80 FR 67302 - Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines; Coordination of the Scheduling Processes of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines and Public Utilities
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 211 (November 2, 2015)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 211 (November 2, 2015)
| Page Range | 67302-67312 | |
| FR Document | 2015-27806 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 211 (Monday, November 2, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 67302-67312] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-27806] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 18 CFR Parts 157, 260, and 284 [Docket Nos. RM96-1-038 and RM14-2-003; Order No. 587-W] Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines; Coordination of the Scheduling Processes of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines and Public Utilities AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is amending its regulations to incorporate by reference the latest version (Version 3.0) of seven business practice standards adopted by the Wholesale Gas Quadrant of the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) applicable to interstate natural gas pipelines. These updated business practice standards contain and supplement the revisions to the NAESB scheduling standards accepted by the Commission in Order No. 809 as part of the Commission's efforts to harmonize gas-electric scheduling coordination, and are required to be implemented on April 1, 2016, the same date as the regulations adopted in Order No. 809. In addition, the updated standards revise [[Page 67303]] the codes used to identify receipt and delivery locations in the Index of Customers. Further, for consistency with the revisions to the Index of Customers, the Commission is also amending its regulations to make conforming changes to the Commission's regulations on interstate natural gas pipeline filings and postings. DATES: This rule will become effective December 2, 2015. Implementation of these standards is required on April 1, 2016. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of December 2, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Wolf (technical issues), Office of Energy Policy and Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-6841, Email: [email protected]. Oscar F. Santillana (technical issues), Office of Energy Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-6392,Email: [email protected]. Gary D. Cohen (legal issues), Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-8321,Email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Order No. 587-W Final Rule Table of Contents Paragraph Numbers I. Background............................................... 4 II. Discussion.............................................. 12 A. Incorporation by Reference of the NAESB Standards.... 12 1. The NAESB WGQ Version 3.0 Business Practice 12 Standards.......................................... 2. NAESB's Process.................................. 14 3. NOPR Proposal.................................... 15 4. Comments......................................... 16 5. Commission Determination......................... 17 6. Required Compliance Filings...................... 18 B. Use of Proprietary Codes To Replace Common Codes..... 19 1. NOPR Proposal.................................... 19 2. Comments......................................... 21 3. Commission Determination......................... 22 C. Index of Customers................................... 24 1. Filing Format.................................... 24 a. NOPR Proposal................................ 24 b. Comment...................................... 25 c. Commission Determination..................... 26 2. Index of Customers Instruction Manual............ 27 a. NOPR Proposal................................ 27 b. Comments..................................... 28 c. Commission Determination..................... 31 D. Cross-References/Conforming Changes.................. 36 1. NOPR Proposal.................................... 36 2. Comments......................................... 37 3. Commission Determination......................... 38 III. Implementation Schedule................................ 40 IV. Notice of Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards.......... 43 V. Incorporation By Reference............................... 45 VI. Information Collection Statement........................ 47 VII. Environmental Analysis................................. 53 VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act............................ 54 IX. Document Availability................................... 56 X. Effective Date and Congressional Notification............ 59 Order No. 587-W Final Rule (Issued October 16, 2015) 1. In this final rule, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) amends its regulations at 18 CFR 284.12 to incorporate by reference the latest version (Version 3.0) of seven business practice standards applicable to interstate natural gas pipelines adopted by the Wholesale Gas Quadrant (WGQ) of the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB). Interstate natural gas pipelines are required to implement these standards April 1, 2016. 2. The NAESB WGQ Version 3.0 package of standards includes standards governing coordination of the scheduling processes of interstate natural gas pipelines and public utilities that the Commission incorporated by reference in Docket No. RM14-2-000.\1\ These updated business practice standards will replace the earlier version of these business practice standards that previously were incorporated by reference. The standards also revise the codes used to identify receipt and delivery locations in the Index of Customers. In addition, for consistency with the revisions to the Index of Customers, the Commission is also amending its regulations at 18 CFR 157.14, 157.18, 260.8, and 284.13 to have receipt and delivery point information in various interstate natural gas pipeline filings and postings use the same location point names as provided for in the NAESB WGQ Version 3.0 Standards. Finally, we also are making conforming changes to 18 CFR 284.126. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Coordination of the Scheduling Processes of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines and Public Utilities, Order No. 809, Final Rule, 80 FR 23197 (Apr. 24, 2015), FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,368 (Order No. 809). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 67304]] 3. In addition, the Commission terminates, as moot, the proceeding in Docket No. RM14-2-003, as the standard corrections NAESB filed in Docket No. RM14-2-003 are included as part of the Version 3.0 standards that the Commission is incorporating by reference here, with the same implementation date of April 1, 2016. I. Background 4. Since 1996, the Commission has adopted regulations to standardize the business practices and communication methodologies of interstate natural gas pipelines to create a more integrated and efficient pipeline grid. These regulations have been promulgated in the Order No. 587 series of orders,\2\ wherein the Commission has incorporated by reference standards for interstate natural gas pipeline business practices and electronic communications that were developed and adopted by NAESB's WGQ. Upon incorporation by reference, this version of these standards will become part of the Commission's regulations and compliance by interstate natural gas pipelines will become mandatory and will replace the earlier version of these standards that the Commission previously incorporated by reference in 2012.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ This series of orders began with the Commission's issuance of Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, Order No. 587, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,038 (1996). \3\ Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, Final Rule, Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 (2012) (Order No. 587-V). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. On July 23, 2013, as corrected on July 25, 2013, NAESB filed a report informing the Commission that it had adopted and ratified Version 2.1 of its business practice standards applicable to natural gas pipelines. NAESB reported that the WGQ reviewed, at the request of the industry, the necessity of maintaining the current location common codes system to determine if the system provides a significant benefit to the industry and should be continued.\4\ NAESB (in its previous corporate incarnation as the Gas Industry Standards Board) adopted a system of registering common codes to identify interconnection points between pipelines using a single code for the shared point. The industry chose an independent third party to assign and maintain the common code database. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ NAESB Version 2.1 Report dated July 23, 2013 (NAESB Version 2.1 Report). As explained in the NAESB Version 2.1 Report, this request was received by NAESB in November 2010 and was included by the NAESB Board of Directors in the 2011 WGQ Annual Plan as part of Item No. 7 and as part of the 2012 WGQ Annual Plan Item No. 8. See NAESB Version 2.1 Report at 3. The proposed modifications made in response to this request were developed by the WGQ's Business Practices Subcommittee and jointly by the Information Requirements/ Technical Subcommittees. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. NAESB reported that, after extensive discussions, the WGQ reached the conclusion that the NAESB WGQ Standards should no longer support the location common codes system, as the NAESB membership concluded that the system provided little commercial benefit to the industry at large. Consistent with this determination, the Version 2.1 Standards added seven new standards, modified six standards, and deleted three standards to match up with a transition from common codes to the proprietary codes used by interstate pipelines to identify points.\5\ These will be the codes assigned by the transportation service providers for the identification of locations.\6\ The standards require pipelines to post sufficient information on their Web sites to permit shippers and the Commission to identify the interconnection points between pipelines that were previously identified through the common codes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ NAESB Version 2.1 Report at 2. \6\ Id. at 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. Additionally, as requested by the Commission in Order No. 587- V,\7\ NAESB modified the standards to include reporting requirements for ``Design Capacity'' for each location by transportation service providers.\8\ Other changes to the existing standards were made at the request of industry. These include changes to the NAESB WGQ Additional Standards, Nominations Related Standards, Flowing Gas Related Standards, Invoicing Related Standards, Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Standards, Capacity Release Related Standards, and Data Set Standards.\9\ NAESB further reported on the changes it made to the NAESB WGQ Interpretations and Contracts and Manuals that the Commission has declined to incorporate by reference in past Final Rules.\10\ NAESB also reported on all the minor corrections it made to the standards since Version 2.0 of the Standards.\11\ Finally, NAESB reported on items that it considered changing but on which it took no action.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See supra n.3. \8\ NAESB Version 2.1 Report at 2-3. \9\ Id. at 3. \10\ See, e.g., Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at n.11. \11\ NAESB Version 2.1 Report at 18. \12\ Id. at 17-18. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. On November 14, 2014, NAESB filed a report informing the Commission that it had adopted and ratified Version 3.0 of its business practice standards applicable to natural gas pipelines. NAESB reported that all of the modifications made in the Version 2.1 Standards are included in the Version 3.0 Standards and thus no action is needed on the Version 2.1 Standards.\13\ The Version 3.0 Standards introduced modifications to the standards to support efforts to harmonize gas- electric scheduling coordination that NAESB had separately filed and that the Commission incorporated by reference in Order No. 809.\14\ In addition, the Version 3.0 Standards contain revisions to the capacity release standards regarding posting requirements for offers to purchase released capacity that were the subject of the Commission's order to show cause in Docket No. RP14-442-000.\15\ Other revisions in the Version 3.0 Standards are: (1) Revisions to the standards to define ``Operating Capacity'' and ``Design Capacity'' in response to the Commission request in Order No. 587-V; \16\ (2) elimination of the WGQ Interpretations, which the Commission has long declined to incorporate by reference; (3) modifications to standards to reflect the elimination of the WGQ's interpretations of the standards; (4) modifications for maintenance purposes, which includes changes to eliminate the appearance of the electronic data interchange in the imbalance trading process; (5) modifications to reflect new data elements; and (6) edits for clarity and to increase user-friendliness. The Version 3.0 standards have also been revised to include 29 minor corrections.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ NAESB Version 3.0 Report dated November 14, 2014 (NAESB Version 3.0 Report) at 2. \14\ See supra n.1. \15\ Posting of Offers to Purchase Capacity, 146 FERC ] 61,203, at P 6 (2014) (Show Cause Order); B-R Pipeline Co., 149 FERC ] 61,031 (2014) (order accepting compliance filings). \16\ Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at P 8. \17\ The NAESB Version 3.0 Report also provides information on other NAESB activities and tools unrelated to standards development. A complete listing of all the revisions made in NAESB's WGQ Version 3.0 Business Practice Standards to NAESB's prior business practice standards can be found in the Appendix to the Version 3.0 NOPR, 80 FR 43987, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 32,708 at 34,767. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. On July 7, 2015, NAESB filed a report informing the Commission that it made errata corrections to the WGQ Version 3.0 Business Practice Standards.\18\ These corrections incorporated a 9:00 a.m. Central Clock Time (CCT) start to the gas operating day, consistent with the Commission's findings in Order No. 809 \19\ and also corrected other minor errors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ NAESB adopted two minor corrections, MC15009 and MC15012, approved on April 30, 2015 and May 29, 2015, respectively. \19\ Order No. 809, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,368 at P 171. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 67305]] 10. On July 16, 2015, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Version 3.0 NOPR) proposing to amend its regulations to incorporate by reference, with certain enumerated exceptions, the NAESB Version 3.0 business practice standards (referenced above) applicable to natural gas pipelines.\20\ In addition, the Version 3.0 NOPR proposed certain conforming changes to the Commission's regulations at 18 CFR 157.14 and 157.18 (dealing with exhibits) and 260.8 (dealing with system flow diagrams). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 80 FR 43979 (July 24, 2015), FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 32,708 (July 16, 2015) (Version 3.0 NOPR). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. In response to the Version 3.0 NOPR, comments were filed by three commenters. All three commenters express support for the Commission's proposal to incorporate by reference NAESB's Version 3.0 business practice standards. Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) comments that it fully supports the full package of revisions reflected in the NAESB Version 3.0 Standards that are subject to the NOPR. Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) comments that it ``supports the Commission's proposal to amend its regulations to incorporate by reference Version 3.0 of the business practice standards adopted by [NAESB's WGQ] applicable to natural gas pipelines,'' subject to a few suggested modifications.\21\ It supports the Version 3.0 NOPR's proposal to introduce the use of proprietary location codes and to discontinue the use of industry common codes, but it offers suggested minor modifications to the regulatory text accomplishing this transition. Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline (Southern Star), likewise, comments that it ``supports the incorporation by reference of the NAESB WGQ Version 3.0 business practice standards in 18 CFR Sec. 284.12 as proposed.'' \22\ ``[H]owever, Southern Star asks the Commission to clarify its proposed corresponding changes to 18 CFR 157.14, 157.18, 260.8, and 284.13 to avoid confusion and ensure consistent compliance with the regulations.'' \23\ In the discussion below, we will address the comments in greater detail. In addition, on September 25, 2015, NAESB filed a report with the Commission in Docket No. RM96-1-038 announcing that it had made additional minor corrections.\24\ In this Final Rule, the version of the NAESB WGQ business practice standards that we are incorporating by reference into our regulations will include these additional minor corrections. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ INGAA at 1. \22\ Southern Star at 2. \23\ Id. \24\ MC15003, MC15004, and MC15005, which were adopted by the WGQ Executive Committee on April 9, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Discussion A. Incorporation by Reference of the NAESB Standards 1. The NAESB WGQ Version 3.0 Business Practice Standards 12. The NAESB WGQ Version 3.0 Business Practice Standards made a number of changes to the earlier version of those standards that the Commission previously incorporated by reference in 2012 in Order No. 587-V.\25\ Notable among these changes was a change, made at the request of the industry, to introduce the use of proprietary codes to identify the location of points of receipt and delivery. Consistent with this determination, the Version 2.1 Standards added seven new standards, modified six standards, and deleted three standards to match up with a transition from common codes to proprietary codes. Under the new standards, each transportation service provider assigns the proprietary codes it will use to identify the locations of its points of receipt and delivery. The standards require pipelines to post sufficient information on their Web sites to permit shippers and the Commission to identify the interconnection points between pipelines that were previously identified through the common codes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 (2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13. Additionally, as requested by the Commission in Order No. 587- V,\26\ NAESB modified the standards to include reporting requirements for ``Design Capacity'' for each location by transportation service providers. Other changes to the existing standards were made at the request of industry. These include changes to the NAESB WGQ Additional Standards, Nominations Related Standards, Flowing Gas Related Standards, Invoicing Related Standards, Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Standards, Capacity Release Related Standards, and Data Set Standards. NAESB further reports on the changes it made to the NAESB WGQ Interpretations and Contracts and Manuals that the Commission has declined to incorporate by reference in past final rules.\27\ NAESB's Version 3.0 report also identified the minor corrections it made to the standards since Version 2.0 of the Standards. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ Id. P 30. \27\ See, e.g., id. n.11. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. NAESB's Process 14. NAESB used its consensus procedures to develop and approve the Version 3.0 Standards. As the Commission found in Order No. 587, the adoption of consensus standards is appropriate because the consensus process helps ensure the reasonableness of the standards by requiring that the standards draw support from a broad spectrum of industry participants representing all segments of the industry. Moreover, since the industry itself has to conduct business under these standards, the Commission's regulations should reflect those standards that have the widest possible support. In section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTT&AA), Congress affirmatively requires federal agencies to use technical standards developed by voluntary consensus standards organizations, like NAESB, as means to carry out policy objectives or activities determined by the agencies unless an agency determines that the use of such standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. 3. NOPR Proposal 15. In the Version 3.0 NOPR, the Commission proposed to incorporate by reference, in its regulations, Version 3.0 of the NAESB WGQ's consensus business practice standards, with the exception of NAESB's standards specifying the terms of optional model contracts and its eTariff-related standards.\28\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ Version 3.0 NOPR, 80 FR 43982, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 32,708 at P 20. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Comments 16. As explained above, all of the commenters supported the Commission's proposal to incorporate by reference the NAESB WGQ Version 3.0 business practice standards as proposed in the Version 3.0 NOPR.\29\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ See discussion at P 11, supra. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. Commission Determination 17. After a review of the comments filed in response to the Version 3.0 NOPR, the Commission is amending Part 284 of its regulations to incorporate by reference seven of the NAESB WGQ's Version 3.0 business practice standards. Further, as explained in the Version 3.0 NOPR, we are not incorporating by reference the NAESB WGQ's optional model contracts and eTariff-related [[Page 67306]] standards.\30\ In the discussion below, we also will discuss the various comments suggesting modifications to the regulatory text proposed in the Version 3.0 NOPR in the conforming changes we proposed to other provisions of our regulations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\ We are also, as discussed in Section II.D below, making a number of conforming changes in other provisions of our regulations, for consistency with our action here. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Required Compliance Filings 18. To implement the standards we are incorporating by reference in this Final Rule, we will require each interstate natural gas pipeline to file a separate tariff record reflecting the changed standards by February 1, 2016, to take effect on April 1, 2016, and the natural gas pipelines will be required to comply with these standards on and after April 1, 2016.\31\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ To aid in compliance, promptly after issuance of this Final Rule, the Commission will post a sample tariff record on the Commission's Web site that may be accessed at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. All pipelines are to file their tariff records in conformance with this sample tariff record. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Use of Proprietary Codes To Replace Common Codes 1. NOPR Proposal 19. As explained in the Version 3.0 NOPR, at industry's request, NAESB reviewed the location common codes system and concluded that the NAESB WGQ Business Practice Standards should no longer support the location common codes system, as the NAESB membership concluded that the system provided little commercial benefit to the industry at large.\32\ The industry determined that having a third party maintain a common code database is not worth the expense and effort and revised the standards to introduce the use of proprietary codes to identify the location of points of receipt and delivery. The revised standards include requirements to replace much of the information previously contained in the third party database. These standards require interstate pipelines to post on their internet Web sites information on each of the proprietary points that can be used among other things to determine which points are interconnecting points, one of the primary reasons for adoption of the common code database. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ Version 3.0 NOPR, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 32,708 at P 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20. In the Version 3.0 NOPR, the Commission proposed to incorporate by reference the standards that revised the prior standards to introduce the use of proprietary codes to identify the location of points of receipt and delivery and that included requirements for the pipelines to post on their Web sites information on each of the proprietary points that can be used to determine which points are interconnecting points between pipelines.\33\ We also proposed that these same codes be used by the Commission in its Index of Customers to identify the points on shippers' contracts and we proposed to revise Sec. 284.13(c) of the regulations to assure that these provisions operate in harmony.\34\ In the NOPR, we proposed to revise the Commission's regulations at Sec. 284.13(c)(2)(vi) to reflect the use of the term ``location code'' rather than ``industry common code'' to identify the location of receipt and delivery points, and we also proposed to require pipelines to post information on their internet Web site regarding such location points, including the coordinates of each point, and an identification of the upstream or downstream entity, if any, at that point, and date the point becomes active or inactive.\35\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ Id. PP 15-16. \34\ Id. \35\ Id. at proposed regulatory text for Sec. 284.13(c)(2)(vi). (80 FR 43987). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Comments 21. Southern Star & INGAA both support the Commission's proposal to use the term ``location code,'' rather than ``industry common code'' to identify the location of receipt and delivery points.\36\ Southern Star and INGAA, however, point out that the term ``common code'' recurs in a number of places in the Commission's regulations other than in the Index of Customers, and contend that, as a result, the Commission should establish a separate regulation at 18 CFR 284.13(f) for the posting requirement to eliminate the need for repetition.\37\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ INGAA at 2. Southern Star at 3. \37\ Southern Star at 2-3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Commission Determination 22. We will incorporate by reference NAESB's standards requiring interstate pipelines to refer to location points using their own proprietary code, together with a posting of information regarding these codes on the pipelines' Web site, rather than requiring the pipelines to maintain a common code database implemented by a third party. Given the ability of the Commission and customers to continue to identify interconnection points referenced in the Index of Customers through the Web site postings, the Commission also will revise its regulations governing the filing of the Index of Customers and other regulations requiring the specification of location point codes to align with the NAESB standards. 23. We also will adopt Southern Star and INGAA's recommendations to modify the regulations to create a separate requirement at 18 CFR 284.13(f) for the posting of information regarding the location points to make cross-reference easier. Consistent with the proposal in the Version 3.0 NOPR, we are requiring interstate pipelines to file their Index of Customers using the new location names and codes for all active points. In addition, as proposed in the Version 3.0 NOPR, we are requiring pipelines to maintain and post on their Web sites a complete listing of all inactive points. Finally, for the convenience of those reviewing past Index of Customers filings, or those wishing to compare past Index of Customers filings to newer Index of Customers filings, we will post the old common code file for past indices on the Commission's Web site prior to April 1, 2016. C. Index of Customers 1. Filing Format a. NOPR Proposal 24. In the Version 3.0 NOPR, we explained that pipelines currently file the Index of Customers using a tab-delimited file format consistent with Form No. 549B--Index of Customers Instruction Manual.\38\ While we did not propose any changes to that formatting in the Version 3.0 NOPR, we further explained that, --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \38\ Version 3.0 NOPR, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 32,708 at P 17. [b]ecause tab-delimited file formats can be difficult and can result in errors that impose burdens both on Commission and pipeline staff to correct, we also are adding the Index of Customers form to the list of forms that are being updated as part of the Commission's forms refresh project in Docket No. AD15-11-000 (Forms Project). Adding the Index of Customers to the Forms Project will move the Commission towards the use of a standard approach for all Commission forms that will result in more efficient filing and processing of forms.\[\\39\\]\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \39\ Id. b. Comment 25. TVA comments that, while it was neutral in the past, it has come to appreciate that a user-friendly format for the Index of Customers is extremely beneficial to TVA in long-range planning. TVA asserts that, with growing staff to support the growth of gas-fired generation at TVA and counterparties, a user-friendly format for locations codes is a beneficial tool to [[Page 67307]] avoid potential miscommunication of receipt and delivery points from occurring.\40\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \40\ TVA at 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- c. Commission Determination 26. The transition from the current tab delimited file format for the Index of Customers information reported on Form No. 549B to a more up-to-date format will improve the efficient filing and processing of this information. As we explained in the Version 3.0 NOPR, the Commission issued an order (Forms Project Order) initiating a proceeding in Docket No. AD15-11-000 to consider the transition to a new filing format for a number of other Commission forms and has enlisted the assistance of NAESB in this endeavor.\41\ As we explained in Forms Project Order, the current software which the Commission requires industry to use for the electronic filing of many of the forms (Visual Fox Pro) is no longer supported by its developer.\42\ The Commission enlisted NAESB in an effort to transition to an electronic filing format based on the use of Extensible Mark-Up Language (XML), which NAESB helped to develop for electronic tariff filing.\43\ We recognize that NAESB's highest priority is to develop the XML standards for the forms to replace the unsupported and outdated Visual Fox Pro software. While the Index of Customers can still be filed in the current tab delimited format, we agree with TVA that continued use of this format is inefficient for both the industry and the Commission. Accordingly, we request that NAESB consider revisions to the Index of Customers as part of their ongoing deliberations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \41\ Electronic Filing Protocols for Commission Forms, 151 FERC ] 61,025 (2015). \42\ Id. P 1. \43\ Electronic Tariff Filings, Order No. 714, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,276 (2008). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Index of Customers Instruction Manual a. NOPR Proposal 27. In the Version 3.0 NOPR, the Commission proposed to post on the Commission's Web site a revised instruction manual for the filing of Form No. 549B--Index of Customers.\44\ As promised, after issuance of the Version 3.0 NOPR, the Commission posted the proposed revised instruction manual on its Web site. The only proposed changes to the instruction manual were to Item ID yj (Point identification Code Qualifier) and Item ID yk (Point identification Code) to specify that the new proprietary location names and codes were to be used in identifying points of receipt and delivery in the Index of Customers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \44\ Version 3.0 NOPR, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 32,708 at P 17 & n.26. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- b. Comments 28. Southern Star and INGAA both suggest that three changes are needed to the proposed instruction manual for the Index of Customers: \45\ First, in the instructions for Item yh (the Point Identifier Code), the commenters suggest that the references to G1-Gas Transaction Point 1 and G2-Gas Transaction Point 2 should be deleted as these are antiquated codes that are no longer used in the referenced NAESB business standard. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \45\ Southern Star at 5-6 and INGAA at 7-9. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 29. Second, for Item yj (the Point identification Code Qualifier), the commenters suggest that the instructions should simply read ``Enter 95'' as all location codes will now be assigned by the pipeline (the Transportation Service Provider). 30. Third, for Item yk (the Point Identification Code), the commenters suggest that the instructions should simply read ``Enter the Transportation Service Provider's Location (LOC)'' as there is no longer an industry common code to enter. INGAA asserts that this item should read ``Enter the pipeline's location code.'' It makes this suggestion because ``Pipeline'' is the term utilized throughout the Instruction Manual. c. Commission Determination 31. As to the suggestion to revise the instruction manual to delete references to references to G1 and G2 in the instructions for Item yh (the Point Identifier Code), we find this suggestion reasonable and will make this change. 32. As to the suggestion to revise the instruction manual to revise the instructions for Item yj, we see merit in this suggestion, but believe the suggested language would be clearer if it read ``Enter 95 whenever item yk is the Transmission Service Provider's Location (LOC)'' and will revise the instruction manual accordingly. 33. As to the suggestion to revise the instruction manual to revise the instructions for Item yk to read ``Enter the Transmission Service Provider's Location (LOC),'' we find this suggestion reasonable and will make this change. 34. As to the suggestion to revise the instruction manual to revise the instructions for Item yj to substitute the term ``Pipeline'' in lieu of the term ``Transmission Service Provider,'' we are not persuaded to make this revision, as the term ``Transmission Service Provider'' matches the terminology in the standards we are incorporating. As we did after we issued the Version 3.0 NOPR, we will post a link to the revised instruction manual on our Web site after issuance of this Final Rule.\46\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \46\ To aid in compliance, promptly after issuance of this Final Rule, a Revised Instruction Manual for filing Form No. 549B, Index of Customers, will be posted on the Commission's Web site and may be accessed at http://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/indus-act/pipelines/standards.asp. All pipelines are to file their Index of Customers in accordance with the instructions provided in this manual. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 35. Finally, our review of the comments also brought to our attention that Item yi (Point Name) also needs revision to reflect the transition to the use of proprietary location codes in the Version 3.0 standards. Thus, the Instructions for Item ID yi will now read as follows: ``Enter the Location Name (LOC Name) of the point or facility.'' D. Cross-References/Conforming Changes 1. NOPR Proposal 36. In the Version 3.0 NOPR, the Commission proposed conforming changes to reference the new location names and codes at 18 CFR 157.14 and 18 CFR 157.18 (dealing with exhibits), in 18 CFR 260.8 (dealing with system flow diagrams), and in 18 CFR 284.13 (dealing with reporting requirements for interstate pipelines). 2. Comments 37. Along with their comments suggesting that the Commission move its proposed regulation at Sec. 284.13(c)(2)(6) into a new subsection Sec. 284.13(f), the commenters point out the Commission missed two references to common codes in Sec. 284.13(b) and suggest revisions to the accompanying cross references proposed in the Version 3.0 NOPR.\47\ INGAA further requests two minor additional modifications.\48\ In Sec. 157.14(a), INGAA argues that the Commission should remove the reference to Exhibit H(iv) that appears in the proposed regulatory text because Exhibit H(iv) no longer exists. In addition, INGAA requests the Commission to clarify that it did not intend to delete certain language after the asterisks in both Sec. Sec. 157.14(a) and 157.18(c). Specifically, INGAA states that the Commission should revise the language at the beginning of item 2 of its proposed amendment to Sec. 157.14(a) to state that ``Section 157.14 is amended by revising the introductory language of paragraph (a) to read as follows:'' (emphasis added), and insert ``(1)'' before the asterisks. In INGAA's view, [[Page 67308]] this would remove any doubt about how much of the existing section is being replaced with the new proposed language. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \47\ INGAA at 2-4, Southern Star at 3-4. \48\ INGAA at 7. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Commission Determination 38. Given the Commission's determination that, as proposed by the commenters, the proper provision in which to place the requirement for pipelines to use ``location code'' rather than ``industry common code'' to identify the location of receipt and delivery points is at 18 CFR 284.13(f), we will make appropriate cross-references. We agree with INGAA that the inclusion of Exhibit H(iv) in the regulatory text of proposed Sec. 157.14(a) is in error. Reference to this exhibit was deleted in Order No. 699 as an erroneous or outdated reference.\49\ Thus, we will delete any reference to Exhibit H(iv) in the regulatory text we are promulgating in this Final Rule. In addition, as requested, we will clarify that our revisions to Sec. 157.14(a) and Sec. 157.18(c) are not intended to delete language that follows later in these provisions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \49\ Conforming Changes, Order No. 699, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,254 at P 10 (cross-referenced at 120 FERC ] 61,134 (2007)). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 39. Finally, as a result of the INGAA comment that we needed to make additional conforming changes that were overlooked, we also will make a conforming change to 18 CFR 284.126 to remove the reference to common codes. Intrastate pipelines filing Form No. 549D should identify their location codes and names in their list of jurisdictional points of receipt and delivery. III. Implementation Schedule 40. In the Version 3.0 NOPR, the Commission stated that we anticipated acting on the proposed rule in order to permit these standards to become effective April 1, 2016 at the same time as the Gas-Electric Harmonization standards, with compliance filings due February 1, 2016.\50\ We explained that requiring implementation of the updated business practice standards and the Gas-Electric Harmonization standards on the same date should reduce the compliance burden on the pipelines and avoid confusion.\51\ We also explained our policies on tariff filings and on waiver requests.\52\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \50\ Version 3.0 NOPR, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 32,708 at P 23. \51\ Id. \52\ Id. PP 23-27. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 41. None of the comments took issue with the Commission's proposed implementation schedule. Nor did the comments take issue or seek clarification with regard to the Commission's explanation of its policies on tariff filings and on waiver requests. We are not modifying these policies in this Final Rule and stand by the explanation of those policies we made in the Version 3.0 NOPR. The Commission will require interstate natural gas pipelines to comply with the revised NAESB standards that we are incorporating by reference in this Final Rule beginning on April 1, 2016. Thus, among other requirements, when pipelines make their Index of Customers filing for the second quarter of 2016 and thereafter they should do so using the new location names and codes for all active points. We are requiring this implementation schedule to give the interstate natural gas pipelines subject to these standards adequate time to implement these changes. In addition, the interstate natural gas pipelines must file tariff records to reflect the changed standards by February 1, 2016. 42. In addition, consistent with the requirements in Order Nos. 587-V and 809,\53\ the Commission is including the following compliance filing requirements to increase the transparency of the pipelines' incorporation by reference of the NAESB WGQ Standards so that shippers and the Commission will know which tariff provision(s) implements each standard as well as the status of each standard. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \53\ Order No. 587-V, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,332 at PP 36-37; Order No. 809, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,368 at P 169. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) The pipelines must designate a single tariff record under which every NAESB standard currently incorporated by reference by the Commission is listed.\54\ This section should be a separate tariff record under the Commission's electronic tariff filing requirement and should be filed electronically using the eTariff portal using the Type of Filing Code 580. The Commission will post on its eLibrary Web site (under Docket No. RM96-1-038) a sample tariff record, to provide filers an illustrative example to aid them in preparing their compliance filings; \55\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \54\ See supra n.31. \55\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) For each standard, each pipeline must specify in the tariff record a list of all the NAESB standards currently incorporated by reference by the Commission: (a) whether the standard is incorporated by reference; (b) for those standards not incorporated by reference, the tariff provision that complies with the standard; \56\ and --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \56\ For example, pipelines are required to include the full text of the NAESB nomination and capacity release timeline standards (WGQ Standards 1.3.2(i-vi) and 5.3.2) in their tariffs. See, e.g., Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, Order No. 587-U, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,307, at P 39 & n.42 (2010). The pipeline would indicate which tariff provision complies with each of these standards. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (c) a statement identifying any standards for which the pipeline has been granted a waiver, extension of time, or other variance with respect to compliance with the standard.\57\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \57\ Shippers can use the Commission's electronic tariff system to locate the tariff record containing the NAESB standards, which will indicate the docket in which any waiver or extension of time was granted. (3) If the pipeline is requesting a continuation of an existing waiver or extension of time, it must include a table in its transmittal letter that states the standard for which a waiver or extension of time was granted, and the docket number or order citation to the proceeding in which the waiver or extension was granted. IV. Notice of Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards 43. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-119 (section 11) (February 10, 1998) provides that federal agencies should publish a request for comment in a NOPR when the agency is seeking to issue or revise a regulation proposing to adopt a voluntary consensus standard or a government-unique standard. In this Final Rule, the Commission is amending its regulations to incorporate by reference voluntary consensus standards developed by NAESB's WGQ. In section 12(d) of NTT&AA, Congress affirmatively requires federal agencies to use technical standards developed by voluntary consensus standards organizations to carry out policy objectives or activities determined by the agencies unless use of such standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.\58\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \58\ Pub L. No. 104-113, 12(d), 110 Stat. 775 (1996), 15 U.S.C. 272 note (1997). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 44. In section 12(d) of NTT&AA, Congress affirmatively requires federal agencies to use technical standards developed by voluntary consensus standards organizations to carry out policy objectives or activities determined by the agencies unless use of such standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. V. Incorporation by Reference 45. The Office of the Federal Register requires agencies incorporating material by reference in final rules to discuss, in the preamble of the final rule, the ways that the materials it incorporates by [[Page 67309]] reference are reasonably available to interested parties and how interested parties can obtain the materials.\59\ The regulations also require agencies to summarize, in the preamble of the final rule, the material it incorporates by reference. The seven NAESB standards being incorporated by reference in this Final Rule can be summarized as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \59\ 1 CFR 51.5. See Incorporation by Reference, 79 FR 66267 (Nov. 7, 2014).Additional Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015). These standards cover general areas or standards applicable to multiple business activities, such as creditworthiness and gas/electric operational communications. Nominations Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015). These standards define the business processes used to schedule natural gas service on pipelines. Flowing Gas Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015). These standards define the business processes related to the communication of entitlement rights to flowing gas at a location, the entitlement rights on a contractual basis, the management of imbalances, and the measurement and gas quality information of the actual flow of gas. Invoicing Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015). These standards define the business process for the communication of charges for services rendered (Invoice), communication of details about funds rendered in payment for services rendered (Payment Remittance), and communication of the financial status of a customer's account (Statement of Account). Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015). These standards establish the framework for the electronic dissemination and communication of information between parties in the North American wholesale gas marketplace for EDI/EDM transfers, batch flat file/EDM transfers, informational postings Web sites, EBB/EDM and interactive flat file/ EDM. Capacity Release Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015). These standards define the business processes for communication of information related to the release or transfer of any portion of a transmission service requester's contract rights for transportation on pipelines. Internet Electronic Transport Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015). These standards define the implementation of various technologies necessary to communicate transactions and other electronic data using standard protocols for electronic commerce over the internet between NAESB trading partners. 46. Our regulations provide that copies of the NAESB standards incorporated by reference may be obtained from the North American Energy Standards Board, 801 Travis Street, Suite 1675, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 356-0060. NAESB's Web site is at http://www.naesb.org/. Copies may be inspected at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Phone: (202) 502-8371, http://www.ferc.gov.\60\ The procedures utilized by NAESB make its standards reasonably available to those affected by the Commission regulations.\61\ Participants can join NAESB, for an annual membership cost of $7,000, which entitles them to full participation in NAESB and enables them to obtain these standards at no cost.\62\ Non-members may obtain the Individual Standards Manual or Booklets for each standard by email for $250 per manual or booklet, which in the case of these standards would total $1,000.\63\ Nonmembers also may obtain the complete set of Standards Manuals, Booklets, and Contracts on CD for $2,000. NAESB also provides a free electronic read-only version of the standards for a three business day period or, in the case of a regulatory comment period, through the end of the comment period.\64\ In addition, NAESB considers requests for waivers of the charges on a case by case basis based on need. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \60\ 18 CFR 284.12. \61\ As a private, consensus standards developer, NAESB needs the funds obtained from its membership fees and sales of its standards to finance the organization. The parties affected by these Commission regulations generally are highly sophisticated and have the means to acquire the information they need to effectively participate in Commission proceedings. \62\ North American Energy Standards Board Membership Application, https://www.naesb.org/pdf4/naesbapp.pdf. \63\ NAESB Materials Order Form, https://www.naesb.org//pdf/ordrform.pdf. \64\ Procedures for non-members to evaluate work products before purchasing, https://www.naesb.org/misc/NAESB_Nonmember_Evaluation.pdf. See Incorporation by Reference, 79 FR at 66271, n. 51 & 53 (Nov. 7, 2014) (citing to NAESB's procedure of providing ``no-cost, no-print electronic access,'' NAESB Comment, at 1, available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=OFR-2013-0001-0023). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VI. Information Collection Statement 47. The collections of information for this Final Rule are being submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 \65\ and OMB's implementing regulations.\66\ OMB must approve information collection requirements imposed by agency rules. The burden estimates for this Final Rule are for one-time implementation of the information collection requirements of this Final Rule (including tariff filing, documentation of the process and procedures, and IT work), and ongoing burden. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \65\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d). \66\ 5 CFR 1320. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 48. The Commission solicits comments from the public on the Commission's need for this information, whether the information will have practical utility, the accuracy of the burden estimates, recommendations to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondents' burden, including the use of automated information techniques. The burden estimates are for implementing the information collection requirements of this Final Rule. The Commission asks that any revised burden estimates submitted by commenters include the details and assumptions used to generate the estimates. 49. The collections of information related to this Final Rule fall under FERC-545 (Gas Pipeline Rates: Rate Change (Non-Formal)) \67\ and FERC-549C (Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines).\68\ The following estimates of reporting burden are related only to this Final Rule and include the costs to pipelines to comply with the Commission's directives in this Final Rule. The burden estimates are primarily related to start-up to implement these standards and regulations and will not result in ongoing costs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \67\ FERC-545 covers rate change filings made by natural gas pipelines, including tariff changes. \68\ FERC-549C covers Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines. [[Page 67310]] One-Time Effects of NOPR in Docket RM96-1-038 [Rounded] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Annual number Total annual burden Cost per respondents of responses Total number Average burden and cost hours and total annual respondent \69\ per respondent of responses per response cost \70\ ($) (1) (2) (1)*(2)=(3) (4)..................... (3)*(4)=(5)............ (5)/(1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FERC-545A \71\....................... 165 1 165 10 hrs.; $837........... 1,650 hrs.; $138,056... $837 FERC-549C \72\....................... 165 1 165 22 hrs.; $1,841......... 3,630 hrs.; $303,722... $1,841 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Totals........................... .............. .............. .............. ........................ 5,280 hrs.; $441,778... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Information Collection Costs: The Commission estimates the average annualized cost for all respondents to be the following: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \69\ The number of respondents is the number of entities in which a change in burden from the current standards to the proposed exists, not the total number of entities from the current or proposed standards that are applicable. \70\ Wage data is based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics data for 2012 (``May 2012 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, [for] Sector 22--Utilities'' at http://bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm) and is compiled for the top 10 percent earned. For the estimate of the benefits component, see http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm. \71\ The mean hourly cost of tariff filings and implementation for interstate natural gas pipelines is $83.67. This represents the average wage (salary and benefits for 2,080 annual work-hours) of the following occupational categories: ``Legal'' ($128.02 per hour), ``Computer Analyst'' ($83.50 per hour), and ``Office and Administrative'' ($39.49 per hour). Wage data is available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm and is compiled for the top 10 percent earned. For the estimate of the benefits component, see http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm. \72\ The mean hourly cost of tariff filings and implementation for interstate natural gas pipelines is $83.67. It is composed of the skill sets and related hourly costs described above. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FERC-545 FERC-549C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Annualized Capital/Startup Costs........ $138,056 $303,722 Annualized Costs (Operations & N/A N/A Maintenance)........................... ------------------------------- Total Annualized Costs.............. $138,056 $303,722 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total Cost for all Respondents = $441,778. OMB regulations require OMB to approve certain information collection requirements imposed by agency rule. The Commission is submitting notification of this Final Rule to OMB. These information collections are mandatory requirements. Title: FERC-545,\73\ Gas Pipeline Rates: Rates Change (Non-Formal); FERC-549C, Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \73\ In the supporting statement for the NOPR, we submitted Gas and Pipeline Rates: Rate Changes (non-formal) under the temporary collection no. FERC-545A to ensure timely submission to OMB as another unrelated item was pending OMB review under FERC-545 (and only one item per collection can be pending at OMB). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Action: Information collections. OMB Control Nos.: 1902-0154, 1902-0174 Respondents: Business or other for profit (i.e., Natural Gas Pipelines, applicable to only a few small businesses). Although the intraday reporting requirements will affect electric plant operators, the Commission is not imposing the reporting burden of adopting these standards on those entities. Frequency of Responses: One-time implementation (business procedures, capital/start-up). 50. Internal Review: The Commission has reviewed the proposed business practice standards of natural gas pipelines and has determined that the revisions the Commission makes in this Final Rule to its regulations are necessary to establish more efficient coordination between the natural gas and electric industries. Requiring such information ensures both a common means of communication and common business practices to eliminate miscommunication for participants engaged in the sale of electric energy at wholesale and the transportation of natural gas. These requirements conform to the Commission's plan for efficient information collection, communication, and management within the natural gas pipeline industry. The Commission has assured itself, by means of its internal review, that there is specific, objective support for the burden estimates associated with the information requirements. 51. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting requirements by contacting the following: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: Ellen Brown, Office of the Executive Director, email: [email protected], phone: (202) 502-8663, fax: (202) 273-0873]. 52. Comments concerning the collections of information and the associated burden estimates should be sent to the Commission and to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503 [Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, telephone: (202) 395-0710, fax: (202) 395-4718]. For security reasons, comments to OMB should be submitted by email to: [email protected]. Comments submitted to OMB should include OMB Control Numbers 1902-0154 and 1902-0174. VII. Environmental Analysis 53. The Commission concludes that neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement is required for this Final Rule under section 380.4(a) of the Commission's regulations, which provides a categorical exemption for actions that are clarifying, corrective, or procedural, or that do not substantively change the effect of legislation or regulations being amended, for information gathering, analysis, and dissemination, or for the [[Page 67311]] sale, exchange, or transportation of natural gas under sections 4, 5, and 7 of the Natural Gas Act that require no construction of facilities.\74\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \74\ See 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii), 380.4(a)(5), 380.4(a)(27). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act 54. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) \75\ generally requires a description and analysis of final rules that will have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Small Business Administration (SBA) revised its size standard (effective January 22, 2014) for electric utilities from a standard based on megawatt hours to a standard based on the number of employees including affiliates.\76\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \75\ 5 U.S.C. 601-612. \76\ SBA Final Rule on ``Small Business Size Standards: Utilities,'' 78 FR 77343 (Dec. 23, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 55. This Final Rule applies only to interstate natural gas pipelines, most of which are not small businesses. The Commission estimates that approximately 165 interstate pipeline entities are potential respondents subject to the data reporting requirements of FERC-545 and also are subject to data collection FERC 549-C reporting requirements. For the year 2012 (the most recent year for which information is available), only eleven companies not affiliated with larger companies had annual revenues of less than $25.5 million and are defined by the SBA as ``small entities.'' These companies constitute about seven percent of the total universe of potential respondents. The Commission estimates that the one-time implementation cost of the proposals in this Final Rule is $441,778 (or $2,677 per entity, regardless of entity size).\77\ The Commission does not consider the estimated $2,677 impact per entity to be significant. Moreover, these requirements are designed to benefit all customers, including small businesses that must comply with them. Further, as noted above, adoption of consensus standards helps ensure the reasonableness of the standards by requiring that the standards draw support from a broad spectrum of industry participants representing all segments of the industry. Because of that representation and the fact that industry conducts business under these standards, the Commission's regulations should reflect those standards that have the widest possible support. Accordingly, pursuant to Sec. 605(b) of the RFA,\78\ the Commission certifies that this Final Rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \77\ This number is derived by dividing the total cost figure by the number of respondents. $441,778/165 = $2,677. \78\ 5 U.S.C. 605(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IX. Document Availability 56. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the Internet through FERC's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) and in FERC's Public Reference Room during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. 57. From FERC's Home Page on the Internet, this information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket number field. 58. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the FERC's Web site during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at 202-502- 6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at [email protected], or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502- 8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. Email the Public Reference Room at [email protected]. X. Effective Date and Congressional Notification 59. These regulations are effective December 2, 2015. The Commission has determined (with the concurrence of the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB) that this rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined in section 351 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This Final Rule is being submitted to the Senate, House, and Government Accountability Office. List of Subjects 18 CFR Parts 157 and 260 Natural gas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 18 CFR Part 284 Incorporation by reference, Natural gas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. By the Commission. Issued: October 16, 2015. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. In consideration of the foregoing, the Commission amends parts 157, 260, and 284, chapter I, title 18, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows. PART 157--APPLICATIONS FOR CERTIFICATES OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AND FOR ORDERS PERMITTING AND APPROVING ABANDONMENT UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE NATURAL GAS ACT 0 1. The authority citation for part 157 continues to read as follows: Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717-717z. 0 2. Section 157.14 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: Sec. 157.14 Exhibits. (a) To be attached to each application. All exhibits specified must accompany each application when tendered for filing. Together with each exhibit applicant must provide a full and complete explanation of the data submitted, the manner in which it was obtained, and the reasons for the conclusions derived from the exhibits. If the Commission determines that a formal hearing upon the application is required or that testimony and hearing exhibits should be filed, the Secretary will promptly notify the applicant that submittal of all exhibits and testimony of all witnesses to be sponsored by the applicant in support of his case-in-chief is required. Submittal of these exhibits and testimony must be within 20 days from the date of the Secretary's notice, or any other time as the Secretary will specify. Exhibits, except exhibits F, F- 1, G, G-I, and G-II, must be submitted to the Commission on electronic media as prescribed in Sec. 385.2011 of this chapter. Receipt and delivery point information required in various exhibits must be labeled with a location point name and code in conformity with the location name and code the pipeline has adopted in conformance with Sec. 284.13(f) of this chapter. Intervenors and persons becoming intervenors after the date of the Secretary's notice must be advised by the applicant of the afore-specified exhibits and testimony, and must be furnished with copies upon request. If this section requires an applicant to reveal Critical Energy Infrastructure Information (CEII), as defined by Sec. 388.113(c) of this chapter, to any person, the applicant shall follow the procedures set out in Sec. 157.10(d). * * * * * [[Page 67312]] 0 3. Section 157.18 is amended by revising paragraph (c) introductory text to read as follows: Sec. 157.18 Applications to abandon facilities or service; exhibits. (c) Exhibit V--Flow diagram showing daily design capacity and reflecting operation of applicant's system after abandonment. Receipt and delivery point information required in various exhibits must be labeled with a location point name and code in accordance with the location name and code the pipeline has adopted in conformance with Sec. 284.13(f) of this chapter. A flow diagram showing daily design capacity and reflecting operating conditions of applicant's system after abandonment of facilities on that segment of the system affected by the abandonment, including the following: * * * * * PART 260--STATEMENTS AND REPORTS (SCHEDULES) 0 4. The authority citation for part 260 continues to read as follows: Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717-717z, 3301-3432; 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352. 0 5. Section 260.8 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: Sec. 260.8 System flow diagrams: Format No. FERC 567. (a) Each Major natural gas pipeline company, having a system delivery capacity in excess of 100,000 Mcf per day (measured at 14.73 p.s.i.a. and 60[deg] F), shall file with the Commission by June 1 of each year five (5) copies of a diagram or diagrams reflecting operating conditions on its main transmission system during the previous twelve months ended December 31. For purposes of system peak deliveries, the heating season overlapping the year's end shall be used. Facilities shall be those installed and in operation on December 31 of the reporting year. All volumes shall be reported on a uniform stated pressure and temperature base. Receipt and delivery point information required in various exhibits must be labeled with a location point name and code in accordance with the location name and code adopted by the pipeline in accordance with Sec. 284.13(f) of this chapter. * * * * * PART 284--CERTAIN SALES AND TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS UNDER THE NATURAL GAS POLICY ACT OF 1978 AND RELATED AUTHORITIES 0 6. The authority citation for part 284 continues to read as follows: Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717-717z, 3301-3432; 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352; 43 U.S.C. 1331-1356. 0 7. Section 284.12 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows: Sec. 284.12 Standards for pipeline business operations and communications. (a) * * * (1) An interstate pipeline that transports gas under subparts B or G of this part must comply with the business practices and electronic communications standards as promulgated by the North American Energy Standards Board, as incorporated herein by reference in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) thru (vii) of this section. (i) Additional Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015); (ii) Nominations Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015); (iii) Flowing Gas Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015); (iv) Invoicing Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015); (v) Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015); (vi) Capacity Release Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015); and (vii) Internet Electronic Transport Related Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor corrections applied through June 29, 2015). * * * * * 0 8. Section 284.13 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(1)(vi), (b)(2)(iv) and (c)(2)(vi), and adding paragraph (f) to read as follows: Sec. 284.13 Reporting requirements for interstate pipelines. (b) * * * (1) * * * (vi) The receipt and delivery points and the zones or segments covered by the contract, including the location name and code adopted by the pipeline in conformance with paragraph (f) of this section for each point, zone or segment; * * * * * (2) * * * (iv) The receipt and delivery points and the zones or segments covered by the contract, including the location name and code adopted by the pipeline in conformance with paragraph (f) of this section for each point, zone or segment; * * * * * (c) * * * (2) * * * (vi) The receipt and delivery points and the zones or segments covered by the contract, including the location name and code adopted by the pipeline in conformance with paragraph (f) of this section for each point, zone or segment; * * * * * (f) Location codes. An interstate pipeline must maintain a posting on its publicly available Internet Web site of the pipeline's location names and codes for all current and inactive receipt and delivery points on its system, including, for each point: Direction of flow, the location of the point, the location zone if such exists, the Commission company identification code (CID), if any, of the upstream and/or downstream entity, the location type, the current status as active and inactive, and the date(s) the point becomes active or inactive. The pipeline must provide the information in downloadable file formats, in conformity with the requirements of 18 CFR 284.12 of this chapter. 0 9. Section 284.126 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)(iv) to read as follows: Sec. 284.126 Reporting requirements. (b) * * * (1) * * * (iv) The primary receipt and delivery points covered by the contract, identified by the list of points that the pipeline has published with the Commission; * * * * * [FR Doc. 2015-27806 Filed 10-30-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 67305
10. On July 16, 2015, the Commission minor corrections.24 In this Final Rule, report also identified the minor
issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking the version of the NAESB WGQ corrections it made to the standards
(Version 3.0 NOPR) proposing to amend business practice standards that we are since Version 2.0 of the Standards.
its regulations to incorporate by incorporating by reference into our
2. NAESB’s Process
reference, with certain enumerated regulations will include these additional
exceptions, the NAESB Version 3.0 minor corrections. 14. NAESB used its consensus
business practice standards (referenced II. Discussion procedures to develop and approve the
above) applicable to natural gas Version 3.0 Standards. As the
pipelines.20 In addition, the Version 3.0 A. Incorporation by Reference of the Commission found in Order No. 587,
NAESB Standards the adoption of consensus standards is
NOPR proposed certain conforming
changes to the Commission’s regulations 1. The NAESB WGQ Version 3.0 appropriate because the consensus
at 18 CFR 157.14 and 157.18 (dealing Business Practice Standards process helps ensure the reasonableness
with exhibits) and 260.8 (dealing with of the standards by requiring that the
12. The NAESB WGQ Version 3.0 standards draw support from a broad
system flow diagrams). Business Practice Standards made a spectrum of industry participants
11. In response to the Version 3.0 number of changes to the earlier version representing all segments of the
NOPR, comments were filed by three of those standards that the Commission industry. Moreover, since the industry
commenters. All three commenters previously incorporated by reference in itself has to conduct business under
express support for the Commission’s 2012 in Order No. 587–V.25 Notable
these standards, the Commission’s
proposal to incorporate by reference among these changes was a change,
regulations should reflect those
NAESB’s Version 3.0 business practice made at the request of the industry, to
standards that have the widest possible
introduce the use of proprietary codes to
standards. Tennessee Valley Authority support. In section 12(d) of the National
identify the location of points of receipt
(TVA) comments that it fully supports Technology Transfer and Advancement
and delivery. Consistent with this
the full package of revisions reflected in Act of 1995 (NTT&AA), Congress
determination, the Version 2.1
the NAESB Version 3.0 Standards that affirmatively requires federal agencies to
Standards added seven new standards,
are subject to the NOPR. Interstate use technical standards developed by
modified six standards, and deleted
Natural Gas Association of America voluntary consensus standards
three standards to match up with a
(INGAA) comments that it ‘‘supports the transition from common codes to organizations, like NAESB, as means to
Commission’s proposal to amend its proprietary codes. Under the new carry out policy objectives or activities
regulations to incorporate by reference standards, each transportation service determined by the agencies unless an
Version 3.0 of the business practice provider assigns the proprietary codes it agency determines that the use of such
standards adopted by [NAESB’s WGQ] will use to identify the locations of its standards would be inconsistent with
applicable to natural gas pipelines,’’ points of receipt and delivery. The applicable law or otherwise impractical.
subject to a few suggested standards require pipelines to post 3. NOPR Proposal
modifications.21 It supports the Version sufficient information on their Web sites
3.0 NOPR’s proposal to introduce the to permit shippers and the Commission 15. In the Version 3.0 NOPR, the
use of proprietary location codes and to to identify the interconnection points Commission proposed to incorporate by
discontinue the use of industry common between pipelines that were previously reference, in its regulations, Version 3.0
codes, but it offers suggested minor identified through the common codes. of the NAESB WGQ’s consensus
modifications to the regulatory text 13. Additionally, as requested by the business practice standards, with the
Commission in Order No. 587–V,26 exception of NAESB’s standards
accomplishing this transition. Southern
NAESB modified the standards to specifying the terms of optional model
Star Central Gas Pipeline (Southern
include reporting requirements for contracts and its eTariff-related
Star), likewise, comments that it
‘‘Design Capacity’’ for each location by standards.28
‘‘supports the incorporation by
reference of the NAESB WGQ Version transportation service providers. Other 4. Comments
changes to the existing standards were
3.0 business practice standards in 18
made at the request of industry. These 16. As explained above, all of the
CFR § 284.12 as proposed.’’ 22
include changes to the NAESB WGQ commenters supported the
‘‘[H]owever, Southern Star asks the Commission’s proposal to incorporate
Additional Standards, Nominations
Commission to clarify its proposed by reference the NAESB WGQ Version
Related Standards, Flowing Gas Related
corresponding changes to 18 CFR Standards, Invoicing Related Standards, 3.0 business practice standards as
157.14, 157.18, 260.8, and 284.13 to Quadrant Electronic Delivery proposed in the Version 3.0 NOPR.29
avoid confusion and ensure consistent Mechanism Standards, Capacity Release
compliance with the regulations.’’ 23 In 5. Commission Determination
Related Standards, and Data Set
the discussion below, we will address Standards. NAESB further reports on 17. After a review of the comments
the comments in greater detail. In the changes it made to the NAESB WGQ filed in response to the Version 3.0
addition, on September 25, 2015, Interpretations and Contracts and NOPR, the Commission is amending
NAESB filed a report with the Manuals that the Commission has Part 284 of its regulations to incorporate
Commission in Docket No. RM96–1–038 declined to incorporate by reference in by reference seven of the NAESB WGQ’s
announcing that it had made additional past final rules.27 NAESB’s Version 3.0 Version 3.0 business practice standards.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Further, as explained in the Version 3.0
20 Standards for Business Practices of Interstate 24 MC15003, MC15004, and MC15005, which
NOPR, we are not incorporating by
Natural Gas Pipelines, Notice of Proposed were adopted by the WGQ Executive Committee on reference the NAESB WGQ’s optional
Rulemaking, 80 FR 43979 (July 24, 2015), FERC April 9, 2015.
Stats. & Regs. ¶ 32,708 (July 16, 2015) (Version 3.0 25 Standards for Business Practices of Interstate model contracts and eTariff-related
NOPR). Natural Gas Pipelines, Order No. 587–V, FERC
21 INGAA at 1. Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,332 (2012). 28 Version 3.0 NOPR, 80 FR 43982, FERC Stats.
22 Southern Star at 2. 26 Id. P 30. & Regs. ¶ 32,708 at P 20.
23 Id. 27 See, e.g., id. n.11. 29 See discussion at P 11, supra.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM 02NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_67513/page/4.svg)
![67306 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
standards.30 In the discussion below, we delivery and that included requirements other regulations requiring the
also will discuss the various comments for the pipelines to post on their Web specification of location point codes to
suggesting modifications to the sites information on each of the align with the NAESB standards.
regulatory text proposed in the Version proprietary points that can be used to 23. We also will adopt Southern Star
3.0 NOPR in the conforming changes we determine which points are and INGAA’s recommendations to
proposed to other provisions of our interconnecting points between modify the regulations to create a
regulations. pipelines.33 We also proposed that these separate requirement at 18 CFR
same codes be used by the Commission 284.13(f) for the posting of information
6. Required Compliance Filings regarding the location points to make
in its Index of Customers to identify the
18. To implement the standards we points on shippers’ contracts and we cross-reference easier. Consistent with
are incorporating by reference in this proposed to revise § 284.13(c) of the the proposal in the Version 3.0 NOPR,
Final Rule, we will require each regulations to assure that these we are requiring interstate pipelines to
interstate natural gas pipeline to file a provisions operate in harmony.34 In the file their Index of Customers using the
separate tariff record reflecting the NOPR, we proposed to revise the new location names and codes for all
changed standards by February 1, 2016, Commission’s regulations at active points. In addition, as proposed
to take effect on April 1, 2016, and the § 284.13(c)(2)(vi) to reflect the use of the in the Version 3.0 NOPR, we are
natural gas pipelines will be required to term ‘‘location code’’ rather than requiring pipelines to maintain and post
comply with these standards on and ‘‘industry common code’’ to identify the on their Web sites a complete listing of
after April 1, 2016.31 location of receipt and delivery points, all inactive points. Finally, for the
B. Use of Proprietary Codes To Replace and we also proposed to require convenience of those reviewing past
Common Codes pipelines to post information on their Index of Customers filings, or those
internet Web site regarding such wishing to compare past Index of
1. NOPR Proposal location points, including the Customers filings to newer Index of
19. As explained in the Version 3.0 coordinates of each point, and an Customers filings, we will post the old
NOPR, at industry’s request, NAESB identification of the upstream or common code file for past indices on
reviewed the location common codes downstream entity, if any, at that point, the Commission’s Web site prior to
system and concluded that the NAESB and date the point becomes active or April 1, 2016.
WGQ Business Practice Standards inactive.35
C. Index of Customers
should no longer support the location 2. Comments
common codes system, as the NAESB 1. Filing Format
membership concluded that the system 21. Southern Star & INGAA both
support the Commission’s proposal to a. NOPR Proposal
provided little commercial benefit to the
industry at large.32 The industry use the term ‘‘location code,’’ rather 24. In the Version 3.0 NOPR, we
determined that having a third party than ‘‘industry common code’’ to explained that pipelines currently file
maintain a common code database is not identify the location of receipt and the Index of Customers using a tab-
worth the expense and effort and delivery points.36 Southern Star and delimited file format consistent with
revised the standards to introduce the INGAA, however, point out that the Form No. 549B—Index of Customers
use of proprietary codes to identify the term ‘‘common code’’ recurs in a Instruction Manual.38 While we did not
location of points of receipt and number of places in the Commission’s propose any changes to that formatting
delivery. The revised standards include regulations other than in the Index of in the Version 3.0 NOPR, we further
requirements to replace much of the Customers, and contend that, as a result, explained that,
information previously contained in the the Commission should establish a [b]ecause tab-delimited file formats can be
third party database. These standards separate regulation at 18 CFR 284.13(f) difficult and can result in errors that impose
require interstate pipelines to post on for the posting requirement to eliminate burdens both on Commission and pipeline
their internet Web sites information on the need for repetition.37 staff to correct, we also are adding the Index
each of the proprietary points that can of Customers form to the list of forms that are
3. Commission Determination being updated as part of the Commission’s
be used among other things to forms refresh project in Docket No. AD15–
22. We will incorporate by reference
determine which points are 11–000 (Forms Project). Adding the Index of
NAESB’s standards requiring interstate
interconnecting points, one of the Customers to the Forms Project will move the
pipelines to refer to location points
primary reasons for adoption of the Commission towards the use of a standard
using their own proprietary code,
common code database. approach for all Commission forms that will
20. In the Version 3.0 NOPR, the together with a posting of information result in more efficient filing and processing
Commission proposed to incorporate by regarding these codes on the pipelines’ of forms.[39]
reference the standards that revised the Web site, rather than requiring the
prior standards to introduce the use of pipelines to maintain a common code b. Comment
proprietary codes to identify the database implemented by a third party. 25. TVA comments that, while it was
location of points of receipt and Given the ability of the Commission and
neutral in the past, it has come to
customers to continue to identify
appreciate that a user-friendly format for
interconnection points referenced in the
30 We are also, as discussed in Section II.D below,
the Index of Customers is extremely
making a number of conforming changes in other Index of Customers through the Web
beneficial to TVA in long-range
provisions of our regulations, for consistency with site postings, the Commission also will
planning. TVA asserts that, with
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
our action here. revise its regulations governing the
31 To aid in compliance, promptly after issuance growing staff to support the growth of
filing of the Index of Customers and
of this Final Rule, the Commission will post a gas-fired generation at TVA and
sample tariff record on the Commission’s Web site counterparties, a user-friendly format
33 Id. PP 15–16.
that may be accessed at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-
filing/elibrary.asp. All pipelines are to file their 34 Id. for locations codes is a beneficial tool to
tariff records in conformance with this sample tariff 35 Id. at proposed regulatory text for
record. § 284.13(c)(2)(vi). (80 FR 43987). 38 Version 3.0 NOPR, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 32,708
32 Version 3.0 NOPR, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 32,708 36 INGAA at 2. Southern Star at 3. at P 17.
at P 4. 37 Southern Star at 2–3. 39 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM 02NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_67513/page/5.svg)
![67310 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
ONE-TIME EFFECTS OF NOPR IN DOCKET RM96–1–038
[Rounded]
Annual Total annual burden Cost per
Number of number of Total number Average burden and hours and total respondent 70
respondents 69 responses per of responses cost per response annual cost ($)
respondent
(1) (2) (1)*(2)=(3) (4) (3)*(4)=(5) (5)÷(1)
FERC–545A 71 ............. 165 1 165 10 hrs.; $837 ............... 1,650 hrs.; $138,056 ... $837
FERC–549C 72 ............. 165 1 165 22 hrs.; $1,841 ............ 3,630 hrs.; $303,722 ... $1,841
Totals .................... ........................ ........................ ........................ ...................................... 5,280 hrs.; $441,778.
Information Collection Costs: The annualized cost for all respondents to be
Commission estimates the average the following:
FERC–545 FERC–549C
Annualized Capital/Startup Costs ............................................................................................................................ $138,056 $303,722
Annualized Costs (Operations & Maintenance) ...................................................................................................... N/A N/A
Total Annualized Costs .................................................................................................................................... $138,056 $303,722
Total Cost for all Respondents = $441,778.
OMB regulations require OMB to Final Rule to its regulations are 52. Comments concerning the
approve certain information collection necessary to establish more efficient collections of information and the
requirements imposed by agency rule. coordination between the natural gas associated burden estimates should be
The Commission is submitting and electric industries. Requiring such sent to the Commission and to the
notification of this Final Rule to OMB. information ensures both a common Office of Management and Budget,
These information collections are means of communication and common Office of Information and Regulatory
mandatory requirements. business practices to eliminate Affairs, Washington, DC 20503
Title: FERC–545,73 Gas Pipeline Rates: miscommunication for participants [Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal
Rates Change (Non-Formal); FERC– Energy Regulatory Commission,
engaged in the sale of electric energy at
549C, Standards for Business Practices telephone: (202) 395–0710, fax: (202)
wholesale and the transportation of
of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines 395–4718]. For security reasons,
Action: Information collections. natural gas. These requirements
conform to the Commission’s plan for comments to OMB should be submitted
OMB Control Nos.: 1902–0154, 1902– by email to: oira_submission@
0174 efficient information collection,
communication, and management omb.eop.gov. Comments submitted to
Respondents: Business or other for
within the natural gas pipeline industry. OMB should include OMB Control
profit (i.e., Natural Gas Pipelines,
Numbers 1902–0154 and 1902–0174.
applicable to only a few small The Commission has assured itself, by
businesses). Although the intraday means of its internal review, that there VII. Environmental Analysis
reporting requirements will affect is specific, objective support for the
electric plant operators, the Commission burden estimates associated with the 53. The Commission concludes that
is not imposing the reporting burden of information requirements. neither an Environmental Assessment
adopting these standards on those nor an Environmental Impact Statement
51. Interested persons may obtain is required for this Final Rule under
entities.
Frequency of Responses: One-time information on the reporting section 380.4(a) of the Commission’s
implementation (business procedures, requirements by contacting the regulations, which provides a
capital/start-up). following: Federal Energy Regulatory categorical exemption for actions that
50. Internal Review: The Commission Commission, 888 First Street NE., are clarifying, corrective, or procedural,
has reviewed the proposed business Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: Ellen or that do not substantively change the
practice standards of natural gas Brown, Office of the Executive Director, effect of legislation or regulations being
pipelines and has determined that the email: DataClearance@ferc.gov, phone: amended, for information gathering,
revisions the Commission makes in this (202) 502–8663, fax: (202) 273–0873]. analysis, and dissemination, or for the
69 The number of respondents is the number of 71 The mean hourly cost of tariff filings and 72 The mean hourly cost of tariff filings and
entities in which a change in burden from the implementation for interstate natural gas pipelines implementation for interstate natural gas pipelines
current standards to the proposed exists, not the is $83.67. This represents the average wage (salary is $83.67. It is composed of the skill sets and related
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
total number of entities from the current or and benefits for 2,080 annual work-hours) of the hourly costs described above.
proposed standards that are applicable.
70 Wage data is based on the Bureau of Labor
following occupational categories: ‘‘Legal’’ ($128.02 73 In the supporting statement for the NOPR, we
per hour), ‘‘Computer Analyst’’ ($83.50 per hour), submitted Gas and Pipeline Rates: Rate Changes
Statistics data for 2012 (‘‘May 2012 National
and ‘‘Office and Administrative’’ ($39.49 per hour). (non-formal) under the temporary collection no.
Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and
Wage Estimates, [for] Sector 22—Utilities’’ at http:// Wage data is available from the Bureau of Labor FERC–545A to ensure timely submission to OMB as
bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm) and is compiled Statistics at http://bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_ another unrelated item was pending OMB review
for the top 10 percent earned. For the estimate of 22.htm and is compiled for the top 10 percent under FERC–545 (and only one item per collection
the benefits component, see http://www.bls.gov/ earned. For the estimate of the benefits component, can be pending at OMB).
news.release/ecec.nr0.htm. see http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM 02NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_67513/page/9.svg)
![67312 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
■ 3. Section 157.18 is amended by PART 284—CERTAIN SALES AND the contract, including the location
revising paragraph (c) introductory text TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS name and code adopted by the pipeline
to read as follows: UNDER THE NATURAL GAS POLICY in conformance with paragraph (f) of
ACT OF 1978 AND RELATED this section for each point, zone or
§ 157.18 Applications to abandon facilities AUTHORITIES segment;
or service; exhibits.
■ 6. The authority citation for part 284 * * * * *
(c) Exhibit V—Flow diagram showing
continues to read as follows: (2) * * *
daily design capacity and reflecting
operation of applicant’s system after Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717–717z, 3301–3432; (iv) The receipt and delivery points
abandonment. Receipt and delivery 42 U.S.C. 7101–7352; 43 U.S.C. 1331–1356. and the zones or segments covered by
point information required in various ■ 7. Section 284.12 is amended by the contract, including the location
exhibits must be labeled with a location revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as name and code adopted by the pipeline
point name and code in accordance follows: in conformance with paragraph (f) of
with the location name and code the this section for each point, zone or
§ 284.12 Standards for pipeline business segment;
pipeline has adopted in conformance operations and communications.
with § 284.13(f) of this chapter. A flow * * * * *
(a) * * *
diagram showing daily design capacity (1) An interstate pipeline that (c) * * *
and reflecting operating conditions of transports gas under subparts B or G of (2) * * *
applicant’s system after abandonment of this part must comply with the business
facilities on that segment of the system (vi) The receipt and delivery points
practices and electronic
affected by the abandonment, including communications standards as and the zones or segments covered by
the following: promulgated by the North American the contract, including the location
* * * * * Energy Standards Board, as name and code adopted by the pipeline
incorporated herein by reference in in conformance with paragraph (f) of
PART 260—STATEMENTS AND paragraphs (a)(1)(i) thru (vii) of this this section for each point, zone or
REPORTS (SCHEDULES) section. segment;
(i) Additional Standards (Version 3.0, * * * * *
■ 4. The authority citation for part 260 November 14, 2014, with minor
(f) Location codes. An interstate
continues to read as follows: corrections applied through June 29,
pipeline must maintain a posting on its
2015);
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717–717z, 3301–3432; (ii) Nominations Related Standards publicly available Internet Web site of
42 U.S.C. 7101–7352. (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with the pipeline’s location names and codes
minor corrections applied through June for all current and inactive receipt and
■ 5. Section 260.8 is amended by 29, 2015); delivery points on its system, including,
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: (iii) Flowing Gas Related Standards for each point: Direction of flow, the
(Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with location of the point, the location zone
§ 260.8 System flow diagrams: Format No.
FERC 567. minor corrections applied through June if such exists, the Commission company
29, 2015); identification code (CID), if any, of the
(a) Each Major natural gas pipeline (iv) Invoicing Related Standards upstream and/or downstream entity, the
company, having a system delivery (Version 3.0, November 14, 2014, with location type, the current status as
capacity in excess of 100,000 Mcf per minor corrections applied through June active and inactive, and the date(s) the
day (measured at 14.73 p.s.i.a. and 60° 29, 2015); point becomes active or inactive. The
F), shall file with the Commission by (v) Quadrant Electronic Delivery pipeline must provide the information
June 1 of each year five (5) copies of a Mechanism Related Standards (Version in downloadable file formats, in
diagram or diagrams reflecting operating 3.0, November 14, 2014, with minor conformity with the requirements of 18
conditions on its main transmission corrections applied through June 29,
CFR 284.12 of this chapter.
system during the previous twelve 2015);
(vi) Capacity Release Related ■ 9. Section 284.126 is amended by
months ended December 31. For
Standards (Version 3.0, November 14, revising paragraph (b)(1)(iv) to read as
purposes of system peak deliveries, the
2014, with minor corrections applied follows:
heating season overlapping the year’s
through June 29, 2015); and
end shall be used. Facilities shall be (vii) Internet Electronic Transport § 284.126 Reporting requirements.
those installed and in operation on Related Standards (Version 3.0,
December 31 of the reporting year. All (b) * * *
November 14, 2014, with minor
volumes shall be reported on a uniform corrections applied through June 29, (1) * * *
stated pressure and temperature base. 2015). (iv) The primary receipt and delivery
Receipt and delivery point information * * * * * points covered by the contract,
required in various exhibits must be ■ 8. Section 284.13 is amended by identified by the list of points that the
labeled with a location point name and revising paragraphs (b)(1)(vi), (b)(2)(iv) pipeline has published with the
code in accordance with the location and (c)(2)(vi), and adding paragraph (f) Commission;
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
name and code adopted by the pipeline to read as follows: * * * * *
in accordance with § 284.13(f) of this [FR Doc. 2015–27806 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am]
chapter. § 284.13 Reporting requirements for
interstate pipelines. BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) The receipt and delivery points
and the zones or segments covered by
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM 02NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_67513/page/11.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-01 11:29:38
Document Modified: 2018-03-01 11:29:38
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule will become effective December 2, 2015. Implementation of these standards is required on April 1, 2016. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of December 2, 2015. | |
| Contact | Stanley Wolf (technical issues), Office of Energy Policy and Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-6841, Email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 67302 | |
| CFR Citation | 18
CFR
157 18 CFR 260 18 CFR 284 | |
| CFR Associated | Natural Gas; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Incorporation by Reference |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR