80 FR 69942 - Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 218 (November 12, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 218 (November 12, 2015)
| Page Range | 69942-69944 | |
| FR Document | 2015-28757 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 218 (Thursday, November 12, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 69942-69944] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-28757] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-918] Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On July 15, 2015, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') published the Preliminary Results of the sixth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel wire garment hangers from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments and information received, we made no changes to the final margin calculations of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. (``Shanghai Wells'').\2\ We continue to find Ningbo Dasheng Hanger Industry Co., Ltd. (``Ningbo Dasheng'') is not eligible for separate rate status and, therefore, is part of the PRC-wide entity. Listed below in the ``Final Results of the Administrative Review'' section of this notice are the final dumping margins. The period of review (``POR'') is October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 41480 (July 15, 2015) (``Preliminary Results''). \2\ The Department previously found that Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (``HK Wells'') and Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (USA) (``Wells USA'') are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. and HK Wells comprise a single entity (collectively, ``Shanghai Wells''). Because there were no changes in this review to the facts that supported that decision, we continue to find Shanghai Wells, HK Wells, and USA Wells are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells and HK Wells comprise a single entity. See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 68758, 68761 (November 9, 2010), unchanged in First Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 27994, 27996 (May 13, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: November 12, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Polovina, Alexander Komisar, or Kathleen Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3927, (202) 482-7425, or (202) 482-7906, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department published the Preliminary Results on July 15, 2015. On August 24, 2015, M&B Metal Products Inc., (``Petitioner''), U.S. Distributors,\3\ Aristocraft of America LLC (``Aristocraft''), and Ningbo Dasheng submitted case briefs. On September 1, 2015, Petitioner submitted a rebuttal brief. On September 9, 2015, the Department held a public hearing where counsel for Petitioner, U.S. Distributors, and Aristocraft, presented issues raised in their case and rebuttal briefs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ FabriClean Supply Inc., Best For Less Dry Cleaners Supply LLC, Ideal Chemical & Supply Company, Laundry & Cleaners Supply Inc., Rocky Mountain Hanger MFG Co., Rosenberg Supply Co., Ltd, and ZTN Management Company, LLC, (collectively, ``U.S. Distributors''). The U.S. Distributors include importers of subject merchandise and a wholesaler of domestic like product. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise that is subject to the order is steel wire garment hangers. The products subject to the order are currently classified under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (``HTSUS'') subheadings 7326.20.0020, 7323.99.9060, and 7323.99.9080. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise remains dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,\4\ which is hereby adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See the Department's Memorandum, titled ``Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Sixth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated concurrently with this notice (``Issues and Decision Memorandum''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 69943]] Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\ A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRC-Wide Entity Shaoxing Dingli and the Shaoxing Entity \6\ failed to respond to the Department's requests for information.\7\ These companies, therefore, are not eligible for separate rate status.\8\ Additionally, Ningbo Dasheng failed to adequately respond to all parts of the questionnaire, and therefore, is also not eligible for a separate rate.\9\ Accordingly, the Department finds that the PRC-wide entity includes these companies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ We selected two companies for individual examination, however, these two companies failed to respond. These companies are: 1) Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd., (``Shaoxing Dingli''); and 2) Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufacture (collectively, ``the Shaoxing Entity''). \7\ See Preliminary Results, at ``Respondent Selection'' section. \8\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 70850, 70851 (November 28, 2014). \9\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at Comment 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Administrative Review Regarding the administrative review, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd.\10\........................ 33.24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ This rate applies to the single entity comprised of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., and Hong Kong Wells Ltd. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, we calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to each importer (or customer).\11\ Where the Department calculated a weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will direct CBP to assess importer-specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit rates.\12\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation.\13\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \12\ Id. \13\ Id. \14\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above, the cash deposit rate will be established in the final results of these reviews (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 187.25 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. We request a timely written notification of the return or destruction [[Page 69944]] of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: November 5, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: PRC-wide Treatment for Ningbo Dasheng Comment 2: Selection of Financial Statements Comment 3: Whether to Adjust U.S Prices for Un-refunded Value-Added Tax (``VAT'') Comment 4: Whether the Thai AUV for Corrugated Paper Is Aberrational Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Revise the Surrogate Value for Brokerage and Handling (``B&H'') Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-28757 Filed 11-10-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![69942 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices
review; (2) for merchandise exported by Dated: November 4, 2015. find Ningbo Dasheng Hanger Industry
manufacturers or exporters not covered Paul Piquado, Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo Dasheng’’) is not
in this administrative review but Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and eligible for separate rate status and,
covered in a prior segment of the Compliance. therefore, is part of the PRC-wide entity.
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of the
continue to be the company specific rate Final Issues and Decision Memorandum Administrative Review’’ section of this
published for the most recently notice are the final dumping margins.
I. Summary
completed segment of this proceeding; II. Issues The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is October
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered III. Background 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014.
in this review, a prior review, or the IV. Scope of the Order DATES: Effective Date: November 12,
original investigation, but the V. Discussion of Interested Party Comments 2015.
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate Comment 1: Discounts Granted on Home-
Market Sales FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
will be the rate established for the most
Comment 2: The Proper Universe of Sales Alexis Polovina, Alexander Komisar, or
recently completed segment of this
Comment 3: Certain Home-Market Insurance Kathleen Marksberry, AD/CVD
proceeding for the manufacturer of the Expenses Operations, Office V, Enforcement and
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash VI. Recommendation Compliance, International Trade
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
[FR Doc. 2015–28752 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am] Administration, Department of
or exporters will continue to be 3.76
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
percent, the all-others rate established
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
in the antidumping investigation.7
telephone: (202) 482–3927, (202) 482–
These cash deposit requirements, when DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 7425, or (202) 482–7906, respectively.
imposed, shall remain in effect until
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
further notice. International Trade Administration
Notification to Importers Regarding the Background
[A–570–918]
Reimbursement of Duties The Department published the
This notice also serves as a final Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the Preliminary Results on July 15, 2015. On
reminder to importers of their People’s Republic of China: Final August 24, 2015, M&B Metal Products
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Results of Antidumping Duty Inc., (‘‘Petitioner’’), U.S. Distributors,3
to file a certificate regarding the Administrative Review, 2013–2014 Aristocraft of America LLC
reimbursement of antidumping and/or (‘‘Aristocraft’’), and Ningbo Dasheng
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
countervailing duties prior to submitted case briefs. On September 1,
International Trade Administration,
liquidation of the relevant entries 2015, Petitioner submitted a rebuttal
Department of Commerce.
during the POR. Failure to comply with brief. On September 9, 2015, the
SUMMARY: On July 15, 2015, the
this requirement could result in the Department held a public hearing where
Department of Commerce (‘‘the counsel for Petitioner, U.S. Distributors,
Department’s presumption that Department’’) published the Preliminary
reimbursement of antidumping and/or and Aristocraft, presented issues raised
Results of the sixth administrative in their case and rebuttal briefs.
countervailing duties occurred and the review of the antidumping duty order
subsequent assessment of doubled on steel wire garment hangers from the Scope of the Order
antidumping duties. People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The merchandise that is subject to the
Administrative Protective Order We invited parties to comment on the order is steel wire garment hangers. The
Preliminary Results. Based on our products subject to the order are
This notice also serves as a reminder analysis of the comments and
to parties subject to administrative currently classified under U.S.
information received, we made no Harmonized Tariff Schedule (‘‘HTSUS’’)
protective orders (APO) of their changes to the final margin calculations
responsibility concerning the return or subheadings 7326.20.0020,
of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. 7323.99.9060, and 7323.99.9080.
destruction of proprietary information (‘‘Shanghai Wells’’).2 We continue to
disclosed under APO in accordance Although the HTSUS subheadings are
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which provided for convenience and customs
1 See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the
continues to govern business purposes, the written description of the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
proprietary information in this segment Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013± merchandise remains dispositive. A full
of the proceeding. Timely written 2014, 80 FR 41480 (July 15, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary description of the scope of the order is
notification of the return/destruction of Results’’). contained in the Issues and Decision
2 The Department previously found that Shanghai
APO materials, or conversion to judicial Memorandum,4 which is hereby
Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (‘‘HK
protective order, is hereby requested. Wells’’) and Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (USA) (‘‘Wells
adopted by this notice.
Failure to comply with the regulations USA’’) are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells
3 FabriClean Supply Inc., Best For Less Dry
and the terms of an APO is a Hanger Co., Ltd. and HK Wells comprise a single
entity (collectively, ‘‘Shanghai Wells’’). Because Cleaners Supply LLC, Ideal Chemical & Supply
sanctionable violation. there were no changes in this review to the facts Company, Laundry & Cleaners Supply Inc., Rocky
We are issuing and publishing this that supported that decision, we continue to find Mountain Hanger MFG Co., Rosenberg Supply Co.,
notice in accordance with sections Shanghai Wells, HK Wells, and USA Wells are Ltd, and ZTN Management Company, LLC,
affiliated and that Shanghai Wells and HK Wells (collectively, ‘‘U.S. Distributors’’). The U.S.
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 Distributors include importers of subject
comprise a single entity. See Steel Wire Garment
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CFR 351.213(h). Hangers From the People's Republic of China: merchandise and a wholesaler of domestic like
Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in product.
7 See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube Part, of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative 4 See the Department’s Memorandum, titled
from Mexico, the People's Republic of China, and Review, 75 FR 68758, 68761 (November 9, 2010), ‘‘Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the People’s
the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders; unchanged in First Administrative Review of Steel Republic of China: Issues and Decision
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic Memorandum for the Final Results of the Sixth
Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR concurrently with this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision
FR 45403, 45404 (August 5, 2008). 27994, 27996 (May 13, 2011). Memorandum’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM 12NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_70160/page/1.svg)
![69944 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices
of APO materials, or conversion to review (POR) is November 1, 2013, Preliminary Decision Memorandum,4
judicial protective order. Failure to through October 31, 2014. remains dispositive.
comply with the regulations and terms No interested party submitted Final Results of the Review
of an APO is a violation which is subject comments on the preliminary results.
to sanction. We made no changes to the margin We determine that a weighted-average
We are issuing and publishing this calculation for the final results of this dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists
administrative review and notice in review. Therefore, the final results do for entries of subject merchandise that
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and not differ from the preliminary results. were produced and/or exported by GD
777(i) of the Act. The final weighted-average dumping Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V. and that
margin for Golden Dragon is listed entered, or were withdrawn from
Dated: November 5, 2015.
below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ warehouse, for consumption during the
Paul Piquado, POR.
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
section of this notice.
Compliance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assessment Rates
Elizabeth Eastwood or Dennis McClure, The Department shall determine, and
Appendix—Issues and Decision
AD/CVD Operations, Office II, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Memorandum
Enforcement and Compliance, (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision International Trade Administration, on all appropriate entries. Pursuant to
Memorandum U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th the Final Modification for Reviews,5
Summary Street and Constitution Avenue NW., because the weighted-average dumping
Background Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) margins for Golden Dragon is zero, we
Scope of the Order 482–3874 or (202) 482–5973, will instruct CBP to liquidate the
Discussion of the Issues respectively. appropriate entries without regard to
Comment 1: PRC-wide Treatment for Ningbo
Dasheng SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: antidumping duties.6
Comment 2: Selection of Financial For entries of subject merchandise
Statements Background during the POR produced by Golden
Comment 3: Whether to Adjust U.S Prices for The review covers one producer/ Dragon for which it did not know its
Un-refunded Value-Added Tax (‘‘VAT’’) exporter of the subject merchandise, merchandise was destined for the
Comment 4: Whether the Thai AUV for
Golden Dragon. On August 10, 2015, the United States, we will instruct CBP to
Corrugated Paper Is Aberrational liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-
Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Department published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of others rate if there is no rate for the
Revise the Surrogate Value for Brokerage intermediate company(ies) involved in
and Handling (‘‘B&H’’) administrative review of the
Recommendation antidumping duty order on seamless the transaction.7
refined copper pipe and tube from The Department intends to issue
[FR Doc. 2015–28757 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am] assessment instructions to CBP 41 days
Mexico.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P after the date of publication of these
We invited parties to comment on the
final results of review, pursuant to 19
preliminary results of the review. No
CFR 356.8(a).
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE interested party submitted comments.
The Department conducted this Cash Deposit Requirements
International Trade Administration administrative review in accordance The following deposit requirements
[A–201–838]
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of will be effective upon publication of the
1930, as amended (the Act). notice of these final results for all
Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Scope of the Order shipments of seamless refined copper
Tube From Mexico: Final Results of pipe and tube from Mexico entered, or
Antidumping Duty Administrative The merchandise subject to the order 3 withdrawn from warehouse, for
Review; 2013–2014 is seamless refined copper pipe and consumption on or after the publication
tube. The product is currently classified date as provided by section 751(a)(2) of
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for
International Trade Administration, of the United States (HTSUS) Golden Dragon will be 0.00 percent, the
Department of Commerce. subheadings 7407.10.1500, weighted average dumping margin
SUMMARY: On August 10, 2015, the 7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and established in the final results of this
Department of Commerce (the 8415.90.8085. Although the HTSUS administrative review; (2) for
Department) published the preliminary numbers are provided for convenience merchandise exported by manufacturers
results of the administrative review of and customs purposes, the written or exporters not covered in this review
the antidumping duty order on seamless product description, available in the but covered in a completed prior
refined copper pipe and tube from segment of the proceeding, the cash
Mexico.1 The review covers one Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.; (4) GD deposit rate will continue to be the
producer/exporter of the subject Copper U.S.A. Inc.; (5) GD Affiliates Servicios S. de
merchandise, GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de R.L. de C.V.; and (6) GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V.,
4 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
which is collectively referred to as Golden Dragon.
C.V. (Golden Dragon).2 The period of See, e.g., Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4.
5 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube New Shipper Review, 77 FR 59178 (September 26, the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
From Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 2012), and accompanying Issues and Decision Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Duty Administrative Review; 2013±2014, 80 FR Memorandum. Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
47908 (August 10, 2015) (Preliminary Results), and 3 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. From Mexico and the People's Republic of China: Reviews).
2 The Department previously treated GD Affiliates 6 Id. at 8102.
Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final
S. de R.L. de C.V. as part of a single entity Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value 7 For a full discussion, see Antidumping and
including: (1) GD Copper Cooperatief U.A.; (2) Hong From Mexico, 75 FR 71070 (November 22, 2010) Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of
Kong GD Trading Co. Ltd.; (3) Golden Dragon (Amended Final and Order). Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM 12NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_70160/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 14:53:26
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 14:53:26
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Alexis Polovina, Alexander Komisar, or Kathleen Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3927, (202) 482-7425, or (202) 482-7906, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 69942 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR