80 FR 56503 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a Principles-Based Approach To Prohibit the Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information by Market Makers
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 181 (September 18, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 181 (September 18, 2015)
| Page Range | 56503-56506 | |
| FR Document | 2015-23400 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 181 (Friday, September 18, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 56503-56506] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-23400] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-75916; File No. SR-BOX-2015-31] Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a Principles-Based Approach To Prohibit the Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information by Market Makers September 14, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on September 3, 2015, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to adopt a principles-based approach to prohibit the misuse of material nonpublic information by Market Makers by deleting BOX Rule 8090 (Limitation on Dealings). The text of the proposed rule change is available from the principal office of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the Exchange's Internet Web site at http://boxexchange.com. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to adopt a principles-based approach to prohibit the misuse of material non-public information by Market Makers by deleting BOX Rule 8090 (Limitation on Dealing). In doing so, the Exchange would harmonize its rules governing BOX Participants and BOX Market Makers relating to protecting against the misuse of material, non-public information. The Exchange believes that BOX Rule 8090 is no longer necessary because all Market Makers are subject to the Exchange's general principles-based requirements governing the protection against the misuse of material, non-public information, pursuant to BOX Rule 3090 (Prevention of the Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information), which obviates the need for separately- prescribed requirements for a subset of market participants on the Exchange. Additionally, there is no separate regulatory purpose served by having separate rules for Market Makers. The Exchange notes that this proposed rule change will not decrease the protections against the misuse of material, non-public information; instead, it is designed to provide more flexibility to Option Participants. This is a competitive filing that is based on a proposal recently submitted by NYSE MKT LLC (``NYSE MKT'') and approved by the Commission.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75432 (July 13, 2015), 80 FR 42597 (July 17, 2015) (Order Approving SR-NYSEMKT-2015- 23). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Background The Exchange has two classes of registered Options Participants. Pursuant to BOX Rule 100(a)(4), the term ``Options Participant'' or ``Participant'' means a firm, or organization that is registered with the Exchange pursuant to the Rule 2000 Series (Participation) for purposes of participating in options trading on BOX as an ``Order Flow Provider'' or ``Market Maker''. Pursuant to Rule 100(a)(30) Market Maker means an Options Participant registered with the Exchange for the purpose of making markets in options contracts traded on the Exchange and that is vested with the rights and responsibilities specified in the Rule 8000 Series. All Market Makers are designated as specialists on the Exchange for all purposes under the Exchange Act or Rules thereunder. [[Page 56504]] BOX Rule 8040 (Market Maker Obligations) specifies the obligations of Market Makers. The heightened quoting obligations of Market Makers are set forth in BOX Rule 8050 (Market Maker Quotations).\4\ BOX Rule 8090 requires Market Makers to maintain information barriers that are reasonably designed to prevent the misuse of material, non-public corporate or markets information in the possession of persons on one side of the barrier to persons on the other side of the barrier. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ BOX Rule 8050(e), Continuous Quotes, On a daily basis, a Market Maker must during regular market hours make markets and enter into any resulting transactions consistent with the applicable quoting requirements specified in these rules, such that on a daily basis a Market Maker must post valid quotes at least sixty percent (60%) of the time that the classes are open for trading. These obligations will apply to all of the Market Maker's appointed classes collectively, rather than on a class-by-class basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule Change The Exchange believes that the particularized guidelines in BOX Rule 8090 for Market Makers are no longer necessary and proposes to delete it. Rather, the Exchange believes that BOX Rule 3090 (Prevention of the Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information) governing the misuse of material, non-public information provides for an appropriate, principles-based approach to prevent the market abuses BOX Rule 8090 is designed to address. Specifically, BOX Rule 3090 requires every Options Participant to establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the misuse of material, non- public information by such Participant or persons associated with such Participant. For purposes of this requirement, the misuse of material, non-public information includes, but is not limited to, the following: (1) Trading in any securities issued by a corporation, partnership, or a trust or similar entities, or in any related securities or related options or other derivative securities, or in any related non-U.S. currency, non-U.S. currency options, futures or options on futures on such currency, or any other derivatives based on such currency, or in any related commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures or any other related commodity derivatives, while in possession of material nonpublic information concerning that issuer; (2) trading in an underlying security or related options or other derivative securities, or in any related non-U.S. currency, non-U.S. currency options, futures or options on futures on such currency, or in any related commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures or any other related commodity derivatives, or any other derivatives based on such currency, while in possession of material nonpublic information concerning imminent transactions in the above; and (3) disclosing to another person any material nonpublic information involving a corporation, partnership, or Funds or a trust or similar entities whose shares are publicly traded or disclosing an imminent transaction in an underlying security or related securities or in the underlying non-U.S. currency or any related non-U.S. currency options, futures or options on futures on such currency, or in any related commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures or any other related commodity derivatives, or any other derivatives based on such currency for the purpose of facilitating the possible misuse of such material nonpublic information. Because Options Participants are already subject to the requirements of BOX Rule 3090, the Exchange does not believe that it is necessary to separately require specific limitations on Market Makers. Deleting BOX Rule 8090 and requirements for specific procedures would provide Market Makers with the flexibility to adapt their policies and procedures as appropriate to reflect changes to their business model, business activities, or the securities market in a manner similar to how Options Participants on the Exchange currently operate and consistent with BOX Rule 3090. As noted above, Market Makers are distinguished under Exchange rules from other Options Participants only to the extent that Market Makers have heightened quiting [sic] obligations. However, none of these heightened obligations provides different or greater access to nonpublic information than any other Options Participant on the Exchange.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See BOX Rules 8040 and 8050. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Accordingly, because Market Makers do not have any trading advantages at the Exchange due to their market role, the Exchange believes that they should be subject to the same rules regarding the protection against the misuse of material non-public information, which in this case, is existing BOX Rule 3090.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ The Exchange notes that by deleting BOX Rule 8090, the Exchange would no longer require specific information barriers for Market Makers or require pre-approval of any information barriers that a Market Maker would erect for purposes of protecting against the misuse of material non-public information. However, as is the case today with Options Participants, information barriers of new entrants, would be subject to review as part of a new firm application. Moreover, the policies and procedures of Market Makers, including those relating to information barriers, would be subject to review by FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, pursuant to a Regulatory Services Agreement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange notes that its proposed approach to use a principles- based approach to protecting against the misuse of material non-public information for all of its registered Options Participants is consistent with recently filed rule changes for NYSE MKT and approved rule changes for, NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE Arca''), BATS Exchange, Inc.'s (``BATS''), and New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') rules governing cash equity market makers on those respective exchanges.\7\ Except for prescribed rules relating to floor-based designated market makers on the NYSE, who have access to specified non- public trading information, each of these exchanges have moved to a principles-based approach to protecting against the misuse of material non- public information. In connection with approving those rule changes, the Commission found that, with adequate oversight by the exchanges of their members, eliminating prescriptive information barrier requirements should not reduce the effectiveness of exchange rules requiring its members to establish and maintain systems to supervise the activities of its members, including written procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with applicable federal securities law and regulations, and with the rules of the applicable exchange.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75432 (July 13, 2015), 80 FR 42597 (July 17, 2015) (Order Approving Adopting a Principles-Based Approach to Prohibit the Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information by Specialists and e-Specialists by Deleting Rule 927.3NY and Section (f) of Rule 927.5NY). See also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 60604 (Sept. 2, 2009), 76 FR 46272 (Sept. 8, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-78) (Order approving elimination of NYSE Arca rule that required market makers to establish and maintain specifically prescribed information barriers, including discussion of NYSE Arca and Nasdaq rules) (``Arca Approval Order''); 61574 (Feb. 23, 2010), 75 FR 9455 (Mar. 2, 2010) (SR-BATS-2010-003) (Order approving amendments to BATS Rule 5.5 to move to a principles-based approach to protecting against the misuse of material, non-public information, and noting that the proposed change is consistent with the approaches of NYSE Arca and Nasdaq) (``BATS Approval Order''); and 72534 (July 3, 2014), 79 FR 39440 (July 10, 2014), SR-NYSE-2014- 12) (Order approving amendments to NYSE Rule 98 governing designated market makers to move to a principles-based approach to prohibit the misuse of material non-public information) (``NYSE Approval Order''). \8\ See, e.g., BATS Approval Order, supra note 7 at 9458. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comparable to members of cash equity markets, the Exchange believes that a principles-based rule applicable to members of options markets would be equally effective in protecting against [[Page 56505]] the misuse of material non-public information. Indeed, BOX Rule 3090 is currently applicable to Options Participants which already requires policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect against the misuse of material nonpublic information, which is similar to the respective NYSE MKT, NYSE Arca Equities, BATS and NYSE rules governing cash equity market makers. The Exchange believes BOX Rule 3090 provides appropriate protection against the misuse of material nonpublic information by Options Participants and there is no longer a need for prescriptive information barrier requirements in BOX Rule 8090. The Exchange notes that even with this proposed rule change, pursuant to BOX Rule 3090, an Options Participant would still be obligated to ensure that its policies and procedures reflect the current state of its business and continue to be reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable federal securities law and regulations, including Section 15(g) of the Act,\9\ and with applicable Exchange rules, including being reasonably designed to protect against the misuse of material, non-public information. While information barriers would not specifically be required under the proposal, BOX Rule 3090 already requires that an Options Participant consider its business model or business activities in structuring its policies and procedures, which may dictate that an information barrier or a functional separation be part of the appropriate set of policies and procedures that would be reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities law and regulations, and with applicable Exchange rules. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(g). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that the proposed reliance on the principles- based BOX Rule 3090 would ensure that an Options Participant would be required to protect against the misuse of any material non-public information. As noted above, BOX Rule 3090 already requires that firms refrain from trading while in possession of material non-public information concerning imminent transactions in the security or related product. The Exchange believes that moving to a principles-based approach rather than prescribing how and when to wall off a Market Maker from the rest of the firm would provide Market Makers with flexibility when managing risk across a firm, including integrating options positions with other positions of the firm or, as applicable, by the respective independent trading unit. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\10\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market by adopting a principles- based approach to permit an Options Participant to maintain and enforce policies and procedures to, among other things, prohibit the misuse of material non-public information and provide flexibility on how a Market Maker structures its operations. The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change is based on an approved rule of the Exchange to which Options Participants--BOX Rule 3090--and harmonizes the rules governing Options Participants. Moreover, Market Makers would continue to be subject to federal and Exchange requirements for protecting material non- public order information.\12\ The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market because it would harmonize the Exchange's approach to protecting against the misuse of material nonpublic information and no longer subject Market Makers to prescriptive requirements. The Exchange does not believe that the existing prescriptive requirements applicable to Options Participants are narrowly tailored to their respective roles because neither market participant has access to Exchange trading information in a manner different from any other market participant on the Exchange. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 15 U.S.C. 78o(g) and BOX Rule 3090. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange further believes the proposal is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and to promote just and equitable principles of trade because existing rules make clear to Options Participants the type of conduct that is prohibited by the Exchange. While the proposal eliminates prescriptive requirements relating to the misuse of material non-public information, Market Makers would remain subject to existing Exchange rules requiring them to establish and maintain systems to supervise their activities, and to create, implement, and maintain written procedures that are reasonably designed to comply with applicable securities laws and Exchange rules, including the prohibition on the misuse of material, nonpublic information. Additionally, the policies and procedures of Market Makers, including those relating to information barriers, would be subject to review by FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See supra, note 6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change would still require that Market Makers maintain and enforce policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with applicable federal securities laws and regulations and with Exchange rules. Even though there would no longer be pre-approval of Market Maker information barriers, any Market Maker written policies and procedures would continue to be subject to oversight by the Exchange and therefore the elimination of prescribed restrictions should not reduce the effectiveness of the Exchange rules to protect against the misuse of material non-public information. Rather, Options Participants will be able to utilize a flexible, principles-based approach to modify their policies and procedures as appropriate to reflect changes to their business model, business activities, or to the securities market itself. Moreover, while specified information barriers may no longer be required, an Options Participant's business model or business activities may dictate that an information barrier or functional separation be part of the appropriate set of policies and procedures that would be reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations, and with applicable Exchange rules. The Exchange therefore believes that the proposed rule change will maintain the existing protection of investors and the public interest that is currently applicable to Market Makers, while at the same time removing impediments to and perfecting a free and open market by moving to a principles-based approach to protect against the misuse of material non-public information. [[Page 56506]] B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In this regard and as indicated above, the Exchange notes that the rule change is being proposed as a competitive response to a filing submitted by NYSE MKT that was recently approved by the Commission.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See supra, note 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To the contrary, the Exchange believes that the proposal will enhance competition by allowing Market Makers to comply with applicable Exchange rules in a manner best suited to their business models, business activities, and the securities markets, thus reducing regulatory burdens while still ensuring compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations and Exchange rules. The Exchange believes that the proposal will foster a fair and orderly marketplace without being overly burdensome upon Market Makers. Moreover, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would eliminate a burden on competition for Options Participants which currently exists as a result of disparate rule treatment between the options and equities markets regarding how to protect against the misuse of material non-public information. For those Options Participants that are also members of equity exchanges, their respective equity market maker operations are now subject to a principles-based approach to protecting against the misuse of material non-public information. The Exchange believes it would remove a burden on competition to enable Options Participants to similarly apply a principles-based approach to protecting against the misuse of material nonpublic information in the options space. To this end, the Exchange notes that BOX Rule 3090 still requires Market Makers to evaluate its business to assure that its policies and procedures are reasonably designed to protect against the misuse of material nonpublic information. However, with this proposed rule change, an Options Participant that trades equities and options could look at its firm more holistically to structure its operations in a manner that provides it with better tools to manage its risks across multiple security classes, while at the same time protecting against the misuse of material non-public information. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The Exchange believes that the foregoing proposed rule change may take effect upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder because the foregoing proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest, (ii) impose any significant burden on competition, and (iii) become operative for 30 days after its filing date, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-BOX-2015-31 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2015-31. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2015-31 and should be submitted on or before October 9, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-23400 Filed 9-17-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 181 / Friday, September 18, 2015 / Notices 56503
I. Introduction SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
COMMISSION Statement of the Purpose of, and
On September 11, 2015, the Postal Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Service filed notice that it has entered Change
[Release No. 34–75916; File No. SR–BOX–
into an additional Global Expedited
2015–31] 1. Purpose
Package Services 3 (GEPS 3) negotiated
service agreement (Agreement).1 Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX The Exchange proposes to adopt a
To support its Notice, the Postal Options Exchange LLC; Notice of principles-based approach to prohibit
Service filed a copy of the Agreement, Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of the misuse of material non-public
a copy of the Governors’ Decision Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a information by Market Makers by
authorizing the product, a certification Principles-Based Approach To Prohibit deleting BOX Rule 8090 (Limitation on
of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), the Misuse of Material Nonpublic Dealing). In doing so, the Exchange
and an application for non-public Information by Market Makers would harmonize its rules governing
treatment of certain materials. It also BOX Participants and BOX Market
filed supporting financial workpapers. September 14, 2015. Makers relating to protecting against the
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the misuse of material, non-public
II. Notice of Commission Action information. The Exchange believes that
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 BOX Rule 8090 is no longer necessary
The Commission establishes Docket
notice is hereby given that on because all Market Makers are subject to
No. CP2015–137 for consideration of the Exchange’s general principles-based
matters raised by the Notice. September 3, 2015, BOX Options
requirements governing the protection
The Commission invites comments on Exchange LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
against the misuse of material, non-
whether the Postal Service’s filing is with the Securities and Exchange public information, pursuant to BOX
consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the Rule 3090 (Prevention of the Misuse of
3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and 39 CFR proposed rule change as described in Material Nonpublic Information), which
part 3020, subpart B. Comments are due Items I and II below, which Items have obviates the need for separately-
no later than September 21, 2015. The been prepared by the self-regulatory prescribed requirements for a subset of
public portions of the filing can be organization. The Commission is market participants on the Exchange.
accessed via the Commission’s Web site publishing this notice to solicit Additionally, there is no separate
(http://www.prc.gov). comments on the proposed rule from regulatory purpose served by having
interested persons. separate rules for Market Makers. The
The Commission appoints Curtis E. Exchange notes that this proposed rule
Kidd to serve as Public Representative I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
change will not decrease the protections
in this docket. Statement of the Terms of Substance of
against the misuse of material, non-
the Proposed Rule Change
III. Ordering Paragraphs public information; instead, it is
The Exchange proposes to adopt a designed to provide more flexibility to
It is ordered: principles-based approach to prohibit Option Participants. This is a
1. The Commission establishes Docket the misuse of material nonpublic competitive filing that is based on a
No. CP2015–137 for consideration of the information by Market Makers by proposal recently submitted by NYSE
matters raised by the Postal Service’s deleting BOX Rule 8090 (Limitation on MKT LLC (‘‘NYSE MKT’’) and approved
Notice. by the Commission.3
Dealings). The text of the proposed rule
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Curtis E. change is available from the principal Background
Kidd is appointed to serve as an officer office of the Exchange, at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room The Exchange has two classes of
of the Commission to represent the
and also on the Exchange’s Internet Web registered Options Participants.
interests of the general public in this Pursuant to BOX Rule 100(a)(4), the
proceeding (Public Representative). site at http://boxexchange.com.
term ‘‘Options Participant’’ or
3. Comments are due no later than II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s ‘‘Participant’’ means a firm, or
September 21, 2015. Statement of the Purpose of, and organization that is registered with the
4. The Secretary shall arrange for Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Exchange pursuant to the Rule 2000
publication of this order in the Federal Change Series (Participation) for purposes of
Register. participating in options trading on BOX
In its filing with the Commission, the as an ‘‘Order Flow Provider’’ or ‘‘Market
By the Commission. self-regulatory organization included Maker’’. Pursuant to Rule 100(a)(30)
Ruth Ann Abrams, statements concerning the purpose of, Market Maker means an Options
Acting Secretary. and basis for, the proposed rule change Participant registered with the Exchange
[FR Doc. 2015–23431 Filed 9–17–15; 8:45 am] and discussed any comments it received for the purpose of making markets in
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
on the proposed rule change. The text options contracts traded on the
of these statements may be examined at Exchange and that is vested with the
the places specified in Item IV below. rights and responsibilities specified in
The self-regulatory organization has the Rule 8000 Series. All Market Makers
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
prepared summaries, set forth in are designated as specialists on the
1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing Sections A, B, and C below, of the most Exchange for all purposes under the
a Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited significant aspects of such statements. Exchange Act or Rules thereunder.
Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreement
and Application for Non-Public Treatment of 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75432
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Materials Filed Under Seal, September 11, 2015 (July 13, 2015), 80 FR 42597 (July 17, 2015) (Order
(Notice). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Approving SR–NYSEMKT–2015–23).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Sep 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM 18SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_56684/page/1.svg)
![56504 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 181 / Friday, September 18, 2015 / Notices
BOX Rule 8040 (Market Maker related commodity futures or options on The Exchange notes that its proposed
Obligations) specifies the obligations of commodity futures or any other related approach to use a principles-based
Market Makers. The heightened quoting commodity derivatives, or any other approach to protecting against the
obligations of Market Makers are set derivatives based on such currency, misuse of material non-public
forth in BOX Rule 8050 (Market Maker while in possession of material information for all of its registered
Quotations).4 BOX Rule 8090 requires nonpublic information concerning Options Participants is consistent with
Market Makers to maintain information imminent transactions in the above; and recently filed rule changes for NYSE
barriers that are reasonably designed to (3) disclosing to another person any MKT and approved rule changes for,
prevent the misuse of material, non- material nonpublic information NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
public corporate or markets information involving a corporation, partnership, or Arca’’), BATS Exchange, Inc.’s
in the possession of persons on one side Funds or a trust or similar entities (‘‘BATS’’), and New York Stock
of the barrier to persons on the other whose shares are publicly traded or Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) rules
side of the barrier. disclosing an imminent transaction in governing cash equity market makers on
an underlying security or related those respective exchanges.7 Except for
Proposed Rule Change
securities or in the underlying non-U.S. prescribed rules relating to floor-based
The Exchange believes that the currency or any related non-U.S. designated market makers on the NYSE,
particularized guidelines in BOX Rule currency options, futures or options on who have access to specified non-public
8090 for Market Makers are no longer futures on such currency, or in any trading information, each of these
necessary and proposes to delete it. related commodity, related commodity exchanges have moved to a principles-
Rather, the Exchange believes that BOX futures or options on commodity futures based approach to protecting against the
Rule 3090 (Prevention of the Misuse of or any other related commodity misuse of material non- public
Material Nonpublic Information) derivatives, or any other derivatives information. In connection with
governing the misuse of material, non- based on such currency for the purpose approving those rule changes, the
public information provides for an of facilitating the possible misuse of Commission found that, with adequate
appropriate, principles-based approach such material nonpublic information. oversight by the exchanges of their
to prevent the market abuses BOX Rule Because Options Participants are members, eliminating prescriptive
8090 is designed to address. already subject to the requirements of information barrier requirements should
Specifically, BOX Rule 3090 requires BOX Rule 3090, the Exchange does not not reduce the effectiveness of exchange
every Options Participant to establish, believe that it is necessary to separately rules requiring its members to establish
maintain, and enforce written policies and maintain systems to supervise the
require specific limitations on Market
and procedures reasonably designed to activities of its members, including
Makers. Deleting BOX Rule 8090 and
prevent the misuse of material, non- written procedures reasonably designed
requirements for specific procedures
public information by such Participant to ensure compliance with applicable
would provide Market Makers with the
or persons associated with such federal securities law and regulations,
flexibility to adapt their policies and
Participant. For purposes of this and with the rules of the applicable
procedures as appropriate to reflect
requirement, the misuse of material, exchange.8
changes to their business model,
non-public information includes, but is Comparable to members of cash
business activities, or the securities
not limited to, the following: equity markets, the Exchange believes
(1) Trading in any securities issued by market in a manner similar to how
Options Participants on the Exchange that a principles-based rule applicable
a corporation, partnership, or a trust or to members of options markets would be
similar entities, or in any related currently operate and consistent with
equally effective in protecting against
securities or related options or other BOX Rule 3090.
derivative securities, or in any related As noted above, Market Makers are
new firm application. Moreover, the policies and
non-U.S. currency, non-U.S. currency distinguished under Exchange rules procedures of Market Makers, including those
options, futures or options on futures on from other Options Participants only to relating to information barriers, would be subject to
the extent that Market Makers have review by FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange,
such currency, or any other derivatives pursuant to a Regulatory Services Agreement.
based on such currency, or in any heightened quiting [sic] obligations. 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75432
related commodity, related commodity However, none of these heightened (July 13, 2015), 80 FR 42597 (July 17, 2015) (Order
futures or options on commodity futures obligations provides different or greater Approving Adopting a Principles-Based Approach
or any other related commodity access to nonpublic information than to Prohibit the Misuse of Material Nonpublic
any other Options Participant on the Information by Specialists and e-Specialists by
derivatives, while in possession of Deleting Rule 927.3NY and Section (f) of Rule
material nonpublic information Exchange.5 927.5NY). See also Securities Exchange Act Release
concerning that issuer; Accordingly, because Market Makers Nos. 60604 (Sept. 2, 2009), 76 FR 46272 (Sept. 8,
(2) trading in an underlying security do not have any trading advantages at 2009) (SR–NYSEArca–2009–78) (Order approving
the Exchange due to their market role, elimination of NYSE Arca rule that required market
or related options or other derivative makers to establish and maintain specifically
securities, or in any related non-U.S. the Exchange believes that they should prescribed information barriers, including
currency, non-U.S. currency options, be subject to the same rules regarding discussion of NYSE Arca and Nasdaq rules) (‘‘Arca
futures or options on futures on such the protection against the misuse of Approval Order’’); 61574 (Feb. 23, 2010), 75 FR
material non-public information, which 9455 (Mar. 2, 2010) (SR–BATS–2010–003) (Order
currency, or in any related commodity, approving amendments to BATS Rule 5.5 to move
in this case, is existing BOX Rule 3090.6 to a principles-based approach to protecting against
4 BOX Rule 8050(e), Continuous Quotes, On a the misuse of material, non-public information, and
5 See BOX Rules 8040 and 8050. noting that the proposed change is consistent with
daily basis, a Market Maker must during regular
market hours make markets and enter into any 6 The Exchange notes that by deleting BOX Rule the approaches of NYSE Arca and Nasdaq) (‘‘BATS
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
resulting transactions consistent with the applicable 8090, the Exchange would no longer require Approval Order’’); and 72534 (July 3, 2014), 79 FR
quoting requirements specified in these rules, such specific information barriers for Market Makers or 39440 (July 10, 2014), SR–NYSE–2014–12) (Order
that on a daily basis a Market Maker must post valid require pre-approval of any information barriers approving amendments to NYSE Rule 98 governing
quotes at least sixty percent (60%) of the time that that a Market Maker would erect for purposes of designated market makers to move to a principles-
the classes are open for trading. These obligations protecting against the misuse of material non-public based approach to prohibit the misuse of material
will apply to all of the Market Maker’s appointed information. However, as is the case today with non-public information) (‘‘NYSE Approval Order’’).
classes collectively, rather than on a class-by-class Options Participants, information barriers of new 8 See, e.g., BATS Approval Order, supra note 7 at
basis. entrants, would be subject to review as part of a 9458.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Sep 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM 18SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_56684/page/2.svg)
![56506 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 181 / Friday, September 18, 2015 / Notices
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s post all comments on the Commission’s
Statement on Burden on Competition Statement on Comments on the Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
Proposed Rule Change Received From rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
The Exchange does not believe that Members, Participants, or Others submission, all subsequent
the proposed rule change will impose amendments, all written statements
any burden on competition not The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received comments on the proposed with respect to the proposed rule
necessary or appropriate in furtherance change that are filed with the
of the purposes of the Act. In this regard rule change.
Commission, and all written
and as indicated above, the Exchange III. Date of Effectiveness of the communications relating to the
notes that the rule change is being Proposed Rule Change and Timing for proposed rule change between the
proposed as a competitive response to a Commission Action Commission and any person, other than
filing submitted by NYSE MKT that was those that may be withheld from the
recently approved by the Commission.14 The Exchange believes that the
foregoing proposed rule change may public in accordance with the
To the contrary, the Exchange take effect upon filing with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
believes that the proposal will enhance Commission pursuant to Section available for Web site viewing and
competition by allowing Market Makers 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b– printing in the Commission’s Public
to comply with applicable Exchange 4(f)(6) thereunder because the foregoing Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
rules in a manner best suited to their proposed rule change does not (i) Washington, DC 20549, on official
business models, business activities, significantly affect the protection of business days between the hours of
and the securities markets, thus investors or the public interest, (ii) 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
reducing regulatory burdens while still impose any significant burden on filing will also be available for
ensuring compliance with applicable competition, and (iii) become operative inspection and copying at the principal
securities laws and regulations and for 30 days after its filing date, or such office of the Exchange. All comments
Exchange rules. The Exchange believes shorter time as the Commission may received will be posted without change;
that the proposal will foster a fair and designate. the Commission does not edit personal
orderly marketplace without being At any time within 60 days of the identifying information from
overly burdensome upon Market filing of the proposed rule change, the submissions. You should submit only
Makers. Commission summarily may information that you wish to make
Moreover, the Exchange believes that temporarily suspend such rule change if available publicly. All submissions
the proposed rule change would it appears to the Commission that such should refer to File Number SR–BOX–
eliminate a burden on competition for action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in 2015–31 and should be submitted on or
Options Participants which currently the public interest; (ii) for the protection before October 9, 2015.
exists as a result of disparate rule of investors; or (iii) otherwise in For the Commission, by the Division of
treatment between the options and furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
equities markets regarding how to If the Commission takes such action, the authority.15
protect against the misuse of material Commission shall institute proceedings Brent J. Fields,
non-public information. For those to determine whether the proposed rule Secretary.
Options Participants that are also should be approved or disapproved. [FR Doc. 2015–23400 Filed 9–17–15; 8:45 am]
members of equity exchanges, their BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
respective equity market maker IV. Solicitation of Comments
operations are now subject to a Interested persons are invited to
principles-based approach to protecting submit written data, views, and SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
against the misuse of material non- arguments concerning the foregoing, COMMISSION
public information. The Exchange including whether the proposed rule
believes it would remove a burden on change is consistent with the Act. Proposed Collection; Comment
competition to enable Options Comments may be submitted by any of Request
Participants to similarly apply a the following methods:
principles-based approach to protecting Upon Written Request Copies Available
against the misuse of material nonpublic Electronic Comments From: Securities and Exchange
information in the options space. To • Use the Commission’s Internet Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
this end, the Exchange notes that BOX comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
Rule 3090 still requires Market Makers rules/sro.shtml); or 20549–2736
to evaluate its business to assure that its • Send an email to rule-comments@ Extension:
policies and procedures are reasonably sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Interactive Data; SEC File No. 270–330,
designed to protect against the misuse of BOX–2015–31 on the subject line. OMB Control No. 3235–0645
material nonpublic information. Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
Paper Comments
However, with this proposed rule to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
change, an Options Participant that • Send paper comments in triplicate (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
trades equities and options could look at to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission
its firm more holistically to structure its and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
operations in a manner that provides it NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. on the collection of information
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
with better tools to manage its risks All submissions should refer to File summarized below. The Commission
across multiple security classes, while Number SR–BOX–2015–31. This file plans to submit this existing collection
at the same time protecting against the number should be included on the of information to the Office of
misuse of material non-public subject line if email is used. To help the Management and Budget for extension
information. Commission process and review your and approval.
comments more efficiently, please use
14 See supra, note 3. only one method. The Commission will 15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Sep 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM 18SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_56684/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 09:28:14
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 09:28:14
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 56503 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR