80_FR_63686 80 FR 63484 - Medicare Program; Request for Information Regarding Implementation of the Merit Based Incentive Payment System, Promotion of Alternative Payment Models, and Incentive Payments for Participation in Eligible Alternative Payment Models

80 FR 63484 - Medicare Program; Request for Information Regarding Implementation of the Merit Based Incentive Payment System, Promotion of Alternative Payment Models, and Incentive Payments for Participation in Eligible Alternative Payment Models

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 202 (October 20, 2015)

Page Range63484-63485
FR Document2015-26568

This document extends the comment period for the October 1, 2015 document entitled ``Request for Information Regarding Implementation of the Merit-based Incentive Payment System, Promotion of Alternative Payment Models, and Incentive Payments for Participation in Eligible Alternative Payment Models'' (80 FR 59102, referred to in this document as ``the October 1 RFI''). The comment period for the October 1 RFI, which would have ended on November 2, 2015, is extended for an additional 15 days. This document also advises the public and stakeholders of CMS priorities for the information sought in the October 1 RFI, and suggests that commenters may choose to focus their attention and comments accordingly.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 202 (Tuesday, October 20, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 202 (Tuesday, October 20, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63484-63485]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26568]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

42 CFR Part 414

[CMS-3321-NC2]


Medicare Program; Request for Information Regarding 
Implementation of the Merit Based Incentive Payment System, Promotion 
of Alternative Payment Models, and Incentive Payments for Participation 
in Eligible Alternative Payment Models

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Request for information; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document extends the comment period for the October 1, 
2015 document entitled ``Request for Information Regarding 
Implementation of the Merit-based Incentive Payment System, Promotion 
of Alternative Payment Models, and Incentive Payments for Participation 
in Eligible Alternative Payment Models'' (80 FR 59102, referred to in 
this document as ``the October 1 RFI''). The comment period for the 
October 1 RFI, which would have ended on November 2, 2015, is extended 
for an additional 15 days. This document also advises the public and 
stakeholders of CMS priorities for the information sought in the 
October 1 RFI, and suggests that commenters may choose to focus their 
attention and comments accordingly.

DATES: The comment period for the October 1, 2015 RFI (80 FR 59102) is 
extended to November 17, 2015. To be assured consideration, written or 
electronic comments on the October 1, 2015 RFI must be received at one 
of the addresses provided below no later than November 17, 2015.

ADDRESSES: In commenting on the October 1, 2015 RFI, please refer 
either to file code CMS-3321-NC and comment as indicated in that 
document (80 FR 59102) or refer to file code CMS-3321-NC2 and comment 
as provided here. Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot 
accept comments by facsimile (FAX) transmission.
    You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one 
of the ways listed):
    1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this 
regulation to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a 
comment'' instructions.
    2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following 
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of 
Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-3321-NC2, P.O. Box 8016, 
Baltimore, MD 21244-8016.
    Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received 
before the close of the comment period.
    3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to 
the following address only: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-3321-NC2, Mail 
Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
    4. By hand or courier. Alternatively, you may deliver (by hand or 
courier) your written comments ONLY to the following addresses prior to 
the close of the comment period:
    a. For delivery in Washington, DC--Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert 
H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20201.
    (Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building 
is not readily available to persons without federal government 
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in 
the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing 
by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being 
filed.)
    b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, 7500 Security 
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
    If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address, 
call telephone number (410) 786-9994 in advance to schedule your 
arrival with one of our staff members.
    Comments erroneously mailed to the addresses indicated as 
appropriate for hand or courier delivery may be delayed and received 
after the comment period.
    Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the 
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public, 
including any personally identifiable or confidential business 
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments 
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web 
site as soon as possible after they have been received: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web site to 
view public comments. Comments received timely will also be available 
for public inspection as they are received, generally beginning 
approximately 3 weeks after publication of a document, at the 
headquarters of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of 
each week from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view 
public comments, phone 1-800-743-3951.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Molly MacHarris, (410) 786-4461.
    Alison Falb, (410) 786-1169.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 1, 2015, we published a request 
for information in the Federal Register (80 FR 59102) entitled, 
``Request for Information Regarding Implementation of the Merit-based 
Incentive Payment System, Promotion of Alternative Payment Models, and 
Incentive Payments for Participation in Eligible Alternative Payment 
Models'' (referred to in this document as ``the October 1 RFI''). 
Section 101 of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 
(MACRA) repeals the Medicare sustainable growth rate (SGR) methodology 
for updates to the physician fee schedule (PFS) and replaces it with a 
new Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) for MIPS eligible 
professionals (MIPS EPs) under the PFS. Section 101 of the MACRA (Pub. 
L. 114-10, enacted April 16, 2015) sunsets payment adjustments under 
the current Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), the Value-Based 
Payment Modifier (VM), and the Electronic Health Records (EHR)

[[Page 63485]]

Incentive Program. It also consolidates aspects of the PQRS, VM, and 
EHR Incentive Program into the new MIPS. Additionally, section 101 of 
the MACRA promotes the development of Alternative Payment Models (APMs) 
by providing incentive payments for certain eligible professionals 
(EPs) who participate in APMs, by exempting EPs from the MIPS if they 
are qualifying APM participants, and by encouraging the creation of 
physician-focused payment models (PFPMs). In the request for 
information, we seek public and stakeholder input to inform the 
implementation of these provisions.
    We have received inquiries from national organizations regarding 
the 30-day comment period we provided for the October 1 RFI. The 
organizations stated that they need additional time to respond as a 
result of the number and depth of questions posed in the October 1 RFI. 
Since we requested the public to comment on various aspects of MIPS and 
APMs, we believe that it is important to allow ample time for the 
public to prepare comments regarding the October 1 RFI. Therefore, we 
have decided to extend the comment period for an additional 15 days. 
This document announces the extension of the public comment period to 
November 17, 2015.
    While we continue to welcome comments on all questions asked in the 
October 1 RFI, we suggest that the public and stakeholders may choose 
to focus their attention on issues that are a higher priority for CMS. 
To assist commenters in considering and formulating their comments on 
the October 1 RFI, we identify the following sections and questions, 
which we have categorized in descending order of priority for CMS.
     For Section II, Subsection A (The Merit-Based Incentive 
Program System (MIPS)) of the request for information, each component 
(sub-subsection) under Subsection A has been prioritized by the 
following categories, in which all questions listed in the October 1 
RFI that are within each component correspond to the specified priority 
category.
    [cir] Priority Category One:

--Sub-Subsection 1 (MIPS EP Identifier and Exclusions)
--Sub-Subsection 3 (Quality Performance Category)
--Sub-Subsection 4 (Resource Use Performance Category)
--Sub-Subsection 5 (Clinical Practice Improvement Activities 
Performance Category)
--Sub-Subsection 6 (Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology 
Performance Category)

    [cir] Priority Category Two:

--Sub-Subsection 2 (Virtual Groups)
--Sub-Subsection 8 (Development of Performance Standards)
--Sub-Subsection 12 (Feedback Reports)

    [cir] Priority Category Three:

--Sub-Subsection 7 (Other Measures)
--Sub-Subsection 9 (Flexibility in Weighting Performance Categories)
--Sub-Subsection 10 (MIPS Composite Performance Score and Performance 
Threshold)
--Sub-Subsection 11 (Public Reporting)

     For Section II, Subsection B (Alternative Payment Models) 
of the October 1 RFI, the following questions have been prioritized.
    [cir] Priority Category:

--How should CMS define ``services furnished under this part through an 
EAPM entity''?
--What types of data and information can EPs submit to CMS for purposes 
of determining whether they meet the non-Medicare share of the 
Combination All-Payer and Medicare Payment Threshold, and how can they 
be securely shared with the federal government?
--What criteria could the Secretary consider for determining 
comparability of state Medicaid medical home models to medical home 
models expanded under section 1115A(c) of the Act?
--Which states' Medicaid medical home models might meet criteria 
comparable to medical homes expanded under section 1115A(c) of the Act?
--How should CMS define ``use'' of certified EHR technology as defined 
in section 1848(o)(4) of the Act by participants in an APM? For 
example, should the APM require participants to report quality measures 
to all payers using certified EHR technology or only payers who require 
EHR reported measures? Should all professionals in the APM in which an 
EAPM entity participates be required to use certified EHR technology or 
a particular subset?
--What criteria should be used by the Physician-focused Payment Model 
Technical Advisory Committee for assessing PFPM proposals submitted by 
stakeholders? We are interested in hearing suggestions related to the 
criteria discussed in this RFI as well as other criteria.
--What are examples of methodologies for attributing and counting 
patients in lieu of using payments to determine whether an EP is a 
qualifying APM participant (QP) or partial QP?
--What is the appropriate type or types of ``financial risk'' under 
section 1833(z)(3)(D)(ii)(I) of the Act to be considered an eligible 
APM (EAPM) entity?
--What is the appropriate level of financial risk ``in excess of a 
nominal amount'' under section 1833(z)(3)(D)(ii)(I) of the Act to be 
considered an EAPM entity?
--What criteria could be considered when determining ``comparability'' 
to MIPS of quality measures used to identify an EAPM entity? Please 
provide specific examples for measures, measure types (for example, 
structure, process, outcome, and other types), data source for measures 
(for example, patients/caregivers, medical records, billing claims, 
etc.), measure domains, standards, and comparable methodology.

    Dated: October 14, 2015.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2015-26568 Filed 10-15-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 4120-01-P



                                                    63484                 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules

                                                    parties interested in commenting on this                commenters may choose to focus their                  Services, Department of Health and
                                                    action should do so at this time.                       attention and comments accordingly.                   Human Services, 7500 Security
                                                       We are also proposing to approve a                   DATES: The comment period for the                     Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
                                                    ministerial change to the Code of                       October 1, 2015 RFI (80 FR 59102) is                     If you intend to deliver your
                                                    Federal Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR                     extended to November 17, 2015. To be                  comments to the Baltimore address, call
                                                    52.1620(e). The entry titled ‘‘City of                  assured consideration, written or                     telephone number (410) 786–9994 in
                                                    Albuquerque request for redesignation’’                 electronic comments on the October 1,                 advance to schedule your arrival with
                                                    was mistakenly placed in the first table                2015 RFI must be received at one of the               one of our staff members.
                                                    of 40 CFR 52.1620(e) under the heading                  addresses provided below no later than                   Comments erroneously mailed to the
                                                    ‘‘EPA Approved city of Albuquerque                      November 17, 2015.                                    addresses indicated as appropriate for
                                                    and Bernalillo County Ordinances for                    ADDRESSES: In commenting on the                       hand or courier delivery may be delayed
                                                    State Board Composition and Conflict of                 October 1, 2015 RFI, please refer either              and received after the comment period.
                                                    Interest Provisions’’ and belongs in the                to file code CMS–3321–NC and                             Inspection of Public Comments: All
                                                    second table of 40 CFR 52.1620(e) under                 comment as indicated in that document                 comments received before the close of
                                                    the heading ‘‘EPA-Approved                              (80 FR 59102) or refer to file code CMS–              the comment period are available for
                                                    Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-                     3321–NC2 and comment as provided                      viewing by the public, including any
                                                    Regulatory Measures in the New Mexico                   here. Because of staff and resource                   personally identifiable or confidential
                                                    SIP.’’                                                  limitations, we cannot accept comments                business information that is included in
                                                       For additional information, see the                  by facsimile (FAX) transmission.                      a comment. We post all comments
                                                    direct final rule which is located in the                  You may submit comments in one of                  received before the close of the
                                                    rules section of this Federal Register.                 four ways (please choose only one of the              comment period on the following Web
                                                      Dated: September 30, 2015.                            ways listed):                                         site as soon as possible after they have
                                                    Ron Curry,
                                                                                                               1. Electronically. You may submit                  been received: http://
                                                                                                            electronic comments on this regulation                www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
                                                    Regional Administrator, Region 6.
                                                                                                            to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow                 instructions on that Web site to view
                                                    [FR Doc. 2015–26303 Filed 10–19–15; 8:45 am]            the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.                public comments. Comments received
                                                    BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                     2. By regular mail. You may mail                   timely will also be available for public
                                                                                                            written comments to the following                     inspection as they are received,
                                                                                                            address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &                  generally beginning approximately 3
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND                                Medicaid Services, Department of                      weeks after publication of a document,
                                                    HUMAN SERVICES                                          Health and Human Services, Attention:                 at the headquarters of the Centers for
                                                                                                            CMS–3321–NC2, P.O. Box 8016,                          Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500
                                                    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid                         Baltimore, MD 21244–8016.                             Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
                                                    Services                                                   Please allow sufficient time for mailed            Maryland 21244, Monday through
                                                                                                            comments to be received before the                    Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to
                                                    42 CFR Part 414                                         close of the comment period.                          4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to
                                                    [CMS–3321–NC2]
                                                                                                               3. By express or overnight mail. You               view public comments, phone 1–800–
                                                                                                            may send written comments to the                      743–3951.
                                                    Medicare Program; Request for                           following address only: Centers for
                                                                                                                                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                    Information Regarding Implementation                    Medicare & Medicaid Services,
                                                                                                                                                                     Molly MacHarris, (410) 786–4461.
                                                    of the Merit Based Incentive Payment                    Department of Health and Human
                                                                                                                                                                     Alison Falb, (410) 786–1169.
                                                    System, Promotion of Alternative                        Services, Attention: CMS–3321–NC2,
                                                                                                            Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security                     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
                                                    Payment Models, and Incentive                                                                                 October 1, 2015, we published a request
                                                    Payments for Participation in Eligible                  Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
                                                                                                               4. By hand or courier. Alternatively,              for information in the Federal Register
                                                    Alternative Payment Models                                                                                    (80 FR 59102) entitled, ‘‘Request for
                                                                                                            you may deliver (by hand or courier)
                                                    AGENCY:  Centers for Medicare &                         your written comments ONLY to the                     Information Regarding Implementation
                                                    Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.                           following addresses prior to the close of             of the Merit-based Incentive Payment
                                                    ACTION: Request for information;                        the comment period:                                   System, Promotion of Alternative
                                                    extension of comment period.                               a. For delivery in Washington, DC—                 Payment Models, and Incentive
                                                                                                            Centers for Medicare & Medicaid                       Payments for Participation in Eligible
                                                    SUMMARY:    This document extends the                   Services, Department of Health and                    Alternative Payment Models’’ (referred
                                                    comment period for the October 1, 2015                  Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert                    to in this document as ‘‘the October 1
                                                    document entitled ‘‘Request for                         H. Humphrey Building, 200                             RFI’’). Section 101 of the Medicare
                                                    Information Regarding Implementation                    Independence Avenue SW.,                              Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of
                                                    of the Merit-based Incentive Payment                    Washington, DC 20201.                                 2015 (MACRA) repeals the Medicare
                                                    System, Promotion of Alternative                           (Because access to the interior of the             sustainable growth rate (SGR)
                                                    Payment Models, and Incentive                           Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not                    methodology for updates to the
                                                    Payments for Participation in Eligible                  readily available to persons without                  physician fee schedule (PFS) and
                                                    Alternative Payment Models’’ (80 FR                     federal government identification,                    replaces it with a new Merit-based
                                                    59102, referred to in this document as                  commenters are encouraged to leave                    Incentive Payment System (MIPS) for
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                    ‘‘the October 1 RFI’’). The comment                     their comments in the CMS drop slots                  MIPS eligible professionals (MIPS EPs)
                                                    period for the October 1 RFI, which                     located in the main lobby of the                      under the PFS. Section 101 of the
                                                    would have ended on November 2,                         building. A stamp-in clock is available               MACRA (Pub. L. 114–10, enacted April
                                                    2015, is extended for an additional 15                  for persons wishing to retain a proof of              16, 2015) sunsets payment adjustments
                                                    days. This document also advises the                    filing by stamping in and retaining an                under the current Physician Quality
                                                    public and stakeholders of CMS                          extra copy of the comments being filed.)              Reporting System (PQRS), the Value-
                                                    priorities for the information sought in                   b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—                  Based Payment Modifier (VM), and the
                                                    the October 1 RFI, and suggests that                    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid                       Electronic Health Records (EHR)


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:59 Oct 19, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00012   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM   20OCP1


                                                                          Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules                                               63485

                                                    Incentive Program. It also consolidates                   Æ Priority Category Two:                             1833(z)(3)(D)(ii)(I) of the Act to be
                                                    aspects of the PQRS, VM, and EHR                        —Sub-Subsection 2 (Virtual Groups)                     considered an eligible APM (EAPM)
                                                    Incentive Program into the new MIPS.                    —Sub-Subsection 8 (Development of                      entity?
                                                    Additionally, section 101 of the MACRA                    Performance Standards)                              —What is the appropriate level of
                                                    promotes the development of                             —Sub-Subsection 12 (Feedback Reports)                  financial risk ‘‘in excess of a nominal
                                                    Alternative Payment Models (APMs) by                      Æ Priority Category Three:                           amount’’ under section
                                                    providing incentive payments for                        —Sub-Subsection 7 (Other Measures)                     1833(z)(3)(D)(ii)(I) of the Act to be
                                                    certain eligible professionals (EPs) who                —Sub-Subsection 9 (Flexibility in                      considered an EAPM entity?
                                                    participate in APMs, by exempting EPs                     Weighting Performance Categories)                   —What criteria could be considered
                                                    from the MIPS if they are qualifying                    —Sub-Subsection 10 (MIPS Composite                     when determining ‘‘comparability’’ to
                                                    APM participants, and by encouraging                      Performance Score and Performance                    MIPS of quality measures used to
                                                    the creation of physician-focused                         Threshold)                                           identify an EAPM entity? Please
                                                    payment models (PFPMs). In the request                  —Sub-Subsection 11 (Public Reporting)                  provide specific examples for
                                                    for information, we seek public and                       • For Section II, Subsection B                       measures, measure types (for
                                                    stakeholder input to inform the                         (Alternative Payment Models) of the                    example, structure, process, outcome,
                                                    implementation of these provisions.                     October 1 RFI, the following questions                 and other types), data source for
                                                       We have received inquiries from                      have been prioritized.                                 measures (for example, patients/
                                                    national organizations regarding the 30-                  Æ Priority Category:                                 caregivers, medical records, billing
                                                    day comment period we provided for                      —How should CMS define ‘‘services                      claims, etc.), measure domains,
                                                    the October 1 RFI. The organizations                      furnished under this part through an                 standards, and comparable
                                                    stated that they need additional time to                  EAPM entity’’?                                       methodology.
                                                    respond as a result of the number and                   —What types of data and information                     Dated: October 14, 2015.
                                                    depth of questions posed in the October                   can EPs submit to CMS for purposes                  Andrew M. Slavitt,
                                                    1 RFI. Since we requested the public to                   of determining whether they meet the                Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
                                                    comment on various aspects of MIPS                        non-Medicare share of the                           & Medicaid Services.
                                                    and APMs, we believe that it is                           Combination All-Payer and Medicare                  [FR Doc. 2015–26568 Filed 10–15–15; 4:15 pm]
                                                    important to allow ample time for the                     Payment Threshold, and how can                      BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
                                                    public to prepare comments regarding                      they be securely shared with the
                                                    the October 1 RFI. Therefore, we have                     federal government?
                                                    decided to extend the comment period                    —What criteria could the Secretary
                                                    for an additional 15 days. This                           consider for determining                            GENERAL SERVICES
                                                    document announces the extension of                       comparability of state Medicaid                     ADMINISTRATION
                                                    the public comment period to November                     medical home models to medical
                                                    17, 2015.                                                                                                     DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
                                                                                                              home models expanded under section
                                                       While we continue to welcome                           1115A(c) of the Act?
                                                    comments on all questions asked in the                                                                        NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
                                                                                                            —Which states’ Medicaid medical home
                                                    October 1 RFI, we suggest that the                                                                            SPACE ADMINISTRATION
                                                                                                              models might meet criteria
                                                    public and stakeholders may choose to                     comparable to medical homes
                                                    focus their attention on issues that are                                                                      48 CFR Part 53
                                                                                                              expanded under section 1115A(c) of
                                                    a higher priority for CMS. To assist                      the Act?                                            [FAR Case 2015–025; Docket No. 2015–
                                                    commenters in considering and                           —How should CMS define ‘‘use’’ of                     0025; Sequence No. 1]
                                                    formulating their comments on the                         certified EHR technology as defined                 RIN 9000–AN11
                                                    October 1 RFI, we identify the following                  in section 1848(o)(4) of the Act by
                                                    sections and questions, which we have                     participants in an APM? For example,                Federal Acquisition Regulation:
                                                    categorized in descending order of                        should the APM require participants                 Revision to Standard Forms for Bonds
                                                    priority for CMS.                                         to report quality measures to all
                                                       • For Section II, Subsection A (The                    payers using certified EHR technology               AGENCY:  Department of Defense (DoD),
                                                    Merit-Based Incentive Program System                      or only payers who require EHR                      General Services Administration (GSA),
                                                    (MIPS)) of the request for information,                   reported measures? Should all                       and National Aeronautics and Space
                                                    each component (sub-subsection) under                     professionals in the APM in which an                Administration (NASA).
                                                    Subsection A has been prioritized by the                  EAPM entity participates be required                ACTION: Proposed rule.
                                                    following categories, in which all                        to use certified EHR technology or a
                                                                                                                                                                  SUMMARY:    DoD, GSA, and NASA are
                                                    questions listed in the October 1 RFI                     particular subset?
                                                                                                            —What criteria should be used by the                  proposing to revise Standard Forms
                                                    that are within each component
                                                                                                              Physician-focused Payment Model                     prescribed by the Federal Acquisition
                                                    correspond to the specified priority
                                                                                                              Technical Advisory Committee for                    Regulation (FAR) for contracts involving
                                                    category.
                                                       Æ Priority Category One:                               assessing PFPM proposals submitted                  bonds and other financial protections.
                                                                                                              by stakeholders? We are interested in               The revisions are aimed at clarifying
                                                    —Sub-Subsection 1 (MIPS EP Identifier                                                                         liability limitations and expanding the
                                                       and Exclusions)                                        hearing suggestions related to the
                                                                                                              criteria discussed in this RFI as well              options for organization types.
                                                    —Sub-Subsection 3 (Quality
                                                                                                                                                                  DATES: Interested parties should submit
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                       Performance Category)                                  as other criteria.
                                                    —Sub-Subsection 4 (Resource Use                         —What are examples of methodologies                   written comments to the Regulatory
                                                       Performance Category)                                  for attributing and counting patients               Secretariat at one of the addresses
                                                    —Sub-Subsection 5 (Clinical Practice                      in lieu of using payments to                        shown below on or before December 21,
                                                       Improvement Activities Performance                     determine whether an EP is a                        2015 to be considered in the formation
                                                       Category)                                              qualifying APM participant (QP) or                  of the final rule.
                                                    —Sub-Subsection 6 (Meaningful Use of                      partial QP?                                         ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
                                                       Certified EHR Technology                             —What is the appropriate type or types                response to FAR Case 2015–025 by any
                                                       Performance Category)                                  of ‘‘financial risk’’ under section                 of the following methods:


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:59 Oct 19, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00013   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM   20OCP1



Document Created: 2015-12-14 15:25:43
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 15:25:43
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionRequest for information; extension of comment period.
DatesThe comment period for the October 1, 2015 RFI (80 FR 59102) is extended to November 17, 2015. To be assured consideration, written or electronic comments on the October 1, 2015 RFI must be received at one
ContactMolly MacHarris, (410) 786-4461.
FR Citation80 FR 63484 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR