80 FR 75058 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 230 (December 1, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 230 (December 1, 2015)
| Page Range | 75058-75060 | |
| FR Document | 2015-30499 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 230 (Tuesday, December 1, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 75058-75060] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-30499] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department finds that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90- day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after December 2015, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. Opportunity to Request a Review: Not later than the last day of December 2015,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in December for the following periods: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. [[Page 75059]] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period of review ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping Duty Proceedings ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BRAZIL: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe 12/1/14-11/30/15 Fittings A-351-602. CHILE: Certain Preserved Mushrooms A-337- 12/1/14-11/30/15 804. GERMANY: Non-Oriented Electric Steel A-428- 5/22/14-11/30/15 843. INDIA: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 A-533-838. 12/1/14-11/30/15 Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 12/1/14-11/30/15 Products A-533-820. Commodity Matchbooks A-533-848........ 12/1/14-11/30/15 Stainless Steel Wire Rod A-533-808.... 12/1/14-11/30/15 INDONESIA: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel 12/1/14-11/30/15 Flat Products A-560-812. JAPAN: Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A-588- 5/22/14-11/30/15 872. Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 12/1/14-11/30/15 A-588-068. Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe A-588- 12/1/14-11/30/15 857. REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A-580- 5/22/14-11/30/15 872. Welded Astm A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe 12/1/14-11/30/15 A-580-810. RUSSIA: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel 12/19/14-11/30/15 Flat Products A-821-809. SOCIALIST OF REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: 12/1/14-11/30/15 Uncovered Innerspring Units A-552-803. SOUTH AFRICA: Uncovered Innerspring Units 12/1/14-11/30/15 A-791-821. SWEDEN: Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A- 5/22/14-11/30/15 401-809. TAIWAN: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A- 12/1/14-11/30/15 583-605. Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A-583- 5/22/14-11/30/15 851. Steel Wire Garment Hangers A-583-849.. 12/1/14-11/30/15 Welded Astm A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe 12/1/14-11/30/15 A-583-815. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 A-570-892. 12/1/14-11/30/15 Cased Pencils A-570-827............... 12/1/14-11/30/15 Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 12/1/14-11/30/15 Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules A-570-979. Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof 12/1/14-11/30/15 A-570-891. Honey A-570-863....................... 12/1/14-11/30/15 Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings A- 12/1/14-11/30/15 570-881. Multilayered Wood Flooring A-570-970.. 12/1/14-11/30/15 Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A-570- 2/21/14-11/30/15 996. Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware A-570- 12/1/14-11/30/15 506. Silicomanganese A-570-828............. 12/1/14-11/30/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Countervailing Duty Proceedings ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INDIA: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 C-533-839. 1/1/14-12/31/14 Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 1/1/14-12/31/14 Products C-533-821. Commodity Matchbooks C-533-849........ 1/1/14-12/31/14 INDONESIA: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel 1/1/14-12/31/14 Products C-560-813. TAIWAN: Non-Oriented Electrical Steel C- 3/25/14-12/31/14 583-852. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 1/1/14-12/31/14 Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules C-570-980. Multilayered Wood Flooring C-570-971.. 1/1/14-12/31/14 Non-Oriented Electrical Steel C-570- 3/25/14-12/31/14 997. THAILAND: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel 1/1/14-12/31/14 Flat Products C-549-818. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Suspension Agreements ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MEXICO: Sugar A-201-845....................... 12/19/14-11/30/15 Sugar C-201-846....................... 12/19/14-12/31/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative [[Page 75060]] review of that party absent new information as to the party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, as explained in Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), the Department clarified its practice with regard to the conditional review of the non-market economy (NME) entity in administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. The Department will no longer consider the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\3\ In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'') on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS Web site at http://access.trade.gov.\4\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received by the last day of December 2015. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of December 2015, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: November 13, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2015-30499 Filed 11-30-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![75058 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices
This notice constitutes the examination for administrative reviews which they were collapsed. Further, if
antidumping duty orders with respect to initiated pursuant to requests made for companies are requested to complete
welded line pipe from Korea and the orders identified below, the the Quantity and Value Questionnaire
Turkey pursuant to section 736(a) of the Department intends to select for purposes of respondent selection, in
Act. Interested parties can find a list of respondents based on U.S. Customs and general each company must report
antidumping duty orders currently in Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. volume and value data separately for
effect at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ imports during the period of review. We itself. Parties should not include data
stats/iastats1.html. intend to release the CBP data under for any other party, even if they believe
These orders are published in Administrative Protective Order they should be treated as a single entity
accordance with section 736(a) of the (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO with that other party. If a company was
Act and 19 CFR 351.211. within five days of publication of the
collapsed with another company or
Dated: November 23, 2015. initiation notice and to make our
decision regarding respondent selection companies in the most recently
Paul Piquado, completed segment of this proceeding
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
within 21 days of publication of the
initiation Federal Register notice. where the Department considered
Compliance.
Therefore, we encourage all parties collapsing that entity, complete quantity
[FR Doc. 2015–30506 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am] and value data for that collapsed entity
interested in commenting on respondent
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
selection to submit their APO must be submitted.
applications on the date of publication Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE of the initiation notice, or as soon
Administrative Review
thereafter as possible. The Department
International Trade Administration invites comments regarding the CBP Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
data and respondent selection within party that requests a review may
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty five days of placement of the CBP data withdraw that request within 90 days of
Order, Finding, or Suspended on the record of the review. the date of publication of the notice of
Investigation; Opportunity To Request In the event the Department decides
initiation of the requested review. The
Administrative Review it is necessary to limit individual
regulation provides that the Department
examination of respondents and
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, may extend this time if it is reasonable
conduct respondent selection under
International Trade Administration, to do so. In order to provide parties
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
Department of Commerce. In general, the Department finds that additional certainty with respect to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: determinations concerning whether when the Department will exercise its
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD particular companies should be discretion to extend this 90-day
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single deadline, interested parties are advised
Enforcement and Compliance, entity for purposes of calculating that, with regard to reviews requested
International Trade Administration, antidumping duty rates) require a on the basis of anniversary months on
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th substantial amount of detailed or after December 2015, the Department
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., information and analysis, which often does not intend to extend the 90-day
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) require follow-up questions and deadline unless the requestor
482–4735. analysis. Accordingly, the Department demonstrates that an extraordinary
Background will not conduct collapsing analyses at circumstance prevented it from
Each year during the anniversary the respondent selection phase of this submitting a timely withdrawal request.
month of the publication of an review and will not collapse companies Determinations by the Department to
antidumping or countervailing duty at the respondent selection phase unless extend the 90-day deadline will be
order, finding, or suspended there has been a determination to made on a case-by-case basis.
investigation, an interested party, as collapse certain companies in a
previous segment of this antidumping The Department is providing this
defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff notice on its Web site, as well as in its
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), proceeding (i.e., investigation,
administrative review, new shipper ‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
may request, in accordance with 19 CFR Review’’ notices, so that interested
351.213, that the Department of review or changed circumstances
review). For any company subject to this parties will be aware of the manner in
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
review, if the Department determined, which the Department intends to
an administrative review of that
or continued to treat, that company as exercise its discretion in the future.
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended collapsed with others, the Department Opportunity to Request a Review: Not
investigation. will assume that such companies later than the last day of December
All deadlines for the submission of continue to operate in the same manner 2015,1 interested parties may request
comments or actions by the Department and will collapse them for respondent administrative review of the following
discussed below refer to the number of selection purposes. Otherwise, the orders, findings, or suspended
calendar days from the applicable Department will not collapse companies investigations, with anniversary dates in
starting date. for purposes of respondent selection. December for the following periods:
Parties are requested to (a) identify
Respondent Selection which companies subject to review 1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In the event the Department limits the previously were collapsed, and (b) on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day
number of respondents for individual provide a citation to the proceeding in when the Department is closed.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:35 Nov 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM 01DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_75288/page/1.svg)
![75060 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices
review of that party absent new was conducted, the NME entity’s entries Dated: November 13, 2015.
information as to the party’s location. were not subject to the review and the Christian Marsh,
Moreover, if the interested party who rate for the NME entity is not subject to Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
files a request for review is unable to change as a result of that review and Countervailing Duty Operations.
locate the producer or exporter for (although the rate for the individual [FR Doc. 2015–30499 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am]
which it requested the review, the exporter may change as a function of the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
interested party must provide an finding that the exporter is part of the
explanation of the attempts it made to NME entity).
locate the producer or exporter at the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Following initiation of an
same time it files its request for review,
antidumping administrative review International Trade Administration
in order for the Secretary to determine
when there is no review requested of the
if the interested party’s attempts were [A–570–967]
NME entity, the Department will
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all
351.303(f)(3)(ii). Aluminum Extrusions From the
As explained in Antidumping and exporters not named in the initiation
notice, including those that were People’s Republic of China: Final
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Results of Antidumping Duty
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 suspended at the NME entity rate.
Administrative Review; 2013–2014
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- All requests must be filed
Market Economy Antidumping electronically in Enforcement and AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Proceedings: Assessment of Compliance’s Antidumping and International Trade Administration,
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 Countervailing Duty Centralized Department of Commerce.
(October 24, 2011) the Department Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’) SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
clarified its practice with respect to the on Enforcement and Compliance’s (the Department) is conducting an
collection of final antidumping duties ACCESS Web site at http:// administrative review of the
on imports of merchandise where access.trade.gov.4 Further, in antidumping duty order on aluminum
intermediate firms are involved. The accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), extrusions from the People’s Republic of
public should be aware of this a copy of each request must be served China (PRC).1 The period of review
clarification in determining whether to on the petitioner and each exporter or (POR) is May 1, 2013, through April 30,
request an administrative review of producer specified in the request. 2014. These final results cover 39
merchandise subject to antidumping The Department will publish in the companies for which an administrative
findings and orders.2 Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation review was initiated and not rescinded.2
Further, as explained in Antidumping The Department selected the following
of Administrative Review of
Proceedings: Announcement of Change companies as mandatory respondents:
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
in Department Practice for Respondent Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Selection in Antidumping Duty Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho
Investigation’’ for requests received by
Proceedings and Conditional Review of Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.
the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME the last day of December 2015. If the
Department does not receive, by the last (collectively, Jangho), Union Industry
Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR (Asia) Co., Ltd. (Union), and Guang Ya
65963 (November 4, 2013), the day of December 2015, a request for
review of entries covered by an order, Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd., Foshan
Department clarified its practice with Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd., Kong
regard to the conditional review of the finding, or suspended investigation
listed in this notice and for the period Ah International Company Limited, and
non-market economy (NME) entity in Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong
administrative reviews of antidumping identified above, the Department will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping or Kong) Ltd. (collectively, Guang Ya
duty orders. The Department will no
countervailing duties on those entries at Group); Guangdong Zhongya
longer consider the NME entity as an
a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or Aluminium Company Limited, Zhongya
exporter conditionally subject to
bond for) estimated antidumping or Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding
administrative reviews. Accordingly,
countervailing duties required on those Limited, and Karlton Aluminum
the NME entity will not be under review
entries at the time of entry, or Company Ltd. (collectively, Zhongya);
unless the Department specifically
withdrawal from warehouse, for and Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel
receives a request for, or self-initiates, a
consumption and to continue to collect Product Co., Ltd. (Xinya) (collectively,
review of the NME entity.3 In
the cash deposit previously ordered. Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya).3
administrative reviews of antidumping
duty orders on merchandise from NME For the first administrative review of 1 The Department initiated this review on June
countries where a review of the NME any order, there will be no assessment 27, 2014. See Initiation of Antidumping and
entity has not been initiated, but where of antidumping or countervailing duties Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
an individual exporter for which a on entries of subject merchandise 36462 (June 27, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
2 This administrative review initially covered 155
review was initiated does not qualify for entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
companies. See Initiation Notice. However, on
a separate rate, the Department will for consumption during the relevant January 29, 2015, the Department rescinded this
issue a final decision indicating that the provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of review with respect to 116 companies. See
company in question is part of the NME the order, if such a gap period is Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic
entity. However, in that situation, applicable to the period of review. of China: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 80 FR 4868 (January 29,
because no review of the NME entity This notice is not required by statute 2015).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2 See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web
but is published as a service to the 3 In prior segments of this proceeding the
international trading community. Department found that the Guang Ya Group,
site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. Zhongya, and Xinya were affiliated and should be
3 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties treated as a single entity. See, e.g., Aluminum
should specify that they are requesting a review of 4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China:
entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
the extent possible, include the names of such Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR Review and Rescission, in Part, 2010/12, 79 FR 96
exporters in their request. 39263 (July 6, 2011). (January 2, 2014) and Aluminum Extrusions From
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:35 Nov 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM 01DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_75288/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-02 09:10:01
Document Modified: 2018-03-02 09:10:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 75058 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR