80 FR 63535 - Supercalendered Paper From Canada: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 202 (October 20, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 202 (October 20, 2015)
| Page Range | 63535-63537 | |
| FR Document | 2015-26634 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 202 (Tuesday, October 20, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 63535-63537] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-26634] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-122-854] Supercalendered Paper From Canada: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of supercalendered paper (SC paper) from Canada. The period of investigation is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. DATES: Effective Date: October 20, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana Mermelstein or David Neubacher, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1391 and (202) 482-5823, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The petitioner in this investigation is the Coalition for Fair Paper Imports. The Coalition for Fair Paper Imports is composed of Madison Paper Industries and Verso Corporation. In addition to the Government of Canada, the mandatory respondents in this investigation are (1) Port Hawkesbury Paper LP, 6879900 Canada Inc., Port Hawkesbury Investments Ltd., Port Hawkesbury Paper GP, Port Hawkesbury Paper Holdings Ltd., Port Hawkesbury Paper Inc., and Pacific West Commercial Corporation (collectively, Port Hawkesbury); and (2) Resolute FP Canada Inc., Fibrek General Partnership, Forest Products Mauricie LP, Produits Forestiers Petit-Paris Inc., and Soci[eacute]t[eacute] en Commandite Scierie Opitciwan (collectively, Resolute). Case History The events that have occurred since the Department published the Preliminary Determination \1\ on August 3, 2015, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and [[Page 63536]] Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Supercalendered Paper from Canada: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 80 FR 45951 (August 3, 2015) (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, regarding ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Supercalendered Paper from Canada,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is SC paper. For a complete description of the scope of the investigation, see Appendix 1 to this notice. Methodology The Department conducted this countervailing duty investigation in accordance with section 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The subsidy programs under investigation and the issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that parties have raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as Appendix 2. Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at verification, we made certain changes to the respondents' subsidy rate calculations since the Preliminary Determination. For this determination, we have relied partially on facts available for Resolute. Further, we have drawn an adverse inference in selecting from among the facts otherwise available to calculate the ad valorem rate for Resolute, because the company did not act to the best of its ability when responding to the Department's request for information.\3\ For further information, see ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences'' in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we calculated a rate for each individually investigated respondent company. Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act states that, for companies not individually investigated, we will determine an ``all others'' rate equal to the weighted-average countervailable subsidy rates established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis countervailable subsidy rates, and any rates determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. Notwithstanding the language of section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, we have calculated the ``all others'' rate as a weighted average of the rates of Port Hawkesbury and Resolute, using the publicly ranged values for each company's exports of subject merchandise to the United States to calculate the weighted average, because to use the actual sales values risks disclosure of proprietary information.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum to the File, ``Calculation of the All Others Rate for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Supercalendered Paper from Canada,'' (October 13, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We determine the countervailable subsidy rates to be: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy Company rate (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Port Hawkesbury............................................. 20.18 Resolute.................................................... 17.87 All Others.................................................. 18.85 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ As a result of our Preliminary Determination, and pursuant to section 703(d) of the Act, we instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all entries of subject merchandise from Canada that were entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after August 3, 2013, the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register, and to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duty at the rates determined in the Preliminary Determination. In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, we are directing CBP to continue to suspend liquidation of all imports of the subject merchandise from Canada that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice. We are also directing CBP to collect cash deposit of estimated countervailing duty at the rates identified above. We will issue a countervailing duty order pursuant to section 706(a) of the Act if the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final affirmative injury determination. If the ITC determines that material injury, or threat of material injury, does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated and all estimated duties deposited or securities posted as a result of the suspension of liquidation will be refunded or canceled. ITC Notification In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the ITC of our determination. In addition, we are making available to the ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information related to this investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC confirms that it will not disclose such information, either publicly or under an administrative protective order (APO), without the written consent of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information In the event that the ITC issues a final negative injury determination, this notice will serve as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 705(d) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: October 13, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix 1 Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is supercalendered paper (SC paper). SC paper is uncoated paper that has undergone a calendering process in which the base sheet, made of pulp and filler (typically, but not limited to, clay, talc, or other mineral additive), is processed through a set of supercalenders, a supercalender, or a soft nip calender operation.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Supercalendering and soft nip calendering processing, in conjunction with the mineral filler contained in the base paper, are performed to enhance the surface characteristics of the paper by imparting a smooth and glossy printing surface. Supercalendering and soft nip calendering also increase the density of the base paper. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The scope of this investigation covers all SC paper regardless of basis weight, brightness, opacity, smoothness, or grade, and whether in rolls or in sheets. Further, the scope covers all SC paper that meets the scope definition regardless of the type of pulp fiber or filler material used to produce the paper. Specifically excluded from the scope are imports of paper printed with final content of printed text or graphics. Subject merchandise primarily enters under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 4802.61.3035, but may also enter under subheadings 4802.61.3010, 4802.62.3000, 4802.62.6020, and 4802.69.3000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the [[Page 63537]] written description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive. Appendix 2 List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Investigation IV. Subsidies Valuation a. Period of Investigation b. Allocation Period c. Attribution of Subsidies d. Denominators e. Loan Interest Rate Benchmarks and Discount Rates V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences VI. Analysis of Programs a. Programs Determined to be Countervailable b. Programs Determined To Be Not Used or Not to Confer a Benefit During the POI c. Program Determined To Be Not Countervailable VII. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: The Department's Selection of Mandatory and Voluntary Respondents Comment 2: The Calculation of the All Other's Rate Comment 3: Whether the Department Should Allow Irving to Post Bonds Until the Final Results of an Expedited Review Comment 4: Whether Port Hawkesbury is Creditworthy Comment 5: Whether the GNS' Hot Idle Funding is Extinguished Comment 6: Whether the GNS' FIF Funding is Extinguished Comment 7: Whether Assistance Under the Outreach Agreement is Countervailable Comment 8: Whether Port Hawkesbury's Private Stumpage Purchases Provide an Appropriate Benchmark for Port Hawkesbury's Crown Stumpage Purchases Comment 9: Land for MTAR Comment 10 Whether the NSUARB is an Authority Comment 11: Whether the Government Entrusted or Directed NSPI to Provide a Financial Contribution Comment 12: Whether to Use a Tier 1 Benchmark Comment 13: Whether the Port Hawkesbury LRR is based on Market Principles Comment 14: Whether Steam for LTAR Provides a Countervailable Subsidy Comment 15: Whether the Property Tax Reduction in Richmond County Provides a Countervailable Subsidy Comment 16: Whether the PWCC Indemnity Loan Program Should be Excluded from Port Hawkesbury's Cash Deposit Rate Comment 17: Whether to Apply AFA to Resolute Comment 18: Whether the Support for the Forest Industry Program (Investissement Qu[eacute]bec Loans) Provides Countervailable Subsidies to Resolute's SC Paper Production Comment 19: Whether Certain Programs Provides Countervailable Subsidies to Resolute's SC Paper Production Comment 20: Whether Subsidies are Extinguished by Changes in Ownership VIII. Conclusion Appendix I: Acronym and Abbreviation Table Appendix II: Litigation Table Appendix III: Administrative Determinations and Notices Table Appendix IV: Case-Related Documents Appendix V: Miscellaneous Table (Regulatory, Statutory, Articles, etc.) [FR Doc. 2015-26634 Filed 10-19-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Notices 63535
and the Trade Promotion Coordinating Senior Executive Service (SES) members Canada. The period of investigation is
Committee (TPCC). ETTAC was and (2) making recommendations to the January 1, 2014, through December 31,
originally chartered in May of 1994. It appointing authority on other 2014.
was most recently re-chartered until performance management issues, such DATES: Effective Date: October 20, 2015.
August 2016. as pay adjustments, bonuses and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: October 14, 2015. Presidential Rank Awards for SES Dana Mermelstein or David Neubacher,
Edward A. O’Malley, members. The appointment of these AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Office Director, Office of Energy and
members to the Performance Review Compliance, International Trade
Environmental Industries. Board will be for a period of twenty-four Administration, U.S. Department of
[FR Doc. 2015–26526 Filed 10–19–15; 8:45 am]
(24) months. Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DATES: The period of appointment for Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
those individuals selected for ITA’s telephone: (202) 482–1391 and (202)
Performance Review Board begins on 482–5823, respectively.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE October 20, 2015. The name, position SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
title, and type of appointment of each
International Trade Administration member of ITA’s Performance Review Background
Board are set forth below by The petitioner in this investigation is
Membership of the International Trade organization: the Coalition for Fair Paper Imports. The
Administration Performance Review Coalition for Fair Paper Imports is
Board Department of Commerce, International composed of Madison Paper Industries
Trade Administration (ITA)
AGENCY: International Trade and Verso Corporation. In addition to
Administration, Department of Praveen M. Dixit, Deputy Assistant the Government of Canada, the
Commerce. Secretary for Trade Policy and mandatory respondents in this
ACTION: Notice of membership on the Analysis, Career SES (New Member) investigation are (1) Port Hawkesbury
International Trade Administration’s Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Paper LP, 6879900 Canada Inc., Port
Performance Review Board. Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, Hawkesbury Investments Ltd., Port
Career SES (New Member) Hawkesbury Paper GP, Port Hawkesbury
SUMMARY: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. Jennifer L. Pilat, Director, Advocacy Paper Holdings Ltd., Port Hawkesbury
§ 4314(c)(4), the International Trade Center, Non-Career SES, Political Paper Inc., and Pacific West Commercial
Administration (ITA), Department of Advisor, (New Member) Corporation (collectively, Port
Commerce (DOC), announces the Timothy Rosado, Chief Financial and Hawkesbury); and (2) Resolute FP
appointment of those individuals who Administrative Officer, Career SES, Canada Inc., Fibrek General Partnership,
have been selected to serve as members Chairperson Forest Products Mauricie LP, Produits
of ITA’s Performance Review Board. Forestiers Petit-Paris Inc., and Société
The Performance Review Board is Department of Commerce, Office of the
en Commandite Scierie Opitciwan
responsible for (1) reviewing Secretary (OS), Office of the Chief
(collectively, Resolute).
performance appraisals and rating of Financial Officer and Assistant
Senior Executive Service (SES) members Secretary for Administration (CFO/ Case History
and (2) making recommendations to the ASA) The events that have occurred since
appointing authority on other Gay G. Shrum, Director for the Department published the
performance management issues, such Administrative Programs, Career SES Preliminary Determination 1 on August
as pay adjustments, bonuses and (New Member) 3, 2015, are discussed in the Issues and
Presidential Rank Awards for SES Decision Memorandum.2 The Issues and
members. The appointment of these Denise A. Yaag,
Decision Memorandum is a public
members to the Performance Review Director, Office of Executive Resources, Office document and is on file electronically
Board will be for a period of twenty-four of Human Resources Management, Office of
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
the Secretary/Office of the CFO/ASA,
(24) months. Department of Commerce. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
DATES: The period of appointment for Centralized Electronic Service System
[FR Doc. 2015–26576 Filed 10–19–15; 8:45 am]
those individuals selected for ITA’s (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Performance Review Board begins on registered users at https://
October 20, 2015. access.trade.gov, and is available to all
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE parties in the Central Records Unit,
Jennifer Munz, U.S. Department of room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce, Office of Human Resources International Trade Administration Commerce building. In addition, a
Management, Office of Executive complete version of the Issues and
[C–122–854]
Resources, 14th and Constitution
1 See Supercalendered Paper from Canada:
Avenue NW., Room 51010, Washington, Supercalendered Paper From Canada: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty
DC 20230, at (202) 482–4051. Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 80 FR 45951 (August 3, 2015)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In Determination (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 4314(c)(4), Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 2 See Memorandum from Gary Taverman,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the International Trade Administration
International Trade Administration, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
(ITA), Department of Commerce (DOC), Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
announces the appointment of those Department of Commerce. to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
individuals who have been selected to SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Enforcement and Compliance, regarding ‘‘Decision
serve as members of ITA’s Performance (the Department) determines that Memorandum for the Final Determination in the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Review Board. The Performance Review countervailable subsidies are being Supercalendered Paper from Canada,’’ dated
Board is responsible for (1) reviewing provided to producers and exporters of concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision
performance appraisals and rating of supercalendered paper (SC paper) from Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Oct 19, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM 20OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_63737/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Notices 63537
written description of the scope of the Comment 20: Whether Subsidies are Redetermination Pursuant to Court
investigation is dispositive. Extinguished by Changes in Ownership Remand, April 27, 2015, ECF No. 70’’
VIII. Conclusion (CVD Remand Redetermination), which
Appendix 2 Appendix I: Acronym and Abbreviation
dealt with the companion CWP
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Table
Appendix II: Litigation Table countervailing duty (CVD) proceeding.3
Decision Memorandum
Appendix III: Administrative Determinations In the CVD Remand Redetermination,
I. Summary the Department found ‘‘that there is no
and Notices Table
II. Background basis for making an adjustment to the
Appendix IV: Case-Related Documents
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Subsidies Valuation
Appendix V: Miscellaneous Table companion AD rates under’’ 19 U.S.C.
(Regulatory, Statutory, Articles, etc.) 1677f–1(f), because no party in the
a. Period of Investigation
b. Allocation Period [FR Doc. 2015–26634 Filed 10–19–15; 8:45 am] companion CVD proceeding responded
c. Attribution of Subsidies BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P to the Department’s request for
d. Denominators information concerning the issue of
e. Loan Interest Rate Benchmarks and ‘‘double remedies.’’
Discount Rates DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE In light of the CVD Remand
V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Redetermination, we have reconsidered
Adverse Inferences International Trade Administration our finding regarding the double
VI. Analysis of Programs
a. Programs Determined to be [Court No. 12–00296]
remedies adjustment afforded to
Countervailable respondents in the underlying AD
b. Programs Determined To Be Not Used or Final Redetermination Pursuant to proceeding, and found that there is no
Not to Confer a Benefit During the POI Court Remand, Wheatland Tube Co. v. basis for making an adjustment to the
c. Program Determined To Be Not United States AD rates under 19 U.S.C. 1677f–1(f). As
Countervailable such, in the draft redetermination, we
VII. Analysis of Comments Summary denied the adjustment that we granted
Comment 1: The Department’s Selection of the respondents in the Final
Mandatory and Voluntary Respondents On August 3, 2015, the U.S. Court of
Comment 2: The Calculation of the All International Trade (CIT or Court) Determination Memorandum.
Other’s Rate granted the request of the Department of The Department offered interested
Comment 3: Whether the Department Commerce (Department) for a voluntary parties an opportunity to comment on
Should Allow Irving to Post Bonds Until remand in the above-referenced the Draft Remand.4 On September 23,
the Final Results of an Expedited Review proceeding.1 The Remand Order 2015, Plaintiff Wheatland Tube
Comment 4: Whether Port Hawkesbury is involves a challenge to the Department’s Company (Wheatland) and Consolidated
Creditworthy Plaintiff United States Steel Corporation
Comment 5: Whether the GNS’ Hot Idle
final determination in a proceeding
conducted under Section 129 of the (U.S. Steel Corporation) submitted
Funding is Extinguished comments on the Draft Remand.5 In
Comment 6: Whether the GNS’ FIF Uruguay Round Agreements Act
Funding is Extinguished (Section 129) related to the their letter, they stated the following:
Comment 7: Whether Assistance Under the Department’s final affirmative We support the Department’s
Outreach Agreement is Countervailable antidumping duty (AD) determination determination to ‘‘deny { } the adjustment
Comment 8: Whether Port Hawkesbury’s on circular welded carbon quality steel that we granted respondents in the CWP AD
Private Stumpage Purchases Provide an pipe (CWP) from the People’s Republic Section 129 determination.’’ We have no
Appropriate Benchmark for Port other comments.6 (footnote omitted)
Hawkesbury’s Crown Stumpage
of China (PRC) for the period October 1,
Purchases 2006, through March 31, 2007.2 No other interested party submitted
Comment 9: Land for MTAR The CIT granted the Department’s comments.
Comment 10 Whether the NSUARB is an request for a voluntary remand ‘‘in light For the reasons discussed below, our
Authority of Commerce’s remand redetermination Draft Remand remains unchanged, and
Comment 11: Whether the Government in Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, we continue to deny the adjustment that
Entrusted or Directed NSPI to Provide a Consol. Court No. 12–00298, we granted the respondents in the Final
Financial Contribution Determination Memorandum.
Comment 12: Whether to Use a Tier 1 1 See Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, Court
Benchmark Background
No. 12–00296 (August 3, 2015) (Remand Order).
Comment 13: Whether the Port
Hawkesbury LRR is based on Market
2 See Implementation of Determinations Under
Section 129 Proceeding
Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act:
Principles Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires; Circular On July 22, 2008, upon final
Comment 14: Whether Steam for LTAR Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe; Laminated affirmative determinations by the
Provides a Countervailable Subsidy Woven Sacks; and Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe Department and the U.S. International
Comment 15: Whether the Property Tax and Tube From the People’s Republic of China, 77
FR 52683 (August 30, 2012) (Implementation Trade Commission, the Department
Reduction in Richmond County Provides
a Countervailable Subsidy Notice); See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, published AD and CVD orders on CWP
Comment 16: Whether the PWCC Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and from the PRC.7 The Government of the
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Indemnity Loan Program Should be Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 3 See Remand Order.
Excluded from Port Hawkesbury’s Cash Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Final 4 See ‘‘Draft Remand Redetermination, Wheatland
Deposit Rate Determination: Section 129 Proceeding Pursuant to
Comment 17: Whether to Apply AFA to the WTO Appellate Body’s Findings in WTO DS379 Tube Co. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 12–
Resolute Regarding the Antidumping and Countervailing 00296,’’ (September 18, 2015) (Draft Remand).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
5 See Letter from the Domestic Interested Parties
Comment 18: Whether the Support for the Duty Investigations of Circular Welded Carbon
Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s Republic of to the Department, ‘‘Comments On The Draft
Forest Industry Program (Investissement Remand Redetermination, Wheatland Tube Co. v.
Québec Loans) Provides Countervailable China,’’ (July 31, 2012) (Final Determination
Memorandum); see also Notice of Final United States, Court No. 12–00296’’ (September 23,
Subsidies to Resolute’s SC Paper 2015).
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Production Affirmative Final Determination of Critical 6 Id. at 1.
Comment 19: Whether Certain Programs Circumstances: Circular Welded Carbon Quality 7 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Circular
Provides Countervailable Subsidies to Steel Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, 73 Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s
Resolute’s SC Paper Production FR 31970 (June 5, 2008) (Final Determination). Republic of China, 73 FR 42547 (July 22, 2008).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Oct 19, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM 20OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_63737/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 15:25:59
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 15:25:59
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Dana Mermelstein or David Neubacher, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1391 and (202) 482-5823, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 63535 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR