80 FR 59733 - Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Spain, and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 191 (October 2, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 191 (October 2, 2015)
| Page Range | 59733-59734 | |
| FR Document | 2015-25151 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 191 (Friday, October 2, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 59733-59734] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-25151] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-475-820, A-588-843, A-580-829, A-469-807, A-583-828] Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Spain, and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on stainless steel wire rod (SSWR) from Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea (Korea), Spain, and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of this notice. DATES: Effective Date: October 2, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Bailey or Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0193 or (202) 482-3874, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 1, 2015, the Department published the notice of initiation of the third sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on SSWR from Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\1\ On May 15, 2015, the Department received a Notice of Intent to Participate in these reviews from Carpenter Technology Corporation (Carpenter), a domestic interested party, within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). Carpenter claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a manufacturer of a domestic-like product in the United States. On June 1, 2015, we received a complete substantive response for each review from the domestic interested party within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\2\ [[Page 59734]] We received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties with respect to any of the orders covered by these sunset reviews, nor was a hearing requested. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department is conducting expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of these orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (''Sunset'') Reviews, 80 FR 24900 (May 1, 2015). \2\ See June 1, 2015, letters from the petitioners regarding ``Five-Year (3rd Sunset) Review of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan Substantive Response.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Orders The merchandise subject to these orders is SSWR. The products subject to these orders are currently classifiable under subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and 7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of these orders is dispositive.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ A full description of the scope of the orders is contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Spain, and Taiwan'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these reviews, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the orders were revoked, are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Reviews Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1),(2) and (3) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on SSWR from Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping up to the following weighted-average margin percentages: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average County margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Italy...................................................... 11.25 Japan...................................................... 33.58 Korea...................................................... 28.44 Spain...................................................... 2.71 Taiwan..................................................... 2.22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notification to Interested Parties This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: August 27, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-25151 Filed 10-1-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Notices 59733
through February 28, 2014, are as manufacturer is, then the cash deposit DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
follows: rate will be the rate established for the
most recently completed segment of this International Trade Administration
Weighted- proceeding for the manufacturer of the
average [A–475–820, A–588–843, A–580–829, A–469–
Producer/Exporter dumping merchandise; and (4) if neither the 807, A–583–828]
margin exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
(percent) covered in this or any previous review Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Italy,
or the LTFV investigation, then the cash Japan, the Republic of Korea, Spain,
Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Pub- and Taiwan: Final Results of the
lic) Company, Ltd .............. 0.00 deposit rate will be the ‘‘all-others’’ rate Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Pacific Pipe Company Lim- of 15.67 percent established in the LTFV
ited .................................... 0.00 investigation.6 These deposit rates,
Antidumping Duty Orders
when imposed, shall remain in effect AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Assessment Rates until further notice. International Trade Administration,
In accordance with 19 CFR Notifications Department of Commerce.
351.106(c)(2) and the Final Modification SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset
for Reviews,4 the Department will This notice serves as a final reminder reviews, the Department of Commerce
instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate to importers of their responsibility (the Department) finds that revocation
entries for Saha Thai and Pacific Pipe under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a of the antidumping duty orders on
without regard to antidumping duties. certificate regarding the reimbursement stainless steel wire rod (SSWR) from
The Department clarified its of antidumping duties prior to Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on liquidation of the relevant entries (Korea), Spain, and Taiwan would be
May 6, 2003.5 This clarification applies during this review period. Failure to likely to lead to continuation or
to entries of subject merchandise during comply with this requirement could recurrence of dumping at the levels
the POR produced by Saha Thai and indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset
result in the Secretary’s presumption
Pacific Pipe for which it did not know Reviews’’ section of this notice.
that reimbursement of antidumping
its merchandise was destined for the DATES: Effective Date: October 2, 2015.
United States. In such instances, we will duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed Stephen Bailey or Elizabeth Eastwood,
entries at the all-others rate if there is no duties.
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
rate for the intermediate company(ies) This notice also serves as a reminder
Enforcement and Compliance,
involved in the transaction. to parties subject to administrative
We intend to issue instructions to International Trade Administration,
protective order (APO) of their U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
CBP 15 days after publication of the responsibility concerning the
final results of this review. Street and Constitution Avenue NW,
destruction of proprietary information Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
Cash Deposit Requirements disclosed under APO in accordance 482–0193 or (202) 482–3874,
The following cash deposit with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely respectively.
requirements will be effective upon written notification of the return or
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
publication of the notice of final results destruction of APO materials or
of administrative review for all conversion to judicial protective order is Background
shipments of circular welded carbon hereby requested. Failure to comply On May 1, 2015, the Department
steel pipes and tubes from Thailand with the regulations and terms of an published the notice of initiation of the
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, APO is a sanctionable violation. third sunset reviews of the antidumping
for consumption on or after the date of The Department is issuing and duty orders on SSWR from Italy, Japan,
publication as provided by section publishing these final results of Korea, Spain, and Taiwan, pursuant to
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit administrative review in accordance section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
rate for Saha Thai and Pacific Pipe will with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of as amended (the Act).1 On May 15,
be 0.00 percent, the weighted-average the Act. 2015, the Department received a Notice
dumping margin established in the final of Intent to Participate in these reviews
results of this administrative review; (2) Dated: September 25, 2015.
from Carpenter Technology Corporation
for previously reviewed or investigated Paul Piquado, (Carpenter), a domestic interested party,
companies not listed above, the cash Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
deposit rate will continue to be the Compliance. 351.218(d)(1)(i). Carpenter claimed
company-specific rate published for the [FR Doc. 2015–25168 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am] interested party status under section
most recently completed segment of this BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a manufacturer
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a of a domestic-like product in the United
firm covered in this review, a prior States. On June 1, 2015, we received a
review, or the less than fair value complete substantive response for each
(LTFV) investigation, but the review from the domestic interested
party within the 30-day deadline
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).2
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (’’Sunset’’) Reviews,
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 80 FR 24900 (May 1, 2015).
Reviews). 2 See June 1, 2015, letters from the petitioners
5 For a full discussion of this clarification, see regarding ‘‘Five-Year (3rd Sunset) Review of the
6 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel Wire
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR Rod from Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan
(May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 8341 (March 11, 1986). Substantive Response.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:43 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_59924/page/1.svg)
![59734 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Notices
We received no substantive responses would be likely to lead to continuation SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
from respondent interested parties with or recurrence of dumping up to the review, the Department of Commerce
respect to any of the orders covered by following weighted-average margin (the Department) finds that revocation
these sunset reviews, nor was a hearing percentages: of the antidumping duty order on
requested. As a result, pursuant to certain tissue paper products (tissue
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 Weighted- paper) from the People’s Republic of
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the average China (PRC) would be likely to lead to
County margin
Department is conducting expedited (percent) continuation or recurrence of dumping
(120-day) sunset reviews of these orders. at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final
Italy ........................................... 11.25 Results of Sunset Review’’ section of
Scope of the Orders Japan ........................................ 33.58 this notice.
The merchandise subject to these Korea ........................................ 28.44
orders is SSWR. The products subject to Spain ......................................... 2.71 DATES: Effective Date: October 2, 2015.
these orders are currently classifiable Taiwan ...................................... 2.22
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Terre Keaton
under subheadings 7221.00.0005, Stefanova or Brian Smith, AD/CVD
7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030, Notification to Interested Parties
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
7221.00.0045, and 7221.00.0075 of the This notice serves as the only Compliance, International Trade
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the reminder to parties subject to an Administration, U.S. Department of
United States (HTSUS). Although the administrative protective order (APO) of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
HTSUS subheadings are provided for their responsibility concerning the Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
convenience and customs purposes, the return or destruction of proprietary telephone: (202) 482–1280 or (202) 482–
written description of the scope of these information disclosed under APO in 1766, respectively.
orders is dispositive.3 accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Analysis of Comments Received
destruction of APO materials or Background
All issues raised in these reviews, conversion to judicial protective order is
including the likelihood of continuation hereby requested. Failure to comply On March 30, 2005, the Department
or recurrence of dumping in the event with the regulations and terms of an published the antidumping duty order
of revocation and the magnitude of the APO is a violation which is subject to on tissue paper from the PRC.1 On June
margins likely to prevail if the orders sanction. 1, 2015, the Department published the
were revoked, are addressed in the We are issuing and publishing these notice of initiation of the second sunset
accompanying Issues and Decision results and notice in accordance with review of the antidumping duty order
Memorandum. The Issues and Decision sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of on tissue paper from the PRC pursuant
Memorandum is a public document and the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
is on file electronically via Enforcement Dated: August 27, 2015. 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On June
and Compliance’s Antidumping and 15, 2015, the Department received a
Paul Piquado,
Countervailing Duty Centralized Notice of Intent to Participate in this
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance. review from the following domestic
ACCESS is available to registered users producers of tissue paper: Seaman Paper
at http://access.trade.gov, and to all Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in Company of Massachusetts, Inc., Eagle
parties in the Central Records Unit, the Issues and Decision Memorandum Tissue LLC, Flower City Tissue Mills
room B8024 of the main Department of I. Summary Co. and Garlock Printing & Converting
Commerce building. In addition, a II. Background Inc. (collectively, ‘‘the petitioners’’),
complete version of the Issues and III. Scope of the Orders within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
Decision Memorandum can be accessed IV. History of the Orders 351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioners claimed
directly on the Internet at http:// V. Legal Framework interested party status under section
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed VI. Discussion of the Issues
771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers,
Issues and Decision Memorandum and 1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping producers or wholesalers of a domestic
the electronic version of the Issues and like product in the United States. On
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to
Decision Memorandum are identical in Prevail June 30, 2015, we received a complete
content. VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews substantive response from the
Final Results of Sunset Reviews VIII. Recommendation petitioners within the 30-day deadline
[FR Doc. 2015–25151 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am] specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).3
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P We received no substantive responses
752(c)(1),(2) and (3) of the Act, we
from any respondent interested parties.
determine that revocation of the
As a result, pursuant to section
antidumping duty orders on SSWR from DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
International Trade Administration
3A full description of the scope of the orders is
contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, [A–570–894] 1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Certain Tissue Paper Products From Duty Order: Certain Tissue Paper Products From the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and the People’s Republic of China: Final People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 16223 (March 30,
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and 2005) (Order).
Results of Expedited Sunset Review of 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80
Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on
the Antidumping Duty Order FR 31012 (June 1, 2015).
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy, Japan, the 3 See June 30, 2015, letter from the petitioners
Republic of Korea, Spain, and Taiwan’’ (Issues and
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, regarding ‘‘Certain Tissue Paper Products from the
Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with International Trade Administration, People’s Republic of China: Substantive Response
these results and hereby adopted by this notice. Department of Commerce. to Notice of Initiation.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:43 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_59924/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 08:45:14
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 08:45:14
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Stephen Bailey or Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0193 or (202) 482-3874, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 59733 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR