80 FR 57098 - Safety Zone; Dredging, Rouge River, Detroit, MI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 183 (September 22, 2015)

Page Range		57098-57100
FR Document		2015-24041

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for certain waters of the Rouge River in the vicinity of Detroit, MI. This zone is intended to restrict and control movement of vessels in a portion of the Rouge River. This zone is necessary to protect vessels from potential hazards associated with dredging operations.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 183 (Tuesday, September 22, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 183 (Tuesday, September 22, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57098-57100]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24041]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0835]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Dredging, Rouge River, Detroit, MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
certain waters of the Rouge River in the vicinity of Detroit, MI. This 
zone is intended to restrict and control movement of vessels in a 
portion of the Rouge River. This zone is necessary to protect vessels 
from potential hazards associated with dredging operations.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from September 22, 
2015 until 11:59 p.m. on September 24, 2015. For the purposes of 
enforcement, actual notice will be used from 10 a.m. on August 25, 
2015, until September 22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-0835 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule. You may also visit 
the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of 
the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue 
SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary final rule, call or email Chief Petty Officer Jason Hampton, 
Prevention Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone 313-568-
9616, email [email protected]. If you have questions on viewing 
the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 
telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

[[Page 57099]]

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On August 23, a 300-yard section of retaining wall along the 
Carmeuse facility in River Rouge, MI collapsed, allowing an unknown 
amount of surface materials, including rock and soil to spill into the 
Rouge River. This material has created a hazard to navigation, by 
causing uncertain shifts in the channel depth, and creating a possible 
choke point in the river. The Army Corps of Engineer has conducted 
initial surveys and determined that dredging will be required to 
mitigate these hazards to vessel traffic.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231, 33 CFR 1.05-1 and 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1. The Captain of the Port Detroit (COTP) has 
determined that the spilled surface materials and dredging operations 
on the Rouge River pose a significant risk to public safety and 
property. Such hazards include potential collisions and groundings.

IV. Discussion of Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 10 a.m. on August 25, 2015 
until 11:59 p.m. on September 24, 2015. The safety zone will encompass 
all waters of the Rouge River, Detroit, MI from the West Jefferson 
Avenue Bridge at 42[deg]16.85' N., 083[deg]07.72' W., proceeding East 
approximately 400-yards to a point mid-river at 42[deg]16.80' N., 
083[deg]07.47' W.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated 
representative. Vessel operators must contact the COTP or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to transit through this safety 
zone.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under 
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget 
has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the 
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel 
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be 
relatively small and enforced for a relatively short time. Under 
certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the 
safety zone when permitted by the COTP or his on-scene representative.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    As per the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, as amended, we have considered the potential impact of regulations 
on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might 
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to 
transit or anchor in this portion of the Rouge River near Detroit, MI 
from 10 a.m. August 25, 2015 until 11:59 p.m. September 24, 2015.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the reasons cited in the 
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the 
enforcement of the zone, the COTP would issue local Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners so vessel owners and operators can plan accordingly.

C. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects on them. If the rule would affect your small business, 
organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions 
concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the 
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against entities 
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of 
the Coast Guard.

D. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

E. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and determined 
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

F. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in 
this preamble.

H. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

I. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to

[[Page 57100]]

minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

J. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

K. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

L. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

M. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

N. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually 
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. 
This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and is therefore 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis 
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion 
Determination will be prepared and submitted after publication, and 
will be available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We 
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a 
significant environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0835 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0835  Safety Zone; Dredging, Rouge River, Detroit, MI.

    (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All 
U.S. waters of the Rouge River, Detroit, MI from the West Jefferson 
Avenue Bridge at 42[deg]16.85' N., 083[deg]07.72' W., proceeding East 
approximately 400-yards to a point mid-river at 42[deg]16.80' N., 
083[deg]07.47' W.
    (b) Enforcement period. This rule is effective without actual 
notice from September 22, 2015 until 11:59 p.m. on September 24, 2015. 
For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 10 
a.m. on August 25, 2015, until September 22, 2015.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety 
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit 
(COTP), via Sector Detroit Command Center or his on-scene 
representative.
    (2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the COTP, via the Command Center or his on-scene 
representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any Coast Guard 
commissioned, warrant or petty officer or a Federal, State, or local 
law enforcement officer designated by or assisting the COTP to act on 
his behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators must contact the COTP via the Command Center 
to obtain permission to enter or operate within the safety zone. The 
COTP may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at 313--568-9560. Vessel 
operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must 
comply with all directions given to them by the COTP, via the Sector 
Command Center or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: August 25, 2015.
Raymond Negron,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2015-24041 Filed 9-21-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 57099

II. Background Information and Office of Management and Budget has Ombudsman evaluates these actions
Regulatory History not reviewed it under those Orders. annually and rates each agency’s
We conclude that this rule is not a responsiveness to small business. If you
On August 23, a 300-yard section of
significant regulatory action because we wish to comment on actions by
retaining wall along the Carmeuse anticipate that it will have minimal
facility in River Rouge, MI collapsed, employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
impact on the economy, will not 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
allowing an unknown amount of surface interfere with other agencies, will not
materials, including rock and soil to Coast Guard will not retaliate against
adversely alter the budget of any grant entities that question or complain about
spill into the Rouge River. This material or loan recipients, and will not raise any
has created a hazard to navigation, by this rule or any policy or action of the
novel legal or policy issues. The safety Coast Guard.
causing uncertain shifts in the channel zone created by this rule will be
depth, and creating a possible choke relatively small and enforced for a D. Collection of Information
point in the river. The Army Corps of relatively short time. Under certain
Engineer has conducted initial surveys This rule will not call for a new
conditions, moreover, vessels may still collection of information under the
and determined that dredging will be transit through the safety zone when
required to mitigate these hazards to Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
permitted by the COTP or his on-scene U.S.C. 3501–3520).
vessel traffic. representative.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule E. Federalism
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule A rule has implications for federalism
As per the Regulatory Flexibility Act under Executive Order 13132,
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231, 33 of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as
CFR 1.05–1 and 160.5; and Department Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
amended, we have considered the effect on the States, on the relationship
of Homeland Security Delegation No. potential impact of regulations on small
0170.1. The Captain of the Port Detroit between the national government and
entities during rulemaking. The Coast the States, or on the distribution of
(COTP) has determined that the spilled Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
surface materials and dredging power and responsibilities among the
that this rule will not have a significant various levels of government. We have
operations on the Rouge River pose a economic impact on a substantial
significant risk to public safety and analyzed this rule under that order and
number of small entities. determined that this rule does not have
property. Such hazards include This rule will affect the following
potential collisions and groundings. implications for federalism.
entities, some of which might be small
IV. Discussion of Rule entities: The owners or operators of F. Protest Activities
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
This rule establishes a safety zone this portion of the Rouge River near The Coast Guard respects the First
from 10 a.m. on August 25, 2015 until Detroit, MI from 10 a.m. August 25, Amendment rights of protesters.
11:59 p.m. on September 24, 2015. The 2015 until 11:59 p.m. September 24, Protesters are asked to contact the
safety zone will encompass all waters of 2015. person listed in the FOR FURTHER
the Rouge River, Detroit, MI from the This safety zone will not have a INFORMATION CONTACT section to
West Jefferson Avenue Bridge at significant economic impact on a coordinate protest activities so that your
42°16.85′ N., 083°07.72′ W., proceeding substantial number of small entities for message can be received without
East approximately 400-yards to a point the reasons cited in the Regulatory jeopardizing the safety or security of
mid-river at 42°16.80′ N., 083°07.47′ W. Planning and Review section. people, places, or vessels.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring Additionally, before the enforcement of G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
within the safety zone is prohibited the zone, the COTP would issue local
unless authorized by the COTP or a Broadcast Notice to Mariners so vessel The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
designated representative. Vessel owners and operators can plan of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
operators must contact the COTP or his accordingly. Federal agencies to assess the effects of
on-scene representative to obtain their discretionary regulatory actions. In
permission to transit through this safety C. Assistance for Small Entities particular, the Act addresses actions
zone. Under section 213(a) of the Small that may result in the expenditure by a
Business Regulatory Enforcement State, local, or tribal government, in the
V. Regulatory Analyses Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), aggregate, or by the private sector of
We developed this rule after we want to assist small entities in $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
considering numerous statutes and understanding this rule so that they can more in any one year. Though this rule
executive orders related to rulemaking. better evaluate its effects on them. If the will not result in such expenditure, we
Below we summarize our analyses rule would affect your small business, do discuss the effects of this rule
based on these statutes and executive organization, or governmental elsewhere in this preamble.
orders. jurisdiction and you have questions H. Taking of Private Property
concerning its provisions or options for
A. Regulatory Planning and Review This rule will not cause a taking of
compliance, please contact the person
This rule is not a significant listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION private property or otherwise have
regulatory action under section 3(f) of CONTACT section. taking implications under Executive
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Small businesses may send comments Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Planning and Review, as supplemented on the actions of Federal employees Interference with Constitutionally
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES

by Executive Order 13563, Improving who enforce, or otherwise determine Protected Property Rights.
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and compliance with, Federal regulations to
I. Civil Justice Reform
does not require an assessment of the Small Business and Agriculture
potential costs and benefits under Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman This rule meets applicable standards
section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under and the Regional Small Business in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:50 Sep 21, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM 22SER1

57100 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

minimize litigation, eliminate List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Dated: August 25, 2015.
ambiguity, and reduce burden. Raymond Negron,
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
J. Protection of Children
Captain of the Port Detroit.
requirements, Security measures,
We have analyzed this rule under Waterways. [FR Doc. 2015–24041 Filed 9–21–15; 8:45 am]
Executive Order 13045, Protection of BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
For the reasons discussed in the
Children from Environmental Health
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
CFR part 165 as follows:
an economically significant rule and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
does not create an environmental risk to PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AGENCY
health or risk to safety that may AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
disproportionately affect children. 40 CFR Part 81
K. Indian Tribal Governments ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 [EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0608; FRL–9934–51–
continues to read as follows: Region 9]
This rule does not have tribal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
implications under Executive Order 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Designation for Planning Purposes;
13175, Consultation and Coordination Department of Homeland Security Delegation California; PM10; Technical
with Indian Tribal Governments, No. 0170.1. Amendment
because it does not have a substantial AGENCY: Environmental Protection
■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0835 to read as
direct effect on one or more Indian Agency (EPA).
follows:
tribes, on the relationship between the
ACTION: Final rule; technical
Federal Government and Indian tribes, § 165.T09–0835 Safety Zone; Dredging,
amendment.
or on the distribution of power and Rouge River, Detroit, MI.
responsibilities between the Federal (a) Location. The following area is a SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Government and Indian tribes. temporary safety zone: All U.S. waters Agency (EPA) is making a technical
L. Energy Effects of the Rouge River, Detroit, MI from the amendment to the Code of Federal
West Jefferson Avenue Bridge at Regulations to restore the inadvertent
This action is not a ‘‘significant 42°16.85′ N., 083°07.72′ W., proceeding deletion of the entry for ‘‘Rest of State’’
energy action’’ under Executive Order East approximately 400-yards to a point from the table listing California air
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations mid-river at 42°16.80′ N., 083°07.47′ W. quality planning area designations for
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, (b) Enforcement period. This rule is particulate matter of ten microns of less
Distribution, or Use. effective without actual notice from (PM10).
M. Technical Standards September 22, 2015 until 11:59 p.m. on DATES: This technical amendment is
September 24, 2015. For the purposes of effective on September 22, 2015.
This rule does not use technical enforcement, actual notice will be used FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
standards. Therefore, we did not from 10 a.m. on August 25, 2015, until Wamsley, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
consider the use of voluntary consensus September 22, 2015. 4111, wamsley.jerry@epa.gov.
standards. (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
the general regulations in § 165.23, entry 19, 2013, the EPA published a direct
N. Environment
into, transiting, or anchoring within this final rule amending 40 CFR 81.305 to
We have analyzed this rule under safety zone is prohibited unless clarify the description of the Imperial
Department of Homeland Security authorized by the Captain of the Port Valley planning area, an area designated
Management Directive 023–01 and Detroit (COTP), via Sector Detroit nonattainment for the National Ambient
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, Command Center or his on-scene Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for
which guide the Coast Guard in representative. particulate matter of ten microns of less
complying with the National (2) The safety zone is closed to all (PM10) (78 FR 16792). In our March 19,
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 vessel traffic, except as may be 2013 direct final rule, we amended the
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and permitted by the COTP, via the entry for ‘‘Imperial Valley planning
have concluded this action is one of a Command Center or his on-scene area’’ but did not intend to amend any
category of actions which do not representative. other entry in the table listing PM10 air
individually or cumulatively have a (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of quality planning area designations for
significant effect on the human the COTP is any Coast Guard the State of California. We believe,
environment. This rule involves the commissioned, warrant or petty officer however, that the entry appearing
establishment of a safety zone and is or a Federal, State, or local law directly after the entry for ‘‘Imperial
therefore categorically excluded from enforcement officer designated by or Valley planning area’’ in the
further review under paragraph 34(g) of assisting the COTP to act on his behalf. ‘‘California-PM–10’’ table and reading
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant (4) Vessel operators must contact the ‘‘Rest of State; 11/15/90; Unclassifiable’’
Instruction. An environmental analysis COTP via the Command Center to was deleted inadvertently when the
checklist supporting this determination obtain permission to enter or operate entry for ‘‘Imperial Valley planning
and a Categorical Exclusion within the safety zone. The COTP may area’’ was amended. For example, see
Determination will be prepared and be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at and compare the ‘‘California-PM–10’’
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES

submitted after publication, and will be 313—568–9560. Vessel operators given table within the July 1, 2012 version to
available in the docket where indicated permission to enter or operate in the the July 1, 2013 version of 40 CFR
under ADDRESSES. We seek any safety zone must comply with all 81.305.
comments or information that may lead directions given to them by the COTP, Consequently, the EPA is publishing
to the discovery of a significant via the Sector Command Center or his this technical amendment to restore the
environmental impact from this rule. on-scene representative. ‘‘Rest of State’’ designation entry within

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:50 Sep 21, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM 22SER1

Document Created: 2015-12-15 09:35:20
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 09:35:20

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from September 22, 2015 until 11:59 p.m. on September 24, 2015. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 10 a.m. on August 25, 2015, until September 22, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this temporary final rule, call or email Chief Petty Officer Jason Hampton, Prevention Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone 313-568- 9616, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 57098
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 57098 - Safety Zone; Dredging, Rouge River, Detroit, MI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 183 (September 22, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard