80 FR 69644 - Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 217 (November 10, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 217 (November 10, 2015)
| Page Range | 69644-69646 | |
| FR Document | 2015-28644 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 217 (Tuesday, November 10, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 69644-69646] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-28644] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-983] Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 7, 2015, the Department of Commerce (Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on drawn stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ The review covers seven producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, including the following mandatory respondents: Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd. (Dongyuan) and Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd. (Yingao). The period of review (POR) is October 4, 2012, through March 31, 2014. We provided interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. After reviewing the comments received and making corrections to the margin calculations, where appropriate, we continue to find that Dongyuan and Yingao both made sales of subject merchandise to the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. The final dumping margins are listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of the Review.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 80 FR 26227 (May 7, 2015) (Preliminary Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective date: November 10, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian C. Smith or Reza Karamloo, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 and (202) 482-4470, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background For a description of events that have occurred since the publication of the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's AD and Countervailing Duty (CVD) Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014,'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The products covered by the order include drawn stainless steel sinks. Imports of subject merchandise are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the [[Page 69645]] Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix I. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain revisions to the margin calculations for Dongyuan, Yingao, and the separate rate respondents.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ For further explanation regarding these changes, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rate Respondents In the Preliminary Results, we determined that the mandatory respondents, Dongyuan and Yingao, and the following separate rate applicant companies satisfied the criteria for separate rate status: Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd.; Guangdong New Shichu Import & Export Company Limited; Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd.; Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development Corporation Limited; and Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd.\5\ We received no comments or arguments since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provide a basis for reconsideration of our decision with respect to these companies. Therefore, the Department continues to find that the companies listed above meet the criteria for a separate rate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR 26228; see also Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China'' (April 30, 2015) (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), at 6-9. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rate for Non-Examined Separate Rate Respondents In the Preliminary Results, we assigned an average of the weighted- average dumping margins assigned to Dongyuan and Yingao to the non- individually examined companies that are eligible for a separate rate (i.e., the separate rate applicant companies). No parties commented on the methodology for calculating this separate rate. Therefore, in these final results of the review, we continue to use an average of the weighted-average dumping margins assigned to Dongyuan and Yingao,\6\ which is 4.29 percent, as the rate for those companies which were not examined and which are eligible for a separate rate. The separate rate applicant companies receiving this rate are identified by name and listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of the Review.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Memorandum to the File from Brian Smith, Team Leader, ``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Calculation of the Final Margin for Separate Rate Companies,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum (Final Results Separate Rate Calculation Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Review In the Preliminary Results, the Department found that Feidong Import & Export Co., Ltd.; Shunde Native Produce Import & Export Co, Ltd. of Guangdong; and Zhongshan Silk Import & Export Group Co., Ltd. of Guangdong were not eligible for a separate rate, and therefore, were part of the PRC-wide entity.\7\ Because the status of these companies has not changed since the Preliminary Results, we continue to find that they are ineligible for a separate rate and part of the PRC-wide entity. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity and the Department no longer considers the PRC-wide entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews,\8\ we did not conduct a review of the PRC-wide entity. Thus, the rate for the PRC-wide entity is not subject to change as a result of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 10-12. \8\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 4, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For companies subject to this review, which established their eligibility for a separate rate, the Department finds that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period October 4, 2012, through March 31, 2014: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporters dumping margin \9\ (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd.............................. 4.29 Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd.......... 2.82 Guangdong New Shichu Import & Export Company Limited........ 4.29 Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd.................. 8.06 Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd.............................. 4.29 Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development Corporation Limited 4.29 Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd...................... 4.29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rates --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ These rates have been adjusted for the estimated domestic subsidy pass-through. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this administrative review. For each individually examined respondent in this review (i.e., Dongyuan and Yingao) which has a weighted-average dumping margin which is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate importer- (or customer-) specific per-unit duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's (or customer's) examined sales to the total sales quantity associated with those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\10\ Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-(or customer-) specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ In these final results, the Department continues to apply the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the respondents which were not selected for individual examination in this administrative review and which qualified for a separate rate, the assessment rate is equal to the average of the weighted-average dumping margins assigned to Dongyuan and Yingao, or 4.29 percent. For the companies identified above as part of the PRC-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 76.45 \11\ percent to all entries of subject merchandise during [[Page 69646]] the POR which were produced and/or exported by those companies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ The PRC-wide rate determined in the investigation was 76.53 percent. See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 21592, 21594 (April 11, 2013). This rate was adjusted for export subsidies and estimated domestic subsidy pass through to determine the cash deposit rate (76.45 percent) collected for companies in the PRC-wide entity. See explanation in Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Investigation, Final Determination, 78 FR 13019, 13025 (February 26, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department has refined its assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (NME Antidumping Proceedings). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that rate established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will be established for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, which is 76.45 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure The Department intends to disclose to the parties the calculations performed for these final results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act. Dated: November 2, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Margin Calculations V. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1. Eligibility of Respondents for a ``Double Remedy'' Pass-Through Adjustment Comment 2. Subsidy Rates Used as the Basis for the ``Double Remedy'' Pass-Through Adjustment Comment 3. Use of Bloomberg Data Comment 4. Statutory Authority To Consider an Alternative Comparison Method Comment 5. Notice and Comment Process Necessary for New Differential Pricing Analysis Comment 6. Differential Pricing Analysis Comment 7. Zeroing Comment 8. Definition of Purchaser and Region in the Cohen's d Test Comment 9. Surrogate Financial Ratios Comment 10. Stainless Steel Surrogate Value Comment 11. Treatment of Labor Expenses in the Financial Ratios and Adjustment To Labor Surrogate Value Comment 12. Calculation of the Labor Surrogate Value Comment 13. Truck Freight Surrogate Value Comment 14. Inclusion of Letter of Credit Costs in the Brokerage and Handling Surrogate Value Comment 15. Weight Adjustment Made to the Brokerage and Handling and Truck Surrogate Values Comment 16. Wooden Box Factor Calculation for Yingao Comment 17. Packing Material Consumption Weights for Yingao Comment 18. Dongyuan Reported Gross Weights Comment 19. Separate Rate Eligibility for Feidong VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-28644 Filed 11-9-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![69644 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 217 / Tuesday, November 10, 2015 / Notices
Operations, Enforcement and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On inadvertent errors in the chart
Compliance, International Trade October 15, 2015, the Department of containing the weighted-average
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department) published margins. Specifically, certain exporter
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution the preliminary affirmative less than fair names were matched with the incorrect
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; value determination on certain producer names. The chart below
telephone: (202) 482–1131. polyethylene terephthalate resin from contains the correct combinations of
the People’s Republic of China.1 The names:
Preliminary Determination contained
Weighted-
average
Exporter Producer margin
(percent)
Far Eastern Industries (Shanghai) Ltd. or Oriental Industries Far Eastern Industries (Shanghai) Ltd. or Oriental Industries 125.12
(Suzhou) Limited. (Suzhou) Limited.
Jiangyin Xingyu New Material Co., Ltd. or Jiangsu Xingye Jiangyin Xingyu New Material Co., Ltd. or Jiangsu Xingye 131.16
Plastic Co., Ltd. or Jiangyin Xingjia Plastic Co., Ltd. or Plastic Co., Ltd. or Jiangyin Xingjia Plastic Co., Ltd. or
Jiangyin Xingtai New Material Co., Ltd. or Jiangsu Xingye Jiangyin Xingtai New Material Co., Ltd. or Jiangsu Xingye
Polytech Co., Ltd. Polytech Co., Ltd.
Dragon Special Resin (XIAMEN) Co., Ltd .................................. Dragon Special Resin (XIAMEN) Co., Ltd ................................. 129.42
Hainan Yisheng Petrochemical Co., Ltd ..................................... Hainan Yisheng Petrochemical Co., Ltd .................................... 129.42
Shanghai Hengyi Polyester Fiber Co., Ltd ................................. Shanghai Hengyi Polyester Fiber Co., Ltd ................................ 129.42
Zhejiang Wankai New Materials Co., Ltd ................................... Zhejiang Wankai New Materials Co., Ltd .................................. 129.42
PRC-Wide Entity ......................................................................... .................................................................................................... 145.94
This correction to the Preliminary Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd. Decision Memorandum.2 The Issues and
Determination is issued and published (Dongyuan) and Guangdong Yingao Decision Memorandum is a public
in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd. (Yingao). The document and is on file electronically
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. period of review (POR) is October 4, via Enforcement and Compliance’s AD
Dated: November 4, 2015. 2012, through March 31, 2014. We and Countervailing Duty (CVD)
Paul Piquado,
provided interested parties an Centralized Electronic Service System
opportunity to comment on the (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Preliminary Results. After reviewing the registered users at http://
comments received and making access.trade.gov and in the Central
[FR Doc. 2015–28665 Filed 11–9–15; 8:45 am]
corrections to the margin calculations, Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
where appropriate, we continue to find Department of Commerce building. In
that Dongyuan and Yingao both made addition, a complete version of the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE sales of subject merchandise to the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
United States at prices below normal be accessed directly at http://
International Trade Administration value (NV) during the POR. The final enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
dumping margins are listed below in the The signed Issues and Decision
[A–570–983] section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the Memorandum and the electronic
Review.’’ version of the Issues and Decision
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
DATES: Effective date: November 10, Memorandum are identical in content.
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of the Antidumping Duty 2015. Scope of the Order
Administrative Review; 2012–2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The products covered by the order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Brian C. Smith or Reza Karamloo, AD/ include drawn stainless steel sinks.
International Trade Administration, CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement Imports of subject merchandise are
Department of Commerce. and Compliance, International Trade currently classified under the
SUMMARY: On May 7, 2015, the Administration, U.S. Department of Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
Department of Commerce (Department) Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue United States (HTSUS) subheadings
published the preliminary results of the NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010.
administrative review of the (202) 482–1766 and (202) 482–4470, Although the HTSUS subheadings are
antidumping duty (AD) order on drawn respectively. provided for convenience and customs
stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) from SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: purposes, the written description of the
the People’s Republic of China (PRC).1 scope of the order is dispositive.3
The review covers seven producers/ Background
Analysis of Comments Received
exporters of the subject merchandise, For a description of events that have
including the following mandatory occurred since the publication of the All issues raised in the case and
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
respondents: Guangdong Dongyuan Preliminary Results, see the Issues and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
1 See Certain Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 80 FR Republic of China: Issues and Decision
from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary 26227 (May 7, 2015) (Preliminary Results). Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 2 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
Postponement of Final Determination, 80 FR 62024 Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from 2014,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted
(October 15, 2015) (Preliminary Determination). Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
1 See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 3 For a complete description of the Scope of the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of ‘‘Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:41 Nov 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM 10NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_69861/page/1.svg)
![69646 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 217 / Tuesday, November 10, 2015 / Notices
the POR which were produced and/or Notification to Importers Comment 11. Treatment of Labor Expenses
exported by those companies. in the Financial Ratios and Adjustment
This notice also serves as a final To Labor Surrogate Value
The Department has refined its reminder to importers of their Comment 12. Calculation of the Labor
assessment practice in NME cases. responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Surrogate Value
Pursuant to this refinement in practice, to file a certificate regarding the Comment 13. Truck Freight Surrogate
for entries that were not reported in the reimbursement of antidumping and/or Value
U.S. sales databases submitted by Comment 14. Inclusion of Letter of Credit
countervailing duties prior to Costs in the Brokerage and Handling
companies individually examined liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review, the Department will Surrogate Value
during this POR. Failure to comply with Comment 15. Weight Adjustment Made to
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at this requirement could result in the the Brokerage and Handling and Truck
the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the Department’s presumption that Surrogate Values
Department determines that an exporter reimbursement of antidumping and/or Comment 16. Wooden Box Factor
under review had no shipments of the countervailing duties occurred and the Calculation for Yingao
subject merchandise, any suspended subsequent assessment of doubled Comment 17. Packing Material
entries that entered under that antidumping duties. Consumption Weights for Yingao
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that Comment 18. Dongyuan Reported Gross
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the Notification Regarding Administrative Weights
PRC-wide rate.12 Protective Order Comment 19. Separate Rate Eligibility for
Feidong
Cash Deposit Requirements This notice also serves as a reminder VI. Recommendation
to parties subject to administrative [FR Doc. 2015–28644 Filed 11–9–15; 8:45 am]
The following cash deposit protective order (APO) of their BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
requirements will be effective upon responsibility concerning the return or
publication of the final results of this destruction of proprietary information
administrative review for all shipments disclosed under APO in accordance
of the subject merchandise from the PRC BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which PROTECTION
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, continues to govern business
for consumption on or after the proprietary information in this segment [Docket No: CFPB–2015–0047]
publication date, as provided for by of the proceeding. Timely written
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Agency Information Collection
notification of the return or destruction
the companies listed above that have a Activities: Comment Request
of APO materials, or conversion to
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will judicial protective order, is hereby AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial
be that rate established in the final requested. Failure to comply with the Protection.
results of this review (except, if the rate regulations and terms of an APO is a ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
is zero or de minimis, then a cash violation which is subject to sanction.
deposit rate of zero will be established SUMMARY: In accordance with the
for that company); (2) for previously This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
investigated or reviewed PRC and non- (PRA), the Consumer Financial
PRC exporters that received a separate 777(i)(l) of the Act.
Protection Bureau (Bureau) is requesting
rate in a prior segment of this Dated: November 2, 2015. to renew the Office of Management and
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will Paul Piquado, Budget (OMB) approval for an existing
continue to be the existing exporter- Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and information collection, and to revise an
specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of Compliance. existing information collection, titled,
subject merchandise that have not been ‘‘Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation
found to be entitled to a separate rate, Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum C) 12 CFR 1003.’’
the cash deposit rate will be the rate for
DATES: Written comments are
the PRC-wide entity, which is 76.45 I. Summary
II. Background
encouraged and must be received on or
percent; and (4) for all non-PRC
III. Scope of the Order before January 11, 2016 to be assured of
exporters of subject merchandise which
IV. Margin Calculations consideration.
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate V. Discussion of the Issues ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
Comment 1. Eligibility of Respondents for identified by the title of the information
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that a ‘‘Double Remedy’’ Pass-Through
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These collection, OMB Control Number (see
Adjustment below), and docket number (see above),
deposit requirements, when imposed, Comment 2. Subsidy Rates Used as the
shall remain in effect until further Basis for the ‘‘Double Remedy’’ Pass-
by any of the following methods:
notice. Through Adjustment • Electronic: http://
Comment 3. Use of Bloomberg Data www.regulations.gov. Follow the
Disclosure Comment 4. Statutory Authority To instructions for submitting comments.
Consider an Alternative Comparison • Mail: Consumer Financial
The Department intends to disclose to Method Protection Bureau (Attention: PRA
the parties the calculations performed Comment 5. Notice and Comment Process Office), 1700 G Street NW., Washington,
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
for these final results within five days Necessary for New Differential Pricing DC 20552.
of the date of publication of this notice Analysis • Hand Delivery/Courier: Consumer
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Comment 6. Differential Pricing Analysis
Financial Protection Bureau (Attention:
Comment 7. Zeroing
Comment 8. Definition of Purchaser and PRA Office), 1275 First Street NE.,
12 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-
Region in the Cohen’s d Test Washington, DC 20002.
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 Comment 9. Surrogate Financial Ratios Please note that comments submitted
(October 24, 2011) (NME Antidumping Comment 10. Stainless Steel Surrogate after the comment period will not be
Proceedings). Value accepted. In general, all comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:41 Nov 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM 10NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_69861/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-01 11:25:20
Document Modified: 2018-03-01 11:25:20
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective date: November 10, 2015. | |
| Contact | Brian C. Smith or Reza Karamloo, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 and (202) 482-4470, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 69644 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR