80 FR 53350 - Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 171 (September 3, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 171 (September 3, 2015)
| Page Range | 53350-53352 | |
| FR Document | 2015-21819 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 171 (Thursday, September 3, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 53350-53352] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-21819] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 72-40, 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287; NRC-2015-0191] Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an exemption to Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy or the applicant) related to the operation of Oconee Nuclear Station (Oconee) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) (Docket No. 72-40). The request is for an exemption from the requirement to comply with Technical Specification 1.2.4a of Attachment A of Certificate of Compliance (CoC or Certificate) No. 1004, Amendment No. 9, for the Standardized NUHOMS[supreg] Horizontal Modular Storage System. DATES: The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact are available as of September 3, 2015. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0191 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods:Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0191. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Vera, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555- [[Page 53351]] 0001; telephone: 301-415-5790, email: John.Vera@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The NRC is considering issuance of an exemption to Duke Energy, for operation of Oconee ISFSI, located in Seneca, South Carolina. Pursuant to Sec. 72.7 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Specific Exemptions,'' on August 28, 2014, as supplemented on December 8, 2014, and June 12, 2015 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14255A005, ML14346A008, and ML15169B103, respectively), Duke Energy submitted its request for exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i), and the portion of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(11) that requires compliance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of CoC No. 1004, Amendment No. 9, for the Standardized NUHOMS[supreg] Horizontal Modular Storage System. In evaluating the request, the NRC also considered exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2) and 10 CFR 72.214 that are applicable to the request, and the NRC has weighed these regulations in its review. Duke Energy loaded spent nuclear fuel into several 24PHB dry shielded canisters (DSCs). Subsequent to the loading, the applicant identified a discrepancy on a test report processed from the helium leak rate instrument vendor. The discrepancy was that the temperature coefficient was stated as four (4) percent per degree Celsius (%/ [deg]C), when previously this value was three (3) %/[deg]C. The applicant stated that the instrument vendor confirmed that the three (3) %/[deg]C coefficient was incorrect for this instrument and that canisters loaded at ambient temperatures greater than (>) 23 [deg]C would have had a non-conservative temperature coefficient applied to the helium leak rate measurement. The applicant stated that the incorrect value had been used to calculate the leak rates of forty- seven (47) dry shielded canisters DSCs. According to the applicant, forty-two (42) of the forty-seven (47) DSCs affected were verified to meet the TS. The applicant's re- evaluation involved verifying the ambient temperature when the DSCs were loaded and applying the appropriate temperature coefficient. However, the applicant stated that the actual temperature correction value datasheets could not be found for DSCs 93, 94, 100, 105, and 106 and that these canisters were loaded in the summer months when ambient conditions during helium leak testing would likely have exceeded 23 [deg]C, so the revised temperature correction factor would have been applicable. The applicant stated that confirmation that the TS was met with the revised temperature coefficient for these DSCs, without evidence of the actual ambient temperature or test value, was not possible. II. Environmental Assessment Background Oconee Nuclear Station is located on Lake Keowee in Oconee County, South Carolina, 8 miles north of Seneca, South Carolina. Unit 1 began commercial operation in 1973, followed by Units 2 and 3 in 1974. Since 1997, Oconee has been storing spent fuel in an ISFSI operating under a general license as authorized by 10 CFR part 72, subpart K, ``General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites.'' The licensee also has a site-specific ISFSI license, which is not affected by this exemption request and associated environmental assessment (EA). Identification of Proposed Action The CoC is the NRC-approved design for each dry cask storage system. The proposed action would grant Duke Energy an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i), 10 CFR 72.214, and the portion of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(11) that requires compliance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of CoC No. 1004, Amendment No. 9, for the Standardized NUHOMS[supreg] Horizontal Modular Storage System to the extent necessary for Duke Energy to maintain DSCs numbers 93, 94, 100, 105, and 106 in their current position at the ISFSI associated with the operation of Oconee, Units 1, 2, and 3. These regulations require storage of spent nuclear fuel under a general license in dry storage casks approved under the provisions of 10 CFR part 72 and compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in the CoC for each dry storage spent fuel cask used by an ISFSI general licensee. Specifically, the exemption would relieve Duke Energy from meeting Technical Specification 1.2.4a of Attachment A of CoC No. 1004, which limits the leak rate of the inner seal weld to 1.0 x 10-7 reference cubic centimeters per second (ref cc/ s) at the highest DSC limiting pressure. Need for the Proposed Action The exemption would relieve the applicant from meeting Technical Specification (TS) 1.2.4a of Attachment A of CoC No. 1004, which limits the leak rate of the inner seal weld to 1.0 x 10-7 ref cc/s at the highest DSC limiting pressure, allowing for continued storage of DSCs numbers 93, 94, 100, 105, and 106 at the Oconee Nuclear Station ISFSI. According to the applicant's exemption request, confirmation that the technical specification is met is not possible. Without the exemption, the applicant would be in violation of the technical specification with no possibility of demonstrating compliance. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The potential impact of using the TN Standardized NUHOMS[supreg] dry cask storage system was initially evaluated in the EA for the rulemaking to add the TN Standardized NUHOMS[supreg] Horizontal Modular Storage System for Irradiated Nuclear Fuel to the list of approved spent fuel storage casks in 10 CFR 72.214. The exemption proposed to Amendment No. 9 to CoC No. 1004 would permit Duke Energy to maintain DSCs numbers 93, 94, 100, 105, and 106 in their current position at the ISFSI associated with the operation of Oconee, Units 1, 2, and 3. The applicant addressed environmental impacts in the application, stating that for the five (5) DSCs involved, results of the initial inner seal weld dye penetrant test were found to be acceptable, and welded outer top cover plates were installed. Additionally, radiological protection group surveys of affected HSMs confirmed that there is no leakage occurring from the affected canisters. Based on its review of the licensee's application, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed action does not result in any changes to the types or amounts of any radiological effluents that may be released offsite, and there is no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure as a result of the proposed action. Therefore, the staff further concludes there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action, which only affects the requirements associated with the leak testing of the DSCs and does not affect plant effluents, or any other aspects of the environment. Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Alternative to the Proposed Action Because there is no significant environmental impact associated with the proposed action, alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact were not evaluated. As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered denial of the proposed [[Page 53352]] action, which would force Duke Energy to take actions that would involve unloading the DSCs from the horizontal storage modules, transporting them to the cask handling area, opening, rewelding, and retesting the welds, and transporting the DSCs back to the HSMs. Denial of the exemption would result in an increase in radiological exposure to workers, a small potential for radioactive releases to the environment due to radioactive material handling accidents, and increased costs to the licensee. Therefore, the NRC staff has determined that approving the proposed action has a lesser environmental impact than denying the proposed action. Agencies and Persons Consulted The EA associated with this exemption request was sent to the appropriate official of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) by email dated January 22, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15055A604). The state response was received by email dated February 23, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15055A620). The email states that the SCDHEC has no comments. The NRC staff has determined that a consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act is not required, because the proposed action will not affect listed species or critical habitat. The NRC staff has also determined that the proposed action is not a type of activity that has the potential to impact historic properties, because the proposed action would occur only within the established Oconee site boundary. Therefore, no consultation is required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. III. Finding of No Significant Impact The environmental impacts of the proposed action have been reviewed in accordance with the requirements set forth in 10 CFR part 51, ``Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions.'' Based upon the previously mentioned EA, the Commission finds that the proposed action of granting an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i), 10 CFR 72.214, the portion of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(11) that states the licensee shall comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC, in order to allow Duke Energy to maintain DSCs numbers 93, 94, 100, 105, and 106 in their current position at the ISFSI associated with the operation of Oconee, Units 1, 2, and 3, will not significantly impact the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has determined that an environmental impact statement for the proposed exemption is not warranted and that a finding of no significant impact is appropriate. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14 day of August, 2015. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Michele Sampson, Branch Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2015-21819 Filed 9-2-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![53350 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 171 / Thursday, September 3, 2015 / Notices
vi. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)—The exemption is sought involve only 72.212(b)(11) and 72.214, which state
requirements from which an exemption training, and the exemption is thus that the licensee shall comply with the
is sought involve: applicable for a categorical exclusion terms, conditions, and specifications of
(A) Recordkeeping requirements; under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(E). the CoC, only with regard to the
(B) Reporting requirements; Based on the above considerations, requirements of Certificate of
(C) Inspection or surveillance the NRC staff concludes that the Compliance No. 1031, Amendment No.
requirements; proposed exemption meets the 3, Appendix A, Technical Specifications
(D) Equipment servicing or eligibility criteria for categorical and Design Features for the
maintenance scheduling requirements; conclusion set forth in 10 CFR MAGNASTOR® System, Section 5.7
(E) Education, training, experience, 51.22(c)(25). Therefore, pursuant to 10 ‘‘Training Program.’’ The exemption
qualification, requalification or other CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact only exempts ZionSolutions from the
employment suitability requirements; statement or environmental assessment requirement to develop training
(F) Safeguard plans, and materials is required to be prepared in connection modules under the SAT that include
control and accounting inventory with the proposed issuance of the comprehensive instructions for the
scheduling requirements; exemption. operation and maintenance of the ISFSI
(G) Scheduling requirements;
(H) Surety, insurance or indemnity IV. Conclusions SSCs that are not important to safety.
requirements; or Based on the above considerations, The SAT training requirements are still
(I) Other requirements of an the NRC has determined, pursuant to 10 applicable to all important to safety
administrative, managerial, or CFR 72.7, that this exemption is components, as required by the CoC.
organizational nature. authorized by law, will not endanger V. Availability of Documents
The proposed exemption applies only life or property or the common defense
to developing a training program not and security, and is otherwise in the The documents identified in the
under SAT for operation and public interest. Therefore, the following table are publicly available to
maintenance of ISFSI SSCs that are not Commission hereby grants interested persons in ADAMS. For
defined in 10 CFR 72.3 as important to ZionSolutions an exemption from 10 information on accessing ADAMS see
safety. The requirements from which an CFR parts 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(5)(i), the ADDRESSES section of this document.
ADAMS
Document Accession No.
Commonwealth Edison Company letter certifying the permanent cessation of operations at ZNPS, Units 1 and 2 ..................... ML15232A492
Commonwealth Edison Company letter certifying the permanent removal of fuel from the reactor vessels at ZNPS .................. ML15232A487
NRC order and conforming amendments transferring ownership of ZNPS facility ......................................................................... ML090930037
Letter issuing conforming amendments relating to transfer of licenses for ZNPS .......................................................................... ML102290437
Zion exemption request .................................................................................................................................................................... ML14241A424
The exemption is effective upon issuance of an exemption to Duke individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER
issuance. Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy or INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day the applicant) related to the operation of document.
of August, 2015. Oconee Nuclear Station (Oconee) • NRC’s Agencywide Documents
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Independent Spent Fuel Storage Access and Management System
William C. Allen,
Installation (ISFSI) (Docket No. 72–40). (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
The request is for an exemption from available documents online in the
Acting Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing Branch,
Division of Spent Fuel Management, Office
the requirement to comply with ADAMS Public Documents collection at
of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. Technical Specification 1.2.4a of http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
[FR Doc. 2015–21794 Filed 9–2–15; 8:45 am]
Attachment A of Certificate of adams.html. To begin the search, select
Compliance (CoC or Certificate) No. ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
1004, Amendment No. 9, for the select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Standardized NUHOMS® Horizontal Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY Modular Storage System. please contact the NRC’s Public
COMMISSION DATES: The environmental assessment Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
and finding of no significant impact are 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
[Docket Nos. 72–40, 50–269, 50–270 and 50– available as of September 3, 2015. email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
287; NRC–2015–0191] ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID ADAMS accession number for each
NRC–2015–0191 when contacting the document referenced in this document
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Oconee (if that document is available in
Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document. ADAMS) is provided the first time that
Independent Spent Fuel Storage a document is referenced.
Installation You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory using any of the following methods: purchase copies of public documents at
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Commission.
http://www.regulations.gov and search White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
ACTION: Environmental assessment and
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0191. Address Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
finding of no significant impact;
issuance. questions about NRC dockets to Carol FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; Vera, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
SUMMARY:The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering technical questions, contact the Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:42 Sep 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM 03SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_53521/page/1.svg)
![53352 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 171 / Thursday, September 3, 2015 / Notices
action, which would force Duke Energy Commission has determined that an SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSC is an
to take actions that would involve environmental impact statement for the independent agency responsible for,
unloading the DSCs from the horizontal proposed exemption is not warranted among other things, (1) investigation of
storage modules, transporting them to and that a finding of no significant allegations of prohibited personnel
the cask handling area, opening, impact is appropriate. practices defined by law at 5 U.S.C.
rewelding, and retesting the welds, and Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14 day 2302(b), protection of whistleblowers,
transporting the DSCs back to the HSMs. of August, 2015. and certain other illegal employment
Denial of the exemption would result in For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. practices under titles 5 and 38 of the
an increase in radiological exposure to U.S. Code, affecting current or former
Michele Sampson,
workers, a small potential for Federal employees or applicants for
Branch Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing Branch,
radioactive releases to the environment employment, and covered state and
Division of Spent Fuel Management, Office
due to radioactive material handling of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. local government employees; and (2) the
accidents, and increased costs to the interpretation and enforcement of Hatch
[FR Doc. 2015–21819 Filed 9–2–15; 8:45 am]
licensee. Therefore, the NRC staff has Act provisions on political activity in
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
determined that approving the proposed chapters 15 and 73 of title 5 of the U.S.
action has a lesser environmental Code.
impact than denying the proposed Title of Collection: Office of Special
action. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL Counsel (OSC) Annual Survey; OMB
Agencies and Persons Consulted Survey Renewal for FY 2015—Request Control Number 3255–0003, Expiration
for Comment 10/31/2015.
The EA associated with this OSC is required to conduct an annual
exemption request was sent to the AGENCY:Office of Special Counsel. survey of individuals who seek its
appropriate official of the South
Second notice for public
ACTION: assistance. Section 13 of Public Law
Carolina Department of Health and
comment. 103–424 (1994), codified at 5 U.S.C.
Environmental Control (SCDHEC) by
1212 note, states, in part: ‘‘[T]he survey
email dated January 22, 2015 (ADAMS SUMMARY: In accordance with the shall—(1) Determine if the individual
Accession No. ML15055A604). The state Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 seeking assistance was fully apprised of
response was received by email dated U.S.C. Chapter35), and implementing their rights; (2) determine whether the
February 23, 2015 (ADAMS Accession regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, the U.S. individual was successful either at the
No. ML15055A620). The email states Office of Special Counsel (OSC), plans Office of Special Counsel or the Merit
that the SCDHEC has no comments. The to request approval from the Office of
NRC staff has determined that a Systems Protection Board; and (3)
Management and Budget (OMB) for use determine if the individual, whether
consultation under Section 7 of the of a previously approved information
Endangered Species Act is not required, successful or not, was satisfied with the
collection consisting of an electronic treatment received from the Office of
because the proposed action will not survey form. The current OMB approval
affect listed species or critical habitat. Special Counsel.’’
for the OSC Survey expires 10/31/15. The same section also provides that
The NRC staff has also determined that We are submitting the electronic survey
the proposed action is not a type of survey results are to be published in
for renewal, based on its pending OSC’s annual reports to Congress.
activity that has the potential to impact expiration. There are several changes
historic properties, because the Copies of prior years’ annual reports are
being submitted with this request for available on OSC’s Web site, at
proposed action would occur only renewal of the use of the OSC survey.
within the established Oconee site https://osc.gov/Pages/Resources-
Current and former Federal employees, ReportsAndInfo.aspx or by calling OSC
boundary. Therefore, no consultation is employee representatives, other Federal
required under Section 106 of the at (202) 254–3600. The survey form for
agencies, state and local government the collection of information is available
National Historic Preservation Act. employees, and the general public are by calling OSC at (202) 254–3600. Type
III. Finding of No Significant Impact invited to comment on this for the of Information Collection Request:
The environmental impacts of the second time. Comments are invited on: Approval of previously approved
proposed action have been reviewed in (a) Whether the proposed collection collection of information that expires on
accordance with the requirements set consisting of our survey is necessary for 10/31/2015, with some revisions. The
forth in 10 CFR part 51, ‘‘Environmental the proper performance of OSC Disclosure Unit was added for the first
Protection Regulations for Domestic functions, including whether the time to the electronic survey of
Licensing and Related Regulatory information will have practical utility; individuals with cases resolved in FY
Functions.’’ Based upon the previously (b) the accuracy of OSC’s estimate of the 2014. The second major change is that
mentioned EA, the Commission finds burden of the proposed collection of the survey is hosted by Survey Monkey,
that the proposed action of granting an information; (c) ways to enhance the (https://www.surveymonkey.com) rather
exemption from the requirements of 10 quality, utility, and clarity of the than being an in-house supported IT
CFR 72.212(a)(2), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), information to be collected; and (d) tool. A future enhancement will add an
10 CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i), 10 CFR 72.214, ways to minimize the burden of the additional question to the survey about
the portion of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(11) that collection of information on the user’s experience with our new OSC
states the licensee shall comply with the respondents, including through the use Form 14 Wizard and electronic
terms, conditions, and specifications of of automated collection techniques or complaint form, which is currently in
other forms of information technology.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the CoC, in order to allow Duke Energy development.
to maintain DSCs numbers 93, 94, 100, DATES: Comments should be received by Affected public: Current and former
105, and 106 in their current position at October 5, 2015. Federal employees, applicants for
the ISFSI associated with the operation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Federal employment, state and local
of Oconee, Units 1, 2, and 3, will not Kammann, Chief Financial Officer, at government employees, and their
significantly impact the quality of the the address shown above; by facsimile representatives, and the general public.
human environment. Accordingly, the at (202) 254–3711. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:42 Sep 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM 03SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_53521/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 09:56:43
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 09:56:43
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance. | |
| Dates | The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact are available as of September 3, 2015. | |
| Contact | John Vera, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555- 0001; telephone: 301-415-5790, email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 53350 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR