80 FR 57835 - Letter of Recommendation for Washington State Ferries Liquefied Natural Gas Conversion; Seattle, WA
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 186 (September 25, 2015)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 186 (September 25, 2015)
| Page Range | 57835-57837 | |
| FR Document | 2015-24337 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 186 (Friday, September 25, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 57835-57837] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-24337] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard [Docket No. USCG-2014-0935] Letter of Recommendation for Washington State Ferries Liquefied Natural Gas Conversion; Seattle, WA AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice and response to comments ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: On June 27, 2014, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound received a Letter of Intent (LOI) and Waterway Suitability Assessment (WSA) from Washington State Ferries (WSF) for a proposal to modify existing Washington State Ferry marine terminal operations to include the handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). The LNG would be transferred to and used as a marine fuel by six Issaquah Class Ferries converted to use LNG propulsion systems. In accordance with regulation and policy guidance, the Captain of the Port (COTP), Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound, in cooperation with key port stakeholders, will review and validate the information in the WSA. The COTP will then issue a Letter of Recommendation (LOR) to the State of Washington Department of Transportation that conveys the Coast Guard's recommendation on the suitability of the following waterways for LNG marine traffic as it relates to safety and security: Guemes Channel, Rosario Strait, Thatcher Pass, Harney Channel, Upright Channel, Wasp Channel, San Juan Channel, Spieden Channel, Haro Strait, Sidney Channel, Possession Sound, Admiralty Inlet, Puget Sound, Sinclair Inlet, Rich Passage, Elliot Bay, Admiralty Passage, North East Passage, and Colvos Passage. As part of this validation process, the Coast Guard, on November 12, 2014, published a ``Notice and Request for Comments'' in the Federal Register which solicited public comments to inform the COTP's recommendation. A number of comments were received, including two outside the comment period. This document summarizes those comments, explains whether or not they are appropriate for consideration under regulation, and provides additional information to help inform the public about the various issues raised in them. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about this document call or email LT Sarah Rodi[ntilde]o, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; telephone 206-217-6623, email sarah.e.rodino@uscg.mil. Background In accordance with 33 CFR 127.007, the COTP, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound, received an LOI and WSA from WSF on June 27, 2014 regarding WSF's proposal to modify existing Washington State Ferry marine terminal operations and add the handling of LNG. The LNG would be transferred to and used as a marine fuel by six Issaquah Class Ferries converted to use LNG propulsion systems. The LOI notes that if the conversion is completed, each vessel would require fueling by truck once every 7 to 10 days. Pursuant to 33 CFR 127.009, and using the guidance set forth in reference to the Coast Guard's Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) 01-2011, ``Guidance Related to Waterfront Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Facilities,'' the COTP is reviewing and validating WSF's WSA in cooperation with key port stakeholders. To assist the COTP, the Coast Guard on November 12, 2014 published a ``Notice and Request for Comments'' in the Federal Register (79 FR 67179) seeking public comments on WSF's proposal. Once the COTP finishes the review and validation of WSF's WSA, he will develop the LOR with accompanying analysis and provide it to the State of Washington Department of Transportation as the agency with jurisdiction over WSF's proposed activity. Thirteen comments were received, including two outside the comment period. This document summarizes those comments, explains whether or not they are appropriate for consideration under 33 CFR 127.009, and provides additional information to help inform the public about the various issues raised in them. Comments that fell outside the scope of the WSA but are relevant to the vessel design modifications will be forwarded on to the Coast Guard Marine Safety Center (MSC) to be considered during the design review and approval process in accordance with 46 CFR 71.65-10. WSF's LOI, WSA, and other supporting documentation can be viewed at: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Ferries/Environment/LNG.htm. The public comments received by the Coast Guard can be viewed at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketBrowser;rpp=100;so=DESC;sb=docId;po=0;dct=PS;D=USCG-2014-0935. A copy of NVIC 01-2011 is available for viewing on the Coast Guard's Web site at http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/nvic/2010s.asp. The Coast Guard sincerely appreciates the comments received. Summary and Discussion of Comments Received Cost and Funding of Conversion Multiple comments expressed concern that the proposed conversion is too expensive and that the funding that would pay for the conversion should be spent in a different manner. The COTP's role with regard to WSF's proposal is limited to issuing an LOR to the Washington State Department of Transportation regarding the suitability of the waterway for LNG marine traffic based on the criteria listed in 33 CFR 127.009. Cost of vessel conversion issues fall outside the scope of the LOR. As such, these comments will not be considered by the COTP in issuing the LOR. Pollution Two comments expressed concern that LNG poses a pollution threat to the environment. As an issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider those comments in issuing the LOR. For the public's awareness, the Coast Guard will examine WSF's Emergency and Operations Manuals as required by 33 CFR 127.019 covering the transfer system and transfer procedures. These manuals include but are not limited to LNG release response procedures, local response organizations contact [[Page 57836]] procedures, and emergency shutdown procedures. Security Several comments expressed concern that exposed LNG tanks on the proposed converted ferries pose a security risk. As an issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider those comments in issuing the LOR. For the public's awareness on this topic, the Coast Guard oversees a multilayered security framework under 33 CFR parts 101-105 to enhance maritime security throughout the Puget Sound region. If the WSF proposal is approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation, the marine terminal would be required to submit a facility security plan in accordance with 33 CFR part 105. Washington State Ferries is currently required to comply with 33 CFR part 104 which requires in-depth security assessments and Coast Guard-approved vessel security plans. WSF currently has Coast Guard-approved vessel security plans covering each of its vessels. These security plans would be reviewed and amended as necessary to reflect the conversion to LNG fuel. Design of Converted Ferries Multiple comments expressed concern about the design of the proposed converted ferries and that the use of LNG poses an unnecessary risk to passengers. The COTP's role with regards to the subject proposal is limited to issuing an LOR to the Washington State Department of Transportation regarding the suitability of the waterway for LNG marine traffic based on the items listed in 33 CFR 127.009. This comment fell outside the scope of the Waterways Suitability Assessment but is relevant to the vessel design modification and will be forwarded on to the Coast Guard MSC to be considered during the design approval process in accordance with 46 CFR 71.65-10. At this time, final plans have not been submitted by WSF to MSC. One comment stated that WSF should be required to update its Emergency Manual and include it as part of the docket. This comment fell outside the scope of the WSA but for the public's awareness, Operations and Emergency Manuals are required under 33 CFR 127.019. As such, the Coast Guard will examine Emergency and Operation Manuals for compliance with 33 CFR 127.305 and 33 CFR 127.307. WSF will be required to submit copies of these manuals to the COTP 30 days prior to transferring LNG. The COTP may also require WSF to update other required safety plans as necessary. Two comments expressed concern that a seaplane or other aircraft could collide with an LNG tank onboard a converted ferry. As an issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider those comments in issuing the LOR. For the public's awareness on this topic, historical data shows that instances of unintentional aircraft collisions with ferries are extremely low. Malicious or intentional collisions will be considered in the security threat mitigation strategies explained previously. Two comments expressed concern that a large commercial vessel could collide with a converted ferry carrying LNG causing a tank rupture and explosion. As an issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider those comments in issuing the LOR. For the public's awareness on this topic, the risk of collision between large commercial vessels is mitigated significantly through a number of systems, processes, and requirements already in place today including the Coast Guard's Vessel Traffic Service (VTS), Automated Identification System (AIS), and Automatic Radar Plotting Aids (ARPA) as well as established traffic separation schemes and the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS) Navigation Rules governing vessel navigation. In addition, Federal and state laws require large vessels transiting within Puget Sound, including WSF ferries, to be under the direction and control of a federally licensed pilot. A federally licensed pilot is an experienced navigator with expertise specific to Puget Sound who provides significant risk mitigation in regards to collisions. Of note, VTS Puget Sound closely monitors and, as necessary, directs all large commercial vessel traffic throughout the Puget Sound including the routes transited by the Issaquah class ferries. The Issaquah class ferry routes have remained unchanged for at least 55 years and there are no proposed changes to the routes. One comment expressed the opinion that the Coast Guard should define strict criteria for conducting risk analysis and research. The Coast Guard in our role as stewards of safety and security in the maritime arena regularly integrate risk management into every aspect of our maritime governance and operations. 33 CFR part 127 and NVIC 01- 2011 contain tailored requirements and guidance based on risk. In addition, the Coast Guard has commissioned studies from Sandia National Laboratories to examine the risks associated with potential LNG spills. These reports are titled ``Guidance on Risk Analysis and Safety Implication of a Large Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Over Water'' (2004) and ``Breach and Safety Analysis of Spills over Water from Large Liquefied Natural Gas Carriers'' (2008). These studies are available online at: http://www.energy.ca.gov/lng/documents/2004-12_SANDIA-DOE_RISK_ANALYSIS.PDF and http://www.lngfacts.org/resources/SANDIA_2008_Report_-_Large_LNG_Vessel_Sa.pdf. Further, NVIC 01-11 was written based on Risk Based Decision Making, COMDTINST M16010.3, which can be found at: http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg5211/risk.asp. One comment expressed concern about WSF's plan to fuel the converted ferries by parking a tank truck on the terminal transfer span, placing the vehicle on an inclined plane. As an issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider this comment in issuing the LOR. For the public's awareness, the Coast Guard will examine WSF's Operations Manual as required by 33 CFR 127.019 covering the transfer system and transfer procedures. Regulatory Guidance One comment expressed concern that currently there are no Federal regulations regarding LNG fueled passenger vessels. The commenter is correct that there are currently no Federal regulations in place that specifically govern the installation and use of LNG as a marine fuel. This concept is new in the United States, although it is more commonly used internationally. The Coast Guard has issued vessel design and LNG bunkering policy documents that provide guidelines for facility and vessel owner operators to use in consideration of facility operations and vessel design. Those documents can be found at: http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/lgcncoe/docs/Bunking%20Policy%20LTR.pdf and http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/lgcncoe/docs/LNGF%20Policy%20LTR.pdf. One comment expressed concern that there is not explicit guidance regarding the criteria for developing or evaluating a WSA. The requirements and guidance are located in 33 CFR 127.007 and NVIC 01-11. Problems With the WSA One comment expressed concern that the WSA referenced unverified probability calculations for tank collisions from SOLAS Chapter II-1. As an issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider those comments in issuing the LOR. For the public's awareness on this topic, there is a lack [[Page 57837]] of historical information regarding tank collision probabilities, due to a lack of previous occurrences. However, it should be noted that the current resources available for mitigating vessel collisions (previously described above) considerably reduce the probability of vessel collisions. One comment stated that the SOLAS model used for collision damage in the WSA is meant to be used on vessels designed for an ocean route and the WSF ferries were constructed for lakes, bays and sounds route. As an issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider those comments in issuing the LOR. For the public's awareness on this topic, DNV-GL determined that the use of this model was the best approach available because a probability model does not exist for a vessel of similar structure as the WSF ferries. One commenter stated that DNV did not utilize the correct tank volume of fuel in the risk assessment models. The correct tank volume was incorporated in Revision 03 of the WSA. One comment stated that DNV-GL used inappropriate ignition probability models when utilizing the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP) Scenario 24 Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) Vessels Gas model. As an issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider those comments in issuing the LOR. For the public's awareness on this topic, no statistically significant data exists for ignition probability models for LNG as fuel onboard passenger ferries. The model used by DNV-GL is meant to model ignition probability onboard larger scale offshore vessels and was chosen because it represents a more conservative and representative model for application to the WSF vessel design. One comment expressed concern that the societal risks identified in the WSA required that risks falling in the range between ``broadly acceptable'' and ``maximum tolerable'' be mitigated so that they are As Low As Reasonably Possible (ALARP) and that the WSA did not address mitigating factors to reach the ALARP mitigation. As an issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider those comments in issuing the LOR. During the validation process, the COTP will determine if appropriate risk management strategies have been identified. One comment expressed concern that the WSA was not completed objectively and appears to be incomplete. As an issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider those comments in issuing the LOR. As part of the LOR process and in accordance with NVIC 01-2011, the COTP has been and will continue to review and validate the WSA in cooperation with key port stakeholders. This validation will determine if the WSA presents a realistic and credible analysis of the public safety and security implications of introducing LNG marine traffic into the port and waterway. This response to comments is issued under authority of 33 CFR 127.009. Dated: August 20, 2015. M. W. Raymond, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Puget Sound. [FR Doc. 2015-24337 Filed 9-24-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 186 / Friday, September 25, 2015 / Notices 57835
streamlined years, only during the Guard’s recommendation on the agency with jurisdiction over WSF’s
triennial comprehensive review. suitability of the following waterways proposed activity.
On September 1, 2014, the Coast for LNG marine traffic as it relates to Thirteen comments were received,
Guard recertified the Cook Inlet safety and security: Guemes Channel, including two outside the comment
Regional Citizen’s Advisory Council Rosario Strait, Thatcher Pass, Harney period. This document summarizes
through August 31, 2015. Under the Oil Channel, Upright Channel, Wasp those comments, explains whether or
Terminal and Oil Tanker Environmental Channel, San Juan Channel, Spieden not they are appropriate for
Oversight Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2732), Channel, Haro Strait, Sidney Channel, consideration under 33 CFR 127.009,
the Coast Guard may certify, on an Possession Sound, Admiralty Inlet, and provides additional information to
annual basis, an alternative voluntary Puget Sound, Sinclair Inlet, Rich help inform the public about the various
advisory group for Cook Inlet, Alaska. Passage, Elliot Bay, Admiralty Passage, issues raised in them. Comments that
This advisory group monitors the North East Passage, and Colvos Passage. fell outside the scope of the WSA but
activities of terminal facilities and crude As part of this validation process, the are relevant to the vessel design
oil tankers under the Cook Inlet Program Coast Guard, on November 12, 2014, modifications will be forwarded on to
established by Congress, 33 U.S.C. 2732 published a ‘‘Notice and Request for the Coast Guard Marine Safety Center
(b). Comments’’ in the Federal Register (MSC) to be considered during the
Recertification which solicited public comments to design review and approval process in
inform the COTP’s recommendation. A accordance with 46 CFR 71.65–10.
By letter dated August 20, 2015, the number of comments were received,
Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard WSF’s LOI, WSA, and other
including two outside the comment supporting documentation can be
certified that the CIRCAC qualifies as an period. This document summarizes
alternative voluntary advisory group viewed at: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/
those comments, explains whether or Ferries/Environment/LNG.htm. The
under 33 U.S.C. 2732(o). This not they are appropriate for
recertification terminates on August 31, public comments received by the Coast
consideration under regulation, and Guard can be viewed at: http://www.
2016. provides additional information to help regulations.gov/#!docketBrowser;rpp=
Dated: August 20, 2015. inform the public about the various 100;so=DESC;sb=docId;po=0;dct=PS;D=
D. B. Abel, issues raised in them. USCG–2014–0935. A copy of NVIC 01–
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 2011 is available for viewing on the
Seventeenth Coast Guard District. further information about this document Coast Guard’s Web site at http://www.
[FR Doc. 2015–24335 Filed 9–24–15; 8:45 am] call or email LT Sarah Rodiño, Coast uscg.mil/hq/cg5/nvic/2010s.asp.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P Guard Sector Puget Sound; telephone The Coast Guard sincerely appreciates
206–217–6623, email sarah.e.rodino@ the comments received.
uscg.mil.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Summary and Discussion of Comments
SECURITY Background Received
In accordance with 33 CFR 127.007, Cost and Funding of Conversion
Coast Guard
the COTP, Coast Guard Sector Puget
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0935] Sound, received an LOI and WSA from Multiple comments expressed
WSF on June 27, 2014 regarding WSF’s concern that the proposed conversion is
Letter of Recommendation for proposal to modify existing Washington too expensive and that the funding that
Washington State Ferries Liquefied State Ferry marine terminal operations would pay for the conversion should be
Natural Gas Conversion; Seattle, WA and add the handling of LNG. The LNG spent in a different manner. The COTP’s
Coast Guard, DHS.
AGENCY: would be transferred to and used as a role with regard to WSF’s proposal is
marine fuel by six Issaquah Class Ferries limited to issuing an LOR to the
Notice and response to
ACTION:
converted to use LNG propulsion Washington State Department of
comments
systems. The LOI notes that if the Transportation regarding the suitability
SUMMARY: On June 27, 2014, Coast conversion is completed, each vessel of the waterway for LNG marine traffic
Guard Sector Puget Sound received a would require fueling by truck once based on the criteria listed in 33 CFR
Letter of Intent (LOI) and Waterway every 7 to 10 days. 127.009. Cost of vessel conversion
Suitability Assessment (WSA) from Pursuant to 33 CFR 127.009, and issues fall outside the scope of the LOR.
Washington State Ferries (WSF) for a using the guidance set forth in reference As such, these comments will not be
proposal to modify existing Washington to the Coast Guard’s Navigation and considered by the COTP in issuing the
State Ferry marine terminal operations Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) 01– LOR.
to include the handling of Liquefied 2011, ‘‘Guidance Related to Waterfront Pollution
Natural Gas (LNG). The LNG would be Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Facilities,’’
transferred to and used as a marine fuel the COTP is reviewing and validating Two comments expressed concern
by six Issaquah Class Ferries converted WSF’s WSA in cooperation with key that LNG poses a pollution threat to the
to use LNG propulsion systems. In port stakeholders. To assist the COTP, environment. As an issue relevant under
accordance with regulation and policy the Coast Guard on November 12, 2014 33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider
guidance, the Captain of the Port published a ‘‘Notice and Request for those comments in issuing the LOR. For
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(COTP), Coast Guard Sector Puget Comments’’ in the Federal Register (79 the public’s awareness, the Coast Guard
Sound, in cooperation with key port FR 67179) seeking public comments on will examine WSF’s Emergency and
stakeholders, will review and validate WSF’s proposal. Once the COTP Operations Manuals as required by 33
the information in the WSA. The COTP finishes the review and validation of CFR 127.019 covering the transfer
will then issue a Letter of WSF’s WSA, he will develop the LOR system and transfer procedures. These
Recommendation (LOR) to the State of with accompanying analysis and manuals include but are not limited to
Washington Department of provide it to the State of Washington LNG release response procedures, local
Transportation that conveys the Coast Department of Transportation as the response organizations contact
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:58 Sep 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM 25SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_58021/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 186 / Friday, September 25, 2015 / Notices 57837
of historical information regarding tank process and in accordance with NVIC DATES: Comments are to be submitted
collision probabilities, due to a lack of 01–2011, the COTP has been and will on or before December 24, 2015.
previous occurrences. However, it continue to review and validate the ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and
should be noted that the current WSA in cooperation with key port where applicable, the FIS report for
resources available for mitigating vessel stakeholders. This validation will each community are available for
collisions (previously described above) determine if the WSA presents a inspection at both the online location
considerably reduce the probability of realistic and credible analysis of the and the respective Community Map
vessel collisions. public safety and security implications Repository address listed in the tables
One comment stated that the SOLAS of introducing LNG marine traffic into below. Additionally, the current
model used for collision damage in the the port and waterway. effective FIRM and FIS report for each
WSA is meant to be used on vessels This response to comments is issued community are accessible online
designed for an ocean route and the under authority of 33 CFR 127.009. through the FEMA Map Service Center
WSF ferries were constructed for lakes, at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
bays and sounds route. As an issue Dated: August 20, 2015.
You may submit comments, identified
relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the M. W. Raymond, by Docket No. FEMA–B–1530, to Luis
COTP will consider those comments in Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
issuing the LOR. For the public’s Port, Sector Puget Sound. Management Branch, Federal Insurance
awareness on this topic, DNV–GL [FR Doc. 2015–24337 Filed 9–24–15; 8:45 am] and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
determined that the use of this model BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
was the best approach available because 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email)
a probability model does not exist for a Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.
vessel of similar structure as the WSF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
ferries. SECURITY
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
One commenter stated that DNV did
Federal Emergency Management Management Branch, Federal Insurance
not utilize the correct tank volume of
Agency and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
fuel in the risk assessment models. The
500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
correct tank volume was incorporated in
20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email)
Revision 03 of the WSA. [Docket ID FEMA–2015–0001; Internal
One comment stated that DNV–GL Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1530] Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov; or visit
used inappropriate ignition probability the FEMA Map Information eXchange
models when utilizing the International Proposed Flood Hazard (FMIX) online at
Association of Oil and Gas Producers Determinations www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/
(OGP) Scenario 24 Floating Production, fmx_main.html.
Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) Vessels AGENCY: Federal Emergency SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA
Gas model. As an issue relevant under Management Agency, DHS. proposes to make flood hazard
33 CFR 127.009, the COTP will consider ACTION: Notice. determinations for each community
those comments in issuing the LOR. For listed below, in accordance with section
the public’s awareness on this topic, no SUMMARY: Comments are requested on 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act
statistically significant data exists for proposed flood hazard determinations, of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR
ignition probability models for LNG as which may include additions or 67.4(a).
fuel onboard passenger ferries. The modifications of any Base Flood These proposed flood hazard
model used by DNV–GL is meant to Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, determinations, together with the
model ignition probability onboard Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) floodplain management criteria required
larger scale offshore vessels and was boundary or zone designation, or by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that
chosen because it represents a more regulatory floodway on the Flood are required. They should not be
conservative and representative model Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and construed to mean that the community
for application to the WSF vessel where applicable, in the supporting must change any existing ordinances
design. Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for that are more stringent in their
One comment expressed concern that the communities listed in the table floodplain management requirements.
the societal risks identified in the WSA below. The purpose of this notice is to The community may at any time enact
required that risks falling in the range seek general information and comment stricter requirements of its own or
between ‘‘broadly acceptable’’ and regarding the preliminary FIRM, and pursuant to policies established by other
‘‘maximum tolerable’’ be mitigated so where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal, State, or regional entities.
that they are As Low As Reasonably Federal Emergency Management Agency These flood hazard determinations are
Possible (ALARP) and that the WSA did (FEMA) has provided to the affected used to meet the floodplain
not address mitigating factors to reach communities. The FIRM and FIS report management requirements of the NFIP
the ALARP mitigation. As an issue are the basis of the floodplain and also are used to calculate the
relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, the management measures that the appropriate flood insurance premium
COTP will consider those comments in community is required either to adopt rates for new buildings built after the
issuing the LOR. During the validation or to show evidence of having in effect FIRM and FIS report become effective.
process, the COTP will determine if in order to qualify or remain qualified The communities affected by the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
appropriate risk management strategies for participation in the National Flood flood hazard determinations are
have been identified. Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, provided in the tables below. Any
One comment expressed concern that the FIRM and FIS report, once effective, request for reconsideration of the
the WSA was not completed objectively will be used by insurance agents and revised flood hazard information shown
and appears to be incomplete. As an others to calculate appropriate flood on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS report
issue relevant under 33 CFR 127.009, insurance premium rates for new that satisfies the data requirements
the COTP will consider those comments buildings and the contents of those outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b) is considered
in issuing the LOR. As part of the LOR buildings. an appeal. Comments unrelated to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:58 Sep 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM 25SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_58021/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-26 10:19:49
Document Modified: 2018-02-26 10:19:49
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice and response to comments | |
| Contact | For further information about this document call or email LT Sarah Rodi[ntilde]o, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; telephone 206-217-6623, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 57835 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR