80 FR 51125 - Security Zone; Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 163 (August 24, 2015)

Page Range		51125-51127
FR Document		2015-20865

The Coast Guard is establishing two 1000-yard temporary security zones in support of U.S. Secret Service (USSS) security operations in the navigable waters of the U.S. in portions of the coastal areas of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. These security zones are needed to support USSS security operations and will be effective as directed by the USSS within 1000 yards of the navigable waters of the U.S. in portions of the coastal areas of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. Vessel and people are prohibited from entering this security zone unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) or the COTP's designated on-scene representative.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 163 (Monday, August 24, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 163 (Monday, August 24, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51125-51127]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20865]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[USCG-2015-0731]
RIN 1625-AA87


Security Zone; Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing two 1000-yard temporary 
security zones in support of U.S. Secret Service (USSS) security 
operations in the navigable waters of the U.S. in portions of the 
coastal areas of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. These security zones 
are needed to support USSS security operations and will be effective as 
directed by the USSS within 1000 yards of the navigable waters of the 
U.S. in portions of the coastal areas of Martha's Vineyard, 
Massachusetts. Vessel and people are prohibited from entering this 
security zone unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port 
(COTP) or the COTP's designated on-scene representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from 6:30 a.m. on 
August 24, 2015 until 5 p.m. on August 24, 2015. For the purposes of 
enforcement, actual notice will be used from 8 a.m. on August 7, 2015, 
until this rule is effective without actual notice.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket USCG-2015-0731 and are available online 
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2015-0731 in the 
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available 
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), 
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room 
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary rule, call or email Mr. Edward G. LeBlanc at Sector 
Southeastern New England; telephone (401) 435-2351, email 
[email protected]. If you have questions on viewing the docket, 
call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-
366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

APA Administrative Procedure Act
CFR Code of Federal Register
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
U.S.C. United States Code
USCG United States Coast Guard
USSS United States Secret Service

A. Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because of the sensitive security issues 
related to USSS security operations. Providing a public notice and 
comment period is contrary to national security concerns and the public 
interest.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Any delay encountered in this 
temporary rule's effective date would be contrary to the public 
interest given the immediate need to support USSS security operations 
in portions of the coastal areas of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, 
from August 7, 2015 through August 24, 2015.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for this rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast Guard to 
establish security zones.
    The USSS will conduct security operations on property that borders 
U.S. navigable waters within the Captain of the Port, Southeastern New 
England zone. The USSS has requested that the Coast Guard provide 1000-
yard waterside security zones from portions of the coastal areas of 
Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. These security zones are necessary to 
provide security by preventing vessels and persons from approaching the 
area(s) of USSS security operations without prior authorization from 
the COTP.

C. Discussion of Rule

    For the reasons discussed above, the Captain of the Port, Sector 
Southeastern New England, is establishing a temporary security zone. 
The temporary security zone will be enforced from 8:00 a.m. on Friday, 
August 7, 2015 through 5:00 p.m. on Monday, August 24, 2015.
    This action is intended to temporarily prohibit vessels or people 
from approaching within 1000 yards of USSS security operations in 
portions of the coastal areas of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts.
    The Captain of the Port, Southeastern New England, anticipates 
negligible negative impact on vessel traffic from these temporary 
security zones, as they will be in effect for only eighteen days, and 
will only be enforced during USSS security operations in portions of 
the coastal areas of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. It has been 
determined that the necessary security enhancements provided by this 
rule greatly outweigh any potential negative impacts.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does 
not

[[Page 51126]]

require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order.
    The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this rule to be so 
minimal that a full regulatory evaluation under the regulatory policies 
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. The effect of this rule will not 
be significant as the duration of the security zones is for only 
eighteen days, and will only be in effect during USSS security 
operations from portions of the coastal areas of Martha's Vineyard, 
Massachusetts.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be 
small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to 
transit in the vicinity of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts from 8:00 
a.m. on Friday, August 7, 2015 until 5:00 p.m. on Monday, August 24, 
2015. These temporary security zones will not have a significant impact 
on a substantial number of small entities for all of the reasons 
discussed in the ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' section above.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If you 
think your small business or organization would be affected by this 
rule and you have any questions concerning its provisions or options 
for compliance, please call Mr. Edward G. LeBlanc at (401) 435-2351.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually 
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. 
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph 
(34)(g) of the Instruction. This rule fits the category selected from 
paragraph (34)(g), as it establishes temporary security zones for a 
limited period of time. An environmental analysis checklist and a 
categorical exclusion determination will be available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information 
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact 
from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reports and record 
keeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0731 to read as follows:

[[Page 51127]]

Sec.  165.T01-0731  Security Zone; Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts.

    (a) Location. The following areas are security zones: All navigable 
waters, from surface to bottom, within 1000 yards of U.S. Secret 
Service security operations in the navigable waters of the U.S. in the 
coastal areas of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts.
    (b) Notification. Coast Guard Sector Southeastern New England will 
give actual notice to mariners for the purpose of enforcement of these 
temporary security zones.
    (c) Effective and Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced 
from 8:00 a.m. on Friday, August 7, 2015 until 5:00 p.m. on Monday, 
August 24, 2015.
    (d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 
165.33 apply.
    (2) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec.  165.33 of 
this part, entry into or movement within these zones is prohibited 
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated 
representatives.
    (3) The ``designated representative'' is any Coast Guard 
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been designated by the 
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-scene representative 
may be on a Coast Guard vessel, or onboard a federal, state, or local 
agency vessel that is authorized to act in support of the Coast Guard.
    (4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel or his 
designated representative, by siren, radio, flashing light or other 
means, the operator of the vessel shall proceed as directed.
    (5) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within these 
security zones shall contact the Captain of the Port or his designated 
representative via VHF channel 16 to obtain permission to do so.

    Dated: August 4, 2015.
J.T. Kondratowicz,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Southeastern New 
England.
[FR Doc. 2015-20865 Filed 8-21-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

51126 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 163 / Monday, August 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

require an assessment of potential costs 5. Federalism because it does not have a substantial
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that A rule has implications for federalism direct effect on one or more Indian
Order. The Office of Management and under Executive Order 13132, tribes, on the relationship between the
Budget has not reviewed it under that Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Federal Government and Indian tribes,
Order. effect on State or local governments and or on the distribution of power and
The Coast Guard expects the would either preempt State law or responsibilities between the Federal
economic impact of this rule to be so impose a substantial direct cost of Government and Indian tribes.
minimal that a full regulatory evaluation compliance on them. We have analyzed
under the regulatory policies and 12. Energy Effects
this rule under that Order and have
procedures of DHS is unnecessary. The We have analyzed this rule under
determined that it does not have
effect of this rule will not be significant Executive Order 13211, Actions
implications for federalism.
as the duration of the security zones is Concerning Regulations That
for only eighteen days, and will only be 6. Protest Activities Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
in effect during USSS security The Coast Guard respects the First Distribution, or Use.
operations from portions of the coastal Amendment rights of protesters. 13. Technical Standards
areas of Martha’s Vineyard, Protesters are asked to contact the
Massachusetts. person listed in the FOR FURTHER This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
2. Impact on Small Entities INFORMATION CONTACT section to
consider the use of voluntary consensus
coordinate protest activities so that your
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act standards.
message can be received without
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered jeopardizing the safety or security of 14. Environment
whether this rule would have a people, places, or vessels.
significant economic impact on a We have analyzed this rule under
substantial number of small entities. 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Department of Homeland Security
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Management Directive 023–01 and
small businesses, not-for-profit of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
organizations that are independently Federal agencies to assess the effects of which guide the Coast Guard in
owned and operated and are not their discretionary regulatory actions. In complying with the National
dominant in their fields, and particular, the Act addresses actions Environmental Policy Act of 1969
governmental jurisdictions with that may result in the expenditure by a (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
populations of less than 50,000. State, local, or tribal government, in the have concluded this action is one of a
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 aggregate, or by the private sector of category of actions which do not
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or individually or cumulatively have a
a significant economic impact on a more in any one year. Though this rule significant effect on the human
substantial number of small entities. will not result in such an expenditure, environment. This rule is categorically
This rule may affect the following we do discuss the effects of this rule excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
entities, some of which may be small elsewhere in this preamble. (34)(g) of the Instruction. This rule fits
entities: The owners and operators of the category selected from paragraph
vessels intending to transit in the 8. Taking of Private Property (34)(g), as it establishes temporary
vicinity of Martha’s Vineyard, This rule will not cause a taking of security zones for a limited period of
Massachusetts from 8:00 a.m. on Friday, private property or otherwise have time. An environmental analysis
August 7, 2015 until 5:00 p.m. on taking implications under Executive checklist and a categorical exclusion
Monday, August 24, 2015. These Order 12630, Governmental Actions and determination will be available in the
temporary security zones will not have Interference with Constitutionally docket where indicated under
a significant impact on a substantial Protected Property Rights. ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
number of small entities for all of the information that may lead to the
reasons discussed in the ‘‘Regulatory 9. Civil Justice Reform discovery of a significant environmental
Planning and Review’’ section above. This rule meets applicable standards impact from this rule.
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
3. Assistance for Small Entities List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
Under section 213(a) of the Small minimize litigation, eliminate Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
Business Regulatory Enforcement ambiguity, and reduce burden. (water), Reports and record keeping
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), requirements, Security measures, and
we offer to assist small entities in 10. Protection of Children From Waterways.
understanding the rule so that they Environmental Health Risks For the reasons discussed in the
could better evaluate its effects on them We have analyzed this rule under preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
and participate in the rulemaking Executive Order 13045, Protection of CFR part 165 as follows:
process. If you think your small Children from Environmental Health
business or organization would be Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
affected by this rule and you have any an economically significant rule and AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
questions concerning its provisions or does not create an environmental risk to
options for compliance, please call Mr. health or risk to safety that may ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Edward G. LeBlanc at (401) 435–2351. disproportionately affect children.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
4. Collection of Information 11. Indian Tribal Governments 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and
This rule calls for no new collection This rule does not have tribal Department of Homeland Security Delegation
of information under the Paperwork implications under Executive Order No. 0170.1.
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 13175, Consultation and Coordination ■ 2. Add § 165.T01–0731 to read as
3520). with Indian Tribal Governments, follows:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:27 Aug 21, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM 24AUR1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 163 / Monday, August 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 51127

§ 165.T01–0731 Security Zone; Martha’s ACTION: Direct final rule. of operation, and special arrangements
Vineyard, Massachusetts. should be made for deliveries of boxed
(a) Location. The following areas are SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection information. The Regional Office official
security zones: All navigable waters, Agency (EPA) is making determinations hours of business are Monday through
from surface to bottom, within 1000 under the Clean Air Act (CAA) that the Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
yards of U.S. Secret Service security Chicago, Illinois and Eagan, Minnesota Federal holidays.
operations in the navigable waters of the nonattainment areas (hereafter also
Instructions: Direct your comments to
U.S. in the coastal areas of Martha’s referred to, respectively, as the ‘‘Chicago
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2015–
Vineyard, Massachusetts. area,’’ ‘‘Eagan area,’’ or ‘‘areas’’) have
0408 (Chicago area) or EPA–R05–OAR–
(b) Notification. Coast Guard Sector attained the 2008 lead (Pb) national
2015–0409 (Eagan area). EPA’s policy is
Southeastern New England will give ambient air quality standard (NAAQS or
standard). These determinations of that all comments received will be
actual notice to mariners for the purpose included in the public docket without
of enforcement of these temporary attainment are based upon complete,
quality-assured, and certified ambient change and may be made available
security zones. online at www.regulations.gov,
(c) Effective and Enforcement Period. air monitoring data for the 2012–2014
design period showing that the areas including any personal information
This section will be enforced from 8:00
have achieved attainment of the 2008 Pb provided, unless the comment includes
a.m. on Friday, August 7, 2015 until
NAAQS. Additionally, as a result of information claimed to be Confidential
5:00 p.m. on Monday, August 24, 2015.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general these determinations, EPA is Business Information (CBI) or other
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.33 suspending the requirements for the information whose disclosure is
apply. areas to submit attainment restricted by statute. Do not submit
(2) In accordance with the general demonstrations, and associated information that you consider to be CBI
regulations in § 165.33 of this part, entry reasonably available control measures or otherwise protected through
into or movement within these zones is (RACM), reasonable further progress www.regulations.gov or email. The
prohibited unless authorized by the (RFP) plans, contingency measures for www.regulations.gov Web site is an
Captain of the Port or his designated failure to meet RFP, and attainment ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
representatives. deadlines, for as long as the areas means EPA will not know your identity
(3) The ‘‘designated representative’’ is continue to attain the 2008 Pb NAAQS. or contact information unless you
any Coast Guard commissioned, This action does not constitute a provide it in the body of your comment.
warrant, or petty officer who has been redesignation of the areas to attainment If you send an email comment directly
designated by the Captain of the Port to of the 2008 Pb NAAQS; the areas remain to EPA without going through
act on his behalf. The on-scene designated nonattainment until such www.regulations.gov your email address
representative may be on a Coast Guard time as EPA determines that the areas will be automatically captured and
vessel, or onboard a federal, state, or meet the CAA requirements for included as part of the comment that is
local agency vessel that is authorized to redesignation to attainment and takes placed in the public docket and made
act in support of the Coast Guard. action to redesignate the areas. available on the Internet. If you submit
(4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast DATES: This direct final rule will be
an electronic comment, EPA
Guard vessel or his designated effective October 23, 2015, unless EPA recommends that you include your
representative, by siren, radio, flashing receives adverse comments by name and other contact information in
light or other means, the operator of the September 23, 2015. If adverse the body of your comment and with any
vessel shall proceed as directed. comments are received, EPA will disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
(5) Vessel operators desiring to enter publish a timely withdrawal of the cannot read your comment due to
or operate within these security zones direct final rule in the Federal Register technical difficulties and cannot contact
shall contact the Captain of the Port or informing the public that the rule will you for clarification, EPA may not be
his designated representative via VHF not take effect. able to consider your comment.
channel 16 to obtain permission to do Electronic files should avoid the use of
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
so. special characters, any form of
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
Dated: August 4, 2015. encryption, and be free of any defects or
OAR–2015–0408 (Chicago area) or EPA–
viruses.
J.T. Kondratowicz, R05–OAR–2015–0409 (Eagan area), by
one of the following methods: Docket: All documents in the docket
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Southeastern New England. 1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the are listed in the www.regulations.gov
on-line instructions for submitting index. Although listed in the index,
[FR Doc. 2015–20865 Filed 8–21–15; 8:45 am]
comments. some information is not publicly
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
2. Email: aburano.douglas@epa.gov. available, e.g., CBI or other information
3. Fax: (312) 408–2279. whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief, Certain other material, such as
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION copyrighted material, will be publicly
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
AGENCY available only in hard copy. Publicly
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
40 CFR Part 52 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available docket materials are available
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, either electronically in
[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0408; EPA–R05– Illinois 60604. www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
OAR–2015–0409; FRL–9932–63–Region 5] 5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano, the Environmental Protection Agency,
Chief, Attainment Planning and Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Air Plan Approval; IL; MN;
Maintenance Section, Air Programs West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Determinations of Attainment of the
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
2008 Lead Standard for Chicago and
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Eagan
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Such deliveries are only accepted recommend that you telephone Eric
Agency (EPA). during the Regional Office normal hours Svingen, Environmental Engineer, at

VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:27 Aug 21, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM 24AUR1

Document Created: 2015-12-15 10:55:24
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 10:55:24

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from 6:30 a.m. on August 24, 2015 until 5 p.m. on August 24, 2015. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 8 a.m. on August 7, 2015, until this rule is effective without actual notice.
Contact		If you have questions on this temporary rule, call or email Mr. Edward G. LeBlanc at Sector Southeastern New England; telephone (401) 435-2351, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202- 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 51125
RIN Number		1625-AA87
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reports and Record Keeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 51125 - Security Zone; Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 163 (August 24, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard