80 FR 61361 - Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Turkey: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Calendar Year 2013 and Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, in Part
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 197 (October 13, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 197 (October 13, 2015)
| Page Range | 61361-61362 | |
| FR Document | 2015-25989 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 197 (Tuesday, October 13, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 61361-61362] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-25989] [[Page 61361]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-489-502] Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Turkey: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Calendar Year 2013 and Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, in Part AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) has completed the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes (steel pipes and tubes) from Turkey for the January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013, period of review (POR) in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). This review covers four exporters/ producers, one of which is being individually examined as a mandatory respondent. In these final results, the Department has made changes to the net subsidy rate determined for the sole mandatory respondent, Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (BMB), Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. (Istikbal), and Borusan Lojistik Dagitim Pepolama Tasimacilik ve Tic A.S. (Borusan Lojistik) (collectively, the Borusan Companies). Further, in these final results, we have continued to apply the net subsidy rate calculated for the Borusan Companies to the following three respondents not subject to individual review: Tosyali dis Ticaret A.S. (Tosyali) and Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. (Toscelik Profil), (collectively, the Toscelik Companies), Umran Celik Born Sanayii A.S. (also known as Umran Steel Pipe Inc.) (Umran), and Guven Steel Pipe (also known as Guven Celik Born San. Ve Tic. Ltd.) (Guven). Additionally, in these final results the Department is rescinding the review of two companies Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan AS) and Erbosan Erciyas Pipe Industry and Trade Co. Kayseri Free Zone Branch (Erbosan FZB), (collectively, the Erbosan Companies) and the Yucel Group and all affiliates including Yucel Boru ye Profil Endustrisi A.S, Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ye Pazarlama A.S, and Cayirova Born Sanayi ye Ticaret A.S.) (collectively, the Yucel Companies) that timely certified that they had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Conniff at 202-482-1009, or Jolanta Lawska at 202-482-8362, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. Background On March 7, 1986, the Department published in the Federal Register the CVD order on steel pipes and tubes from Turkey.\1\ On April 8, 2015, the Department published in the Federal Register the Preliminary Results for this review.\2\ In the Preliminary Results, we invited interested parties to submit case and rebuttal briefs commenting on the preliminary results and to request a hearing.\3\ On May 8, 2015, we received case briefs from the Borusan Companies, the Government of Turkey (GOT), and the Toscelik Companies. We received no rebuttal briefs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Countervailing Duty Order: Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey, 51 FR 7984 (March 7, 1986). \2\ See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Turkey: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Intent To Rescind in Part; Calendar Year 2013, 80 FR 18809 (April 8, 2015) (Preliminary Results). \3\ Id., 80 FR at 18810. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On April 8, 2015 the Borusan Companies requested a hearing. On June 1, 2015, the Borusan Companies withdrew their request for a hearing. On June 16, 2015, the Department extended the deadline for the final results of this administrative review until October 5, 2015.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum from Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations through Erin Begnal, Director, Office III, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, dated June 16, 2015 regarding Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Turkey; 2013, ``Extension of Time Limit for Final Results'' (June 16, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of Order The products covered by this order are certain welded carbon steel pipe and tube with an outside diameter of 0.375 inch or more, but not over 16 inches, of any wall thickness (pipe and tube) from Turkey. These products are currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings as 7306.30.10, 7306.30.50, and 7306.90.10. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive. Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable during the POR, we determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that confers a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific. See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. For a complete description of the methodology, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Final Results of Countervailing Duty (CVD) Administrative Review: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Turkey,'' dated concurrently with these final results (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case briefs of the Borusan Companies, the GOT, and the Toscelik Companies are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Rescission of the 2013 Administrative Review, in Part The Department did not receive any information from interested parties or U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that was contrary to the claims of the Erbosan Companies and the Yucel Companies of no sales, shipments, or entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR after we indicated our intent to rescind the administrative review. Accordingly, based on record evidence, we determine that the Erbosan Companies and the Yucel Companies did not ship subject [[Page 61362]] merchandise to the United States during the POR. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and consistent with our practice,\6\ we are rescinding the review for the Erbosan Companies and the Yucel Companies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See, e.g., Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 79 FR 2635 (January 15, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an individual subsidy rate for the mandatory respondent, the Borusan Companies. Because the Borusan Companies are the sole mandatory respondent, we assigned to those companies not selected for individual review, the rate calculated for the Borusan Companies. As a result of this review, we determine the listed net subsidy rates for January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Company Net subsidy rate (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Borusan Group, Borusan Holding, A.S. 0.91 ad valorem. (Borusan Holding), Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Borusan), Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. (Istikbal), and Borusan Lojistik Dagitim Pepolama Tasimacilik ve Tic A.S. (Borusan Lojistik) (collectively, the Borusan Companies). Umran Celik Born Sanayii A.S. (also 0.91 ad valorem. known as Umran Steel Pipe Inc.) (Umran). Guven Steel Pipe (also known as Guven 0.91 ad valorem. Celik Born San. Ve Tic. Ltd.) (Guven). Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. 0.91 ad valorem. (Toscelik Profil), Toscelik Metal Ticaret AS., and Tosyali Dis Ticaret AS. (Tosyali) (collectively, the Toscelik Companies). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rates/Cash Deposits In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), the Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by respondents listed above entered, or withdrawn form warehouse, for consumption on or after January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. For the Erbosan Companies and Yucel Companies, the rescinded companies, countervailing duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the rates for the cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice. Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the Department also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated CVDs, in the amounts shown above for each of the respective companies shown above, on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits at the most-recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation which is subject to sanction. These final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: October 5, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I. Summary II. Rescission of the 2013 Administrative Review, in Part III. Subsidies Valuation Information A. Allocation Period B. Attribution of Subsidies C. Benchmark Interest Rates IV. Analysis of Programs A. Programs Determined To Be Countervailable 1. Deduction from Taxable Income for Export Revenue 2. Short-Term Pre-Shipment Rediscount Program 3. Investment Encouragement Program (IEP): Customs Duty Exemptions 4. Provision of HRS for Less Than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) B. Programs Determined Not To Confer Countervailable Benefits 1. Inward Processing Certificate Exemption C. Programs Determined Not to Be Used V. Non-Selected Rate VI. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether the Department Erred by Finding That Prices of HRS in Turkey Are Significantly Distorted Comment 2: Calculating the Share of HRS Accounted for by Erdemir and Isdemir Comment 3: Data Sources Used in the Calculation of the Tier-Two Benchmark Price Comment 4: Calculating the Tier-Two Benchmark Price Concerning Import Duties and VAT Comment 5: Calculating the Tier-Two Benchmark Price Concerning Freight Comment 6: Whether the Method the Department Used To Weight Average the Tier-Two Benchmark Is Flawed Comment 7: Whether Erdemir and Isdemir Are Public Bodies Comment 8: The Department's Specificity Determination Comment 9: Whether the Department Erred in Not Selecting the Toscelik Companies as a Mandatory Respondent VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-25989 Filed 10-9-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices 61361
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Methodology
Conniff at 202–482–1009, or Jolanta The Department conducted this
International Trade Administration Lawska at 202–482–8362, AD/CVD review in accordance with section
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act. For each of the
[C–489–502] Compliance, International Trade subsidy programs found countervailable
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes Administration, U.S. Department of during the POR, we determine that there
and Tubes From Turkey: Final Results Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. financial contribution that confers a
Review; Calendar Year 2013 and Background benefit to the recipient, and that the
Rescission of Countervailing Duty subsidy is specific. See sections
Administrative Review, in Part On March 7, 1986, the Department 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
published in the Federal Register the financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, CVD order on steel pipes and tubes from of the Act regarding benefit; and section
International Trade Administration, Turkey.1 On April 8, 2015, the 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
Department of Commerce. Department published in the Federal For a complete description of the
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Register the Preliminary Results for this methodology, see the Issues and
(the Department) has completed the review.2 In the Preliminary Results, we Decision Memorandum.5
administrative review of the invited interested parties to submit case
countervailing duty (CVD) order on Analysis of Comments Received
and rebuttal briefs commenting on the
circular welded carbon steel pipes and preliminary results and to request a All issues raised in the case briefs of
tubes (steel pipes and tubes) from hearing.3 On May 8, 2015, we received the Borusan Companies, the GOT, and
Turkey for the January 1, 2013, through case briefs from the Borusan Companies, the Toscelik Companies are addressed
December 31, 2013, period of review the Government of Turkey (GOT), and in the Issues and Decision
(POR) in accordance with section 751(a) the Toscelik Companies. We received no Memorandum. A list of the issues raised
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended rebuttal briefs. and to which we responded in the
(the Act). This review covers four Issues and Decision Memorandum, is
On April 8, 2015 the Borusan
exporters/producers, one of which is attached to this notice as an Appendix.
Companies requested a hearing. On June
being individually examined as a The Issues and Decision Memorandum
1, 2015, the Borusan Companies
mandatory respondent. In these final is a public document and is on file
withdrew their request for a hearing.
results, the Department has made electronically via Enforcement and
changes to the net subsidy rate On June 16, 2015, the Department Compliance’s Antidumping and
determined for the sole mandatory extended the deadline for the final Countervailing Duty Centralized
respondent, Borusan Mannesmann Boru results of this administrative review Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (BMB), Borusan until October 5, 2015.4 ACCESS is available to registered users
Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. (Istikbal), and Scope of Order at http://access.trade.gov, and is
Borusan Lojistik Dagitim Pepolama available to all parties in the Central
Tasimacilik ve Tic A.S. (Borusan The products covered by this order Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Lojistik) (collectively, the Borusan are certain welded carbon steel pipe and Commerce building. In addition, a
Companies). Further, in these final tube with an outside diameter of 0.375 complete version of the Issues and
results, we have continued to apply the inch or more, but not over 16 inches, of Decision Memorandum can be accessed
net subsidy rate calculated for the any wall thickness (pipe and tube) from directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/
Borusan Companies to the following Turkey. These products are currently frn/index.html. The signed Issues and
three respondents not subject to classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Decision Memorandum and the
individual review: Tosyali dis Ticaret Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) electronic versions of the Issues and
A.S. (Tosyali) and Toscelik Profil ve Sac subheadings as 7306.30.10, 7306.30.50, Decision Memorandum are identical in
Endustrisi A.S. (Toscelik Profil), and 7306.90.10. Although the HTSUS content.
(collectively, the Toscelik Companies), subheadings are provided for Rescission of the 2013 Administrative
Umran Celik Born Sanayii A.S. (also convenience and customs purposes, the Review, in Part
known as Umran Steel Pipe Inc.) written description of the merchandise
is dispositive. The Department did not receive any
(Umran), and Guven Steel Pipe (also
information from interested parties or
known as Guven Celik Born San. Ve Tic.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Ltd.) (Guven). Additionally, in these 1 See Countervailing Duty Order: Certain Welded
Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey, (CBP) that was contrary to the claims of
final results the Department is
51 FR 7984 (March 7, 1986). the Erbosan Companies and the Yucel
rescinding the review of two companies 2 See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and
Companies of no sales, shipments, or
Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret Tubes from Turkey: Preliminary Results of entries of subject merchandise to the
A.S. (Erbosan AS) and Erbosan Erciyas Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Intent To Rescind in Part; Calendar United States during the POR after we
Pipe Industry and Trade Co. Kayseri
Year 2013, 80 FR 18809 (April 8, 2015) (Preliminary indicated our intent to rescind the
Free Zone Branch (Erbosan FZB), Results). administrative review. Accordingly,
(collectively, the Erbosan Companies) 3 Id., 80 FR at 18810.
based on record evidence, we determine
and the Yucel Group and all affiliates 4 See Memorandum from Eric B. Greynolds,
that the Erbosan Companies and the
including Yucel Boru ye Profil Program Manager, Office III, Antidumping and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Countervailing Duty Operations through Erin Yucel Companies did not ship subject
Endustrisi A.S, Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat
Begnal, Director, Office III, Antidumping and
ye Pazarlama A.S, and Cayirova Born Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian 5 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Sanayi ye Ticaret A.S.) (collectively, the Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
Yucel Companies) that timely certified and Countervailing Duty Operations, dated June 16, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Final Results of
that they had no shipments of subject 2015 regarding Countervailing Duty Administrative Countervailing Duty (CVD) Administrative Review:
Review: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from
merchandise during the POR. Tubes from Turkey; 2013, ‘‘Extension of Time Limit Turkey,’’ dated concurrently with these final results
DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2015. for Final Results’’ (June 16, 2015). (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:23 Oct 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM 13OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_61558/page/1.svg)
![61362 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices
merchandise to the United States during Final Results of Review respondent, we assigned to those
the POR. Therefore, in accordance with In accordance with 19 CFR companies not selected for individual
19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and consistent 351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an review, the rate calculated for the
with our practice,6 we are rescinding individual subsidy rate for the Borusan Companies. As a result of this
the review for the Erbosan Companies mandatory respondent, the Borusan review, we determine the listed net
and the Yucel Companies. Companies. Because the Borusan subsidy rates for January 1, 2013,
Companies are the sole mandatory through December 31, 2013:
Net subsidy rate
Company (percent)
Borusan Group, Borusan Holding, A.S. (Borusan Holding), Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Borusan), 0.91 ad valorem.
Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. (Istikbal), and Borusan Lojistik Dagitim Pepolama Tasimacilik ve Tic A.S. (Borusan Lojistik)
(collectively, the Borusan Companies).
Umran Celik Born Sanayii A.S. (also known as Umran Steel Pipe Inc.) (Umran) ........................................................................ 0.91 ad valorem.
Guven Steel Pipe (also known as Guven Celik Born San. Ve Tic. Ltd.) (Guven) ........................................................................ 0.91 ad valorem.
Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. (Toscelik Profil), Toscelik Metal Ticaret AS., and Tosyali Dis Ticaret AS. (Tosyali) (col- 0.91 ad valorem.
lectively, the Toscelik Companies).
Assessment Rates/Cash Deposits protective order (APO) of their Comment 1: Whether the Department Erred
responsibility concerning the by Finding That Prices of HRS in Turkey
In accordance with 19 CFR Are Significantly Distorted
351.212(b)(2), the Department intends to disposition of proprietary information
Comment 2: Calculating the Share of HRS
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 disclosed under APO in accordance Accounted for by Erdemir and Isdemir
days after the date of publication of with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Comment 3: Data Sources Used in the
these final results of review to liquidate continues to govern business Calculation of the Tier-Two Benchmark
shipments of subject merchandise proprietary information in this segment Price
produced and/or exported by of proceeding. Timely written Comment 4: Calculating the Tier-Two
notification of the return/destruction of Benchmark Price Concerning Import
respondents listed above entered, or Duties and VAT
withdrawn form warehouse, for APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Comment 5: Calculating the Tier-Two
consumption on or after January 1, Benchmark Price Concerning Freight
2013, through December 31, 2013. Failure to comply with the regulations Comment 6: Whether the Method the
For the Erbosan Companies and Yucel and the terms of an APO is a Department Used To Weight Average the
Companies, the rescinded companies, sanctionable violation which is subject Tier-Two Benchmark Is Flawed
countervailing duties shall be assessed to sanction. Comment 7: Whether Erdemir and Isdemir
at rates equal to the rates for the cash These final results are issued and Are Public Bodies
published in accordance with sections Comment 8: The Department’s Specificity
deposit of estimated countervailing Determination
duties required at the time of entry, or 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Comment 9: Whether the Department Erred
withdrawal from warehouse, for Dated: October 5, 2015. in Not Selecting the Toscelik Companies
consumption, in accordance with 19 Paul Piquado, as a Mandatory Respondent
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and VII. Recommendation
intends to issue appropriate assessment Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–25989 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am]
instructions to CBP 15 days after the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
date of publication of this notice. Appendix
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the I. Summary
Act, the Department also intends to II. Rescission of the 2013 Administrative DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of Review, in Part
estimated CVDs, in the amounts shown III. Subsidies Valuation Information International Trade Administration
above for each of the respective A. Allocation Period
B. Attribution of Subsidies [A–489–822]
companies shown above, on shipments
C. Benchmark Interest Rates
of subject merchandise entered, or IV. Analysis of Programs Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of
withdrawn from warehouse, for A. Programs Determined To Be Turkey: Final Determination of Sales at
consumption on or after the date of Countervailable Less Than Fair Value
publication of the final results of this 1. Deduction from Taxable Income for
review. For all non-reviewed firms, we Export Revenue AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
will instruct CBP to continue to collect 2. Short-Term Pre-Shipment Rediscount International Trade Administration,
cash deposits at the most-recent Program Department of Commerce.
company-specific or all-others rate 3. Investment Encouragement Program SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
applicable to the company, as (IEP): Customs Duty Exemptions (the Department) determines that
4. Provision of HRS for Less Than welded line pipe from the Republic of
appropriate. These cash deposit Adequate Remuneration (LTAR)
requirements, when imposed, shall Turkey (Turkey) is being, or is likely to
B. Programs Determined Not To Confer
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
remain in effect until further notice. Countervailable Benefits
be, sold in the United States at less than
1. Inward Processing Certificate Exemption fair value (LTFV), as provided in section
Administrative Protective Order 735(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
C. Programs Determined Not to Be Used
This notice also serves as a reminder V. Non-Selected Rate amended (the Act). The period of
to parties subject to an administrative VI. Analysis of Comments investigation (POI) is October 1, 2013,
6 See, e.g., Aluminum Extrusions from the Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative
People’s Republic of China: Notice of Partial Review, 79 FR 2635 (January 15, 2014).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:23 Oct 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM 13OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_61558/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-27 08:47:57
Document Modified: 2018-02-27 08:47:57
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective Date: October 13, 2015. | |
| Contact | John Conniff at 202-482-1009, or Jolanta Lawska at 202-482-8362, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 61361 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR