80 FR 55035 - Defect and Noncompliance Notification
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 177 (September 14, 2015)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 177 (September 14, 2015)
| Page Range | 55035-55037 | |
| FR Document | 2015-22922 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 177 (Monday, September 14, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 55035-55037] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-22922] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 577 [Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0048] RIN 2127-AL60 Defect and Noncompliance Notification AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This final rule amends NHTSA's regulation requiring motor vehicle manufacturers and replacement equipment manufacturers to notify owners and purchasers of a defect or noncompliance in vehicles or equipment that they produced. The amendments in this final rule will clarify that a manufacturer of replacement equipment providing a defect or noncompliance notification pursuant to this regulation can inform the purchaser of the replacement equipment of the manufacturer's intent to remedy the defect or noncompliance by refunding the purchase price of the replacement equipment. NHTSA is amending this regulation so that the regulation conforms to changes in the defect and noncompliance remedy provisions in the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Safety Act) contained in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). DATES: Effective date: This final rule is effective November 13, 2015. Petitions for reconsideration: Petitions for reconsideration of this final rule must be received not later than October 29, 2015. ADDRESSES: Any petitions for reconsideration should refer to the docket number of this document and be submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground Floor, Docket Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Healy, Office of Chief Counsel, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Healy's telephone number is (202) 366-2992. His fax number is (202) 493-3820. [[Page 55036]] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Safety Act requires manufacturers of motor vehicles or items of replacement equipment to notify NHTSA and owners and purchasers of the vehicles or equipment if the manufacturer determines that a motor vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment contains a defect related to motor vehicle safety or does not comply with an applicable motor vehicle safety standard and to remedy the defect or noncompliance without charge. 49 U.S.C. 30118(c), 30120. Manufacturers must provide notification pursuant to the procedures set forth in section 30119 of the Safety Act. Section 30119 sets forth the contents of the notification, which includes a clear description of the defect or noncompliance, the timing of the notification, means of providing notification and when a second notification is required. 49 U.S.C. 30119. Section 30120 of the Safety Act provides a list of permissible remedies from which manufacturers must choose when determining how to remedy at defect. Section 30120 contains different remedy provisions for manufacturers of motor vehicles and manufacturers of replacement equipment. Section 30120 allows manufacturers of motor vehicles to remedy a defect or noncompliance ``by repairing the vehicle; . . . by replacing the vehicle with an identical or reasonably equivalent vehicle; or . . . by refunding the purchase price, less a reasonable allowance for depreciation.'' 49 U.S.C. 30120(a)(1)(A). Prior to MAP- 21, Section 30120 allowed manufacturers of replacement equipment to remedy a defect or noncompliance by ``repairing the equipment or replacing the equipment with identical or reasonable equivalent equipment.'' 49 U.S.C. 30120(a)(1)(B) (2011). MAP-21 amended section 30120 by expanding the list of permissible remedies available to replacement equipment manufacturers to include refunding the purchase price of the equipment.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Public Law 112-141, 126 Stat. 771 (2012), Section 31311. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The conduct of a recall notification campaign, including how and when owners, dealers, and distributors are notified, is addressed by regulation in 49 CFR part 577, Defect and Noncompliance Notification. Section 577.5 specifies the required content and structure of the owner notifications. Section 577.6 specifies the required content and structure of the notification if the owner notification is sent pursuant to an order by the NHTSA Administrator. Section 577.5 and 577.6 both specify that that the owner notification must include a statement notifying the owner of the vehicle or replacement equipment how the manufacturer intends to remedy the defect or noncompliance. This final rule amends Sec. Sec. 577.5 and 577.6 of 49 CFR part 577 so that the requirements for the statement notifying owners or purchasers of replacement equipment how the manufacturer intends to remedy a defect or noncompliance reflect the MAP-21 amendment allowing manufacturers of replacement equipment to remedy a defect or noncompliance by refunding the purchase price. II. Public Comment NHTSA did not issue an NPRM prior to this final rule. While the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires that agencies publish a general NPRM in the Federal Register prior to issuing a final rule, an agency is not required to publish an NPRM if the agency is able to make and makes a good cause finding that notice and public comment is ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' \2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ 5 U.S.C. 553. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NHTSA finds that notice and public comment prior to issuing this final rule is unnecessary. The DC Circuit has held that the notice and public comment requirements of APA are unnecessary when the ``rule is a routine determination, insignificant in nature and impact, and inconsequential to the industry and to the public.'' \3\ The amendments in this final rule do not create any new rights or obligations not already present in 49 U.S.C. 30120. The amendments in this final rule update the notification requirements in 49 CFR 577.5 and 577.6 to reflect that the option to refund the purchase price of the replacement equipment is available to manufacturers as a remedy for a defect or noncompliance. Furthermore, these changes were made by statutory amendment. Therefore, the amendments contained in this final rule do not involve the exercise of discretion on the part of the agency. Because this final rule does not create any rights or obligations not already present in 49 U.S.C. 30120 or involve the exercise of discretion by the agency, the impacts of this rule are insignificant and inconsequential to industry and the public making notice and public comment unnecessary. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ Mack Trucks, Inc. v. E.P.A. 682 F.3d 87, 92 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (quoting Util. Solid Waste Activities Grp. v. E.P.A., 236 F.3d 749, 754 (D.C. Cir. 2001). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Regulatory Notices and Analyses A. Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures NHTSA has considered the impact of this rulemaking action under Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and the DOT's regulatory policies and procedures. This final rule was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under E.O. 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review.'' It is not considered to be significant under E.O. 12866 or the Department's regulatory policies and procedures. This regulation amends 49 CFR part 577 to include refund of the purchase price of replacement equipment as a remedy available to replacement equipment manufacturers remedying a defect or noncompliance. This final rule does not require replacement equipment manufacturers to take any actions that they are not otherwise already required to take. Because there are not any costs or savings associated with this rulemaking, we have not prepared a separate economic analysis for this rulemaking. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., NHTSA has evaluated the effects of this action on small entities. I hereby certify that this rule would not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The final rule affects manufacturers of motor vehicle replacement equipment some of which qualify as small businesses. However, this final rule does not significantly affect these entities because it does not require any additional actions on the part of equipment manufacturers not already required by 49 CFR part 577. C. Executive Order 13132 NHTSA has examined this rule pursuant to Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and concluded that no additional consultation with States, local governments or their representatives is mandated beyond the rulemaking process. The agency has concluded that the rulemaking would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant consultation with State and local officials or the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The final rule would not have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the [[Page 55037]] distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This final rule also will not preempt any state law. D. National Environmental Policy Act NHTSA has analyzed this final rule for the purposes of the National Environmental Policy Act. The agency has determined that implementation of this action will not have any significant impact on the quality of the human environment. E. Paperwork Reduction Act Under the procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a person is not required to respond to a collection of information by a Federal agency unless the collection displays a valid OMB control number. The information collection requirements for 49 CFR part 577, Defect and Noncompliance Notification, are covered by OMB control number 2127-0004. The amendments in this final rule have no impact on the burden associated with this information collection. F. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act Under the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA) (Pub. L. 104-113), ``all Federal agencies and departments shall use technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies, using such technical standards as a means to carry out policy objectives or activities determined by the agencies and departments.'' The amendments in this final rule consist of minor revisions to the required content of letters that manufacturers of replacement equipment for motor vehicles must sent to purchasers and owners to notify them of a defect or noncompliance and do not involve any voluntary consensus standards. G. Civil Justice Reform With respect to the review of the promulgation of a new regulation, section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice Reform'' (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996) requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the preemptive effect; (2) clearly specifies the effect on existing Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for affected conduct, while promoting simplification and burden reduction; (4) clearly specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately defines key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney General. This document is consistent with that requirement. Pursuant to this Order, NHTSA notes as follows. The preemptive effect of this final rule is discussed above. NHTSA notes further that there is no requirement that individuals submit a petition for reconsideration or pursue other administrative proceeding before they may file suit in court. H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs, benefits and other effects of proposed or final rules that include a Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, local or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of more than $100 million annually (adjusted for inflation with base year of 1995). This final rule would not result in expenditures by State, local or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector in excess of $100 million annually. I. Executive Order 13211 Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 18, 2001) applies to any rulemaking that: (1) Is determined to be economically significant as defined under E.O. 12866, and is likely to have a significantly adverse effect on the supply of, distribution of, or use of energy; or (2) that is designated by the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action. This rulemaking is not subject to E.O. 13211. J. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) The Department of Transportation assigns a regulation identifier number (RIN) to each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in April and October of each year. You may use the RIN contained in the heading at the beginning of this document to find this action in the Unified Agenda. List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 577 Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor vehicles, Tires, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA amends 49 CFR part 577 as follows: PART 577--DEFECT AND NONCOMPLIANCE NOTIFICATION 0 1. The authority citation for part 577 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30102, 30103, 30116-30121, 30166; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 49 CFR 501.8. 0 2. Section 577.5 is amended by revising paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (vi) to read as follows: Sec. 577.5 Notification pursuant to a manufacturer's decision. * * * * * (g) * * * (1) * * * (i) A statement that he will cause such defect to be remedied without charge, and whether such remedy will be by repair, replacement, or refund of the purchase price (in the case of remedy of a vehicle, less depreciation). * * * * * (vi) In the case of a remedy of a vehicle by refund of purchase price, the method or basis for the manufacturer's assessment of depreciation. * * * * * 0 3. Section 577.6 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(9)(i)(B) to read as follows: Sec. 577.6 Notification pursuant to Administrator's decision. * * * * * (b) * * * (9) * * * (i) * * * (B) A statement of the method of remedy. If the manufacturer has not yet determined the method of remedy, he will select either repair, replacement with an equivalent vehicle or item of replacement equipment, or refund of the purchase price (in the case of remedy of a vehicle, less depreciation); and * * * * * Issued in Washington, DC, on September 2, 2015 under authority delegated in 49 CFR part 1.95. Mark R. Rosekind, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2015-22922 Filed 9-11-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 55035
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk Dated: August 21, 2015.
authorizes pre-existing requirements and Avoidance of Unanticipated Ron Curry,
under State law and does not impose Takings’’ issued under the Executive Regional Administrator, Region 6.
any additional enforceable duty beyond Order. This rule does not impose an [FR Doc. 2015–23073 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
that required by State law, it does not information collection burden under the BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
contain any unfunded mandate or provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
significantly or uniquely affect small Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
governments, as described in the Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Feb. 16, 1994) establishes federal
(Pub. L. 104–4). For the same reason, executive policy on environmental National Highway Traffic Safety
this action also does not significantly or justice. It’s main provision directs Administration
uniquely affect the communities of federal agencies, to the greatest extent
Tribal governments, as specified by practicable and permitted by law, to 49 CFR Part 577
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, make environmental justice part of their [Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0048]
November 9, 2000). This action will not mission by identifying and addressing,
have substantial direct effects on the as appropriate, disproportionately high RIN 2127–AL60
States, on the relationship between the and adverse human health or
national government and the States, or environmental effects of their programs, Defect and Noncompliance Notification
on the distribution of power and policies, and activities on minority AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
responsibilities among the various populations and low-income Safety Administration (NHTSA),
levels of government, as specified in populations in the United States. Department of Transportation (DOT).
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Because this rule authorizes pre-existing ACTION: Final rule.
August 10, 1999), because it merely State rules which are at least equivalent
authorizes State requirements as part of to, and no less stringent than existing SUMMARY: This final rule amends
the State RCRA hazardous waste federal requirements, and impose no NHTSA’s regulation requiring motor
program without altering the additional requirements beyond those vehicle manufacturers and replacement
relationship or the distribution of power imposed by State law, and there are no equipment manufacturers to notify
and responsibilities established by anticipated significant adverse human owners and purchasers of a defect or
RCRA. This action also is not subject to health or environmental effects, the rule noncompliance in vehicles or
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, is not subject to Executive Order 12898. equipment that they produced. The
April 23, 1997), because it is not amendments in this final rule will
economically significant and it does not The Congressional Review Act, 5 clarify that a manufacturer of
make decisions based on environmental U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small replacement equipment providing a
health or safety risks. This rule is not Business Regulatory Enforcement defect or noncompliance notification
subject to Executive Order 13211, Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides pursuant to this regulation can inform
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That that before a rule may take effect, the the purchaser of the replacement
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, agency promulgating the rule must equipment of the manufacturer’s intent
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May submit a rule report, which includes a to remedy the defect or noncompliance
22, 2001)) because it is not a significant copy of the rule, to each House of the by refunding the purchase price of the
regulatory action under Executive Order Congress and to the Comptroller General replacement equipment. NHTSA is
12866. of the United States. The EPA will amending this regulation so that the
submit a report containing this regulation conforms to changes in the
Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants document and other required
a State’s application for authorization as defect and noncompliance remedy
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. provisions in the National Traffic and
long as the State meets the criteria House of Representatives, and the
required by RCRA. It would thus be Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Safety Act)
Comptroller General of the United contained in the Moving Ahead for
inconsistent with applicable law for the States prior to publication in the
EPA, when it reviews a State Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP–
Federal Register. A major rule cannot 21).
authorization application, to require the take effect until 60 days after it is
use of any particular voluntary DATES: Effective date: This final rule is
published in the Federal Register. This
consensus standard in place of another effective November 13, 2015.
action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined Petitions for reconsideration: Petitions
standard that otherwise satisfies the by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This action
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the for reconsideration of this final rule
nevertheless will be effective November must be received not later than October
requirements of section 12(d) of the 13, 2015.
National Technology Transfer and 29, 2015.
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271 ADDRESSES: Any petitions for
272 note) do not apply. As required by reconsideration should refer to the
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 Environmental protection, docket number of this document and be
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing Administrative practice and procedure, submitted to: Administrator, National
this rule, the EPA has taken the Confidential business information, Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
necessary steps to eliminate drafting Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
errors and ambiguity, minimize transportation, Indian lands, Building, Ground Floor, Docket Room
potential litigation, and provide a clear Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, W12–140, Washington, DC 20590.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
legal standard for affected conduct. The Reporting and recordkeeping FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
EPA has complied with Executive Order requirements. Thomas Healy, Office of Chief Counsel,
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by Authority: This action is issued under the NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
examining the takings implications of authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Healy’s
the rule in accordance with the 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as telephone number is (202) 366–2992.
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b). His fax number is (202) 493–3820.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Sep 11, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM 14SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_55212/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 55037
distribution of power and reduction; (4) clearly specifies the In consideration of the foregoing,
responsibilities among the various retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately NHTSA amends 49 CFR part 577 as
levels of government.’’ This final rule defines key terms; and (6) addresses follows:
also will not preempt any state law. other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any PART 577—DEFECT AND
D. National Environmental Policy Act NONCOMPLIANCE NOTIFICATION
guidelines issued by the Attorney
NHTSA has analyzed this final rule General. This document is consistent
for the purposes of the National with that requirement. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 577
Environmental Policy Act. The agency Pursuant to this Order, NHTSA notes continues to read as follows:
has determined that implementation of as follows. The preemptive effect of this Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30102, 30103, 30116–
this action will not have any significant final rule is discussed above. NHTSA 30121, 30166; delegation of authority at 49
impact on the quality of the human notes further that there is no CFR 1.95 and 49 CFR 501.8.
environment. requirement that individuals submit a
E. Paperwork Reduction Act petition for reconsideration or pursue ■ 2. Section 577.5 is amended by
other administrative proceeding before revising paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (vi) to
Under the procedures established by they may file suit in court. read as follows:
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a
person is not required to respond to a H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act § 577.5 Notification pursuant to a
collection of information by a Federal The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act manufacturer’s decision.
agency unless the collection displays a of 1995 requires agencies to prepare a * * * * *
valid OMB control number. The written assessment of the costs, benefits (g) * * *
information collection requirements for and other effects of proposed or final
49 CFR part 577, Defect and rules that include a Federal mandate (1) * * *
Noncompliance Notification, are likely to result in the expenditure by (i) A statement that he will cause such
covered by OMB control number 2127– State, local or tribal governments, in the defect to be remedied without charge,
0004. The amendments in this final rule aggregate, or by the private sector, of and whether such remedy will be by
have no impact on the burden more than $100 million annually repair, replacement, or refund of the
associated with this information (adjusted for inflation with base year of purchase price (in the case of remedy of
collection. 1995). This final rule would not result a vehicle, less depreciation).
F. National Technology Transfer and in expenditures by State, local or tribal * * * * *
Advancement Act governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector in excess of $100 million (vi) In the case of a remedy of a
Under the National Technology annually. vehicle by refund of purchase price, the
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 method or basis for the manufacturer’s
(NTTAA) (Pub. L. 104–113), ‘‘all Federal I. Executive Order 13211 assessment of depreciation.
agencies and departments shall use Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, * * * * *
technical standards that are developed May 18, 2001) applies to any
or adopted by voluntary consensus rulemaking that: (1) Is determined to be ■ 3. Section 577.6 is amended by
standards bodies, using such technical economically significant as defined revising paragraph (b)(9)(i)(B) to read as
standards as a means to carry out policy under E.O. 12866, and is likely to have follows:
objectives or activities determined by a significantly adverse effect on the § 577.6 Notification pursuant to
the agencies and departments.’’ The supply of, distribution of, or use of Administrator’s decision.
amendments in this final rule consist of energy; or (2) that is designated by the * * * * *
minor revisions to the required content Administrator of the Office of
of letters that manufacturers of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a (b) * * *
replacement equipment for motor significant energy action. This (9) * * *
vehicles must sent to purchasers and rulemaking is not subject to E.O. 13211.
owners to notify them of a defect or (i) * * *
noncompliance and do not involve any J. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) (B) A statement of the method of
voluntary consensus standards. The Department of Transportation remedy. If the manufacturer has not yet
assigns a regulation identifier number determined the method of remedy, he
G. Civil Justice Reform will select either repair, replacement
(RIN) to each regulatory action listed in
With respect to the review of the the Unified Agenda of Federal with an equivalent vehicle or item of
promulgation of a new regulation, Regulations. The Regulatory Information replacement equipment, or refund of the
section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988, Service Center publishes the Unified purchase price (in the case of remedy of
‘‘Civil Justice Reform’’ (61 FR 4729, Agenda in April and October of each a vehicle, less depreciation); and
February 7, 1996) requires that year. You may use the RIN contained in * * * * *
Executive agencies make every the heading at the beginning of this
reasonable effort to ensure that the Issued in Washington, DC, on September 2,
document to find this action in the 2015 under authority delegated in 49 CFR
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the Unified Agenda. part 1.95.
preemptive effect; (2) clearly specifies
the effect on existing Federal law or List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 577 Mark R. Rosekind,
regulation; (3) provides a clear legal Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor Administrator.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
standard for affected conduct, while vehicles, Tires, Reporting and [FR Doc. 2015–22922 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
promoting simplification and burden recordkeeping requirements. BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Sep 11, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM 14SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_55212/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-26 10:14:47
Document Modified: 2018-02-26 10:14:47
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | Effective date: This final rule is effective November 13, 2015. | |
| Contact | Thomas Healy, Office of Chief Counsel, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Healy's telephone number is (202) 366-2992. His fax number is (202) 493-3820. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 55035 | |
| RIN Number | 2127-AL60 | |
| CFR Associated | Imports; Motor Vehicle Safety; Motor Vehicles; Tires and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR