80 FR 67443 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Deleting Rule 410B Governing Reporting Requirements for Off-Exchange Transactions
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 211 (November 2, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 211 (November 2, 2015)
| Page Range | 67443-67446 | |
| FR Document | 2015-27796 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 211 (Monday, November 2, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 67443-67446] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-27796] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-76277; File No. SR-NYSE-2015-48] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Deleting Rule 410B Governing Reporting Requirements for Off-Exchange Transactions October 27, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that, on October 16, 2015, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self- regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a. \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to delete Rule 410B governing reporting requirements for off-Exchange transactions. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to delete Rule 410B, which sets forth certain regulatory reporting requirements for member or member organizations effecting off-Exchange transactions in Exchange listed securities that are not reported to the Consolidated Tape, and to make conforming amendments to Rule 9217 to delete a reference to Rule 410B. Background Rule 410B Currently, Rule 410B requires members or member organizations to report to the Exchange transactions in NYSE-listed securities effected for the account of a member or member organization, or for the account of a customer of a member or member organization, that are not reported to the Consolidated Tape. Reports prepared pursuant to the Rule must contain the following information:Time and date of the transaction; stock symbol of the listed security; number of shares; price; marketplace where the transaction was executed; an indication whether the transaction was a buy (B), sell (S) or cross (C); an indication whether the transaction was executed as principal or agent; and the name of the contra-side broker-dealer to the trade.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Rule 410B. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rule 410B was adopted in 1992. At the time, transactions in NYSE- listed stocks effected outside of business hours or in foreign markets were not reported to the Consolidated Tape and, with the exception of program trading information, were not reported to the Exchange. The Exchange (then the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.) believed that ``all transactions in NYSE-listed stocks that are not reported to the Consolidated Tape should be reported to the Exchange in order to provide an accurate record of overall trading activity in NYSE-listed stocks.'' \5\ The Rule 410B reporting requirement would thus ``augment and enhance'' the Exchange's ability to ``surveil for and investigate, among other matters, insider trading, frontrunning and manipulative activities'' and ``provide a more complete audit trail and depiction of member trading in each NYSE-listed stock, which should facilitate surveillance by the Exchange in NYSE-listed stocks.'' \6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 31358 (October 26, 1992), 57 FR 1294 (January 6, 1992) (SR-NYSE-91-45) (``Rule 410B Approval Order''). \6\ See id., 57 FR at 1294. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Despite the significant changes to the marketplace and the regulatory landscape in the ensuing decades, Rule 410B has not been substantively amended since it was adopted.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ Rule 410B was amended in 2007 in connection with a filing updating the definition of program trading in Rule 80A.40(b) to make conforming changes to the rule. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55793 (May 22, 2007), 72 FR 29567 (May 29, 2007) (SR-NYSE-2007- 34). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes to Regulatory Landscape On July 30, 2007, the NASD, NYSE, and NYSE Regulation, Inc. (``NYSE Regulation'') consolidated their member firm regulation operations to create the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''), and entered into a plan to allocate to FINRA regulatory responsibility for common rules and common members (``17d-2 [[Page 67444]] Agreement'').\8\ In 2008, the parties also entered into a plan to allocate regulatory responsibility over common NYSE members to NYSE Regulation for surveillance, investigation, and enforcement of insider trading with respect to NYSE-listed stocks, among others, irrespective of where the relevant trading occurred (the ``Insider Trading Plan'').\9\ On June 14, 2010, FINRA was retained to perform the residual market surveillance and enforcement functions that had, up to that point, been performed by NYSE Regulation.\10\ In January 2011, the SEC approved an amendment to the Insider Trading Plan whereby FINRA also assumed responsibility for performing the insider trading-related market surveillance and enforcement functions previously conducted by NYSE Regulation for its U.S. equities and options markets.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56148 (July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42146 (August 1, 2007) (File No. 4-544) (Notice of Filing and Order Approving and Declaring Effective a Plan for the Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities). In 2007, the parties also entered into a Regulatory Services Agreement (``RSA''), whereby FINRA was retained to perform certain regulatory services for non- common rules. \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58536 (September 12, 2008), 73 FR 54646 (September 22, 2008) (File No. 4-566). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58806 (October 17, 2008), 73 FR 63216 (October 23, 2008) (File No. 4-566). \10\ See note 8, supra; Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62355 (June 22, 2010), 75 FR 36729 (June 28, 2010) (SR-NYSE-2010- 46); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62354 (June 22, 2010), 75 FR 36730 (June 28, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2010-57). \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63750 (January 21, 2011), 76 FR 4948 (January 27, 2011) (File No. 4-566). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes in Trade Reporting and Regulatory Reporting In 1998, FINRA (then the NASD) established the Order Audit Trail System (OATS), as an integrated audit trail of order, quote, and trade information for OTC equity securities and equity securities listed and traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (``Nasdaq'').\12\ In 2010, in order to enhance the scope of the order audit trail in the U.S. equity markets following the creation of FINRA, FINRA Rules 7410 through 7470 (the ``OATS Rules'') were amended to extend the recording and reporting requirements to all NMS stocks, as that term is defined in Rule 600(b)(47) of Regulation NMS,\13\ including NYSE-listed securities. The Exchange adopted the OATS Rules in 2011.\14\ FINRA may utilize the information it collects pursuant to the OATS Rules to perform its regulatory functions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 39729 (March 6, 1998), 63 FR 12559 (March 13, 1998) (SR-NASD-97-56). \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63311 (November 12, 2010), 75 FR 70757 (November 18, 2010) (SR-FINRA-2010-044) (``OATS Extension Approval Order''). By capturing OATS information for all NMS stocks, FINRA noted that it would be able to expand its existing surveillance patterns to conduct more comprehensive cross-market surveillance in furtherance of the Exchange's outsourcing of its surveillance and other regulatory functions to FINRA. See id. at 70758. The Commission observed extending OATS to all NMS stocks was calculated to ``enhance FINRA's market surveillance and investigative capabilities'' and in turn ``enhance FINRA's oversight of the U.S. equities markets.'' Id. \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65523 (October 7, 2011), 76 FR 64154 (October 17, 2011) (SR-NYSE-2011-49). The Commission noted that member and member organizations that are also FINRA members (``Dual Members'') need only report OATS information to FINRA once to meet both the FINRA and NYSE OATS requirements. See id. at 64155. Further, the Commission noted that NYSE member organizations that were not members of FINRA were also members of NASDAQ (this is still the case today, see note 21, infra), and, as such, were subject to certain OATS obligations for proprietary trading firms under the NASDAQ Rule 6950 Series that were ``substantially similar'' to the NASDAQ OATS requirements for the same firms. See id. OATS information for NYSE-only member firms is available for FINRA to utilize for regulatory purposes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rule 410B also predates the establishment of a FINRA Trade Reporting Facility (``TRF''). FINRA Rule 6110 requires FINRA members to report transactions in NMS stocks \15\ effected ``otherwise than on or through a national securities exchange.'' \16\ Pursuant to FINRA Rules 6310A and 6310B, FINRA members may use either the FINRA/NYSE TRF or FINRA/Nasdaq TRF to report such off-Exchange transactions.\17\ FINRA members using these TRFs to report off-Exchange transactions are in turn subject to FINRA Rule 7230B, which imposes transaction information reporting requirements similar to Rule 410B.\18\ As a result, Dual Members must report off-Exchange transactions to a TRF and submit substantially similar reports to the NYSE and FINRA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ As defined in Rule 600(b)(47) of SEC Regulation NMS. \16\ See FINRA Rule 6110. See generally FINRA Rule 6300A and 7200A Series (FINRA/Nasdaq TRF) and 6300B and 7200B Series (FINRA/ NYSE TRF). Transactions in non-NMS stocks such as OTC Markets securities, ADRs, Canadian issues, foreign securities and non- exchange-listed DPP securities and transactions in Restricted Equity Securities pursuant to Securities Act Rule 144A are governed by the FINRA Rule 6620 and 7300 Series and must be reported to FINRA's OTC Reporting Facility or ORF. FINRA's rules expressly provide that certain types of transactions need not to be reported for publication or regulatory purposes, including transactions in foreign equity securities executed on and reported to a foreign securities exchange or executed OTC in a foreign country and reported to that country's securities regulator. See Trade Reporting Frequently Asked Questions, Section 500, Q/A500:1 & Section 701, Q/ A701.1, available at http://www.finra.org/industry/trade-reporting-faq. \17\ See FINRA Rules 6300A & 6300B. \18\ See Rule 7230B. Specifically, the following information must be submitted for each transaction: (1) Security Identification Symbol of the eligible security (SECID); (2) number of shares or bonds; (3) unit price, excluding commissions, mark-ups or mark- downs; (4) time of execution expressed in hours, minutes and seconds based on Eastern Time in military format, unless another provision of FINRA rules requires that a different time be included on the report; (5) a symbol indicating whether the party submitting the trade report represents the Reporting Member (denoted as the Executing Party or ``EPID'') side or the Non-Reporting Party (denoted as the Contra Party or ``CPID'') side; (6) a symbol indicating whether the transaction is a buy, sell or cross, and if applicable, a symbol indicating that the transaction is a sell short or sell short exempt trade from the Reporting Member perspective or contra side perspective, irrespective of whether the contra side is a member; (7) a symbol indicating whether the trade is as principal, riskless principal, or agent; (8) reporting side Clearing Broker (if other than normal Clearing Broker); (9) reporting side executing broker in the case of a give up agreement, as defined in Rule 6380B(g); (10) contra side executing broker; (11) contra side Introducing Broker in the case of a give up agreement, as defined in Rule 6380B(g); and (12) contra side Clearing Broker (if other than normal Clearing Broker). For any transaction for which a member has recording and reporting obligations under Rules 7440 and 7450, the trade report must include an order identifier, meeting such parameters as may be prescribed by FINRA, assigned to the order that uniquely identifies the order for the date it was received. See Rule 7440(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to delete Rule 410B in its entirety. Rule 410B is a regulatory rule intended to enhance audit trail quality and improve surveillance and investigation of violative activities such as market manipulation and insider trading. As noted above, since 2010, surveillance and enforcement responsibilities across markets have been consolidated at FINRA, which conducts cross-market surveillances on the Exchange's behalf utilizing various data sources, including extensive trade and other information that FINRA collects pursuant to its rules. This trade information includes reports of off-exchange transactions. All of the Exchange's member organizations, with only nine exceptions, are members of FINRA and, as such, must report all off-exchange transactions to FINRA, including transactions away from the NYSE that are not reported to the Consolidated Tape. This information is essentially duplicative of the Rule 410B reports the Exchange currently supplies to FINRA. The one exception would be transactions in dually listed securities executed on and reported to a foreign securities exchange, which is not required to be reported because such trades are executed ``on or through an exchange.'' \19\ The Exchange believes [[Page 67445]] such trades pose little regulatory risk and, given that no other exchange has a rule comparable to Rule 410B, notes that such trades are also not being reported to other equities exchanges. The Exchange therefore believes that the rationale underlying the exclusion of these foreign on-exchange trades in dually listed securities from its reporting requirements should apply equally to NYSE-listed securities in the absence of Rule 410B. Finally, only a handful of firms currently account for all of the Rule 410B activity, all of whom are also FINRA members.\20\ Rule 410B is thus no longer necessary, and deleting it would eliminate essentially duplicative reporting of off-Exchange transactions by Dual Members. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See Trade Reporting Frequently Asked Questions, Section 701, Q/A701.1, available at http://www.finra.org/industry/trade-reporting-faq. See generally note 17, supra. \20\ Rule 410B Weekly Reports submitted to the SEC in July and August 2015 reveal that only five firms, all also FINRA members, accounted for all of the Rule 410B trading activity. Further, the list of firms that have in the past submitted Rule 410B reports does not include any non-FINRA members. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange does not believe that eliminating the Rule 410B reporting requirement for the small number of NYSE-only members \21\ would pose any significant regulatory risk. None of these firms has ever submitted a Rule 410B report. As noted above, a smaller number of Dual Member firms (five) account for all of the recent Rule 410B trading activity.\22\ The Exchange believes that retaining a reporting requirement for firms that have never triggered the requirement serves no useful regulatory or other purpose. NYSE-only members would remain subject to federal and Exchange books and records requirements.\23\ Information about any trades away from the Exchange by these firms should thus available for regulatory review if needed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ These nine non-FINRA member firms do not have any public customers and are also members of Nasdaq. Under Exchange rules, member organizations must be a member of FINRA or another registered securities exchange. See Rule 2(b)(i). \22\ See note 19, supra. \23\ See 17 CFR 240.17a-3, 17 CFR 240.17a-4 & Rule 440. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that Rule 410B should be deleted in its entirety. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,\24\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\25\ in particular, because it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In particular, the Exchange believes that eliminating Rule 410B would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by eliminating duplicative reporting by Dual Members of information those firms already provide to FINRA. The Exchange believes that eliminating Rule 410B reporting would not be inconsistent with the public interest and the protection of investors because FINRA would continue to receive information from Dual Members about off-Exchange transactions for incorporation in its cross- market surveillances. Further, the Exchange believes that eliminating Rule 410B reporting would not be inconsistent with the public interest and the protection of investors because the small number of NYSE-only firms that would no longer be subject to the reporting requirement have never submitted a report under the Rule. The Exchange further believes that deleting corresponding references to Rule 410B in another rule would remove impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market by reducing potential confusion and adding transparency and clarity to the Exchange's rules, thereby ensuring that members, regulators and the public can more easily navigate and understand the Exchange's rulebook. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not intended to address competitive issues, but rather it is designed to eliminate obsolete and duplicative regulatory reporting. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR-NYSE-2015-48 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2015-48. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only [[Page 67446]] information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2015-48 and should be submitted on or before November 23, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\26\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-27796 Filed 10-30-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices 67443
All submissions should refer to File 16, 2015, New York Stock Exchange pursuant to the Rule must contain the
Number SR–CHX–2015–05. This file LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed following information:
number should be included on the with the Securities and Exchange • Time and date of the transaction;
subject line if email is used. To help the Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the • stock symbol of the listed security;
Commission process and review your proposed rule change as described in • number of shares;
comments more efficiently, please use Items I, II, and III below, which Items • price;
only one method. The Commission will have been prepared by the self- • marketplace where the transaction
post all comments on the Commission’s regulatory organization. The was executed;
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ Commission is publishing this notice to • an indication whether the
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the solicit comments on the proposed rule transaction was a buy (B), sell (S) or
submission, all subsequent change from interested persons. cross (C);
amendments, all written statements • an indication whether the
with respect to the proposed rule I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
transaction was executed as principal or
change that are filed with the Statement of the Terms of Substance of
agent; and
the Proposed Rule Change
Commission, and all written • the name of the contra-side broker-
communications relating to the The Exchange proposes to delete Rule dealer to the trade.4
proposed rule change between the 410B governing reporting requirements Rule 410B was adopted in 1992. At
Commission and any person, other than for off-Exchange transactions. The text the time, transactions in NYSE-listed
those that may be withheld from the of the proposed rule change is available stocks effected outside of business hours
public in accordance with the on the Exchange’s Web site at or in foreign markets were not reported
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be www.nyse.com, at the principal office of to the Consolidated Tape and, with the
available for Web site viewing and the Exchange, and at the Commission’s exception of program trading
printing in the Commission’s Public Public Reference Room. information, were not reported to the
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Exchange. The Exchange (then the New
Washington, DC 20549–1090. Copies of II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s York Stock Exchange, Inc.) believed that
the filing will also be available for Statement of the Purpose of, and ‘‘all transactions in NYSE-listed stocks
inspection and copying at the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule that are not reported to the Consolidated
Exchange’s principal office. All Change Tape should be reported to the
comments received will be posted In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange in order to provide an
without change; the Commission does self-regulatory organization included accurate record of overall trading
not edit personal identifying activity in NYSE-listed stocks.’’ 5 The
statements concerning the purpose of,
information from submissions. You Rule 410B reporting requirement would
and basis for, the proposed rule change
should submit only information that thus ‘‘augment and enhance’’ the
and discussed any comments it received
you wish to make available publicly. All Exchange’s ability to ‘‘surveil for and
on the proposed rule change. The text
submissions should refer to File investigate, among other matters, insider
of those statements may be examined at
Number SR–CHX–2015–05 and should trading, frontrunning and manipulative
the places specified in Item IV below.
be submitted on or before November 23, activities’’ and ‘‘provide a more
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
2015. complete audit trail and depiction of
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
For the Commission, by the Division of of the most significant parts of such member trading in each NYSE-listed
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated statements. stock, which should facilitate
authority.25 surveillance by the Exchange in NYSE-
Robert W. Errett, A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s listed stocks.’’ 6
Deputy Secretary. Statement of the Purpose of, and the Despite the significant changes to the
[FR Doc. 2015–27792 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am] Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule marketplace and the regulatory
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Change landscape in the ensuing decades, Rule
1. Purpose 410B has not been substantively
amended since it was adopted.7
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE The Exchange proposes to delete Rule
COMMISSION 410B, which sets forth certain regulatory Changes to Regulatory Landscape
reporting requirements for member or On July 30, 2007, the NASD, NYSE,
[Release No. 34–76277; File No. SR–NYSE–
2015–48]
member organizations effecting off- and NYSE Regulation, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Exchange transactions in Exchange Regulation’’) consolidated their member
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New listed securities that are not reported to firm regulation operations to create the
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of the Consolidated Tape, and to make Financial Industry Regulatory
Filing of Proposed Rule Change conforming amendments to Rule 9217 to Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’), and entered
Deleting Rule 410B Governing delete a reference to Rule 410B. into a plan to allocate to FINRA
Reporting Requirements for Off- Background regulatory responsibility for common
Exchange Transactions rules and common members (‘‘17d–2
Rule 410B
October 27, 2015. 4 See Rule 410B.
Currently, Rule 410B requires
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 31358
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the members or member organizations to (October 26, 1992), 57 FR 1294 (January 6, 1992)
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 report to the Exchange transactions in (SR–NYSE–91–45) (‘‘Rule 410B Approval Order’’).
notice is hereby given that, on October NYSE-listed securities effected for the 6 See id., 57 FR at 1294.
account of a member or member 7 Rule 410B was amended in 2007 in connection
25 17 organization, or for the account of a with a filing updating the definition of program
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). trading in Rule 80A.40(b) to make conforming
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). customer of a member or member changes to the rule. See Securities Exchange Act
2 15 U.S.C. 78a. organization, that are not reported to the Release No. 55793 (May 22, 2007), 72 FR 29567
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Consolidated Tape. Reports prepared (May 29, 2007) (SR–NYSE–2007–34).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:55 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM 02NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_67654/page/1.svg)
![67446 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
information that you wish to make statements may be examined at the COA-eligible orders will COA by
available publicly. All submissions places specified in Item IV below. The default.5
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE– Exchange has prepared summaries, set The Exchange believes Participants
2015–48 and should be submitted on or forth in sections A, B, and C below, of should still maintain flexibility to have
before November 23, 2015. the most significant aspects of such their COA-eligible orders not COA. In
For the Commission, by the Division of statements. order to provide Participants with this
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated flexibility, the proposed rule change
authority.26 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s adds that, notwithstanding the
Robert W. Errett, Statement of the Purpose of, and foregoing, Participants may request on
Deputy Secretary. Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule an order-by-order basis that a COA-
[FR Doc. 2015–27796 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am]
Change eligible order not COA (referred to as a
‘‘do-not-COA’’ request). Because of this
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 1. Purpose proposed rule change, the Exchange
The Exchange proposes to amend deletes the language in Interpretation
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Rule 6.13 regarding complex orders. The and Policy .02(a) that indicates
COMMISSION proposed rule change (1) amends the Participants may request that complex
rule provisions regarding the initiation orders be processed by COA on a class-
[Release No. 34–76274; File No. SR–C2– by-class basis, as it is no longer
2015–025] of a complex order auction (‘‘COA’’), (2)
necessary.6 While the proposed rule
adds rule provisions regarding the
change will not permit Participants to
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 impact of certain incoming orders and
not COA orders on a class-by-class
Options Exchange, Incorporated; changes in the leg markets on an basis, the Exchange believes that it will
Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule ongoing COA, and (3) amends the rule not burden Participants because they
Change Relating to Complex Orders, provision related to the size of COA have not requested this in the past.
as Modified by Amendment No. 1 responses. The proposed rule change Additionally, allowing Participants to
also makes technical and other make a do-not-COA request on an order-
October 27, 2015.
nonsubstantive changes. by-order basis will better allow them to
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the First, the Exchange proposes to make decisions regarding the handling
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 amend Rule 6.13 and Interpretation and of their orders based on market
notice is hereby given that on October Policy .02 regarding the initiation of a conditions at the time they submit their
13, 2015, C2 Options Exchange, COA. Currently, C2 Rule 6.13(c)(2) orders.
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) provides that on receipt of a COA- While the proposed rule change
filed with the Securities and Exchange eligible order 3 and request from the provides that Participants may include
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the Participant representing the order that it a do-not-COA request on complex
proposed rule change as described in be processed through COA, the orders, the proposed rule change
Items I, II, and III below, which Items Exchange will send request for response indicates that an order with a do-not-
have been prepared by the Exchange. (‘‘RFR’’) message to all Participants who COA request may still COA after it has
On October 26, 2015, the Exchange have elected to receive RFR messages.4 rested on the COB pursuant to
submitted Amendment No. 1 to the Interpretation and Policy .02(a) states Interpretation and Policy .02.7 The
proposed rule change. The Commission Exchange believes that Participants that
that with respect to the initiation of a
is publishing this notice to solicit include a do-not-COA request for an
COA, Participants routing complex
comments on the proposed rule change order upon entry into the System do so
orders directly to the complex order
from interested persons. to receive automatic execution with the
book (‘‘COB’’) may request that the leg market or the COB, as applicable,
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s complex orders be processed by COA on without the delay of the COA.8
Statement of the Terms of Substance of a class-by-class basis. Currently, all
the Proposed Rule Change Participants have requested that all of 5 This proposed rule change applies to all COA-
their COA-eligible orders process eligible orders in all classes. Stock-option orders are
The Exchange proposed to amend through COA upon entry into the currently not permitted on C2. The proposed rule
Rule 6.13. The text of the proposed rule change does not change the allocation or priority
System. Therefore, rather than have
change is available on the Exchange’s provisions of complex orders. The proposed rule
Participants affirmatively request that change also makes a nonsubstantive change to move
Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/
their COA-eligible orders COA, the language regarding the System sending RFR
Legal/), at the Exchange’s Office of the messages to the beginning of the provision.
Exchange proposes to amend Rule
Secretary, and at the Commission’s 6 The proposed rule change deletes Interpretation
6.13(c)(2) to provide that incoming
Public Reference Room. and Policy .02(a) in order to include all information
regarding the initiation of a COA in subparagraph
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 3 A ‘‘COA-eligible order’’ means a complex order (c)(2) in the same place within the rule. As a result,
Statement of the Purpose of, and that, as determined by the Exchange on class-by- the proposed rule change deletes the lettering for
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule class basis, is eligible for a COA considering the paragraph (b), which will be the only remaining
order’s marketability (defined as a number of tickets provision in Interpretation and Policy .02. The
Change away from the current market), size, complex order proposed rule change makes nonsubstantive
In its filing with the Commission, the type and complex order origin types. Currently, in changes to Rule 6.13(c) as well, including a change
all classes, (a) only complex orders with origin to conform heading punctuation to that used in
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Exchange included statements codes for public and professional customers, (b) all other headings and deletion of an extra space.
concerning the purpose of and basis for complex order types except for immediate-or-cancel 7 Interpretation and Policy .02(b) (which the
the proposed rule change and discussed (‘‘IOC’’) orders, and (c) marketable orders and proposed rule change amends to become
any comments it received on the ‘‘tweeners’’ limit orders bettering the same side of Interpretation and Policy .02) provides that the
the derived net market are eligible for COA. Exchange may determine on a class-by-class basis
proposed rule change. The text of these 4 ‘‘RFR’’ stands for a ‘‘request for responses’’ that to automatically COA nonmarketable orders resting
occurs in the COA process. The RFR message will at the top of the COB if they are within a number
26 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). identify the component series, the size and side of of ticks away from the current derived net market.
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). the market of the COA-eligible order and any 8 The current COA response time interval is 75
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. contingencies if applicable. milliseconds.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:55 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM 02NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_67654/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-01 11:30:01
Document Modified: 2018-03-01 11:30:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | (1) Security Identification Symbol of the eligible security (SECID); (2) number of shares or bonds; (3) unit price, excluding commissions, mark-ups or mark- downs; (4) time of execution expressed in hours, minutes and seconds based on Eastern Time in military format, unless another provision of FINRA rules requires that a different time be included on the report; (5) a symbol indicating whether the party submitting the trade report represents the Reporting Member (denoted as the Executing Party or ``EPID'') side or the Non-Reporting Party (denoted as the Contra Party or ``CPID'') side; (6) a symbol indicating whether the transaction is a buy, sell or cross, and if applicable, a symbol indicating that the transaction is a sell short or sell short exempt trade from the Reporting Member perspective or contra side perspective, irrespective of whether the contra side is a member; (7) a symbol indicating whether the trade is as principal, riskless principal, or agent; (8) reporting side Clearing Broker (if other than normal Clearing Broker); (9) reporting side executing broker in the case of a give up agreement, as defined in Rule 6380B(g); (10) contra side executing broker; (11) contra side Introducing Broker in the case of a give up agreement, as defined in Rule 6380B(g); and (12) contra side Clearing Broker (if other than normal Clearing Broker). For any transaction for which a member has recording and reporting obligations under Rules 7440 and 7450, the trade report must include an order identifier, meeting such parameters as may be prescribed by FINRA, assigned to the order that uniquely identifies the order for the date it was received. See Rule 7440(b)(1). | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 67443 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR