80 FR 55872 - Certain Marine Sonar Imaging Systems, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof; Commission Determination to Review a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest and Bonding

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 180 (September 17, 2015)

Page Range		55872-55874
FR Document		2015-23329

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review the final initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') on July 13, 2015, finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), as to certain asserted patent claims in this investigation.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 180 (Thursday, September 17, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 180 (Thursday, September 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55872-55874]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23329]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-926]

Certain Marine Sonar Imaging Systems, Products Containing the
Same, and Components Thereof; Commission Determination to Review a
Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337;
Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and
on Remedy, the Public Interest and Bonding

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

[[Page 55873]]

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review the final initial determination
(``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') on
July 13, 2015, finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), as to certain asserted patent claims
in this investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on August 21, 2014, based on a complaint filed by Johnson Outdoors lnc.
of Racine, Wisconsin and Johnson Outdoors Marine Electronics, Inc. of
Eufaula, Alabama (collectively, ``Johnson Outdoors''). 79 FR 49536
(Aug. 21, 2014). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of certain marine sonar imaging
systems, products containing the same, and components thereof by reason
of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 2, 17, 25, 26, 31, 32, 35,
36, 41-43, 53, and 56 of U.S. Patent No. 7,652,952 (``the '952
patent''); claims 1, 5, 7, 8, 21, 22, 24, 25, 28, and 29 of U.S. Patent
No. 7,710,825 (``the '825 patent''); and claims 14, 18, 21-23, 25, and
33 of U.S. Patent No. 7,755,974 (``the '974 patent''). Id. The notice
of investigation named the following respondents: Garmin International,
Inc.; Garmin North America, Inc.; Garmin USA, Inc. all of Olathe,
Kansas; and Garmin Corporation of New Taipei City, Taiwan
(collectively, ``Garmin''). Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations is not a party to the investigation.
On January 30, 2015, the parties entered into a stipulation that
the domestic industry requirement was met. The parties also agreed to a
stipulation regarding importation of Garmin accused products. That same
day, Johnson Outdoors filed two unopposed motions for summary
determination: (1) That Garmin's importation and sales satisfy the
importation requirement and (2) that Johnson Outdoors satisfies the
domestic industry requirement. On March 24, 2015, the ALJ granted
Johnson Outdoors' summary determination motions in Order Nos. 14 and
15, respectively. The Commission determined not to review. See Notice
of Commission Determination Not to Review Two Initial Determinations
Granting Unopposed Motions for Summary Determinations of Importation
and the Existence of a Domestic Industry That Practices the Asserted
Patents (April 22, 2015).
On July 13, 2015, the ALJ issued his final ID, finding a violation
of section 337 by Garmin in connection with claims 14, 18, 21, 22, 23,
and 33 of the '974 patent. The ALJ found no violation of section 337 in
connection with the asserted claims of the '952 and '825 patents; and
claim 25 of the '974 patent. Specifically, the ALJ found that the
Commission has subject matter jurisdiction, in rem jurisdiction over
the accused products, and in personam jurisdiction over Garmin. ID at
21. The ALJ further found that the accused products infringe asserted
claims 14, 18, 21, 22, 23, and 33 of the '974 patent but do not
infringe the asserted claims of the '952 and '825 patents or claim 25
of the '974 patent. See ID at 55-57, 58-59, 60-62. The ALJ also found
that Garmin failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that
the asserted claims of the '952, '825, or '974 patents were anticipated
or rendered obvious by the cited prior art references. See id. at 68-
80, 89-100. Finally, the ALJ found that the '952, '825, and '974
patents are not unenforceable due to inequitable conduct and that
the'952 patent is not invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(f) for derivation. ID
at 80-83, 100-109.
On July 27, 2015, Garmin filed a petition for review of the ID.
That same day, Johnson Outdoors filed a contingent petition for review
of the ID. On August 4, 2015, the parties filed responses to the
petitions.
Having examined the record of this investigation, including the
ALJ's final ID, the petitions for review, and the responses thereto,
the Commission has determined to review the final ID on all issues
petitioned.
The parties are requested to provide any comments they may have as
to the Commission's proposed construction below with reference to the
applicable law and the evidentiary record. In connection with its
review, the Commission is particularly interested in a response to the
following:

If the Commission were to construe the claim term ``mounted to a
boat'' to mean ``proximately secured to the boat in a fixed
manner,'' please discuss any impact this construction may have on
the ID's findings.

In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of
the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2)
issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in the
respondent being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair
acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the
Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address
the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks
exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes
other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and
provide information establishing that activities involving other types
of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For
background, see Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via Telephone
Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994)
(Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in
the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve
or disapprove the Commission's action. See Presidential Memorandum of
July 21, 2005. 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). During this period, the
subject articles would be entitled to enter the United

[[Page 55874]]

States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of
the bond that should be imposed if a remedy is ordered.
Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation are requested
to file written submissions on the issues identified in this notice.
Parties to the investigation, interested government agencies, and any
other interested parties are encouraged to file written submissions on
the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Such
submissions should address the recommended determination by the ALJ on
remedy and bonding. Complainants are requested to submit proposed
remedial orders for the Commission's consideration. Complainants are
also requested to state the date that the patents expire and the HTSUS
numbers under which the accused products are imported. Complainants are
further requested to supply the names of known importers of the Garmin
products at issue in this investigation. The written submissions and
proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than close of business
on September 21, 2015. Reply submissions must be filed no later than
the close of business on September 28, 2015. Such submissions should
address the ALJ's recommended determinations on remedy and bonding. No
further submissions on any of these issues will be permitted unless
otherwise ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit eight
true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day
pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the
investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-926'') in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions
regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000).
Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. A
redacted non-confidential version of the document must also be filed
simultaneously with any confidential filing. All non-confidential
written submissions will be available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 11, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-23329 Filed 9-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

55872 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Notices

TEXAS rolled steel flat products that are imports of cold-rolled steel flat products
Dallas County allegedly subsidized by the governments from Brazil, China, India, Korea, and
of Brazil, China, Korea, and Russia. The Russia and LTFV imports of cold-rolled
Lamar—McKinney Bridge, (Road
Infrastructure of Texas, 1866–1965 MPS) Commission also determines, pursuant steel flat products from Brazil, China,
Across Trinity R. at Continental Ave., to the Act, that there is a reasonable India, Japan, Korea, Netherlands,
Dallas, 15000708 indication that an industry in the Russia, and the United Kingdom.
United States is threatened with Accordingly, effective July 28, 2015, the
WISCONSIN
material injury by reason of imports of Commission, pursuant to sections 703(a)
Brown County cold-rolled steel flat products that are and 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
Nicolet High School, 111 3rd St., De Pere, allegedly subsidized by the government U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)), instituted
15000703 of India. countervailing duty investigation Nos.
The Commission further determines 701–TA–540–544 and antidumping
Door County
that imports of cold-rolled steel flat duty investigation Nos. 731–TA–1283–
HANOVER (schooner) Shipwreck, (Great products from the Netherlands are
Lakes Shipwreck Sites of Wisconsin MPS) 1290 (Preliminary).
negligible pursuant to section 771(24) of Notice of the institution of the
1.75 mi. NW. of Fish Cr., Gibralter,
15000710 the Act, and its investigation with Commission’s investigations and of a
regard to cold-rolled steel flat products public conference to be held in
UCCESS (scow schooner) Shipwreck, (Great
Lakes Shipwreck Sites of Wisconsin MPS) from this country is thereby terminated connection therewith was given by
.13 mi. SW. of Whitefish Dunes State Park, pursuant to section 733(a)(1) of the Act. posting copies of the notice in the Office
Sevastopal, 15000711 Commencement of Final Phase of the Secretary, U.S. International
Manitowoc County Investigations Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
PATHFINDER (schooner) Shipwreck, (Great Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
Lakes Shipwreck Sites of Wisconsin MPS)
Federal Register of August 3, 2015 (80
Commission’s rules, the Commission
2.6 mi. N. of Rawley Point Lighthouse, FR 46047). The conference was held in
also gives notice of the commencement
Two Creeks, 15000712 Washington, DC, on August 18, 2015,
of the final phase of its investigations.
and all persons who requested the
Marinette County The Commission will issue a final phase
opportunity were permitted to appear in
Brown, Mary and Harry, House, 1931 notice of scheduling, which will be
person or by counsel.
Riverside Ave., Marinette, 15000713 published in the Federal Register as
The Commission made these
[FR Doc. 2015–23316 Filed 9–16–15; 8:45 am] provided in section 207.21 of the
determinations pursuant to sections
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P Commission’s rules, upon notice from
703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff Act of
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)).
preliminary determinations in the It completed and filed its
INTERNATIONAL TRADE determinations in these investigations
COMMISSION investigations under sections 703(b) or
733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary on September 11, 2015. The views of the
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–540–544 and determinations are negative, upon Commission are contained in USITC
731–TA–1283–1290 (Preliminary)] notice of affirmative final Publication 4564 (September 2015),
determinations in those investigations entitled Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products
Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From from Brazil, China, India, Japan, Korea,
Brazil, China, India, Japan, Korea, under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the
Act. Parties that filed entries of Netherlands, Russia, and the United
Netherlands, Russia, and the United Kingdom: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–
Kingdom appearance in the preliminary phase of
the investigations need not enter a 540–544 and 731–TA–1283–1290
Determinations separate appearance for the final phase (Preliminary).
of the investigations. Industrial users, By order of the Commission.
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United and, if the merchandise under Issued: September 11, 2015.
States International Trade Commission investigation is sold at the retail level, Lisa R. Barton,
(‘‘Commission’’) determines,2 pursuant representative consumer organizations Secretary to the Commission.
to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), have the right to appear as parties in [FR Doc. 2015–23325 Filed 9–16–15; 8:45 am]
that there is a reasonable indication that Commission antidumping and BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
an industry in the United States is countervailing duty investigations. The
materially injured by reason of imports Secretary will prepare a public service
of cold-rolled steel flat products from list containing the names and addresses INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Brazil, China, India, Japan, Korea, of all persons, or their representatives, COMMISSION
Russia, and the United Kingdom, who are parties to the investigations.
provided for in subheadings 7209.15, Background [Investigation No. 337–TA–926]
7209.16, 7209.17, 7209.18, 7209.25, On July 28, 2015, AK Steel
7209.26, 7209.27, 7209.28, 7209.90, Certain Marine Sonar Imaging
Corporation (West Chester, Ohio), Systems, Products Containing the
7210.70, 7211.23, 7211.29, 7211.90, ArcelorMittal USA LLC (Chicago,
7212.40, 7225.50, 7225.99, and 7226.92 Same, and Components Thereof;
Illinois), Nucor Corporation (Charlotte, Commission Determination to Review
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of North Carolina), Steel Dynamics, Inc.
the United States, that are allegedly sold a Final Initial Determination Finding a
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

(Fort Wayne, Indiana), and United Violation of Section 337; Schedule for
in the United States at less than fair States Steel Corporation (Pittsburgh,
value (‘‘LTFV’’), and by imports of cold- Filing Written Submissions on the
Pennsylvania) filed a petition with the Issues Under Review and on Remedy,
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission and Commerce, alleging the Public Interest and Bonding
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 that an industry in the United States is
CFR 207.2(f)). materially injured or threatened with AGENCY:U.S. International Trade
2 Commissioner F. Scott Kieff not participating. material injury by reason of subsidized Commission.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM 17SEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Notices 55873

ACTION: Notice. (collectively, ‘‘Garmin’’). Id. The Office determined to review the final ID on all
of Unfair Import Investigations is not a issues petitioned.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that party to the investigation. The parties are requested to provide
the U.S. International Trade On January 30, 2015, the parties any comments they may have as to the
Commission has determined to review entered into a stipulation that the Commission’s proposed construction
the final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) domestic industry requirement was met. below with reference to the applicable
issued by the presiding administrative The parties also agreed to a stipulation law and the evidentiary record. In
law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on July 13, 2015, regarding importation of Garmin connection with its review, the
finding a violation of section 337 of the accused products. That same day, Commission is particularly interested in
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 Johnson Outdoors filed two unopposed a response to the following:
U.S.C. 1337), as to certain asserted motions for summary determination: (1) If the Commission were to construe the
patent claims in this investigation. That Garmin’s importation and sales claim term ‘‘mounted to a boat’’ to mean
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: satisfy the importation requirement and ‘‘proximately secured to the boat in a fixed
Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General (2) that Johnson Outdoors satisfies the manner,’’ please discuss any impact this
Counsel, U.S. International Trade domestic industry requirement. On construction may have on the ID’s findings.
Commission, 500 E Street SW., March 24, 2015, the ALJ granted In connection with the final
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– Johnson Outdoors’ summary disposition of this investigation, the
205–3042. Copies of non-confidential determination motions in Order Nos. 14 Commission may (1) issue an order that
documents filed in connection with this and 15, respectively. The Commission could result in the exclusion of the
investigation are or will be available for determined not to review. See Notice of subject articles from entry into the
inspection during official business Commission Determination Not to United States, and/or (2) issue one or
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Review Two Initial Determinations more cease and desist orders that could
Office of the Secretary, U.S. Granting Unopposed Motions for result in the respondent being required
International Trade Commission, 500 E Summary Determinations of Importation to cease and desist from engaging in
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, and the Existence of a Domestic unfair acts in the importation and sale
telephone 202–205–2000. General Industry That Practices the Asserted of such articles. Accordingly, the
information concerning the Commission Patents (April 22, 2015). Commission is interested in receiving
may also be obtained by accessing its On July 13, 2015, the ALJ issued his written submissions that address the
Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). final ID, finding a violation of section form of remedy, if any, that should be
The public record for this investigation 337 by Garmin in connection with ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an
may be viewed on the Commission’s claims 14, 18, 21, 22, 23, and 33 of the article from entry into the United States
electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// ’974 patent. The ALJ found no violation for purposes other than entry for
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired of section 337 in connection with the consumption, the party should so
persons are advised that information on asserted claims of the ’952 and ’825 indicate and provide information
this matter can be obtained by patents; and claim 25 of the ’974 patent. establishing that activities involving
contacting the Commission’s TDD Specifically, the ALJ found that the other types of entry either are adversely
terminal on 202–205–1810. Commission has subject matter affecting it or likely to do so. For
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The jurisdiction, in rem jurisdiction over the background, see Certain Devices for
Commission instituted this investigation accused products, and in personam Connecting Computers via Telephone
on August 21, 2014, based on a jurisdiction over Garmin. ID at 21. The Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC
complaint filed by Johnson Outdoors ALJ further found that the accused Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994)
lnc. of Racine, Wisconsin and Johnson products infringe asserted claims 14, 18, (Commission Opinion).
Outdoors Marine Electronics, Inc. of 21, 22, 23, and 33 of the ’974 patent but If the Commission contemplates some
Eufaula, Alabama (collectively, do not infringe the asserted claims of form of remedy, it must consider the
‘‘Johnson Outdoors’’). 79 FR 49536 the ’952 and ’825 patents or claim 25 of effects of that remedy upon the public
(Aug. 21, 2014). The complaint alleges the ’974 patent. See ID at 55–57, 58–59, interest. The factors the Commission
violations of section 337 of the Tariff 60–62. The ALJ also found that Garmin will consider include the effect that an
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. failed to establish by clear and exclusion order and/or cease and desist
1337), in the importation into the convincing evidence that the asserted orders would have on (1) the public
United States, the sale for importation, claims of the ’952, ’825, or ’974 patents health and welfare, (2) competitive
and the sale within the United States were anticipated or rendered obvious by conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.
after importation of certain marine sonar the cited prior art references. See id. at production of articles that are like or
imaging systems, products containing 68–80, 89–100. Finally, the ALJ found directly competitive with those that are
the same, and components thereof by that the ’952, ’825, and ’974 patents are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
reason of infringement of one or more of not unenforceable due to inequitable consumers. The Commission is
claims 1, 2, 17, 25, 26, 31, 32, 35, 36, conduct and that the’952 patent is not therefore interested in receiving written
41–43, 53, and 56 of U.S. Patent No. invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(f) for submissions that address the
7,652,952 (‘‘the ’952 patent’’); claims 1, derivation. ID at 80–83, 100–109. aforementioned public interest factors
5, 7, 8, 21, 22, 24, 25, 28, and 29 of U.S. On July 27, 2015, Garmin filed a in the context of this investigation.
Patent No. 7,710,825 (‘‘the ’825 patent’’); petition for review of the ID. That same If the Commission orders some form
and claims 14, 18, 21–23, 25, and 33 of day, Johnson Outdoors filed a of remedy, the U.S. Trade
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

U.S. Patent No. 7,755,974 (‘‘the ’974 contingent petition for review of the ID. Representative, as delegated by the
patent’’). Id. The notice of investigation On August 4, 2015, the parties filed President, has 60 days to approve or
named the following respondents: responses to the petitions. disapprove the Commission’s action.
Garmin International, Inc.; Garmin Having examined the record of this See Presidential Memorandum of July
North America, Inc.; Garmin USA, Inc. investigation, including the ALJ’s final 21, 2005. 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005).
all of Olathe, Kansas; and Garmin ID, the petitions for review, and the During this period, the subject articles
Corporation of New Taipei City, Taiwan responses thereto, the Commission has would be entitled to enter the United

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM 17SEN1

Document Created: 2015-12-15 09:34:06
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 09:34:06

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice.
Contact		Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3042. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205- 1810.
FR Citation		80 FR 55872