80 FR 71892 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to Fees for BZX Options

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 221 (November 17, 2015)

Page Range		71892-71895
FR Document		2015-29231
Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 221 (Tuesday, November 17, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 221 (Tuesday, November 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71892-71895]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-76411; File No. SR-BATS-2015-98]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to 
Fees for BZX Options

November 10, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on November 2, 2015, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or 
changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange 
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) 
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon 
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend the fee schedule applicable 
to Members \5\ and non-members of the Exchange pursuant to BATS Rules 
15.1(a) and (c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The term ``Member'' is defined as ``any registered broker or 
dealer that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.'' See 
Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such 
statements.

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to modify its fee schedule applicable to the 
Exchange's options platform effective immediately, in order to: (i) 
Make certain changes, including the adoption of routing fees, in 
connection with the launch of the options exchange operated by the 
Exchange's affiliate EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX Options''); and (ii) 
to adopt and modify certain pricing tiers offered by the Exchange.
BZX Options References
    At the outset, the Exchange proposes to re-brand its options 
platform as BZX Options, rather than BATS Options, as it intends to use 
BATS Options to describe EDGX Options and BZX Options collectively. In 
connection with this change the Exchange proposes to: (i) Re-title the 
fee schedule; (ii) modify the description of fee code OO, which refers 
to the Exchange's opening process; (iii) modify references in footnote 
5, which applies to the Quoting Incentive Program (``QIP''); (iv) 
modify references in the Unicast Access section under BATS Connect 
fees; and (v) modify references in the Options Regulatory Fee section. 
In each instance the Exchange proposes to refer to BZX Options. With 
respect to the Unicast Access section, the Exchange also proposes to 
add reference to EDGX Options in the list of Exchange affiliates to 
which such fees do not apply.
Routing to EDGX Options
    As noted previously, the Exchange's current approach to routing 
fees is to set forth in a simple manner certain sub-categories of fees 
that approximate the cost of routing to other options exchanges based 
on the cost of transaction fees assessed by each venue as well as costs 
to the Exchange for routing (i.e., clearing fees, connectivity and 
other infrastructure costs, membership fees, etc.) (collectively, 
``Routing Costs''). The Exchange then monitors the fees charged as 
compared to the costs of its routing services and adjusts its routing 
fees and/or sub-categories to ensure that the Exchange's fees do indeed 
result in a rough approximation of overall Routing Costs, and are not 
significantly higher or lower in any area. The Exchange proposes to 
adopt routing fees for orders that are routed by the Exchange to EDGX 
Options consistent with this approach.
    The Exchange proposes to adopt fee codes RC and RD, which will 
apply to Customer \6\ orders routed to EDGX Options in Penny Pilot 
Securities \7\ and non-Penny Pilot Securities, respectively. Both fee 
code RC and fee code RD will yield no charge, as EDGX Options has not 
proposed to charge a fee for Customer orders.\8\ The Exchange also 
proposes to adopt fee codes RF and RG, which will apply to Non-Customer 
orders \9\ routed to EDGX Options in Penny Pilot Securities and non-
Penny Pilot Securities, respectively. The Exchange proposes to charge 
$0.56 for orders yielding fee code RF and $0.96 per contract for orders 
yielding fee code RG, which in each case represents the base fee for a 
Non-Customer order (other than market maker order) executed on EDGX 
Options plus an additional fee to cover Routing Costs.\10\ Although the 
Exchange does not propose to charge a fee for Customer orders routed to 
EDGX Options, the Exchange will incur Routing Costs in connection with 
such routing. The Exchange notes, however, that Customer orders 
executed on EDGX Options will receive rebates in certain circumstances 
that the Exchange does not propose to pass back to Members. 
Accordingly, the Exchange anticipates that the proposed fee structure 
will approximate the cost of routing Customer orders to EDGX Options. 
The Exchange also notes that the proposed fees for fee codes RF and RG 
are higher than the fees charged by EDGX Options for market maker 
orders sent directly to

[[Page 71893]]

EDGX Options.\11\ The Exchange does not anticipate that market makers 
will be significant users of Exchange routing services, as such 
participants typically maintain direct connectivity to other options 
exchanges. Also, as it has done historically in connection with the fee 
structure for routing to other options exchanges, the Exchange is 
proposing the charges set forth above, including the grouping of all 
Non-Customer orders, to maintain a simple fee schedule with respect to 
routing fees that approximates the total cost of routing, including 
Routing Costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ ``Customer'' applies to any transaction identified by a 
Member for clearing in the Customer range at the OCC, excluding any 
transaction for a Broker Dealer or a ``Professional'' as defined in 
Exchange Rule 16.1.
    \7\ ``Penny Pilot Securities'' are those issues quoted pursuant 
to Exchange Rule 21.5, Interpretation and Policy .01.
    \8\ See SR-EDGX-2015-54 filed October 30, 2015, available at: 
http://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/regulation/rule_filings/approved/2015/SR-EDGX-2015-54.pdf.
    \9\ The Exchange also proposes to adopt a definition of Non-
Customer order, which would apply to any transaction that is not a 
Customer order, as described below.
    \10\ See supra note 8.
    \11\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Customer Penny Pilot Add Tiers
    Currently, the Exchange offers a standard rebate of $0.25 per 
contract for Customer orders in Penny Pilot Securities that add 
liquidity to the Exchange, which apply to fee code PY. As set forth in 
footnote 1 of the fee schedule, the Exchange also offers tiered pricing 
pursuant to which Members can receive higher rebates up to $0.50 if 
they qualify pursuant to various criteria, including volume levels on 
BZX Options and, with respect to the Exchange's Cross-Asset Add Tiers, 
volume levels on BZX Options as well as volume on the Exchange's equity 
trading platform (``BZX Equities''). The Exchange proposes to add four 
new tiers to incentivize Members to add additional volume on the 
Exchange, particularly in Customer orders. The Exchange also proposes 
to delete one of the Cross-Asset Add Tiers, as set forth below.
    The Exchange's current Customer Add Volume Tiers 1 through 3 
require certain levels of ADV \12\ as a percentage of average TCV.\13\ 
The Exchange proposes to add Customer Add Volume Tiers 4 through 6, 
which will require certain levels of ADAV \14\ as a percentage of 
average TCV. Below is a summary of proposed tiers 4 through 6:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ ``ADV'' means average daily volume calculated as the number 
of contracts added or removed, combined, per day.
    \13\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the 
volume reported by all exchanges to the consolidated transaction 
reporting plan for the month for which the fees apply, excluding 
volume on any day that the Exchange experiences an Exchange System 
Disruption and on any day with a scheduled early market close.
    \14\ ``ADAV'' means average daily added volume calculated as the 
number of contracts per day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Customer Add Volume Tier 4 would provide a Customer order 
add rebate of $0.50 per contract for any Member that has an ADAV equal 
to or greater than 0.85% of average TCV.
     Customer Add Volume Tier 5 would provide a Customer order 
add rebate of $0.52 per contract for any Member that has an ADAV in 
Customer orders equal to or greater than 0.80% of average TCV and an 
ADAV in Market Maker \15\ orders equal to or greater than 0.40% of 
average TCV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ ``Market Maker'' applies to any transaction identified by a 
Member for clearing in the Market Maker range at the OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Customer Add Volume Tier 6 would provide a Customer order 
add rebate of $0.53 per contract for any Member that has an ADAV in 
Customer orders equal to or greater than 1.80% of average TCV.
    Similar to other pricing where the Exchange seeks to incentivize 
growth by providing tiered pricing based on a Member's participation 
increase over time, the Exchange also proposes to adopt a new Customer 
Step-Up Volume Tier. Pursuant to the Customer Step-Up Volume Tier a 
Member would receive a Customer order add rebate of $0.53 per contract 
to the extent the Member has an Options Step-Up Add TCV \16\ in 
Customer orders from September 2015 baseline equal to or greater than 
0.40%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ ``Options Step-Up Add TCV'' means ADAV as a percentage of 
TCV in the relevant baseline month subtracted from current ADAV as a 
percentage of TCV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to the proposed new tiers described above, the Exchange 
proposes to eliminate Customer Cross-Asset Add Tier 2, and in turn, to 
re-number current Customer Cross-Asset Add Tier 1 as Customer Cross-
Asset Add Tier.
Non-Customer Add Volume Tier Rebates for Increased Participation
    The Exchange currently offers enhanced rebates under the: (i) 
Firm,\17\ Broker Dealer,\18\ and Joint Back Office \19\ Penny Pilot Add 
Volume Tiers, which are set forth in footnote 2; (ii) the NBBO Setter 
Tiers, which are set forth in footnote 4; (iii) the Market Maker and 
Non-BATS Market Maker \20\ Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers, which are set 
forth in footnote 6; and (iv) the Firm, Broker Dealer, and Joint Back 
Office Non-Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers, which are set forth in 
footnote 8. These tiers are collectively referred to hereafter as the 
``Non-Customer Add Volume Tiers''. To incentivize the growth of BZX 
Options, particularly in Non-Customer orders, the Exchange proposes to 
adopt step-up pricing as follows. A Member with an Options Step-Up Add 
TCV in Non-Customer Orders from the Member's March 2015 baseline equal 
to or greater than 0.15% and an ADAV in Non-BATS Market Maker 
(``NBMM''), Firm, Broker Dealer (``BD'') and Joint Back Office 
(``JBO'') orders equal to or greater than 0.30% of average TCV would 
qualify for the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ ``Firm'' applies to any transaction identified by a Member 
for clearing in the Firm range at the Options Clearing Corporation 
(``OCC''), excluding any Joint Back office transaction.
    \18\ ``Broker Dealer'' applies to any order for the account of a 
broker dealer, including a foreign broker dealer, that clears in the 
Customer range at the OCC.
    \19\ ``Joint Back Office'' applies to any transaction identified 
by a Member for clearing in the Firm Range at the OCC that is 
identified with an origin code as Joint Back Office.
    \20\ ``Non-BATS Market Maker'' applies to any transaction 
identified by a Member for clearing in the Market Maker range at the 
OCC, where such Member is not registered with the Exchange as a 
Market Maker, but is registered as a market maker on another options 
exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Under footnote 2, a rebate of $0.43 per contract for Firm, 
BD, and JBO orders that add liquidity in Penny Pilot Securities, which 
yield fee code PF.
     Under footnote 6, a rebate of $0.43 per contract for 
Market Maker and NBMM orders that add liquidity in Penny Pilot 
Securities, which yield fee code PM.
     Under footnote 8, a rebate of $0.67 per contract for Firm, 
BD, and JBO orders that add liquidity in non-Penny Pilot Securities, 
which yield fee code NF.
    Also, the Exchange proposes to modify the criteria for NBBO Setter 
Tier 3 to align with the step-up criteria proposed above. Pursuant to 
NBBO Setter Tier 3, qualifying Members earn an additional rebate per 
contract of $0.04 on Non-Customer orders that add liquidity. Currently, 
to qualify for this tier a Member must: (i) Have an Options Step-Up Add 
TCV from September 2014 baseline equal to or greater than 0.30%; (ii) 
have an ADV equal to or greater than 0.40% of average TCV; and (iii) 
have an order that establishes a new NBBO. The Exchange proposes to 
modify the first and second criteria for this tier to align with the 
step-up criteria for the other Non-Customer Add Volume Tiers described 
above. Specifically, a Member must have: (i) An Options Step-up Add TCV 
in Non-Customer orders from March 2015 baseline equal to or greater 
than 0.15%; and (ii) an ADAV in NBMM, Firm, BD, and JBO orders equal to 
or greater than 0.30% of average TCV. The additional rebate per 
contract will still only apply to an order that establishes a new NBBO.
    In addition to the changes described above, the Exchange proposes 
to modify footnote 8 to explicitly state that the tiered rebates under 
such footnote are applicable to fee code NF. Although fee code NF in 
the Fee Codes and Associated Fees table properly refers to footnote 8, 
all other footnotes on the fee schedule also cross-reference back to 
applicable fee codes at the beginning of the footnote. The Exchange 
proposes to make this addition to footnote 8 to

[[Page 71894]]

ensure consistency with other footnotes and avoid potential confusion.
Non-Customer Penny Pilot Take Volume Tiers
    The Exchange currently offers a total of six Non-Customer Penny 
Pilot Take Volume Tiers that provide discounted fees for Non-Customer 
orders in Penny Pilot Securities that remove liquidity from BZX Options 
under fee code PP. The Exchange proposes various changes to these 
tiers, including reducing the total number to three tiers and modifying 
these remaining tiers, as set forth below.
     The Exchange proposes to delete Non-Customer Volume Tiers 
2 and 3 as well as the Non-Customer Step-Up Take Volume Tier.
     The Exchange currently charges $0.49 per contract for 
Members that qualify for Non-Customer Volume Tier 1, which requires 
that a Member has an ADV equal to or greater than 1.00% of average TCV. 
The Exchange proposes increasing the requirement necessary to qualify 
for Non-Customer Volume Tier 1 to require that a Member has an ADV 
equal to or greater than 1.50% of average TCV.
     The Exchange currently charges $0.45 per contract for 
Members that qualify for Non-Customer Volume Tier 4, which requires 
that a Member has an ADAV in Customer orders equal to or greater than 
0.80% of average TCV. The Exchange proposes to maintain this 
requirement but also to add a requirement that a Member has an ADAV in 
Market Maker orders equal to or greater than 0.40% of average TCV. The 
Exchange also proposes to increase the fee per contract for Members 
that qualify for this tier to $0.47 per contract. In connection with 
the deleted tiers noted above, the Exchange proposes to rename current 
Non-Customer Take Volume Tier 4 as Non-Customer Take Volume Tier 2.
     The Exchange currently charges $0.43 per contract for 
Members that qualify for Non-Customer Volume Tier 5, which requires 
that a Member has an ADAV in Customer orders equal to or greater than 
2.00% of average TCV. The Exchange proposes to decrease this 
requirement to require that a Member has an ADAV in Customer orders 
equal to or greater than 1.80% of average TCV. The Exchange also 
proposes to increase the fee per contract for Members that qualify for 
this tier to $0.46 per contract. In connection with the deleted tiers 
noted above, the Exchange proposes to rename current Non-Customer Take 
Volume Tier 5 as Non-Customer Take Volume Tier 3.
Other Changes
    The Exchange also proposes to amend the Standard Rates table, which 
summarizes the range of fees at the beginning of the fee schedule, in 
order to reflect the changes proposed above. The Exchange also proposes 
to adopt a definition of Non-Customer order, which would apply to any 
transaction that is not a Customer order. Though the Exchange believes 
that this has always been understood as the meaning is clear from the 
term itself, the Exchange believes that adding the explicit definition 
will promote consistency with other defined terms and avoid potential 
confusion. In addition, the Exchange proposes to consistently 
capitalize the term Non-Customer throughout the fee schedule.
Implementation Date
    The Exchange proposes to implement these amendments to its Fee 
Schedule effective immediately.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, 
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\21\ 
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\22\ in that it provides for 
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges 
among members and other persons using any facility or system which the 
Exchange operates or controls. The Exchange notes that it operates in a 
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily 
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels to be 
excessive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained above, the Exchange generally attempts to approximate 
the cost of routing to other options exchanges, including other 
applicable costs to the Exchange for routing. The Exchange believes 
that a pricing model based on approximate Routing Costs is a 
reasonable, fair and equitable approach to pricing. Specifically, the 
Exchange believes that its proposal to adopt routing fees to EDGX 
Options is fair, equitable and reasonable because the fees are 
generally an approximation of the anticipated cost to the Exchange for 
routing orders to EDGX Options. The Exchange notes that routing through 
the Exchange is voluntary. The Exchange also believes that the proposed 
fee structure for orders routed to and executed at EDGX Options is fair 
and equitable and not unreasonably discriminatory in that it applies 
equally to all Members.
    Volume-based rebates and fees such as the ones currently maintained 
on BZX Options have been widely adopted by equities and options 
exchanges and are equitable because they are open to all Members on an 
equal basis and provide additional benefits or discounts that are 
reasonably related to the value to an exchange's market quality 
associated with higher levels of market activity, such as higher levels 
of liquidity provision and/or growth patterns, and introduction of 
higher volumes of orders into the price and volume discovery processes.
    As explained above, the Exchange is proposing various modifications 
to the Exchange's tiered pricing structure that are intended to 
contribute to the continued growth of the Exchange. The proposed new 
Customer Penny Pilot Add Tiers are intended to incentivize Members to 
send additional volume, particularly Customer orders, to the Exchange. 
Similarly, the proposed new step-up tiers for the Non-Customer Add 
Volume Tiers, as well as the alignment of the criteria for NBBO Setter 
Tier 3 with such tiers, is intended to incentivize Members to send 
additional orders, particularly Non-Customer orders, to the Exchange. 
Finally, the elimination of Customer Cross-Asset Add Tier 2 and the 
proposed changes to the Non-Customer Penny Pilot Take Volume Tiers, 
including the proposed deletion of three tiers and the proposed 
increase to fees, are intended to allow the Exchange to continue to 
expand pricing incentives to promote the growth of the Exchange. The 
changes are also intended to incentivize additional volume by 
increasing qualifying criteria for the existing tiers, requiring more 
participation by Members to continue to receive reduced rates pursuant 
to such tiers.
    The Exchange believes that these changes are reasonable, fair and 
equitable and non-discriminatory, for the reasons set forth with 
respect to volume-based pricing generally and because such changes will 
either incentivize participants to further contribute to market quality 
on the Exchange or will allow the Exchange to earn additional revenue 
that can be used to offset the addition of new pricing incentives. The 
Exchange also believes that the proposed fees and rebates remain 
consistent with pricing previously offered by the Exchange as well as 
competitors of the Exchange and do not represent a significant 
departure

[[Page 71895]]

from the Exchange's general pricing structure.
    The Exchange believes that the additional clarifying changes and 
corrections proposed in this filing are reasonable, fair and equitable 
and non-discriminatory because each is intended to improve the 
understandability of the Exchange's fee schedule and to avoid 
confusion.

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe 
that any of the proposed changes to the Exchange's tiered pricing 
structure burden competition, but instead, that they enhance 
competition as they are intended to increase the competitiveness of BZX 
Options by offering new pricing incentives or modifying and eliminating 
pricing incentives in order to provide such incentives. Also, the 
Exchange believes that the increase to certain thresholds necessary to 
meet tiers offered by the Exchange contributes to rather than burdens 
competition, as such changes are intended to incentivize participants 
to increase their participation on the Exchange. Similarly, the 
introduction of new tiers is intended to provide incentives to Members 
to encourage them to enter orders to BZX Options, and thus is again 
intended to enhance competition.
    Similarly, the Exchange does not believe that its proposed pricing 
for routing to EDGX Options burdens competition, as such rates are 
intended to approximate the cost of routing to EDGX Options. As stated 
above, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels to be excessive or providers 
of routing services if they deem routing fee levels to be excessive.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the 
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, 
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received 
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \23\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 
thereunder.\24\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the 
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend 
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is 
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of 
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \24\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is 
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the 
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File No. SR-BATS-2015-98 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2015-98. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2015-98 and should be 
submitted on or before December 8, 2015.


    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-29231 Filed 11-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 221 / Tuesday, November 17, 2015 / Notices 71895

from the Exchange’s general pricing III. Date of Effectiveness of the inspection and copying at the principal
structure. Proposed Rule Change and Timing for office of the Exchange. All comments
The Exchange believes that the Commission Action received will be posted without change;
additional clarifying changes and The foregoing rule change has become the Commission does not edit personal
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) identifying information from
corrections proposed in this filing are
of the Act 23 and paragraph (f) of Rule submissions. You should submit only
reasonable, fair and equitable and non-
19b–4 thereunder.24 At any time within information that you wish to make
discriminatory because each is intended available publicly. All submissions
to improve the understandability of the 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may should refer to File Number SR–BATS–
Exchange’s fee schedule and to avoid 2015–98 and should be submitted on or
confusion. temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such before December 8, 2015.
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s action is necessary or appropriate in the For the Commission, by the Division of
Statement on Burden on Competition public interest, for the protection of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of authority.25
The Exchange does not believe that the purposes of the Act. Robert W. Errett,
the proposed rule change will impose
IV. Solicitation of Comments Deputy Secretary.
any burden on competition not
[FR Doc. 2015–29231 Filed 11–16–15; 8:45 am]
necessary or appropriate in furtherance Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange does not believe that any of arguments concerning the foregoing,
the proposed changes to the Exchange’s including whether the proposal is
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
tiered pricing structure burden consistent with the Act. Comments may
COMMISSION
competition, but instead, that they be submitted by any of the following
enhance competition as they are methods: [Release No. IC–31899; File No. 812–14256]
intended to increase the Electronic Comments THL Credit, Inc., et al.; Notice of
competitiveness of BZX Options by • Use the Commission’s Internet Application
offering new pricing incentives or comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
modifying and eliminating pricing November 10, 2015.
rules/sro.shtml); or
incentives in order to provide such • Send an email to rule-comments@ AGENCY: Securities and Exchange
incentives. Also, the Exchange believes sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
that the increase to certain thresholds BATS–2015–98 on the subject line. ACTION: Notice of application for an
necessary to meet tiers offered by the order under sections 17(d) and 57(i) of
Paper Comments the Investment Company Act of 1940
Exchange contributes to rather than
burdens competition, as such changes • Send paper comments in triplicate (the ‘‘Act’’) and rule 17d–1 under the
are intended to incentivize participants to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Act to permit certain joint transactions
to increase their participation on the Commission, 100 F Street, NE., otherwise prohibited by sections 17(d)
Washington, DC 20549–1090. and 57(a)(4) of the Act and rule 17d–1
Exchange. Similarly, the introduction of
All submissions should refer to File under the Act.
new tiers is intended to provide
incentives to Members to encourage Number SR–BATS–2015–98. This file
Summary of Application: Applicants
them to enter orders to BZX Options, number should be included on the
request an order to permit a business
subject line if email is used. To help the
and thus is again intended to enhance development company and certain other
Commission process and review your
competition. closed-end management investment
comments more efficiently, please use
Similarly, the Exchange does not only one method. The Commission will companies to co-invest in portfolio
believe that its proposed pricing for post all comments on the Commission’s companies with each other and with
routing to EDGX Options burdens Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ affiliated investment funds.
Applicants: THL Credit, Inc.
competition, as such rates are intended rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
(‘‘TCRD’’), THL Credit Holdings, Inc.
to approximate the cost of routing to submission, all subsequent
(‘‘TCRD Subsidiary’’), THL Credit Direct
EDGX Options. As stated above, the amendments, all written statements
Lending Fund III LLC (‘‘THL Credit
Exchange notes that it operates in a with respect to the proposed rule
Fund III’’), THL Credit Advisors LLC
highly competitive market in which change that are filed with the
(‘‘BDC Adviser’’) on behalf of itself and
market participants can readily direct Commission, and all written
communications relating to the its successors,1 and THL Credit Senior
order flow to competing venues if they Loan Strategies LLC (‘‘Subsidiary
deem fee levels to be excessive or proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than Adviser’’) on behalf of itself and its
providers of routing services if they successors.
deem routing fee levels to be excessive. those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the DATES: Filing Dates: The application was
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be filed on December 23, 2013, and
Statement on Comments on the available for Web site viewing and amended on February 10, 2015, May 20,
Proposed Rule Change Received From printing in the Commission’s Public 2015, September 11, 2015, and
November 6, 2015.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Members, Participants or Others Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
The Exchange has not solicited, and business days between the hours of order granting the requested relief will
does not intend to solicit, comments on 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such 25 17CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
this proposed rule change. The filing will also be available for 1 The term ‘‘successor,’’ as applied to an Adviser,
Exchange has not received any written
means an entity that results from a reorganization
comments from members or other 23 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). into another jurisdiction or change in the type of
interested parties. 24 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f). business organization.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Nov 16, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00126 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1
Document Created: 2015-12-14 14:00:16
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 14:00:16
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
FR Citation		80 FR 71892