80_FR_61495 80 FR 61298 - Physical Medicine Devices; Reclassification of Shortwave Diathermy for All Other Uses, Henceforth To Be Known as Nonthermal Shortwave Therapy

80 FR 61298 - Physical Medicine Devices; Reclassification of Shortwave Diathermy for All Other Uses, Henceforth To Be Known as Nonthermal Shortwave Therapy

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 197 (October 13, 2015)

Page Range61298-61302
FR Document2015-25923

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing a final order to reclassify shortwave diathermy (SWD) for all other uses, a preamendments class III device, into class II (special controls), and to rename the device ``nonthermal shortwave therapy'' (SWT). FDA is also making a technical correction in the regulation for the carrier frequency for SWD and SWT devices.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 197 (Tuesday, October 13, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 197 (Tuesday, October 13, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61298-61302]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25923]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 890

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0378]


Physical Medicine Devices; Reclassification of Shortwave 
Diathermy for All Other Uses, Henceforth To Be Known as Nonthermal 
Shortwave Therapy

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final order; technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing a final 
order to reclassify shortwave diathermy (SWD) for all other uses, a 
preamendments class III device, into class II (special controls), and 
to rename the device ``nonthermal shortwave therapy'' (SWT). FDA is 
also making a technical correction in the regulation for the carrier 
frequency for SWD and SWT devices.

DATES: This order is effective on October 13, 2015. See further 
discussion in Section IV, ``Implementation Strategy.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Ryan, Center for Devices 
and Radiological Health, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1615, 
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-6283, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background--Regulatory Authorities

    The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), as amended 
by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (the 1976 amendments) (Pub. L. 
94-295), the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-629), the 
Food and

[[Page 61299]]

Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105-115), the 
Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-
250), the Medical Devices Technical Corrections Act (Pub. L. 108-214), 
the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-
85), and the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act 
(FDASIA) (Pub. L. 112-144), among other amendments, established a 
comprehensive system for the regulation of medical devices intended for 
human use. Section 513 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c) established 
three categories (classes) of devices, reflecting the regulatory 
controls needed to provide reasonable assurance of their safety and 
effectiveness. The three categories of devices are class I (general 
controls), class II (special controls), and class III (premarket 
approval).
    Under section 513(d) of the FD&C Act, devices that were in 
commercial distribution before the enactment of the 1976 amendments, 
May 28, 1976 (generally referred to as preamendments devices), are 
classified after FDA has: (1) Received a recommendation from a device 
classification panel (an FDA advisory committee); (2) published the 
panel's recommendation for comment, along with a proposed regulation 
classifying the device; and (3) published a final regulation 
classifying the device. FDA has classified most preamendments devices 
under these procedures.
    Devices that were not in commercial distribution prior to May 28, 
1976 (generally referred to as ``postamendments devices''), are 
automatically classified by section 513(f) of the FD&C Act into class 
III without any FDA rulemaking process. Those devices remain in class 
III and require premarket approval unless, and until, the device is 
reclassified into class I or II or FDA issues an order finding the 
device to be substantially equivalent, in accordance with section 
513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate device that does not require 
premarket approval. The Agency determines whether new devices are 
substantially equivalent to predicate devices by means of premarket 
notification procedures in section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 
360(k)) and 21 CFR part 807.
    A preamendments device that has been classified into class III and 
devices found substantially equivalent by means of premarket 
notification (510(k)) procedures to such a preamendments device or to a 
device within that type (both the preamendments and substantially 
equivalent devices are referred to as preamendments class III devices) 
may be marketed without submission of a premarket approval application 
(PMA) until FDA issues a final order under section 515(b) of the FD&C 
Act (21 U.S.C. 360e(b)) requiring premarket approval.
    On July 9, 2012, FDASIA was enacted. Section 608(a) of FDASIA 
amended section 513(e) of the FD&C Act, changing the mechanism for 
reclassifying a device from rulemaking to an administrative order.
    Section 513(e) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may, by 
administrative order, reclassify a device based upon ``new 
information.'' FDA can initiate a reclassification under section 513(e) 
or an interested person may petition FDA to reclassify a preamendments 
device. The term ``new information,'' as used in section 513(e), 
includes information developed as a result of a reevaluation of the 
data before the Agency when the device was originally classified, as 
well as information not presented, not available, or not developed at 
that time. (See, e.g., Holland-Rantos Co. v. United States Department 
of Health, Education, and Welfare, 587 F.2d 1173, 1174 n.1 (D.C. Cir. 
1978); Upjohn v. Finch, 422 F.2d 944 (6th Cir. 1970); Bell v. Goddard, 
366 F.2d 177 (7th Cir. 1966).)
    Reevaluation of the data previously before the Agency is an 
appropriate basis for subsequent action where the reevaluation is made 
in light of newly available authority (see Bell, 366 F.2d at 181; 
Ethicon, Inc. v. FDA, 762 F.Supp. 382, 388-391 (D.D.C. 1991); or, in 
light of changes in ``medical science,'' Upjohn, 422 F.2d at 951). 
Whether data before the Agency are old or new data, the ``new 
information'' to support reclassification under section 513(e) must be 
``valid scientific evidence'' as defined in section 513(a)(3) of the 
FD&C Act and 21 CFR 860.7(c)(2). (See, e.g., Gen. Medical Co. v. FDA, 
770 F.2d 214 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Contact Lens Mfrs. Ass'n v. FDA, 766 
F.2d 592 (D.C. Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062 (1986).)
    FDA relies upon ``valid scientific evidence'' in the classification 
process to determine the level of regulation for devices. To be 
considered in the reclassification process, the ``valid scientific 
evidence'' upon which the Agency relies must be publicly available. 
Publicly available information excludes trade secret and/or 
confidential commercial information, e.g., the contents of a pending 
PMA. (See section 520(c) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360j(c)).)
    Section 513(e)(1) of the FD&C Act sets forth the process for 
issuing a final reclassification order. Specifically, prior to the 
issuance of a final order reclassifying a device, the following must 
occur: (1) Publication of a proposed order in the Federal Register; (2) 
a meeting of a device classification panel described in section 513(b) 
of the FD&C Act; and (3) consideration of comments to a public docket. 
FDA published a proposed order to reclassify this device in the Federal 
Register of February 20, 2014 (79 FR 9671). FDA has held a meeting of a 
device classification panel described in section 513(b) of the FD&C Act 
to discuss shortwave diathermy for all other uses, and therefore, has 
met this requirement under section 513(e)(1) of the FD&C Act. As 
explained further in section II of the proposed order, a meeting of a 
device classification panel described in section 513(b) of the FD&C Act 
took place on May 21, 2013. FDA received and has considered several 
comments on this proposed order, as discussed in Section II.

II. Public Comments in Response to the Proposed Order

    In response to the February 20, 2014, proposed order to reclassify 
shortwave diathermy for all other uses and to rename the device 
``nonthermal shortwave therapy,'' FDA received 40 comments from 
industry, a patient advocacy group, and consumers of SWT devices. Of 
those, 35 comments were received from users of specific devices who 
support the use and availability of those devices in the United States. 
Several of these comments also supported reclassification into class 
II. This final order reclassifies into class II SWT devices intended 
for adjunctive use in the palliative treatment of postoperative pain 
and edema of soft tissue by means other than the generation of deep 
heat within body tissues and establishes special controls that are 
intended to mitigate risks to health of SWT devices in order to provide 
a reasonable assurance of their safety and effectiveness. These special 
controls are meant to protect patients from unsafe or ineffective SWT 
devices.
    Six of the comments from users also requested that the prescription 
use restriction be removed from the proposed regulation so that SWT 
devices could be available over-the-counter (OTC). This final order 
applies only to SWT devices for the indications and uses that have been 
previously cleared for marketing. To date, FDA has not cleared an SWT 
device for OTC use and, as a result, has limited the reclassification 
in this final order to prescription use devices. However, if FDA 
receives a marketing application in the future for an SWT device 
indicated

[[Page 61300]]

for OTC use, FDA would make its classification decision regarding such 
use at that time.
    One public comment FDA received requested that SWT devices remain 
classified in class III, and that FDA call for PMAs. FDA disagrees that 
SWT devices should remain in class III and require PMA approval. On May 
21, 2013, FDA held a meeting of the Orthopedic and Rehabilitation 
Devices Panel (the 2013 Panel), to discuss the classification of SWT 
devices (Ref. 1). The 2013 Panel reached consensus that SWT devices did 
not fit the statutory definition of a class III device. Section 
513(a)(1)(C) of the FD&C Act provides that a device is class III if (a) 
the device is life supporting or life sustaining, of substantial 
importance in preventing impairment to human health, or presents a 
potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury, and (b) the device 
cannot be classified in class I or II because insufficient information 
exists to determine that general controls or general and special 
controls would provide reasonable assurance of the safety and 
effectiveness of the device. The 2013 Panel agreed that SWT devices are 
not life supporting or life sustaining, or of substantial importance to 
preventing impairment to human health. The 2013 Panel was concerned 
about the potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury resulting 
from the use of SWT devices in certain instances, such as treatments 
around the eye. Moreover, the 2013 Panel concluded that the information 
presented to the panel was sufficient to establish special controls 
that are necessary to provide reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness of SWT. Thus, the consensus of the 2013 Panel was to 
recommend that SWT be reclassified into class II (special controls).
    FDA agrees with the 2013 Panel's recommendation for 
reclassification. The Agency believes, as stated in the proposed order, 
that the risks of SWT devices are sufficiently understood based on 
valid scientific evidence, and a review of the clinical literature 
indicates that few relevant adverse events have been reported for these 
devices. FDA further believes that the risks of SWT devices with the 
special controls identified in this final order will be nominal.
    One of the public comments, received from industry, requested 
removal of the special control requiring clinical data, stating that it 
was unnecessary and there was already sufficient evidence of 
effectiveness. This comment did not cite new data, but requested that 
FDA reconsider the data that was previously presented to the 2013 
Panel. The available scientific evidence on the effectiveness of SWT 
was presented to the 2013 Panel by both FDA and industry, and there was 
panel consensus that the existing data was very limited and that 
clinical data should be required as a special control. When asked to 
consider the benefits of SWT based on the information presented to it 
by FDA and industry, the 2013 Panel consensus was that there may be a 
certain subset of patients who may benefit from SWT; however, the 2013 
Panel had ``very serious concerns involving both the veracity and the 
scientific methodology of the data presented.'' Thus, although the 
limited data reviewed by the Agency and by the 2013 Panel suggest that 
SWT could potentially be effective, particularly for management of 
postoperative pain, the 2013 Panel members indicated a need for 
clinical data demonstrating effectiveness from statistically powered, 
well-controlled studies with quantified outcomes. The 2013 Panel agreed 
with FDA that clinical studies should consider the following 
attributes: Randomization, utilization of sham controls, blinding, 
well-defined cohorts, well-defined treatment parameters, clinically 
relevant and validated measures, adequate power, appropriate and 
defined methods of statistics, predefined hypotheses, and systematic 
collection of adverse events. The 2013 Panel believed that clinical 
studies incorporating these basic design elements should be feasible to 
conduct, and are important in demonstrating an appropriate level of 
effectiveness for specific devices. FDA agrees with the 2013 Panel's 
assessment and has determined that the special controls identified in 
this final order, including clinical performance data, are necessary to 
provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of SWT.
    Two comments from sponsors of currently marketed SWT devices 
supported reclassification, but requested 2 years from the effective 
date of the final order to submit a 510(k), rather than the 60 days FDA 
proposed in the proposed order. The comments suggested that if clinical 
data are necessary, it will be difficult to plan and conduct a clinical 
trial and submit the data within 60 days of the effective date of the 
final order. One comment suggested that it will be beneficial to 
interact with the Agency prior to a clinical trial and submission of 
the data to FDA, and that 60 days may not be adequate to accomplish 
such. FDA would like to encourage interaction with the Agency prior to 
a clinical study and submission of the data to FDA, and therefore 
grants these requests to provide more time for currently legally 
marketed SWT devices to comply with the special controls identified in 
this order. The special controls will be effective on the date of 
publication of this final order. However, FDA does not intend to 
enforce compliance with the special controls with respect to currently 
legally marketed SWT devices until 1 year after the date of publication 
of this final order. Please see Section IV, ``Implementation 
Strategy.'' The Agency also notes that when indicated for adjunctive 
use in the palliative treatment of postoperative pain and edema, SWT 
devices may not be considered significant risk devices, per 21 CFR 
812.3(m), and therefore clinical studies conducted in the United States 
involving SWT devices with those indications for use may not require an 
application for Investigational Device Exemption (U.S. studies 
involving such devices would, however, require approval by an 
institutional review board; see 21 CFR 812.2(b)(1)). Alternatively, SWT 
devices with indications for use different from adjunctive use in the 
palliative treatment of postoperative pain and edema of soft tissue, or 
that specify the types of postoperative pain or edema, may be 
considered significant risk devices. We encourage interaction with FDA 
through the presubmission process to address any questions regarding 
whether such a device is significant risk.
    One industry comment challenged FDA's authority to require new 
510(k)s for SWT devices that have already been legally marketed to 
demonstrate that the SWT devices meet the special controls. FDA has 
considered this comment, and will not require manufacturers of 
currently legally marketed SWT devices to submit a new 510(k) 
notification. However, manufacturers must comply with the special 
controls implemented by this order; if the special controls are not met 
then the device may be considered adulterated under section 
501(f)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 351(f)(1)(B). In order to 
ensure compliance with these special controls, FDA is requiring that 
manufacturers of currently marketed SWT devices submit an amendment to 
their previously cleared 510(k) demonstrating compliance with the 
special controls. Such amendment will be added to the 510(k) file but 
will not serve as a basis for a new substantial equivalence review. An 
amendment to a 510(k) in this context will be used solely to submit 
information demonstrating to

[[Page 61301]]

FDA that an SWT device is in compliance with the special controls.
    As discussed above, the special controls will be effective on the 
date of publication of this final order. However, FDA does not intend 
to enforce compliance with the special controls with respect to 
currently legally marketed SWT devices until 1 year after the date of 
publication. Please see Section IV, ``Implementation Strategy.'' If an 
amendment to a 510(k) that demonstrates compliance with the special 
controls for the device is not submitted as required in Section IV or 
if FDA determines after review of the amendment that the device is not 
in compliance with the special controls, the device may be considered 
adulterated and sale of the device would have to cease.
    In reviewing the proposed order, the comments received, and the 
2013 Panel's recommendations, FDA is also making a few modifications to 
the identification and special controls for SWT devices. The 
identification has been revised from ``intended for the treatment of 
medical conditions except for the treatment of malignancies'' to 
``intended for adjunctive use in the palliative treatment of 
postoperative pain and edema of soft tissue,'' as the latter statement 
more closely captures the current intended uses of existing SWT 
devices. The special control that specifies saline gel test loads has 
been revised to allow for testing in saline gel test load or other 
appropriate models to allow for flexible characterization approaches. 
The special control ``Documented clinical performance testing must 
demonstrate safe and effective use of the device'' has been revised to 
``A detailed summary of the clinical testing pertinent to use of the 
device to demonstrate the effectiveness of the device in its intended 
use.'' This revision clarifies the information that FDA would expect to 
see under this special control. Finally, labeling for SWT devices must 
include output characteristics of the device and recommended treatment 
regimes, including duration of use, in addition to a detailed summary 
of the clinical testing pertinent to the use of the device and a 
summary of the adverse events and complications. This revision 
clarifies the type of information that FDA would expect to see in 
labeling for SWT devices. FDA believes these revisions provide 
additional clarification and flexibility for SWT device manufacturers.

III. The Final Order

    Under section 513(e) of the FD&C Act, FDA is adopting its findings 
as published in the preamble to the proposed order with the 
modifications discussed in Section II of this final order. FDA is 
issuing this final order to reclassify shortwave diathermy (SWD) for 
adjunctive use in the palliative treatment of postoperative pain and 
edema in superficial soft tissue by means other than the generation of 
deep heat within body tissues from class III to class II, rename the 
device ``nonthermal shortwave therapy'' (SWT), and establish special 
controls by revising part 890 (21 CFR part 890). As described in the 
proposed order, FDA is also making a technical correction in the 
regulation for the carrier frequency for SWD and SWT devices from ``13 
megahertz (MHz) to 27.12 MHz'' to ``13.56 MHz or 27.12 MHz.'' The 
identification for Sec.  890.5290 has been revised to provide the name 
change of the device under paragraph (b) and a more accurate 
description of the devices in this classification section. SWT devices 
must comply with the special controls identified in this order (see 
Section IV, ``Implementation Strategy'').
    Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class 
II device from the premarket notification requirements under section 
510(k) of the FD&C Act if FDA determines that premarket notification is 
not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and 
effectiveness of the devices. FDA has determined that premarket 
notification is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness of SWT and, therefore, this device type is not exempt 
from premarket notification requirements.
    Following the effective date of this final order, firms marketing 
SWT devices must comply with the special controls set forth in this 
order (see Section IV, ``Implementation Strategy'').

IV. Implementation Strategy

    The special controls identified in this final order are effective 
October 13, 2015. For models of SWT devices that have not been legally 
marketed prior to October 13, 2015, or models that have been legally 
marketed but are required to submit a new 510(k) under Sec.  
807.81(a)(3) because the device is about to be significantly changed or 
modified, manufacturers must obtain 510(k) clearance, among other 
relevant requirements, and demonstrate compliance with the special 
controls included in this final order, before marketing the new or 
changed device.
    FDA does not intend to enforce compliance with the special controls 
for currently legally marketed SWT devices until October 13, 2016. For 
those manufacturers who wish to continue to offer currently legally 
marketed devices for sale, FDA expects them to submit a 510(k) 
amendment for those devices by October 13, 2016 demonstrating 
compliance with the special controls included in this final order. If a 
510(k) amendment is not submitted by this date for the device or if FDA 
determines that the amendment does not demonstrate compliance with the 
special controls, the device may be considered adulterated under 
section 501(f)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act as of the date of FDA's 
determination of noncompliance or October 13, 2016, whichever is 
sooner, and sale of the device would have to cease.

V. Environmental Impact, No Significant Impact

    The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This final order refers to previously approved collections of 
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information 
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The 
collections of information in 21 CFR part 812 have been approved under 
OMB control number 0910-0078; the collections of information in 21 CFR 
part 807, subpart E, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814, subpart B, 
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0231; and the 
collections of information under 21 CFR part 801 have been approved 
under OMB control number 0910-0485.

VII. Codification of Orders

    Prior to the amendments by FDASIA, section 513(e) of the FD&C Act 
provided for FDA to issue regulations to reclassify devices. Although 
section 513(e) of the FD&C Act as amended requires FDA to issue final 
orders rather than regulations, FDASIA also provides for FDA to revoke 
previously issued regulations by order. FDA will continue to codify 
classifications and reclassifications in the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR). Changes resulting from final orders will appear in 
the CFR as changes to codified classification determinations or as 
newly codified orders. Therefore, under section 513(e)(1)(A)(i) of the 
FD&C Act, as amended by FDASIA, in this final order

[[Page 61302]]

we are revoking the requirements in Sec.  890.5290(b) related to the 
classification of SWT as class III devices and codifying the 
reclassification of SWT into class II (special controls).

VIII. Reference

    FDA has placed the following reference on display in the Division 
of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration, 5630 
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Interested persons may see 
it between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and online at 
http://www.regulations.gov.
    1. FDA's Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel transcript and 
other meeting materials are available on FDA's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/OrthopaedicandRehabilitationDevicesPanel/ucm352525.htm.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 890

    Medical devices, Physical medicine devices.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
890 is amended as follows:

PART 890--PHYSICAL MEDICINE DEVICES

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 890 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.


0
2. Section 890.5290 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) 
and removing paragraph (c).
    The revisions read as follows:


Sec.  890.5290  Shortwave diathermy.

    (a) Shortwave diathermy for use in applying therapeutic deep heat 
for selected medical conditions--(1) Identification. A shortwave 
diathermy for use in applying therapeutic deep heat for selected 
medical conditions is a device that applies to specific areas of the 
body electromagnetic energy in the radiofrequency (RF) bands of 13.56 
megahertz (MHz) or 27.12 MHz and that is intended to generate deep heat 
within body tissues for the treatment of selected medical conditions 
such as relief of pain, muscle spasms, and joint contractures, but not 
for the treatment of malignancies.
* * * * *
    (b) Nonthermal shortwave therapy--(1) Identification. A nonthermal 
shortwave therapy is a prescription device that applies to the body 
pulsed electromagnetic energy in the RF bands of 13.56 MHz or 27.12 MHz 
and that is intended for adjunctive use in the palliative treatment of 
postoperative pain and edema of soft tissue by means other than the 
generation of deep heat within body tissues as described in paragraph 
(a) of this section.
    (2) Classification: Class II (special controls). The device is 
classified as class II. The special controls for this device are:
    (i) Components of the device that come into human contact must be 
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
    (ii) Appropriate analysis/testing must demonstrate that the device 
is electrically safe and electromagnetically compatible in its intended 
use environment.
    (iii) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the 
device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. Non-
clinical performance testing must characterize the output waveform of 
the device and demonstrate that the device meets appropriate output 
performance specifications. The output characteristics and the methods 
used to determine these characteristics, including the following, must 
be determined:
    (A) Peak output power;
    (B) Pulse width;
    (C) Pulse frequency;
    (D) Duty cycle;
    (E) Characteristics of other types of modulation that may be used;
    (F) Average measured output powered into the RF antenna/applicator;
    (G) Specific absorption rates in saline gel test load or other 
appropriate model;
    (H) Characterization of the electrical and magnetic fields in 
saline gel test load or other appropriate model for each RF antenna and 
prescribed RF antenna orientation/position; and
    (I) Characterization of the deposited energy density in saline gel 
test load or other appropriate model.
    (iv) A detailed summary of the clinical testing pertinent to use of 
the device to demonstrate the effectiveness of the device in its 
intended use.
    (v) Labeling must include the following:
    (A) Output characteristics of the device;
    (B) Recommended treatment regimes, including duration of use; and
    (C) A detailed summary of the clinical testing pertinent to the use 
of the device and a summary of the adverse events and complications.
    (vi) Nonthermal shortwave therapy devices marketed prior to the 
effective date of this reclassification must submit an amendment to 
their previously cleared premarket notification (510(k)) demonstrating 
compliance with these special controls.

    Dated: October 6, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-25923 Filed 10-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P



                                                  61298            Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                                  medicated feeds to use under a                          § 558.618    [Amended]                                and redelegated to the Center for
                                                  veterinary feed directive (VFD) and the                 ■ 23. In § 558.618, in paragraph (e)(2)(i),           Veterinary Medicine, and in accordance
                                                  professional supervision of a licensed                  in the ‘‘Sponsor’’ column, add ‘‘016592’’             with 21 CFR 514.116 Notice of
                                                  veterinarian. See § 558.6 of this chapter               after ‘‘000986’’.                                     withdrawal of approval of application,
                                                  for additional requirements.                                                                                  notice is given that approval of NADA
                                                                                                            Dated: October 6, 2015.
                                                     (2) The expiration date of VFDs for                                                                        046–666, and all supplements and
                                                                                                          Bernadette Dunham,
                                                  avilamycin medicated feeds must not                                                                           amendments thereto, is hereby
                                                                                                          Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.             withdrawn, effective October 23, 2015.
                                                  exceed 90 days from the date of
                                                  issuance. VFDs for avilamycin shall not                 [FR Doc. 2015–25918 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am]             Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
                                                  be refilled.                                            BILLING CODE 4164–01–P                                Register, FDA is amending the animal
                                                     (d) Related tolerances. See § 556.68 of                                                                    drug regulations to reflect the voluntary
                                                  this chapter.                                                                                                 withdrawal of approval of this
                                                                                                          DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND                              application.
                                                     (e) Conditions of use in swine—(1)                   HUMAN SERVICES
                                                  Amount. Feed at 73 grams avilamycin                                                                             Dated: October 6, 2015.
                                                  per ton of Type C medicated feed (80                    Food and Drug Administration                          Bernadette Dunham,
                                                  ppm) as the sole ration for 21                                                                                Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
                                                  consecutive days. The veterinarian may                  21 CFR Part 558                                       [FR Doc. 2015–25919 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am]
                                                  direct feeding for up to a total of 42                                                                        BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
                                                                                                          [Docket No. FDA–2015–N–0002]
                                                  consecutive days, based on the clinical
                                                  assessment.                                             New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal
                                                     (2) Indications for use. Weaned pigs                 Feed; Withdrawal of Approval of a New                 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                  less than 14 weeks of age: For the                      Animal Drug Application; Penicillin G                 HUMAN SERVICES
                                                  reduction in incidence and overall                      Procaine
                                                  severity of diarrhea in the presence of                                                                       Food and Drug Administration
                                                  pathogenic Escherichia coli in groups of                AGENCY:     Food and Drug Administration,
                                                  weaned pigs.                                            HHS.                                                  21 CFR Part 890
                                                     (3) Limitations. Feed continuously as                ACTION:   Notification of withdrawal.                 [Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0378]
                                                  the sole ration.                                        SUMMARY:   The Food and Drug
                                                                                                          Administration (FDA) is withdrawing                   Physical Medicine Devices;
                                                  § 558.460   [Amended]
                                                                                                          approval of a new animal drug                         Reclassification of Shortwave
                                                  ■ 21. In § 558.460, revise paragraphs (a)               application (NADA) providing for the                  Diathermy for All Other Uses,
                                                  and (b) to read as follows:                             use of penicillin G procaine in                       Henceforth To Be Known as
                                                                                                          medicated feed of poultry and swine.                  Nonthermal Shortwave Therapy
                                                  § 558.460   Penicillin.
                                                                                                          This action is being taken at the                     AGENCY:    Food and Drug Administration,
                                                    (a) Specifications. Type A medicated                  sponsor’s request because this product
                                                  articles containing 100 or 227 grams                                                                          HHS.
                                                                                                          is no longer manufactured or marketed.                ACTION: Final order; technical
                                                  penicillin procaine G or feed grade
                                                                                                          DATES: Withdrawal of approval is                      correction.
                                                  penicillin procaine per pound.
                                                                                                          effective October 23, 2015.
                                                    (b) Sponsor: See No. 066104 in                                                                              SUMMARY:    The Food and Drug
                                                                                                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                  § 510.600(c) of this chapter.                                                                                 Administration (FDA) is issuing a final
                                                                                                          Sujaya Dessai, Center for Veterinary
                                                  *     *     *     *    *                                Medicine (HFV–212), Food and Drug                     order to reclassify shortwave diathermy
                                                                                                          Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,                    (SWD) for all other uses, a
                                                  § 558.500   [Amended]
                                                                                                          Rockville, MD 20855, 240–402–5761,                    preamendments class III device, into
                                                  ■  22. Amend § 558.500 as follows:                      sujaya.dessai@fda.hhs.gov.                            class II (special controls), and to rename
                                                  ■  a. In paragraphs (e)(1)(ii), (iii), and              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Zoetis
                                                                                                                                                                the device ‘‘nonthermal shortwave
                                                  (iv), in the ‘‘Limitations’’ column,                    Inc., 333 Portage St., Kalamazoo, MI                  therapy’’ (SWT). FDA is also making a
                                                  remove the last sentence and in its place               49007 has requested that FDA withdraw                 technical correction in the regulation for
                                                  add ‘‘Ractopamine as provided by Nos.                   approval of NADA 046–666 that                         the carrier frequency for SWD and SWT
                                                  000986 or 054771; tylosin as provided                   provides for use of Type A medicated                  devices.
                                                  by Nos. 000986 or 016592 in                             articles containing penicillin G procaine             DATES: This order is effective on October
                                                  § 510.600(c) of this chapter.’’.                        to manufacture medicated feeds                        13, 2015. See further discussion in
                                                  ■ b. In paragraphs (e)(2)(iv), (ix), and                administered to poultry and swine. This               Section IV, ‘‘Implementation Strategy.’’
                                                  (xiii), in the ‘‘Limitations’’ column,                  action is being taken at the sponsor’s                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                  remove the last sentence and in its place               request because this product is no                    Michael J. Ryan, Center for Devices and
                                                  add ‘‘Ractopamine as provided by Nos.                   longer manufactured or marketed. Note                 Radiological Health, 10903 New
                                                  000986 or 054771 with monensin as                       this NADA was identified as being                     Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1615,
                                                  provided by No. 000986, and tylosin as                  affected by guidance for industry #213,               Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–
                                                  provided by Nos. 000986 or 016592 in                    ‘‘New Animal Drugs and New Animal                     6283, michael.ryan@fda.hhs.gov.
                                                  § 510.600(c) of this chapter.’’.                        Drug Combination Products                             SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  ■ c. In paragraph (e)(2)(x), in the                     Administered in or on Medicated Feed
                                                  ‘‘Limitations’’ column, to the last                     or Drinking Water of Food-Producing                   I. Background—Regulatory Authorities
                                                  sentence add ‘‘; or ractopamine as                      Animals: Recommendations for Drug                        The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
                                                  provided by No. 054771 with monensin                    Sponsors for Voluntarily Aligning                     Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the
                                                  as provided by No. 000986, tylosin                      Product Use Conditions with GFI #209,’’               Medical Device Amendments of 1976
                                                  provided by No. 016592, and                             December 2013.                                        (the 1976 amendments) (Pub. L. 94–
                                                  melengestrol acetate provided by No.                       Therefore, under authority delegated               295), the Safe Medical Devices Act of
                                                  054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.’’               to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs                 1990 (Pub. L. 101–629), the Food and


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:03 Oct 09, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00022   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\13OCR1.SGM   13OCR1


                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations                                         61299

                                                  Drug Administration Modernization Act                   devices) may be marketed without                      to the issuance of a final order
                                                  of 1997 (Pub. L. 105–115), the Medical                  submission of a premarket approval                    reclassifying a device, the following
                                                  Device User Fee and Modernization Act                   application (PMA) until FDA issues a                  must occur: (1) Publication of a
                                                  of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–250), the Medical                  final order under section 515(b) of the               proposed order in the Federal Register;
                                                  Devices Technical Corrections Act (Pub.                 FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e(b)) requiring                (2) a meeting of a device classification
                                                  L. 108–214), the Food and Drug                          premarket approval.                                   panel described in section 513(b) of the
                                                  Administration Amendments Act of                           On July 9, 2012, FDASIA was enacted.               FD&C Act; and (3) consideration of
                                                  2007 (Pub. L. 110–85), and the Food and                 Section 608(a) of FDASIA amended                      comments to a public docket. FDA
                                                  Drug Administration Safety and                          section 513(e) of the FD&C Act,                       published a proposed order to reclassify
                                                  Innovation Act (FDASIA) (Pub. L. 112–                   changing the mechanism for                            this device in the Federal Register of
                                                  144), among other amendments,                           reclassifying a device from rulemaking                February 20, 2014 (79 FR 9671). FDA
                                                  established a comprehensive system for                  to an administrative order.                           has held a meeting of a device
                                                  the regulation of medical devices                          Section 513(e) of the FD&C Act                     classification panel described in section
                                                  intended for human use. Section 513 of                  provides that FDA may, by                             513(b) of the FD&C Act to discuss
                                                  the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c)                           administrative order, reclassify a device             shortwave diathermy for all other uses,
                                                  established three categories (classes) of               based upon ‘‘new information.’’ FDA                   and therefore, has met this requirement
                                                  devices, reflecting the regulatory                      can initiate a reclassification under                 under section 513(e)(1) of the FD&C Act.
                                                  controls needed to provide reasonable                   section 513(e) or an interested person                As explained further in section II of the
                                                  assurance of their safety and                           may petition FDA to reclassify a                      proposed order, a meeting of a device
                                                  effectiveness. The three categories of                  preamendments device. The term ‘‘new                  classification panel described in section
                                                  devices are class I (general controls),                 information,’’ as used in section 513(e),             513(b) of the FD&C Act took place on
                                                  class II (special controls), and class III              includes information developed as a                   May 21, 2013. FDA received and has
                                                  (premarket approval).                                   result of a reevaluation of the data                  considered several comments on this
                                                     Under section 513(d) of the FD&C Act,                before the Agency when the device was                 proposed order, as discussed in Section
                                                  devices that were in commercial                         originally classified, as well as                     II.
                                                  distribution before the enactment of the                information not presented, not
                                                  1976 amendments, May 28, 1976                           available, or not developed at that time.             II. Public Comments in Response to the
                                                  (generally referred to as preamendments                 (See, e.g., Holland-Rantos Co. v. United              Proposed Order
                                                  devices), are classified after FDA has: (1)             States Department of Health, Education,                  In response to the February 20, 2014,
                                                  Received a recommendation from a                        and Welfare, 587 F.2d 1173, 1174 n.1                  proposed order to reclassify shortwave
                                                  device classification panel (an FDA                     (D.C. Cir. 1978); Upjohn v. Finch, 422                diathermy for all other uses and to
                                                  advisory committee); (2) published the                  F.2d 944 (6th Cir. 1970); Bell v.                     rename the device ‘‘nonthermal
                                                  panel’s recommendation for comment,                     Goddard, 366 F.2d 177 (7th Cir. 1966).)               shortwave therapy,’’ FDA received 40
                                                  along with a proposed regulation                           Reevaluation of the data previously                comments from industry, a patient
                                                  classifying the device; and (3) published               before the Agency is an appropriate                   advocacy group, and consumers of SWT
                                                  a final regulation classifying the device.              basis for subsequent action where the                 devices. Of those, 35 comments were
                                                  FDA has classified most                                 reevaluation is made in light of newly                received from users of specific devices
                                                  preamendments devices under these                       available authority (see Bell, 366 F.2d at            who support the use and availability of
                                                  procedures.                                             181; Ethicon, Inc. v. FDA, 762 F.Supp.                those devices in the United States.
                                                     Devices that were not in commercial                  382, 388–391 (D.D.C. 1991); or, in light              Several of these comments also
                                                  distribution prior to May 28, 1976                      of changes in ‘‘medical science,’’                    supported reclassification into class II.
                                                  (generally referred to as                               Upjohn, 422 F.2d at 951). Whether data                This final order reclassifies into class II
                                                  ‘‘postamendments devices’’), are                        before the Agency are old or new data,                SWT devices intended for adjunctive
                                                  automatically classified by section                     the ‘‘new information’’ to support                    use in the palliative treatment of
                                                  513(f) of the FD&C Act into class III                   reclassification under section 513(e)                 postoperative pain and edema of soft
                                                  without any FDA rulemaking process.                     must be ‘‘valid scientific evidence’’ as              tissue by means other than the
                                                  Those devices remain in class III and                   defined in section 513(a)(3) of the FD&C              generation of deep heat within body
                                                  require premarket approval unless, and                  Act and 21 CFR 860.7(c)(2). (See, e.g.,               tissues and establishes special controls
                                                  until, the device is reclassified into class            Gen. Medical Co. v. FDA, 770 F.2d 214                 that are intended to mitigate risks to
                                                  I or II or FDA issues an order finding the              (D.C. Cir. 1985); Contact Lens Mfrs.                  health of SWT devices in order to
                                                  device to be substantially equivalent, in               Ass’n v. FDA, 766 F.2d 592 (D.C. Cir.                 provide a reasonable assurance of their
                                                  accordance with section 513(i) of the                   1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1062                    safety and effectiveness. These special
                                                  FD&C Act, to a predicate device that                    (1986).)                                              controls are meant to protect patients
                                                  does not require premarket approval.                       FDA relies upon ‘‘valid scientific                 from unsafe or ineffective SWT devices.
                                                  The Agency determines whether new                       evidence’’ in the classification process                 Six of the comments from users also
                                                  devices are substantially equivalent to                 to determine the level of regulation for              requested that the prescription use
                                                  predicate devices by means of                           devices. To be considered in the                      restriction be removed from the
                                                  premarket notification procedures in                    reclassification process, the ‘‘valid                 proposed regulation so that SWT
                                                  section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21                      scientific evidence’’ upon which the                  devices could be available over-the-
                                                  U.S.C. 360(k)) and 21 CFR part 807.                     Agency relies must be publicly                        counter (OTC). This final order applies
                                                     A preamendments device that has                      available. Publicly available information             only to SWT devices for the indications
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  been classified into class III and devices              excludes trade secret and/or                          and uses that have been previously
                                                  found substantially equivalent by means                 confidential commercial information,                  cleared for marketing. To date, FDA has
                                                  of premarket notification (510(k))                      e.g., the contents of a pending PMA.                  not cleared an SWT device for OTC use
                                                  procedures to such a preamendments                      (See section 520(c) of the FD&C Act (21               and, as a result, has limited the
                                                  device or to a device within that type                  U.S.C. 360j(c)).)                                     reclassification in this final order to
                                                  (both the preamendments and                                Section 513(e)(1) of the FD&C Act sets             prescription use devices. However, if
                                                  substantially equivalent devices are                    forth the process for issuing a final                 FDA receives a marketing application in
                                                  referred to as preamendments class III                  reclassification order. Specifically, prior           the future for an SWT device indicated


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:03 Oct 09, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00023   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\13OCR1.SGM   13OCR1


                                                  61300            Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                                  for OTC use, FDA would make its                         available scientific evidence on the                  therefore grants these requests to
                                                  classification decision regarding such                  effectiveness of SWT was presented to                 provide more time for currently legally
                                                  use at that time.                                       the 2013 Panel by both FDA and                        marketed SWT devices to comply with
                                                     One public comment FDA received                      industry, and there was panel consensus               the special controls identified in this
                                                  requested that SWT devices remain                       that the existing data was very limited               order. The special controls will be
                                                  classified in class III, and that FDA call              and that clinical data should be required             effective on the date of publication of
                                                  for PMAs. FDA disagrees that SWT                        as a special control. When asked to                   this final order. However, FDA does not
                                                  devices should remain in class III and                  consider the benefits of SWT based on                 intend to enforce compliance with the
                                                  require PMA approval. On May 21,                        the information presented to it by FDA                special controls with respect to
                                                  2013, FDA held a meeting of the                         and industry, the 2013 Panel consensus                currently legally marketed SWT devices
                                                  Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Devices                   was that there may be a certain subset                until 1 year after the date of publication
                                                  Panel (the 2013 Panel), to discuss the                  of patients who may benefit from SWT;                 of this final order. Please see Section IV,
                                                  classification of SWT devices (Ref. 1).                 however, the 2013 Panel had ‘‘very                    ‘‘Implementation Strategy.’’ The Agency
                                                  The 2013 Panel reached consensus that                   serious concerns involving both the                   also notes that when indicated for
                                                  SWT devices did not fit the statutory                   veracity and the scientific methodology               adjunctive use in the palliative
                                                  definition of a class III device. Section               of the data presented.’’ Thus, although               treatment of postoperative pain and
                                                  513(a)(1)(C) of the FD&C Act provides                   the limited data reviewed by the Agency               edema, SWT devices may not be
                                                  that a device is class III if (a) the device            and by the 2013 Panel suggest that SWT
                                                  is life supporting or life sustaining, of                                                                     considered significant risk devices, per
                                                                                                          could potentially be effective,                       21 CFR 812.3(m), and therefore clinical
                                                  substantial importance in preventing                    particularly for management of
                                                  impairment to human health, or                                                                                studies conducted in the United States
                                                                                                          postoperative pain, the 2013 Panel                    involving SWT devices with those
                                                  presents a potential unreasonable risk of               members indicated a need for clinical
                                                  illness or injury, and (b) the device                                                                         indications for use may not require an
                                                                                                          data demonstrating effectiveness from                 application for Investigational Device
                                                  cannot be classified in class I or II                   statistically powered, well-controlled
                                                  because insufficient information exists                                                                       Exemption (U.S. studies involving such
                                                                                                          studies with quantified outcomes. The
                                                  to determine that general controls or                                                                         devices would, however, require
                                                                                                          2013 Panel agreed with FDA that
                                                  general and special controls would                                                                            approval by an institutional review
                                                                                                          clinical studies should consider the
                                                  provide reasonable assurance of the                                                                           board; see 21 CFR 812.2(b)(1)).
                                                                                                          following attributes: Randomization,
                                                  safety and effectiveness of the device.                                                                       Alternatively, SWT devices with
                                                                                                          utilization of sham controls, blinding,
                                                  The 2013 Panel agreed that SWT                                                                                indications for use different from
                                                                                                          well-defined cohorts, well-defined
                                                  devices are not life supporting or life                                                                       adjunctive use in the palliative
                                                                                                          treatment parameters, clinically relevant
                                                  sustaining, or of substantial importance                                                                      treatment of postoperative pain and
                                                                                                          and validated measures, adequate
                                                  to preventing impairment to human                                                                             edema of soft tissue, or that specify the
                                                                                                          power, appropriate and defined
                                                  health. The 2013 Panel was concerned                                                                          types of postoperative pain or edema,
                                                                                                          methods of statistics, predefined
                                                  about the potential unreasonable risk of                                                                      may be considered significant risk
                                                                                                          hypotheses, and systematic collection of
                                                  illness or injury resulting from the use                adverse events. The 2013 Panel believed               devices. We encourage interaction with
                                                  of SWT devices in certain instances,                    that clinical studies incorporating these             FDA through the presubmission process
                                                  such as treatments around the eye.                      basic design elements should be feasible              to address any questions regarding
                                                  Moreover, the 2013 Panel concluded                      to conduct, and are important in                      whether such a device is significant
                                                  that the information presented to the                                                                         risk.
                                                                                                          demonstrating an appropriate level of
                                                  panel was sufficient to establish special                                                                        One industry comment challenged
                                                                                                          effectiveness for specific devices. FDA
                                                  controls that are necessary to provide                                                                        FDA’s authority to require new 510(k)s
                                                                                                          agrees with the 2013 Panel’s assessment
                                                  reasonable assurance of safety and                                                                            for SWT devices that have already been
                                                                                                          and has determined that the special
                                                  effectiveness of SWT. Thus, the                                                                               legally marketed to demonstrate that the
                                                                                                          controls identified in this final order,
                                                  consensus of the 2013 Panel was to
                                                                                                          including clinical performance data, are              SWT devices meet the special controls.
                                                  recommend that SWT be reclassified
                                                                                                          necessary to provide a reasonable                     FDA has considered this comment, and
                                                  into class II (special controls).
                                                     FDA agrees with the 2013 Panel’s                     assurance of safety and effectiveness of              will not require manufacturers of
                                                  recommendation for reclassification.                    SWT.                                                  currently legally marketed SWT devices
                                                  The Agency believes, as stated in the                      Two comments from sponsors of                      to submit a new 510(k) notification.
                                                  proposed order, that the risks of SWT                   currently marketed SWT devices                        However, manufacturers must comply
                                                  devices are sufficiently understood                     supported reclassification, but requested             with the special controls implemented
                                                  based on valid scientific evidence, and                 2 years from the effective date of the                by this order; if the special controls are
                                                  a review of the clinical literature                     final order to submit a 510(k), rather                not met then the device may be
                                                  indicates that few relevant adverse                     than the 60 days FDA proposed in the                  considered adulterated under section
                                                  events have been reported for these                     proposed order. The comments                          501(f)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
                                                  devices. FDA further believes that the                  suggested that if clinical data are                   351(f)(1)(B). In order to ensure
                                                  risks of SWT devices with the special                   necessary, it will be difficult to plan and           compliance with these special controls,
                                                  controls identified in this final order                 conduct a clinical trial and submit the               FDA is requiring that manufacturers of
                                                  will be nominal.                                        data within 60 days of the effective date             currently marketed SWT devices submit
                                                     One of the public comments, received                 of the final order. One comment                       an amendment to their previously
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  from industry, requested removal of the                 suggested that it will be beneficial to               cleared 510(k) demonstrating
                                                  special control requiring clinical data,                interact with the Agency prior to a                   compliance with the special controls.
                                                  stating that it was unnecessary and there               clinical trial and submission of the data             Such amendment will be added to the
                                                  was already sufficient evidence of                      to FDA, and that 60 days may not be                   510(k) file but will not serve as a basis
                                                  effectiveness. This comment did not cite                adequate to accomplish such. FDA                      for a new substantial equivalence
                                                  new data, but requested that FDA                        would like to encourage interaction                   review. An amendment to a 510(k) in
                                                  reconsider the data that was previously                 with the Agency prior to a clinical study             this context will be used solely to
                                                  presented to the 2013 Panel. The                        and submission of the data to FDA, and                submit information demonstrating to


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:03 Oct 09, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00024   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\13OCR1.SGM   13OCR1


                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations                                        61301

                                                  FDA that an SWT device is in                            published in the preamble to the                      offer currently legally marketed devices
                                                  compliance with the special controls.                   proposed order with the modifications                 for sale, FDA expects them to submit a
                                                     As discussed above, the special                      discussed in Section II of this final                 510(k) amendment for those devices by
                                                  controls will be effective on the date of               order. FDA is issuing this final order to             October 13, 2016 demonstrating
                                                  publication of this final order. However,               reclassify shortwave diathermy (SWD)                  compliance with the special controls
                                                  FDA does not intend to enforce                          for adjunctive use in the palliative                  included in this final order. If a 510(k)
                                                  compliance with the special controls                    treatment of postoperative pain and                   amendment is not submitted by this
                                                  with respect to currently legally                       edema in superficial soft tissue by                   date for the device or if FDA determines
                                                  marketed SWT devices until 1 year after                 means other than the generation of deep               that the amendment does not
                                                  the date of publication. Please see                     heat within body tissues from class III               demonstrate compliance with the
                                                  Section IV, ‘‘Implementation Strategy.’’                to class II, rename the device                        special controls, the device may be
                                                  If an amendment to a 510(k) that                        ‘‘nonthermal shortwave therapy’’                      considered adulterated under section
                                                  demonstrates compliance with the                        (SWT), and establish special controls by              501(f)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act as of the
                                                  special controls for the device is not                  revising part 890 (21 CFR part 890). As               date of FDA’s determination of
                                                  submitted as required in Section IV or                  described in the proposed order, FDA is               noncompliance or October 13, 2016,
                                                  if FDA determines after review of the                   also making a technical correction in the             whichever is sooner, and sale of the
                                                  amendment that the device is not in                     regulation for the carrier frequency for              device would have to cease.
                                                  compliance with the special controls,                   SWD and SWT devices from ‘‘13
                                                  the device may be considered                                                                                  V. Environmental Impact, No
                                                                                                          megahertz (MHz) to 27.12 MHz’’ to
                                                  adulterated and sale of the device would                                                                      Significant Impact
                                                                                                          ‘‘13.56 MHz or 27.12 MHz.’’ The
                                                  have to cease.                                          identification for § 890.5290 has been                   The Agency has determined under 21
                                                     In reviewing the proposed order, the                 revised to provide the name change of                 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
                                                  comments received, and the 2013                         the device under paragraph (b) and a                  that does not individually or
                                                  Panel’s recommendations, FDA is also                    more accurate description of the devices              cumulatively have a significant effect on
                                                  making a few modifications to the                       in this classification section. SWT                   the human environment. Therefore,
                                                  identification and special controls for                 devices must comply with the special                  neither an environmental assessment
                                                  SWT devices. The identification has                     controls identified in this order (see                nor an environmental impact statement
                                                  been revised from ‘‘intended for the                    Section IV, ‘‘Implementation Strategy’’).             is required.
                                                  treatment of medical conditions except                     Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act                     VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
                                                  for the treatment of malignancies’’ to                  provides that FDA may exempt a class
                                                  ‘‘intended for adjunctive use in the                    II device from the premarket notification               This final order refers to previously
                                                  palliative treatment of postoperative                   requirements under section 510(k) of the              approved collections of information
                                                  pain and edema of soft tissue,’’ as the                 FD&C Act if FDA determines that                       found in FDA regulations. These
                                                  latter statement more closely captures                  premarket notification is not necessary               collections of information are subject to
                                                  the current intended uses of existing                   to provide reasonable assurance of the                review by the Office of Management and
                                                  SWT devices. The special control that                   safety and effectiveness of the devices.              Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
                                                  specifies saline gel test loads has been                FDA has determined that premarket                     Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
                                                  revised to allow for testing in saline gel              notification is necessary to provide                  3520). The collections of information in
                                                  test load or other appropriate models to                reasonable assurance of safety and                    21 CFR part 812 have been approved
                                                  allow for flexible characterization                     effectiveness of SWT and, therefore, this             under OMB control number 0910–0078;
                                                  approaches. The special control                         device type is not exempt from                        the collections of information in 21 CFR
                                                  ‘‘Documented clinical performance                       premarket notification requirements.                  part 807, subpart E, have been approved
                                                  testing must demonstrate safe and                          Following the effective date of this               under OMB control number 0910–0120;
                                                  effective use of the device’’ has been                  final order, firms marketing SWT                      the collections of information in 21 CFR
                                                  revised to ‘‘A detailed summary of the                  devices must comply with the special                  part 814, subpart B, have been approved
                                                  clinical testing pertinent to use of the                controls set forth in this order (see                 under OMB control number 0910–0231;
                                                  device to demonstrate the effectiveness                 Section IV, ‘‘Implementation Strategy’’).             and the collections of information under
                                                  of the device in its intended use.’’ This                                                                     21 CFR part 801 have been approved
                                                  revision clarifies the information that                 IV. Implementation Strategy                           under OMB control number 0910–0485.
                                                  FDA would expect to see under this                         The special controls identified in this
                                                                                                          final order are effective October 13,                 VII. Codification of Orders
                                                  special control. Finally, labeling for
                                                  SWT devices must include output                         2015. For models of SWT devices that                     Prior to the amendments by FDASIA,
                                                  characteristics of the device and                       have not been legally marketed prior to               section 513(e) of the FD&C Act provided
                                                  recommended treatment regimes,                          October 13, 2015, or models that have                 for FDA to issue regulations to reclassify
                                                  including duration of use, in addition to               been legally marketed but are required                devices. Although section 513(e) of the
                                                  a detailed summary of the clinical                      to submit a new 510(k) under                          FD&C Act as amended requires FDA to
                                                  testing pertinent to the use of the device              § 807.81(a)(3) because the device is                  issue final orders rather than
                                                  and a summary of the adverse events                     about to be significantly changed or                  regulations, FDASIA also provides for
                                                  and complications. This revision                        modified, manufacturers must obtain                   FDA to revoke previously issued
                                                  clarifies the type of information that                  510(k) clearance, among other relevant                regulations by order. FDA will continue
                                                  FDA would expect to see in labeling for                 requirements, and demonstrate                         to codify classifications and
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  SWT devices. FDA believes these                         compliance with the special controls                  reclassifications in the Code of Federal
                                                  revisions provide additional                            included in this final order, before                  Regulations (CFR). Changes resulting
                                                  clarification and flexibility for SWT                   marketing the new or changed device.                  from final orders will appear in the CFR
                                                  device manufacturers.                                      FDA does not intend to enforce                     as changes to codified classification
                                                                                                          compliance with the special controls for              determinations or as newly codified
                                                  III. The Final Order                                    currently legally marketed SWT devices                orders. Therefore, under section
                                                     Under section 513(e) of the FD&C Act,                until October 13, 2016. For those                     513(e)(1)(A)(i) of the FD&C Act, as
                                                  FDA is adopting its findings as                         manufacturers who wish to continue to                 amended by FDASIA, in this final order


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:03 Oct 09, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00025   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\13OCR1.SGM   13OCR1


                                                  61302              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                                  we are revoking the requirements in                      shortwave therapy is a prescription                   date of this reclassification must submit
                                                  § 890.5290(b) related to the                             device that applies to the body pulsed                an amendment to their previously
                                                  classification of SWT as class III devices               electromagnetic energy in the RF bands                cleared premarket notification (510(k))
                                                  and codifying the reclassification of                    of 13.56 MHz or 27.12 MHz and that is                 demonstrating compliance with these
                                                  SWT into class II (special controls).                    intended for adjunctive use in the                    special controls.
                                                  VIII. Reference                                          palliative treatment of postoperative                   Dated: October 6, 2015.
                                                                                                           pain and edema of soft tissue by means                Leslie Kux,
                                                    FDA has placed the following                           other than the generation of deep heat
                                                  reference on display in the Division of                                                                        Associate Commissioner for Policy.
                                                                                                           within body tissues as described in
                                                  Dockets Management (HFA–305) Food                        paragraph (a) of this section.                        [FR Doc. 2015–25923 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am]
                                                  and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers                       (2) Classification: Class II (special              BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
                                                  Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.                     controls). The device is classified as
                                                  Interested persons may see it between 9                  class II. The special controls for this
                                                  a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through                          device are:                                           DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                                                  Friday, and online at http://                               (i) Components of the device that
                                                  www.regulations.gov.                                     come into human contact must be                       Federal Highway Administration
                                                    1. FDA’s Orthopedic and                                demonstrated to be biocompatible.
                                                  Rehabilitation Devices Panel transcript                     (ii) Appropriate analysis/testing must             23 CFR Part 625
                                                  and other meeting materials are                          demonstrate that the device is                        [Docket No. FHWA–2015–0003]
                                                  available on FDA’s Web site at http://                   electrically safe and electromagnetically
                                                  www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/                          compatible in its intended use                        RIN 2125–AF67
                                                  CommitteesMeetingMaterials/                              environment.
                                                  MedicalDevices/                                                                                                Design Standards for Highways
                                                                                                              (iii) Non-clinical performance testing
                                                  MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/                         must demonstrate that the device                      AGENCY:  Federal Highway
                                                  Orthopaedicand                                           performs as intended under anticipated                Administration (FHWA), Department of
                                                  RehabilitationDevicesPanel/                              conditions of use. Non-clinical                       Transportation (DOT).
                                                  ucm352525.htm.                                           performance testing must characterize                 ACTION: Final rule.
                                                  List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 890                      the output waveform of the device and
                                                                                                           demonstrate that the device meets                     SUMMARY:    This rule updates the
                                                    Medical devices, Physical medicine                     appropriate output performance                        regulations governing the required
                                                  devices.                                                 specifications. The output                            design standards to be utilized on
                                                    Therefore, under the Federal Food,                     characteristics and the methods used to               Federal-aid highway program (FAHP)
                                                  Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under                         determine these characteristics,                      projects. In issuing the final rule, FHWA
                                                  authority delegated to the Commissioner                  including the following, must be                      incorporates by reference the latest
                                                  of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 890 is                    determined:                                           versions of design standards and
                                                  amended as follows:                                         (A) Peak output power;                             standard specifications previously
                                                                                                              (B) Pulse width;                                   adopted and incorporated by reference,
                                                  PART 890—PHYSICAL MEDICINE                                  (C) Pulse frequency;                               and removes the corresponding
                                                  DEVICES                                                     (D) Duty cycle;                                    outdated or superseded versions of
                                                  ■ 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR                      (E) Characteristics of other types of              these standards and specifications. This
                                                  part 890 continues to read as follows:                   modulation that may be used;                          rule also makes technical changes to the
                                                                                                              (F) Average measured output powered                regulatory text consistent with updated
                                                    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,             into the RF antenna/applicator;
                                                  360j, 371.
                                                                                                                                                                 Federal Register procedures.
                                                                                                              (G) Specific absorption rates in saline            DATES: This final rule is effective
                                                  ■ 2. Section 890.5290 is amended by                      gel test load or other appropriate model;             November 12, 2015. The incorporation
                                                  revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and                      (H) Characterization of the electrical
                                                                                                                                                                 by reference of certain publications
                                                  removing paragraph (c).                                  and magnetic fields in saline gel test
                                                                                                                                                                 listed in the rule is approved by the
                                                    The revisions read as follows:                         load or other appropriate model for each
                                                                                                                                                                 Director of the Federal Register as of
                                                                                                           RF antenna and prescribed RF antenna
                                                  § 890.5290       Shortwave diathermy.                                                                          November 12, 2015.
                                                                                                           orientation/position; and
                                                     (a) Shortwave diathermy for use in                       (I) Characterization of the deposited              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
                                                  applying therapeutic deep heat for                       energy density in saline gel test load or             Michael Matzke, Office of Program
                                                  selected medical conditions—(1)                          other appropriate model.                              Administration (HIPA–20), (202) 366–
                                                  Identification. A shortwave diathermy                       (iv) A detailed summary of the                     4658, or via email at
                                                  for use in applying therapeutic deep                     clinical testing pertinent to use of the              michael.matzke@dot.gov, or Mr. Robert
                                                  heat for selected medical conditions is                  device to demonstrate the effectiveness               Black, Office of the Chief Counsel
                                                  a device that applies to specific areas of               of the device in its intended use.                    (HCC–30), (202) 366–1373, or via email
                                                  the body electromagnetic energy in the                      (v) Labeling must include the                      at robert.black@dot.gov. Office hours are
                                                  radiofrequency (RF) bands of 13.56                       following:                                            from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., e.t., Monday
                                                  megahertz (MHz) or 27.12 MHz and that                       (A) Output characteristics of the                  through Friday, except Federal holidays.
                                                  is intended to generate deep heat within                 device;                                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  body tissues for the treatment of                           (B) Recommended treatment regimes,
                                                  selected medical conditions such as                                                                            Electronic Access and Filing
                                                                                                           including duration of use; and
                                                  relief of pain, muscle spasms, and joint                    (C) A detailed summary of the clinical               This document, the notice of
                                                  contractures, but not for the treatment of               testing pertinent to the use of the device            proposed rulemaking (NPRM), and all
                                                  malignancies.                                            and a summary of the adverse events                   comments received may be viewed
                                                  *      *    *     *    *                                 and complications.                                    online through the Federal eRulemaking
                                                     (b) Nonthermal shortwave therapy—                        (vi) Nonthermal shortwave therapy                  portal at: http://www.regulations.gov.
                                                  (1) Identification. A nonthermal                         devices marketed prior to the effective               The Web site is available 24 hours each


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014    17:03 Oct 09, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00026   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\13OCR1.SGM   13OCR1



Document Created: 2018-02-27 08:47:42
Document Modified: 2018-02-27 08:47:42
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal order; technical correction.
DatesThis order is effective on October 13, 2015. See further discussion in Section IV, ``Implementation Strategy.''
ContactMichael J. Ryan, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1615, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-6283, [email protected]
FR Citation80 FR 61298 
CFR AssociatedMedical Devices and Physical Medicine Devices

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR