80 FR 60307 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 193 (October 6, 2015)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 193 (October 6, 2015)
| Page Range | 60307-60310 | |
| FR Document | 2015-25271 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 193 (Tuesday, October 6, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 60307-60310] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-25271] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2015-3982; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-098-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 717-200 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by multiple reports of the vertical stabilizer leading edge showing signs of fastener distress. This proposed AD would require a detailed inspection for any distress of the vertical stabilizer leading edge skin, and related investigative and corrective actions, if necessary. This proposed AD would also require, for certain airplanes, repetitive detailed inspections of the spar cap for any loose and missing fasteners, repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) and radiographic testing (RT) inspections of the spar cap for any crack, and related investigative and corrective actions, if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct any crack in the vertical stabilizer leading edge and front spar cap, which may result in the structure becoming unable to support limit load, and may lead to the loss of the vertical stabilizer. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 20, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Fax: 202-493-2251. Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, CA 90846-0001; telephone: 206-544-5000, extension 2; fax: 206-766-5683; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-3982. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015- 3982; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, [[Page 60308]] except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Schrieber, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5348; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-3982; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-098-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion We have received reports of ten cases of the vertical stabilizer leading edge on Model 717 airplanes showing signs of fastener distress at the splice station Zfs=52.267. The affected Model 717 airplanes had accrued 22,594 through 40,985 flight hours and 15,352 through 34,766 landing cycles. Similar reports have been found on Model MD-80 and MD- 90 airplanes. One Model MD-90 operator reported finding elongated fastener holes at the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer at station Zfs=52.267. The affected Model MD-90 airplane had accrued 15,555 flight-hours and 14,310 landing cycles. Two Model MD-80 operators reported finding a cracked vertical stabilizer skin at station Zfs=52.267; subsequent inspections revealed a severed front spar cap and a cracked front spar web. The affected Model MD-80 airplanes had accrued between 39,749 through 56,212 flight-hours and 32,176 through 44,001 landing cycles when the crack/anomalies were found. Missing fasteners or evidence of elongated fastener holes may be considered an indication that there are undetected cracks in the underlying vertical stabilizer structure. Boeing investigation determined that high loading occurrences, such as, but not limited to, in-flight turbulence can adversely impact the fasteners and loading at the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer. This condition, if not corrected, could result in the structure unable to support limit load, and may lead to the loss of the vertical stabilizer. Other Relevant Rulemaking On May 31, 2011, we issued AD 2011-12-12, Amendment 39-16719 (76 FR 35342, June 17, 2011), for certain The Boeing Company Model MD-90-30 airplanes. That AD requires a detailed inspection to detect distress and existing repairs to the leading edge structure of the vertical stabilizer at the splice at station Zfs=52.267; repetitive inspections for cracking in the front spar cap forward flanges of the vertical stabilizer, and either the aft flanges or side skins; repetitive inspections for loose and missing fasteners; and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We issued that AD to detect and correct such cracking damage, which could result in the structure being unable to support limit load, and could lead to the loss of the vertical stabilizer. On July 1, 2011, we issued AD 2011-15-01, Amendment 39-16748 (76 FR 41651, July 15, 2011), for certain The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88 airplanes. That AD requires a detailed inspection to detect distress and existing repairs to the leading edge structure of the vertical stabilizer at the splice at station Zfs=52.267; repetitive inspections for cracking in the front spar cap forward flanges of the vertical stabilizer, and either the aft flanges or side skins; repetitive inspections for loose and missing fasteners; and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We issued that AD to detect and correct such cracking damage, which could result in the structure being unable to support limit load, and could lead to the loss of the vertical stabilizer. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015. The service information describes procedures for a detailed inspection for any distress of the vertical stabilizer leading edge skin, a detailed inspection for any loose and missing fasteners of the spar cap, HFEC and RT inspections of the spar cap for any crack, and related investigative and corrective actions. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM. FAA's Determination We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design. Proposed AD Requirements This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service information described previously, except as discussed under ``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the Service Information.'' The phrase ``related investigative actions'' is used in this proposed AD. ``Related investigative actions'' are follow-on actions that (1) are related to the primary action, and (2) further investigate the nature of any condition found. Related investigative actions in an AD could include, for example, inspections. The phrase ``corrective actions'' is used in this proposed AD. ``Corrective actions'' are actions that correct or address any condition found. Corrective actions in an AD could include, for example, repairs. Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information The service bulletin specifies to contact the manufacturer for instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD would require repairing those conditions in one of the following ways: In accordance with a method that we approve; or Using data that meet the certification basis of the airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have authorized to make those findings. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this proposed AD affects 106 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD: [[Page 60309]] Estimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost on U.S. Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inspections for distress......... 11 work-hours x $85 $0 $935 per inspection $99,110 per per hour = $935 cycle. inspection cycle. per inspection cycle. Repetitive inspections for 7 work-hours x $85 0 $595 per inspection $63,070 per cracking and loose and missing per hour = $595 cycle. inspection cycle. fasteners. per inspection cycle. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed AD. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2015-3982; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-098-AD. (a) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by November 20, 2015. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 717-200 airplanes, certificated in any category, as specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 55, Stabilizers. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by multiple reports of the vertical stabilizer leading edge showing signs of fastener distress. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct any crack in the vertical stabilizer leading edge and front spar cap, which may result in the structure becoming unable to support limit load, and may lead to the loss of the vertical stabilizer. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Initial Inspection Except as required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, at the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015: Do a detailed inspection for any distress of the vertical stabilizer leading edge skin and do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015, except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions before further flight. (h) Repetitive Inspections For all airplanes on which no cracking was found during any related investigative action required by paragraph (g) of this AD: At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015: Do the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD and do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015, except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the applicable inspection thereafter at the intervals specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015. (1) Do detailed inspections for any for any loose and missing fasteners of the vertical stabilizer leading edge as specified in ``Part 4'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015. (2) Do high frequency eddy current (HFEC) and radiographic testing (RT) inspections for any crack of the vertical stabilizer spar cap as specified in ``Part 2'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015; or do HFEC inspections for any crack of the vertical stabilizer spar cap as specified in ``Part 3'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015. (i) Exceptions to the Service Information (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015 specifies a compliance time ``after the original issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD. (2) If any crack is found during any inspection required by this AD, and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717-55A0012, dated June 12, 2015, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action: Before further flight, repair using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD. [[Page 60310]] (j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (k) Related Information (1) For more information about this AD, contact Eric Schrieber, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5348; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected]. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, CA 90846-0001; telephone: 206-544-5000, extension 2; fax: 206-766-5683; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 27, 2015. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2015-25271 Filed 10-5-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules 60307
Bulletin 747–53A2852, dated June 22, 2012, paragraph (p)(1) of this AD. Information may AD would require a detailed inspection
do HFEC inspections for cracks at the be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC- for any distress of the vertical stabilizer
permanent fastener holes and the upper Requests@faa.gov. leading edge skin, and related
chords of the upper deck floor beams, in (2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
investigative and corrective actions, if
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin or lacking a principal inspector, the manager necessary. This proposed AD would
747–53A2452, Revision 1, dated July 16, of the local flight standards district office/ also require, for certain airplanes,
2012. certificate holding district office. repetitive detailed inspections of the
(1) If any cracking is found during any (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable spar cap for any loose and missing
inspection required by paragraph (k) or level of safety may be used for any repair fasteners, repetitive high frequency
(k)(2)(i) of this AD, before further flight, required by this AD if it is approved by the eddy current (HFEC) and radiographic
repair using a method approved in Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization testing (RT) inspections of the spar cap
accordance with the procedures specified in Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
for any crack, and related investigative
paragraph (o) of this AD.
(2) If no cracking is found during any ACO, to make those findings. For a repair and corrective actions, if necessary. We
inspection required by the introductory text method to be approved, the repair must meet are proposing this AD to detect and
of paragraph (k) or (k)(2)(i) of this AD, do the the certification basis of the airplane, and the correct any crack in the vertical
actions required by paragraphs (k)(2)(i) and approval must specifically refer to this AD. stabilizer leading edge and front spar
(k)(2)(ii) of this AD. cap, which may result in the structure
(p) Related Information
(i) Repeat the inspections specified in becoming unable to support limit load,
paragraph (k) of this AD thereafter at the (1) For more information about this AD,
and may lead to the loss of the vertical
applicable times specified in Tables 8 and 9 contact Roger Caldwell, Aerospace Engineer,
Technical Operations Center, ANM–100D, stabilizer.
of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2452, FAA, Denver Aircraft Certification Office, DATES: We must receive comments on
Revision 1, dated July 16, 2012. 26805 East 68th Avenue, Room 214, Denver, this proposed AD by November 20,
(ii) Within 10,000 flight cycles after CO 80249; phone: 303–342–1086; fax: 303– 2015.
accomplishing the initial HFEC inspections 342–1088; email: roger.caldwell@faa.gov.
required by paragraph (k) of this AD, replace (2) For service information identified in ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
the upper chords of the upper deck floor this AD, contact Boeing Commercial using the procedures found in 14 CFR
beams by doing the actions specified in Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(2) of this AD. Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, methods:
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
(l) Exceptions to Service Information 544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You instructions for submitting comments.
747–53A2452, Revision 1, dated July 16, may view this referenced service information • Fax: 202–493–2251.
2012, specifies a compliance time ‘‘after the at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Revision 1 date of this service bulletin,’’ this
• Mail: U.S. Department of
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
AD requires compliance within the specified Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
information on the availability of this
compliance time after the effective date of material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
this AD. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin Issued in Renton, Washington, on Washington, DC 20590.
747–53A2452, Revision 1, dated July 16, September 27, 2015. • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
2012; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747– Michael Kaszycki, address above between 9 a.m. and 5
53A2852, dated June 22, 2012; specifies to p.m., Monday through Friday, except
contact Boeing for appropriate action: Before Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Federal holidays.
further flight, repair using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures [FR Doc. 2015–25272 Filed 10–5–15; 8:45 am] For service information identified in
specified in paragraph (o) of this AD. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
(m) Credit for Previous Actions & Services Management, 3855
This paragraph provides credit for the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800–0019,
actions required by paragraphs (g), (h), and Long Beach, CA 90846–0001; telephone:
(i) of this AD, if those actions were performed Federal Aviation Administration 206–544–5000, extension 2; fax: 206–
before the effective date of this AD using
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2452,
766–5683; Internet https://
dated April 3, 2003, which was incorporated 14 CFR Part 39 www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
by reference in AD 2005–20–29, Amendment [Docket No. FAA–2015–3982; Directorate
this referenced service information at
39–14326 (70 FR 59246, October 12, 2005). Identifier 2015–NM–098–AD] the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
(n) Special Flight Permit RIN 2120–AA64 Renton, WA. For information on the
Special flight permits, as described in availability of this material at the FAA,
Section 21.197 and Section 21.199 of the Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing call 425–227–1221. It is also available
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 Company Airplanes
and 21.199), are not allowed. on the Internet at http://
AGENCY: Federal Aviation www.regulations.gov by searching for
(o) Alternative Methods of Compliance Administration (FAA), DOT. and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
(AMOCs) 3982.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft (NPRM).
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the Examining the AD Docket
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new You may examine the AD docket on
requested using the procedures found in 14 airworthiness directive (AD) for certain the Internet at http://
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
The Boeing Company Model 717–200 www.regulations.gov by searching for
or local Flight Standards District Office, as airplanes. This proposed AD was and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
appropriate. If sending information directly prompted by multiple reports of the 3982; or in person at the Docket
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the vertical stabilizer leading edge showing Management Facility between 9 a.m.
attention of the person identified in signs of fastener distress. This proposed and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:44 Oct 05, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM 06OCP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_60500/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules 60309
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
Inspections for distress .......... 11 work-hours × $85 per hour $0 $935 per inspection cycle ...... $99,110 per inspection cycle.
= $935 per inspection cycle.
Repetitive inspections for 7 work-hours × $85 per hour 0 $595 per inspection cycle ...... $63,070 per inspection cycle.
cracking and loose and = $595 per inspection cycle.
missing fasteners.
We have received no definitive data List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
that would enable us to provide cost Alert Service Bulletin 717–55A0012, dated
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation June 12, 2015: Do a detailed inspection for
estimates for the on-condition actions safety, Incorporation by reference,
specified in this proposed AD. any distress of the vertical stabilizer leading
Safety. edge skin and do all applicable related
Authority for This Rulemaking The Proposed Amendment investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Title 49 of the United States Code Accordingly, under the authority Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue delegated to me by the Administrator, 717–55A0012, dated June 12, 2015, except as
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Do all
section 106, describes the authority of 39 as follows: applicable related investigative and
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: corrective actions before further flight.
Aviation Programs, describes in more PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS (h) Repetitive Inspections
detail the scope of the Agency’s DIRECTIVES
For all airplanes on which no cracking was
authority. found during any related investigative action
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
We are issuing this rulemaking under required by paragraph (g) of this AD: At the
continues to read as follows: applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that Bulletin 717–55A0012, dated June 12, 2015:
§ 39.13 [Amended] Do the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1)
section, Congress charges the FAA with
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding and (h)(2) of this AD and do all applicable
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in related investigative and corrective actions,
the following new airworthiness
air commerce by prescribing regulations in accordance with the Accomplishment
directive (AD):
for practices, methods, and procedures Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
the Administrator finds necessary for The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 717–55A0012, dated June 12, 2015, except as
safety in air commerce. This regulation 2015–3982; Directorate Identifier 2015– required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Do all
is within the scope of that authority NM–098–AD. applicable related investigative and
because it addresses an unsafe condition (a) Comments Due Date corrective actions before further flight.
that is likely to exist or develop on Repeat the applicable inspection thereafter at
We must receive comments by November the intervals specified in paragraph 1.E.,
products identified in this rulemaking 20, 2015. ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
action. Bulletin 717–55A0012, dated June 12, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
Regulatory Findings (1) Do detailed inspections for any for any
None.
loose and missing fasteners of the vertical
We determined that this proposed AD (c) Applicability stabilizer leading edge as specified in ‘‘Part
would not have federalism implications This AD applies to The Boeing Company 4’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717–
under Executive Order 13132. This Model 717–200 airplanes, certificated in any 55A0012, dated June 12, 2015.
proposed AD would not have a category, as specified in Boeing Alert Service (2) Do high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
Bulletin 717–55A0012, dated June 12, 2015. and radiographic testing (RT) inspections for
substantial direct effect on the States, on
any crack of the vertical stabilizer spar cap
the relationship between the national (d) Subject as specified in ‘‘Part 2’’ of Boeing Alert
Government and the States, or on the Service Bulletin 717–55A0012, dated June
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
distribution of power and America Code 55, Stabilizers. 12, 2015; or do HFEC inspections for any
responsibilities among the various crack of the vertical stabilizer spar cap as
levels of government. (e) Unsafe Condition specified in ‘‘Part 3’’ of Boeing Alert Service
For the reasons discussed above, I This AD was prompted by multiple reports Bulletin 717–55A0012, dated June 12, 2015.
certify this proposed regulation: of the vertical stabilizer leading edge (i) Exceptions to the Service Information
showing signs of fastener distress. We are
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory issuing this AD to detect and correct any (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
action’’ under Executive Order 12866, crack in the vertical stabilizer leading edge 717–55A0012, dated June 12, 2015 specifies
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under and front spar cap, which may result in the a compliance time ‘‘after the original issue
structure becoming unable to support limit date of this service bulletin,’’ this AD
the DOT Regulatory Policies and requires compliance within the specified
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, load, and may lead to the loss of the vertical
stabilizer. compliance time after the effective date of
1979),
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
this AD.
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation (f) Compliance (2) If any crack is found during any
in Alaska, and Comply with this AD within the inspection required by this AD, and Boeing
compliance times specified, unless already Alert Service Bulletin 717–55A0012, dated
(4) Will not have a significant June 12, 2015, specifies to contact Boeing for
done.
economic impact, positive or negative, appropriate action: Before further flight,
on a substantial number of small entities (g) Initial Inspection repair using a method approved in
under the criteria of the Regulatory Except as required by paragraph (i)(1) of accordance with the procedures specified in
Flexibility Act. this AD, at the applicable time specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:44 Oct 05, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM 06OCP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_60500/page/3.svg)
![60310 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION http://www.regulations.gov, as
(AMOCs) described in the system of records
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Federal Aviation Administration notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the be reviewed at http://www.dot.gov/
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 14 CFR Part 93 privacy.
requested using the procedures found in 14 [Docket No.: FAA–2015–3980; Notice No. Docket: Background documents or
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 15–09] comments received may be read at
send your request to your principal inspector http://www.regulations.gov at any time.
or local Flight Standards District Office, as RIN 2120–AK74 Follow the online instructions for
appropriate. If sending information directly accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Pearson Field Airport Special Flight
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the Operations in Room W12–140 of the
Rules Area
attention of the person identified in West Building Ground Floor at 1200
paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information may AGENCY: Federal Aviation New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
be emailed to: 9-ANM-LAACO-AMOC- Administration (FAA), DOT. DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
Requests@faa.gov. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. through Friday, except Federal holidays.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
notify your appropriate principal inspector, SUMMARY: The FAA is proposing to technical questions concerning this
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager establish a Special Flight Rules Area in action, contact Jon M. Stowe, Airspace
of the local flight standards district office/ the vicinity of Pearson Field Airport, and Rules Team, AJV–113, Federal
certificate holding district office. Vancouver, Washington. Pearson Field Aviation Administration, 800
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable Airport is located approximately three Independence Avenue SW.,
level of safety may be used for any repair nautical miles northwest of Portland Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
required by this AD if it is approved by the International Airport, Portland, Oregon. 267–8783; email jon.m.stowe@faa.gov.
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization The close proximity of the airport traffic For legal questions concerning this
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has patterns and approach courses create action, contact Lorelei Peter, Office of
been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles converging flight paths between traffic
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
Chief Counsel, AGC–200, Federal
on approach to Portland International Aviation Administration, 800
method to be approved the repair must meet Airport and traffic at Pearson Field
the certification basis of the airplane and the
Independence Avenue SW.,
Airport, increasing the risk for near mid- Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
approval must specifically refer to this AD. air collision, mid-air collision and wake 267–3073; email lorelei.peter@faa.gov.
(k) Related Information turbulence events. The intended effect
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of this action is to mitigate the
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Eric Schrieber, Aerospace Engineer,
identified risk by establishing operating Authority for This Rulemaking
Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los
requirements applicable to all aircraft The FAA’s authority to issue rules on
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
when operating within a designated area aviation safety is found in title 49 of the
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA at Pearson Field Airport, which would United States Code (49 U.S.C.). Subtitle
90712–4137; phone: 562–627–5348; fax: 562– increase overall system efficiency and I, section 106 describes the authority of
627–5210; email: Eric.Schrieber@faa.gov. safety. the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
(2) For service information identified in DATES: Send comments on or before Aviation Programs, describes in more
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial December 7, 2015. detail the scope of the agency’s
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services ADDRESSES: Send comments identified authority.
Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC by docket number FAA–2015–3980 This rulemaking is promulgated
D800–0019, Long Beach, CA 90846–0001; using any of the following methods: under the authority described in 49
telephone: 206–544–5000, extension 2; fax: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to U.S.C. 106(f), which establishes the
206–766–5683; Internet https:// http://www.regulations.gov and follow authority of the Administrator to
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this the online instructions for sending your promulgate regulations and rules. This
referenced service information at the FAA, comments electronically. rulemaking also is promulgated under
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind • Mail: Send comments to Docket the authority described in 49 U.S.C.
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of 40103, which vests the Administrator
on the availability of this material at the Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey with broad authority to prescribe
FAA, call 425–227–1221. Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West regulations to assign the use of airspace
Issued in Renton, Washington, on Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft
September 27, 2015. 20590–0001. and the efficient use of airspace, and 49
Michael Kaszycki, • Hand Delivery or Courier: Take U.S.C. 44701(a)(5), which requires the
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
comments to Docket Operations in Administrator to promote safe flight of
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Room W12–140 of the West Building civil aircraft in air commerce by
[FR Doc. 2015–25271 Filed 10–5–15; 8:45 am]
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey prescribing regulations and minimum
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 standards for other practices, methods,
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through and procedures necessary for safety in
Friday, except Federal holidays. air commerce and national security.
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251. I. Executive Summary
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. This NPRM proposes to establish a
553(c), DOT solicits comments from the special flight rules area (SFRA) around
public to better inform its rulemaking Pearson Field Airport (Pearson Field) in
process. DOT posts these comments, which pilots would have to follow
without edit, including any personal mandatory procedures. These
information the commenter provides, to procedures are necessary to assist in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:44 Oct 05, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM 06OCP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_60500/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 08:51:14
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 08:51:14
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). | |
| Dates | We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 20, 2015. | |
| Contact | Eric Schrieber, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5348; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 60307 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR