80 FR 54521 - Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Notice of Preliminary Results of 2013-2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 175 (September 10, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 175 (September 10, 2015)
| Page Range | 54521-54523 | |
| FR Document | 2015-22855 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 175 (Thursday, September 10, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 54521-54523] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-22855] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-533-820] Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Notice of Preliminary Results of 2013-2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to a request from the Petitioner,\1\ the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from India (hot-rolled steel). The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2013, through November 30, 2014. This review covers four companies, Ispat Industries Ltd. (Ispat), JSW Steel Ltd. (JSW), JSW Ispat Steel Ltd. (JSW Ispat), and Tata Steel Ltd. (Tata). We preliminarily determine that Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, and Tata had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The Petitioner is Nucor Corporation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: September 10, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George McMahon or Eric Greynolds, AD/ CVD Operations Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1167 and (202) 482-6071, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this order is certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from India. The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheadings: 7208.10.15.00, 7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00, 7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00, 7208.26.00.30, 7208.26.00.60, 7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60, 7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60, 7208.37.00.30, 7208.37.00.60, 7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30, 7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15, 7208.39.00.30, 7208.39.00.90, 7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60, 7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00, 7208.90.00.00, 7211.14.00.90, 7211.19.15.00, 7211.19.20.00, 7211.19.30.00, 7211.19.45.00, 7211.19.60.00, 7211.19.75.30, 7211.19.75.60, and 7211.19.75.90. Products subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings: 7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00, 7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00, 7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90, 7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30, 7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00, 7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00, 7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and 7226.99.00.00. Subject merchandise may also enter under 7210.70.30.00, 7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30, 7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, and 7212.50.00.00. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the Department's written description of the merchandise subject to this order is dispositive.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, titled ``Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. [[Page 54522]] Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, and Tata submitted timely-filed certifications that they had no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR,\3\ and a query of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data did not show any POR entries of subject merchandise by Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, and Tata.\4\ In addition, CBP did not identify any entries of subject merchandise from Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, and Tata during the POR in response to an inquiry from the Department asking CBP for such information.\5\ Based on the foregoing, the Department preliminarily determines that Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, and Tata had no shipments of the subject merchandise, and, therefore, no reviewable transactions, during the POR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Letter from JSW titled, ``Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: No Shipment Certification of JSW Steel Ltd.'' (February 27, 2015). JSW's letter stated, ``{p{time} lease note that this statement applies as well to the companies listed in the Department's initiation notice as Ispat Industries Ltd. and JSW Ispat Steel Ltd. Those companies no longer exist as separate entities, but have been merged into JSW Steel.'' See Letter from Tata titled, ``Antidumping Duty Review of Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Tata Steel Limited Certification of No Shipments'' (March 10, 2015); see also Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 6041 (February 4, 2015). \4\ See Memorandum to the File titled, ``Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Data Query Results,'' dated February 4, 2015; see also Memorandum to the File titled, ``Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Data Query Results based on Second Data Query,'' dated February 24, 2015. \5\ See CBP Message Number 5204308, dated July 23, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rate Upon issuance of the final results of this administrative review, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on May 6, 2003.\6\ If applicable, this clarification will apply to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced or exported by Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, and Tata, for which these companies did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United States. Furthermore, this clarification applies to all POR entries entered under the case number for Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, and Tata if we continue to make a final determination of no shipments of subject merchandise, because these companies and their representatives certified that they made no POR shipments of subject merchandise for which they had knowledge of U.S. destination. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate these entries at the all others rate established in the less-than fair- value (LTFV) investigation, as amended, which is 38.72 percent,\7\ if there is no rate for the intermediary involved in the transaction. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). \7\ See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India, 66 FR 60194 (December 3, 2001) (Amended Final Determination). \8\ See Assessment Policy Notice for a full discussion of this clarification; see also, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989, 56990 (September 17, 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for respondents noted above, which claimed no shipments, will remain unchanged from the rates assigned to the companies in the most recently completed review of the companies; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 38.72 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation, as amended. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Public Comment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\9\ Parties who submit comments are requested to submit: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\10\ All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system within 30 days of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) The number of participants; and (3) A list of the issues parties intend to discuss. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined.\11\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, the Department will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their case briefs, within 120 days after issuance of these preliminary results. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and increase the subsequent [[Page 54523]] assessment of the antidumping duties by the amount of antidumping duties reimbursed. These preliminary results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: September 2, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-22855 Filed 9-9-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices 54521
the City of Memphis, Tennessee, grantee DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 7211.19.15.00, 7211.19.20.00,
of FTZ 77, requesting to expand 7211.19.30.00, 7211.19.45.00,
Subzone 77E at the facilities of International Trade Administration 7211.19.60.00, 7211.19.75.30,
Cummins, Inc., located in Memphis, [A–533–820] 7211.19.75.60, and 7211.19.75.90.
Tennessee. The application was Products subject to this order may also
submitted pursuant to the provisions of Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat enter under HTSUS subheadings:
the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as Products From India: Notice of 7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00,
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the Preliminary Results of 2013–2014 7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00,
regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR Antidumping Duty Administrative 7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90,
part 400). It was formally docketed on Review 7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30,
August 28, 2015. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00,
Subzone 77E was approved on International Trade Administration, 7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00,
December 20, 2010 (Board Order 1735, Department of Commerce. 7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and
76 FR 87, 01/03/2011) and currently SUMMARY: In response to a request from 7226.99.00.00. Subject merchandise
consists of one site (23.3 acres) located the Petitioner,1 the Department of may also enter under 7210.70.30.00,
at 4155 Quest Way, Memphis. Commerce (the Department) is 7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30,
conducting an administrative review of 7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, and
The applicant is requesting authority
the antidumping duty order on certain 7212.50.00.00. Although the HTSUS
to expand the subzone to include two hot-rolled carbon steel flat products subheadings are provided for
additional sites: Proposed Site 2 (19.91 from India (hot-rolled steel). The period convenience and customs purposes, the
acres)—5800 Challenge Drive, Memphis; of review (POR) is December 1, 2013, Department’s written description of the
and, Proposed Site 3 (20.9 acres)—4650 through November 30, 2014. This merchandise subject to this order is
Quality Drive, Memphis. The existing review covers four companies, Ispat dispositive.2
subzone and expanded portion would Industries Ltd. (Ispat), JSW Steel Ltd.
be subject to the existing activation limit (JSW), JSW Ispat Steel Ltd. (JSW Ispat), Methodology
of FTZ 77. No authorization for and Tata Steel Ltd. (Tata). We
production activity has been requested The Department conducted this
preliminarily determine that Ispat, JSW,
at this time. review in accordance with section
JSW Ispat, and Tata had no entries of
subject merchandise during the POR. 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
In accordance with the FTZ Board’s amended (the Act). For a full
regulations, Kathleen Boyce of the FTZ Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results. description of the methodology
Staff is designated examiner to review underlying our preliminary results, see
the application and make DATES: Effective Date: September 10,
2015. the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
recommendations to the Executive The Preliminary Decision Memorandum
Secretary. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
is a public document and is on file
Public comment is invited from George McMahon or Eric Greynolds, electronically via Enforcement and
interested parties. Submissions shall be AD/CVD Operations Office III,
Compliance’s Antidumping and
addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive Enforcement and Compliance,
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Secretary at the address below. The International Trade Administration,
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
closing period for their receipt is ACCESS is available to registered users
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
October 20, 2015. Rebuttal comments in at http://access.trade.gov and is
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
response to material submitted during 482–1167 and (202) 482–6071, available to all parties in the Central
the foregoing period may be submitted respectively. Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
during the subsequent 15-day period to Department of Commerce building. In
November 4, 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
addition, a complete version of the
A copy of the application will be Scope of the Order Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
available for public inspection at the The merchandise subject to this order be accessed directly on the internet at
Office of the Executive Secretary, is certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room products from India. The merchandise index.html. The signed Preliminary
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, subject to this order is currently Decision Memorandum and the
1401 Constitution Avenue NW., classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff electronic version of the Preliminary
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) Decision Memorandum are identical in
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ at subheadings: 7208.10.15.00, content. A list of the topics discussed in
Board’s Web site, which is accessible 7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00, the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
via www.trade.gov/ftz. 7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00, is attached as an Appendix to this
7208.26.00.30, 7208.26.00.60, notice.
For further information, contact 7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60,
Kathleen Boyce at Kathleen.Boyce@ 7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60, 2 A full description of the scope of the order is
trade.gov or (202) 482–1346. 7208.37.00.30, 7208.37.00.60, contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: August 28, 2015. 7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15, Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Andrew McGilvray,
7208.39.00.30, 7208.39.00.90, Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Executive Secretary. Countervailing Duty Operations, titled ‘‘Certain
7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60,
[FR Doc. 2015–22859 Filed 9–9–15; 8:45 am] Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India:
7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00, Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
7208.90.00.00, 7211.14.00.90, of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2013–2014’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
1 The Petitioner is Nucor Corporation. dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Sep 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM 10SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_54696/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices 54523
assessment of the antidumping duties Department initiated an administrative duties occurred and the subsequent
by the amount of antidumping duties review of the antidumping duty order assessment of doubled antidumping
reimbursed. on certain welded carbon steel standard duties.
These preliminary results of review pipes and tubes from India with respect This notice also serves as a reminder
are issued and published in accordance to Lloyds Metals & Engineers Limited to parties subject to administrative
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of and Lloyds Line Pipe Ltd., Lloyds Steel protective order (APO) of their
the Act. Industries Ltd., Jindal Pipes Limited, responsibility concerning the
Dated: September 2, 2015. Maharashtra Seamless Limited, disposition of proprietary information
Paul Piquado,
Ratnamani Metals Tubes Ltd., and Tata disclosed under APO, in accordance
Iron and Steel Co., Ltd.2 with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and On August 18, 2015, Allied Tube &
Compliance. written notification of the return or
Conduit and JMC Steel Group withdrew destruction of APO materials or
Appendix their request for an administrative conversion to judicial protective order is
review.3 hereby requested. Failure to comply
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Results Decision Memorandum Rescission of Review with the regulations and the terms of an
I. Summary APO is a sanctionable violation.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
II. Background This notice is issued and published in
Department will rescind an
III. Scope of the Order
administrative review if a party that accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
IV. Preliminary Determination of No 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Shipments requested a review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
V. Recommendation
publication of notice of initiation of the Dated: September 3, 2015.
[FR Doc. 2015–22855 Filed 9–9–15; 8:45 am]
requested review. Allied Tube & Gary Taverman,
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Conduit and JMC Steel Group withdrew Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
their request for review within the 90- Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
day time limit. Because no other party Operations.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
requested a review, the Department is [FR Doc. 2015–22852 Filed 9–9–15; 8:45 am]
International Trade Administration rescinding this administrative review of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
the antidumping duty order on certain
[A–533–502] welded carbon steel standard pipes and
tubes from India. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Certain Welded Carbon Steel Standard
Pipes and Tubes From India: Assessment International Trade Administration
Rescission of Antidumping Duty The Department will instruct U.S.
Administrative Review; 2014–2015 Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to [A–834–807]
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, assess antidumping duties on all
International Trade Administration, appropriate entries of certain welded Silicomanganese From Kazakhstan:
Department of Commerce. carbon steel standard pipes and tubes Rescission of Antidumping Duty
from India during the POR at rates equal Administrative Review; 2014–2015
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
to the cash deposit rate of estimated
(the Department) is rescinding its antidumping duties required at the time AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
administrative review of the of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, International Trade Administration,
antidumping duty order on certain for consumption, in accordance with 19 Department of Commerce.
welded carbon steel standard pipes and CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
tubes from India for the period of review intends to issue appropriate assessment (the Department) is rescinding its
(POR) May 1, 2014, through April 30, instructions to CBP 15 days after the administrative review of the
2015. publication of this notice in the Federal antidumping duty order on
DATES: Effective Date: September 10, Register. silicomanganese from Kazakhstan for
2015. the period of review (POR) May 1, 2014,
Notifications through April 30, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This notice serves as a final reminder DATES: Effective Date: September 10,
Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD to importers of their responsibility
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and 2015.
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
Compliance, International Trade certificate regarding the reimbursement FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Administration, U.S. Department of of antidumping duties prior to Hermes Pinilla, AD/CVD Operations
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution liquidation of the relevant entries Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; during this review period. Failure to International Trade Administration,
telephone: 202–482–0665. comply with this requirement could U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: result in the Department’s presumption Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Background that reimbursement of antidumping Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202–
482–3477.
On May 29, 2015, based on a timely Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from India: Request SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
request for review by Allied Tube & for Administrative Review’’ (May 29, 2015).
Conduit and JMC Steel Group, domestic 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Background
interested parties and producers of Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
37588 (July 1, 2015). On June 1, 2015, based on a timely
certain welded carbon steel standard 3 See letter from Allied Tube & Conduit and JMC request for review by Eramet Marietta,
pipes and tubes from India,1 the Steel Group to the Department, ‘‘Circular Welded Inc. (Eramet) and Felman Production,
Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from India:
1 See letter from Allied Tube & Conduit and JMC Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review’’
LLC (Felman), domestic interested
Steel Group to the Department, ‘‘Circular Welded (August 18, 2015). parties and producers of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Sep 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM 10SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_54696/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 10:04:30
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 10:04:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | George McMahon or Eric Greynolds, AD/ CVD Operations Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1167 and (202) 482-6071, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 54521 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR