80 FR 55595 - Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 179 (September 16, 2015)

Page Range		55595-55596
FR Document		2015-23156

On March 9, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on large residential washers (LRWs) from the Republic of Korea (Korea).\1\ The review covers three producers/ exporters of the subject merchandise: Daewoo Electronics Corporation (Daewoo), LG Electronics, Inc. (LGE), and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Samsung). The period of review (POR) is August 3, 2012, through January 31, 2014. We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. After reviewing the comments received and making corrections to the margin calculations, where appropriate, we continue to find that sales of subject merchandise to the United States have been made at prices below normal value. The final dumping margins for the reviewed companies are listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of the Review.'' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 179 (Wednesday, September 16, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 179 (Wednesday, September 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55595-55596]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23156]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-868]

Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Final
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On March 9, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on large residential washers (LRWs) from
the Republic of Korea (Korea).\1\ The review covers three producers/
exporters of the subject merchandise: Daewoo Electronics Corporation
(Daewoo), LG Electronics, Inc. (LGE), and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
(Samsung). The period of review (POR) is August 3, 2012, through
January 31, 2014. We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment
on the Preliminary Results. After reviewing the comments received and
making corrections to the margin calculations, where appropriate, we
continue to find that sales of subject merchandise to the United States
have been made at prices below normal value. The final dumping margins
for the reviewed companies are listed below in the section entitled
``Final Results of the Review.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ See Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2012-2014, 80 FR 12456 (March 9, 2015) (Preliminary Results).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective date: September 16, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Reza Karamloo, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4136 or (202) 482-4470, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

For a complete description of the events that following the
publication of the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\2\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's AD and
Countervailing Duty (CVD) Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version
of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at
http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and
Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ See memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large Residential
Washers from the Republic of Korea,'' dated concurrently with and
adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order

The products covered by the order are all large residential washers
and certain subassemblies thereof from Korea. The products are
currently classifiable under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 8450.20.0080
of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Products
subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this
scope is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The HTSUS numbers are revised
from the numbers previously stated in the scope. See Memorandum to
The File (MTF) entitled ``Changes to the HTS Numbers to the ACE Case
Reference Files for the Antidumping Duty Orders,'' dated January 6,
2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties
raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is
attached to this notice as Appendix I.

Final Results of the Review

Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to
the weighted-average dumping margin calculation for LGE. No party
submitted comments on the Department's preliminary decision to assign
Daewoo and Samsung a margin based on adverse facts available (AFA) for
their failure to respond to our request for information.\4\ As the
facts with respect to these two respondents remain the same, we made no
changes to the rate assigned to them as AFA in these final results.\5\
Therefore, we are assigning the following weighted-average dumping

[[Page 55596]]

margins for the period August 3, 2012, through January 31, 2014: \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR 12457.
\5\ This rate equals the AFA rate of 82.41 percent adjusted for
export subsidies totaling 3.30 percent assigned to Daewoo in the
final determination of the CVD investigation of LRWs from Korea. See
MTF, entitled ``Source Documentation Relevant to Export Subsidy
Adjustments,'' dated concurrently with this notice, at Attachment I.
\6\ This rate equals the AFA rate of 82.41 percent adjusted for
an export subsidy in the amount of 0.06 percent assigned to Samsung
in the final determination of the CVD investigation of LRWs from
Korea. Id., at Attachment II.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daewoo Electronics Corporation.......................... 79.11
LG Electronics, Inc..................................... 1.52
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd............................ 82.35
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

We intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days
of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), the Department determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final
results of this administrative review.
For those sales where LGE reported the entered value of its U.S.
sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates
based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated
for the examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales
to that importer. For those sales where LGE did not report the entered
value of its U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific customer-
specific per-unit duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount
of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales and dividing
this amount by the total quantity of those sales. To determine whether
the duty assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with the
requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated an
importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on the estimated entered
value. Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis
(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate these entries without regard to antidumping duties pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
For Daewoo's and Samsung's U.S. sales, we based the assessment rate
assigned to the corresponding entries on the weighted-average dumping
margins listed above.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003.\7\ If applicable, this clarification will apply to entries
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by LGE, for which the
company did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United
States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate these
entries at the all-others rate established in the less-than fair-value
(LTFV) investigation, 11.80 percent,\8\ if there is no rate for the
intermediary involved in the transaction. See Assessment Policy Notice
for a full discussion of this clarification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Assessment Policy Notice).
\8\ See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and the Republic
of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013)
(AD Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates
for Daewoo, LGE, and Samsung will be equal to the weighted-average
dumping margins established in the final results of this administrative
review, as shown above; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a
prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to
be the company-specific rate published for the most recently-completed
segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or the original LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer
is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most
recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 11.80 percent, the all-
others rate determined in the LTFV investigation.\9\ These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.

Dated: September, 8, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
MARGIN CALCULATIONS
SCOPE OF THE ORDER
DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUES
1. Exclusion of Sales of Merchandise Entered Prior to Date of
Suspension
2. Whether Defective Merchandise is Outside of the Scope
3. Exclusion of Re-sales of Defective Merchandise
4. Exclusion of Potentially Double-Counted U.S. Sales
5. Methodological Issues in the Differential Pricing Analysis
6. Zeroing
7. Monthly Time Periods in Differential Pricing Analysis
8. Conducting the Sales-Below-Cost-Test Based on Level of Trade
RECOMMENDATION

[FR Doc. 2015-23156 Filed 9-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 179 / Wednesday, September 16, 2015 / Notices 55595

amended Certificate. Comments should SUMMARY: On March 9, 2015, the addition, a complete version of the
refer to this application as ‘‘Export Department of Commerce (the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
Trade Certificate of Review, application Department) published the preliminary be accessed directly at http://
number 99–10A005.’’ results of the administrative review of enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
the antidumping duty (AD) order on The signed Issues and Decision
Summary of the Application large residential washers (LRWs) from Memorandum and the electronic
Applicant: California Almond Export the Republic of Korea (Korea).1 The version of the Issues and Decision
Association, LLC (‘‘CAEA’’), 4800 Sisk review covers three producers/exporters Memorandum are identical in content.
Road, Modesto, CA 95356. of the subject merchandise: Daewoo The Department conducted this
Contact: Bill Morecraft, Chairman, Electronics Corporation (Daewoo), LG administrative review in accordance
Telephone: (916) 446–8537. Electronics, Inc. (LGE), and Samsung with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
Application No.: 99–10A005. Electronics Co., Ltd. (Samsung). The 1930, as amended (the Act).
Date Deemed Submitted: August 31, period of review (POR) is August 3,
2015. Scope of the Order
2012, through January 31, 2014. We
Proposed Amendment: CAEA seeks to gave interested parties an opportunity to The products covered by the order are
amend its Certificate to add the comment on the Preliminary Results. all large residential washers and certain
following company as a Member of After reviewing the comments received subassemblies thereof from Korea. The
CAEA’s Certificate: California Gold and making corrections to the margin products are currently classifiable under
Almonds, Modesto, CA. calculations, where appropriate, we subheadings 8450.20.0040 and
CAEA’s proposed amendment of its continue to find that sales of subject 8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff
Export Trade Certificate of Review merchandise to the United States have System of the United States (HTSUS).
would result in the following companies been made at prices below normal Products subject to this order may also
as Members under the Certificate: value. The final dumping margins for enter under HTSUS subheadings
Almonds California Pride, Inc., the reviewed companies are listed 8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080,
Caruthers, CA below in the section entitled ‘‘Final 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000.
Baldwin-Minkler Farms, Orland, CA Results of the Review.’’ Although the HTSUS subheadings are
Blue Diamond Growers, Sacramento, CA DATES: Effective date: September 16, provided for convenience and customs
California Gold Almonds, Modesto, CA 2015. purposes, the written description of the
Campos Brothers, Caruthers, CA merchandise subject to this scope is
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: dispositive.3
Chico Nut Company, Chico, CA
Del Rio Nut Company, Inc., Livingston, David Goldberger or Reza Karamloo,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Analysis of Comments Received
CA
Fair Trade Corner, Inc., Chico, CA Enforcement and Compliance, All issues raised in the case and
Fisher Nut Company, Modesto, CA International Trade Administration, rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Hilltop Ranch, Inc., Ballico, CA U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
Hughson Nut, Inc., Hughson, CA Street and Constitution Avenue NW., list of the issues which parties raised
Mariani Nut Company, Winters, CA Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) and to which we respond in the Issues
Nutco, LLC d.b.a. Spycher Brothers, 482–4136 or (202) 482–4470, and Decision Memorandum is attached
Turlock, CA respectively. to this notice as Appendix I.
Paramount Farms, Inc., Los Angeles, CA SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Final Results of the Review
P–R Farms, Inc., Clovis, CA
Roche Brothers International Family Background Based on our analysis of the
Nut Co., Escalon, CA For a complete description of the comments received, we made changes to
RPAC Almonds, LLC, Los Banos, CA events that following the publication of the weighted-average dumping margin
South Valley Almond Company, LLC, the Preliminary Results, see the Issues calculation for LGE. No party submitted
Wasco, CA and Decision Memorandum.2 The Issues comments on the Department’s
Sunny Gem, LLC, Wasco, CA and Decision Memorandum is a public preliminary decision to assign Daewoo
Western Nut Company, Chico, CA document and is on file electronically and Samsung a margin based on adverse
via Enforcement and Compliance’s AD facts available (AFA) for their failure to
Dated: September 10, 2015.
and Countervailing Duty (CVD) respond to our request for information.4
Joseph Flynn, As the facts with respect to these two
Centralized Electronic Service System
Director, Office of Trade and Economic respondents remain the same, we made
Analysis, International Trade Administration.
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at http:// no changes to the rate assigned to them
[FR Doc. 2015–23223 Filed 9–15–15; 8:45 am] as AFA in these final results.5
access.trade.gov and in the Central
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Therefore, we are assigning the
Department of Commerce building. In following weighted-average dumping
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1 See Large Residential Washers From the 3 A full description of the scope of the order is

Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of the contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
International Trade Administration Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– The HTSUS numbers are revised from the numbers
2014, 80 FR 12456 (March 9, 2015) (Preliminary previously stated in the scope. See Memorandum to
[A–580–868] The File (MTF) entitled ‘‘Changes to the HTS
asabaliauskas on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Results).
2 See memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Numbers to the ACE Case Reference Files for the
Large Residential Washers From the Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Antidumping Duty Orders,’’ dated January 6, 2015.
4 See Preliminary Results, 80 FR 12457.
Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant
5 This rate equals the AFA rate of 82.41 percent
Antidumping Duty Administrative Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for adjusted for export subsidies totaling 3.30 percent
Review; 2012–2014 the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty assigned to Daewoo in the final determination of
Administrative Review of Large Residential the CVD investigation of LRWs from Korea. See
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Washers from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated MTF, entitled ‘‘Source Documentation Relevant to
International Trade Administration, concurrently with and adopted by this notice Export Subsidy Adjustments,’’ dated concurrently
Department of Commerce. (Issues and Decision Memorandum). with this notice, at Attachment I.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Sep 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM 16SEN1

55596 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 179 / Wednesday, September 16, 2015 / Notices

margins for the period August 3, 2012, For Daewoo’s and Samsung’s U.S. Notification to Importers
through January 31, 2014: 6 sales, we based the assessment rate
assigned to the corresponding entries on This notice also serves as a final
Weighted- the weighted-average dumping margins reminder to importers of their
average listed above. responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
Manufacturer/exporter dumping to file a certificate regarding the
margin The Department clarified its
(percent) reimbursement of antidumping and/or
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
countervailing duties prior to
Daewoo Electronics Corpora-
May 6, 2003.7 If applicable, this
clarification will apply to entries of liquidation of the relevant entries
tion .................................... 79.11 during this review period. Failure to
LG Electronics, Inc ............... 1.52 subject merchandise during the POR
produced by LGE, for which the comply with this requirement could
Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd ..................................... 82.35 company did not know that its result in the Secretary’s presumption
merchandise was destined for the that reimbursement of antidumping
Disclosure and Public Comment United States. In such instances, we will and/or countervailing duties occurred
instruct CBP to liquidate these entries at and the subsequent assessment of
We intend to disclose the calculations double antidumping duties.
the all-others rate established in the
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in less-than fair-value (LTFV) Notification Regarding Administrative
this proceeding in accordance with 19 investigation, 11.80 percent,8 if there is Protective Order
CFR 351.224(b). no rate for the intermediary involved in
the transaction. See Assessment Policy This notice serves as the only
Assessment Rates Notice for a full discussion of this reminder to parties subject to
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the clarification. administrative protective order (APO) of
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the their responsibility concerning the
Cash Deposit Requirements
Department determined, and U.S. disposition of proprietary information
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) The following deposit requirements disclosed under APO in accordance
shall assess, antidumping duties on all will be effective upon publication of the with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
appropriate entries of subject notice of final results of administrative written notification of return/
merchandise in accordance with the review for all shipments of the subject destruction of APO materials or
final results of this review. The merchandise entered, or withdrawn conversion to judicial protective order is
Department intends to issue appropriate from warehouse, for consumption on or hereby requested. Failure to comply
assessment instructions directly to CBP after the date of publication, as provided with the regulations and the terms of an
15 days after publication of the final by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) APO is a sanctionable violation.
results of this administrative review. The cash deposit rates for Daewoo, LGE, This notice is published in
For those sales where LGE reported and Samsung will be equal to the accordance with section 751(a)(1) and
the entered value of its U.S. sales, we weighted-average dumping margins 777(i)(1) of the Act.
calculated importer-specific ad valorem established in the final results of this
duty assessment rates based on the ratio administrative review, as shown above; Dated: September, 8, 2015.
of the total amount of antidumping (2) for merchandise exported by Paul Piquado,
duties calculated for the examined sales manufacturers or exporters not covered Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
to the total entered value of the in this administrative review but Compliance.
examined sales to that importer. For covered in a prior segment of the
those sales where LGE did not report the Appendix I
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
entered value of its U.S. sales, we continue to be the company-specific rate List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
calculated importer-specific customer- published for the most recently- Decision Memorandum
specific per-unit duty assessment rates completed segment; (3) if the exporter is SUMMARY
by aggregating the total amount of not a firm covered in this review, a prior BACKGROUND
antidumping duties calculated for the review, or the original LTFV MARGIN CALCULATIONS
examined sales and dividing this investigation, but the manufacturer is, SCOPE OF THE ORDER
amount by the total quantity of those the cash deposit rate will be the rate DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUES
sales. To determine whether the duty established for the most recently- 1. Exclusion of Sales of Merchandise
assessment rate is de minimis, in completed segment of this proceeding Entered Prior to Date of Suspension
accordance with the requirement set for the manufacturer of the 2. Whether Defective Merchandise is
forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit Outside of the Scope
calculated an importer-specific ad rate for all other manufacturers or 3. Exclusion of Re-sales of Defective
valorem ratio based on the estimated exporters will continue to be 11.80 Merchandise
entered value. Where an importer- percent, the all-others rate determined 4. Exclusion of Potentially Double-Counted
specific assessment rate is zero or de in the LTFV investigation.9 These cash U.S. Sales
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the deposit requirements, when imposed, 5. Methodological Issues in the Differential
Department will instruct CBP to shall remain in effect until further Pricing Analysis
asabaliauskas on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

liquidate these entries without regard to notice. 6. Zeroing
antidumping duties pursuant to 19 CFR 7. Monthly Time Periods in Differential
351.106(c)(2). 7 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Pricing Analysis
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 8. Conducting the Sales-Below-Cost-Test
6 This rate equals the AFA rate of 82.41 percent FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). Based on Level of Trade
8 See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and
adjusted for an export subsidy in the amount of 0.06 RECOMMENDATION
percent assigned to Samsung in the final the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders,
78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013) (AD Order). [FR Doc. 2015–23156 Filed 9–15–15; 8:45 am]
determination of the CVD investigation of LRWs
from Korea. Id., at Attachment II. 9 Id. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Sep 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM 16SEN1

Document Created: 2018-02-26 10:16:26
Document Modified: 2018-02-26 10:16:26

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Dates		Effective date: September 16, 2015.
Contact		David Goldberger or Reza Karamloo, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 4136 or (202) 482-4470, respectively.
FR Citation		80 FR 55595

80 FR 55595 - Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEInternational Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 179 (September 16, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration