80_FR_74941 80 FR 74712 - Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Blueline Tilefish Fishery; Secretarial Emergency Action

80 FR 74712 - Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Blueline Tilefish Fishery; Secretarial Emergency Action

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 229 (November 30, 2015)

Page Range74712-74714
FR Document2015-30320

This rule extends emergency permitting and possession limit regulations for the blueline tilefish fishery in waters north of the Virginia/North Carolina border that were implemented on June 4, 2015. This extension is necessary to continue to constrain fishing effort on the blueline tilefish stock while a long-term management plan is developed. The rule is expected to reduce fishing mortality and help ensure the long-term sustainability of the stock.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 229 (Monday, November 30, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 229 (Monday, November 30, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74712-74714]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 150311250-5474-01]
RIN 0648-BE97


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Blueline Tilefish 
Fishery; Secretarial Emergency Action

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Temporary rule; emergency action extended.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule extends emergency permitting and possession limit 
regulations for the blueline tilefish fishery in waters north of the 
Virginia/North Carolina border that were implemented on June 4, 2015. 
This extension is necessary to continue to constrain fishing effort on 
the blueline tilefish stock while a long-term management plan is 
developed. The rule is expected to reduce fishing mortality and help 
ensure the long-term sustainability of the stock.

DATES: The expiration date of the emergency rule published on June 4, 
2016 (80 FR 31864) is extended through June 3, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Copies the Environmental Assessment and Regulatory Impact 
Review (EA/RIR) and other supporting documents for this emergency 
action are available from John K. Bullard, Regional Administrator, 
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic 
Drive, Gloucester, MA, 01930. The EA/RIR is also accessible via the 
Internet at: http://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tobey Curtis, Fishery Policy Analyst, 
(978) 281-9273.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    This temporary final rule extends emergency permitting and 
possession limit regulations for the blueline tilefish (Caulolatilus 
microps) fishery in the Greater Atlantic Region (i.e., Federal waters 
north of the latitude of the Virginia/North Carolina border) as 
described in the original emergency action that published on June 4, 
2015 (80 FR 31864). The initial temporary rule was implemented in 
response to a request for emergency action from the Mid-Atlantic 
Fishery Management Council. That temporary final rule

[[Page 74713]]

included detailed information on the background, purpose, need, and 
justification to implement these emergency management measures, and 
that information is not repeated here.
    Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act allows for the extension 
of an emergency action, which is otherwise effective for up to 180 
days, for up to another 186 days, provided that certain criteria are 
met: (1) The public has had an opportunity to comment on the emergency 
regulation; and (2) in the case of a Council recommendation for 
emergency action, the Council is actively developing an fishery 
management plan (FMP) amendment or regulations to address the emergency 
on a permanent basis. NMFS accepted public comment on the initial 
emergency measures in the final rule through July 6, 2015; comments and 
responses are summarized below. The Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic 
Fishery Management Councils are both working on long-term management 
measures for blueline tilefish along the Atlantic coast. The Mid-
Atlantic Council has initiated an amendment to its Golden Tilefish FMP 
to add blueline tilefish fishery management measures to that FMP and 
manage the stock within its jurisdiction. Final action on that 
amendment is expected to occur at the Council's February 2016 meeting 
so that rulemaking may be completed before this temporary extension 
expires. This extension does not change the measures already in place. 
NMFS is not accepting additional public comment on this extension, and 
has determined that all the necessary criteria have been met and, 
therefore, is extending these emergency measures.

Extended Emergency Management Measures

    This temporary final rule extends the following management measures 
for blueline tilefish in the Greater Atlantic Region:
    1. A requirement for commercial or charter/party vessels landing 
blueline tilefish in the Northeast region (i.e., north of the latitude 
of the Virginia/North Carolina border: 36[deg]33'01.0'' N. latitude) to 
hold a valid Northeast open access golden tilefish commercial or 
charter/party vessel permit, which are issued by the Greater Atlantic 
Regional Fisheries Office;
    2. A commercial possession limit of 300 lb (136 kg) whole weight 
per trip; and
    3. A recreational possession limit of seven blueline tilefish per 
person, per trip.
    None of these management measures modify the existing possession 
regulations for golden tilefish, or any other species.
    In addition to the efforts being made by the Mid-Atlantic Council, 
the South Atlantic Council is considering revisions to its Snapper 
Grouper FMP to modify blueline tilefish management measures that may or 
may not affect the Mid-Atlantic Council's management of this stock. 
Questions remain on potential stock structure of the species throughout 
its distribution and there is considerable uncertainty in the data and 
projections in the most recent benchmark stock assessment that are 
currently being explored. It is expected that the long-term management 
of blueline tilefish fisheries will be improved once these scientific 
and policy issues are resolved. These extended emergency measures will 
continue to protect blueline tilefish in the Greater Atlantic Region 
while allowing the Councils more time to finalize their work.

Comments and Responses

    We received numerous public comments prior to implementation of the 
emergency action, primarily from fishermen who were opposed to overly-
restrictive possession limits on blueline tilefish. Overall, the 
concerns raised in these comments were addressed by the management 
measures that we implemented. We received three comments during the 
original rule's comment period, and these are summarized below.
    Comment 1: One comment was from a North Carolina-based commercial 
fishing organization. The commenter suggested that the blueline 
tilefish possession limits implemented by the rule disproportionately 
impacted commercial fishing vessels while not equally restraining 
recreational fishing vessels.
    Response: According to the analyses in the EA (see ADDRESSES), the 
possession limits implemented by NMFS were expected to have minor 
negative impacts on both commercial and recreational fishing vessels. 
In recent years, only 18 percent of commercial trips landed more than 
500 lb (227 kg) of blueline tilefish, and in 2014, 94 percent of 
landings were derived from only six vessels (out of 81 active vessels). 
Therefore, the commercial possession limit of 300 lb (136 kg) was not 
expected to impact the vast majority of vessels in the fishery, and by 
design, reduces incentives to target blueline tilefish. Similarly, in 
the recreational fishery in recent years, only 12 percent of charter/
party trips landed more than seven fish per person. Therefore, impacts 
on the overall commercial and recreational fisheries were projected to 
be comparable, with little impact on the vast majority of trips.
    Comment 2: One comment from a New Jersey recreational fisherman 
opposed the recreational possession limit, stating it was too 
restrictive.
    Response: As noted in the response above, a minority of 
recreational trips are likely to be affected by the possession limit of 
seven fish per person. The objective of the emergency rule was to 
prevent further expansion of catch on this species, and we believe the 
seven-fish possession limit to be appropriate, and consistent with the 
recommendations of the Council. Additionally, the blueline tilefish 
possession limits do not impact the possession limits of golden 
tilefish or other species.
    Comment 3: One comment was from a recreational fisherman who was 
opposed to a possession limit of one fish per vessel (Alternative 2 in 
the EA).
    Response: NMFS agrees that the possession limits under Alternative 
2 would have been more restrictive, and likely to result in greater 
negative impacts on a higher proportion of fishery participants. NMFS 
chose to implement the possession limit of seven fish per person to 
help constrain fishing effort, while still allowing the fishery to 
continue.

Classification

    The Regional Administrator, Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, has 
determined that the emergency measures extended by this temporary rule 
are necessary for the conservation and management of the blueline 
tilefish fishery and are consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and 
other applicable law.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries 
finds good cause to waive the 30-day delayed effectiveness of this 
action. Because the extension of these emergency measures contains 
regulations already in place, it is contrary to public interest to 
allow them to expire. As described more fully in the original emergency 
action (80 FR 31864; June 4, 2015), the reasons justifying promulgation 
of the rule on an emergency basis make a delay in effectiveness 
contrary to the public interest. The possession limits implemented for 
recreational and commercial blueline tilefish vessels fishing in 
Federal waters north of the Virgina/North Carolina border are needed to 
constrain fishing mortality on the stock that would otherwise be 
unregulated. To provide protection for blueline tilefish, and to allow 
additional

[[Page 74714]]

time for the Council to develop an appropriate long-term solution for 
the management of this stock, expediting these emergency measures is 
necessary.
    This action is being taken pursuant to the emergency provision of 
the Magnuson-Stevens Act and is exempt from OMB review.
    This rule is exempt from the otherwise applicable requirement of 
the Regulatory Flexibility Act to prepare a regulatory flexibility 
analysis because the rule is issued without opportunity for prior 
public comment.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: November 24, 2015.
Eileen Sobeck,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-30320 Filed 11-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P



                                                74712            Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                                Amendment 15 modifies stock status                      PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE                             DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                determination criteria to match the                     CARIBBEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND
                                                biomass-based output of the stock                       SOUTH ATLANTIC                                        National Oceanic and Atmospheric
                                                synthesis model. These revisions to the                                                                       Administration
                                                penaeid shrimp stock status criteria are                ■ 1. The authority citation for part 622
                                                expected to cause little to no change to                continues to read as follows:                         50 CFR Part 648
                                                the biological, physical, or ecological                                                                       [Docket No. 150311250–5474–01]
                                                environments because these changes are                      Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
                                                only to the stock status reference points                                                                     RIN 0648–BE97
                                                                                                        ■ 2. In § 622.60, revise paragraphs (a)
                                                and therefore will not have a direct                    and (b) to read as follows:
                                                impact on the actual harvest of penaeid                                                                       Fisheries of the Northeastern United
                                                shrimp.                                                 § 622.60 Adjustment of management                     States; Blueline Tilefish Fishery;
                                                                                                        measures.                                             Secretarial Emergency Action
                                                Comments and Responses
                                                                                                        *      *     *     *    *                             AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries
                                                  No substantive comments were                             (a) Gulf penaeid shrimp. For a species             Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
                                                received on either Amendment 15 or the                  or species group: Reporting and                       Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
                                                proposed rule. One comment was                                                                                Commerce.
                                                                                                        monitoring requirements, permitting
                                                received from a Federal agency that                     requirements, size limits, vessel trip                ACTION: Temporary rule; emergency
                                                stated that it had no comment on the                                                                          action extended.
                                                                                                        limits, closed seasons or areas and
                                                proposed rule or on Amendment 15.
                                                                                                        reopenings, quotas (including a quota of              SUMMARY:    This rule extends emergency
                                                Classification                                          zero), MSY (or proxy), OY, management                 permitting and possession limit
                                                                                                        parameters such as overfished and                     regulations for the blueline tilefish
                                                   The Regional Administrator,                          overfishing definitions, gear restrictions            fishery in waters north of the Virginia/
                                                Southeast Region, NMFS has
                                                                                                        (ranging from regulation to complete                  North Carolina border that were
                                                determined that this final rule is
                                                                                                        prohibition), gear markings and                       implemented on June 4, 2015. This
                                                consistent with Amendment 15, the
                                                                                                        identification, vessel markings and                   extension is necessary to continue to
                                                FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and
                                                                                                        identification, allowable biological                  constrain fishing effort on the blueline
                                                other applicable law. This final rule has
                                                                                                        catch (ABC) and ABC control rules,                    tilefish stock while a long-term
                                                been determined to be not significant for
                                                                                                        rebuilding plans, restrictions relative to            management plan is developed. The
                                                purposes of Executive Order 12866.
                                                                                                        conditions of harvested shrimp                        rule is expected to reduce fishing
                                                   The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides                    (maintaining shrimp in whole                          mortality and help ensure the long-term
                                                the statutory basis for this rule. No                                                                         sustainability of the stock.
                                                                                                        condition, use as bait), target effort and
                                                duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting                                                                      DATES: The expiration date of the
                                                                                                        fishing mortality reduction levels,
                                                Federal rules have been identified. In                                                                        emergency rule published on June 4,
                                                addition, no new reporting, record-                     bycatch reduction criteria, BRD
                                                                                                        certification and decertification criteria,           2016 (80 FR 31864) is extended through
                                                keeping, or other compliance                                                                                  June 3, 2016.
                                                requirements are introduced by this                     BRD testing protocol and certified BRD
                                                                                                        specifications.                                       ADDRESSES: Copies the Environmental
                                                final rule.                                                                                                   Assessment and Regulatory Impact
                                                   The Chief Counsel for Regulation of                     (b) Gulf royal red shrimp. Reporting               Review (EA/RIR) and other supporting
                                                the Department of Commerce certified                    and monitoring requirements,                          documents for this emergency action are
                                                to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the                permitting requirements, size limits,                 available from John K. Bullard, Regional
                                                Small Business Administration during                    vessel trip limits, closed seasons or                 Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic
                                                the proposed rule stage that this rule                  areas and reopenings, annual catch                    Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
                                                would not have a significant economic                   limits (ACLs), annual catch targets                   Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA, 01930.
                                                impact on a substantial number of small                 (ACTs), quotas (including a quota of                  The EA/RIR is also accessible via the
                                                entities. The factual basis for this                    zero), accountability measures (AMs),                 Internet at: http://
                                                determination was published in the                      MSY (or proxy), OY, management                        www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/.
                                                proposed rule and is not repeated here.                 parameters such as overfished and                     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                No comments were received regarding                     overfishing definitions, gear restrictions            Tobey Curtis, Fishery Policy Analyst,
                                                the certification and NMFS has not                      (ranging from regulation to complete                  (978) 281–9273.
                                                received any new information that                       prohibition), gear markings and                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                would affect its determination. As a                    identification, vessel markings and
                                                result, a final regulatory flexibility                  identification, ABC and ABC control                   Background
                                                analysis is not required and none was                   rules, rebuilding plans, and restrictions               This temporary final rule extends
                                                prepared.                                               relative to conditions of harvested                   emergency permitting and possession
                                                List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622                     shrimp (maintaining shrimp in whole                   limit regulations for the blueline tilefish
                                                                                                        condition, use as bait).                              (Caulolatilus microps) fishery in the
                                                  Fisheries, Fishing, Gulf of Mexico,                   [FR Doc. 2015–30214 Filed 11–27–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                              Greater Atlantic Region (i.e., Federal
                                                Shrimp.                                                                                                       waters north of the latitude of the
                                                                                                        BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
                                                  Dated: November 23, 2015.                                                                                   Virginia/North Carolina border) as
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                Eileen Sobeck,
                                                                                                                                                              described in the original emergency
                                                                                                                                                              action that published on June 4, 2015
                                                Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
                                                National Marine Fisheries Service.
                                                                                                                                                              (80 FR 31864). The initial temporary
                                                                                                                                                              rule was implemented in response to a
                                                  For the reasons set out in the                                                                              request for emergency action from the
                                                preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended                                                                          Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
                                                as follows:                                                                                                   Council. That temporary final rule


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:17 Nov 27, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00040   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM   30NOR1


                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations                                         74713

                                                included detailed information on the                    regulations for golden tilefish, or any               commercial and recreational fisheries
                                                background, purpose, need, and                          other species.                                        were projected to be comparable, with
                                                justification to implement these                           In addition to the efforts being made              little impact on the vast majority of
                                                emergency management measures, and                      by the Mid-Atlantic Council, the South                trips.
                                                that information is not repeated here.                  Atlantic Council is considering                          Comment 2: One comment from a
                                                   Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-                      revisions to its Snapper Grouper FMP to               New Jersey recreational fisherman
                                                Stevens Act allows for the extension of                 modify blueline tilefish management                   opposed the recreational possession
                                                an emergency action, which is                           measures that may or may not affect the               limit, stating it was too restrictive.
                                                otherwise effective for up to 180 days,                 Mid-Atlantic Council’s management of                     Response: As noted in the response
                                                for up to another 186 days, provided                    this stock. Questions remain on                       above, a minority of recreational trips
                                                that certain criteria are met: (1) The                  potential stock structure of the species              are likely to be affected by the
                                                public has had an opportunity to                        throughout its distribution and there is              possession limit of seven fish per
                                                comment on the emergency regulation;                    considerable uncertainty in the data and              person. The objective of the emergency
                                                and (2) in the case of a Council                        projections in the most recent                        rule was to prevent further expansion of
                                                recommendation for emergency action,                    benchmark stock assessment that are                   catch on this species, and we believe the
                                                the Council is actively developing an                   currently being explored. It is expected              seven-fish possession limit to be
                                                fishery management plan (FMP)                           that the long-term management of                      appropriate, and consistent with the
                                                amendment or regulations to address                     blueline tilefish fisheries will be                   recommendations of the Council.
                                                the emergency on a permanent basis.                     improved once these scientific and                    Additionally, the blueline tilefish
                                                NMFS accepted public comment on the                     policy issues are resolved. These                     possession limits do not impact the
                                                initial emergency measures in the final                 extended emergency measures will                      possession limits of golden tilefish or
                                                rule through July 6, 2015; comments                     continue to protect blueline tilefish in              other species.
                                                and responses are summarized below.                     the Greater Atlantic Region while                        Comment 3: One comment was from
                                                The Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic                     allowing the Councils more time to                    a recreational fisherman who was
                                                Fishery Management Councils are both                    finalize their work.                                  opposed to a possession limit of one fish
                                                working on long-term management                                                                               per vessel (Alternative 2 in the EA).
                                                                                                        Comments and Responses                                   Response: NMFS agrees that the
                                                measures for blueline tilefish along the
                                                Atlantic coast. The Mid-Atlantic                           We received numerous public                        possession limits under Alternative 2
                                                Council has initiated an amendment to                   comments prior to implementation of                   would have been more restrictive, and
                                                its Golden Tilefish FMP to add blueline                 the emergency action, primarily from                  likely to result in greater negative
                                                tilefish fishery management measures to                 fishermen who were opposed to overly-                 impacts on a higher proportion of
                                                that FMP and manage the stock within                    restrictive possession limits on blueline             fishery participants. NMFS chose to
                                                its jurisdiction. Final action on that                  tilefish. Overall, the concerns raised in             implement the possession limit of seven
                                                amendment is expected to occur at the                   these comments were addressed by the                  fish per person to help constrain fishing
                                                Council’s February 2016 meeting so that                 management measures that we                           effort, while still allowing the fishery to
                                                rulemaking may be completed before                      implemented. We received three                        continue.
                                                this temporary extension expires. This                  comments during the original rule’s
                                                                                                        comment period, and these are                         Classification
                                                extension does not change the measures
                                                already in place. NMFS is not accepting                 summarized below.                                        The Regional Administrator, Greater
                                                additional public comment on this                          Comment 1: One comment was from                    Atlantic Region, NMFS, has determined
                                                extension, and has determined that all                  a North Carolina-based commercial                     that the emergency measures extended
                                                the necessary criteria have been met                    fishing organization. The commenter                   by this temporary rule are necessary for
                                                and, therefore, is extending these                      suggested that the blueline tilefish                  the conservation and management of the
                                                emergency measures.                                     possession limits implemented by the                  blueline tilefish fishery and are
                                                                                                        rule disproportionately impacted                      consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
                                                Extended Emergency Management                           commercial fishing vessels while not                  Act and other applicable law.
                                                Measures                                                equally restraining recreational fishing                 Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), the
                                                   This temporary final rule extends the                vessels.                                              Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
                                                following management measures for                          Response: According to the analyses                finds good cause to waive the 30-day
                                                blueline tilefish in the Greater Atlantic               in the EA (see ADDRESSES), the                        delayed effectiveness of this action.
                                                Region:                                                 possession limits implemented by                      Because the extension of these
                                                   1. A requirement for commercial or                   NMFS were expected to have minor                      emergency measures contains
                                                charter/party vessels landing blueline                  negative impacts on both commercial                   regulations already in place, it is
                                                tilefish in the Northeast region (i.e.,                 and recreational fishing vessels. In                  contrary to public interest to allow them
                                                north of the latitude of the Virginia/                  recent years, only 18 percent of                      to expire. As described more fully in the
                                                North Carolina border: 36°33′01.0″ N.                   commercial trips landed more than 500                 original emergency action (80 FR 31864;
                                                latitude) to hold a valid Northeast open                lb (227 kg) of blueline tilefish, and in              June 4, 2015), the reasons justifying
                                                access golden tilefish commercial or                    2014, 94 percent of landings were                     promulgation of the rule on an
                                                charter/party vessel permit, which are                  derived from only six vessels (out of 81              emergency basis make a delay in
                                                issued by the Greater Atlantic Regional                 active vessels). Therefore, the                       effectiveness contrary to the public
                                                Fisheries Office;                                       commercial possession limit of 300 lb                 interest. The possession limits
                                                   2. A commercial possession limit of                  (136 kg) was not expected to impact the               implemented for recreational and
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                300 lb (136 kg) whole weight per trip;                  vast majority of vessels in the fishery,              commercial blueline tilefish vessels
                                                and                                                     and by design, reduces incentives to                  fishing in Federal waters north of the
                                                   3. A recreational possession limit of                target blueline tilefish. Similarly, in the           Virgina/North Carolina border are
                                                seven blueline tilefish per person, per                 recreational fishery in recent years, only            needed to constrain fishing mortality on
                                                trip.                                                   12 percent of charter/party trips landed              the stock that would otherwise be
                                                   None of these management measures                    more than seven fish per person.                      unregulated. To provide protection for
                                                modify the existing possession                          Therefore, impacts on the overall                     blueline tilefish, and to allow additional


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:17 Nov 27, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00041   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM   30NOR1


                                                74714            Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                                time for the Council to develop an                        This rule is exempt from the                          Dated: November 24, 2015.
                                                appropriate long-term solution for the                  otherwise applicable requirement of the               Eileen Sobeck,
                                                management of this stock, expediting                    Regulatory Flexibility Act to prepare a               Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
                                                these emergency measures is necessary.                  regulatory flexibility analysis because               National Marine Fisheries Service.
                                                   This action is being taken pursuant to               the rule is issued without opportunity                [FR Doc. 2015–30320 Filed 11–27–15; 8:45 am]
                                                the emergency provision of the                          for prior public comment.                             BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
                                                Magnuson-Stevens Act and is exempt
                                                from OMB review.                                          Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:17 Nov 27, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00042   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM   30NOR1



Document Created: 2018-03-01 11:12:53
Document Modified: 2018-03-01 11:12:53
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionTemporary rule; emergency action extended.
DatesThe expiration date of the emergency rule published on June 4, 2016 (80 FR 31864) is extended through June 3, 2016.
ContactTobey Curtis, Fishery Policy Analyst, (978) 281-9273.
FR Citation80 FR 74712 
RIN Number0648-BE97

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR