80 FR 63580 - Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge, AL
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 202 (October 20, 2015)
Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 202 (October 20, 2015)
| Page Range | 63580-63583 | |
| FR Document | 2015-26614 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 202 (Tuesday, October 20, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 63580-63583] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-26614] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS-R4-R-2015-N056: FXRS12650400000S3-123-FF04R02000] Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge, AL AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan and environmental assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in Bibb County, Alabama for public review and comment. In this Draft CCP/EA, we describe the alternative we propose to use to manage this refuge for the 15 years following approval of the Final CCP. DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments by November 19, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of the Draft CCP/EA by downloading the document from our Internet Site at http://fws.gov/southeast/planning/PDFdocuments/cahaba-river-draft-ccp.pdf. Comments on the Draft CCP/EA may also be submitted to Sarah Clardy-Draft CCP Comments at P.O. Box 5087, Anniston, AL 36205 or by email to: [email protected]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sarah Clardy, Refuge Manager, Cahaba River NWR, P.O. Box 5087, Anniston, AL 36205; or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Introduction With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Cahaba River NWR started through a notice in the Federal Register on Tuesday, November 13, 2012 (77 FR 27526). For more about the refuge and our CCP process, please see that notice. Cahaba River NWR was established in 2002 under the authority of the Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge Establishment Act, Public Law 106-331, dated October 19, 2000. This legislation directed the Secretary of the Interior to acquire up to 3,500 acres of lands and waters to establish the refuge. In 2004, the Regional Director of the Service (Southeast Region) authorized the expansion of the acquisition boundary of the refuge to include an additional 340 acres of property at the confluence of the Cahaba and Little Cahaba Rivers. In 2006, Pub. Law 109-363 was signed by the President, authorizing further expansion of the acquisition boundary by 3,600 acres. In 2008, the Regional Director authorized a 360-acre expansion of the acquisition boundary. As of 2015, the refuge has an approved acquisition boundary of 7,784 acres of which 3,689.63 acres have been acquired in fee-title in Bibb County. The refuge was established to: (1) Conserve, enhance, and restore the native aquatic and terrestrial community characteristics of the Cahaba River (including associated fish, wildlife, and plant species); (2) conserve, enhance, and restore habitat to maintain and assist in the recovery of plants and animals that are listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973; (3) provide opportunities for compatible wildlife- dependent recreation; and (4) [[Page 63581]] facilitate partnerships among the Service, local communities, conservation organizations, and other non-Federal entities to encourage participation in the conservation of the refuge's resources. Background The CCP Process The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with the Administration Act. Priority resource issues addressed in the Draft CCP/EA include: Fish and Wildlife Populations, Habitat Management, Resource Protections, Visitor Services, and Refuge Administration. CCP Alternatives, Including Our Proposed Alternative We developed three alternatives for managing the refuge (Alternatives A, B, and C), with Alternative B as our proposed alternative. A full description of each alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We summarize each alternative below. Alternative A: Current Management--No Action Wildlife and Habitat Management There would be no management of riverine and Cahaba lily/water willow shoals habitats and exotic aquatic plants and Beaver Pond would not be managed. There would be no management of the following habitats: Beech, oak, laurel and azalea forest; Cahaba riverwash herbaceous vegetation; canebrake; oak, beech and sedge forest; oak, hickory, and iris forest; oak, holly, and sparkleberry forest; and tuliptree and sensitive fern forest. For interior longleaf pine woodland and longleaf pine plantations, prescribed fire would be applied to approximately 250 acres every few years to help reduce encroachment of hardwoods and support a more diverse groundcover. No management of planted loblolly pine stands to restore to longleaf pine historically found in the watershed would occur. There would be no management of invasive or exotic species within the refuge boundaries. Genetic and population monitoring of Georgia aster that began in 2012 by the Atlanta Botanical Garden will continue. Ecological Services (FWS) would monitor and provide recommendations for management opportunities for Georgia rockcress or glades, however there would be no management implemented. There would be no active management by the refuge of federally- listed fish, mussels, and snails, with the exception of management via communication and education with local landowners about sedimentation and nutrient loading of aquatic habitats and providing sediment control through regular road maintenance of River Trace Road. Additionally, we would coordinate access to potential aquatic animal release sites by the State or other partners for reintroduction purposes. With the exception of occasional surveys and periodic management activities in select pine-dominated forest stands, no additional management would likely be conducted for migratory birds. For the endangered gray bat, surveys would be conducted sporadically. Visitor Services All hunting, fishing, environmental education, interpretation, wildlife observation, and wildlife photography opportunities would remain the same. Canoeing and kayaking would continue to occur on the refuge. The concrete basin used to launch boats upstream of the refuge would not be replaced if damaged. Resource Protection Several water resource management activities would likely continue. Currently, four water quality monitoring points are sampled quarterly (testing for heavy metals) as part of mine reclamation efforts. Testing would continue to occur from 2013 through 2015. In terms of protecting lands, the refuge would continue to explore conservation options with only willing landowners within acquisition boundary as funding and opportunities arise. These could include fee-title purchases or less- than-fee options, such as easement purchases, management agreements, etc. Currently, there are no known cultural resources, and a comprehensive assessment would probably not be conducted. However, if sites are identified, the refuge will ensure cultural resource management and protection strategies are implemented. Refuge Administration The refuge manager would continue to be stationed in Anniston, AL, with oversight duties also including Mountain Longleaf and Watercress Darter NWRs. A deputy manager position would likely not be filled. The zone officer would continue to conduct periodic law enforcement patrols and respond to reported incidents on the refuge. On an as-needed basis, work crews from Wheeler NWR and possibly other refuges would periodically maintain and repair roads and unpaved parking areas, replace culverts, and maintain boundary markers. The refuge would solicit the help of volunteers to assist with maintenance of trails and repairing benches, etc. No facilities would be built on or near the refuge under this alternative. The refuge would continue relationships with current partners to expand the refuge's capacity to protect and monitor biological resources, implement habitat improvement projects, enhance interaction and education of refuge visitors through on and off site events and encourage cooperative programs with academic institutions and nongovernmental organizations Alternative B: Expand Habitat and Wildlife Management (Proposed Alternative) Wildlife and Habitat Management The refuge would monitor the health and distribution of the Cahaba Lily population and work to educate the public about the fragility of these habitats to human disturbance. We would chemically control alligator weed on an annual basis. The refuge would re-inventory and create maps for the following habitats: Beech, oak, laurel and azalea forest; Cahaba riverwash herbaceous vegetation; canebrake; oak, beech and sedge forest; oak, hickory, and iris forest; oak, holly, and sparkleberry forest; and tuliptree and sensitive fern forest. The refuge would work to re- establish viable canebrake communities. For interior longleaf pine woodland; loblolly pine plantation; and longleaf [[Page 63582]] pine plantation we would designate stand conditions for restoration purposes and reestablish a recurring fire regime. Surveys would be conducted to determine if glades habitat exists with the refuge boundary. The refuge would implement control measures and monitoring of invasive plant species (Chinese Privet, Alligator Weed, Kudzu, Mimosa, etc.) as appropriate. For Georgia aster, we would work with partners to conduct additional surveys and create a GIS database to map Georgia aster distribution. We would work with partners to continue surveys for Georgia rockcress and implement management strategies (including timber management and invasive species removal) to increase population size and the number of locations. The refuge would develop an educational program and evaluate overutilization of recreational use on the refuge and restore stream habitat that potentially impacts federally-listed mussels, snails, and fish. We would also work with partners to identify and provide access for reintroductions of these species. For neotropical migratory birds, we would resume biotic inventories utilizing refuge staff, local universities and partners. Habitats would be restored for focal species where appropriate. In addition, use of prescribed fire would be utilized to improve conditions for focal species that are dependent upon pine-dominated habitats. The refuge would inventory and monitor for gray bats, bald eagles, and other surrogate species. Visitor Services Opportunities for wildlife observation, wildlife photography, environmental education, and interpretation would be expanded. The refuge would maintain bicycle riding opportunities and the current launch site for canoeing and kayaking. Resource Protection The refuge would participate as stakeholder on regional water quality improvement efforts within the upper Cahaba Basin; work to improve water quality of refuge tributary streams through partnerships with adjacent land owners; and establish cooperative programs and partnerships with the University of Alabama for lands along the western refuge boundary. The refuge would also install a stream gage within the refuge boundary. Testing would continue to occur on four water quality monitoring points as part of mine reclamation efforts. We would work with partners to identify and provide assistance to landowners to conserve priority lands within the Cahaba River watershed by providing long term protection of valued resources within the watershed. The refuge would work with the regional archaeologist to complete a comprehensive historical and archaeological resource survey. Refuge Administration Seven additional complex staff would be needed to carry out the proposed projects. These positions include: An assistant refuge manager, biologist, equipment operator, park ranger, forester, law enforcement officer and biological technician. The refuge would improve River Trace Road (e.g. install low water crossings and culverts, improve road surface, etc.), protect the River Trace Road from erosion (undercutting by river), and improve Belcher Road through regular maintenance. No facilities would be built on or near the refuge however, a new complex office and maintenance shop would be constructed in Anniston, AL. The refuge would train volunteers to conduct interpretive programs (emphasizing the need for wildlife and habitat and wildlife management) and implement projects (interpretive signs, invasive species control, biological monitoring, etc.). The volunteer program would be expanded to include an Americorp team. Alternative C: Emphasize Natural and Primitive Processes Wildlife and Habitat Management Management of riverine and Cahaba lily/water willow shoals habitats would remain the same as Alternative A. For Beaver Pond, we would evaluate feasibility for restoring its natural hydrology. There would be no change in management for the following habitats: Beech, oak, laurel and azalea forest; Cahaba riverwash herbaceous vegetation; canebrake; oak, beech and sedge forest; oak, hickory, and iris forest; oak, holly, and sparkleberry forest; and tuliptree and sensitive fern forest. We would replace planted loblolly pine plantation stands, with longleaf pine, on an opportunistic basis. For interior longleaf pine woodland and longleaf pine plantation, we would use prescribed fire only to minimize threat of wildfire. There would be no surveys conducted for glades and no active management for Georgia aster. Management for federally listed aquatic species, neotropical migratory birds, gray bat, bald eagle, and other surrogate species would be the same as under Alternative B. Visitor Services River Trace Road would be closed to motor vehicles and converted to a trail. We would work with partners to develop and present educational programs that emphasize the role of natural ecological processes in shaping wildlife habitats. We would develop interpretive materials and messages that emphasize the role of natural and primitive processes in shaping wildlife habitats. We would remove the concrete basin that is used to launch canoes and kayaks. Resource Protection For water quality, management would be similar to Alternative B, but we would also ensure that mine tailings do not contaminate groundwater through removal or other means. We would restore the natural hydrology on the refuge in areas where there is the greatest need. Land protection efforts would focus on tracts within the acquisition boundary based on their potential role in creating a more connected and functional ecosystem. Refuge Administration Under this alternative, the following three additional staff would be required: Biologist, biological technician, and equipment operator. We would evaluate which road-side ditches and culverts would need to be altered to restore the former hydrology and reduce sedimentation. No facilities would be leased, acquired, or built under this alternative. Volunteers and Other Partnerships We would offer our volunteers training to conduct interpretive programs that emphasize the role of natural and primitive processes in shaping wildlife habitat. Next Step After the comment period ends, we will analyze the comments and address them in the Final CCP. Public Availability of Comments Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying [[Page 63583]] information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Authority This notice is published under the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.). Dated: October 14, 2015. Richard P. Ingram, Acting Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System. [FR Doc. 2015-26614 Filed 10-19-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
![63580 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Notices
directed to the OMB USCIS Desk Officer Overview of This Information in Bibb County, Alabama for public
via email at oira_submission@ Collection review and comment. In this Draft CCP/
omb.eop.gov. Comments may also be (1) Type of Information Collection EA, we describe the alternative we
submitted via fax at (202) 395–5806. All Request: Revision of a Currently propose to use to manage this refuge for
submissions received must include the Approved Collection. the 15 years following approval of the
agency name and the OMB Control (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Final CCP.
Number 1615–0034. Notice of Appeal of Decision Under DATES: To ensure consideration, we
You may wish to consider limiting the Section 210 or 245A. must receive your written comments by
amount of personal information that you (3) Agency form number, if any, and November 19, 2015.
provide in any voluntary submission the applicable component of the DHS ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
you make. For additional information sponsoring the collection: Form I–694; the Draft CCP/EA by downloading the
please read the Privacy Act notice that USCIS. document from our Internet Site at
is available via the link in the footer of (4) Affected public who will be asked http://fws.gov/southeast/planning/PDF
http://www.regulations.gov. or required to respond, as well as a brief documents/cahaba-river-draft-ccp.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFOMRATION CONTACT: abstract: Primary: Individuals or Comments on the Draft CCP/EA may
USCIS, Office of Policy and Strategy, households. USCIS uses the information also be submitted to Sarah Clardy-Draft
Regulatory Coordination Division, Laura provided on Form I–694 in considering CCP Comments at P.O. Box 5087,
Dawkins, Chief, 20 Massachusetts the appeal from a finding that an Anniston, AL 36205 or by email to:
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529– applicant is ineligible for legalization cahabariverccp@fws.gov.
2140, Telephone number (202) 272– under section 210 and 245A of the Act FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
8377 (comments are not accepted via or is ineligible for a related waiver of Sarah Clardy, Refuge Manager, Cahaba
telephone message). Please note contact inadmissibility. River NWR, P.O. Box 5087, Anniston,
information provided here is solely for (5) An estimate of the total number of AL 36205; or cahabariverccp@fws.gov.
questions regarding this notice. It is not respondents and the amount of time SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
for individual case status inquiries. estimated for an average respondent to
Applicants seeking information about respond: The estimated total number of Introduction
the status of their individual cases can respondents for the information With this notice, we continue the CCP
check Case Status Online, available at collection Form I–694 is 50 and the process for Cahaba River NWR started
the USCIS Web site at http:// estimated hour burden per response is through a notice in the Federal Register
www.uscis.gov, or call the USCIS 1.5 hours. on Tuesday, November 13, 2012 (77 FR
National Customer Service Center at (6) An estimate of the total public 27526). For more about the refuge and
(800) 375–5283; TTY (800) 767–1833. burden (in hours) associated with the our CCP process, please see that notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: collection: The total estimated annual Cahaba River NWR was established in
hour burden associated with this 2002 under the authority of the Cahaba
Comments collection is 75 hours. River National Wildlife Refuge
You may access the information (7) An estimate of the total public Establishment Act, Public Law 106–331,
collection instrument with instructions, burden (in cost) associated with the dated October 19, 2000. This legislation
or additional information by visiting the collection: $6,312.50. directed the Secretary of the Interior to
Federal eRulemaking Portal site at: Dated: October 14, 2015. acquire up to 3,500 acres of lands and
http://www.regulations.gov and enter Laura Dawkins,
waters to establish the refuge. In 2004,
USCIS–2007–0034 in the search box. the Regional Director of the Service
Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division,
Written comments and suggestions from Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship
(Southeast Region) authorized the
the public and affected agencies should and Immigration Services, Department of expansion of the acquisition boundary
address one or more of the following Homeland Security. of the refuge to include an additional
four points: [FR Doc. 2015–26531 Filed 10–19–15; 8:45 am] 340 acres of property at the confluence
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
of the Cahaba and Little Cahaba Rivers.
collection of information is necessary In 2006, Pub. Law 109–363 was signed
for the proper performance of the by the President, authorizing further
functions of the agency, including expansion of the acquisition boundary
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
whether the information will have by 3,600 acres. In 2008, the Regional
practical utility; Fish and Wildlife Service Director authorized a 360-acre
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the expansion of the acquisition boundary.
agency’s estimate of the burden of the [FWS–R4–R–2015–N056: As of 2015, the refuge has an approved
proposed collection of information, FXRS12650400000S3–123–FF04R02000] acquisition boundary of 7,784 acres of
including the validity of the which 3,689.63 acres have been
Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge,
methodology and assumptions used; acquired in fee-title in Bibb County.
AL
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and The refuge was established to: (1)
clarity of the information to be AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Conserve, enhance, and restore the
collected; and Interior. native aquatic and terrestrial
(4) Minimize the burden of the ACTION: Notice of availability; request community characteristics of the Cahaba
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
collection of information on those who for comments. River (including associated fish,
are to respond, including through the wildlife, and plant species); (2)
use of appropriate automated, SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and conserve, enhance, and restore habitat
electronic, mechanical, or other Wildlife Service (Service), announce the to maintain and assist in the recovery of
technological collection techniques or availability of a draft comprehensive plants and animals that are listed under
other forms of information technology, conservation plan and environmental the Endangered Species Act of 1973; (3)
e.g., permitting electronic submission of assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Cahaba provide opportunities for compatible
responses. River National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) wildlife-dependent recreation; and (4)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Oct 19, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM 20OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_63782/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Notices 63583
information from public review, we Resolution No. T–117–12, dated July 5, SUMMARY: History Colorado, formerly
cannot guarantee that we will be able to 2012, in which the Yakama Nation Colorado Historical Society, has
do so. requested that the State of Washington completed an inventory of human
retrocede partial civil and criminal remains, in consultation with the
Authority
jurisdiction to the Tribe. appropriate Indian tribes or Native
This notice is published under the Dated: October 14, 2015. Hawaiian organizations, and has
authority of the National Wildlife determined that there is no cultural
Kevin K. Washburn,
Refuge System Improvement Act of affiliation between the human remains
1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.). Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
and any present-day Indian tribes or
[FR Doc. 2015–26620 Filed 10–19–15; 8:45 am] Native Hawaiian organizations.
Dated: October 14, 2015.
Richard P. Ingram,
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P Representatives of any Indian tribe or
Acting Regional Chief, National Wildlife
Native Hawaiian organization not
Refuge System. identified in this notice that wish to
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR request transfer of control of these
[FR Doc. 2015–26614 Filed 10–19–15; 8:45 am]
Bureau of Land Management human remains should submit a written
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
request to History Colorado. If no
[LLWO210000.16X.L11100000.PH0000 additional requestors come forward,
LXSISGST0000] transfer of control of the human remains
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
to the Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian
Notice of Proposed Withdrawal; organizations stated in this notice may
Bureau of Indian Affairs Sagebrush Focal Areas; Idaho, proceed.
[156A2100DD/AAKC001030/ Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and
DATES: Representatives of any Indian
A0A501010.999900 253G] Wyoming and Notice of Intent To
Prepare an Environmental Impact tribe or Native Hawaiian organization
Acceptance of Retrocession of Statement not identified in this notice that wish to
Jurisdiction for the Yakama Nation request transfer of control of these
Correction human remains should submit a written
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, request with information in support of
Interior. AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior. the request to History Colorado at the
ACTION: Notice. address in this notice by November 19,
ACTION: Correction Notice.
2015.
SUMMARY: The Department of Interior
SUMMARY: This action corrects the ADDRESSES: Sheila Goff, NAGPRA
(Department) has accepted retrocession
to the United States of partial civil and language found in the SUPPLEMENTARY Liaison, History Colorado, 1200
criminal jurisdiction over the Yakama INFORMATION section of a notice Broadway, Denver, CO 80203, telephone
Nation from the State of Washington. published in the Federal Register on (303) 866–4531, email sheila.goff@
Thursday, September 24, 2015 (80 FR state.co.us.
DATES: The Department accepted
retrocession on October 19, 2015. 57635 to 57637). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
Complete implementation of On page 57636, column 2, beginning here given in accordance with the
jurisdiction will be effective April 19, on line 9, the text which reads ‘‘The Native American Graves Protection and
2016. Sagebrush Focal Areas include all Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C.
public and National Forest System lands 3003, of the completion of an inventory
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. identified in the townships below:’’, is of human remains under the control of
Darren Cruzan, Deputy Director—Office hereby corrected to read, ‘‘The History Colorado, Denver, CO.
of Justice Services, Bureau of Indian Sagebrush Focal Areas consist of those This notice is published as part of the
Affairs, (202) 208–5787. public and National Forest System lands National Park Service’s administrative
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the within the townships below that are responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
authority of 25 U.S.C. 1323, vested in identified as Sagebrush Focal Areas on U.S.C. 3003(d)(3) and 43 CFR 10.11(d).
the Secretary of the Interior by the map posted on the BLM Web site at The determinations in this notice are
Executive Order No. 11435 of November http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/ the sole responsibility of the museum,
21, 1968, 33 FR 17339, and re-delegated more/sagegrouse.html:’’ institution, or Federal agency that has
to the Assistant Secretary—Indian control of the Native American human
Steven A. Ellis,
Affairs, the United States accepts partial remains. The National Park Service is
civil and criminal jurisdiction over the Deputy Director, Operations.
not responsible for the determinations
Yakama Nation which was acquired by [FR Doc. 2015–26633 Filed 10–19–15; 8:45 am]
in this notice.
the State of Washington, under Public BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
Law 83–280, 67 Stat. 588, codified as Consultation
amended at 18 U.S.C. 1162, 28 U.S.C. A detailed assessment of the human
1360, and as provided in Revised Code DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR remains was made by History Colorado
of Washington 37.12.010, 37.12.021, professional staff in consultation with
National Park Service representatives of the Arapaho Tribe of
37.12.030, 37.12.040, and 37.12.060
(1963), and 37.12.050 (1957). [NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–19337: the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming;
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
This retrocession was offered by the PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000] Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes,
State of Washington in Proclamation by Oklahoma (previously listed as the
the Governor 14–01, signed on January Notice of Inventory Completion: Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of
17, 2014, and transmitted to the History Colorado, Formerly Colorado Oklahoma); Comanche Nation,
Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs in Historical Society, Denver, CO Oklahoma; Fort Sill Apache Tribe of
accordance with the process in Revised AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Oklahoma; Jicarilla Apache Nation, New
Code of Washington 37.12.160 (2012), Mexico; Kiowa Indian Tribe of
ACTION: Notice.
and as provided by Tribal Council Oklahoma; Mescalero Apache Tribe of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Oct 19, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM 20OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_63782/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 15:25:43
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 15:25:43
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of availability; request for comments. | |
| Dates | To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments by November 19, 2015. | |
| Contact | Ms. Sarah Clardy, Refuge Manager, Cahaba River NWR, P.O. Box 5087, Anniston, AL 36205; or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 63580 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR