80 FR 75060 - Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 230 (December 1, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 230 (December 1, 2015)
| Page Range | 75060-75064 | |
| FR Document | 2015-30502 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 230 (Tuesday, December 1, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 75060-75064] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-30502] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-967] Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014. These final results cover 39 companies for which an administrative review was initiated and not rescinded.\2\ The Department selected the following companies as mandatory respondents: Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd. (collectively, Jangho), Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd. (Union), and Guang Ya Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd., Foshan Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd., Kong Ah International Company Limited, and Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd. (collectively, Guang Ya Group); Guangdong Zhongya Aluminium Company Limited, Zhongya Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited, and Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd. (collectively, Zhongya); and Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd. (Xinya) (collectively, Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya).\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The Department initiated this review on June 27, 2014. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 36462 (June 27, 2014) (Initiation Notice). \2\ This administrative review initially covered 155 companies. See Initiation Notice. However, on January 29, 2015, the Department rescinded this review with respect to 116 companies. See Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 80 FR 4868 (January 29, 2015). \3\ In prior segments of this proceeding the Department found that the Guang Ya Group, Zhongya, and Xinya were affiliated and should be treated as a single entity. See, e.g., Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part, 2010/12, 79 FR 96 (January 2, 2014) and Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 78784 (December 31, 2014) (2012-2013 Final Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 75061]] The Department finds for these final results that Union made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. In addition, the Department determines that Jangho, Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya, and 15 other companies subject to this review did not demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate, and, accordingly, are to be considered part of the PRC-wide entity. We also determine for these final results that one --------------------------------------------------------------------------- company, Xin Wei Aluminum Company Limited (Xin Wei), had no shipments. DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Scott, Mark Flessner, or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2657, (202) 482-6312 or (202) 482-0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 8, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.\4\ At that time, we invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On June 10, 2015, we received comments from the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee (Petitioner) on the calculation of the margin for Union.\5\ On July 8, 2015, we received case briefs from Petitioner \6\ and Zhongya.\7\ On July 15, 2015, we received rebuttal briefs from Jangho \8\ and Petitioner.\9\ On September 25, 2015, the Department extended the deadline for the final results until November 5, 2015.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013- 2014, 80 FR 32347 (June 8, 2015) (Preliminary Results) and the accompanying memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China; 2013-2014,'' dated June 1, 2015 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). \5\ See letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of Commerce entitled, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Comments on Union's Preliminary Margin Calculations,'' dated June 10, 2015. \6\ See letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of Commerce entitled, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Case Brief of the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee,'' dated July 8, 2015. \7\ See letter from Zhongya to the Secretary of Commerce entitled, ``Aluminum Extrusions from China: Zhongda {sic{time} Case Brief,'' dated July 8, 2015. \8\ See letter from Jangho to the Secretary of Commerce entitled, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Rebuttal Brief: Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.,'' dated July 15, 2015. \9\ See letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of Commerce entitled, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Rebuttal Brief of the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee,'' dated July 15, 2015. \10\ See memorandum from Mark Flessner to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated September 25, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order \11\ is aluminum extrusions which are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other certifying body equivalents).\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011) (Order). \12\ For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 7609.00.00, 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.1 0, 8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00, 8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45, 8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 8473.30.20.00, 8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00, 8515.90.20.00, 8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00, 8529.90.73.00, 8529.90.97.60, 8536.90.80.85, 8538.10.00.00, 8543.90.88.80, 8708.29.50.60, 8708.80.65.90, 8803.30.00.60, 9013.90.50.00, 9013.90.90.00, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61, 9506.11.40.80, 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50. The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products may be classifiable under the following additional chapter 76 subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99 as well as under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be classifiable under HTSUS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is incorporated herein by reference. A list of the issues which parties raised, and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to [[Page 75062]] registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on an analysis of the comments received from interested parties and a review of the record, the Department corrected calculation errors for the final adjusted margin to be applied to Union. For a full explanation, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2. This recalculation of Union's rate affected the rate for other companies; see the section below entitled, ``Rate for Non- Examined Companies Which Are Eligible for a Separate Rate.'' The Department also reconsidered the necessity of having applied adverse facts available in the Preliminary Results with respect to Jangho and Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya in light of the Department's recent change of practice concerning the conditional review of the PRC-wide entity.\13\ For additional explanation, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum at ``Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference'' and Comments 4 and 5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013) (Conditional Review of NME Entity Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Companies Eligible for a Separate Rate In our Preliminary Results, we determined that 11 companies, plus Union, are eligible for a separate rate.\14\ These companies are: Allied Maker Limited; Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd.; Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Justhere Co., Ltd.; Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd; Kromet International Inc. (Kromet); Metaltek Group Co., Ltd.; Permasteelisa South China Factory; Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd.; Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; and tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. We received no information since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for reconsideration of this determination. Therefore, the Department continues to find that these 12 companies are eligible for a separate rate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 32348. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rate for Non-Examined Companies Which Are Eligible for a Separate Rate Neither the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), nor the Department's regulations address the establishment of the rate applied to individual separate rate companies not selected for examination where the Department limited its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The Department's practice in administrative reviews involving limited selection based on exporters accounting for the largest volumes of trade has been to look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market-economy antidumping investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs the Department to avoid calculating an all-others rate using any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available in investigations. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that, where all rates are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, the Department may use ``any reasonable method'' for assigning an all- others rate. In the Preliminary Results, we assigned the rate of 32.79 percent, the most recent rate (from the less than fair value investigation) calculated for the non-examined separate rate respondents, to the non- examined separate rate respondents in the instant review.\15\ However, we have determined in these Final Results that the methodology used in the Preliminary Results was predicated on the erroneous calculation of a rate of zero for Union. As Union's rate at these Final Results is neither zero nor de minimis, we are applying Union's calculated rate to the non-examined, separate rate companies in accordance with section 735(c)(5) of the Act. For a full explanation, see the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ Id., at 32349. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Determination of No Shipments One company remaining under review, Xin Wei, timely submitted a certification indicating that it had no sales, shipments, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\16\ Consistent with our practice, the Department requested that CBP conduct a query on potential shipments made by Xin Wei during the POR; CBP provided no evidence that contradicted Xin Wei's claim of no shipments. Based on Xin Wei's no- shipment certification and our analysis of the CBP information, in the Preliminary Results we determined that Xin Wei had no shipments during the POR.\17\ No party commented on that determination. The Department will issue appropriate instructions to CBP.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See letter from Xin Wei to the Secretary of Commerce entitled, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Certification of No Sales, Shipments, or Entries,'' dated August 26, 2014. \17\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 32349. \18\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRC-Wide Entity In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that the mandatory respondents Jangho and Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya were not eligible for a separate rate, and, accordingly, were part of the PRC- wide entity.\19\ For purposes of these Final Results, the Department continues to find that Jangho and Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya are not eligible for a separate rate and are part of the PRC-wide entity. For a full explanation, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 4 and 5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 32350. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, 14 companies still subject to these final results are not eligible for separate-rate status because they did not submit separate-rate applications or certifications; those companies are: Aluminicaste Fundicion de Mexico; China Zhongwang Holdings, Ltd.; Classic & Contemporary Inc.; Dongguan Golden Tiger; Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; Gold Mountain International Development, Ltd.; Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc.; Metaltek Metal Industry Co., Ltd.; Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd.; Press Metal International Ltd.; tenKsolar, Inc.; Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd.; WTI Building Products, Ltd.; and Zahoqing China Square Industry Limited/Zhaoqing China Square Industry Limited.\20\ Further, one company still under review, Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co., Ltd., submitted a separate-rate application that did not demonstrate eligibility for a separate [[Page 75063]] rate. As a result, the Department finds for these final results that these 15 companies are also part of the PRC-wide entity. The Department's change in policy regarding conditional review of the PRC- wide entity applies to this administrative review.\21\ Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate from the previous administrative review (i.e., 33.28 percent) is not subject to change.\22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ One company, Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd. (New Zhongya), was determined to have been succeeded by Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited (Guangdong Zhongya) in a changed circumstances review. See Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 77 FR 54900 (September 6, 2012). Thus, despite the fact that a review was initiated of New Zhongya, it is not being included among these 14 companies because its successor in interest, Guangdong Zhongya, is part of the Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya single entity. \21\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013) (Conditional Review of NME Entity Notice). \22\ See 2012-2013 Final Results, 79 FR at 78787. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustments for Countervailable Subsidies Because no mandatory respondent established eligibility for an adjustment under section 777A(f) of the Act for countervailable domestic subsidies, the Department, for these final results, did not make an adjustment pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act for countervailable domestic subsidies for Union or the separate-rate recipients.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 34 and Attachment 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act, the Department made an adjustment for countervailable export subsidies. For Union, we made adjustments to its reported U.S. price.\24\ For the companies eligible for a separate rate, because all of these companies participated in the second countervailing duty administrative review,\25\ an adjustment has been made based on the countervailable export subsidy found for the non-selected companies in the final results of the second countervailing duty administrative review (or its own calculated rate, in the case of Kromet).\26\ For a full explanation, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ See Memorandum from Mark Flessner to the File entitled, ``2013-2014 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Analysis of the Final Results Margin Calculation for Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd.,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Union Final Analysis Memorandum). \25\ See Aluminum Extrusions From the People]s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012, 79 FR 78788, 78789-90 (December 31, 2014). \26\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Attachment 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the PRC-wide entity, since the entity is not currently under review, no adjustments were warranted to its rate, as its rate is not subject to change.\27\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ See 2012-2013 Final Results, 79 FR at 78787; see also Conditional Review of NME Entity Notice, 78 FR 65970. As the rate for the PRC-wide entity is not subject to change in the instant review, the margin from the 2012-2013 Final Results that we are applying to the PRC-wide entity in the instant review is net of countervailable domestic and export subsidies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of Review The Department determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR for these final results: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin adjusted for Weighted- liquidation Exporter average and cash dumping deposit margin (%) purposes \28\ (%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Allied Maker Limited.................... 86.01 85.73 Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd 86.01 85.73 Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd......... 86.01 85.73 Justhere Co., Ltd....................... 86.01 85.73 Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd \29\. 86.01 85.73 Kromet International Inc................ 86.01 85.66 Metaltek Group Co., Ltd................. 86.01 85.73 Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd \30\........ 86.01 85.73 tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd........... 86.01 85.73 Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd.......... 86.01 85.73 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ See the memorandum from Mark Flessner to The File entitled, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Export Subsidy Adjustment Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014,'' dated concurrently with this notice. \29\ Although the Department initiated a review for both Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd. and Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd, it is apparent from the company's separate-rate application that Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd is the exporter and Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd. is a producer only; thus, Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd is the appropriate party to grant the separate rate status. \30\ Although the Department initiated a review for Permasteelisa South China Factory and Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd., it is apparent from the company's separate-rate application that Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd. is the exporter and Permasteelisa South China Factory is a producer only; thus, Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd. is the appropriate party to grant the separate rate status. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additionally, the Department determines for these final results that the following companies are part of the PRC-wide entity: Jangho (which includes Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.); Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/ Xinya (which includes Guang Ya Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd.; Foshan Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd.; Kong Ah International Company Limited; Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd.; Guangdong Zhongya Aluminium Company Limited; Zhongya Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited; Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd.; and Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.); Aluminicaste Fundicion de Mexico; China Zhongwang Holdings, Ltd.; Classic & Contemporary Inc.; Dongguan Golden Tiger; Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; Gold Mountain International Development, Ltd.; Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc.; Metaltek Metal Industry Co., Ltd.; Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd.; Press Metal International Ltd.; Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co., Ltd.; tenKsolar, Inc.; Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd.; WTI Building Products, Ltd.; and Zahoqing China Square Industry Limited/Zhaoqing China Square [[Page 75064]] Industry Limited. The rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity in the previous administrative review is 33.28 percent.\31\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ See 2012-2013 Final Results, 79 FR at 78787. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review in the Federal Register. Consistent with the Department's assessment practice in NME cases, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate.\32\ In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under the exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\33\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings; Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment Practice Refinement). \33\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For each individually-examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, the Department will calculate importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review where an importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For the other companies eligible for a separate rate, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on the company's entries of subject merchandise at the rates listed above in the section ``Final Results of Review.'' Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Union and the other companies eligible for a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will that listed above in the section ``Final Results of Review''; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the exporter was reviewed; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established for the PRC-wide entity of 33.28 percent;\34\ and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC producer or exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter with the subject merchandise. The deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \34\ See 2012-2013 Final Results, 79 FR at 78787. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure The Department intends to disclose to the parties the calculations performed for these final results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties and/ or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order Notification to Interested Parties This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties This administrative review and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: November 20, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Issues Raised in Case and Rebuttal Briefs Summary Background Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference Discussion of the Issues Issue 1: Collapsing of Zhongya Issue 2: Improper Calculation of Union's Dumping Margin Issue 3: Assignment of Union's Revised Dumping Margin to the Separate Rate Respondents Issue 4: Use of Union's Recalculated Margin as the AFA Rate Issue 5: Revision of the PRC-Wide Rate to Reflect Union's Recalculated Dumping Margin Conclusion [FR Doc. 2015-30502 Filed 11-30-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![75060 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices
review of that party absent new was conducted, the NME entity’s entries Dated: November 13, 2015.
information as to the party’s location. were not subject to the review and the Christian Marsh,
Moreover, if the interested party who rate for the NME entity is not subject to Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
files a request for review is unable to change as a result of that review and Countervailing Duty Operations.
locate the producer or exporter for (although the rate for the individual [FR Doc. 2015–30499 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am]
which it requested the review, the exporter may change as a function of the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
interested party must provide an finding that the exporter is part of the
explanation of the attempts it made to NME entity).
locate the producer or exporter at the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Following initiation of an
same time it files its request for review,
antidumping administrative review International Trade Administration
in order for the Secretary to determine
when there is no review requested of the
if the interested party’s attempts were [A–570–967]
NME entity, the Department will
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all
351.303(f)(3)(ii). Aluminum Extrusions From the
As explained in Antidumping and exporters not named in the initiation
notice, including those that were People’s Republic of China: Final
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Results of Antidumping Duty
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 suspended at the NME entity rate.
Administrative Review; 2013–2014
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- All requests must be filed
Market Economy Antidumping electronically in Enforcement and AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Proceedings: Assessment of Compliance’s Antidumping and International Trade Administration,
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 Countervailing Duty Centralized Department of Commerce.
(October 24, 2011) the Department Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’) SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
clarified its practice with respect to the on Enforcement and Compliance’s (the Department) is conducting an
collection of final antidumping duties ACCESS Web site at http:// administrative review of the
on imports of merchandise where access.trade.gov.4 Further, in antidumping duty order on aluminum
intermediate firms are involved. The accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), extrusions from the People’s Republic of
public should be aware of this a copy of each request must be served China (PRC).1 The period of review
clarification in determining whether to on the petitioner and each exporter or (POR) is May 1, 2013, through April 30,
request an administrative review of producer specified in the request. 2014. These final results cover 39
merchandise subject to antidumping The Department will publish in the companies for which an administrative
findings and orders.2 Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation review was initiated and not rescinded.2
Further, as explained in Antidumping The Department selected the following
of Administrative Review of
Proceedings: Announcement of Change companies as mandatory respondents:
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
in Department Practice for Respondent Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Selection in Antidumping Duty Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho
Investigation’’ for requests received by
Proceedings and Conditional Review of Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.
the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME the last day of December 2015. If the
Department does not receive, by the last (collectively, Jangho), Union Industry
Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR (Asia) Co., Ltd. (Union), and Guang Ya
65963 (November 4, 2013), the day of December 2015, a request for
review of entries covered by an order, Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd., Foshan
Department clarified its practice with Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd., Kong
regard to the conditional review of the finding, or suspended investigation
listed in this notice and for the period Ah International Company Limited, and
non-market economy (NME) entity in Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong
administrative reviews of antidumping identified above, the Department will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping or Kong) Ltd. (collectively, Guang Ya
duty orders. The Department will no
countervailing duties on those entries at Group); Guangdong Zhongya
longer consider the NME entity as an
a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or Aluminium Company Limited, Zhongya
exporter conditionally subject to
bond for) estimated antidumping or Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding
administrative reviews. Accordingly,
countervailing duties required on those Limited, and Karlton Aluminum
the NME entity will not be under review
entries at the time of entry, or Company Ltd. (collectively, Zhongya);
unless the Department specifically
withdrawal from warehouse, for and Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel
receives a request for, or self-initiates, a
consumption and to continue to collect Product Co., Ltd. (Xinya) (collectively,
review of the NME entity.3 In
the cash deposit previously ordered. Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya).3
administrative reviews of antidumping
duty orders on merchandise from NME For the first administrative review of 1 The Department initiated this review on June
countries where a review of the NME any order, there will be no assessment 27, 2014. See Initiation of Antidumping and
entity has not been initiated, but where of antidumping or countervailing duties Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
an individual exporter for which a on entries of subject merchandise 36462 (June 27, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
2 This administrative review initially covered 155
review was initiated does not qualify for entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
companies. See Initiation Notice. However, on
a separate rate, the Department will for consumption during the relevant January 29, 2015, the Department rescinded this
issue a final decision indicating that the provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of review with respect to 116 companies. See
company in question is part of the NME the order, if such a gap period is Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic
entity. However, in that situation, applicable to the period of review. of China: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 80 FR 4868 (January 29,
because no review of the NME entity This notice is not required by statute 2015).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2 See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web
but is published as a service to the 3 In prior segments of this proceeding the
international trading community. Department found that the Guang Ya Group,
site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. Zhongya, and Xinya were affiliated and should be
3 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties treated as a single entity. See, e.g., Aluminum
should specify that they are requesting a review of 4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China:
entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
the extent possible, include the names of such Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR Review and Rescission, in Part, 2010/12, 79 FR 96
exporters in their request. 39263 (July 6, 2011). (January 2, 2014) and Aluminum Extrusions From
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:35 Nov 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM 01DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_75290/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices 75063
rate. As a result, the Department finds Adjustments for Countervailable review,25 an adjustment has been made
for these final results that these 15 Subsidies based on the countervailable export
companies are also part of the PRC-wide Because no mandatory respondent subsidy found for the non-selected
entity. The Department’s change in established eligibility for an adjustment companies in the final results of the
policy regarding conditional review of under section 777A(f) of the Act for second countervailing duty
the PRC-wide entity applies to this countervailable domestic subsidies, the administrative review (or its own
administrative review.21 Under this Department, for these final results, did calculated rate, in the case of Kromet).26
policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be not make an adjustment pursuant to For a full explanation, see the Issues
under review unless a party specifically section 777A(f) of the Act for and Decision Memorandum at Comment
requests, or the Department self- countervailable domestic subsidies for 3.
initiates, a review of the entity. Because Union or the separate-rate recipients.23 For the PRC-wide entity, since the
no party requested a review of the PRC- Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the entity is not currently under review, no
wide entity in this review, the entity is Act, the Department made an adjustments were warranted to its rate,
not under review and the entity’s rate adjustment for countervailable export as its rate is not subject to change.27
from the previous administrative review subsidies. For Union, we made
Final Results of Review
adjustments to its reported U.S. price.24
(i.e., 33.28 percent) is not subject to
For the companies eligible for a separate The Department determines that the
change.22
rate, because all of these companies following weighted-average dumping
participated in the second margins exist for the POR for these final
countervailing duty administrative results:
Margin
Weighted- adjusted for
average liquidation
Exporter dumping and cash
margin deposit
(%) purposes 28
(%)
Allied Maker Limited ................................................................................................................................................ 86.01 85.73
Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................ 86.01 85.73
Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................ 86.01 85.73
Justhere Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................... 86.01 85.73
Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd 29 ............................................................................................................... 86.01 85.73
Kromet International Inc .......................................................................................................................................... 86.01 85.66
Metaltek Group Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 86.01 85.73
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd 30 ............................................................................................................................. 86.01 85.73
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................. 86.01 85.73
Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................. 86.01 85.73
International Company Limited; Guang Industrial Co., Ltd.; Gold Mountain
Additionally, the Department Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) International Development, Ltd.; Golden
determines for these final results that Ltd.; Guangdong Zhongya Aluminium Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group,
the following companies are part of the Company Limited; Zhongya Shaped Inc.; Metaltek Metal Industry Co., Ltd.;
PRC-wide entity: Jangho (which Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited; Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd.; Press
includes Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd.; and Metal International Ltd.; Shenyang
Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. and Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Yuanda Aluminium Industry
Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.); Product Co., Ltd.); Aluminicaste Engineering Co., Ltd.; tenKsolar, Inc.;
Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya (which Fundicion de Mexico; China Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp.,
includes Guang Ya Aluminium Zhongwang Holdings, Ltd.; Classic & Ltd.; WTI Building Products, Ltd.; and
Industries Co., Ltd.; Foshan Guangcheng Contemporary Inc.; Dongguan Golden Zahoqing China Square Industry
Aluminium Co., Ltd.; Kong Ah Tiger; Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Limited/Zhaoqing China Square
21 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 25 See Aluminum Extrusions From the People]s Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing 2014,’’ dated concurrently with this notice.
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Duty Administrative Review; 2012, 79 FR 78788, 29 Although the Department initiated a review for
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 78789–90 (December 31, 2014). both Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 26 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Co., Ltd. and Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn
FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013) (Conditional Attachment 1. Bhd, it is apparent from the company’s separate-rate
Review of NME Entity Notice). 27 See 2012–2013 Final Results, 79 FR at 78787; application that Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn
22 See 2012–2013 Final Results, 79 FR at 78787. Bhd is the exporter and Taishan City Kam Kiu
see also Conditional Review of NME Entity Notice,
23 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 34
Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd. is a producer only;
78 FR 65970. As the rate for the PRC-wide entity
thus, Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd is the
and Attachment 1. is not subject to change in the instant review, the appropriate party to grant the separate rate status.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24 See Memorandum from Mark Flessner to the margin from the 2012–2013 Final Results that we 30 Although the Department initiated a review for
File entitled, ‘‘2013–2014 Administrative Review of are applying to the PRC-wide entity in the instant Permasteelisa South China Factory and
the Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum review is net of countervailable domestic and Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd., it is apparent from
Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: export subsidies. the company’s separate-rate application that
Analysis of the Final Results Margin Calculation for 28 See the memorandum from Mark Flessner to
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd. is the exporter and
Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd.,’’ dated The File entitled, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the Permasteelisa South China Factory is a producer
concurrently with this notice (Union Final Analysis People’s Republic of China: Export Subsidy only; thus, Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd. is the
Memorandum). Adjustment Memorandum for the Final Results of appropriate party to grant the separate rate status.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:35 Nov 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM 01DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_75290/page/4.svg)
![75064 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices
Industry Limited. The rate previously Cash Deposit Requirements disclosed under APO in accordance
established for the PRC-wide entity in The following cash deposit with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
the previous administrative review is requirements will be effective upon continues to govern business
33.28 percent.31 publication of the final results of this proprietary information in this segment
administrative review for all shipments of the proceeding. Timely written
Assessment
of the subject merchandise from the PRC notification of the return or destruction
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, of APO materials or conversion to
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the for consumption on or after the judicial protective order is hereby
Department will determine, and U.S. publication date, as provided for by requested. Failure to comply with the
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for regulations and the terms of an APO is
shall assess, antidumping duties on all Union and the other companies eligible a sanctionable violation.
appropriate entries. The Department for a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
intends to issue assessment instructions Notification to Interested Parties
will that listed above in the section
to CBP 15 days after the date of ‘‘Final Results of Review’’; (2) for This administrative review and notice
publication of the final results of review previously investigated or reviewed PRC are issued and published in accordance
in the Federal Register. Consistent with and non-PRC exporters not listed above with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Department’s assessment practice in that have a separate rate, the cash the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
NME cases, for entries that were not deposit rate will continue to be the Dated: November 20, 2015.
reported in the U.S. sales databases exporter-specific rate published for the
submitted by companies individually Paul Piquado,
most recently completed segment of this
examined during this review, the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
proceeding in which the exporter was Compliance.
Department will instruct CBP to reviewed; (3) for all PRC exporters of
liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide subject merchandise which have not Appendix—List of Issues Raised in
rate.32 In addition, if the Department been found to be entitled to a separate Case and Rebuttal Briefs
determines that an exporter under rate, the cash deposit rate will be that Summary
review had no shipments of subject established for the PRC-wide entity of Background
merchandise, any suspended entries 33.28 percent;34 and (4) for all non-PRC Application of Facts Available and Use of
that entered under the exporter’s case exporters of subject merchandise which Adverse Inference
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will have not received their own rate, the Discussion of the Issues
be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.33 cash deposit rate will be the rate Issue 1: Collapsing of Zhongya
For each individually-examined applicable to the PRC producer or Issue 2: Improper Calculation of Union’s
respondent whose weighted-average exporter that supplied that non-PRC Dumping Margin
dumping margin is above de minimis exporter with the subject merchandise. Issue 3: Assignment of Union’s Revised
(i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of Dumping Margin to the Separate Rate
The deposit requirements, when Respondents
this review, the Department will imposed, shall remain in effect until Issue 4: Use of Union’s Recalculated
calculate importer-specific ad valorem further notice. Margin as the AFA Rate
duty assessment rates based on the ratio Issue 5: Revision of the PRC-Wide Rate to
of the total amount of dumping Disclosure
Reflect Union’s Recalculated Dumping
calculated for the importer’s examined The Department intends to disclose to Margin
sales to the total entered value of those the parties the calculations performed Conclusion
same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR for these final results within five days [FR Doc. 2015–30502 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am]
351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to of the date of publication of this notice BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
assess antidumping duties on all in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
appropriate entries covered by this Notification to Importers
review where an importer- (or DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
customer-) specific assessment rate This notice serves as a final reminder
calculated in the final results of this to importers of their responsibility International Trade Administration
review is above de minimis. Where under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
either the respondent’s weighted- certificate regarding the reimbursement Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
average dumping margin is zero or de of antidumping duties and/or Review
minimis, or an importer- (or customer- countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
) specific assessment rate is zero or de
during this POR. Failure to comply with International Trade Administration,
minimis, the Department will instruct
this requirement could result in the Department of Commerce.
CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties. Department’s presumption that SUMMARY: In accordance with section
For the other companies eligible for a reimbursement of antidumping duties 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
separate rate, the Department will and/or countervailing duties occurred amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of
instruct CBP to assess antidumping and the subsequent assessment of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is
duties on the company’s entries of doubled antidumping duties. automatically initiating the five-year
subject merchandise at the rates listed Administrative Protective Order review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the
above in the section ‘‘Final Results of Notification to Interested Parties antidumping and countervailing duty
Review.’’ (‘‘AD/CVD’’) orders listed below. The
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
This notice serves as the only
International Trade Commission (‘‘the
reminder to parties subject to
31 See 2012–2013 Final Results, 79 FR at 78787. Commission’’) is publishing
administrative protective order (APO) of
32 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping concurrently with this notice its notice
their responsibility concerning the
Proceedings; Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 of Institution of Five-Year Review which
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment Practice disposition of proprietary information
covers the same orders.
Refinement).
33 Id. 34 See 2012–2013 Final Results, 79 FR at 78787. DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:35 Nov 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM 01DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_75290/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-02 09:10:05
Document Modified: 2018-03-02 09:10:05
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective Date: December 1, 2015. | |
| Contact | Deborah Scott, Mark Flessner, or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2657, (202) 482-6312 or (202) 482-0649, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 75060 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR