80_FR_55238 80 FR 55061 - Petition for Objection to State Operating Permit; NY; Seneca Energy II, LLC

80 FR 55061 - Petition for Objection to State Operating Permit; NY; Seneca Energy II, LLC

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 177 (September 14, 2015)

Page Range55061-55061
FR Document2015-23076

Pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 70.8(d), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed an Order, dated June 29, 2015, granting in part and denying in part a petition filed by Gary A. Abraham on behalf of Finger Lakes Zero Waste Coalition, Inc. (dated December 22, 2012) asking the EPA to object to the Title V operating permit (Permit No. 8-3244-00040/00002) issued by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to Seneca Energy II, LLC (Seneca) relating to the Ontario County Landfill Gas-to-Energy Facility (Facility) in western New York. Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that the petitioner may ask for judicial review by the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit of those portions of the Order that deny objections raised in the petition.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 177 (Monday, September 14, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 177 (Monday, September 14, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 55061]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 70

[Regional Docket No. II-2012-01; FRL-9933-81-Region 2]


Petition for Objection to State Operating Permit; NY; Seneca 
Energy II, LLC

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 
70.8(d), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an Order, dated June 29, 2015, granting in part and denying in part a 
petition filed by Gary A. Abraham on behalf of Finger Lakes Zero Waste 
Coalition, Inc. (dated December 22, 2012) asking the EPA to object to 
the Title V operating permit (Permit No. 8-3244-00040/00002) issued by 
the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to 
Seneca Energy II, LLC (Seneca) relating to the Ontario County Landfill 
Gas-to-Energy Facility (Facility) in western New York. Sections 307(b) 
and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that the petitioner may ask for 
judicial review by the United States Court of Appeals for the 
appropriate circuit of those portions of the Order that deny objections 
raised in the petition.

DATES: Any such petition for review of this Order must be received by 
November 13, 2015 pursuant to section 307(b) of the CAA.

ADDRESSES: You may review copies of the final Order, the petitions, and 
other supporting information during normal business hours at EPA Region 
2, 290 Broadway, New York, New York. If you wish to examine these 
documents, you should make an appointment at least 24 hours before the 
visiting day. Additionally, the final Order is available electronically 
at: http://www.epa.gov/region7/air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/seneca_response2012.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Riva, Chief, Permitting 
Section, Air Programs Branch, Clean Air and Sustainability Division, 
EPA, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007, 
telephone (212) 637- 4074, email address: [email protected], or the 
above EPA Region 2 address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA affords the EPA a 45-day period to 
review, and object to, as appropriate, a title V operating permit 
proposed by a state permitting authority. Section 505(b)(2) of the CAA 
authorizes any person to petition the EPA Administrator, within 60 days 
after the expiration of this review period, to object to a Title V 
operating permit if the EPA has not done so. Petitions must be based 
only on objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable 
specificity during the public comment period provided by the state, 
unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise 
these issues during the comment period or that the grounds for the 
objection or other issues arose after this period. The claims are 
described in detail in Section IV of the Order. In summary, the issues 
raised are that: (1) The Title V permit does not consider the Ontario 
County Landfill (Landfill) and the Facility a single source even though 
they together meet the 3-factor source determination test; and (2) the 
Facility's Title V permit is a ``sham permit.'' The EPA's rationale for 
partially granting and partially denying the claims raised in the 
petition are described in the Order.

    Dated: August 26, 2015.
Catherine McCabe,
Deputy Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-23076 Filed 9-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules                                                 55061

                                                Technology Transfer and Advancement                     Department of Environmental                             Dated: August 26, 2015.
                                                Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because                Conservation (DEC) to Seneca Energy II,               Catherine McCabe,
                                                application of those requirements would                 LLC (Seneca) relating to the Ontario                  Deputy Regional Administrator.
                                                be inconsistent with the CAA; and,                      County Landfill Gas-to-Energy Facility                [FR Doc. 2015–23076 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
                                                  • Does not provide EPA with the                       (Facility) in western New York. Sections              BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                discretionary authority to address, as                  307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide
                                                appropriate, disproportionate human                     that the petitioner may ask for judicial
                                                health or environmental effects, using                  review by the United States Court of                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                                practicable and legally permissible                     Appeals for the appropriate circuit of                AGENCY
                                                methods, under Executive Order 12898                    those portions of the Order that deny
                                                                                                                                                              [FRL–9933–86–OAR]
                                                (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).                        objections raised in the petition.
                                                  The SIP is not approved to apply on                   DATES: Any such petition for review of                40 CFR Part 97
                                                any Indian reservation land or in any                   this Order must be received by
                                                other area where EPA or an Indian tribe                 November 13, 2015 pursuant to section                 Allocations of Cross-State Air
                                                has demonstrated that a tribe has                       307(b) of the CAA.                                    Pollution Rule Allowances From New
                                                jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian                  ADDRESSES: You may review copies of                   Unit Set-Asides for 2015 Control
                                                country, the rule does not have tribal                  the final Order, the petitions, and other             Periods
                                                implications and will not impose                        supporting information during normal                  AGENCY: Environmental Protection
                                                substantial direct costs on tribal                      business hours at EPA Region 2, 290                   Agency (EPA).
                                                governments or preempt tribal law as                    Broadway, New York, New York. If you
                                                specified by Executive Order 13175 (65                                                                        ACTION: Notice of data availability
                                                                                                        wish to examine these documents, you
                                                FR 67249, November 9, 2000).                            should make an appointment at least 24                (NODA).
                                                                                                        hours before the visiting day.                        SUMMARY:    The Environmental Protection
                                                List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
                                                                                                        Additionally, the final Order is available            Agency (EPA) is providing notice of the
                                                  Environmental protection, Air                         electronically at: http://www.epa.gov/                availability of preliminary lists of units
                                                pollution control, Carbon monoxide,                     region7/air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/              eligible for allocations of emission
                                                Incorporation by reference,                             seneca_response2012.pdf.                              allowances under the Cross-State Air
                                                Intergovernmental relations,                            FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      Pollution Rule (CSAPR). Under the
                                                Greenhouse gases, Lead, Nitrogen                        Steven Riva, Chief, Permitting Section,               CSAPR federal implementation plans
                                                dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,                     Air Programs Branch, Clean Air and                    (FIPs), portions of each covered state’s
                                                Reporting and recordkeeping                             Sustainability Division, EPA, Region 2,               annual emissions budgets for each of the
                                                requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile                   290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,                   four CSAPR emissions trading programs
                                                organic compounds.                                      New York 10007, telephone (212) 637–                  are reserved for allocation to electricity
                                                   Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq                     4074, email address: Riva.Steven@                     generating units that commenced
                                                  Dated: September 1, 2015.
                                                                                                        epa.gov, or the above EPA Region 2                    commercial operation on or after
                                                                                                        address.                                              January 1, 2010 (new units) and certain
                                                Debra H. Thomas,
                                                                                                        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA                    other units not otherwise obtaining
                                                Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
                                                                                                        affords the EPA a 45-day period to                    allowance allocations under the FIPs.
                                                [FR Doc. 2015–23075 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                        review, and object to, as appropriate, a              The quantities of allowances allocated
                                                BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                                                                        to eligible units from each new unit set-
                                                                                                        title V operating permit proposed by a
                                                                                                        state permitting authority. Section                   aside (NUSA) under the FIPs are
                                                                                                        505(b)(2) of the CAA authorizes any                   calculated in an annual one- or two-
                                                ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                                                                                        person to petition the EPA                            round allocation process. EPA
                                                AGENCY
                                                                                                        Administrator, within 60 days after the               previously completed the first round of
                                                40 CFR Part 70                                          expiration of this review period, to                  NUSA allowance allocations for the
                                                                                                        object to a Title V operating permit if               2015 control periods for all four CSAPR
                                                [Regional Docket No. II–2012–01; FRL–                   the EPA has not done so. Petitions must               trading programs and is now making
                                                9933–81–Region 2]                                       be based only on objections to the                    available preliminary lists of units
                                                                                                        permit that were raised with reasonable               eligible for allocations in the second
                                                Petition for Objection to State
                                                                                                        specificity during the public comment                 round of the NUSA allocation process
                                                Operating Permit; NY; Seneca Energy
                                                                                                        period provided by the state, unless the              for the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season
                                                II, LLC
                                                                                                        petitioner demonstrates that it was                   Trading Program. EPA has posted a
                                                AGENCY: Environmental Protection                        impracticable to raise these issues                   spreadsheet containing the preliminary
                                                Agency (EPA).                                           during the comment period or that the                 lists on EPA’s Web site. EPA will
                                                ACTION: Notice of final action.                         grounds for the objection or other issues             consider timely objections to the lists of
                                                                                                        arose after this period. The claims are               eligible units contained in the
                                                SUMMARY:   Pursuant to Clean Air Act                    described in detail in Section IV of the              spreadsheet and will promulgate a
                                                (CAA) Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR                      Order. In summary, the issues raised are              document responding to any such
                                                70.8(d), the Environmental Protection                   that: (1) The Title V permit does not                 objections no later than November 15,
                                                Agency (EPA) Administrator signed an                    consider the Ontario County Landfill                  2015, the deadline for recording the
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                Order, dated June 29, 2015, granting in                 (Landfill) and the Facility a single                  second-round allocations of CSAPR
                                                part and denying in part a petition filed               source even though they together meet                 NOX Ozone Season allowances in
                                                by Gary A. Abraham on behalf of Finger                  the 3-factor source determination test;               sources’ Allowance Management
                                                Lakes Zero Waste Coalition, Inc. (dated                 and (2) the Facility’s Title V permit is              System accounts. This notice of
                                                December 22, 2012) asking the EPA to                    a ‘‘sham permit.’’ The EPA’s rationale                availability may concern CSAPR-
                                                object to the Title V operating permit                  for partially granting and partially                  affected units in the following states:
                                                (Permit No. 8–3244–00040/00002)                         denying the claims raised in the petition             Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia,
                                                issued by the New York State                            are described in the Order.                           Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky,


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   20:12 Sep 11, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00024   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM   14SEP1



Document Created: 2018-02-26 10:14:53
Document Modified: 2018-02-26 10:14:53
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionNotice of final action.
DatesAny such petition for review of this Order must be received by November 13, 2015 pursuant to section 307(b) of the CAA.
ContactSteven Riva, Chief, Permitting Section, Air Programs Branch, Clean Air and Sustainability Division, EPA, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007,
FR Citation80 FR 55061 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR