80 FR 51170 - Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities; New York
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 163 (August 24, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 163 (August 24, 2015)
| Page Range | 51170-51172 | |
| FR Document | 2015-20904 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 163 (Monday, August 24, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 51170-51172] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-20904] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [EPA-R02-OAR-2015-0509, FRL-9933-01-Region 2] Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities; New York AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to withdraw its approval of a provision of the New York State plan that implements and enforces the Emission Guidelines for existing sewage sludge incineration units. This action would withdraw the EPA's approval of a provision of the State sewage sludge incineration plan allowing for affirmative defenses of Clean Air Act violations in the case of malfunctions. No other provision in the State plan would be affected by this action. DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 23, 2015. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA- R02-OAR-2015-0509 by one of the following methods:www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. Email: Ruvo.Richard@epa.gov Mail: EPA-R02-OAR-2015-0509, Richard Ruvo, Chief, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. Hand Delivery: Richard Ruvo, Chief, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. excluding federal holidays. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R02-OAR- 2015-0509. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change, and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about the EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available at www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. The EPA requests, if at all possible, that you [[Page 51171]] contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the docket. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony (Ted) Gardella (Gardella.anthony@epa.gov), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-3892. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following table of contents describes the format for the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section: I. What action is the EPA proposing today? II. Which provision of the State sewage sludge incineration (SSI) plan is EPA withdrawing approval of? III. Why is the EPA taking this action? IV. Who is affected by the State SSI plan and the amendment to the State SSI plan? V. What is the background for New York State's request to amend the State SSI plan? VI. What approval criteria did we use to evaluate New York State's January 2015 request to amend the State SSI plan? VII. What is the EPA's conclusion? VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What action is the EPA proposing today? The EPA is proposing to withdraw its prior approval of an affirmative defense provision in New York State's SSI plan, based on a request submitted on January 27, 2015, by New York State. New York State submitted the State SSI plan for EPA approval on July 1, 2013 to fulfill the requirements of section 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The EPA approved the proposed State SSI plan on June 11, 2014 (79 FR 33456). The State SSI plan adopts and implements the emission guidelines (EG) set forth at Title 40 part 60 subpart MMMM of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and is applicable to existing SSI units and establishes air emission limits and other requirements. Existing SSI units are units constructed on or before October 14, 2010. II. Which provision of the State SSI plan is EPA withdrawing approval of? New York State is requesting that the EPA withdraw its approval of a provision in the State SSI plan that allows for an affirmative defense by an owner/operator of an SSI unit for violations of air emissions or other requirements of the State's plan in the event of malfunction(s) of an SSI unit. The EPA's proposed withdrawal of its prior approval, once finalized and effective, will result in the removal of the affirmative defense provisions from the federally- enforceable State SSI plan while maintaining the federal enforceability of the remainder of the State SSI plan for covered SSI units located in New York State. III. Why is the EPA taking this action? The EPA has determined that New York State's request that EPA withdraw approval of the affirmative defense provision in the State SSI plan meets all applicable requirements and therefore the EPA is proposing to withdraw its approval of that provision. IV. Who is affected by the State SSI plan and the amendment to the State SSI plan? The State SSI plan regulates all the units designated by the EG for existing SSI units and which are located at a wastewater treatment facility designed to treat domestic sewage sludge. If the owner or operator of a covered SSI unit made changes after September 21, 2011, that meet the definition of modification (see 40 CFR 60.5250), the SSI unit would become subject to 40 CFR part 60 subpart LLLL (New Source Performance Standards for New Sewage Sludge Incineration Units), and the State SSI plan would no longer apply to that unit. V. What is the background for New York State's request to amend the State SSI plan? In an April 18, 2014 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court) vacated an affirmative defense in one of the EPA's Section 112 regulations. NRDC v. EPA, 749 F.3d 1055 (D.C. Cir., 2014) (vacating affirmative defense provisions in Section 112 rule establishing emission standards for Portland cement kilns). The court found that the EPA lacked authority to establish an affirmative defense for private civil suits and held that under the CAA, the authority to determine civil penalty amounts in such cases lies exclusively with the courts, not the EPA. The vacated affirmative defense provision in the EPA's Portland cement MACT rule is identical to the affirmative defense provision in the EPA's SSI EG, promulgated on March 21, 2011, under sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA, at Sec. 60.5181 (``How do I establish an affirmative defense for exceedance of an emission limit or standard during a malfunction?''). New York's State SSI plan adopted by reference all the applicable requirements of the EPA's SSI EG, including the affirmative defense provisions at Sec. 60.5181, into its State plan at Part 200 of Title 6 of the New York Code of Rules and Regulations (6NYCRR) of the State of New York, entitled ``General Provisions.'' Because of the April 2014 D.C. Court vacatur referred to above, New York State submitted its January 27, 2015 letter requesting that EPA withdraw its approval of the affirmative defense provision as part of the State SSI plan submitted to the EPA for approval on July 1, 2013.\1\ Consequently, the EPA is proposing to withdraw its prior approval of that particular provision of the State SSI plan as discussed herein. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ EPA has proposed a Federal SSI plan which would apply to SSI units that are not covered by an approved and effective state plan. The proposed federal plan does not include an affirmative defense to violations that result from malfunctions. 80 FR 23402, 23407 (Apr. 27, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VI. What approval criteria did we use to evaluate New York State's January 2015 request to amend the State SSI plan? The EPA reviewed New York State's request against the applicable requirements of section 129(b)(2) of the CAA. To ensure consistency, the EPA reviewed New York State's request against the proposed Federal SSI plan, discussed in footnote 1 of this notice, which does not include an affirmative defense to violations that result from malfunctions. VII. What is the EPA's conclusion? The EPA has determined that New York State's SSI plan will continue to meet all the applicable approval criteria if EPA withdraws its approval of the affirmative defense provision. First, the removal of the affirmative defense provision is consistent with the D.C. Circuit's decision in NRDC v. EPA, as described above. Second, a state plan must be at least as protective as the emissions guidelines promulgated by the EPA, and the removal of the affirmative defense provision from the approved state plan does not render the plan less protective, as it removes a potential defense to a violation resulting from a malfunction. Therefore, the EPA is proposing to withdraw its approval of that provision of the plan, which the EPA approved on June 11, 2014 (79 FR 33456) as part of New York's sections 111(d) and 129 State SSI plan for existing sewage sludge incineration units. VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a 111(d)/ 129 plan submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 40 CFR 62.04. Thus, in reviewing 111(d)/129 plan [[Page 51172]] submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The 111(d)/129 plan is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian Nation Land, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Aluminum, Fertilizers, Fluoride, Intergovernmental relations, Paper and paper products industry, Phosphate, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Sulfur acid plants, Waste treatment and disposal. Dated: August 13, 2015. Judith A. Enck, Regional Administrator, Region 2. [FR Doc. 2015-20904 Filed 8-21-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![51170 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 163 / Monday, August 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules
VI. Statutory and Executive Order 2000), nor will it impose substantial Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Reviews direct costs on tribal governments or Floor, New York, New York 10007–
Under the CAA, the Administrator is preempt tribal law. 1866. Such deliveries are only accepted
required to approve a SIP submission during the Regional Office’s normal
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
that complies with the provisions of the hours of operation. The Regional
Environmental protection, Air Office’s official hours of business are
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
pollution control, Incorporation by Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
reference, Intergovernmental relations, 4:00 p.m. excluding federal holidays.
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate Instructions: Direct your comments to
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping Docket ID No. EPA–R02–OAR–2015–
provided that they meet the criteria of 0509. The EPA’s policy is that all
requirements, Volatile organic
the CAA. Accordingly, this action comments received will be included in
compounds.
merely proposes to approve state law as the public docket without change, and
meeting Federal requirements and does Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
may be made available online at
not impose additional requirements Dated: August 12, 2015. www.regulations.gov, including any
beyond those imposed by state law. For Heather McTeer Toney, personal information provided, unless
that reason, this action: Regional Administrator, Region 4. the comment includes information
• Is not a significant regulatory action [FR Doc. 2015–20747 Filed 8–21–15; 8:45 am] claimed to be Confidential Business
subject to review by the Office of Information (CBI) or other information
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Management and Budget under whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Do not submit information that you
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION consider to be CBI or otherwise
January 21, 2011); AGENCY protected through www.regulations.gov
• does not impose an information or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
collection burden under the provisions 40 CFR Part 62 site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 which means the EPA will not know
[EPA–R02–OAR–2015–0509, FRL–9933–01–
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); your identity or contact information
Region 2]
• is certified as not having a unless you provide it in the body of
significant economic impact on a Approval and Promulgation of State your comment. If you send an email
substantial number of small entities Plans for Designated Facilities; New comment directly to the EPA without
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 York going through www.regulations.gov your
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); email address will be automatically
• does not contain any unfunded AGENCY: Environmental Protection
captured and included as part of the
mandate or significantly or uniquely Agency (EPA). comment that is placed in the public
affect small governments, as described ACTION: Proposed rule. docket and made available on the
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Internet. If you submit an electronic
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to withdraw comment, the EPA recommends that
• does not have Federalism you include your name and other
implications as specified in Executive its approval of a provision of the New
York State plan that implements and contact information in the body of your
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
1999); enforces the Emission Guidelines for
existing sewage sludge incineration you submit. If the EPA cannot read your
• is not an economically significant comment due to technical difficulties
regulatory action based on health or units. This action would withdraw the
and cannot contact you for clarification,
safety risks subject to Executive Order EPA’s approval of a provision of the
the EPA may not be able to consider
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); State sewage sludge incineration plan
your comment. Electronic files should
• is not a significant regulatory action allowing for affirmative defenses of
avoid the use of special characters, any
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR Clean Air Act violations in the case of
form of encryption, and be free of any
28355, May 22, 2001); malfunctions. No other provision in the
defects or viruses. For additional
• is not subject to requirements of State plan would be affected by this
information about the EPA’s public
Section 12(d) of the National action.
docket visit the EPA Docket Center
Technology Transfer and Advancement DATES: Comments must be received on homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because or before September 23, 2015. epahome/dockets.htm.
application of those requirements would ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Docket: All documents in the
be inconsistent with the CAA; and identified by Docket ID Number EPA– electronic docket are listed in the
• does not provide EPA with the R02–OAR–2015–0509 by one of the www.regulations.gov index. Although
discretionary authority to address, as following methods: listed in the index, some information is
appropriate, disproportionate human • www.regulations.gov. Follow the not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
health or environmental effects, using on-line instructions for submitting information whose disclosure is
practicable and legally permissible comments. restricted by statute. Certain other
methods, under Executive Order 12898 • Email: Ruvo.Richard@epa.gov material, such as copyrighted material,
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). • Mail: EPA–R02–OAR–2015–0509, will be publicly available only in hard
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The SIP is not approved to apply on Richard Ruvo, Chief, Air Programs copy form. Publicly available docket
any Indian reservation land or in any Branch, Environmental Protection materials are available at
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, www.regulations.gov or at the
has demonstrated that a tribe has 25th Floor, New York, New York Environmental Protection Agency,
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 10007–1866. Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch,
country, the rule does not have tribal • Hand Delivery: Richard Ruvo, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
implications as specified by Executive Chief, Air Programs Branch, New York 10007–1866. The EPA
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, Environmental Protection Agency, requests, if at all possible, that you
VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:29 Aug 21, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM 24AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_51333/page/1.svg)
![51172 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 163 / Monday, August 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve relations, Paper and paper products Conservation and Restoration Division,
state choices, provided that they meet industry, Phosphate, Reporting and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
this action merely approves state law as oxides, Sulfur acid plants, Waste Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
meeting Federal requirements and does treatment and disposal. 8960. Such deliveries are only accepted
not impose additional requirements Dated: August 13, 2015. during the Regional Office’s normal
beyond those imposed by state law. For Judith A. Enck, hours of operation, and special
that reason, this action: arrangements should be made for
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory deliveries of boxed information.
action’’ subject to review by the Office [FR Doc. 2015–20904 Filed 8–21–15; 8:45 am]
of Management and Budget under BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Please see the direct final rule in the
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of
October 4, 1993); today’s Federal Register for detailed
• does not impose an information ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION instructions on how to submit
collection burden under the provisions AGENCY comments.
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
40 CFR Part 271 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a [EPA–R04–RCRA–2015–0294; FRL–9932– Gwendolyn Gleaton, RCRA Programs
significant economic impact on a 92–Region 4] and Materials Management Section,
substantial number of small entities Materials and Waste Management
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 North Carolina: Final Authorization of Branch, Resource Conservation and
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); State Hazardous Waste Management Restoration Division, U.S.
• does not contain any unfunded Program Revisions Environmental Protection Agency,
mandate or significantly or uniquely AGENCY: Environmental Protection Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
affect small governments, as described Agency (EPA). Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 8960; telephone number: (404) 562–
ACTION: Proposed rule.
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 8500; fax number: (404) 562–9964;
• does not have Federalism SUMMARY: North Carolina has applied to email address: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov
implications as specified in Executive the Environmental Protection Agency
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Along
(EPA) for final authorization of changes with this proposed rule, EPA is
1999); to its hazardous waste program under
• is not an economically significant publishing a direct final rule in the
the Resource Conservation and ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of
regulatory action based on health or Recovery Act (RCRA). These changes
safety risks subject to Executive Order today’s Federal Register pursuant to
correspond to certain Federal rules
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); which EPA is authorizing these changes.
promulgated between July 1, 2008 and
• is not a significant regulatory action June 30, 2014 (also known as RCRA
EPA did not issue a proposed rule
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR before today because EPA believes this
Clusters XIX through XXIII). With this
28355, May 22, 2001); action is not controversial and does not
proposed rule, EPA is proposing to grant
• is not subject to requirements of expect comments that oppose it. EPA
final authorization to North Carolina for
Section 12(d) of the National has explained the reasons for this
these changes.
Technology Transfer and Advancement authorization in the direct final rule.
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because DATES: Send your written comments by
Unless EPA receives written comments
application of those requirements would September 23, 2015.
that oppose this authorization during
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, the comment period, the direct final
and identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– rule in today’s Federal Register will
• does not provide EPA with the RCRA–2015–0294, by one of the become effective on the date it
discretionary authority to address, as following methods: establishes, and EPA will not take
appropriate, disproportionate human • Federal eRulemaking Portal: further action on this proposal. If EPA
health or environmental effects, using www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line receives comments that oppose this
practicable and legally permissible instructions for submitting comments.
action, EPA will withdraw the direct
methods, under Executive Order 12898 • Email: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov.
final rule and it will not take effect. EPA
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). • Fax: (404) 562–9964 (prior to
will then respond to public comments
The 111(d)/129 plan is not approved faxing, please notify the EPA contact
listed below). in a later final rule based on this
to apply on any Indian reservation land
• Mail: Send written comments to proposed rule. You may not have
or in any other area where EPA or an
Gwendolyn Gleaton, RCRA Programs another opportunity to comment on
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
and Materials Management Section, these State program changes. If you
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Materials and Waste Management want to comment on this action, you
Indian Nation Land, the rule does not
Branch, Resource Conservation and must do so at this time. For additional
have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal Restoration Division, U.S. information, please see the direct final
governments or preempt tribal law as Environmental Protection Agency, rule published in the ‘‘Rules and
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Regulations’’ section of today’s Federal
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303– Register.
8960. Dated: June 26, 2015.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 • Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
Heather McTeer Toney,
Environmental protection, your comments to Gwendolyn Gleaton,
Administrative practice and procedure, RCRA Programs and Materials Regional Administrator, Region 4.
Air pollution control, Aluminum, Management Section, Materials and [FR Doc. 2015–20908 Filed 8–21–15; 8:45 am]
Fertilizers, Fluoride, Intergovernmental Waste Management Branch, Resource BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:29 Aug 21, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM 24AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_51333/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 10:55:03
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 10:55:03
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before September 23, 2015. | |
| Contact | Anthony (Ted) Gardella ([email protected]), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-3892. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 51170 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Air Pollution Control; Aluminum; Fertilizers; Fluoride; Intergovernmental Relations; Paper and Paper Products Industry; Phosphate; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides; Sulfur Acid Plants and Waste Treatment and Disposal |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR