other submissions within the same                 number of devices that were returned to
                                                    B. Conditions                                           quarterly timeframe.                                  you; the number of devices that were
                                                                                                              Summary reports should include the
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                  labeled for single use (if any); and the
                                                      1. Under § 803.19, manufacturers who                  following information collected on                    number of devices that were
                                                    are accepted into the program will be                   Form FDA 3500A in electronic format:                  reprocessed and re-used (if any).
                                                    granted an exemption or variance from,                    SECTION B.5: Describe Event or
                                                    or alternative to, the reporting                                                                                Note: All reportable adverse events which
                                                                                                            Problem—The device event narrative                    result in a serious injury or death; and/or
                                                      2 Any information in the report that is protected
                                                                                                            should include a description of the                   necessitate remedial action to prevent an
                                                    from public disclosure under the Freedom of
                                                                                                            nature of the events (being as specific as            unreasonable risk of substantial harm to the
                                                    Information Act (FOIA) will be redacted prior to the    possible); and if available, a range of               public health, are excluded from this pilot
                                                    release of the report.                                  patient age and weight, and a                         program. In addition, for reference here is the



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:02 Aug 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00027   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM   18AUN1


                                                    50012                        Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 159 / Tuesday, August 18, 2015 / Notices

                                                    link to the on-line version of the Form FDA                • H.6: Manufacturer Evaluation                       • H.6: Manufacturer Results Code:
                                                    3500A: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/                    Conclusion Codes: 52 (Device was out of               170 (Manufacturing process problem)
                                                    AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Forms/                     calibration)                                            • H.6: Manufacturer Evaluation
                                                    UCM048334.pdf.
                                                                                                               • H.10: For 40 of the 50 reported                  Conclusion Codes: 12 (Design
                                                       Case Examples: The following                         events, the devices were returned to                  deficiency)
                                                    examples are meant to illustrate the                    ABC, and their operating condition was                  • H.10: To correct the condition, the
                                                    format for how malfunction reports                      confirmed by service. The cause of the                beds were taken out of service.
                                                    submitted under this pilot will be                      malfunction was determined to be a                      Report #2:
                                                    captured. All of these examples are for                 faulty pump head module. To correct                     • B.5: This report summarizes <NOE>
                                                    class I devices and those class II devices              the condition, the pump head modules                  25 </NOE> malfunction events. A
                                                    that are not permanently implantable,                   were replaced.                                        review of the events indicated that a
                                                    life supporting, or life sustaining. These                 Case Scenario #2: Multiple                         screw that attaches the bed rail to the
                                                    examples do not address interpretation                  malfunction reports that have two                     mounting bracket on the bed is
                                                    of these reportable events.                             device problems: A manufacturer                       snapping on model XYZ. No patients
                                                       Case Scenario #1: Multiple                           receives 100 malfunction reports within               were involved.
                                                    malfunction reports for the same device                 the quarterly timeframe that include two                • D.2: AC Powered Beds
                                                    problem. A manufacturer receives 50                     types of device malfunctions that are                   • D.2.b: FNL
                                                    similar reports within the quarterly                    related to a specific model (XYZ,                       • D.3: ABC company, 123 Baker
                                                    timeframe indicating that model XYZ                     Version 2) of a powered AC bed: (1) 75                Street, Anywhere, MD, USA
                                                    pump experienced an air detected set                    events involve a broken weld near                       • D.4: Model XYZ
                                                    alarm, which interrupted delivery. The                  where the motor attaches; and (2) 55                    • G.1: Mr. X, ABC Company, 123
                                                    alarms may have been a false alarm.                     events involve a screw that attaches the              Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, USA
                                                    These events were received from                         bed rail to the mounting bracket on the                 • G.2: 301–555–0001
                                                    various sources. Of the 50 adverse                      bed, which snapped. Some of the events                  • H.1: Malfunction
                                                    events, 46 did not involve patients, and                involve both types of device                            • H.6: Device Codes: 9999 (Summary
                                                    4 involved patients with no reported                    malfunctions. None of the events                      Malfunction); 1069 (Break); 568 (Screw)
                                                    injuries or deaths. None of these events                involve patients. None of the events                    • H.6: Manufacturer Method Codes:
                                                    necessitate remedial action to prevent                  necessitate remedial action to prevent                10 (Actual Device Evaluated); 38 (Visual
                                                    an unreasonable risk of substantial harm                an unreasonable risk of substantial harm              Inspection)
                                                                                                                                                                    • H.6: Manufacturer Results Code:
                                                    to the public health. The XYZ pumps                     to the public health.
                                                                                                                                                                  170 (Manufacturing process problem)
                                                    were recently retrofitted with a new                       Reports for Case #2: Under this pilot,
                                                                                                                                                                    • H.6: Manufacturer Evaluation
                                                    user interface software model V.2.04.12.                a unique device problem code or set of
                                                                                                                                                                  Conclusion Codes: 12 (Design
                                                       Report for Case #1: A single summary                 codes for a particular device model
                                                                                                                                                                  deficiency)
                                                    MDR report is to be submitted to FDA                    number and/or catalog number that are
                                                                                                                                                                    • H.10: To correct the condition, the
                                                    through eMDR:                                           summarized in one report should not be
                                                                                                                                                                  beds were taken out of service
                                                       • B.5: This report summarizes <NOE>                  duplicated in any other submissions
                                                                                                                                                                  temporarily. A technician was
                                                    50 </NOE> malfunction events. A                         within the same quarterly timeframe. As
                                                                                                                                                                  dispatched to replace the screw. Load
                                                    review of the events indicated that                     a result, there are three categories of
                                                                                                                                                                  testing was applied to verify bed rail
                                                    model XYZ pump experienced an air                       reports for this scenario—(1) 45 events
                                                                                                                                                                  performance.
                                                    detected set alarm, which interrupted                   that involve broken welds only; (2) 25                  Report #3:
                                                    delivery. The alarms may have been a                    events that involve broken screws only;                 • B.5: This report summarizes <NOE>
                                                    false alarm. These reports were received                and (3) 30 events that involve both                   30 </NOE> malfunction events. A
                                                    from various sources. Of the 50 events,                 broken welds and broken screws.                       review of the events indicated that a
                                                    46 did not involve patients, and 4                      Therefore, three summary reports will                 screw that attaches the bed rail to the
                                                    involved patients with no patient                       need to be submitted to FDA through                   mounting bracket on the AC powered
                                                    consequences. The four patients ranged                  eMDR.                                                 bed failed causing the bed rail to detach
                                                    from 25–32 years of age and 130–250                        Report #1:                                         and collide with the beam near where
                                                    lbs. Of the reported patients, one was                     • B.5: This report summarizes <NOE>                the motor attaches. The force of impact
                                                    male and three were female. The XYZ                     45 </NOE> malfunction events. A                       caused a broken weld to form near the
                                                    pumps were recently retrofitted with a                  review of the events indicated that                   motor attachment on the AC powered
                                                    new user interface software model                       model XYZ experienced broken welds                    bed. No patients were involved.
                                                    V.2.04.12.                                              near where the motor attaches to the                    • D.2: AC Powered Beds
                                                       • D.2: Infusion Pump                                 powered AC beds. No patients were                       • D.2.b: FNL
                                                       • D.2.b: FRN                                         involved.                                               • D.3: ABC Company, 123 Baker
                                                       • D.3: ABC Company, 123 Baker                           • D.2: AC Powered Beds                             Street, Anywhere, MD, USA
                                                    Street, Anywhere, MD, USA                                  • D.2.b: FNL                                         • D.4: Model XYZ
                                                       • D.4: Model XYZ                                        • D.3: ABC company, 123 Baker                        • G.1: Mr. X., ABC Company, 123
                                                       • G.1: Mr. X, ABC company, 123                       Street, Anywhere, MD, USA                             Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, USA
                                                    Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, USA                            • D.4: Model XYZ                                     • G.2: 301–555–0001
                                                       • G.2: 301–555–0001                                     • G.1: Mr. X, ABC Company, 123                       • H.1: Malfunction
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                       • H.1: Malfunction                                   Baker Street, Anywhere, MD, USA                         • H.6: Device Codes: 9999 (Summary
                                                       • H.6: Device Codes: 9999 (Summary                      • G.2: 301–555–0001                                Malfunction); 1069 (Break); 3195
                                                    Malfunction); 1008 (Air Leak)                              • H.1: Malfunction                                 (Screw); 568 (Weld)
                                                       • H.6: Manufacturer Method Codes:                       • H.6: Device Codes: 9999 (Summary                   • H.6: Manufacturer Method Codes:
                                                    10 (Actual Device Evaluated); 38 (Visual                Malfunction); 1069 (Break); 3195 (Weld)               10 (Actual Device Evaluated); 38 (Visual
                                                    Inspection)                                                • H.6: Manufacturer Method Codes:                  Inspection)
                                                       • H.6: Manufacturer Results Code:                    10 (Actual Device Evaluated); 38 (Visual                • H.6: Manufacturer Results Code:
                                                    549 (Air pump assembly)                                 Inspection)                                           170 (Manufacturing process problem)


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:02 Aug 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00028   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM   18AUN1


                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 159 / Tuesday, August 18, 2015 / Notices                                                 50013

                                                      • H.6: Manufacturer Evaluation                        type (including in vitro diagnostic                   been approved under OMB control
                                                    Conclusion Codes: 12 (Design                            devices), and expected number of                      number 0910–0291.
                                                    deficiency)                                             malfunction events. FDA may contact                     Dated: August 12, 2015.
                                                      • H.10: To correct the condition, the                 the manufacturer to request                           Leslie Kux,
                                                    beds were taken out of service.                         supplemental information if this
                                                                                                                                                                  Associate Commissioner for Policy.
                                                    Technicians have examined the beds                      information is needed in order to
                                                                                                                                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–20309 Filed 8–17–15; 8:45 am]
                                                    and have opened up a Corrective and                     complete our review of the request. The
                                                    Preventive Action (CAPA) to address                     manufacturer must provide the                         BILLING CODE 4164–01–P

                                                    the design issue.                                       supplemental information within 15
                                                                                                            days of FDA’s request; otherwise, the
                                                    D. Appropriate Candidates                                                                                     DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                                                                            Agency will consider the nomination
                                                      Appropriate candidates for the pilot                                                                        HUMAN SERVICES
                                                                                                            withdrawn.
                                                    program are manufacturers who:                                                                                Food and Drug Administration
                                                      1. Are currently submitting reports to                F. Manufacturer Notification
                                                    FDA using the paper Form FDA 3500A                        FDA intends to notify manufacturers
                                                    or the electronic MDR (eMDR) format.                                                                          [Docket No. FDA–2014–D–0903]
                                                                                                            who are selected for this pilot program
                                                      2. Manufacture class I devices and/or                 within 45 days from receiving their                   Providing Submissions in Electronic
                                                    those class II devices that are not                     nomination or any supplemental                        Format—Postmarketing Safety Reports
                                                    permanently implantable, life                           information requested by FDA. Once                    for Vaccines; Guidance for Industry;
                                                    supporting, or life sustaining.                         FDA has selected the candidates for this              Availability
                                                      3. Currently use or are willing to use                pilot, FDA will notify subsequent
                                                    eMDR to submit summary malfunction                      applicants by email that the nomination               AGENCY:    Food and Drug Administration,
                                                    reports to the FDA during the pilot                     period has closed.                                    HHS.
                                                    period.                                                                                                       ACTION:   Notice.
                                                      4. Are in compliance with the                         G. FDA Review
                                                    Medical Device Reporting regulation in                    All reports received under the pilot                SUMMARY:    The Food and Drug
                                                    21 CFR part 803.                                        program will be reviewed and processed                Administration (FDA or Agency) is
                                                    E. Procedures                                           in the same manner as individual                      announcing the availability of a
                                                                                                            medical device reports that are                       document entitled ‘‘Providing
                                                    1. Nomination                                           submitted under part 803. A version of                Submissions in Electronic Format—
                                                      A manufacturer of class I devices and                 the report releasable under FOIA will be              Postmarketing Safety Reports for
                                                    those class II devices that are not                     accessible through the public MAUDE                   Vaccines; Guidance for Industry.’’ The
                                                    permanently implantable, life                           database.                                             guidance document provides
                                                    supporting, or life sustaining may                                                                            information and recommendations
                                                                                                            H. Duration of the Pilot                              pertaining to the electronic submission
                                                    nominate themselves for participation
                                                    in the pilot program by submitting a                      FDA intends for the pilot program to                of postmarketing safety reports
                                                    nomination to 227pilot@fda.hhs.gov.                     run for 2 calendar quarters for each                  involving vaccine products marketed for
                                                    FDA intends to acknowledge receipt of                   candidate and will continue until the 2               human use with approved biologics
                                                    nominations via return email. The                       calendar quarters have been completed                 license applications (BLAs), including
                                                    following information will assist FDA in                for all candidates. At its discretion, FDA            individual case safety reports (ICSRs)
                                                    processing and responding to                            may terminate the pilot program before                and attachments to ICSRs (ICSR
                                                    nominations:                                            the close of this period, or FDA may                  attachments), into the Vaccine Adverse
                                                      • Name of manufacturer                                extend the pilot program beyond the 2                 Event Reporting System (VAERS).
                                                      • Registration number                                 calendar quarters. The decision to                    VAERS is a national vaccine safety
                                                      • Contact name, address, phone                        terminate or extend the pilot will be                 surveillance program that is co-
                                                    number, and email address                               announced in the Federal Register.                    sponsored by the Centers for Disease
                                                      • Model or catalog number for the                                                                           Control and Prevention (CDC) and FDA.
                                                                                                            I. Evaluation                                         FDA published in the Federal Register
                                                    device(s) that you are requesting to
                                                    include in the pilot, and                                  FDA intends to evaluate all                        a final rule requiring that certain
                                                      • Product classification code for the                 information and feedback received from                postmarketing safety reports for human
                                                    device(s) that you are requesting to                    the candidates and to use the                         drug and biological products, including
                                                    include in the pilot. You may access the                information and experiences gained                    vaccines, be submitted to FDA in an
                                                    Product Classification Code database at                 from the pilot program to develop                     electronic format that the Agency can
                                                    http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/                  criteria for summary reporting on a                   process, review, and archive. The
                                                    cdrh/cfdocs/cfPCD/classification.cfm.                   quarterly basis for devices subject to                guidance is intended to help applicants
                                                                                                            section 519(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act.             required to submit postmarketing safety
                                                    2. FDA Consideration                                                                                          reports involving vaccine products to
                                                                                                            III. Paper Reduction Act of 1995                      comply with the final rule. The
                                                       Acceptance of nominations will start
                                                    2 weeks following the publication date                    This notice refers to previously                    guidance announced in this notice
                                                    of this Federal Register notice. Because                approved collections of information that              finalizes the draft guidance of the same
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    only a limited number of candidates are                 are subject to review by the Office of                title, dated July 2014, and supersedes
                                                    needed, FDA will use its discretion in                  Management and Budget (OMB) under                     the document entitled ‘‘Guidance for
                                                    choosing candidates based on the                        the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995                   Industry: How to Complete the Vaccine
                                                    eligibility criteria in this Federal                    (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collections                Adverse Event Report System Form
                                                    Register notice in section II.D.                        of information in 21 CFR part 803 have                (VAERS–1)’’ dated September 1998.
                                                    Appropriate Candidates, the needs of                    been approved under OMB control                       DATES: Submit either electronic or
                                                    the pilot to include a diversity of                     number 0910–0437; the collections of                  written comments on Agency guidances
                                                    manufacturers with regard to device                     information in Form FDA 3500A have                    at any time.


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:02 Aug 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00029   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM   18AUN1



Document Created: 2015-12-15 12:05:00
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 12:05:00
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
DatesFDA will begin accepting nominations for participation in the voluntary pilot program on September 1, 2015, and intends to continue to accept nominations until candidates for the pilot program have been selected. See section II for instructions on how to participate in the voluntary pilot program.
ContactWilliam C. Maloney, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3236, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, [email protected]
FR Citation80 FR 50010 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR