80 FR 56471 - Bethesda Campus Chilled Water System Improvements Record of Decision
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 181 (September 18, 2015)
National Institutes of Health
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 181 (September 18, 2015)
| Page Range | 56471-56474 | |
| FR Document | 2015-23487 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 181 (Friday, September 18, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 56471-56474] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-23487] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Bethesda Campus Chilled Water System Improvements Record of Decision SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has decided, after completion of a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and a thorough consideration of the public comments on the Draft EIS, to implement the Proposed Action, referred to as the Proposed Action in the Final EIS. This action is to install a Thermal Energy Storage System and an Industrial Water Storage System to provide sufficient storage capacity to meet two days of chilled water demand and two days of industrial water demand should an outside disturbance interrupt the water supply. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie Nottingham, Deputy Director, DEP, ORF, NIH, Building 13, Room 2S11, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, Phone 301-496-7775, [email protected]. Responsible Official: Daniel G. Wheeland, Director, Office of Research Facilities (ORF) Development and Operations, NIH. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Decision After careful review of the environmental consequences in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Chilled Water System Improvements, National Institutes of Health, and consideration of public comment throughout the NEPA process, the NIH has decided to implement the Proposed Action described below as the Selected Alternative. Selected Alternative The Selected Alternative would implement chilled water system improvements that would enable the NIH to adequately accomplish the project goals. This would include sufficient storage capacity to meet two days of chilled water demand and two days of industrial water demand should an outside disturbance interrupt the normal supply of water by the WSSC. Elements of the Chilled Water System Improvements project that the NIH would implement under the Proposed Action include the following: Thermal Energy Storage System This system would be located at the Building 34 site and would store up to approximately nine million gallons of chilled water. Components of the system would include a storage tank, at or partially below-grade, with a footprint of approximately 12,000 SF; a pump house building with a footprint of approximately 5,000 SF or less; support equipment, such as pumps, valves, piping, controls, and an emergency generator; and security fencing, lighting, and other site improvements. The NIH would use this system to meet chilled water demands within the Campus. Industrial Water Storage System This system would be located at the Parking Lot 41 site and would store up to approximately five million gallons of industrial water. Industrial water is water that the CUP utilizes to generate steam or chilled water. Components of the system would include a storage tank, partially below-grade; a pump house building with a footprint of approximately 5,000 SF; support equipment, such as pumps, valves, variable frequency drivers, electrical equipment, switchgear, piping, controls, instrumentation, and an emergency generator; and security fencing, lighting, and other site improvements. The NIH would use this system to ensure an adequate supply of water to the chillers. Other Supporting Infrastructure The Thermal Energy Storage System and the Industrial Water Storage System [[Page 56472]] would each require new or upgraded utility infrastructure at locations outside the limit of disturbance for each system. Potential locations for many components of this infrastructure have been identified during the planning process. However, precise details including piping locations and sizes are not fully developed. Examples of the types of infrastructure that the NIH may install or upgrade include additional equipment (e.g., pumps, variable frequency drives, electrical equipment, switchgear, emergency generator, control valves, backflow preventers, pressure reducing valves, controls, and instrumentation); other utility buildings; aboveground or buried piping; aboveground or buried utilities; and site improvements (e.g., repairs to existing features, new concrete slabs). Alternatives Considered The Proposed Action, Alternative Action and No Action Alternative were the three alternatives analyzed in the Final EIS. The Alternative Action would implement water infrastructure improvements that would enable the NIH to adequately accomplish the project goals. The characteristics, features, and location of the Thermal Energy Storage System would be identical to the Proposed Action. What separates the Alternative Action from the Proposed is the proposal of the Potable Water Storage System. The Potable Water Storage System would store up to nine million gallons of potable water to ensure an adequate supply of industrial water to the chillers and for potable water requirements on the Campus. The proposed location for the Potable Water Storage System would be the same as that described for the Industrial Water Storage System under the Proposed Action. The characteristics and components of the Potable Water Storage System would be similar to the Industrial Water Storage System, except that the storage tank would be larger. The tank would be about 90 feet in height, which is similar to the planned height of MLP-12 once fully built. The pump house, support equipment, and utilities and site improvements would otherwise be identical to the described features of the Industrial Water Storage Tank. Factors Involved in the Decision The NIH prefers the Proposed Action over the Alternative Action because the Alternative Action would require the NIH to become a continuous water source, which would incur more upfront and ongoing costs for treatment, maintenance, and monitoring of the campus potable water system. Additionally, relative to the Alternative Action, the Proposed Action would retain more connections to WSSC water mains (for redundancy), would not require installation and operation of pumps to maintain adequate pressure for fire service, would maintain existing flow dynamics of potable water within the Campus, and would require less construction (and therefore pose less potential for construction- related impacts to campus neighbors). Resources Impacted The Final EIS describes potential environmental effects of the Selected Alternative. These potential effects are documented in Chapter 3 of the Final EIS. Any potential adverse environmental effects will be avoided or mitigated through design elements, procedures, and compliance with regulatory and NIH requirements. Potential impacts on air quality are all within government standards (federal, state, and local). NIH does not expect significant negative effects on the environment or on the citizens of Bethesda from construction and operation at NIH. Summary of Impacts The following is a summary of potential impacts resulting from the Selected Alternative that the NIH considered when making its decision. No adverse cumulative effects have been identified during the NEPA process. Likewise, no unavoidable or adverse impacts from implementation of the Selected Action have been identified. The Selected Action will be beneficial to the long-term productivity of the national and world health communities. Biomedical research conducted at the NIH facility will have the potential to advance techniques in disease prevention, develop disease immunizations, and prepare defenses against naturally emerging and re-emerging diseases and against bioweapons. Additionally, the local community will benefit from increased employment, income and, government and public finance. Housing Implementation of the Selected Alternative would result in temporary minor impacts on the population and the availability of housing, due to construction workers who might temporarily relocate to the area. Education Educational resources in the area surrounding the Campus include public schools, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (located on NSA Bethesda), and the Foundation for Advanced Education in the Sciences (located at 9109 Old Georgetown Road). Public schools near the Campus include three high schools, five middle schools, and nineteen elementary schools. Implementation of the Selected Alternative will not have a significant impact to education. Transportation Implementation of the Selected Alternative would result in minor temporary impacts to off-campus roads, transit, and traffic due to construction activities. This would include additional traffic due to construction vehicles as well as shifts in employee traffic patterns. Implementation of the Selected Alternative would involve the construction of approximately 1-3 parking spaces to accommodate access for operation or maintenance vehicles. The construction of the Industrial Water Storage System would reduce parking capacity at Parking Lot 41 by approximately 90 parking spaces. In total, this will lead to a net decrease of approximately 90 parking spaces. Security Implantation of the Selected Alternative may have the NIH install security fencing to prevent unauthorized access to the tanks. There would be no significant impacts to security. Employment The Selected Alternative would result in minor benefits to the local economy during construction activities (e.g., meals and incidentals for construction workers). The Proposed Action would not result in a permanent change in job availability at the Campus or associated effects on the local economy. Environmental Justice Bethesda as a whole has relatively low proportions of minority, or low-income populations. Although there are areas of higher minority populations (30 to 35 percent) adjacent to the Campus, the percent minority is still low relative to Montgomery County (40.5 percent) and Maryland (37.9 percent). Impacts to social resources such as population and housing would be minor and temporary. Visual Quality The Selected Alternative would result in minor adverse impacts to external viewscapes. Existing topographical features and vegetation that largely block many potential views from adjacent neighborhoods would not be significantly altered as a result of the Selected Alternative. [[Page 56473]] The Selected Alternative would result in minor to moderate adverse impacts to internal viewscapes. The construction of the Industrial Water Storage System would require removal of a grassy area with trees. This would result in a minor negative impact to the visual character of that area of the Campus. The construction of the Thermal Energy Storage System would have a moderate adverse impact, as the associated tank would be viewable from the central part of the Campus. Also, implementation of the Selected Alternative could result in removal of existing trees and vegetation from the Building 34 site that currently reduces views from the north. The scale of this potential impact is somewhat tempered as the tank would be adjacent to a parking garage and the CUP, so it would not be entirely out of character with surrounding structures. Under the Selected Alternative, all structures would be constructed to a height that does not exceed the Master Plan building height guidance. Construction of the Industrial Water Storage System into the hillside slope near Parking Lot 41 would be consistent with Master Plan guidance for minimizing the visual impact of new construction. Noise Implementation of the Selected Alternative would result in temporary minor noise impacts due to construction activities as well as long-term moderate noise impacts due to operational changes at the CUP. Air Quality Implementation of the Selected Alternative would result in minor direct and indirect impacts to air quality. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Construction and demolition activities would generate temporary greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, while periodic emergency generator use, would generate recurring GHG emissions. Current GHG methodologies outlined in the TSD do not describe how to account for construction activities; therefore, they are not included in the current NIH GHG inventory. NIH would strive to minimize GHG emissions by implementing construction, renovation, and demolition best practices. Stormwater Temporary Construction Impacts Implementation of the Selected Alternative would result in minor temporary impacts to stormwater quantity and quality due to earth disturbances during construction activities. The Limit of Disturbance (LOD) for the Selected Alternative would be approximately 467,000 SF of earth during construction activities. Potential erosion and sediment runoff impacts would be mitigated through stormwater management, including the development of an erosion and sediment control plan that is approved by MDE. The construction of the Thermal Energy Storage System and Industrial Water Storage System would each disturb more than one acre and therefore would obtain coverage under the MDE 2014 General Permit for Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity. As a result, construction activities under the Proposed Action would have a minor impact on stormwater quality. Long-Term Stormwater Management Implementation of the Selected Alternative would result in minor long-term stormwater management impacts. The Selected Alternative would increase impervious surface at the Campus by approximately 153,000 SF, which would increase runoff within the Rock Creek Watershed relative to baseline conditions. However, the construction of the Thermal Energy Storage System and Industrial Water Storage System would each disturb greater than 5,000 SF, and therefore site design would be required to meet The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007) Section 438 requirements to restore each site to predevelopment conditions. This requirement would minimize hydrologic impacts resulting from increased stormwater runoff volumes, such as damage to storm sewer infrastructure, increased likelihood of flooding, and increased erosion. The Selected Alternative would require permanent site stormwater management to control runoff and provide water quality treatment per federal and Maryland stormwater regulations. Long-term stormwater management facilities would be designed and installed per an MDE approved stormwater management plan. The NIH would incorporate appropriate and feasible Environmental Site Design (ESD) practices into the project designs to restore the predevelopment hydrology to the maximum extent technically feasible. Overall, these ESD practices would reduce runoff volume and rate, disperse flow, remove pollutants, and provide for groundwater recharge by facilitating infiltration into the soil. Construction of the Industrial Water Storage System and Thermal Energy Storage System would likely incorporate bioretention areas including stormwater planter boxes. These vegetated areas would infiltrate runoff from impervious surfaces at the site, reducing the quantity of stormwater runoff and improving the water quality. The Selected Alternative would not impact coverage under the Campus's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, MS4 permit. Historic Resources Construction of the Thermal Energy Storage System and associated infrastructure would result in temporary construction impacts (e.g., noise) and a permanent change in the appearance of the Building 34 site. These impacts would be perceptible from the rear of the historic Biologics Standards Laboratory and Annex (Buildings 29 and 29A), located north of the project site. The new infrastructure would also result in a minor change in the appearance of the Campus when viewed from the historic National Library of Medicine (NLM) complex (Buildings 38 and 38A). Additionally, construction of the Industrial Water Storage System may result in a minor change in the appearance of the Campus when viewed from the upper levels of Building 38A. Construction of these new facilities, however, would not affect the integrity of setting of these historic properties; would not obscure or compromise their original design intent; and would not otherwise affect the characteristics that qualify these historic properties for listing in the National Register. Based on this analysis, the NIH has determined that the Selected Alternative would not adversely affect any historic properties or MIHP- listed properties. Pursuant to Section 106 of the NHPA, the NIH initiated consultation with the MD SHPO to obtain their concurrence with this finding. MD SHPO's concurrence of no adverse effect was received on 20 April 2015. Practicable Means To Avoid or Minimize Potential Environmental Harm From the Selected Alternative All practicable means to avoid or minimize adverse environmental effects from the Selected Alternative have been identified and incorporated into the action. The proposed Chilled Water System Improvement construction will be subject to the existing NIH pollution prevention, waste management, and safety, security, and emergency response procedures as well as existing environmental permits. Best management practices, spill prevention and control, and stormwater management plans will be followed to appropriately address the construction and operation of the new Chilled Water [[Page 56474]] System and comply with applicable regulatory and NIH requirements. No additional mitigation measures have been identified. Pollution Prevention Air quality permit standards will be met, as will all federal, state, and local requirements to protect the environment and public health. Conclusion Based upon review and careful consideration, the NIH has decided to implement the Selected Alternative for a Chilled Water System Improvement System located in Bethesda, Maryland. The decision accounts for a potential outside disturbance interrupting the campus water supply. The system will provide sufficient storage capacity to meet two days of chilled water demand and two days of industrial water demand should an interruption occur. The decision was based upon review and careful consideration of the impacts identified in the Final EIS and public comments received throughout the NEPA process. Dated: September 8, 2015. Daniel G. Wheeland, Director, Office of Research Facilities Development and Operations, National Institutes of Health. [FR Doc. 2015-23487 Filed 9-17-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 181 / Friday, September 18, 2015 / Notices 56471
agreement) to conduct research This form was modified in 2009 to be States that review clinical investigations
involving human subjects submit to consistent with IRB registration regulated by FDA under sections 505(i)
HHS assurances satisfactory to the requirements, 45 CFR 46, subpart E and or 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug and
Secretary that it has established an 21 CFR 56.106 that were adopted in July Cosmetic Act; and, IRBs in the United
institutional review board (IRB) to 2009 OHRP and FDA, respectively. States that review clinical investigations
review the research in order to ensure Need and Proposed Use of the that are intended to support
protection of the rights and welfare of Information: The information collected applications for research or marketing
the human research subjects. IRBs are through the Institutional Review Board permits for FDA-regulated products.
boards, committees, or groups formally registration collection requirements is
the minimum necessary to satisfy the Burden Statement: The burden
designated by an entity to review, estimates for the IRB registration form
approve, and have continuing oversight registration requirements of Section
491(a) of the Public Health Service Act, include those approved by OMB in
of research involving human subjects. March 2015 under Control Number
45 CFR part 46, subpart E and 21 CFR
The Office for Human Research 56.106. 0990–0263, the Assurance
Protections (OHRP) and the Food and Likely Respondents: Institutions or Identification/IRB Certification/
Drug Administration (FDA) are organizations operating IRBs that review Declaration of Exemption form (former
requesting a three-year extension of the human subjects research conducted or Optional Form 310). Those burden
OMB No. 0990–0279, Institutional supported by HHS, or, in the case of estimates are not included as part of the
Review Board (IRB) Registration Form. FDA’s regulations, IRBs in the United burden estimate presented below.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Average
Number of
Number of burden per Total
Form name responses per
respondents response burden hours
respondent (in hours)
IRB Registration 0990–0279 ........................................................................... 5,900 2 1 11,800
New Registratration ......................................................................................... 500 2 1 1,000
Total .......................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 12,800
Darius Taylor, nihnepa@mail.nih.gov. Responsible approximately nine million gallons of
Information Collection Clearance Officer. Official: Daniel G. Wheeland, Director, chilled water. Components of the
[FR Doc. 2015–23453 Filed 9–17–15; 8:45 am] Office of Research Facilities (ORF) system would include a storage tank, at
BILLING CODE 4150–28–P Development and Operations, NIH. or partially below-grade, with a
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: footprint of approximately 12,000 SF; a
pump house building with a footprint of
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Decision approximately 5,000 SF or less; support
HUMAN SERVICES After careful review of the equipment, such as pumps, valves,
environmental consequences in the piping, controls, and an emergency
National Institutes of Health Final Environmental Impact Statement generator; and security fencing, lighting,
for the Chilled Water System and other site improvements. The NIH
Bethesda Campus Chilled Water Improvements, National Institutes of would use this system to meet chilled
System Improvements Record of Health, and consideration of public water demands within the Campus.
Decision comment throughout the NEPA process,
Industrial Water Storage System
SUMMARY: The Department of Health and the NIH has decided to implement the
Proposed Action described below as the This system would be located at the
Human Services, the National Institutes
Selected Alternative. Parking Lot 41 site and would store up
of Health (NIH), has decided, after
to approximately five million gallons of
completion of a Final Environmental Selected Alternative industrial water. Industrial water is
Impact Statement (FEIS) and a thorough
The Selected Alternative would water that the CUP utilizes to generate
consideration of the public comments
implement chilled water system steam or chilled water. Components of
on the Draft EIS, to implement the
improvements that would enable the the system would include a storage
Proposed Action, referred to as the
NIH to adequately accomplish the tank, partially below-grade; a pump
Proposed Action in the Final EIS. This
project goals. This would include house building with a footprint of
action is to install a Thermal Energy
sufficient storage capacity to meet two approximately 5,000 SF; support
Storage System and an Industrial Water
days of chilled water demand and two equipment, such as pumps, valves,
Storage System to provide sufficient
days of industrial water demand should variable frequency drivers, electrical
storage capacity to meet two days of
an outside disturbance interrupt the equipment, switchgear, piping, controls,
chilled water demand and two days of
normal supply of water by the WSSC. instrumentation, and an emergency
industrial water demand should an
Elements of the Chilled Water System generator; and security fencing, lighting,
outside disturbance interrupt the water
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Improvements project that the NIH and other site improvements. The NIH
supply.
would implement under the Proposed would use this system to ensure an
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Action include the following: adequate supply of water to the chillers.
Valerie Nottingham, Deputy Director,
DEP, ORF, NIH, Building 13, Room Thermal Energy Storage System Other Supporting Infrastructure
2S11, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, This system would be located at the The Thermal Energy Storage System
MD 20892, Phone 301–496–7775, Building 34 site and would store up to and the Industrial Water Storage System
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Sep 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM 18SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_56652/page/1.svg)
![56474 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 181 / Friday, September 18, 2015 / Notices
System and comply with applicable Agenda: To review and evaluate grant NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center,
regulatory and NIH requirements. No applications. 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3204, MSC
additional mitigation measures have Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892–9529, 301–496–
Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin 0660, benzingw@mail.nih.gov.
been identified.
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Pollution Prevention Contact Person: Raul A. Saavedra, Ph.D., Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854,
Air quality permit standards will be Branch, Division of Extramural Research, Biological Basis Research in the
met, as will all federal, state, and local NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health,
requirements to protect the environment 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC HHS)
and public health. 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892–9529, 301–496–
9223, saavedrr@ninds.nih.gov. Dated: September 14, 2014.
Conclusion Name of Committee: Neurological Sciences Carolyn Baum,
Based upon review and careful Training Initial Review Group, NST–2 Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
consideration, the NIH has decided to Subcommittee. Committee Policy.
implement the Selected Alternative for Date: October 26–27, 2015. [FR Doc. 2015–23444 Filed 9–17–15; 8:45 am]
a Chilled Water System Improvement Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
System located in Bethesda, Maryland. applications.
The decision accounts for a potential Place: Hotel Monaco Alexandria, 480 King
outside disturbance interrupting the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.
campus water supply. The system will Contact Person: Elizabeth A. Webber Ph.D.,
HUMAN SERVICES
provide sufficient storage capacity to Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review
Branch, Division of Extramural Research,
National Institutes of Health
meet two days of chilled water demand
and two days of industrial water NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center,
6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC
National Institute of Mental Health;
demand should an interruption occur. Notice of Closed Meetings
The decision was based upon review 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892–9529, 301–496–
1917, webbere@mail.nih.gov. Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
and careful consideration of the impacts
identified in the Final EIS and public Name of Committee: National Institute of Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
Neurological Disorders and Stroke Initial amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
comments received throughout the Review Group; Neurological Sciences and
NEPA process. hereby given of the following meetings.
Disorders A.
The meetings will be closed to the
Dated: September 8, 2015. Date: October 27–28, 2015.
Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. public in accordance with the
Daniel G. Wheeland, provisions set forth in sections
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
Director, Office of Research Facilities 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
applications.
Development and Operations, National as amended. The grant applications and
Place: Admiral Fell Inn, 888 South
Institutes of Health.
Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21231. the discussions could disclose
[FR Doc. 2015–23487 Filed 9–17–15; 8:45 am] Contact Person: Natalia Strunnikova, confidential trade secrets or commercial
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific property such as patentable material,
Review Branch, Division of Extramural and personal information concerning
Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience
individuals associated with the grant
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite
3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892–9529, applications, the disclosure of which
HUMAN SERVICES would constitute a clearly unwarranted
301–402–0288, natalia.strunnikova@nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health Name of Committee: National Institute of invasion of personal privacy.
Neurological Disorders and Stroke Initial Name of Committee: National Institute of
National Institute of Neurological Review Group; Neurological Sciences and Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel;
Disorders and Stroke; Notice of Closed Disorders B. Research Education Programs (R25).
Meetings Date: October 29, 2015. Date: October 9, 2015.
Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Agenda: To review and evaluate grant Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as applications. applications.
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is Place: Hotel Monaco Alexandria, 480 King Place: National Institutes of Health,
hereby given of the following meetings. Street, Alexandria, VA 22314. Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive
Contact Person: Birgit Neuhuber, Ph.D., Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone
The meetings will be closed to the
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Conference Call).
public in accordance with the Branch, Division of Extramural Research, Contact Person: Aileen Schulte, Ph.D.,
provisions set forth in sections NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, Scientific Review Officer, Division of
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC Extramural Activities, National Institute of
as amended. The grant applications and 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892–9529, 301–496– Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center,
the discussions could disclose 3562, neuhuber@ninds.nih.gov. 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6140, MSC 9608,
confidential trade secrets or commercial Name of Committee: National Institute of Bethesda, MD 20892–9608, 301–443–1225,
property such as patentable material, Neurological Disorders and Stroke Initial aschulte@mail.nih.gov.
and personal information concerning Review Group; Neurological Sciences and Name of Committee: National Institute of
individuals associated with the grant Disorders C. Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel;
applications, the disclosure of which Date: November 5–6, 2015. Confirmatory Efficacy Clinical Trials of Non-
Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Pharmacological Interventions for Mental
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant Disorders.
invasion of personal privacy. applications. Date: October 14, 2015.
Name of Committee: Neurological Sciences Place: Embassy Suites Alexandria, 1900 Time: 11:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Training Initial Review Group, NST–1 Diagonal Road, Alexandria, VA 22314. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
Subcommittee. Contact Person: William C. Benzing, Ph.D., applications.
Date: October 13–14, 2015. Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Place: National Institutes of Health,
Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Branch, Division of Extramural Research, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Sep 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM 18SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_56652/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 09:27:55
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 09:27:55
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Valerie Nottingham, Deputy Director, DEP, ORF, NIH, Building 13, Room 2S11, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, Phone 301-496-7775, [email protected] Responsible Official: Daniel G. Wheeland, Director, Office of Research Facilities (ORF) Development and Operations, NIH. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 56471 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR