80 FR 67407 - Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 211 (November 2, 2015)
Administration for Children and Families
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 211 (November 2, 2015)
| Page Range | 67407-67408 | |
| FR Document | 2015-27833 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 211 (Monday, November 2, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 67407-67408] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-27833] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request Title: Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative. OMB No.: New Collection. Description: The Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative is sponsored by the Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Capacity Building Collaborative includes three centers (Center for States, Center for Tribes, Center for Courts) funded by the Children's Bureau to provide national child welfare expertise and evidence-informed training and technical assistance services to State, Tribal and Territorial public child welfare agencies and Court Improvement Programs (CIPs). The Centers offer a wide array of services including, but not limited to: Web-based content and resources, product development and dissemination, self-directed and group-based training, virtual learning and peer networking events, and tailored consultation and coaching. During the project period the Centers' services will be evaluated by both Center-specific evaluations and a Cross-Center Evaluation. The Center-specific evaluations are designed to collect data on Center-specific processes and outcomes. The Cross-Center Evaluation is designed to respond to a set of cross-cutting evaluation questions posed by the Children's Bureau. The Cross-Center Evaluation will examine: The extent to which key partners across and within the Centers are collaborating; whether the capacity building service interventions offered by the Centers are evaluable; the degree to which Centers follow common protocols; whether service interventions are delivered or performed as designed; how satisfied recipients are with the services received; how effective the service interventions were; which service approaches were most effective and under what conditions; and the costs of services. The Cross-Center Evaluation is utilizing a longitudinal mixed methods approach to evaluate the Centers' services as they develop and mature over the course of the study period. Multiple data collection strategies will be used to efficiently capture quantitative and qualitative data to enable analyses that address each evaluation question. Proposed Cross-Center Evaluation data sources for this effort include (1) satisfaction surveys to assess recipients' satisfaction with services, such as the Learning Experiences Satisfaction Survey; (2) a leadership interview, administered to all State child welfare directors, Tribal child welfare directors, and CIP coordinators that are receiving services from the Centers; and (3) a collaboration survey, an annual Web-based survey administered to the directors and staff of the three Centers. Center-specific data sources for this effort include (1) assessment tools such as the Tribal Organizational Assessment Caseworker Interview; and (2) service-specific feedback forms, such as the Center for States Intensive Projects instrument and the Center for Courts CQI Workshops instrument. Respondents: Respondents of data collection instruments will include (1) child welfare and judicial professionals that use the Centers' Web pages, products, and online courses, that participate in virtual or in-person trainings or peer events, and that receive brief or intensive tailored services from the Centers; (2) State child welfare directors, Tribal child welfare directors, and CIP coordinators that are receiving services from the Centers; and (3) the directors and staff of the three Capacity Building Centers. The proposed data collection will span four years. Annual Burden Estimates ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Annual number Number of Average Instrument of responses per burden hours Total annual respondents respondent per response burden hours ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Webpage & Product Satisfaction Survey........... 1,560 1 .08 125 Learning Experiences Satisfaction Survey........ 500 1 .33 165 Learning Experience Module Survey............... 900 1 .08 72 Peer Event Satisfaction Survey.................. 5,502 1 .08 441 Assessment & Capacity Building Plan Satisfaction 450 1 .066 30 Survey......................................... Center for Tribes Contact Form.................. 50 1 .05 3 Center for Tribes Demographic Survey............ 20 1 1.75 35 Tribal Organizational Assessment Caseworker 20 1 1.25 25 Interview...................................... Tribal Organizational Assessment Community 16 1 1.25 20 Provider Interview............................. Tribal Organizational Assessment Community 12 1 1.0 12 Member/Elder Interview......................... Tribal Organizational Assessment Family 14 1 1.0 14 Interview...................................... Center for States Information and Referral...... 12 1 .05 1 Center for States Intensive Projects............ 330 2 .33 218 Center for States Constituency Groups........... 400 2 .33 264 Center for States Consultant Feedback Form...... 156 1 .13 21 Center for States Brief Services................ 125 1 .33 42 [[Page 67408]] CIP Annual Meeting Survey....................... 200 1 .13 26 Center for Courts CQI Workshops................. 48 1 .17 8 Leadership Interview--States.................... 13 2 1 26 Leadership Interview--CIPs...................... 13 2 1 26 Leadership Interview--Tribes.................... 8 2 1.25 20 Leadership Interview Part II--Tribes............ 8 2 .67 11 Annual Collaboration Survey..................... 230 1 .36 83 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,688. In compliance with the requirements of Section 506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described above. Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and comments may be forwarded by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. Email address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. The Department specifically requests comments on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted within 60 days of this publication. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2015-27833 Filed 10-30-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices 67407
the Secretary on the types of problems Collaborative is sponsored by the The Cross-Center Evaluation is
and inquiries encountered by Children’s Bureau, Administration for utilizing a longitudinal mixed methods
consumers’’ (Sec. 2793 (d)). Analysis of Children and Families of the U.S. approach to evaluate the Centers’
this data reporting will help identify Department of Health and Human services as they develop and mature
patterns of practice in the insurance Services. The Capacity Building over the course of the study period.
marketplaces and uncover suspected Collaborative includes three centers Multiple data collection strategies will
patterns of noncompliance. HHS must (Center for States, Center for Tribes, be used to efficiently capture
share program data reports with the Center for Courts) funded by the quantitative and qualitative data to
Departments of Labor and Treasury, and Children’s Bureau to provide national enable analyses that address each
State regulators. Program data also can child welfare expertise and evidence- evaluation question. Proposed Cross-
offer CCIIO one indication of the informed training and technical Center Evaluation data sources for this
effectiveness of State enforcement, assistance services to State, Tribal and
affording opportunities to provide effort include (1) satisfaction surveys to
Territorial public child welfare agencies assess recipients’ satisfaction with
technical assistance and support to State and Court Improvement Programs
insurance regulators and, in extreme services, such as the Learning
(CIPs). The Centers offer a wide array of Experiences Satisfaction Survey; (2) a
cases, inform the need to trigger federal services including, but not limited to:
enforcement. Form Number: CMS– leadership interview, administered to
Web-based content and resources, all State child welfare directors, Tribal
10333 (OMB Control Number: 0938–
product development and child welfare directors, and CIP
1097); Frequency: Annually, Quarterly;
dissemination, self-directed and group- coordinators that are receiving services
Affected Public: Private Sector: State,
Local, or Tribal Governments; Number based training, virtual learning and peer from the Centers; and (3) a collaboration
of Respondents: 51; Total Annual networking events, and tailored survey, an annual Web-based survey
Responses: 459; Total Annual Hours: consultation and coaching. During the administered to the directors and staff of
9,588. (For policy questions regarding project period the Centers’ services will the three Centers. Center-specific data
this collection contact Lateefa Dawkins be evaluated by both Center-specific
sources for this effort include (1)
at 301–492–4262.) evaluations and a Cross-Center
assessment tools such as the Tribal
Evaluation. The Center-specific
Dated: October 28, 2015. Organizational Assessment Caseworker
evaluations are designed to collect data
William N. Parham, III, Interview; and (2) service-specific
on Center-specific processes and
Director, Paperwork Reduction Staff, Office feedback forms, such as the Center for
outcomes. The Cross-Center Evaluation
of Strategic Operations and Regulatory States Intensive Projects instrument and
Affairs. is designed to respond to a set of cross-
the Center for Courts CQI Workshops
cutting evaluation questions posed by
[FR Doc. 2015–27859 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am] instrument.
the Children’s Bureau. The Cross-Center
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P Respondents: Respondents of data
Evaluation will examine: The extent to
which key partners across and within collection instruments will include (1)
the Centers are collaborating; whether child welfare and judicial professionals
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES the capacity building service that use the Centers’ Web pages,
interventions offered by the Centers are products, and online courses, that
Administration for Children and evaluable; the degree to which Centers participate in virtual or in-person
Families follow common protocols; whether trainings or peer events, and that receive
service interventions are delivered or brief or intensive tailored services from
Proposed Information Collection performed as designed; how satisfied the Centers; (2) State child welfare
Activity; Comment Request recipients are with the services directors, Tribal child welfare directors,
Title: Evaluation of the Child Welfare received; how effective the service and CIP coordinators that are receiving
Capacity Building Collaborative. interventions were; which service services from the Centers; and (3) the
OMB No.: New Collection. approaches were most effective and directors and staff of the three Capacity
Description: The Evaluation of the under what conditions; and the costs of Building Centers. The proposed data
Child Welfare Capacity Building services. collection will span four years.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Annual Number of Average Total annual
Instrument number of responses per burden hours burden hours
respondents respondent per response
Webpage & Product Satisfaction Survey ........................................................ 1,560 1 .08 125
Learning Experiences Satisfaction Survey ...................................................... 500 1 .33 165
Learning Experience Module Survey .............................................................. 900 1 .08 72
Peer Event Satisfaction Survey ....................................................................... 5,502 1 .08 441
Assessment & Capacity Building Plan Satisfaction Survey ............................ 450 1 .066 30
Center for Tribes Contact Form ....................................................................... 50 1 .05 3
Center for Tribes Demographic Survey ........................................................... 20 1 1.75 35
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Tribal Organizational Assessment Caseworker Interview ............................... 20 1 1.25 25
Tribal Organizational Assessment Community Provider Interview ................. 16 1 1.25 20
Tribal Organizational Assessment Community Member/Elder Interview ........ 12 1 1.0 12
Tribal Organizational Assessment Family Interview ........................................ 14 1 1.0 14
Center for States Information and Referral ..................................................... 12 1 .05 1
Center for States Intensive Projects ................................................................ 330 2 .33 218
Center for States Constituency Groups ........................................................... 400 2 .33 264
Center for States Consultant Feedback Form ................................................. 156 1 .13 21
Center for States Brief Services ...................................................................... 125 1 .33 42
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:55 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM 02NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_67618/page/1.svg)
![67408 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES—Continued
Annual Number of Average Total annual
Instrument number of responses per burden hours burden hours
respondents respondent per response
CIP Annual Meeting Survey ............................................................................ 200 1 .13 26
Center for Courts CQI Workshops .................................................................. 48 1 .17 8
Leadership Interview—States .......................................................................... 13 2 1 26
Leadership Interview—CIPs ............................................................................ 13 2 1 26
Leadership Interview—Tribes .......................................................................... 8 2 1.25 20
Leadership Interview Part II—Tribes ............................................................... 8 2 .67 11
Annual Collaboration Survey ........................................................................... 230 1 .36 83
Estimated Total Annual Burden DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND instructions for submitting comments.
Hours: 1,688. HUMAN SERVICES Comments submitted electronically,
In compliance with the requirements including attachments, to http://
Food and Drug Administration www.regulations.gov will be posted to
of Section 506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
the docket unchanged. Because your
Reduction Act of 1995, the [Docket No. FDA–2015–D–2270]
comment will be made public, you are
Administration for Children and
The Drug Supply Chain Security Act solely responsible for ensuring that your
Families is soliciting public comment comment does not include any
on the specific aspects of the Implementation: Product Tracing
Requirements for Dispensers— confidential information that you or a
information collection described above. third party may not wish to be posted,
Compliance Policy; Updated Guidance
Copies of the proposed collection of such as medical information, your or
for Industry, Availability
information can be obtained and anyone else’s Social Security number, or
comments may be forwarded by writing AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, confidential business information, such
to the Administration for Children and HHS. as a manufacturing process. Please note
Families, Office of Planning, Research ACTION:Notice of availability; revised that if you include your name, contact
and Evaluation, 370 L’Enfant guidance document. information, or other information that
Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447, identifies you in the body of your
Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug comments, that information will be
Email address: infocollection@ Administration (FDA or we) is issuing a posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be revised guidance document that extends • If you want to submit a comment
identified by the title of the information the compliance policy described in the with confidential information that you
collection. guidance for industry entitled ‘‘DSCSA do not wish to be made available to the
Implementation: Product Tracing public, submit the comment as a
The Department specifically requests Requirements for Dispensers— written/paper submission and in the
comments on: (a) Whether the proposed Compliance Policy.’’ This revised manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
collection of information is necessary guidance announces FDA’s intention Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
for the proper performance of the with regard to enforcement of certain
functions of the agency, including Written/Paper Submissions
product tracing requirements of the
whether the information shall have Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Submit written/paper submissions as
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the (FD&C Act) added by the Drug Supply follows:
agency’s estimate of the burden of the Chain Security Act (DSCSA). FDA does • Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
proposed collection of information; (c) not intend to take action against written/paper submissions): Division of
the quality, utility, and clarity of the dispensers who, prior to March 1, 2016, Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
information to be collected; and (d) accept ownership of product without and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
receiving transaction information, Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
ways to minimize the burden of the • For written/paper comments
collection of information on transaction history, and transaction
statements (product tracing submitted to the Division of Dockets
respondents, including through the use Management, FDA will post your
of automated collection techniques or information), prior to or at the time of
a transaction, or do not capture and comment, as well as any attachments,
other forms of information technology. except for information submitted,
Consideration will be given to maintain the product tracing
information, as required by the FD&C marked and identified, as confidential,
comments and suggestions submitted if submitted as detailed in
within 60 days of this publication. Act.
‘‘Instructions.’’
DATES: Effective November 2, 2015. For Instructions: All submissions received
Robert Sargis, information about enforcement dates, must include the Docket No. FDA–
Reports Clearance Officer. please see the SUPPLEMENTARY 2015–D–2270 for ‘‘The Drug Supply
[FR Doc. 2015–27833 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am] INFORMATION section. Chain Security Act Implementation:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P ADDRESSES: You may submit comments Product Tracing Requirements for
as follows: Dispensers—Compliance Policy;
Revised Guidance for Industry.’’
Electronic Submissions Received comments will be placed in
Submit electronic comments in the the docket and, except for those
following way: submitted as ‘‘Confidential
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the http://www.regulations.gov or at the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:55 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM 02NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_67618/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-01 11:30:23
Document Modified: 2018-03-01 11:30:23
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 67407 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR