80 FR 55277 - Special Local Regulation, Tennessee River, Mile 255.0 to 256.5; Florence, AL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 178 (September 15, 2015)

Page Range		55277-55279
FR Document		2015-23169
The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a special local regulation for all waters of the Tennessee River, beginning at mile marker 255.0 and ending at mile marker 256.5 on October 3, 2015 from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. This proposed special regulation is necessary to provide safety for the participants in the ``Shoals Dragon Boat Festival,'' an event which will involve non-high speed boat races. Entry into this area will be prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or designated representative.
Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 178 (Tuesday, September 15, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 178 (Tuesday, September 15, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55277-55279]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23169]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0671]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation, Tennessee River, Mile 255.0 to 256.5; 
Florence, AL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a special local 
regulation for all waters of the Tennessee River, beginning at mile 
marker 255.0 and ending at mile marker 256.5 on October 3, 2015 from 
8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. This proposed special regulation is necessary 
to provide safety for the participants in the ``Shoals Dragon Boat 
Festival,'' an event which will involve non-high speed boat races. 
Entry into this area will be prohibited unless specifically authorized 
by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or designated representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before September 22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using 
any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. 
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries 
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion 
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions 
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of 
these three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Petty Officer Vera Max, MSD Nashville, Nashville, TN, at 
615-736-5421 or at vera.m.max@uscg.mil. If you have questions on 
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl F. Collins, 
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at 
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but 
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it 
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully 
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, 
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when 
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you 
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a 
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact 
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number (USCG-2015-0671) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click 
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with 
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them 
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would 
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and 
material received during the comment period and may change the rule 
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
type the docket number (USCG-2015-0671) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click 
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with 
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in 
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation 
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any 
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or 
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice 
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a 
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES. 
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If 
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a 
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The Kilby Laboratory School PTO is holding the ``Shoals Dragon Boat 
Festival'' on October 3, 2015. This event

[[Page 55278]]

is planned to take place at McFarland Park on the waters of the 
Tennessee River mile marker 255.0 through mile marker 256.5, at 
Florence, AL. The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley has determined that 
additional safety measures are necessary to protect participants, 
spectators, and waterway users during this event. Therefore, the Coast 
Guard proposes to establish a special local regulation on specified 
waters of the Tennessee River. This proposed regulation would be in 
effect on October 3, 2015 from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
    The legal basis and authorities for this proposed rulemaking 
establishing a special local regulation are found in 33 U.S.C. 1233, 
which authorizes the Coast Guard to establish and define special local 
regulations for regattas under 33 CFR part 100.

C. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley is proposing to establish a 
special local regulated area for all waters of the Tennessee River 
beginning at mile marker 255.0 and ending at mile marker 256.5. Vessels 
or persons would not be able to enter into, depart from, or move within 
this area without permission from the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley 
or designated representative. Persons or vessels requiring entry into 
or passage through the proposed special local regulated area will be 
required to request permission from the Captain of the Port Ohio 
Valley, or designated representative. They could be contacted on VHF-FM 
Channel 13 or 16, or through Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley at 1-800-
253-7465. This proposed rule would be effective from 8:00 a.m. until 
5:00 p.m. on October 3, 2015. The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley would 
inform the public through broadcast notices to mariners of the 
enforcement period for the special local regulated area as well if any 
changes in the planned schedule.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This proposed special 
local regulation restricts transit on the Tennessee River from mile 
marker 255.0 to mile marker 256.5, for a short duration of nine hours; 
Broadcast Notices to Mariners and Local Notices to Mariners will also 
inform the community of this special local regulation so that they may 
plan accordingly for this short restriction on transit. Vessel traffic 
may request permission from the COTP Ohio Valley or a designated 
representative to enter the restricted area.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The 
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, 
not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated 
and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions 
with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule 
will affect the following entities, some of which may be small 
entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit mile 
marker 255.0 to mile marker 256.5 on the Tennessee River, from 8:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on October 3, 2015. This proposed special local 
regulated area will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities as it will be enforced for a short 
period of time. Additionally, although the proposed special local 
regulated area will apply to the entire width of the river, traffic 
will be allowed to pass through the area with the permission of the 
Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or designated representative. Broadcast 
Notices to Mariners will also inform the community of this special 
local regulation so that they may plan accordingly for temporary 
restrictions on transit.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any 
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such expenditures, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

[[Page 55279]]

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045, 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not 
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under 
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use because it is 
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and 
is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, 
distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a 
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement 
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we 
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a 
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule 
involves the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley establishing a special 
local regulation for all waters of the Tennessee River beginning at 
mile marker 255.0 and ending at mile marker 256.5 to provide safety for 
the participants of the ``Shoals Dragon Boat Festival.'' This rule is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental 
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical 
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated 
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to 
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed 
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the U.S. Coast Guard 
proposes to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. A new special local regulation 100.801T01-0671 is added to read as 
follows:


Sec.  100.801T01-0671  Special Local Regulation; Tennessee River Mile 
255.0 to River Mile 256.5, Florence, AL.

    (a) Location. All waters of the Tennessee River beginning at mile 
marker 255.0 and ending at mile marker 256.5 at Florence, AL.
    (b) Periods of enforcement. This proposed rule will be enforced 
from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on October 3, 2015. The Captain of the Port 
Ohio Valley or a designated representative will inform the public 
through broadcast notice to mariners of the enforcement period for the 
special local regulation.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  100.801 of this part, entry into this area is prohibited unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated 
representative.
    (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the 
area must request permission from the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley 
or a designated representative. U.S. Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley may 
be contacted on VHF Channel 13 or 16, or at 1-800-253-7465.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of 
the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley and designated U.S. Coast Guard 
patrol personnel. On-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel include 
commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.

    Dated: August 13, 2015.
R.V. Timme,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2015-23169 Filed 9-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
55278 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules

is planned to take place at McFarland section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 qualifies and how and to what degree
Park on the waters of the Tennessee or under section 1 of Executive Order this rule would economically affect it.
River mile marker 255.0 through mile 13563. The Office of Management and
marker 256.5, at Florence, AL. The Budget has not reviewed it under those 3. Assistance for Small Entities
Captain of the Port Ohio Valley has Orders. This proposed special local Under section 213(a) of the Small
determined that additional safety regulation restricts transit on the Business Regulatory Enforcement
measures are necessary to protect Tennessee River from mile marker 255.0 Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
participants, spectators, and waterway to mile marker 256.5, for a short we want to assist small entities in
users during this event. Therefore, the duration of nine hours; Broadcast understanding this proposed rule. If the
Coast Guard proposes to establish a Notices to Mariners and Local Notices to rule would affect your small business,
special local regulation on specified Mariners will also inform the organization, or governmental
waters of the Tennessee River. This community of this special local
proposed regulation would be in effect jurisdiction and you have questions
regulation so that they may plan
on October 3, 2015 from 8:00 a.m. until concerning its provisions or options for
accordingly for this short restriction on
5:00 p.m. compliance, please contact the person
transit. Vessel traffic may request
The legal basis and authorities for this listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
permission from the COTP Ohio Valley
proposed rulemaking establishing a CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
or a designated representative to enter
special local regulation are found in 33 the restricted area. not retaliate against small entities that
U.S.C. 1233, which authorizes the Coast question or complain about this
Guard to establish and define special 2. Impact on Small Entities proposed rule or any policy or action of
local regulations for regattas under 33 Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act the Coast Guard.
CFR part 100. (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 4. Collection of Information
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies This proposed rule will not call for a
The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed new collection of information under the
is proposing to establish a special local rule will not have a significant Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
regulated area for all waters of the economic impact on a substantial U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Tennessee River beginning at mile number of small entities. The term
marker 255.0 and ending at mile marker 5. Federalism
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
256.5. Vessels or persons would not be businesses, not-for-profit organizations
able to enter into, depart from, or move A rule has implications for federalism
that are independently owned and under Executive Order 13132,
within this area without permission operated and are not dominant in their
from the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
fields, and governmental jurisdictions effect on the States, on the relationship
or designated representative. Persons or with populations of less than 50,000.
vessels requiring entry into or passage between the national government and
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. the States, or on the distribution of
through the proposed special local 605(b) that this proposed rule will not
regulated area will be required to power and responsibilities among the
have a significant economic impact on various levels of government. We have
request permission from the Captain of a substantial number of small entities.
the Port Ohio Valley, or designated analyzed this proposed rule under that
This rule will affect the following Order and determined that this rule
representative. They could be contacted entities, some of which may be small
on VHF–FM Channel 13 or 16, or does not have implications for
entities: The owners or operators of federalism.
through Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley vessels intending to transit mile marker
at 1–800–253–7465. This proposed rule 255.0 to mile marker 256.5 on the 6. Protest Activities
would be effective from 8:00 a.m. until Tennessee River, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
5:00 p.m. on October 3, 2015. The p.m. on October 3, 2015. This proposed The Coast Guard respects the First
Captain of the Port Ohio Valley would special local regulated area will not Amendment rights of protesters.
inform the public through broadcast have a significant economic impact on Protesters are asked to contact the
notices to mariners of the enforcement a substantial number of small entities as person listed in the FOR FURTHER
period for the special local regulated it will be enforced for a short period of INFORMATION CONTACT section to
area as well if any changes in the time. Additionally, although the coordinate protest activities so that your
planned schedule. proposed special local regulated area message can be received without
E. Regulatory Analyses will apply to the entire width of the jeopardizing the safety or security of
river, traffic will be allowed to pass people, places or vessels.
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and through the area with the permission of 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
executive orders related to rulemaking. the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or
Below we summarize our analyses designated representative. Broadcast The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
based on a number of these statutes or Notices to Mariners will also inform the of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
executive orders. community of this special local Federal agencies to assess the effects of
regulation so that they may plan their discretionary regulatory actions. In
1. Regulatory Planning and Review accordingly for temporary restrictions particular, the Act addresses actions
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

This proposed rule is not a significant on transit. that may result in the expenditure by a
regulatory action under section 3(f) of If you think that your business, State, local, or tribal government, in the
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory organization, or governmental aggregate, or by the private sector of
Planning and Review, as supplemented jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
by Executive Order 13563, Improving and that this rule would have a more in any one year. Though this
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and significant economic impact on it, proposed rule would not result in such
does not require an assessment of please submit a comment (see expenditures, we do discuss the effects
potential costs and benefits under ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:46 Sep 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15SEP1.SGM 15SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 178 / Tuesday, September 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules 55279

8. Taking of Private Property Security Management Directive 023–01 this part, entry into this area is
This proposed rule would not cause a and Commandant Instruction prohibited unless authorized by the
taking of private property or otherwise M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a
have taking implications under Guard in complying with the National designated representative.
Executive Order 12630, Governmental Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
Actions and Interference with (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and into or passage through the area must
Constitutionally Protected Property have made a preliminary determination request permission from the Captain of
Rights. that this action is one of a category of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated
actions that do not individually or representative. U.S. Coast Guard Sector
9. Civil Justice Reform cumulatively have a significant effect on Ohio Valley may be contacted on VHF
This proposed rule meets applicable the human environment. This proposed Channel 13 or 16, or at 1–800–253–
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of rule involves the Captain of the Port 7465.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Ohio Valley establishing a special local (3) All persons and vessels shall
Reform, to minimize litigation, regulation for all waters of the comply with the instructions of the
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce Tennessee River beginning at mile Captain of the Port Ohio Valley and
burden. marker 255.0 and ending at mile marker designated U.S. Coast Guard patrol
256.5 to provide safety for the personnel. On-scene U.S. Coast Guard
10. Protection of Children From participants of the ‘‘Shoals Dragon Boat patrol personnel include commissioned,
Environmental Health Risks Festival.’’ This rule is categorically warrant, and petty officers of the U.S.
We have analyzed this proposed rule excluded from further review under Coast Guard.
under Executive Order 13045, paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Dated: August 13, 2015.
Protection of Children from Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
R.V. Timme,
Environmental Health Risks and Safety environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Risks. This rule is not an economically
Port Ohio Valley.
significant rule and would not create an Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated [FR Doc. 2015–23169 Filed 9–14–15; 8:45 am]
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately under ADDRESSES. We seek any BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

affect children. comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
11. Indian Tribal Governments environmental impact from this ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
This proposed rule does not have proposed rule. AGENCY
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 52
Coordination with Indian Tribal Marine safety, Navigation (water), [EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0565; FRL–9932–85–
Governments, because it would not have Reporting and recordkeeping Region 7]
a substantial direct effect on one or requirements, Waterways.
more Indian tribes, on the relationship For the reasons discussed in the Approval and Promulgation of Air
between the Federal Government and preamble, the U.S. Coast Guard Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of proposes to amend 33 CFR part 100 as Nebraska; Cross-State Air Pollution
power and responsibilities between the follows: Rule
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON AGENCY: Environmental Protection
12. Energy Effects NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS Agency (EPA).
This proposed rule is not a ACTION: Proposed rule.
‘‘significant energy action’’ under ■ 1. The authority citation for part 100
Executive Order 13211, Actions continues to read as follows: SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Concerning Regulations That Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, revisions to the State Implementation
■ 2. A new special local regulation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of
Distribution, or Use because it is not a 100.801T01–0671 is added to read as
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Nebraska in a letter dated March 30,
follows: 2015. This SIP revision provides
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely
to have a significant adverse effect on § 100.801T01–0671 Special Local Nebraska’s state-determined allowance
the supply, distribution, or use of Regulation; Tennessee River Mile 255.0 to allocations for existing electric
energy. The Administrator of the Office River Mile 256.5, Florence, AL. generating units (EGUs) in the State for
of Information and Regulatory Affairs (a) Location. All waters of the the 2016 control periods and replaces
has not designated it as a significant Tennessee River beginning at mile the allowance allocations for the 2016
energy action. Therefore, it does not marker 255.0 and ending at mile marker control periods established by EPA
require a Statement of Energy Effects 256.5 at Florence, AL. under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
under Executive Order 13211. (b) Periods of enforcement. This (CSAPR). The CSAPR addresses the
proposed rule will be enforced from ‘‘good neighbor’’ provision of the Clean
13. Technical Standards 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on October 3, Air Act (CAA or Act) that requires states
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

This proposed rule does not use 2015. The Captain of the Port Ohio to reduce the transport of pollution that
technical standards. Therefore, we did Valley or a designated representative significantly affects downwind air
not consider the use of voluntary will inform the public through quality. In this action EPA is proposing
consensus standards. broadcast notice to mariners of the approval of Nebraska’s SIP revision,
enforcement period for the special local incorporating the state-determined
14. Environment regulation. allocations for the 2016 control periods
We have analyzed this proposed rule (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with into the SIP, and amending the
under Department of Homeland the general regulations in § 100.801 of regulatory text of the CSAPR Federal

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:46 Sep 14, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15SEP1.SGM 15SEP1
Document Created: 2015-12-15 10:09:19
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 10:09:19
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before September 22, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Petty Officer Vera Max, MSD Nashville, Nashville, TN, at 615-736-5421 or at [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl F. Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 55277
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways
80 FR 55277 - Special Local Regulation, Tennessee River, Mile 255.0 to 256.5; Florence, AL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 178 (September 15, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
