80_FR_64242 80 FR 64038 - Sunshine Act Meeting

80 FR 64038 - Sunshine Act Meeting

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 204 (October 22, 2015)

Page Range64038-64038
FR Document2015-26972

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 204 (Thursday, October 22, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 204 (Thursday, October 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 64038]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26972]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Monday, October 
26, 2015, at 1:00 p.m., in the Auditorium (L-002) at the Commission's 
headquarters building, to hear oral argument in an appeal from an 
initial decision of an administrative law judge by Respondents ZPR 
Investment Management, Inc. (``ZPRIM''), and Max E. Zavanelli 
(``Zavanelli'').
    On May 27, 2014, the law judge found that ZPRIM violated Sections 
206(1), (2), and (4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and 
Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-1(a)(5), by misrepresenting compliance with 
the Global Investment Performance Standards (``GIPS'') in magazine 
advertisements and investment report newsletters. The initial decision 
also found that Zavanelli aided, abetted, and caused, and was primarily 
liable under Sections 206(1) and (2) for, each of ZPRIM's violations 
based on these misrepresentations.
    In addition, the law judge found that ZPRIM violated Sections 
206(2) and (4) and Rule 206(4)-1(a)(5) by negligently claiming in a 
Morningstar report for the period ended September 30, 2010 that (a) an 
independent third party had verified ZPRIM's compliance with GIPS ``to 
the present,'' and (b) ZPRIM was not under Commission investigation, 
although neither of these things was true. The law judge also found 
that ZPRIM violated Sections 206(1), (2), and (4) and Rule 206(4)-
1(a)(5) by repeating its false claim that it was not under Commission 
investigation in a Morningstar report for the period ended March 31, 
2011. The initial decision found that Zavanelli caused each of ZPRIM's 
Morningstar violations but did not aid and abet them.
    For these violations, the law judge barred Zavanelli from 
association with any investment adviser, broker, dealer, municipal 
securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally 
recognized statistical rating organization; ordered ZPRIM to cease and 
desist from committing, and Zavanelli to cease and desist from 
committing, aiding, abetting, or causing the commission of, any 
violations or future violations of Advisers Act Sections 206(1), (2), 
and (4) and Rule 206(4)-1(a)(5); and imposed civil money penalties of 
$250,000 on ZPRIM and $660,000 on Zavanelli.
    Respondents appealed the initial decision's findings of violation 
and the sanctions imposed. The issues likely to be considered at oral 
argument include, among other things, whether Respondents violated the 
antifraud provisions as alleged and, if so, what sanction, if any, is 
appropriate in the public interest.
    For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: October 19, 2015.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-26972 Filed 10-20-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                              64038                           Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 204 / Thursday, October 22, 2015 / Notices

                                              order flow to competing venues. In such                    All submissions should refer to File                     On May 27, 2014, the law judge found
                                              an environment, the Exchange must                          Number SR–ISE–2015–32. This file                      that ZPRIM violated Sections 206(1), (2),
                                              continually review, and consider                           number should be included on the                      and (4) of the Investment Advisers Act
                                              adjusting, its fees to remain competitive                  subject line if email is used. To help the            of 1940 and Advisers Act Rule 206(4)–
                                              with other exchanges. For the reasons                      Commission process and review your                    1(a)(5), by misrepresenting compliance
                                              described above, the Exchange believes                     comments more efficiently, please use                 with the Global Investment Performance
                                              that the proposed fee change reflects                      only one method. The Commission will                  Standards (‘‘GIPS’’) in magazine
                                              this competitive environment.                              post all comments on the Commission’s                 advertisements and investment report
                                                                                                         Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/                newsletters. The initial decision also
                                              C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                                                                         rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the                       found that Zavanelli aided, abetted, and
                                              Statement on Comments on the
                                                                                                         submission, all subsequent                            caused, and was primarily liable under
                                              Proposed Rule Change Received From
                                                                                                         amendments, all written statements                    Sections 206(1) and (2) for, each of
                                              Members, Participants or Others
                                                                                                         with respect to the proposed rule                     ZPRIM’s violations based on these
                                                The Exchange has not solicited, and                      change that are filed with the                        misrepresentations.
                                              does not intend to solicit, comments on                    Commission, and all written                              In addition, the law judge found that
                                              this proposed rule change. The                             communications relating to the                        ZPRIM violated Sections 206(2) and (4)
                                              Exchange has not received any                              proposed rule change between the                      and Rule 206(4)–1(a)(5) by negligently
                                              unsolicited written comments from                          Commission and any person, other than                 claiming in a Morningstar report for the
                                              members or other interested parties.                       those that may be withheld from the                   period ended September 30, 2010 that
                                              III. Date of Effectiveness of the                          public in accordance with the                         (a) an independent third party had
                                              Proposed Rule Change and Timing for                        provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be                   verified ZPRIM’s compliance with GIPS
                                              Commission Action                                          available for Web site viewing and                    ‘‘to the present,’’ and (b) ZPRIM was not
                                                                                                         printing in the Commission’s Public                   under Commission investigation,
                                                 The foregoing rule change has become                    Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,                     although neither of these things was
                                              effective pursuant to Section                              Washington, DC 20549 on official                      true. The law judge also found that
                                              19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,9 and                           business days between the hours of                    ZPRIM violated Sections 206(1), (2), and
                                              subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4                          10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such               (4) and Rule 206(4)–1(a)(5) by repeating
                                              thereunder,10 because it establishes a                     filing also will be available for                     its false claim that it was not under
                                              due, fee, or other charge imposed by                       inspection and copying at the principal               Commission investigation in a
                                              ISE.                                                       office of the Exchange. All comments                  Morningstar report for the period ended
                                                 At any time within 60 days of the                       received will be posted without change;               March 31, 2011. The initial decision
                                              filing of such proposed rule change, the                   the Commission does not edit personal                 found that Zavanelli caused each of
                                              Commission summarily may                                   identifying information from                          ZPRIM’s Morningstar violations but did
                                              temporarily suspend such rule change if                    submissions. You should submit only                   not aid and abet them.
                                              it appears to the Commission that such                     information that you wish to make                        For these violations, the law judge
                                              action is necessary or appropriate in the                  available publicly. All submissions                   barred Zavanelli from association with
                                              public interest, for the protection of                     should refer to File Number SR–ISE–                   any investment adviser, broker, dealer,
                                              investors, or otherwise in furtherance of                  2015–32 and should be submitted by                    municipal securities dealer, municipal
                                              the purposes of the Act. If the                            November 12, 2015.                                    advisor, transfer agent, or nationally
                                              Commission takes such action, the
                                                                                                           For the Commission, by the Division of              recognized statistical rating
                                              Commission shall institute proceedings
                                                                                                         Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated            organization; ordered ZPRIM to cease
                                              to determine whether the proposed rule                     authority.11                                          and desist from committing, and
                                              should be approved or disapproved.
                                                                                                         Brent J. Fields,                                      Zavanelli to cease and desist from
                                              IV. Solicitation of Comments                               Secretary.                                            committing, aiding, abetting, or causing
                                                Interested persons are invited to                        [FR Doc. 2015–26806 Filed 10–21–15; 8:45 am]          the commission of, any violations or
                                              submit written data, views, and                            BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                future violations of Advisers Act
                                              arguments concerning the foregoing,                                                                              Sections 206(1), (2), and (4) and Rule
                                              including whether the proposed rule                                                                              206(4)–1(a)(5); and imposed civil money
                                              change is consistent with the Act.                         SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                               penalties of $250,000 on ZPRIM and
                                              Comments may be submitted by any of                        COMMISSION                                            $660,000 on Zavanelli.
                                              the following methods:                                                                                              Respondents appealed the initial
                                                                                                         Sunshine Act Meeting                                  decision’s findings of violation and the
                                              Electronic Comments                                                                                              sanctions imposed. The issues likely to
                                                • Use the Commission’s Internet                            Notice is hereby given, pursuant to                 be considered at oral argument include,
                                              comment form (http://www.sec.gov/                          the provisions of the Government in the               among other things, whether
                                              rules/sro.shtml); or                                       Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that                 Respondents violated the antifraud
                                                • Send an email to rule-comments@                        the Securities and Exchange                           provisions as alleged and, if so, what
                                              sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–ISE–                   Commission will hold an Open Meeting                  sanction, if any, is appropriate in the
                                              2015–32 on the subject line.                               on Monday, October 26, 2015, at 1:00                  public interest.
                                                                                                         p.m., in the Auditorium (L–002) at the                   For further information, please
                                              Paper Comments                                             Commission’s headquarters building, to                contact the Office of the Secretary at
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                • Send paper comments in triplicate                      hear oral argument in an appeal from an               (202) 551–5400.
                                              to Secretary, Securities and Exchange                      initial decision of an administrative law
                                                                                                         judge by Respondents ZPR Investment                     Dated: October 19, 2015.
                                              Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
                                                                                                         Management, Inc. (‘‘ZPRIM’’), and Max                 Brent J. Fields,
                                              Washington, DC 20549–1090.
                                                                                                         E. Zavanelli (‘‘Zavanelli’’).                         Secretary.
                                                9 15   U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).                                                                                [FR Doc. 2015–26972 Filed 10–20–15; 11:15 am]
                                                10 17   CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).                               11 17   CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).                        BILLING CODE 8011–01–P




                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014      18:05 Oct 21, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00082   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM   22OCN1



Document Created: 2015-12-14 15:34:09
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 15:34:09
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation80 FR 64038 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR