80_FR_50193 80 FR 50034 - Devra Hamilton, N.P.; Decision and Order

80 FR 50034 - Devra Hamilton, N.P.; Decision and Order

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 159 (August 18, 2015)

Page Range50034-50035
FR Document2015-20348

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 159 (Tuesday, August 18, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 159 (Tuesday, August 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50034-50035]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Devra Hamilton, N.P.; Decision and Order

    On November 24, 2014, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an 
Order to Show Cause to Devra Hamilton, N.P. (hereinafter, Respondent), 
of Las Vegas, Nevada. GX 1. The Show Cause Order proposed the 
revocation of Respondent's Certificate of Registration MH2194176, on 
the ground that she does not currently possess authority to handle 
controlled substances in Nevada, the State in which she is registered 
with the Agency. Id. at 1-2 (citing 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3)).
    The Show Cause Order specifically alleged that on January 16, 2014, 
the Nevada State Board of Nursing suspended Respondent's license as an 
Advance Practitioner of Nursing (APN), after she admitted that the 
Board had ``sufficient evidence to prove that [she] prescribed large 
amounts of unit doses of controlled substances between January 1, 2012 
and December 31, 2012, that [she] failed to adequately assess patients 
prior to prescribing controlled substances, and that [she] documented 
inaccurate and contradictory information in medical records.'' Id. at 1 
(citations omitted). The Show Cause Order further alleged that in March 
2014, the Nevada State Board of Pharmacy revoked her license to 
prescribe controlled substances based on the Nursing Board's suspension 
of her APN license. Id. The Order thus alleged that Respondent is 
``currently without authority to handle controlled substances'' in the 
State in which she is registered, and that her registration is 
therefore subject to revocation.\1\ Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Show Cause Order also notified Respondent of her right 
to request a hearing on the allegations or to submit a written 
statement in lieu of a hearing, the procedure for electing either 
option, and the consequence of failing to elect either option. Id. 
at 2 (citing 21 CFR 1301.43).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As evidenced by the signed return receipt card, on December 1, 
2014, Respondent was served with the Show Cause Order. GX 2. On January 
6, 2015, Respondent filed a letter (dated Jan. 2, 2015) which presented 
her position on the issues involved in the Nursing Board's proceeding. 
GX 3. Respondent did not, however, dispute that DEA ``must revoke'' her 
registration. Id. Nor did she request a hearing on the allegations of 
the Show Cause Order. Id.
    As explained above, under 21 CFR 1301.43(c), ``[a]ny person 
entitled to a hearing . . . may, within the period permitted for filing 
a request for a hearing or a notice of appearance, file with the 
Administrator a waiver of an opportunity for a hearing . . . together 
with a written statement regarding such person's position on the 
matters of fact and law involved in such hearing.'' However, DEA 
regulations require that the written statement be filed ``within 30 
days after the date of receipt of the'' Show Cause Order, 21 CFR 
1301.43(a), and specify that documents ``shall be dated and deemed 
filed upon receipt by the Hearing Clerk.'' Id. Sec.  1316.45. Thus, I 
find that Respondent's letter was untimely and do not consider it. I 
further find that Respondent has waived her right to a hearing.
    Thereafter, on January 28, 2015, the Government submitted a Request 
for Final Agency Action with accompanying documentation, including the 
Nursing Board's Order suspending her APN license and a printout from 
the Nevada State Board of Pharmacy showing the status of her state 
controlled substance license. I make the following findings of fact.

Findings

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556(e), I take official notice of Respondent's 
registration record with the Agency. According to that record, 
Respondent is currently registered as a mid-level practitioner, with 
authority to dispense controlled substances in schedules II through V, 
at the address of 9010 W. Cheyenne, Las Vegas, NV 89129. Respondent's 
registration does not expire under October 31, 2016.
    On January 8, 2014, Respondent entered into an ``Agreement for 
Probation and Suspension of [her] Advanced Practitioner of Nursing 
Certificate''; on January 16, 2014, the Board approved the agreement. 
Therein, Respondent denied the allegations raised by the Board, but 
admitted that ``the Board ha[d] sufficient evidence to prove that she 
prescribed large amounts of unit doses of controlled substances between 
January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012, that she failed to adequately 
assess patients prior to prescribing controlled substances, and that 
she documented inaccurate and contradictory information in medical 
records.'' GX 4, at 1. Respondent further agreed to the Board's 
issuance of a decision and order which suspended her Advanced 
Practitioner of Nursing Certificate ``for a minimum of one year.'' Id. 
at 3. According to the online records of the Board, Respondent's 
Advanced Practitioner of Nursing Certificate either expired on January 
16, 2014 or remains suspended as of this date. So too, her Board of 
Pharmacy license remains suspended as of this date.

Discussion

    The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) grants the Attorney General 
authority to revoke a registration ``upon a finding that the registrant 
. . . has had [her] State license or registration suspended [or] 
revoked . . . and is no longer authorized by State law to engage in the 
. . . distribution [or] dispensing of controlled substances.'' 21 
U.S.C. 824(a)(3). Moreover, DEA has long held that a practitioner must 
be currently authorized to handle controlled substances in the 
``jurisdiction in which [she] practices'' in order to maintain a DEA 
registration. See 21 U.S.C. 802(21) (``the term `practitioner' means a 
physician . . . or other person licensed, registered or otherwise 
permitted, by . . . the jurisdiction in which [she] practices . . . to 
distribute, dispense, [or] administer . . . a controlled substance in 
the course of professional practice.''); see also id. Sec.  823(f) 
(``The Attorney General shall register practitioners . . . to dispense 
. . . if the applicant is authorized to dispense . . . controlled 
substances under the laws of the State in which [she] practices.''). As 
these provisions make plain, possessing authority under state law to 
dispense controlled substances is an essential condition for holding a 
DEA registration. See David W. Wang, 72 FR 54297, 54298 (2007); Sheran 
Arden Yeates, 71 FR 39130, 39131 (2006); Dominick A. Ricci, 58 FR 
51104, 51105 (1993); Bobby Watts, 53 FR 11919, 11920 (1988).
    Here, the evidence shows that both Respondent's Advance 
Practitioner of Nursing Certificate and her state Controlled Substance 
License have been suspended by the Nevada State Board of Nursing and 
the Nevada State Board of Pharmacy respectively. I therefore hold that 
Respondent no longer possesses authority under Nevada law to dispense 
controlled substances and that she is

[[Page 50035]]

therefore not entitled to maintain her DEA registration. See 21 U.S.C. 
802(21), 823(f), and 824(a)(3). Accordingly, I will order that her 
registration be revoked.

Order

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 824(a), as well 
as 28 CFR 0.100(b), I order that DEA Certificate of Registration 
MH2194176 issued to Devra A. Hamilton, A.P.N., be, and it hereby is, 
revoked. I further order that any pending application of Devra A. 
Hamilton, A.P.N., to renew or modify her registration, be, and it 
hereby is, denied. This Order is effective September 17, 2015.

    Dated: August 10, 2015.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-20348 Filed 8-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P



                                                    50034                         Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 159 / Tuesday, August 18, 2015 / Notices

                                                    Order                                                       As evidenced by the signed return                    of unit doses of controlled substances
                                                                                                             receipt card, on December 1, 2014,                      between January 1, 2012 and December
                                                      Pursuant to the authority vested in me                 Respondent was served with the Show                     31, 2012, that she failed to adequately
                                                    by 21 U.S.C. 824(a), as well as 28 CFR                   Cause Order. GX 2. On January 6, 2015,                  assess patients prior to prescribing
                                                    0.100(b), I order that the Order to Show                 Respondent filed a letter (dated Jan. 2,                controlled substances, and that she
                                                    Cause issued to Jeffrey S. Holverson,                    2015) which presented her position on                   documented inaccurate and
                                                    M.D., be, and it hereby is, dismissed.                   the issues involved in the Nursing                      contradictory information in medical
                                                    This Order is effective immediately.                     Board’s proceeding. GX 3. Respondent                    records.’’ GX 4, at 1. Respondent further
                                                      Dated: August 10, 2015.                                did not, however, dispute that DEA                      agreed to the Board’s issuance of a
                                                    Chuck Rosenberg,                                         ‘‘must revoke’’ her registration. Id. Nor               decision and order which suspended
                                                    Acting Administrator.                                    did she request a hearing on the                        her Advanced Practitioner of Nursing
                                                    [FR Doc. 2015–20346 Filed 8–17–15; 8:45 am]              allegations of the Show Cause Order. Id.                Certificate ‘‘for a minimum of one year.’’
                                                                                                                As explained above, under 21 CFR                     Id. at 3. According to the online records
                                                    BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
                                                                                                             1301.43(c), ‘‘[a]ny person entitled to a                of the Board, Respondent’s Advanced
                                                                                                             hearing . . . may, within the period                    Practitioner of Nursing Certificate either
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                                    permitted for filing a request for a                    expired on January 16, 2014 or remains
                                                                                                             hearing or a notice of appearance, file                 suspended as of this date. So too, her
                                                    Drug Enforcement Administration                          with the Administrator a waiver of an                   Board of Pharmacy license remains
                                                                                                             opportunity for a hearing . . . together                suspended as of this date.
                                                    Devra Hamilton, N.P.; Decision and                       with a written statement regarding such
                                                    Order                                                                                                            Discussion
                                                                                                             person’s position on the matters of fact
                                                                                                             and law involved in such hearing.’’                        The Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
                                                       On November 24, 2014, the Deputy                      However, DEA regulations require that                   grants the Attorney General authority to
                                                    Assistant Administrator, Office of                       the written statement be filed ‘‘within                 revoke a registration ‘‘upon a finding
                                                    Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement                      30 days after the date of receipt of the’’              that the registrant . . . has had [her]
                                                    Administration (DEA), issued an Order                    Show Cause Order, 21 CFR 1301.43(a),                    State license or registration suspended
                                                    to Show Cause to Devra Hamilton, N.P.                    and specify that documents ‘‘shall be                   [or] revoked . . . and is no longer
                                                    (hereinafter, Respondent), of Las Vegas,                 dated and deemed filed upon receipt by                  authorized by State law to engage in the
                                                    Nevada. GX 1. The Show Cause Order                       the Hearing Clerk.’’ Id. § 1316.45. Thus,               . . . distribution [or] dispensing of
                                                    proposed the revocation of                               I find that Respondent’s letter was                     controlled substances.’’ 21 U.S.C.
                                                    Respondent’s Certificate of Registration                 untimely and do not consider it. I                      824(a)(3). Moreover, DEA has long held
                                                    MH2194176, on the ground that she                        further find that Respondent has waived                 that a practitioner must be currently
                                                    does not currently possess authority to                  her right to a hearing.                                 authorized to handle controlled
                                                    handle controlled substances in Nevada,                     Thereafter, on January 28, 2015, the                 substances in the ‘‘jurisdiction in which
                                                    the State in which she is registered with                Government submitted a Request for                      [she] practices’’ in order to maintain a
                                                    the Agency. Id. at 1–2 (citing 21 U.S.C.                 Final Agency Action with                                DEA registration. See 21 U.S.C. 802(21)
                                                    824(a)(3)).                                              accompanying documentation,                             (‘‘the term ‘practitioner’ means a
                                                       The Show Cause Order specifically                     including the Nursing Board’s Order                     physician . . . or other person licensed,
                                                                                                             suspending her APN license and a                        registered or otherwise permitted, by
                                                    alleged that on January 16, 2014, the
                                                                                                             printout from the Nevada State Board of                 . . . the jurisdiction in which [she]
                                                    Nevada State Board of Nursing
                                                                                                             Pharmacy showing the status of her                      practices . . . to distribute, dispense,
                                                    suspended Respondent’s license as an
                                                                                                             state controlled substance license. I                   [or] administer . . . a controlled
                                                    Advance Practitioner of Nursing (APN),
                                                                                                             make the following findings of fact.                    substance in the course of professional
                                                    after she admitted that the Board had
                                                                                                                                                                     practice.’’); see also id. § 823(f) (‘‘The
                                                    ‘‘sufficient evidence to prove that [she]                Findings                                                Attorney General shall register
                                                    prescribed large amounts of unit doses
                                                                                                                Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556(e), I take                  practitioners . . . to dispense . . . if the
                                                    of controlled substances between
                                                                                                             official notice of Respondent’s                         applicant is authorized to dispense . . .
                                                    January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012,
                                                                                                             registration record with the Agency.                    controlled substances under the laws of
                                                    that [she] failed to adequately assess                                                                           the State in which [she] practices.’’). As
                                                    patients prior to prescribing controlled                 According to that record, Respondent is
                                                                                                             currently registered as a mid-level                     these provisions make plain, possessing
                                                    substances, and that [she] documented                                                                            authority under state law to dispense
                                                    inaccurate and contradictory                             practitioner, with authority to dispense
                                                                                                             controlled substances in schedules II                   controlled substances is an essential
                                                    information in medical records.’’ Id. at                                                                         condition for holding a DEA
                                                    1 (citations omitted). The Show Cause                    through V, at the address of 9010 W.
                                                                                                             Cheyenne, Las Vegas, NV 89129.                          registration. See David W. Wang, 72 FR
                                                    Order further alleged that in March                                                                              54297, 54298 (2007); Sheran Arden
                                                    2014, the Nevada State Board of                          Respondent’s registration does not
                                                                                                             expire under October 31, 2016.                          Yeates, 71 FR 39130, 39131 (2006);
                                                    Pharmacy revoked her license to                                                                                  Dominick A. Ricci, 58 FR 51104, 51105
                                                                                                                On January 8, 2014, Respondent
                                                    prescribe controlled substances based                                                                            (1993); Bobby Watts, 53 FR 11919,
                                                                                                             entered into an ‘‘Agreement for
                                                    on the Nursing Board’s suspension of                                                                             11920 (1988).
                                                                                                             Probation and Suspension of [her]
                                                    her APN license. Id. The Order thus                                                                                 Here, the evidence shows that both
                                                                                                             Advanced Practitioner of Nursing
                                                    alleged that Respondent is ‘‘currently                                                                           Respondent’s Advance Practitioner of
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                             Certificate’’; on January 16, 2014, the
                                                    without authority to handle controlled                                                                           Nursing Certificate and her state
                                                                                                             Board approved the agreement. Therein,
                                                    substances’’ in the State in which she is                                                                        Controlled Substance License have been
                                                                                                             Respondent denied the allegations
                                                    registered, and that her registration is                                                                         suspended by the Nevada State Board of
                                                                                                             raised by the Board, but admitted that
                                                    therefore subject to revocation.1 Id. at 2.                                                                      Nursing and the Nevada State Board of
                                                                                                             ‘‘the Board ha[d] sufficient evidence to
                                                      1 The Show Cause Order also notified Respondent        prove that she prescribed large amounts                 Pharmacy respectively. I therefore hold
                                                    of her right to request a hearing on the allegations
                                                                                                                                                                     that Respondent no longer possesses
                                                    or to submit a written statement in lieu of a hearing,   consequence of failing to elect either option. Id. at   authority under Nevada law to dispense
                                                    the procedure for electing either option, and the        2 (citing 21 CFR 1301.43).                              controlled substances and that she is


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:02 Aug 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00050    Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM   18AUN1


                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 159 / Tuesday, August 18, 2015 / Notices                                                 50035

                                                    therefore not entitled to maintain her                  Administrator of the DEA Office of                        registration inconsistent with the public
                                                    DEA registration. See 21 U.S.C. 802(21),                Diversion Control (‘‘Deputy Assistant                     interest, the Show Cause Order alleged
                                                    823(f), and 824(a)(3). Accordingly, I will              Administrator’’) pursuant to section 7 of                 that Respondent violated federal law by
                                                    order that her registration be revoked.                 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R.                     issuing controlled substance
                                                                                                              In accordance with 21 CFR                               prescriptions when he ‘‘no longer
                                                    Order                                                   1301.33(a), this is notice that on March                  possessed a DEA registration.’’ Id. at 2
                                                      Pursuant to the authority vested in me                30, 2015, IRIX Manufacturing, Inc., 309                   (citing 21 CFR 1306.03(a)). More
                                                    by 21 U.S.C. 824(a), as well as 28 CFR                  Delaware Street, Building 1106,                           specifically, the Order alleged that on
                                                    0.100(b), I order that DEA Certificate of               Greenville, South Carolina 29605                          May 5, 2012, Respondent had issued a
                                                    Registration MH2194176 issued to                        applied to be registered as a bulk                        prescription for 60 tablets of Lyrica 75
                                                    Devra A. Hamilton, A.P.N., be, and it                   manufacturer of the following basic                       mg, a schedule V controlled substance,
                                                    hereby is, revoked. I further order that                classes of controlled substances:                         and on September 12, 2012, Respondent
                                                    any pending application of Devra A.                                                                               had issued a prescription for Zutripro
                                                    Hamilton, A.P.N., to renew or modify                           Controlled Substance                   Schedule    120 ml, a schedule III controlled
                                                    her registration, be, and it hereby is,                                                                           substance. Id.
                                                                                                            Marihuana (7360) .........................    I
                                                    denied. This Order is effective                                                                                       The Show Cause Order also alleged
                                                                                                            Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370) .....            I
                                                    September 17, 2015.                                                                                               that from July 11, 2011 through
                                                      Dated: August 10, 2015.                                 The company plans to manufacture                        November 4, 2011, Respondent
                                                    Chuck Rosenberg,                                        the above-listed controlled substances                    ‘‘dispensed controlled substances on
                                                    Acting Administrator.                                   as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient                       behalf of Care Plus Medical Group
                                                    [FR Doc. 2015–20348 Filed 8–17–15; 8:45 am]             (API) for clinical trials.                                (CPMG), a purported pain management
                                                                                                              Dated: August 10, 2015.                                 clinic formerly located in Creve Coeur,
                                                    BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
                                                                                                            Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
                                                                                                                                                                      Missouri, [which] was owned by Scott
                                                                                                                                                                      Whitney.’’ Id. The Order alleged that
                                                                                                            Deputy Assistant Administrator.
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                                                                                             prior to beginning his employment with
                                                                                                            [FR Doc. 2015–20285 Filed 8–17–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                                      CPMG, Respondent arranged with
                                                                                                            BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
                                                    Drug Enforcement Administration                                                                                   Whitney to order schedule II controlled
                                                                                                                                                                      substances under his previous
                                                    [Docket No. DEA–392]
                                                                                                                                                                      registration and that ‘‘[t]o that end, . . .
                                                                                                            DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                    Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled                                                                                   Whitney sent 20 DEA 222 forms to
                                                    Substances Application: IRIX                            Drug Enforcement Administration                           [Respondent’s] residence, and asked
                                                    Manufacturing, Inc.                                                                                               that [he] pre-sign them so that
                                                                                                            Arthur H. Bell, D.O.; Decision and                        controlled substances could be ordered
                                                    ACTION:   Notice of application.                        Order                                                     on behalf of CPMG.’’ Id. The Order then
                                                                                                                                                                      alleged that Respondent ‘‘pre-signed the
                                                    DATES:  Registered bulk manufacturers of                  On July 15, 2014, the Deputy                            forms, dated them . . . and mailed them
                                                    the affected basic classes, and                         Assistant Administrator, Office of                        to . . . Whitney . . . [who] then used one
                                                    applicants therefore, may file written                  Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
                                                                                                                                                                      . . . to place orders for oxycodone 30 mg
                                                    comments on or objections to the                        Administration, issued an Order to
                                                                                                                                                                      and oxycodone 10/325 mg.’’ Id. The
                                                    issuance of the proposed registration in                Show Cause to Arthur H. Bell, D.O.
                                                                                                                                                                      Order alleged that this violated federal
                                                    accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on                    (Respondent), of Covington, Kentucky.
                                                                                                                                                                      law because it ‘‘authoriz[ed] . . .
                                                    or before October 19, 2015.                             GX 1, at 1. The Show Cause Order
                                                                                                                                                                      Whitney to place an order for controlled
                                                                                                            proposed the denial of Respondent’s
                                                    ADDRESSES: Written comments should                                                                                substances under [Respondent’s]
                                                                                                            application for a DEA Certificate of
                                                    be sent to: Drug Enforcement                                                                                      previous . . . registration without
                                                                                                            Registration as a practitioner on
                                                    Administration, Attention: DEA Federal                                                                            executing a power of attorney for . . .
                                                                                                            multiple grounds, including that he had
                                                    Register Representative/ODXL, 8701                                                                                Whitney.’’ Id. (citing 21 CFR
                                                                                                            materially falsified his application for a
                                                    Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia                registration, as well as that he had                      1303.05(a)).
                                                    22152. Request for hearings should be                   committed acts which render his                               Next, the Show Cause Order alleged
                                                    sent to: Drug Enforcement                               registration inconsistent with the public                 that on October 28, 2013, Respondent
                                                    Administration, Attention: Hearing                      interest. Id. at 1–2 (citing 21 U.S.C.                    falsified his application for his Ohio
                                                    Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive,                       823(f) and 824(a)(1)).                                    medical license, when he failed to
                                                    Springfield, Virginia 22152.                               As for the material falsification                      disclose that he had previously
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                          allegation, the Show Cause Order                          surrendered his DEA registration. Id. at
                                                    Attorney General has delegated his                      alleged that on November 9, 2011,                         1–2. The Order further alleged that this
                                                    authority under the Controlled                          Respondent had voluntarily surrendered                    ‘‘conduct evidences a lack of candor to
                                                    Substances Act to the Administrator of                  his previous DEA Registration. Id. The                    Ohio licensing authorities.’’ Id. (citing
                                                    the Drug Enforcement Administration                     Order then alleged that on March 14,                      21 U.S.C. 823(f)(5)).
                                                    (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to                    2013, Respondent applied for a new                            Finally, the Show Cause Order
                                                    exercise all necessary functions with                   DEA registration, but materially falsified                notified Respondent of his right to
                                                    respect to the promulgation and                                                                                   request a hearing on the allegations or
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            the application when he ‘‘answered ‘no’
                                                    implementation of 21 CFR part 1301,                     to question which asked, ‘[h]as the                       to submit a written statement in lieu of
                                                    incident to the registration of                         Respondent ever surrendered (for cause)                   a hearing, the procedure for electing
                                                    manufacturers, distributors, dispensers,                or had a federal controlled substance                     either option, and the consequence of
                                                    importers, and exporters of controlled                  registration revoked, suspended,                          failing to elect either option. Id. at 2–3
                                                    substances (other than final orders in                  restricted or denied, or is any such                      (citing 21 CFR 1301.43). The
                                                    connection with suspension, denial, or                  action pending?’’’ Id.                                    Government also included with the
                                                    revocation of registration) has been                       As for the allegations that Respondent                 Order a sample Request for Hearing
                                                    redelegated to the Deputy Assistant                     had committed acts which render his                       form. Id. at 4.


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:02 Aug 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00051   Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703      E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM   18AUN1



Document Created: 2015-12-15 12:05:08
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 12:05:08
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation80 FR 50034 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR