80 FR 51955 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Kansas; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 166 (August 27, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 166 (August 27, 2015)
| Page Range | 51955-51957 | |
| FR Document | 2015-20892 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 166 (Thursday, August 27, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 51955-51957] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-20892] [[Page 51955]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0512; FRL-9932-81-Region 7] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Kansas; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve an element of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of Kansas addressing the applicable requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110 for the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Ozone (O3 ), which requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP to support implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each new or revised NAAQS promulgated by EPA. These SIPs are commonly referred to as ``infrastructure'' SIPs. The infrastructure requirements are designed to ensure that the structural components of each state's air quality management program are adequate to meet the state's responsibilities under the CAA. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective October 26, 2015, without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by September 28, 2015. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07- OAR-2015-0512, by one of the following methods: 1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. 2. Email: [email protected]. 3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Lachala Kemp, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR- 2015-0512. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or email information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in advance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lachala Kemp, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551-7214 or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we'', ``us'', or ``our'' is used, we refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by addressing the following questions: I. Background II. Summary of SIP Revision III. Final Action IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review I. Background On July 16, 2014, (79 FR 41486), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Kansas. The NPR proposed approval of Kansas' submission that provides the basic elements specified in section 110(a)(2) of the CAA, or portions thereof, necessary to implement, maintain, and enforce the 2008 O3 NAAQS. EPA subsequently published the final rulemaking on October 21, 2014, (79 FR 62861). EPA did not act on the visibility protection portion of section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA at that time. II. Summary of SIP Revision On March 19, 2013, and May 9, 2013, EPA received SIP submissions from the state of Kansas that address the infrastructure elements specified in section 110(a)(2) of the CAA for the 2008 O3 NAAQS. The submissions addressed the following infrastructure elements of section 110(a)(2): (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). Specific requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA and the rationale for EPA's proposed action to approve the SIP submission are explained in the NPR and will not be restated here. Under section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA, states are required to submit SIPs that meet, among other provisions, part C of the CAA, relating to prevention of significant deterioration of air quality and visibility protection. With respect to the visibility component of section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA, Kansas stated in its 2008 O3 NAAQS infrastructure SIP submissions that EPA had finalized approval of the Kansas Regional Haze SIP on December 27, 2011 (76 FR 80754). In that rulemaking, EPA determined that Kansas' Regional Haze Plan met the CAA requirements for preventing future and remedying existing impairment of visibility caused by air pollutants. However, EPA did not act on the visibility protection portion of section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA in its final rule that approved portions of Kansas' 2008 O3 NAAQS infrastructure SIP submissions. EPA recognizes that states are subject to visibility and regional haze program requirements under part C of the CAA. However, when EPA establishes or revises a NAAQS, these visibility and regional haze requirements under part C [[Page 51956]] do not change. EPA believes that there are no new visibility protection requirements under part C as a result of a revised NAAQS. Therefore, there are no newly applicable visibility protection obligations pursuant to element J after the promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS. EPA is therefore approving Kansas' SIP as it satisfies the applicable visibility requirements of Element J with respect to the 2008 O3 NAAQS as there are no new applicable visibility requirements triggered by the 2008 O3 NAAQS. III. Final Action EPA is taking direct final action to approve the visibility protection portion of section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA with regard to the March 19, 2013, and May 9, 2013, infrastructure SIP submissions from the state of Kansas. Based upon review of the state's infrastructure SIP submissions and relevant statutory and regulatory authorities and provisions referenced in the submission or referenced in Kansas' SIP, EPA is approving Kansas' SIP submittals as they satisfy the applicable visibility requirements of section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA with respect to the 2008 O3 NAAQS as there are no new applicable visibility requirements triggered by the 2008 O3 NAAQS. We are publishing this direct final rule without a prior proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are received on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 26, 2015. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: August 12, 2015. Mark Hague, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart R--Kansas 0 2. In Sec. 52.870, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding the entry ``(41) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 O 3 NAAQS'' in numerical order at the end of the table to read as follows: Sec. 52.870 Identification of plan. * * * * * (e) * * * [[Page 51957]] EPA-Approved Kansas Nonregulatory Provisions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicable Name of nonregulatory SIP geographic area or State EPA approval date Explanation provision nonattainment area submittal date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (41) Section 110(a)(2) Statewide......... 3/19/2013 8/27/2015 [Insert This action addresses Infrastructure Requirements Federal Register the visibility for the 2008 O3 NAAQS. citation]. protection portion of section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2015-20892 Filed 8-26-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 51955
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Information (CBI) or other information II. Summary of SIP Revision
AGENCY whose disclosure is restricted by statute. III. Final Action
Do not submit through IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review
40 CFR Part 52 www.regulations.gov or email
I. Background
[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0512; FRL–9932–81– information that you consider to be CBI
Region 7] or otherwise protected. The On July 16, 2014, (79 FR 41486), EPA
www.regulations.gov Web site is an published a notice of proposed
Approval and Promulgation of ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which rulemaking (NPR) for the State of
Implementation Plans; State of means EPA will not know your identity Kansas. The NPR proposed approval of
Kansas; Infrastructure SIP or contact information unless you Kansas’ submission that provides the
Requirements for the 2008 Ozone provide it in the body of your comment.
basic elements specified in section
National Ambient Air Quality Standard If you send an email comment directly
110(a)(2) of the CAA, or portions
to EPA without going through
AGENCY: Environmental Protection www.regulations.gov, your email thereof, necessary to implement,
Agency. address will be automatically captured maintain, and enforce the 2008 O3
ACTION: Direct final rule. and included as part of the comment NAAQS. EPA subsequently published
that is placed in the public docket and the final rulemaking on October 21,
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 2014, (79 FR 62861). EPA did not act on
made available on the Internet. If you
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final the visibility protection portion of
submit an electronic comment, EPA
action to approve an element of a State section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA at that
recommends that you include your
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission time.
name and other contact information in
from the State of Kansas addressing the
the body of your comment and with any
applicable requirements of Clean Air II. Summary of SIP Revision
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
Act (CAA) section 110 for the 2008
cannot read your comment due to On March 19, 2013, and May 9, 2013,
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
technical difficulties and cannot contact EPA received SIP submissions from the
(NAAQS) for Ozone (O3), which
you for clarification, EPA may not be state of Kansas that address the
requires that each state adopt and
able to consider your comment. infrastructure elements specified in
submit a SIP to support implementation,
Electronic files should avoid the use of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA for the
maintenance, and enforcement of each
special characters, any form of
new or revised NAAQS promulgated by 2008 O3 NAAQS. The submissions
encryption, and be free of any defects or
EPA. These SIPs are commonly referred addressed the following infrastructure
viruses.
to as ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The Docket: All documents in the docket elements of section 110(a)(2): (A), (B),
infrastructure requirements are designed are listed in the www.regulations.gov (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and
to ensure that the structural components index. Although listed in the index, (M). Specific requirements of section
of each state’s air quality management some information is not publicly 110(a)(2) of the CAA and the rationale
program are adequate to meet the state’s available, i.e., CBI or other information for EPA’s proposed action to approve
responsibilities under the CAA. whose disclosure is restricted by statute. the SIP submission are explained in the
DATES: This direct final rule will be Certain other material, such as NPR and will not be restated here.
effective October 26, 2015, without copyrighted material, will be publicly Under section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA,
further notice, unless EPA receives available only in hard copy form. states are required to submit SIPs that
adverse comment by September 28, Publicly available docket materials are meet, among other provisions, part C of
2015. If EPA receives adverse comment, available either electronically in
we will publish a timely withdrawal of the CAA, relating to prevention of
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at significant deterioration of air quality
the direct final rule in the Federal the Environmental Protection Agency,
Register informing the public that the and visibility protection. With respect to
Air Planning and Development Branch, the visibility component of section
rule will not take effect. 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa,
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA, Kansas stated in
Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– its 2008 O3 NAAQS infrastructure SIP
official hours of business are Monday
OAR–2015–0512, by one of the submissions that EPA had finalized
through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
following methods: excluding legal holidays. The interested approval of the Kansas Regional Haze
1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the persons wanting to examine these SIP on December 27, 2011 (76 FR
on-line instructions for submitting documents should make an 80754). In that rulemaking, EPA
comments. appointment with the office at least 24 determined that Kansas’ Regional Haze
2. Email: kemp.lachala@epa.gov. hours in advance. Plan met the CAA requirements for
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Lachala preventing future and remedying
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kemp, Environmental Protection existing impairment of visibility caused
Lachala Kemp, Environmental
Agency, Air Planning and Development by air pollutants. However, EPA did not
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, act on the visibility protection portion
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Lenexa, Kansas 66219. of section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA in its
Instructions: Direct your comments to Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
(913) 551–7214 or by email at final rule that approved portions of
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2015–
kemp.lachala@epa.gov. Kansas’ 2008 O3 NAAQS infrastructure
0512. EPA’s policy is that all comments
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SIP submissions.
received will be included in the public
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
docket without change and may be Throughout this document whenever EPA recognizes that states are subject
made available online at ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, or ‘‘our’’ is used, we refer to visibility and regional haze program
www.regulations.gov, including any to EPA. This section provides additional requirements under part C of the CAA.
personal information provided, unless information by addressing the following However, when EPA establishes or
the comment includes information questions: revises a NAAQS, these visibility and
claimed to be Confidential Business I. Background regional haze requirements under part C
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:50 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM 27AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_52121/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 51957
EPA-APPROVED KANSAS NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable geographic
Name of nonregulatory State submittal
area or nonattainment EPA approval date Explanation
SIP provision date
area
* * * * * * *
(41) Section 110(a)(2) Statewide ..................... 3/19/2013 8/27/2015 [Insert Fed- This action addresses the visibility protection
Infrastructure Require- eral Register cita- portion of section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA.
ments for the 2008 O3 tion].
NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2015–20892 Filed 8–26–15; 8:45 am] Office of Procurement, Contract and threshold from $100,000 to $500,000.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Grant Policy Division, Attn: Andrew Specifically, the proposed changes are
O’Rourke, Room 5L32, 300 E. Street as follows:
SW., Washington, DC 20546–0001. • Added a new paragraph (b) to
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: section 1845.301–71.
SPACE ADMINISTRATION Andrew O’Rourke, NASA Office of • Changed capitalization threshold
Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy amount from $100,000 to $500,000 in
48 CFR Parts 1845 and 1852 Division, 202–358–4560, email: sections 1845.7101–1, 1845.7101–2,
andrew.orourke@nasa.gov. 1845.7101–3, 1852.245–70, and
RIN 2700–AE23 1852.245–78.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation I. Background III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Supplement: NASA Capitalization Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
Threshold (NFS Case 2015–N004) In accordance with the Statement of
Federal Financial Accounting Standard 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and (SFFAS) No. 6, Accounting for Property, and benefits of available regulatory
Space Administration. Plant, and Equipment, federal agencies alternatives and, if regulation is
are to record as property and equipment necessary, to select regulatory
ACTION: Interim rule.
all items that meet certain approaches that maximize net benefits
SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and characteristics, such as a useful life of (including potential economic,
Space Administration (NASA) is issuing 2 years or more, and are permitted to environmental, public health and safety
an interim rule amending the NASA establish individual capitalization effects, distributive impacts, and
FAR Supplement to increase the NASA thresholds and useful life policies due equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
capitalization threshold from $100,000 to their diverse size and uses of importance of quantifying both costs
to $500,000. property, plant & equipment. SFFAS and benefits, of reducing costs, of
DATES: Effective August 27, 2015. No. 6 was issued in November 1995 and harmonizing rules, and of promoting
Comment Date: Comments on this was effective for fiscal years beginning flexibility. This rule is not a significant
interim rule should be submitted in after September 30, 1997. The current regulatory action under section 3(f) of
writing to the address shown below on NASA capitalization threshold of Executive Order 12866. This rule is not
or before October 26, 2015 to be $100,000, was established when SFFAS a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
considered in the formation of the final 6 was initially implemented and is in IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
rule. the NFS.
The Government Accountability NASA does not expect this interim
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may rule to have a significant economic
Office (GAO) recommends that
submit comments identified by NFS capitalization thresholds should be impact on a substantial number of small
Case 2015–N004, using any of the periodically reevaluated to help ensure entities within the meaning of the
following methods: their continuing relevance and are tied Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
Æ Regulations.gov: http:// to materiality as well, in that they et seq., because the objective of this
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments generally are established at a level that interim rule is to increase the already
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by would not omit a significant amount of established NASA capitalization
entering ‘‘NFS Case 2015–N004’’ under assets from the balance sheet, which threshold from $100,000 to $500,000.
the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or ID’’ and could materially misstate the financial However, an initial regulatory flexibility
selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the link statements of an entity or its analysis has been performed and is
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds components. summarized as follows:
with ‘‘NFS Case 2015–N004.’’ Follow Recently, the NASA Office of the The increase in the NASA
the instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit Chief Financial Officer conducted a capitalization threshold is expected to
a Comment’’ screen. Please include your review of the current NASA benefit NASA contractors by reducing
name, company name (if any), and capitalization threshold of $100,000 and the administrative burden associated
‘‘NFS Case 2015–N004’’ on your based on this review it was determined with financial reporting of NASA
attached document.
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
to increase the capitalization threshold property in the custody of contractors.
Æ Email: Andrew.ORourke@ from $100,000 to $500,000. The legal basis for this rule is 51 U.S.C.
NASA.gov. Include NFS Case 2015– 20113(a).
N004 in the subject line of the message. II. Discussion The requirements under this rule will
Æ Fax: (202) 358–3082. This interim rule revises NFS parts apply to any contract award (including
Æ Mail: National Aeronautics and 1845 and 1852 by increasing an already contracts for supplies, services,
Space Administration, Headquarters, established NASA capitalization construction, and major systems) that
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:03 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM 27AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_52121/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 10:52:57
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 10:52:57
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule will be effective October 26, 2015, without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by September 28, 2015. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Lachala Kemp, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551-7214 or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 51955 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Ozone and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR