80 FR 61366 - Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 197 (October 13, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 197 (October 13, 2015)
| Page Range | 61366-61368 | |
| FR Document | 2015-25980 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 197 (Tuesday, October 13, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 61366-61368] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-25980] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-876] Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that welded line pipe from the Republic of Korea (Korea) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV), as provided in section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The period of investigation (POI) is October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014. The final dumping margins of sales at LTFV are listed below in the ``Final Determination'' section of this notice. DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482- 4952, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 22, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Determination of sales at LTFV of welded line pipe from Korea.\1\ For a history of events following the publication of the Preliminary Determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum,\2\ which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 80 FR 29620 (May 22, 2015) (Preliminary Determination). \2\ See Memorandum entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The scope of the investigation covers welded line pipe, which is carbon and alloy steel pipe of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines, not more than 24 inches in nominal outside diameter. For a complete description of the scope of the investigation, see Appendix I. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,\3\ which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix II. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, during the period June through August 2015, we verified the sales and cost information submitted by HYSCO and SeAH for use in our final determination. We used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting and production records, and original source documents provided by HYSCO and SeAH.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memoranda to the File entitled ``Verification of the Cost Response of SeAH Steel Corporation in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Welded Line Pipe from Korea,'' and ``Verification of the Cost Response of Hyundai HYSCO Co. Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Welded Line Pipe from South Korea,'' dated July 31, 2015; Memorandum to the File entitled ``Verification of the Sales Responses of Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO),'' dated August 18, 2015; and Memorandum to the File entitled ``Verification of the Sales Responses of SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH) and Pusan Pipe America (PPA),'' dated August 24, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Determination Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at verification, we made certain changes to the margin calculations for HYSCO and SeAH. For a discussion of these changes, see the ``Margin Calculations'' section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. All-Others Rate Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated all- others rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted-average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins [[Page 61367]] established for exporters and producers individually investigated excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. In this investigation, we calculated weighted-average dumping margins for both mandatory respondents that are above de minimis and which are not based on section 776 of the Act. However, because there are only two relevant weighted-average dumping margins for this final determination, using a weighted-average of these two rates risks disclosure of business proprietary data. Therefore, the Department assigned a margin to the all-others rate companies based on the simple average of the two mandatory respondents' rates.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Memorandum to the File entitled ``Calculation of the All-Others Rate for the Final Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination The final weighted-average dumping margins are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted Average Exporter/Manufacturer dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hyundai HYSCO\6\............................................ 6.19 SeAH Steel Corporation...................................... 2.53 All-Others.................................................. 4.36 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of any public announcement of this notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See discussion in footnote 2 above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all appropriate entries of welded line pipe from Korea, as described in Appendix I of this notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after May 22, 2015, the date of publication of the preliminary determination of this investigation in the Federal Register. Further, the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the amount by which normal value exceeds U.S. price as follows: (1) For the mandatory respondents listed above, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the dumping margin which the Department determined in this final determination adjusted, as appropriate, for export subsidies found in the final determination of the companion countervailing duty investigation; \7\ (2) if the exporter is not a mandatory respondent identified in this investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (3) the cash deposit rates for all other producers or exporters will be 4.36 percent. The suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ In this case, although the product under investigation is also subject to a countervailing duty investigation, the Department found no countervailing duty determined to constitute an export subsidy. Therefore, we did not offset the cash deposit rates shown above for purposes of this determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITC Notification In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the ITC of the final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV. Because the final determination in this proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of welded line pipe from Korea no later than 45 days after our final determination. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all cash deposits will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, the Department will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by the Department, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders (APO) This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This determination and this notice are issued and published pursuant to sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated; October 5, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is circular welded carbon and alloy steel (other than stainless steel) pipe of a kind used for oil or gas pipelines (welded line pipe), not more than 24 inches in nominal outside diameter, regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish, end finish, or stenciling. Welded line pipe is normally produced to the American Petroleum Institute (API) specification 5L, but can be produced to comparable foreign specifications, to proprietary grades, or can be non-graded material. All pipe meeting the physical description set forth above, including multiple-stenciled pipe with an API or comparable foreign specification line pipe stencil is covered by the scope of this investigation. The welded line pipe that is subject to this investigation is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.5000, 7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 7306.19.5110, and 7306.19.5150. The subject merchandise may also enter in HTSUS 7305.11.1060 and 7305.12.1060. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum General Comments 1. Differential Pricing Analysis 2. Other Issues Related to Differential Pricing Analysis 3. Selection of Additional Mandatory/Voluntary Respondents 4. Consolidation of Grade Codes 5. Reasonableness of the Reported Costs Company-Specific Comments HYSCO 6. HYSCO's Classification of Certain ``Local Sales'' as Home Market Sales 7. Sales of Non-Prime Merchandise 8. Revision of Certain Home Market Shipment and Sales Dates 9. Allocation of Full Costs to the Production of Non-Prime Products 10. Alleged Errors Relating to the Major Input Analysis 11. Revision of G&A Expenses 12. Financial Expense Ratio 13. Constructed Value Profit 14. Affiliated Processors' Cost Data and Adjustments to the Toll Processing Costs 15. Adjustment to Steel Costs to Reflect Yield Loss 16. Unreconciled Cost Difference 17. Adjustment for Certain Fees Paid to Affiliates SeAH 18. Domestic Inland Freight [[Page 61368]] 19. U.S. Credit Expenses 20. U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses 21. Affiliated Party Purchases 22. G&A Expenses 23. Production Costs of the Pohang Plant 24. Financial Expenses [FR Doc. 2015-25980 Filed 10-9-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![61366 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE addition, a complete version of the
written notification of the return/ Issues and Decision Memorandum can
destruction of APO materials or International Trade Administration be accessed directly at http://
conversion to judicial protective order is [A–580–876] enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
hereby requested. Failure to comply The signed Issues and Decision
with the regulations and terms of an Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Memorandum and electronic version of
APO is a violation which is subject to Korea: Final Determination of Sales at the Issues and Decision Memorandum
sanction. Less Than Fair Value are identical in content.
This determination is issued and AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Scope of the Investigation
published pursuant to sections 705(d) International Trade Administration, The scope of the investigation covers
and 777(i) of the Act. Department of Commerce. welded line pipe, which is carbon and
Dated: October 5, 2015. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce alloy steel pipe of a kind used for oil
Paul Piquado, (the Department) determines that and gas pipelines, not more than 24
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and welded line pipe from the Republic of inches in nominal outside diameter. For
Compliance. Korea (Korea) is being, or is likely to be, a complete description of the scope of
sold in the United States at less than fair the investigation, see Appendix I.
Appendix I
value (LTFV), as provided in section Analysis of Comments Received
Scope of the Investigation 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). The period of All issues raised in the case and
The merchandise covered by this
investigation (POI) is October 1, 2013, rebuttal briefs by parties in this
investigation is circular welded carbon and
alloy steel (other than stainless steel) pipe of through September 30, 2014. The final investigation are addressed in the Issues
a kind used for oil or gas pipelines (welded dumping margins of sales at LTFV are and Decision Memorandum,3 which is
line pipe), not more than 24 inches in listed below in the ‘‘Final hereby adopted by this notice. A list of
nominal outside diameter, regardless of wall Determination’’ section of this notice. the issues raised is attached to this
thickness, length, surface finish, end finish, notice as Appendix II.
DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2015.
or stenciling. Welded line pipe is normally Verification
produced to the American Petroleum FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Institute (API) specification 5L, but can be David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau, As provided in section 782(i) of the
produced to comparable foreign AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Act, during the period June through
specifications, to proprietary grades, or can Enforcement and Compliance, August 2015, we verified the sales and
be non-graded material. All pipe meeting the International Trade Administration, cost information submitted by HYSCO
physical description set forth above, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 and SeAH for use in our final
including multiple-stenciled pipe with an Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC determination. We used standard
API or comparable foreign specification line 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4136 or verification procedures, including an
pipe stencil is covered by the scope of this (202) 482–4952, respectively. examination of relevant accounting and
investigation. production records, and original source
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The welded line pipe that is subject to this
documents provided by HYSCO and
investigation is currently classifiable in the Background SeAH.4
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS) under subheadings On May 22, 2015, the Department
Changes Since the Preliminary
7305.11.1030, 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, published the Preliminary
Determination
7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.5000, Determination of sales at LTFV of
7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 7306.19.5110, welded line pipe from Korea.1 For a Based on our analysis of the
and 7306.19.5150. The subject merchandise history of events following the comments received and our findings at
may also enter in HTSUS 7305.11.1060 and publication of the Preliminary verification, we made certain changes to
7305.12.1060. While the HTSUS subheadings Determination, see the Issues and the margin calculations for HYSCO and
are provided for convenience and customs Decision Memorandum,2 which is SeAH. For a discussion of these
purposes, the written description of the hereby adopted by this notice. The changes, see the ‘‘Margin Calculations’’
scope of this investigation is dispositive. Issues and Decision Memorandum is a section of the Issues and Decision
public document and is on file Memorandum.
Appendix II
electronically via Enforcement and All-Others Rate
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Decision Memorandum Countervailing Duty Centralized Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
I. Summary Electronic Service System (ACCESS). provides that the estimated all-others
II. Background ACCESS is available to registered users rate shall be an amount equal to the
III. Scope of the Investigation at https://access.trade.gov and it is weighted-average of the estimated
IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available available to all parties in the Central weighted-average dumping margins
V. Subsidies Valuation
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
VI. Analysis of Programs 3 See Id.
VII. Analysis of Comments Department of Commerce building. In 4 See Memoranda to the File entitled
1. Electricity for Less Than Adequate ‘‘Verification of the Cost Response of SeAH Steel
1 See Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of
Remuneration (LTAR) Corporation in the Antidumping Duty Investigation
Korea: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less of Welded Line Pipe from Korea,’’ and ‘‘Verification
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Unreported Subsidies
Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final of the Cost Response of Hyundai HYSCO Co. Ltd.
3. Specificity of RSTA Tax Programs Determination, 80 FR 29620 (May 22, 2015) in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Welded
4. Special Rural Development Tax (Preliminary Determination). Line Pipe from South Korea,’’ dated July 31, 2015;
5. Husteel as a Mandatory or Voluntary 2 See Memorandum entitled ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum to the File entitled ‘‘Verification of
Respondent Memorandum for the Final Affirmative the Sales Responses of Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO),’’
VIII. Recommendation Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value dated August 18, 2015; and Memorandum to the
Investigation of Welded Line Pipe from the File entitled ‘‘Verification of the Sales Responses of
[FR Doc. 2015–25967 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 a.m.] Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently with this SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH) and Pusan Pipe
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). America (PPA),’’ dated August 24, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:23 Oct 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM 13OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_61563/page/1.svg)
![61368 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices
19. U.S. Credit Expenses Scope of the Order Department will instruct U.S. Customs
20. U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate
21. Affiliated Party Purchases The merchandise subject to the
Order 2 is OBAs and is currently all appropriate entries for TFM without
22. G&A Expenses regard to antidumping duties.
23. Production Costs of the Pohang Plant classifiable under subheadings
3204.20.8000, 2933.69.6050, Consistent with the Department’s
24. Financial Expenses
2921.59.4000 and 2921.59.8090 of the assessment practice, for entries of
[FR Doc. 2015–25980 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am] subject merchandise during the POR
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
United States (HTSUS). While the produced by TFM for which it did not
HTSUS numbers are provided for know that the merchandise was
destined for the United States, we will
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE convenience and customs purposes, the
instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed
written product description remains
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
International Trade Administration dispositive.3
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
Analysis of the Comments Received involved in the transaction.5
[A–583–848] We intend to issue instructions to
All issues raised in the case brief
submitted in this review are addressed CBP 15 days after publication of the
Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening final results of this review.
Agents From Taiwan: Final Results of in the Issues and Decision
Antidumping Duty Administrative Memorandum, which is hereby adopted Cash Deposit Requirements
Review; 2013–2014 with this notice. A list of the issues The following cash deposit
raised is attached as an Appendix to this requirements will be effective upon
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, notice. The Issues and Decision publication of the notice of final results
International Trade Administration, Memorandum is a public document and of administrative review for all
Department of Commerce. is on file electronically via Enforcement shipments of OBAs from Taiwan
SUMMARY: On June 5, 2015, the and Compliance’s Antidumping and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
Department of Commerce (the Countervailing Duty Centralized for consumption on or after the date of
Department) published the preliminary Electronic Service System (ACCESS). publication as provided by section
results of the administrative review of ACCESS is available to registered users 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
the antidumping duty order on certain at http://access.trade.gov and it is rate for TFM will be 0.00 percent, the
stilbenic optical brightening agents available to all parties in the Central weighted average dumping margin
(OBAs) from Taiwan.1 The period of Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main established in the final results of this
review (POR) is May 1, 2013, through Department of Commerce building. In administrative review; (2) for other
April 30, 2014. The review covers one addition, a complete version of the manufacturers and exporters covered in
producer/exporter of the subject Issues and Decision Memorandum can a prior segment of the proceeding, the
merchandise, Teh Fong Ming be accessed directly at http:// cash deposit rate will continue to be the
International Co., Ltd. (TFM). For the enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. company-specific rate published for the
final results, we find that TFM has not Changes Since the Preliminary Results most recently completed segment of this
sold subject merchandise at less than proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
Based on our analysis of the firm covered in this review, a prior
normal value.
comments received, we made certain review, or the original investigation, but
DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2015. changes to the Preliminary Results. For the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: a discussion of these changes, see Issues rate will be the rate established for the
Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/ and Decision Memorandum. most recently completed segment of this
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement Final Results of Review proceeding for the manufacturer of
and Compliance, International Trade subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
As a result of this review, we
Administration, U.S. Department of deposit rate for all other manufacturers
determine that a weighted-average
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution or exporters will continue to be 6.19
dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; percent, the all-others rate established
for TFM for the period May 1, 2013,
telephone: (202) 482–1757, and (202) in the less than fair value investigation.6
through April 30, 2014.
482–1690, respectively. These cash deposit requirements, when
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Assessment imposed, shall remain in effect until
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212 further notice.
Background and the Final Modification,4 the Notification to Importers
On June 5, 2015, the Department This notice serves as a final reminder
2 See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents
published the Preliminary Results of to importers of their responsibility
From Taiwan: Amended Final Determination of
this review in the Federal Register. We Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
invited parties to comment on the Duty Order, 77 FR 27419 (May 10, 2012) (Order). certificate regarding the reimbursement
Preliminary Results. On July 20, 2015, 3 A full description of the scope of the Order is
of antidumping duties prior to
TFM submitted a case brief. No other contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and liquidation of the relevant entries
party submitted case or rebuttal briefs. Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy during this review period. Failure to
No party requested a hearing. The Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and comply with this requirement could
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Department conducted this review in Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain Stilbenic
result in the Secretary’s presumption
accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Optical Brightening Agents from Taiwan: Issues and
Decision Memorandum for Final Results of
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
2014’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification).
1 See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 5 For a full discussion, see Antidumping and
From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of
Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2104, 80 FR the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
32085 (June 5, 2015) (Preliminary Results). Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 6 The all-others rate established in the Order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:23 Oct 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM 13OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_61563/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-27 08:48:03
Document Modified: 2018-02-27 08:48:03
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective Date: October 13, 2015. | |
| Contact | David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482- 4952, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 61366 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR